If chelsea were in such a position as arsenal, we would either have won the league or the CL. It's in the DNA of clubs. Else ask urself why madrid wins the CL, whever they get a half-decent team!
i admit im biased towards chelsea, i dont think he's completely wrong if your talking in 3 years plus, youngest squad in the league with vast amount of potential, whereas Liverpool have the best team currently, but if those contracts don't get sorted by Liverpool, which we know TAA is definitely leaving, you really think FSG are going to replace all 3 players and spend what they would have to spend. VVD and salah are getting on a bit too so if we are talking 3 plus years, they will be 35 and 36. it really;y bdoes depend how ambitious are liverpools owners, if they are wanting to win big things then there's 100% a case for Liverpool blowing chelsea away but honestly how many times have we seen them not spend money when they need, its lucky Slot is a great manager that saw the ability gravenberch has in the 6 position because if they didn't we'd still be talking about how they still hadn't replaced fabinho.
Van dijk and Salah could play for another 4 years still l(VVD could probs play till like 39) there is no one we could sign in summer that would be as good as those 2 very important they resign or we will be worse next season
Liverpool beat Chelsea in every single department. Anyone saying otherwise is clearly biased towards Chelsea. I dont like either club, but if i was a player i wouldnt dare go to Chelsea over liverpool, in fact, i think Chelsea are being massively overrated right now. They've had a great start to the season, but i think the feel good factor will soon ware off, and they will struggle to get top 4 imho.
Hmm that's why top 2 young midfielders joined us by rejecting them.. This is whilst we're building the team and they are on top. Don't bother talking about money being the deciding factor either...neither Lavia or Caicedo are getting an exorbitant amount
You really need to learn some basic facts regarding the history of Chelsea before making such an ignorant statement. Chelsea has won trophies in every decade apart from the 80’s since the 50’s. Have broken records in European football. English league and cup competitions. The record attendance figures for two decades. The 2nd highest league attendance figure in English football in a domestic ground. The only club that has held a number of other international sporting events including rugby cricket boxing American football baseball greyhound racing and domestic cup finals was at Stamford Bridge. So what history are you referring to?
@ you won very little compared to the real big clubs the odd cup in every five years before the dirty money came in yeah a real big club who don’t own their own ground you still pay rent to play on it lol
@ I’m a little bit confused on what you consider a big team. Do you mean the teams that have been involved in the biggest football scandals and corruption in the league’s history. The only ones that have had players banned for life for match fixing. The other one that has been involved in two of the worst incidents in football resulting in every other team being banned from playing European competitions. You saying that Chelsea doesn’t own the ground is laughable. The fact that the freehold is owned by the Chelsea Pitch Owners to protect the ground from being sold to developers is a big deal to have your own fans have such a big control in the existence of the club. The only club that has actually won European trophies against the biggest clubs in Europe compared to the opposition that was being played against by the so called big clubs that you talk about
@ what you writing a novel get a life or come back when you have 20 titles and 6 champions leagues come back when you own you’re own ground come back when your silverware is over 68 cups come back when you got real history lol
For his own development as a player Liverpool are the better option Liverpool turn more players into legends than Chelsea also didn't Liverpools academy beat that billion dollar team in a cup final over long term Liverpool are still the better choice
@@zp5991 your young players have been playing top level football for years our youngsters that game have not plus Van dijk and Endo raises the age thing due to being in their 30s
I heard that from Arsenal two years ago
If chelsea were in such a position as arsenal, we would either have won the league or the CL. It's in the DNA of clubs. Else ask urself why madrid wins the CL, whever they get a half-decent team!
i admit im biased towards chelsea, i dont think he's completely wrong if your talking in 3 years plus, youngest squad in the league with vast amount of potential, whereas Liverpool have the best team currently, but if those contracts don't get sorted by Liverpool, which we know TAA is definitely leaving, you really think FSG are going to replace all 3 players and spend what they would have to spend. VVD and salah are getting on a bit too so if we are talking 3 plus years, they will be 35 and 36. it really;y bdoes depend how ambitious are liverpools owners, if they are wanting to win big things then there's 100% a case for Liverpool blowing chelsea away but honestly how many times have we seen them not spend money when they need, its lucky Slot is a great manager that saw the ability gravenberch has in the 6 position because if they didn't we'd still be talking about how they still hadn't replaced fabinho.
Van dijk and Salah could play for another 4 years still l(VVD could probs play till like 39) there is no one we could sign in summer that would be as good as those 2 very important they resign or we will be worse next season
Terry please clip the statement of who will win more trophies over the next 5 years. I just wan see something please... 😁
Liverpool beat Chelsea in every single department. Anyone saying otherwise is clearly biased towards Chelsea. I dont like either club, but if i was a player i wouldnt dare go to Chelsea over liverpool, in fact, i think Chelsea are being massively overrated right now. They've had a great start to the season, but i think the feel good factor will soon ware off, and they will struggle to get top 4 imho.
Coming from an assna fan😂😂 👏👏
Hmm that's why top 2 young midfielders joined us by rejecting them..
This is whilst we're building the team and they are on top.
Don't bother talking about money being the deciding factor either...neither Lavia or Caicedo are getting an exorbitant amount
Bro this don guy is fluent in yapaness
Delusional Chelaea fans😂😂😂 How Chelsea in Long or short term?? Pls elaborate 😅
What a clown Chelsea laughing stock you won with dirty money and got away with it you got no history before mourinhio
Really and so what?!😂😂😂
You really need to learn some basic facts regarding the history of Chelsea before making such an ignorant statement. Chelsea has won trophies in every decade apart from the 80’s since the 50’s. Have broken records in European football. English league and cup competitions. The record attendance figures for two decades. The 2nd highest league attendance figure in English football in a domestic ground. The only club that has held a number of other international sporting events including rugby cricket boxing American football baseball greyhound racing and domestic cup finals was at Stamford Bridge. So what history are you referring to?
@ you won very little compared to the real big clubs the odd cup in every five years before the dirty money came in yeah a real big club who don’t own their own ground you still pay rent to play on it lol
@ I’m a little bit confused on what you consider a big team. Do you mean the teams that have been involved in the biggest football scandals and corruption in the league’s history. The only ones that have had players banned for life for match fixing. The other one that has been involved in two of the worst incidents in football resulting in every other team being banned from playing European competitions. You saying that Chelsea doesn’t own the ground is laughable. The fact that the freehold is owned by the Chelsea Pitch Owners to protect the ground from being sold to developers is a big deal to have your own fans have such a big control in the existence of the club. The only club that has actually won European trophies against the biggest clubs in Europe compared to the opposition that was being played against by the so called big clubs that you talk about
@ what you writing a novel get a life or come back when you have 20 titles and 6 champions leagues come back when you own you’re own ground come back when your silverware is over 68 cups come back when you got real history lol
For his own development as a player Liverpool are the better option Liverpool turn more players into legends than Chelsea also didn't Liverpools academy beat that billion dollar team in a cup final over long term Liverpool are still the better choice
Liverpool team was older than Chelsea in that final
@@zp5991 Jackson and Galla costed Chelsea in that final they had better chances than Liverpool
Dream on😅
@@zp5991 your young players have been playing top level football for years our youngsters that game have not plus Van dijk and Endo raises the age thing due to being in their 30s
Fans of London clubs there so adorable 👀 😂