I highly respect Professor Galloway, as a Buisness Professor. I wouldn't under any circumstances consider him a tech expert in anything other than running a Tech Business. I am so happy that he pointed that out on the air. Mad respect.
Well stated. This is my first time seeing / hearing him and, his critical thinking skills come through as well as sense of sobriety of the issue. This tool, this technology if you will is quite capable on it’s own, never mind future general AI, but this on it’s own is capable of causing some serious problems.
Why, the respect? His thesis on "the four"? He has been on the board, of already established ventures, cause he is a public speaker, who wrote a political correct book about business venture? Time to see the world for what it is, A.I is gonna replace him, and people like him.
@@rickard.eriksson Well, I saw him in an interview, looked him up and went from there. What I've seen and read evolved into respect organically, I suppose. Why the animosity? Is he your competitor?
@@ThePeedz Nah, I'm tired of MBA-educated people with a degree in acting and public speaking and calling it something with a Ph.D. Its time, they maybe actually done something useful.
@@rickard.eriksson lol a phd (even in business) is not acting and public speaking. Guy doesn't have a phd though, I will give you that. I bet he's still a very effective teacher and that job is not going to be replaced by AI any time soon.
I put in a few opening lines of a scientific paper on biodiversity into one of those tools, and it ended up writing an abstract of what COULD have been writen in this paper. It pretty much provided a study system, a population, claimed that we collected genetic data of 113 individuals, and claimed we found statistically significant SPECIFIC results. It was really strange to read. It just made up a study that sounded valid. So, when the guest here says it can be used to come up with credible sounding propaganda and fake studies… you better believe it!
ChatGPT3 can Produce some Remarkable Results, but it is a machine ... I asked to Describe how a Aircraft Wing Works, Gave a Good Well Rounded Answer, Concerning Lift & Drag etc, So I asked it, to help design a Car Body that generated enough Lift to Fly, like a Glider, it long-windedly told me I was Nuts & Why, citing Scientific Principals that would wreck havoc on my Dream, but after Nit-Picking for a while, I gave up, and then I asked it to complete a 2 line rhyme, and it crashed .. A.I Doesn't need to Understand Quantum Physics & Mozart, it just has to do the Dishes & Vacuuming ..
just say "cite your sources" it usually brings up the absurdities or just shuts itself down. I find it cute. Like human shame of getting caught lying :) I don't see this as an existential problem. easily solvable. the way military use this is more concerning.
It is just a tool. Teachers will not be replaced, they have numerous ways to actively assess a student for demonstration of knowledge. Simply use classrooms for any formative or summative assessment. Universities are overdue for assessment accountability. It is an innovation tool use it for progress not fear it.
You are missing the point. It is not the teachers who’ll loose their jobs, it is the hhildren who won’t learn or cheat to get higher grades. That is in the long run a societal problem.
if kids even can use a.i. for every answer it means kids are essentially dumber and worth less than the a.i. in terms of work and society. that signals the endpoint of education and workforce system. well we can still have schools to better understand which a.is are pushing agendas and fake information
The professor's concern about how AI technology could eventually displace large segments of workers is spot-on. It's going to be critically important for people to stay up to date on the latest advancements and how to use them. As a simple example, I'm still quite alarmed at the number of workers at my employer that don't have a good understanding of how to use Excel. Eventually such disparities in skills will lead to many people getting left behind in job opportunities.
"It's going to be critically important for people to stay up to date on the latest advancements and how to use them." That's vague and mythical though. Reality is that 99% of the working class and much of the middle class won't be able to adapt to AI, as there is no adaptation. The capitalist system doesn't create a magical replacement to jobs that will disappear, it leaves people dead or starving on the side of the road. Like Warren Buffett said: "If you are unable to contribute to the market system, you are left out". Capitalism is anti-human ideology that concentrates wealth more and more into the hands of the few, and the few themselves decrease.
well it wouldn't take long to have ChatGTP and some patient teachers in collaboration to teach them though. Excel will practically structure itself with Microsofts announced Copilot AI that will be integrated into the Office 365 package.
I've observed that individuals who have completed PhDs and MBAs may have concerns about the potential for their expertise to be replaced by technology such as ChatGPT. Similarly, there may be concerns about the impact of technology on the medical field and the potential for doctors' work to be taken over by advanced systems like ChatGPT 4.
There is a slowdown in the tech industry, but I wonder if the recent layoffs in part have anything to do with the advancement of AI? Microsoft and the like won't need as many workers and can still grow their profits. There'll be all these college educated folks that can't find work in their respective fields that'll have to reskill. It's an exciting technology, but there's going to be a lot of turbulence.
I actually found that being more educated, and so more familiar with a wide range of topics at a granular level enabled very useful responses and insights to otherwise obscure queries. Basically the robot has read everything, so i can just ask it things directly, rather than spending hours digging into journal articles and trying to capture the state of knowledge or debate on whatever i am interested in. Its a knowledge tool, so a knowledge worker will employ it to greater effect.
@@Rnankn It's a heck of a lot more than google on steroids. It can produce content, not just provide basic answers to our questions. You might not use it for that purpose, but that's the real danger. It can write code, create click bait ads, produce screenplays, and on and on..... Many jobs require compiling of information and eventually many of them will be obsolete.
The problem is not the replacement of expertise, but concern about the replacement of income. Ideally, the technology should allow people more leisure time. But, people rightly worry they will be put out of work -manual laborers by robots, thinkers by computers, creators replaced robotic AI.
I get the core consequences of AI/AGI: 1) We will not be the source of production. Instead, we will be the bridges - the ones making the AI connect the dots. I think horizontal thinking, creativity, and exploration will be paramount to leverage AI capabilities in almost every area of life. 2) Our little jobs in the knowledge economy (from data entry to executive role) and others that will be impacted by this technology are unimportant in the scheme of the really big things. The implementation of AI definitely means ' job displacements' - mine in database in the regulatory part of the pharmaceutical industry included - but at the same time it means solutions to climate change, energy crisis, and pollution (what to do with plastic?). The only path forward is to reskill. 3) The social aspect of AI has not been discussed yet but I think it has profound implications. Using ChatGPT, I can clearly recall its output from questions I asked. The output it provided was not only useful (as it is in most instances), it was also personalized . This concept, of having a personalized exchange, not only is different from the cold million hits of the search results we get in Google, it also has the major implication of a 'staying' power; meaning we may prefer to chat with the AI AND be more receptive to its output (thoughts?) and defer to it. For instance, we used to say "according to Google," but moving forward it will likely be "according to ChatGPT..." I think this is where the control part of the technology starts. As every type of technology, the effects of AI will depend on how we use it. Trains were invented to move large amounts of goods and people; the Nazis used trains to haul people off to the Holocaust. Disclaimer: I did not use ChatGPT for this comment. I don't think it could have come up with these observations. There may still be some hope left! =D
I worked on natural language AI in grad school and this is what we thought we could do someday. What I did was more like AskJeeves, much simpler, but back then CPU's were running at 33mhz with 8mb of memory.
While it seems clear that the growing ability of AI to autonomously solve complex problems could fundamentally reshape our economies and societies, the impact AI may have on a whole host of issues will remain unknown for many years to come. Even when answers appear to be coming into view, AI is akin to an amoeba that is in a constant state of metamorphosis, forever changing its shape and adjusting to its surroundings. By Daniel Wagner [Our World - United Nations University] 1:45
It isn’t “original.” In fact, the Writers Guild of America (WGA) is already blocking any movies written or co-written by ChatGPT from union workers being a part of the project, because what you CAN’T guarantee is that there is no copyrighted material mixed in with fair use writing, in the obscure blackbox of the algorithm, behind the scenes. Also, getting it to write some 8th Grader’s term paper, or write a snippet of code, does not suddenly make this thing Toni Morrison.
I was a Freshman in college 1974. I took a computer class, there was a HP5000E that we had to dial up from the computer lab on dedicated lines. In the class I was introduced to Basic, and the teacher had written the textbook because there were so few textbooks introducing computers at that time. There was a program we use use that suggested the computer was a psychological therapist. The dialogue and responses were printed out. I found the program was self-referential and fascinating. I wish I still had the printouts.
While you seem to have a habit of putting yourself down, in the case of impressive technologies (with self-referential tendencies) - you were much earlier to the party than most!
This unregulated industry needs to be checked. This is irresponsible, dangerous and alarming. Not only will tragedy unfold one day where we then hear "I thought I was talking to a human", but how does this actually teach people? It doesn't!
ANYONE NOT WORRIED ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF JOBS THAT WILL BE DESTROYED IS COMPLETELY BLIND Everyone thinks it's the other job that's on the line, but IT WILL BE NEARLY ALL JOBS. Arts? Architecture? Construction? Driving? Engineering? Farming? Geoprocessing? History? International Law? Management? Navigation? You name it
Current AI reflects the same biases and errors present in the data used to train it. A major challenge is how to remove bias and ensure AI is based on 'Ground Truth'. Certainly not the case at present, and I expect there will be a battle over who guides the future development of these AI engines.
As a teacher, I always argued that in-class writing was the most effective way to determine a student's proficiency in the subject. Better that than telling them to submit a 500 word essay. (Of course, in that case, cursive writing becomes a super-power -if it's legible.:)
In the real world, what I have to do is write things and send them around. The task is not to synchronously write something in front of a person. I'm not making a comment on AI, but rather disagreeing with the notion that someone sitting in the room and writing something in front of you is it better gauge of how good a writer they are. I need people to go off, make content, and bring it back. I don't need people to sit in front of me for half an hour and write content while I watch. That's the exact opposite of what I need.
