Such indirect reciprocity rating systems lift the game to the next level where upvoting and downvoting somebody is in itself cooperation and defection. Mind Lacie, the character from Black Mirror series. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosedive_(Black_Mirror)
What happens when a defector builds a track record of defection and co-operation with in a group implementing a generous tit for tat system? my thoughts are the group would change strategy's, eventually defecting for a set of terns regardless if the individual begins to engage in consistent co-operation. the sum of terns would be dependent on the groups satisfaction of the generosity and until the individual defects on the groups defection, engaging in a basic tit for tat system and eventually generous tit for tat with group co-operation and reintegration. That or the individual leaves the group with there new stratagy, fully conscientious of the group dynamic with the intention to find a new healthy group to engage with tit for tat, then generous tit for tat.. its also possible the individual would be avers to group systems from then on, or are a dedicated defector who engages in manipulation.
For the source references of this video, you can find them in the article on our site at goo.gl/pbyGTT
Totally awesome, as always with you! Thanks!
Such indirect reciprocity rating systems lift the game to the next level where upvoting and downvoting somebody is in itself cooperation and defection. Mind Lacie, the character from Black Mirror series.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosedive_(Black_Mirror)
What happens when a defector builds a track record of defection and co-operation with in a group implementing a generous tit for tat system? my thoughts are the group would change strategy's, eventually defecting for a set of terns regardless if the individual begins to engage in consistent co-operation. the sum of terns would be dependent on the groups satisfaction of the generosity and until the individual defects on the groups defection, engaging in a basic tit for tat system and eventually generous tit for tat with group co-operation and reintegration. That or the individual leaves the group with there new stratagy, fully conscientious of the group dynamic with the intention to find a new healthy group to engage with tit for tat, then generous tit for tat.. its also possible the individual would be avers to group systems from then on, or are a dedicated defector who engages in manipulation.
Impeccable explanation
Thanks for making this!
Thanks very much.
It seemed more like an ethical topic rather than a lecture in computer science.
Nicely explained though!
1:46
uh.. this knowlage about game theory wears kinda heavy on me
Are we to infer that we can spot defectors by their wearing of neck ties. What are you trying to tell us here?
excellent.
thanks
wow
Hey we got a sticker it fits everywhere