Alhamdulillah, I’m an FSA licensed halal slaughter man in the UK. There are so many halal slaughterhouses in the UK and is growing consistently as our faith is growing in the UK and around the west.
I'm in the uk too. Tell me please, do all halal slaughter houses me mention the name of allah and then cut the throat of the animal without stunning? Also, what do non halal slaughterhouses do that's different aside from mentioning Allah's name?
@ I’m not sure about other slaughterhouses but I can confirm that We are a non-stun halal slaughter house. I’ve never seen or been in a non halal place so I can’t really say what the differences are.
1) sahaba ate meat from people they knew personally. 1400 years ago, ppl were living in small villages. everyone knew everyone. the people they were eating from did not span entire continents from 1 ocean to the next. nor were they behemoth corporations. the people slaughtering animals were individuals and tribes. not factories and assembly lines with employees of 40 different nationalities and religions. 2) food was scarce back then. so necessity played a role in not wasting food. 3) Christian and jews 1400 years ago were practising Christian and jews. not in fake name only. the quran says to marry chaste women from the book. not any women from the book. 4) the west is not a Christian country. they are all secular atheists. 5) no, it is not in usa constitution that the president need to be a Christian. 6) majority of people in western countries are not Christians or jews or Muslims. 7) the size of nations means there is no way of knowing anything about the food and who killed it, unlike 1400 years ago. when ppl knew exactly who owned the animal, raised the animal and then killed it and gave it to them. 8) stunning has been shown to kill 30% of animals before slaughter 9) corporations do not care about Christianity and are not Christians even if the country is Christian, and no the countries are not Christian 10) the prophet pbuh said scholars in the end of times would make haram things and alcohol permissible. 11) this sheikh has also quoted another sheikh saying 3% alcohol is not alcohol, even though western governments consider it alcoholic, in another video of his. 11) this kind of loose interpretation of the conditions for halal and haram, is fulfilling the prophecy of the prophet pbuh 12) no you do not need to do an interrogation to find out if someone is Christian or Muslim. you take it at face value. but if that face value is them eating pork, doing zina, doing drugs, never going church, getting tattoos, practising riba usury, abortions, committing adultery, legalisiing lgtbq, endorsing gay marriage, practicing homosexuality, then that face value is they are not people of the book. And you cannot take them as such. You don't need to interrogate them, when they are blaring it out from everywhere that they are not people of the book anymore.
11) this sheikh has also quoted another sheikh saying 3% alcohol is not alcohol, even though western governments consider it alcoholic, in another video of his. don't speak disrespectfully and the government doesn't define this in this case muslims are terrorist according to ur terminology.
the last point is very strong dont eat such meat, just eat fish and other sea animals as they dont have such restrictions although the small amount of food and people and times have changed is all weak. you shall also know that the quran is timeless. jbasically, eat da meat saying bismillah unless you know it is haram
And that's why when i got a chance to go to canada, I'm only eat fish in fast food. If there's halal certificates, it's free real estate, if there's not just buy fish products.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong, the same Hadith was also narrated in Abu Dawud and there it was said the people who sent the meat were newly converted Muslims. So this Hadith is not talking about the people of the book.
The seperation of church and state in USA was meant to assure that the state would not infringe upon the rights of the church, not the other way around as many (even americans) believe.
It won’t make any sense to you. But just as the sheikh mentioned (no I don’t mean that you were not listening) you just don’t eat in Christian countries.
it is well known that if u consider zins to not be zins it makes you a non dis beliber in faith. ppl in opposite of east, do not consider the listed stuff that gets this comment deleted, to be zins anymore. therefore they aren't people of the book anymore.
In europe its still haram for example because slaughtering is illegal there Its only allowed for religious slaughtering and you have to get a certificate for that Every other meat has to be dead meat
@@aliioii2712I don’t live in America so I don’t care about the rulings in that specific country. But you mentioned that the current Christian population in America is 71% which would constitute a majority. Now we also have Jews and Muslims we can eat from so that would be more than 71% percent.