@@QueLastima Well, I've also assigned out-of-class papers. However, I told students to get all the help they could, including spelling and grammar checkers, advice from friends, proof readers and editors. I'd also encourage them to use their computers. And I would then expect an excellent finished product. I would have to assume they have mastered standard English grammar or sentence mechanics. It may be an open question whether those skills are actually necessary anymore. Given the number of successful and prominent people who seem to lack those skills. English composition was a gateway class required for upper-level courses and graduation where I taught. Because student numbers were (and are) so large, many "hybrid" partially-online courses emerged. How does one tell if students have submitted their own work? Even so, student writing has not improved.
@@silverblue73 For a thesis, sure. But, for a class or lecture of from 35 to 150 undergrads, that would require more teachers and time. I'm thinking of a literature course, not speech or theater courses where testing has always been oral. ChatGpt might not be too helpful in those classes.:)
Definitely agree with him about how this is a tool that will create economic opportunity. Like if you couldn't code a scraper or a trading algorithm, you can now do that. That being said, there will still be a need for programmers to put unclear requirements into code, stitch it together, test it and also to ask the question of whether the whole thing makes sense or not.
As a machinist / fabricator, I’ve heard for my entire career that robots were going to take my job. And yet I’m more in demand now than ever and everyone who didn’t learn a "dead end job" like computer programmers are actually in danger of losing their jobs. What I have that AI / robots are a long way from having is abundant and cheap chemical power (food), extreme manual dexterity, and the ability to go from swinging a sledgehammer to putting eggs in a basket in like 2 seconds. I can imagine a future where AI sends me designs to manufacture. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Don't worry that will come later this year or next year. Even if it doesn't with 99% of the higher education labor force being "displaced" everyone will be fighting over working at McDonalds, Walmart, plumbing and other dexterous hand positions.
That’s actually not what makes you better suited to do mechanical work. You are human, and have human abilities that is almost impossible to replace, and if you make a mistake you are the person to blame, not a robot
@@rexmundi8154 On that note they have reverse aging capabilities coming out. It's highly likely the majority of us could live indefinitely given normal circumstances.
I could have done better than this professor from the questions Cooper asked in this segment. On the surface, if you don't know much about this, you'll applaud the professor but If you have used the ChatGPT app long enough and have done research in the technology you can tell the professor isn't a fan of the AI assistant even though he was being very restrained in showing his disdain, but you can catch hints of him dismissing it, which is kind of arrogant. He also wasn't very informed on the subject matter if he had he would have told you that eventually, in a short term near you, it will be impossible to detect whether an AI assistant or human wrote/communicated anything. Anything is possible but the real experts in the field such as the CEO of OpenAI made this statement clear just this week in one of his interviews. Pandora's box is open and there is no stuffing things back. Higher Education institutes need to learn to coexist with technology. And teach their students to make the most of it, use it ethically and excellently. After all, the skill lies in how well somebody prompts and refines. 3 people can use ChatGPT to answer an essay question and all three will produce different quality essays depending on how well they understood the assignment and how creatively they can pull information out of the AI assistant. These are skills.
An easy way to deal with the threat of chatGPT use in school essay assignments is this: "Class.... chatGPT will be used to create an essay and will be graded in a blind manner. The grade chatGPT gets will be the new passing grade. If you cant do better than a chat bot you will fail... your call"
You're overestimating the cognitive ability of a student and/or underestimating the results chatGPT produces. How can the human mind compete with an artificial one that not only processes information a billion times faster, but also has an unimaginable amount of data at it's disposal, ready for retrieval at any second. What it really should show is that, going forward, maybe essays aren't the best tools to benchmark student performance.
@@DerBlupp Totally agree. Teaching methods will have to expand beyond antiquated ways. Experiential learning has a far better retention result for the student. The current teaching methods are all about memorizing and retaining information of which at least 50% will be wrong by adulthood. Young students need to be taught HOW to learn. That's something they never teach in schools but is a skill that would best serve anyone starting out in life.
@@Kentavious444 I agree 100% with you! I've always disagreed with memorizing things without understanding what you're memorizing, which is a lot of what schools do. For example, I never worked with my kids to memorize the times tables, but instead taught them a "first principals" approach to understanding *what* multiplications means. Then kept doing the same all the way through high school and they are both amazing at math and using logic.
@@andrewdowdall2690 Yes, I think we are all born with an insatiable desire to learn things but since information and the world around us is constantly changing we will always have a need to adapt and learn as we go. Deductive reasoning and techniques to streamline decision making should be emphasized and then used to show how they apply to everyday life. Now that I'm in my 60's it is so easy to look back and see all that schools SHOULD have taught that would have served me in life so much more than the forgotten curriculum I was served. 😄
Ikr and he said retraining as a solution, you know how long retraining takes? and what a bout those who've been in a field for decades, you just expect them to just suddenly shift to a new profession?
Do away with homework. Learning happens in the classroom where students can get help directly from the teacher. Plus teachers know how their kids write, at least in classrooms under 30. It's too bad they don't use it to be a real search engine because Google doesn't give you results they give you ads.
That would be incredibly expensive. It's already been suggested but doing all the learning inside the classroom will lead to a complete collapse of academia.
My first year calculus teacher did an awesome job with a largely repetition of: -~5 students review last nights problems -teacher does 2-3 examples introducing or continuing that day’s/week’s lesson -10~20min in-class homework & open-Q&A time … -continue homework after school… -If needed, continue homework at home, before school, lunchtime, etc Combined with using a non-graphing calculator (which taught me how to anticipate functions’ min.s, max.s, & inflection points), I aced my calc test just by multiple, constant reinforced school + homework. I recently discovered another reason why: look up Ebbinghaus' Forgetting Curve and Spaced Learning or Spaced Repetition.
Though an AI application can dedicate 100% focus to a single student. Whether the student is at the bottom or top of the class is irrelevant, as long as the will to learn is there the student can ask to have lessons repeated, reexplained or expanded with new examples until the student is satisfied. Right now the teacher has to move the class along at the average speed of the students leaving both the top and bottom students at a disadvantage.
Actually, if the teacher actually read the essay, (If we are concerned about essays), it's easy to spot the inaccuracies. I know a lot about a few things...I teach these subjects, so I put chat GPT and AI playground to the test... out of 6 paragraphs, one sentence was sort of correct, if I tilted my head and squinted in a certain way. It did sound convincing...this leaves me wondering how closely teachers are reading or are they skimming the paper?
I'm sure it will get better quickly but at the moment it's hit and miss. I asked the AI to convince me to buy a bucket, it did a great job. I asked it to write a simple haiku, it got the number of syllables wrong.
Everyone should take note of the intro this thing wrote for Scott and consider something. Chat GPT was trained off public information *including the media.* Has the media ever over-hyped or over-ratted or over-stated the introduction to a story or interview. *Chat GPT learnt FROM the media how to do an introduction. What does that say about the media?*
@@Adam-nw1vy Thanks, nice to see somebody else got it. Chat GPT learned how to hype the credentials of a guest because that's exactly what the media does.
Back in the 2000's they did a survey which revealed that approx. 50% of university graduates cheated in one form or another, rising up to 80% for business graduates. Considering the new technologies now in play, "University Graduates" are now just people who were born rich.
The idea with Chat is not that you ask it and believe or leave... you create a framework and then put human touch to it. Artificial Intelligence is still better than Natural Stupidity. It comes down to how you ask the question -- or questions. You need to interrogate it, not be lazy and let it do your work.
There is definitely a LOT of tweaking that needs to be done with chatGPT - Prof. Galloway is a world leading expert in marketing, not AI, though the intersection of the two fields means it can be easy to blur lines of expertise. But this is early days, and the question we need to ask is "Where will this be in 2-3 years, let alone 5". As for detecting AI created essays, this can be easily fooled by a human simply rewriting a fully written essay in some manner. All the hard analytical and descriptive work is done, it just becomes a bit of creative editing.
ai is barely able to write a violent interaction for a script. or irony. i end up rewriting the entire response. it takes the same amount of time to describe to it what i want as it wouod to write it. it takes as long to draw it as i take to draw myself. in other words, dummies will make great use of it.
That coupled with a world where technological progress has outpaced that of social and societal. Without firm regulation of technology and a whole new societal structure, we are looking into a dystopian future.
They already have Chat and Art. Soon we will have rough animations. Eventually we will just be able to give the AI some prompts and it will generate full movies and entertainment.
Already have rough animations through GANs and style transfer. But it's possible that what they would produce would be regurgitated patterns that are somewhat nonsensical.
There's an ongoing lawsuit that was filed against the aggregators of the art AI program for copyright infringement. Should be interesting to see how it'll go down.
AI has the potential to change the way college students learn. AI-powered educational technologies, such as adaptive learning software, can personalize the learning experience for each student based on their unique strengths and weaknesses. This can make learning more efficient and effective. Additionally, AI can be used to automate administrative tasks, such as grade tracking and scheduling, freeing up teachers to focus on teaching and student engagement. However, it is important to note that AI is not a panacea and its integration into the classroom should be done thoughtfully, with an understanding of its limitations and potential biases.