@@leun6768 yes 1) sahaba ate meat from people they knew personally. 1400 years ago, ppl were living in small villages. everyone knew everyone. the people they were eating from did not span entire continents from 1 ocean to the next. nor were they behemoth corporations. the people slaughtering animals were individuals and tribes. not factories and assembly lines with employees of 40 different nationalities and religions. 2) food was scarce back then. so necessity played a role in not wasting food. 3) Christian and jews 1400 years ago were practising Christian and jews. not in fake name only. the quran says to marry chaste women from the book. not any women from the book. 4) the west is not a Christian country. they are all secular atheists. 5) no, it is not in usa constitution that the president need to be a Christian. 6) majority of people in western countries are not Christians or jews or Muslims. 7) the size of nations means there is no way of knowing anything about the food and who killed it, unlike 1400 years ago. when ppl knew exactly who owned the animal, raised the animal and then killed it and gave it to them. 8) stunning has been shown to kill 30% of animals before slaughter 9) corporations do not care about Christianity and are not Christians even if the country is Christian, and no the countries are not Christian 10) the prophet pbuh said scholars in the end of times would make haram things and alcohol permissible. 11) this sheikh has also said 3% alcohol is not alcohol, even though western governments consider it alcoholic, in another video of his. 11) this kind of loose interpretation of the conditions for halal and haram, is fulfilling the prophecy of the prophet pbuh 12) no you do not need to do an interrogation to find out if someone is Christian or Muslim. you take it at face value. but if that face value is them eating pork, doing zina, doing drugs, never going church, getting tattoos, practising riba usury, abortions, committing adultery, legalisiing lgtbq, endorsing gay marriage, practicing homosexuality, then that face value is they are not people of the book. And you cannot take them as such. You don't need to interrogate them, when they are blaring it out from everywhere that they are not people of the book anymore.
@ So if it’s 95% percent it’s okay but if it’s 71% percent it isn’t? Your logic doesn’t make sense. And “negligible” isn’t 95% if you have taken a statistics course. Also remind me if Ibn Uthaymeen or Ibn Baz said anything about the percentage of Christians. As far as I know they never knew about how many Christians there were, they only cared about it being an overall Christian country.
@@leun6768 you are criticising him for 95% and 71% percent. but are using the exact same argument. what do u consider a Christian country then? 51% the fact is west isn't Christian country. and the sheikhs are wrong.
The woman is speaking utter nonsense. A friend of mine has a chicken slaughter house and chickens are taken of the truck and put straight on the conveyor belt where they are slaughtered with a blade. So nail guns I can’t believe.also I’ve seen lamb/sheep been slaughtered. The law in the uk is to stun (ie electrocute) the animal by means of putting an electric tongue on the sides of the temple. This does not kill the animal but only stuns it so it’s easier to slaughter. Regarding cows I’ve seen the slaughter house fire (at close range ) a metal rod in the middle of the temple. This again stuns the cow so easier to slaughter. I’m speaking of slaughtering in the uk. Above all of this we, as Muslims cannot go against the ayah of Surah Maidah(the table spread). Ameen. So the noble Sheikh is speaking totally correct Inshaalah.
i live in the uk my dad said that many slaughter houses do slaughter for chickens, so basically i can eat chicken meat ducks from supermarkets? thank u honestly
Sheikh explained it so precisely and logically! - although I don’t eat at fast food anyway but now I know that I can. To all those people who are stilling confused, too bad! - if explanation would make sense to everyone than we would not have anyone in those world worshipping cow, graves and idols.
If one message foundation is your favorite channel, then go see what Shaykh Uthman says about this. You listen to a person and don't do your own research, very silly.
It is shirk, but it was also shirk back then when it was deemed permissible to eat their meat. An-Nisa 4:171 says the christians believed Isa is son of God and in the trinity
I have seen this issue addressed by the Sheikh in many videos and that’s what I figured: This is not a fatwa rather a default ruling by the Sheikh, when prophet Mohammad PBUH didn’t ask the history of the meat then all the arguments were shut forever. Secondly, other islamic scholars are trying to make it a law to not eat from Jews and Christains whereas there is nothing found against it in both the Quran and the Sunnah as explained by the Sheikh. Someone’s preference to not eat is not against the default ruling but the ruling will stand. I hope this clears all the confusion.
it is well known that if u consider sins to not be sins it makes you a kfir in islam. even if you profess to be a Muslim. Christians and jews in West do not consider homosexuality, lgbtq, usury, adultery, zina, pork, abortions, drugs, tattoos to be sins anymore. therefore they aren't people of the book anymore.