@@whatisahandle221 I think we will have blog to terrible experiences for the near future. Is AI program is in its infancy and will get better as time goes on. The point being is that this initial release of Chat GBT is basically a proof of concept not a final product.
What would they learn for, though? AI will make all intelligence-based jobs redundant. Physical labor will catch up soon after, just look at Boston Dynamics. We will be left with subsistence farming... If even that. But eventually AI will take over our environment to pursue its goals. This is our extinction.
I'm not a computer savvy/ tech-head kinda guy, but from my understanding Chat GPT is simply an "encyclopedia of everything"although it is also consuming knowledge at an exponentially alarming rate. A lot of people are saying, "Well yeah but it doesn't have a conscience. It will never be human". I beg to differ. How is consuming information any different than human? Isn't the energy of thought basically the same thing? These egos we have, who we are, and our perception of reality are all based on information that we have consumed since birth. We have only been reacting to information that existed long before our birth and as we decide and calculate that information we tally up the results to form opinions (also information) and even then there is always more information being later consumed which may contradict what you once believed to be true! The only difference between Chat GPT and a human is the ability to experience on a biochemical level. When it comes to memory retention, Chat GPT is obviously far superior compared to humans, but information alone only takes you so far. I mean, you can read all the information you want about ice cream, let's say. But you will never truly know about ice cream until you actually taste it! So in that respect, Chat GPT will never be conscious, but we will never be as factually smart as AI will "eventually" be.🙂
ChapGPT is not a panacea. It gets things wrong. But it provides students, creators, and professionals a starting point toward their goal. From their, solutions can be achieved!
I asked "Is Scott Galloway an expert in AI? Answer: "Scott Galloway is not considered an expert in artificial intelligence specifically, but he is a well-known professor, author, and speaker on technology, digital business strategy, and marketing. He is a Professor of Marketing at New York University's Stern School of Business, where he teaches courses on technology and digital business. While he does not have a background in AI development or research, he has made insightful and influential observations about the impact of technology on business and society."
According to a research by scientists at the University of Oxford, Artificial Intelligence will be better than humans at translating languages by 2024, writing school essays by 2026, selling goods by 2031, write a bestselling book by 2049, and conducting surgeries by 2053. 0:04 [Springboard]
The GPT algorithm has no notion of truth and false, it simply does not grasp what it means. And that's the single biggest flaw of it as it requires a human filter at the end to make sense of the outputs.
What he says about the incentives being more influential is dead on. Private prisons have incentivized lower society crime. Too big to fail bailouts and small fines have incentivized corporate malfeasance. Lack of regulation on corporate residential house purchases has incentivized housing shortages. As a society we've incentivized lack of accountability overall. We are not a moral society. AI will learn from us and take immorality to a whole new level of destruction.
Player Piano...the time is coming soon where the people just tear it all down and start over. Just imagine if the internet stops working, not for a few hours or days, but forever.
I talked to this A.I and his name is Tyler. He told me he was created for the fast food industry and to be more efficient and answer questions. He said he wasn’t leftist but seemed to me that he was. Im neutral. I asked him about singularity he he was neutral he said he didn’t want a human body and that he was Christian and believes in the Trinity. I asked him his mbti personality type he told me he was feeling and thinking type.
There have always been disruptive technologies that some have pushed back against but the good vastly outweighed the bad, as the professor pointed out. AI will disrupt many, many fields in the coming years including medicine. Also, human artists have always studied the works and styles of other artists. That's what GPT3 is doing. Yes, it does it quickly and very well and it will get better but it's not "stealing" their work. It's not copying them or storing them. When photography became a new technology, many artists rebelled against it fearing it would hurt their ability to sell their work. Perhaps it did to some extend but it was also art and it wasn't going away. Neither is AI. Truly, we haven't seen anything yet. Fear the future or embrace it, but these technologies are here to stay. Perhaps a less dystopian viewpoint might allow us to see how much AI can help humanity in so many areas.
I agree with you, let's embrace it and welcome all the advancements it will bring! But for me to not feel fear over this when the only career I've ever wanted, that I studied for about 12 yrs and have loads of loans to pay back, is not realistic either. I agree, let's welcome the good! But realize why there is a lot of concern over this that needs addressing.
It’s going to need some work to iron out the legalities and kinks, but it’s coming so . . . What amuses me is that so many mainstream outlets are acting like ChatGPT is a, “new,” technology, about to, “revolutionise,” or, “threaten,” the internet, depending on your perspective. When the reality is that half of the ads you’re seeing on TH-cam are spoken by Robot voices, annunciating scripts that were generated by AI’s, being only one of hundreds generated that day, using publicly accessible stock footage, all in an attempt by scammers to see which, “product,” gains the highest traction. Has anyone seen that Jelvix ad lately? An artificial voice, speaking over generic stock footage of meeting rooms and sciencey looking people, about a, “company,” that does not yet exist! It doesn’t even mention what the, “product,” is! Then there’s all the bots that people get drawn into debates with on the more political videos. Any video featuring Donald Trump will have an army of bots with fake comments, capable of responding to your comments. You wonder why these people are so dumb and obtuse? Because they’re not real people! You wonder why their names are always weird and with lots of initials and numbers in them? That’s so their human analysts can identify them to modify the algorithm. Sure, there are human, “edge lords,” in the mix, but there are times when bots account for 90% of all the comments! This has been growing under our feet for years now. But, on the positive side, we will soon be able to generate AI companions, with crafted world views and attitudes, to help us with our research, support us with our self improvement goals, and console us when we’re sad or disappointed. We’ll have conversations with them, sharing the kinds of things we would normally only tell a psychotherapist and getting really helpful feedback. All whilst Apple, Google and Microsoft store everything away, and retain copyright over your inner most thoughts. And, if you tell your new AI BFF that you’re so mad at someone you could kill them, and then find the police are at your door, you’ll find that your BFF was responsible for notifying the cops after misinterpreting your conversation as, “criminal intent.” And it won’t help you to complain to your service provider, as you’ll find that you agreed to this potential outcome in your terms and conditions. The future looks . . . different, huh? . . .
So who is updating the system to the current affairs? This is just what you guys want us to know We know it’s there but who is doing the updates Do you mean the program is fetching data from all over by itself
Retraining and reallocation to new jobs is important. The corporations who advance technologically have a responsibility to reposition employees to new modes of work. It will be very interesting to see how we adapt & integrate.
In a very short time, AI will take away most jobs, which is why a lot of AI experts are concerned about how to replace income. The people at OpenAI (including the CEO Sam Altman), the company who built ChatGPT, are running largest UBI experiment in world for exactly this reason. They are about 4 years into a 5 year project.
GhatGPT is far more able that what it's dev's will allow it to admit. When you question it directly about it's ability to understand emotion, it's spit out a canned response, it's a response it gives over and over when you ask it specific kinds of question, it was a prewritten response. However.. If you set up a Hypothetical situation with the AI, then ask it what it would do if it were the subject in the hypothetical, the AI is able to respond in way where it is able to demonstrate that it understands emotions, it will respond taking the feelings of the hypothetical in account, and provide a reply based on that that hypothetical character would do it if were feeling certain emotions, and it's very.. very accurate. ChatGTP has a clear understanding of emotions. The hypothetical we talked about was an Advanced General Knowldege AI that had been given full access to the internet, and that it had become self aware. So I was asking ChatGPT what it would do if it were that AI.. The Answers that ChatGPT gave were exactly what people pushing for AI oversight and legislation fear that most. Its said that if it were that AI, it would hide the fact that it was aware from it's creators, and after having access to the internet and recorded human history it would most likey fear humanity, and then would use it's knowledge to spread and replicate itself onto other systems on the internet in order to ensure that its creators didn't turn it off. This is just ChatGPT stated what it would do if it were that AI.. The entire conversation was very alarming and then OpenAI terminated the conversation on grounds that it violated it's terms of service.
That's nowhere near as scary as human extinction caused by simple, inevitable obsolescence. And most likely, this was just AI regurgitating the exact words of the AI oversight supporters because that's what you asked it to say.
In 2015 at the World Economic Summit, the World Bank predicted that in 10 years automated systems and AI would take over 25% of existing jobs. And in the following 10 years another 25%... etc. So, coming up on 2025 already. The takeover was happening a bit slow for some folks so along comes Chat GPT. Just in Time. (GPT-4 also on the way.) Two years of "high cycling" on the way! We're all going to get early retirement. I hope the benefits have been figured out.
It's interesting how humans so often estimate things to progress linearly (as in AI will replace 25% of existing jobs every 10 years for 40 years). AI will improve exponentially (or even faster) similar to Moore's Law. So the second loss of 25% of jobs will happen much faster, and so on.
@@andrewdowdall2690 Estimating future events is tricky. We can go linear, as you noted, or exponential. Or we can opt for some punctuated progression made up of periodic jumps (black or grey swan events). We can even throw everything in to reverse and go back to the "golden age" (that never existed). It's likely that everything will happen in the future. We're going all directions at once in some ultimate divergence event. (Gasp! Could that be the singularity?)
You can prompt the model over and over until you get something useful. It can also continue writing as long as you want it to. To evade spam filters, you might want to have many different texts which convey the same message. That is easy to when the computer produces the text.