@aliioii2712 they are desperate to eat haram. so they pick and choose the rulings from sheikhs to suit them. no point. i couldn't get through to these fools. as they love their McDonald's too much. instead they constantly wanted to argue semantics and exact terminology of a side point i was making instead of dealing with the 12points i made. All they respect is if u r an arab sheikh from saudi. as they think islam is a religion of blind obedience to the saudi race, and not of intelligence.
@@ManlykeRehan Saying Bismillah before eating is Sunnah, but in this case we must not forget to say it. In addition, in my opinion, it is better to say: Allahummaghfirli in case I am wrong. This is because Allah says in the Qur'an that He will forgive if it cannot be avoided :)
Halal or not, we should boycott IsraeHell products anyway. Boycott Starbucks, McDonald's etc.
Yes, and some claim to be Christians or jews but still abuse animals in such a way where it is so sad and disgusting. There are many proofs of this.
Exactly why are they still eating from there... most people have no morals anymore ...
Alhamdulillah, I’m an FSA licensed halal slaughter man in the UK.
There are so many halal slaughterhouses in the UK and is growing consistently as our faith is growing in the UK and around the west.
I'm in the uk too. Tell me please, do all halal slaughter houses me mention the name of allah and then cut the throat of the animal without stunning?
Also, what do non halal slaughterhouses do that's different aside from mentioning Allah's name?
@
I’m not sure about other slaughterhouses but I can confirm that We are a non-stun halal slaughter house.
I’ve never seen or been in a non halal place so I can’t really say what the differences are.
Where are you based in the U.K. brother? Because we are in London
@
Manchester
1) sahaba ate meat from people they knew personally. 1400 years ago, ppl were living in small villages. everyone knew everyone. the people they were eating from did not span entire continents from 1 ocean to the next. nor were they behemoth corporations. the people slaughtering animals were individuals and tribes. not factories and assembly lines with employees of 40 different nationalities and religions.
2) food was scarce back then. so necessity played a role in not wasting food.
3) Christian and jews 1400 years ago were practising Christian and jews. not in fake name only. the quran says to marry chaste women from the book. not any women from the book.
4) the west is not a Christian country. they are all secular atheists.
5) no, it is not in usa constitution that the president need to be a Christian.
6) majority of people in western countries are not Christians or jews or Muslims.
7) the size of nations means there is no way of knowing anything about the food and who killed it, unlike 1400 years ago. when ppl knew exactly who owned the animal, raised the animal and then killed it and gave it to them.
8) stunning has been shown to kill 30% of animals before slaughter
9) corporations do not care about Christianity and are not Christians even if the country is Christian, and no the countries are not Christian
10) the prophet pbuh said scholars in the end of times would make haram things and alcohol permissible.
11) this sheikh has also quoted another sheikh saying 3% alcohol is not alcohol, even though western governments consider it alcoholic, in another video of his.
11) this kind of loose interpretation of the conditions for halal and haram, is fulfilling the prophecy of the prophet pbuh
12) no you do not need to do an interrogation to find out if someone is Christian or Muslim. you take it at face value. but if that face value is them eating pork, doing zina, doing drugs, never going church, getting tattoos, practising riba usury, abortions, committing adultery, legalisiing lgtbq, endorsing gay marriage, practicing homosexuality, then that face value is they are not people of the book. And you cannot take them as such.
You don't need to interrogate them, when they are blaring it out from everywhere that they are not people of the book anymore.
11) this sheikh has also quoted another sheikh saying 3% alcohol is not alcohol, even though western governments consider it alcoholic, in another video of his.
don't speak disrespectfully and the government doesn't define this in this case muslims are terrorist according to ur terminology.