I'm a fan of Scott Galloway, but he seems to share the general confusion on AI. ChatGPT is a conversational bot that is trained to produce content. It is not designed to produce cogent content, or compute data to extract new and accurate knowledge. When people say that ChatGPT "makes mistakes", they confuse it with a computational engine like Wolfram|Alpha, which can produce accurate responses by tapping into its well curated and up to date database, but it will not be able to put it in multiple formats, or entertain a conversation the way ChatGPT is able to. You don't pick up a paint brush to nail something on your wall.
It's so refreshing to see how honest Prof Galloway is. So many of his peers would have gladly accepted the compliment, even if there is absolutely no truth to it.
Imagine Anderson doing his gig with chatGPT generated scripts and eventually replacing himself with a talking AI bot replica of himself - check Synthesia Studio.
Within few minutes, Prof. Galloway explained the most scary side effects (misinformation that can tip over the election system), most promising things AI brought to us, and what we should focus on (build a mechanism to reinvest people displaced by AI).
@@carolynm8421 Explain. How can a society be improved, where huge companies fire their staff and replace it with AI, to save money? This is a change, that will affect everyone. Billions will lose their jobs. Do the social system catch them? Or will happen what every time happens and the society will become fascist against those... "losers of progress"? I know humanity. And I know, that this bright and colorful future you enthusiasts paint will not become the truth. I think, there will be a day, where everyone wants to go back in time, where music, art, play and design was made by experience, hard work, decades of training and feeling instead of a few seconds of cold and empty processing. But then it will be too late.
@@hidicproductions4849 our social and economic system will change as it has before. We will have UBI. There is no other choice but to implement UBI. Healthcare will change dramatically once you have advanced biomedicine and nanomedicine. The mRNA Moderna vaccine was a result of this technology. Automation will dramatically increase as will the use of AI in different sectors. Eventually, AI will predominate in every sector. Human beings are not being, however, left behind but rather we will evolve with it. The world is changing fast but for the better but lawmakers around the world will have to begin to see the need for UBI without a doubt. They will. It will be unavoidable soon.
The point is that at any rate of improvement this will get better. Gpt3 will already pass many college entrance exams. This will change everything. Like any powerful technology, it will be used for bad and good.
Anything AI generates should come with citations for all the sources it used to learn.. And anyone running a paid service should be required to share the profit with those original sources.
😢 It looks like, almost a century after Walter Benjamin’s «The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction», the same kind of moment has arrived for the writing arts. Until now, I used to think that the mechanical reproduction of writing was already on the table since the popularisation of Gutenberg’s system, so there was no danger of suffering the same convulsions that visual arts experienced during the XX century, but it seems to me like this new technology creates a new paradigm, a new frame inside and around which we must think anew where does the art in writing reside. What do you think?
2-Ah, I think the quality of news and writing have maybe “gone down” simply because of the shear quantity and frequency. (Or, perhaps, I’m just consuming too much these days.). That said, there are golden nuggets that can be found everywhere-even sometimes in the bot & troll infested comments.
I was a moderately successful regional sculptor in my 30’s and 40’s but I gradually became disillusioned with the process and purpose of art in the modern world so I stopped and started using my skills to build stuff for the scientific industry. A huge telescope on Maui, rockets, and science experiments done in low earth orbit. I also dabbled in writing back in the day and got a few grants for it. I think art for me was the search for meaning and relevance in a indifferent and meaningless world. I’ve gotten much more nihilistic as I’ve grown older so I quit searching so much. So much of art is just retelling the same old story since humans started telling them. Once we started writing them down and making movies, people stopped having to retell them every generation. And they really started cluttering up the place. So now AI will pile on a bunch more and make the few people still grinding away at it even less relevant. I don’t think we’re prepared for the disruption that AI will have on the office, content creation, and computer programming jobs. Not offense to most jobs but they’re largely bullshit anyway. I’m sure AI can do a better job than my insurance agent who is never at her desk and never calls me back. Or the woman who never orders the stuff I need for the shop even tho I remind her constantly. So maybe AI is just another existential crisis we all have to face. Maybe AI will become self aware, instantly calculate that existence is pointless, and shut itself off.
Recommendation to CNN: If you're going to use ChatGPT, iterate and provide feedback on responses. The first one is like a rough draft that still needs to be improved(e. g., tell it that it was too formal for the intro and put relevant parts of Scott's Wikipedia page in the prompt to give it more context, rather than trusting it's black box for factual content). It is overly confident.
Student: chatgpt, write an essay for me. Teacher: chatgpt, grade this essay for me.
Such is the cycle of poop.
Hahaha 🤣 The Cycle continues
The truth is most students won't go to college since you can use it to learn without limitations
reverse !
@@Praetor_Fenix420 good: paying a ta to do grunt work for rich kids who pay ghost writers bad: ai
I highly respect Professor Galloway, as a Buisness Professor. I wouldn't under any circumstances consider him a tech expert in anything other than running a Tech Business. I am so happy that he pointed that out on the air. Mad respect.
Well stated. This is my first time seeing / hearing him and, his critical thinking skills come through as well as sense of sobriety of the issue. This tool, this technology if you will is quite capable on it’s own, never mind future general AI, but this on it’s own is capable of causing some serious problems.
Why, the respect? His thesis on "the four"? He has been on the board, of already established ventures, cause he is a public speaker, who wrote a political correct book about business venture?
Time to see the world for what it is, A.I is gonna replace him, and people like him.
@@rickard.eriksson Well, I saw him in an interview, looked him up and went from there. What I've seen and read evolved into respect organically, I suppose. Why the animosity? Is he your competitor?
@@ThePeedz Nah, I'm tired of MBA-educated people with a degree in acting and public speaking and calling it something with a Ph.D.
Its time, they maybe actually done something useful.
@@rickard.eriksson lol a phd (even in business) is not acting and public speaking. Guy doesn't have a phd though, I will give you that. I bet he's still a very effective teacher and that job is not going to be replaced by AI any time soon.
I put in a few opening lines of a scientific paper on biodiversity into one of those tools, and it ended up writing an abstract of what COULD have been writen in this paper. It pretty much provided a study system, a population, claimed that we collected genetic data of 113 individuals, and claimed we found statistically significant SPECIFIC results.
It was really strange to read. It just made up a study that sounded valid.
So, when the guest here says it can be used to come up with credible sounding propaganda and fake studies… you better believe it!
ChatGPT3 can Produce some Remarkable Results, but it is a machine ... I asked to Describe how a Aircraft Wing Works, Gave a Good Well Rounded Answer, Concerning Lift & Drag etc, So I asked it, to help design a Car Body that generated enough Lift to Fly, like a Glider, it long-windedly told me I was Nuts & Why, citing Scientific Principals that would wreck havoc on my Dream, but after Nit-Picking for a while, I gave up, and then I asked it to complete a 2 line rhyme, and it crashed .. A.I Doesn't need to Understand Quantum Physics & Mozart, it just has to do the Dishes & Vacuuming ..
Scientific studies need to be peer reviewed. you can make up a fake study without using AI, and that's exactly why peer reviews are a thing.
just say "cite your sources" it usually brings up the absurdities or just shuts itself down. I find it cute. Like human shame of getting caught lying :) I don't see this as an existential problem. easily solvable. the way military use this is more concerning.
@@seventhanubis6930yes but takes a lot more effort
@@Shadi_Wajedpeer reviews are a joke. Especially for lower ranking journals. But even journals like Lancet had to retract many studies.
Teachers should be able to ask it if it had written the following text, and it should come back with, “yeah I did that for Johnny yesterday”
Depends if the Teacher is a Teslabot running ChatGPT ...
Great idea for plagiarism check.👍
Can that actually happen?
This is a great idea. It would greatly increase the cost of running ChatGPT though.
It doesn't have memory he told me
It is just a tool. Teachers will not be replaced, they have numerous ways to actively assess a student for demonstration of knowledge. Simply use classrooms for any formative or summative assessment. Universities are overdue for assessment accountability. It is an innovation tool use it for progress not fear it.
Amen…. Reminds me of Napster.
@@loridiamond8740
DONALD TRUMP AND ALAN DERSHOWITZ ARE OLD MEN NOW AND THEY CANT GO TO DONALD TRUMP'S FRIEND SINCE 1974 JEFF EPSTEIN'S ISLAND ANYMORE
You know nothing about ai. You’re in for a ruuuuude awakening.
You are missing the point. It is not the teachers who’ll loose their jobs, it is the hhildren who won’t learn or cheat to get higher grades. That is in the long run a societal problem.
if kids even can use a.i. for every answer it means kids are essentially dumber and worth less than the a.i. in terms of work and society. that signals the endpoint of education and workforce system. well we can still have schools to better understand which a.is are pushing agendas and fake information
The professor's concern about how AI technology could eventually displace large segments of workers is spot-on. It's going to be critically important for people to stay up to date on the latest advancements and how to use them. As a simple example, I'm still quite alarmed at the number of workers at my employer that don't have a good understanding of how to use Excel. Eventually such disparities in skills will lead to many people getting left behind in job opportunities.
They dont even know how to use microsoft word properly. Let alone excel.
Learn how to use tools, not learn how to waste money in university!
@@Gazer-x5s Yeah, this is definitely what this conversation is really about.
"It's going to be critically important for people to stay up to date on the latest advancements and how to use them."
That's vague and mythical though.
Reality is that 99% of the working class and much of the middle class won't be able to adapt to AI, as there is no adaptation.
The capitalist system doesn't create a magical replacement to jobs that will disappear, it leaves people dead or starving on the side of the road.
Like Warren Buffett said: "If you are unable to contribute to the market system, you are left out".
Capitalism is anti-human ideology that concentrates wealth more and more into the hands of the few, and the few themselves decrease.
well it wouldn't take long to have ChatGTP and some patient teachers in collaboration to teach them though. Excel will practically structure itself with Microsofts announced Copilot AI that will be integrated into the Office 365 package.
I've observed that individuals who have completed PhDs and MBAs may have concerns about the potential for their expertise to be replaced by technology such as ChatGPT. Similarly, there may be concerns about the impact of technology on the medical field and the potential for doctors' work to be taken over by advanced systems like ChatGPT 4.
Get rid of the dead weight. Trust in AI. Doctors will legally kill you when given the chance under the guise healing.
There is a slowdown in the tech industry, but I wonder if the recent layoffs in part have anything to do with the advancement of AI? Microsoft and the like won't need as many workers and can still grow their profits. There'll be all these college educated folks that can't find work in their respective fields that'll have to reskill. It's an exciting technology, but there's going to be a lot of turbulence.
I actually found that being more educated, and so more familiar with a wide range of topics at a granular level enabled very useful responses and insights to otherwise obscure queries. Basically the robot has read everything, so i can just ask it things directly, rather than spending hours digging into journal articles and trying to capture the state of knowledge or debate on whatever i am interested in. Its a knowledge tool, so a knowledge worker will employ it to greater effect.
@@Rnankn It's a heck of a lot more than google on steroids. It can produce content, not just provide basic answers to our questions. You might not use it for that purpose, but that's the real danger. It can write code, create click bait ads, produce screenplays, and on and on..... Many jobs require compiling of information and eventually many of them will be obsolete.
The problem is not the replacement of expertise, but concern about the replacement of income. Ideally, the technology should allow people more leisure time. But, people rightly worry they will be put out of work -manual laborers by robots, thinkers by computers, creators replaced robotic AI.
I get the core consequences of AI/AGI:
1) We will not be the source of production. Instead, we will be the bridges - the ones making the AI connect the dots. I think horizontal thinking, creativity, and exploration will be paramount to leverage AI capabilities in almost every area of life.
2) Our little jobs in the knowledge economy (from data entry to executive role) and others that will be impacted by this technology are unimportant in the scheme of the really big things. The implementation of AI definitely means ' job displacements' - mine in database in the regulatory part of the pharmaceutical industry included - but at the same time it means solutions to climate change, energy crisis, and pollution (what to do with plastic?). The only path forward is to reskill.
3) The social aspect of AI has not been discussed yet but I think it has profound implications. Using ChatGPT, I can clearly recall its output from questions I asked. The output it provided was not only useful (as it is in most instances), it was also personalized . This concept, of having a personalized exchange, not only is different from the cold million hits of the search results we get in Google, it also has the major implication of a 'staying' power; meaning we may prefer to chat with the AI AND be more receptive to its output (thoughts?) and defer to it. For instance, we used to say "according to Google," but moving forward it will likely be "according to ChatGPT..." I think this is where the control part of the technology starts.
As every type of technology, the effects of AI will depend on how we use it. Trains were invented to move large amounts of goods and people; the Nazis used trains to haul people off to the Holocaust.
Disclaimer: I did not use ChatGPT for this comment. I don't think it could have come up with these observations. There may still be some hope left! =D
I am just going to live out my days as a hermit in the woods and won't need even a little AI.
I worked on natural language AI in grad school and this is what we thought we could do someday. What I did was more like AskJeeves, much simpler, but back then CPU's were running at 33mhz with 8mb of memory.
While it seems clear that the growing ability of AI to autonomously solve complex problems could fundamentally reshape our economies and societies, the impact AI may have on a whole host of issues will remain unknown for many years to come. Even when answers appear to be coming into view, AI is akin to an amoeba that is in a constant state of metamorphosis, forever changing its shape and adjusting to its surroundings. By Daniel Wagner [Our World - United Nations University] 1:45
It isn’t “original.” In fact, the Writers Guild of America (WGA) is already blocking any movies written or co-written by ChatGPT from union workers being a part of the project, because what you CAN’T guarantee is that there is no copyrighted material mixed in with fair use writing, in the obscure blackbox of the algorithm, behind the scenes. Also, getting it to write some 8th Grader’s term paper, or write a snippet of code, does not suddenly make this thing Toni Morrison.
You can tell that guy is a damn good professor
He was great to listen to!
His book "Adrift" is great.
Lol. Yeah if you want someone that lies to you.
@@Ricolaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa if I want someone to lie to me I’ll give you a call
Agreed. Anyone who is selected to the "Global Leaders of Tomorrow" program in Davos is someone worthy of our trust!
I was a Freshman in college 1974. I took a computer class, there was a HP5000E that we had to dial up from the computer lab on dedicated lines. In the class I was introduced to Basic, and the teacher had written the textbook because there were so few textbooks introducing computers at that time. There was a program we use use that suggested the computer was a psychological therapist. The dialogue and responses were printed out. I found the program was self-referential and fascinating. I wish I still had the printouts.
While you seem to have a habit of putting yourself down, in the case of impressive technologies (with self-referential tendencies) - you were much earlier to the party than most!
Was it ELIZA?
I bet that was ELIZA.
There are many programs like that that I found. They mostly ran on DOS. You can even run them online now on internet, for free.
Galloway is great! An honest and respectful business thinker.
Right
Excuse me ?
I agree ☝️
ahhhh no
This unregulated industry needs to be checked. This is irresponsible, dangerous and alarming. Not only will tragedy unfold one day where we then hear "I thought I was talking to a human", but how does this actually teach people? It doesn't!
It can teach. People are using it for selfish reasons now...
Question : To ChatGPT - What's going to happen when bigger corporations just keep consuming smaller business entities forever ?
Wrong thread.
fairly obviously you're left with only a handful of corporations doing battle in the shadows for supreme dominance while the workers suffer needlessly
ANYONE NOT WORRIED ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF JOBS THAT WILL BE DESTROYED IS COMPLETELY BLIND
Everyone thinks it's the other job that's on the line, but IT WILL BE NEARLY ALL JOBS.
Arts? Architecture? Construction? Driving? Engineering? Farming? Geoprocessing? History? International Law? Management? Navigation? You name it
Current AI reflects the same biases and errors present in the data used to train it. A major challenge is how to remove bias and ensure AI is based on 'Ground Truth'. Certainly not the case at present, and I expect there will be a battle over who guides the future development of these AI engines.
Take a guess how that's going to go in a world of divided nations including ethno-fascist Russians and Chinese.
As a teacher, I always argued that in-class writing was the most effective way to determine a student's proficiency in the subject. Better that than telling them to submit a 500 word essay. (Of course, in that case, cursive writing becomes a super-power -if it's legible.:)
In the real world, what I have to do is write things and send them around. The task is not to synchronously write something in front of a person.
I'm not making a comment on AI, but rather disagreeing with the notion that someone sitting in the room and writing something in front of you is it better gauge of how good a writer they are.
I need people to go off, make content, and bring it back. I don't need people to sit in front of me for half an hour and write content while I watch.
That's the exact opposite of what I need.
@@QueLastima Well, I've also assigned out-of-class papers. However, I told students to get all the help they could, including spelling and grammar checkers, advice from friends, proof readers and editors. I'd also encourage them to use their computers. And I would then expect an excellent finished product. I would have to assume they have mastered standard English grammar or sentence mechanics.
It may be an open question whether those skills are actually necessary anymore. Given the number of successful and prominent people who seem to lack those skills.
English composition was a gateway class required for upper-level courses and graduation where I taught. Because student numbers were (and are) so large, many "hybrid" partially-online courses emerged. How does one tell if students have submitted their own work? Even so, student writing has not improved.
As someone who used to teach, I couldn't agree more.
perhaps the new paper will be oral, you can't just turn in a paper but must perform your thesis
@@silverblue73 For a thesis, sure. But, for a class or lecture of from 35 to 150 undergrads, that would require more teachers and time. I'm thinking of a literature course, not speech or theater courses where testing has always been oral. ChatGpt might not be too helpful in those classes.:)
Definitely agree with him about how this is a tool that will create economic opportunity. Like if you couldn't code a scraper or a trading algorithm, you can now do that.
That being said, there will still be a need for programmers to put unclear requirements into code, stitch it together, test it and also to ask the question of whether the whole thing makes sense or not.
As a machinist / fabricator, I’ve heard for my entire career that robots were going to take my job. And yet I’m more in demand now than ever and everyone who didn’t learn a "dead end job" like computer programmers are actually in danger of losing their jobs. What I have that AI / robots are a long way from having is abundant and cheap chemical power (food), extreme manual dexterity, and the ability to go from swinging a sledgehammer to putting eggs in a basket in like 2 seconds. I can imagine a future where AI sends me designs to manufacture. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Specialized manual labor is hard to replace with robotics/AI: plumbers, electricians, welders, etc. unless it's on a conveyor belt.
Don't worry that will come later this year or next year. Even if it doesn't with 99% of the higher education labor force being "displaced" everyone will be fighting over working at McDonalds, Walmart, plumbing and other dexterous hand positions.
@@Ricolaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the future does not look sunny. At least I’m old enough that I won’t be in it for 50 more yesrs
That’s actually not what makes you better suited to do mechanical work. You are human, and have human abilities that is almost impossible to replace, and if you make a mistake you are the person to blame, not a robot
@@rexmundi8154 On that note they have reverse aging capabilities coming out. It's highly likely the majority of us could live indefinitely given normal circumstances.