@darknight129 idjiot
@darknight129 speaking factually is not speaking disrespectfully. it's your problem if you have an ego.
the last point is very strong
dont eat such meat, just eat fish and other sea animals as they dont have such restrictions
although the small amount of food and people and times have changed is all weak. you shall also know that the quran is timeless.
jbasically, eat da meat saying bismillah unless you know it is haram
Refrain from speaking without knowledge brother, what you are doing is very dangerous.
And that's why when i got a chance to go to canada, I'm only eat fish in fast food. If there's halal certificates, it's free real estate, if there's not just buy fish products.
lobster and other seafood too!
8:34 No, this is false. The constitution allows people of any religion to hold political office.
It's probably just a mistake
Someone please correct me if I am wrong, the same Hadith was also narrated in Abu Dawud and there it was said the people who sent the meat were newly converted Muslims. So this Hadith is not talking about the people of the book.
I'm gonna go ahead and trust the sheikh on that one
The seperation of church and state in USA was meant to assure that the state would not infringe upon the rights of the church, not the other way around as many (even americans) believe.
The answer doesn't make sense to me.
May Almighty Allah help you he saying the true
It won’t make any sense to you.
But just as the sheikh mentioned (no I don’t mean that you were not listening) you just don’t eat in Christian countries.
Ok cool
it is well known that if u consider zins to not be zins it makes you a non dis beliber in faith.
ppl in opposite of east, do not consider the listed stuff that gets this comment deleted, to be zins anymore. therefore they aren't people of the book anymore.
Listen. IF, you don’t want, then DONT. Good for you!
This is not true where the president has to be Christian.
The countries mentioned don’t identify under any religion as wouldn’t be fair to prefer one other than an other
In europe its still haram for example because slaughtering is illegal there
Its only allowed for religious slaughtering and you have to get a certificate for that
Every other meat has to be dead meat
terrible logic
So you’re saying that the fatwas of Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen and Ibn Baz are terrible?
@@aliioii2712I don’t live in America so I don’t care about the rulings in that specific country. But you mentioned that the current Christian population in America is 71% which would constitute a majority. Now we also have Jews and Muslims we can eat from so that would be more than 71% percent.
@@leun6768 yes
1) sahaba ate meat from people they knew personally. 1400 years ago, ppl were living in small villages. everyone knew everyone. the people they were eating from did not span entire continents from 1 ocean to the next. nor were they behemoth corporations. the people slaughtering animals were individuals and tribes. not factories and assembly lines with employees of 40 different nationalities and religions.
2) food was scarce back then. so necessity played a role in not wasting food.
3) Christian and jews 1400 years ago were practising Christian and jews. not in fake name only. the quran says to marry chaste women from the book. not any women from the book.
4) the west is not a Christian country. they are all secular atheists.
5) no, it is not in usa constitution that the president need to be a Christian.
6) majority of people in western countries are not Christians or jews or Muslims.
7) the size of nations means there is no way of knowing anything about the food and who killed it, unlike 1400 years ago. when ppl knew exactly who owned the animal, raised the animal and then killed it and gave it to them.
8) stunning has been shown to kill 30% of animals before slaughter
9) corporations do not care about Christianity and are not Christians even if the country is Christian, and no the countries are not Christian
10) the prophet pbuh said scholars in the end of times would make haram things and alcohol permissible.
11) this sheikh has also said 3% alcohol is not alcohol, even though western governments consider it alcoholic, in another video of his.
11) this kind of loose interpretation of the conditions for halal and haram, is fulfilling the prophecy of the prophet pbuh
12) no you do not need to do an interrogation to find out if someone is Christian or Muslim. you take it at face value. but if that face value is them eating pork, doing zina, doing drugs, never going church, getting tattoos, practising riba usury, abortions, committing adultery, legalisiing lgtbq, endorsing gay marriage, practicing homosexuality, then that face value is they are not people of the book. And you cannot take them as such.
You don't need to interrogate them, when they are blaring it out from everywhere that they are not people of the book anymore.