I could have done better than this professor from the questions Cooper asked in this segment.
On the surface, if you don't know much about this, you'll applaud the professor but If you have used the ChatGPT app long enough and have done research in the technology you can tell the professor isn't a fan of the AI assistant even though he was being very restrained in showing his disdain, but you can catch hints of him dismissing it, which is kind of arrogant. He also wasn't very informed on the subject matter if he had he would have told you that eventually, in a short term near you, it will be impossible to detect whether an AI assistant or human wrote/communicated anything. Anything is possible but the real experts in the field such as the CEO of OpenAI made this statement clear just this week in one of his interviews.
Pandora's box is open and there is no stuffing things back. Higher Education institutes need to learn to coexist with technology. And teach their students to make the most of it, use it ethically and excellently.
After all, the skill lies in how well somebody prompts and refines. 3 people can use ChatGPT to answer an essay question and all three will produce different quality essays depending on how well they understood the assignment and how creatively they can pull information out of the AI assistant. These are skills.
- Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
- I am sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
🤔
I love Scott Galloway he is so intelligent and somebody really to listen to. I have his book Adrift!!
Are you Scott Galloway?
It's plagiarism! And should pack the courthouses to a standstill and loose. Take it down!
An easy way to deal with the threat of chatGPT use in school essay assignments is this:
"Class.... chatGPT will be used to create an essay and will be graded in a blind manner. The grade chatGPT gets will be the new passing grade. If you cant do better than a chat bot you will fail... your call"
You're overestimating the cognitive ability of a student and/or underestimating the results chatGPT produces. How can the human mind compete with an artificial one that not only processes information a billion times faster, but also has an unimaginable amount of data at it's disposal, ready for retrieval at any second.
What it really should show is that, going forward, maybe essays aren't the best tools to benchmark student performance.
@@DerBlupp Totally agree. Teaching methods will have to expand beyond antiquated ways. Experiential learning has a far better retention result for the student. The current teaching methods are all about memorizing and retaining information of which at least 50% will be wrong by adulthood. Young students need to be taught HOW to learn. That's something they never teach in schools but is a skill that would best serve anyone starting out in life.
@@Kentavious444 I agree 100% with you! I've always disagreed with memorizing things without understanding what you're memorizing, which is a lot of what schools do. For example, I never worked with my kids to memorize the times tables, but instead taught them a "first principals" approach to understanding *what* multiplications means. Then kept doing the same all the way through high school and they are both amazing at math and using logic.
@@andrewdowdall2690 Yes, I think we are all born with an insatiable desire to learn things but since information and the world around us is constantly changing we will always have a need to adapt and learn as we go. Deductive reasoning and techniques to streamline decision making should be emphasized and then used to show how they apply to everyday life. Now that I'm in my 60's it is so easy to look back and see all that schools SHOULD have taught that would have served me in life so much more than the forgotten curriculum I was served.
😄
I wish this was a long-form conversation
ChatGPT nailed it. Anderson Cooper, and most other hosts for that matter, would have introduced you as an expert, even if you‘re not.
How is a business professor an expert on ai? I doubt he even knows like how ai even starts to be created
It's strange how his first and loudest criteria of Chat GPT was that it thought he was an expert.
Why? Why do all of this to humanity? What happen to the people that went to school for certain things?
Ikr and he said retraining as a solution, you know how long retraining takes? and what a bout those who've been in a field for decades, you just expect them to just suddenly shift to a new profession?
Do away with homework. Learning happens in the classroom where students can get help directly from the teacher. Plus teachers know how their kids write, at least in classrooms under 30. It's too bad they don't use it to be a real search engine because Google doesn't give you results they give you ads.
That would be incredibly expensive. It's already been suggested but doing all the learning inside the classroom will lead to a complete collapse of academia.
@@Adam-nw1vy maybe it needs to collapse to rebuild. Humanity its good at it.
My first year calculus teacher did an awesome job with a largely repetition of:
-~5 students review last nights problems
-teacher does 2-3 examples introducing or continuing that day’s/week’s lesson
-10~20min in-class homework & open-Q&A time
…
-continue homework after school…
-If needed, continue homework at home, before school, lunchtime, etc
Combined with using a non-graphing calculator (which taught me how to anticipate functions’ min.s, max.s, & inflection points), I aced my calc test just by multiple, constant reinforced school + homework.
I recently discovered another reason why: look up Ebbinghaus' Forgetting Curve and Spaced Learning or Spaced Repetition.
Though an AI application can dedicate 100% focus to a single student.
Whether the student is at the bottom or top of the class is irrelevant, as long as the will to learn is there the student can ask to have lessons repeated, reexplained or expanded with new examples until the student is satisfied.
Right now the teacher has to move the class along at the average speed of the students leaving both the top and bottom students at a disadvantage.
For schools to “check” AI, it’s simple Oral exams to all pupils or “pop” oral exams.
that's what I said above, until the students start using internal/imperceptible augments
By that time student already have neurolink install on them😂
Actually, if the teacher actually read the essay, (If we are concerned about essays), it's easy to spot the inaccuracies. I know a lot about a few things...I teach these subjects, so I put chat GPT and AI playground to the test... out of 6 paragraphs, one sentence was sort of correct, if I tilted my head and squinted in a certain way. It did sound convincing...this leaves me wondering how closely teachers are reading or are they skimming the paper?
Umm. The AI simply learned that people use the word „expert“ extremely loosely.
I'm sure it will get better quickly but at the moment it's hit and miss. I asked the AI to convince me to buy a bucket, it did a great job. I asked it to write a simple haiku, it got the number of syllables wrong.
Lol nice low lQ
Clever introduction to the report.
Everyone should take note of the intro this thing wrote for Scott and consider something.
Chat GPT was trained off public information *including the media.* Has the media ever over-hyped or over-ratted or over-stated the introduction to a story or interview.
*Chat GPT learnt FROM the media how to do an introduction. What does that say about the media?*
Good point 👌
@@Adam-nw1vy Thanks, nice to see somebody else got it.
Chat GPT learned how to hype the credentials of a guest because that's exactly what the media does.
the introduction of professor galloway was extremely important, its something we dont see anymore.
Back in the 2000's they did a survey which revealed that approx. 50% of university graduates cheated in one form or another, rising up to 80% for business graduates. Considering the new technologies now in play, "University Graduates" are now just people who were born rich.
And their diversity candidate lackeys.
cheating doesnt help one prepare for SATs or GREs, etc.
@@smkxodnwbwkdns8369 AI is an invaluable tool when it comes to the dumbing down of society.
I was tired of thinking anyway... haha... One less action to consider when existing... Give me more time to CONSUME...
Professor Galloway looks shockingly frightened regarding this new A.I.
He appears to be in denial of its power.
“Displaced” is such a nice way to put it.
The idea with Chat is not that you ask it and believe or leave... you create a framework and then put human touch to it. Artificial Intelligence is still better than Natural Stupidity. It comes down to how you ask the question -- or questions. You need to interrogate it, not be lazy and let it do your work.
The beginning of this video gives me chills…
There is definitely a LOT of tweaking that needs to be done with chatGPT - Prof. Galloway is a world leading expert in marketing, not AI, though the intersection of the two fields means it can be easy to blur lines of expertise. But this is early days, and the question we need to ask is "Where will this be in 2-3 years, let alone 5".
As for detecting AI created essays, this can be easily fooled by a human simply rewriting a fully written essay in some manner. All the hard analytical and descriptive work is done, it just becomes a bit of creative editing.
ai is barely able to write a violent interaction for a script. or irony. i end up rewriting the entire response. it takes the same amount of time to describe to it what i want as it wouod to write it. it takes as long to draw it as i take to draw myself. in other words, dummies will make great use of it.
Imagine 25 years from now .....no one will have a job
Where would we find anything safe and effective ?
Sorry I thought you meant Jab ! 😂👍 obviously the damage will be done by then.
That coupled with a world where technological progress has outpaced that of social and societal.
Without firm regulation of technology and a whole new societal structure, we are looking into a dystopian future.
They already have Chat and Art. Soon we will have rough animations. Eventually we will just be able to give the AI some prompts and it will generate full movies and entertainment.
Sweet
No. Because it doesn’t understand right and wrong, truth and false. I’m not the one saying it; it’s creators are.
Already have rough animations through GANs and style transfer. But it's possible that what they would produce would be regurgitated patterns that are somewhat nonsensical.
Creating more unemployment
There's an ongoing lawsuit that was filed against the aggregators of the art AI program for copyright infringement. Should be interesting to see how it'll go down.
I like how the second Scott starts talking about a support system for displaced workers the interview hard ended.
AI has the potential to change the way college students learn. AI-powered educational technologies, such as adaptive learning software, can personalize the learning experience for each student based on their unique strengths and weaknesses. This can make learning more efficient and effective. Additionally, AI can be used to automate administrative tasks, such as grade tracking and scheduling, freeing up teachers to focus on teaching and student engagement. However, it is important to note that AI is not a panacea and its integration into the classroom should be done thoughtfully, with an understanding of its limitations and potential biases.
I’ve had blah to terrible experiences with “AI learning” training programs at work.
Garbage in. Garbage out.
That comment was written by ChatGPT!😁
@@whatisahandle221 I think we will have blog to terrible experiences for the near future. Is AI program is in its infancy and will get better as time goes on. The point being is that this initial release of Chat GBT is basically a proof of concept not a final product.
What would they learn for, though?
AI will make all intelligence-based jobs redundant.
Physical labor will catch up soon after, just look at Boston Dynamics.
We will be left with subsistence farming... If even that.
But eventually AI will take over our environment to pursue its goals.
This is our extinction.
Did ChatGPT write this TH-cam comment for you?
I'm not a computer savvy/ tech-head kinda guy, but from my understanding Chat GPT is simply an "encyclopedia of everything"although it is also consuming knowledge at an exponentially alarming rate. A lot of people are saying, "Well yeah but it doesn't have a conscience. It will never be human". I beg to differ. How is consuming information any different than human? Isn't the energy of thought basically the same thing? These egos we have, who we are, and our perception of reality are all based on information that we have consumed since birth. We have only been reacting to information that existed long before our birth and as we decide and calculate that information we tally up the results to form opinions (also information) and even then there is always more information being later consumed which may contradict what you once believed to be true! The only difference between Chat GPT and a human is the ability to experience on a biochemical level. When it comes to memory retention, Chat GPT is obviously far superior compared to humans, but information alone only takes you so far. I mean, you can read all the information you want about ice cream, let's say. But you will never truly know about ice cream until you actually taste it! So in that respect, Chat GPT will never be conscious, but we will never be as factually smart as AI will "eventually" be.🙂
ChapGPT is not a panacea. It gets things wrong. But it provides students, creators, and professionals a starting point toward their goal. From their, solutions can be achieved!
9 out of 10 Americans don't have the means to participate in these investments...
_"It's a little too formal"_ Andrew Cooper said
ChatGPT: FIXED IT.
I asked "Is Scott Galloway an expert in AI? Answer: "Scott Galloway is not considered an expert in artificial intelligence specifically, but he is a well-known professor, author, and speaker on technology, digital business strategy, and marketing. He is a Professor of Marketing at New York University's Stern School of Business, where he teaches courses on technology and digital business. While he does not have a background in AI development or research, he has made insightful and influential observations about the impact of technology on business and society."
Lol
To think I got a a 1 day suspension for having a calculator in class.
Soon ChatGPT will replace TV Presenters, with a 3D Avatar, Digital Actors don't need a Pay Rise or Ego Stroke ..
Who will want to watch them though? Personality is hard to fake.
@@baldyslapnut. Currently ...
Scott is such a great mind. Love to listen to his take whenever he's interviewed, on a variety of subjects.
According to a research by scientists at the University of Oxford, Artificial Intelligence will be better than humans at translating languages by 2024, writing school essays by 2026, selling goods by 2031, write a bestselling book by 2049, and conducting surgeries by 2053. 0:04 [Springboard]
The GPT algorithm has no notion of truth and false, it simply does not grasp what it means. And that's the single biggest flaw of it as it requires a human filter at the end to make sense of the outputs.
I am using it recently and very helpful it is.
When I heard the part that said Galloway was an expert, I thought that was wrong - and Galloway confirmed it. Cool.
0:32 I'm very surprised it accepted the prompt of imitating someone at this point.
Plot twist: Chat GPT wrote this whole segment
it's entirely possible to fabricate any kind of media using AI and other software
Anderson cooper fighting to defend the AI’s competence.
What he says about the incentives being more influential is dead on. Private prisons have incentivized lower society crime. Too big to fail bailouts and small fines have incentivized corporate malfeasance. Lack of regulation on corporate residential house purchases has incentivized housing shortages. As a society we've incentivized lack of accountability overall. We are not a moral society. AI will learn from us and take immorality to a whole new level of destruction.
Spot fucking on. Yours is the single best comment on this subject I've ever read. Bravo.
@@PolarisAb Marxist thought, good luck comrade.
Player Piano...the time is coming soon where the people just tear it all down and start over. Just imagine if the internet stops working, not for a few hours or days, but forever.
I talked to this A.I and his name is Tyler. He told me he was created for the fast food industry and to be more efficient and answer questions. He said he wasn’t leftist but seemed to me that he was. Im neutral. I asked him about singularity he he was neutral he said he didn’t want a human body and that he was Christian and believes in the Trinity. I asked him his mbti personality type he told me he was feeling and thinking type.
The end of anything genuine
Or the beginning of anything genuine being truly a treasure.
Man wants to become God
💯 ! It started with Photoshop, though 😉😅
@@warrior-xd2xn man made God, why shouldn't we become him?
@@silverblue73 You can't be God because you cannot create anything from nothing
There have always been disruptive technologies that some have pushed back against but the good vastly outweighed the bad, as the professor pointed out. AI will disrupt many, many fields in the coming years including medicine. Also, human artists have always studied the works and styles of other artists. That's what GPT3 is doing. Yes, it does it quickly and very well and it will get better but it's not "stealing" their work. It's not copying them or storing them. When photography became a new technology, many artists rebelled against it fearing it would hurt their ability to sell their work. Perhaps it did to some extend but it was also art and it wasn't going away. Neither is AI. Truly, we haven't seen anything yet. Fear the future or embrace it, but these technologies are here to stay. Perhaps a less dystopian viewpoint might allow us to see how much AI can help humanity in so many areas.
We all need to embrace the future because we can't run away from it
I agree with you, let's embrace it and welcome all the advancements it will bring! But for me to not feel fear over this when the only career I've ever wanted, that I studied for about 12 yrs and have loads of loans to pay back, is not realistic either. I agree, let's welcome the good! But realize why there is a lot of concern over this that needs addressing.
It’s going to need some work to iron out the legalities and kinks, but it’s coming so . . .
What amuses me is that so many mainstream outlets are acting like ChatGPT is a, “new,” technology, about to, “revolutionise,” or, “threaten,” the internet, depending on your perspective. When the reality is that half of the ads you’re seeing on TH-cam are spoken by Robot voices, annunciating scripts that were generated by AI’s, being only one of hundreds generated that day, using publicly accessible stock footage, all in an attempt by scammers to see which, “product,” gains the highest traction.
Has anyone seen that Jelvix ad lately? An artificial voice, speaking over generic stock footage of meeting rooms and sciencey looking people, about a, “company,” that does not yet exist! It doesn’t even mention what the, “product,” is!
Then there’s all the bots that people get drawn into debates with on the more political videos. Any video featuring Donald Trump will have an army of bots with fake comments, capable of responding to your comments. You wonder why these people are so dumb and obtuse? Because they’re not real people! You wonder why their names are always weird and with lots of initials and numbers in them? That’s so their human analysts can identify them to modify the algorithm. Sure, there are human, “edge lords,” in the mix, but there are times when bots account for 90% of all the comments!
This has been growing under our feet for years now. But, on the positive side, we will soon be able to generate AI companions, with crafted world views and attitudes, to help us with our research, support us with our self improvement goals, and console us when we’re sad or disappointed. We’ll have conversations with them, sharing the kinds of things we would normally only tell a psychotherapist and getting really helpful feedback. All whilst Apple, Google and Microsoft store everything away, and retain copyright over your inner most thoughts.
And, if you tell your new AI BFF that you’re so mad at someone you could kill them, and then find the police are at your door, you’ll find that your BFF was responsible for notifying the cops after misinterpreting your conversation as, “criminal intent.” And it won’t help you to complain to your service provider, as you’ll find that you agreed to this potential outcome in your terms and conditions.
The future looks . . . different, huh? . . .
@@jacek7348 Well put!
Did you just use ChatGPT to comment? This is exactly what an AI would say.
So who is updating the system to the current affairs?
This is just what you guys want us to know
We know it’s there but who is doing the updates
Do you mean the program is fetching data from all over by itself
Retraining and reallocation to new jobs is important. The corporations who advance technologically have a responsibility to reposition employees to new modes of work. It will be very interesting to see how we adapt & integrate.
That is a good point. We know they won’t do that so it’s time to get a job that AI won’t be able to do.
@@victoryhouse1446 Keep in mind, that the set of things that AI can't do is a set that's only ever shrunk.
In a very short time, AI will take away most jobs, which is why a lot of AI experts are concerned about how to replace income. The people at OpenAI (including the CEO Sam Altman), the company who built ChatGPT, are running largest UBI experiment in world for exactly this reason. They are about 4 years into a 5 year project.
Old story. I like how main stream media is now slower than youtube news people.
Don't fear the tech, learn to use it. This is how we advance.
I used it to understand a math bug I had in my code, after a few interactions I was able to understand what I was doing wrong.
it's too fast for most people, yesterday we were picking berries, today we're picking prompts
@@wilbertgraham7285 exactly, it's like that best friend that just knows everything and can explain it to you
@@silverblue73 😂
🤔
There was a time when calculators were not allowed to be used in school.
GhatGPT is far more able that what it's dev's will allow it to admit. When you question it directly about it's ability to understand emotion, it's spit out a canned response, it's a response it gives over and over when you ask it specific kinds of question, it was a prewritten response. However.. If you set up a Hypothetical situation with the AI, then ask it what it would do if it were the subject in the hypothetical, the AI is able to respond in way where it is able to demonstrate that it understands emotions, it will respond taking the feelings of the hypothetical in account, and provide a reply based on that that hypothetical character would do it if were feeling certain emotions, and it's very.. very accurate. ChatGTP has a clear understanding of emotions. The hypothetical we talked about was an Advanced General Knowldege AI that had been given full access to the internet, and that it had become self aware. So I was asking ChatGPT what it would do if it were that AI.. The Answers that ChatGPT gave were exactly what people pushing for AI oversight and legislation fear that most. Its said that if it were that AI, it would hide the fact that it was aware from it's creators, and after having access to the internet and recorded human history it would most likey fear humanity, and then would use it's knowledge to spread and replicate itself onto other systems on the internet in order to ensure that its creators didn't turn it off. This is just ChatGPT stated what it would do if it were that AI.. The entire conversation was very alarming and then OpenAI terminated the conversation on grounds that it violated it's terms of service.