@ So if it’s 95% percent it’s okay but if it’s 71% percent it isn’t? Your logic doesn’t make sense. And “negligible” isn’t 95% if you have taken a statistics course. Also remind me if Ibn Uthaymeen or Ibn Baz said anything about the percentage of Christians. As far as I know they never knew about how many Christians there were, they only cared about it being an overall Christian country.
@@leun6768 you are criticising him for 95% and 71% percent. but are using the exact same argument. what do u consider a Christian country then? 51%
the fact is west isn't Christian country. and the sheikhs are wrong.
The woman is speaking utter nonsense. A friend of mine has a chicken slaughter house and chickens are taken of the truck and put straight on the conveyor belt where they are slaughtered with a blade. So nail guns I can’t believe.also I’ve seen lamb/sheep been slaughtered. The law in the uk is to stun (ie electrocute) the animal by means of putting an electric tongue on the sides of the temple. This does not kill the animal but only stuns it so it’s easier to slaughter.
Regarding cows I’ve seen the slaughter house fire (at close range ) a metal rod in the middle of the temple. This again stuns the cow so easier to slaughter. I’m speaking of slaughtering in the uk.
Above all of this we, as Muslims cannot go against the ayah of Surah Maidah(the table spread). Ameen. So the noble Sheikh is speaking totally correct Inshaalah.
i live in the uk my dad said that many slaughter houses do slaughter for chickens, so basically i can eat chicken meat ducks from supermarkets? thank u honestly
There are many places we're they abuse the animals before or at the slaughtering..it's very sad.
Sheikh explained it so precisely and logically! - although I don’t eat at fast food anyway but now I know that I can.
To all those people who are stilling confused, too bad! - if explanation would make sense to everyone than we would not have anyone in those world worshipping cow, graves and idols.
Dont all fast food places in west serve pork so you cant eat anyways?
If one message foundation is your favorite channel, then go see what Shaykh Uthman says about this. You listen to a person and don't do your own research, very silly.
@@Asad-hp3vrno, at least not in the UK
Christian country? - Shirk because they believe in 3 gods in one
It is shirk, but it was also shirk back then when it was deemed permissible to eat their meat. An-Nisa 4:171 says the christians believed Isa is son of God and in the trinity
I have seen this issue addressed by the Sheikh in many videos and that’s what I figured:
This is not a fatwa rather a default ruling by the Sheikh, when prophet Mohammad PBUH didn’t ask the history of the meat then all the arguments were shut forever. Secondly, other islamic scholars are trying to make it a law to not eat from Jews and Christains whereas there is nothing found against it in both the Quran and the Sunnah as explained by the Sheikh. Someone’s preference to not eat is not against the default ruling but the ruling will stand. I hope this clears all the confusion.
it is well known that if u consider sins to not be sins it makes you a kfir in islam. even if you profess to be a Muslim.
Christians and jews in West do not consider homosexuality, lgbtq, usury, adultery, zina, pork, abortions, drugs, tattoos to be sins anymore.
therefore they aren't people of the book anymore.
@aliioii2712 they are desperate to eat haram. so they pick and choose the rulings from sheikhs to suit them. no point. i couldn't get through to these fools. as they love their McDonald's too much. instead they constantly wanted to argue semantics and exact terminology of a side point i was making instead of dealing with the 12points i made. All they respect is if u r an arab sheikh from saudi. as they think islam is a religion of blind obedience to the saudi race, and not of intelligence.
A pragmatic and rational approach - but we must say Bismillah before eating to make it halal in case it is not :)
Heh?
@@ManlykeRehan Saying Bismillah before eating is Sunnah, but in this case we must not forget to say it. In addition, in my opinion, it is better to say: Allahummaghfirli in case I am wrong. This is because Allah says in the Qur'an that He will forgive if it cannot be avoided :)
Christian believe in the Trinity, how can you eat there meat.
Sheikh can you testify in front Allah that eating at McDonalds is Halal
lol it's literally in the quran black on white that you can eat the meat of the people of the book, do you not believe in your own book?
So you Know better then the Book itself??
Your so lost
After reading this comment, Houston we have a Problem!
If you deny the verses in the Quran you have a big problem