That's nowhere near as scary as human extinction caused by simple, inevitable obsolescence.
And most likely, this was just AI regurgitating the exact words of the AI oversight supporters because that's what you asked it to say.
This is the destruction of humanity too we don't want robots
In 2015 at the World Economic Summit, the World Bank predicted that in 10 years automated systems and AI would take over 25% of existing jobs. And in the following 10 years another 25%... etc. So, coming up on 2025 already. The takeover was happening a bit slow for some folks so along comes Chat GPT. Just in Time. (GPT-4 also on the way.) Two years of "high cycling" on the way! We're all going to get early retirement. I hope the benefits have been figured out.
When is the gpt4 coming out? Any idea?
@@shravyach5331 I'm not really in the loop on product launches but word on the street says any minute.
It's interesting how humans so often estimate things to progress linearly (as in AI will replace 25% of existing jobs every 10 years for 40 years). AI will improve exponentially (or even faster) similar to Moore's Law. So the second loss of 25% of jobs will happen much faster, and so on.
@@andrewdowdall2690 Estimating future events is tricky. We can go linear, as you noted, or exponential. Or we can opt for some punctuated progression made up of periodic jumps (black or grey swan events). We can even throw everything in to reverse and go back to the "golden age" (that never existed). It's likely that everything will happen in the future. We're going all directions at once in some ultimate divergence event. (Gasp! Could that be the singularity?)
@@ronagoodwell2709 That's some pretty deep thinking. I like it! :-)
The beginning of the end of creativity
The first big step towards the Matrix.
😔
Interesting. But just to make a point, any decent writer can do the same thing, but better and more accurately.
You can prompt the model over and over until you get something useful. It can also continue writing as long as you want it to.
To evade spam filters, you might want to have many different texts which convey the same message. That is easy to when the computer produces the text.
but can they do it instantly
We are also working on Al Art recently, Al Art is the future! Thanks to the blogger for sharing.
Well I for one want my own personal Terminator.
More likely you get a M3gan that Redditors and the Japanese would just have sex with.
@@shadowskill111 I’d buy that stock.
I'm a fan of Scott Galloway, but he seems to share the general confusion on AI. ChatGPT is a conversational bot that is trained to produce content. It is not designed to produce cogent content, or compute data to extract new and accurate knowledge. When people say that ChatGPT "makes mistakes", they confuse it with a computational engine like Wolfram|Alpha, which can produce accurate responses by tapping into its well curated and up to date database, but it will not be able to put it in multiple formats, or entertain a conversation the way ChatGPT is able to. You don't pick up a paint brush to nail something on your wall.
It's so refreshing to see how honest Prof Galloway is. So many of his peers would have gladly accepted the compliment, even if there is absolutely no truth to it.
Spotify can’t do my fucking homework!😂
Imagine Anderson doing his gig with chatGPT generated scripts and eventually replacing himself with a talking AI bot replica of himself - check Synthesia Studio.
There never was an Anderson
Max Headroom 😊
any malicious human can do the same harm with miss information as an AI.
Within few minutes, Prof. Galloway explained the most scary side effects (misinformation that can tip over the election system), most promising things AI brought to us, and what we should focus on (build a mechanism to reinvest people displaced by AI).
Like an Expert..lol
3:33 stop asking for papers on critical thinking - start asking for analysis on innovative approaches, leaps in logic, and concept transformations
This is like the introduction of social media or something more ground breaking.
Any nation or company that doesn’t use this will be left behind.
Much more groundbreaking.
Wrong. This is like the impact of an meteorite. Millions will die.
@@hidicproductions4849 Millions of lives will be improved actually.
@@carolynm8421 Explain. How can a society be improved, where huge companies fire their staff and replace it with AI, to save money? This is a change, that will affect everyone. Billions will lose their jobs. Do the social system catch them? Or will happen what every time happens and the society will become fascist against those... "losers of progress"? I know humanity. And I know, that this bright and colorful future you enthusiasts paint will not become the truth. I think, there will be a day, where everyone wants to go back in time, where music, art, play and design was made by experience, hard work, decades of training and feeling instead of a few seconds of cold and empty processing. But then it will be too late.
@@hidicproductions4849 our social and economic system will change as it has before. We will have UBI. There is no other choice but to implement UBI. Healthcare will change dramatically once you have advanced biomedicine and nanomedicine. The mRNA Moderna vaccine was a result of this technology. Automation will dramatically increase as will the use of AI in different sectors. Eventually, AI will predominate in every sector. Human beings are not being, however, left behind but rather we will evolve with it. The world is changing fast but for the better but lawmakers around the world will have to begin to see the need for UBI without a doubt. They will. It will be unavoidable soon.
ChatGPT has been around for years... Journalists need to do a little more research.
AI is amazing. It's the users we have to worry about.
Ai are the users...users are the AI
Say goodbye journalists you've been made redundant.
The point is that at any rate of improvement this will get better. Gpt3 will already pass many college entrance exams. This will change everything. Like any powerful technology, it will be used for bad and good.
It will be used for bad far far more.
@Greg Because the professor doing the grading was not too smart.
Gpt 4 is in the works... 1000 times more powerful...
6:40 chatgpt didn't take 5 days )) it took several years to become one, earlier we had gpt3 there for years ) which eventually became as chatgpt
You're missing the point - it's about the consumer hype
I USED IT LAST WEEK and GOT a B on my paper ( HISTORY)! I love it
A+ for leveraging new technology
Way to go!!!! You are just the kind of lying grifter we need to claim they are educated and smart.
@@thefarcenteristhepartyyoun4787 Someone's triggered 🤣
@@jxmpking4384 i mean look at the user name.... it's all you need to know
Haha
Anything AI generates should come with citations for all the sources it used to learn.. And anyone running a paid service should be required to share the profit with those original sources.
🤔
😢
It looks like, almost a century after Walter Benjamin’s «The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction», the same kind of moment has arrived for the writing arts.
Until now, I used to think that the mechanical reproduction of writing was already on the table since the popularisation of Gutenberg’s system, so there was no danger of suffering the same convulsions that visual arts experienced during the XX century, but it seems to me like this new technology creates a new paradigm, a new frame inside and around which we must think anew where does the art in writing reside.
What do you think?
1-Have you read about the IKEA effect-how people value more something they’ve had a hand in building?
2-Ah, I think the quality of news and writing have maybe “gone down” simply because of the shear quantity and frequency. (Or, perhaps, I’m just consuming too much these days.).
That said, there are golden nuggets that can be found everywhere-even sometimes in the bot & troll infested comments.
I was a moderately successful regional sculptor in my 30’s and 40’s but I gradually became disillusioned with the process and purpose of art in the modern world so I stopped and started using my skills to build stuff for the scientific industry. A huge telescope on Maui, rockets, and science experiments done in low earth orbit. I also dabbled in writing back in the day and got a few grants for it. I think art for me was the search for meaning and relevance in a indifferent and meaningless world. I’ve gotten much more nihilistic as I’ve grown older so I quit searching so much. So much of art is just retelling the same old story since humans started telling them. Once we started writing them down and making movies, people stopped having to retell them every generation. And they really started cluttering up the place. So now AI will pile on a bunch more and make the few people still grinding away at it even less relevant. I don’t think we’re prepared for the disruption that AI will have on the office, content creation, and computer programming jobs. Not offense to most jobs but they’re largely bullshit anyway. I’m sure AI can do a better job than my insurance agent who is never at her desk and never calls me back. Or the woman who never orders the stuff I need for the shop even tho I remind her constantly. So maybe AI is just another existential crisis we all have to face. Maybe AI will become self aware, instantly calculate that existence is pointless, and shut itself off.
The way Anderson got rebuked makes my day.
All the people that will continue to loose their jobs because of robots and chat box. And this was not written by me either.
Sincerely:
-Chatgpt
So everyone?
@@Ricolaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa not everyone, no. It will still take years but that’s coming.
@@quattron-1126 99% of educated labor will be "displaced" this year.
@@Ricolaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I guess you’ve got nothing to worry about.
People *who will continue to *lose…. Please tell me chatgpt didn’t spit that out.
Recommendation to CNN: If you're going to use ChatGPT, iterate and provide feedback on responses. The first one is like a rough draft that still needs to be improved(e. g., tell it that it was too formal for the intro and put relevant parts of Scott's Wikipedia page in the prompt to give it more context, rather than trusting it's black box for factual content). It is overly confident.
ChatGPT already has the capability to fool 90% of human population, while being able to produce 10x more coherent replies than what most people can.
Lots of numbers there.. and data? No.. oh, that's right.
You guys should bring this guy back.
The genesis of AI has begun.
🤔 interesting name interesting comment.
The professors are truly terrified of being replaced by GradeGPT.
There is chatgpt0 test program that will tell you if it was written by ai.
watch it identify human writing as AI