2018 / 2019 Toyota Sequoia - When Dinosaurs Roamed The Earth
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- With the America's addiction to crossovers at a fever pitch, many shoppers seem to have forgotten that traditional body-on-frame SUVs still exist. Toyota's entry is their Tundra-based Sequoia 8-seat behemoth that offers nearly 10 inches more total legroom than a Chevy Tahoe or GMC Yukon. On the down side it's been quite some time since Toyota made any substantive changes to their large people mover and as a result it's feeling a little behind the times. As 2018 draws to a close we don't see any major changes on the horizon for the 2019 Sequoia.
Join Today: bit.ly/2WdCEwW
The Best Cars, Trucks & SUVs: • The A List - The Best ...
Follow AoA on Facebook: theautobu...
Follow The Mountain Garden: goo.gl/icFWcd
Reasons for buying this: no start stop engine bs, no cylinder deactivation bs, no turbo v6 bs. I’ll take the hit with mpg for a smooth powerful engine that’ll last for years and years to come.
Man you nailed that one on the head! I’m with you all the way.
If you don't have a big family, nor you need to tow, there is no justification to buy an inefficient vehicle like this, it might be reliable, but the money wasted in fuel is a lot, and the transmission is going to give issues in the long run with such complexity, and will be quite expensive to replace.
Same I have the nightshade 2021 limited. It's perfect and can offroad
Also I have 2 luxury cars using premium and I have been used to the gas prices. I rather pay more on gas than break down in the mountains or long trips. Not to mention paying a shop to fix broken electrical and mechanical issues. With Toyota I am fine with their factory warranty. With the big 3 I would have to buy the extended warranty lol.
I am a victim of the cylinder deactivation. I hate it and I will never own another Chevy. UGH
Recently rented a 2019 Sequoia for a long weekend, driving a combination of highway and in the city. I ABSOLUTELY LOVED this truck. LOVED IT! It was not as bad on gas as I expected.
Unlike most auto consumers, I am ALL about engine and transmission durability, reliability, and ride comfort. I do NOT care about cup holders, heated steering wheels, power tailgates, infotainment systems, and other gizmos and doo dads. Truck starts up every morning for years and years and years? Handles snow and mud effortlessly? Air conditioner blows ice cold? I'm good to go!
I found nothing to complain about. If I could find a gently used, low mileage one from 2017 or 2018, I would be ALL over it.
Old-school is THE best school.
Amen!
It is a Dinosaur! But this one won't be killed by any asteroids!
You are right. An asteroid will kill off the human race, but the Sequoia will exist hundreds more years if in a proper storage facility.
It actually does come with a power tail gate on the higher trim levels
Add this vehicle to the long list of Toyota's that simply work - short on luxury, short on fuel economy, short on options, but long on life. Neither the Sequoia, 4Runner, or Tacoma are what I would call next generation.
The next generation of body-on-frame Toyota trucks and SUVs is under development right now. Give TMC another year or two and we will see whether they beat today's offerings.
RELIABILITY and RESALE = TOYOTA
Rather pay for more gas in a year then having the gm twins because they gonna give me a lot of problems
Exactly.
That mindset stale now... Driving outdated technology just so u can keep that I'm reliable tag is old...
keri ellerbe don’t change it if it’s not broken unlike Nissan with their cvt change it if it’s not working
keri ellerbe how is that old? I could keep this car for 20 years and have almost no maintenance l, whereas everyone else will have at least 2 cars within that timeframe. Those cars will have more maintenance and have about the same resale value as the Toyota after 20 years. In the end I’ve saved more money and have had less headaches.
Mike Stanley the gm twins would b at the shop most of those times to keep it running nd most likely in the junk yard only one I could see lasting 20 years is the expedition but it still gonnna need way more taking care of but the Toyota gonna have original powertrain unlike the others
He meant to type 2008 in the title.
It's a V8 Sienna.
Reasons for buying this:
Toyota reliability
120 cubic feet cargo capcity
Being a fan of dinosaurs
Mgoblagulkablong I genuinely have no clue how Toyota managed to have that much cargo space. That’s the same as a suburban which is like 20 inches longer
Jay Mac - Our 2014 Sequoia is set up much like a van or the Nissan NV 3500 with a relatively short hood and large body in the same overall length as something more like a Ford Expedition. The second and third rows have enormous leg room. When my Sequoia needs engine work near the firewall, I'm planning to take it to a shop as it is too cramped for me. Not happy with lack of a transmission dipstick, but that's common on modern vehicles. Don't buy a Sequoia as just a kid hauler - there's plenty of solid choices that don't have the strength or towing capability of these body-on-frame "dinosaurs."
ROSS GHELLER WOULD LOVE THIS
An like the other brand toyota is keeping it real.they r going for over teck looks.dat dnt last holds no value.ntg rong with toyota big suv.best dam brand in the world.why ppl dnt wnt to sell there toyota cars bus pickups suv.they last .cost less 10 years r more u get d best resale value on earth.can honda r nissan they dat? R others auto makers.no!!!! They r all junks.toyota king forever
It is also well know, that it is happy being fed dinosaurs.
Is this a re-upload from 2004?
Denis Ilyayev 2001BC
Is...Is that an ash tray in the door handle??
LOOKS LIKE
Non2008
A pure V8 Powertrain without turbos, superchargers and pesky fuel management goblins. That’s music to my ears. I love it. Long live the Sequoia.
I just bought a 2018 Toyota Sequoia Platinum for $56300 before tax and tags and fees. Sticker was just shy of $69k. Toyota was offering $3,500 cash back on 2018 models. The 2018 and 2019 Sequoia are exactly the same in every way for every trim model. Gas tank is 26.5 gallons and I average 13.1 mpg in mixed use (mostly city). This is the second Sequoia I have owned (last one was a 2011 Limited Version) and I love them. I have a family of 5 and a dog so the interior room can't be beat. Highly recommended if you can get a deal.
Are these prices in US or CAN dollars; I wish I could get that price here in Canada.
@@Richard-cb6xw Thinking used Lexus 470 via back door and ambiance
Emergency worker for the state
Have a 1998 4-Runner 125000 miles
13k in fees and taxes sound a bit too much
@@dfhhtyu3434 Its wasn't $13k in fees, it was $13k off sticker. Only fees was sales tax and tags.
holnugget not a bad deal got mine xse Camry 19 under 29k out the door
Anytime you're discussing a vehicle that's getting 12/13 MPG - it would be meaningful to mention fuel tank volume and range characteristics.
Agreed, tank size while towing is by far the biggest problem with the Tundra.
Same volume and range as the Tundra.
I agree that would be useful. Anyways, for the curious, mpg on Toyota's website lists 13/17/15 (2wd SR5 trim) or 13/17/14 (4WD Platinum trim) with a 26.4 gallon tank, which gives it a range of 396mi at 15mpg or 370mi at 14mpg. I don't see a larger tank mentioned in the options or packages available. www.toyota.com/sequoia/features/mpg/7917/7933/7921/7922
As if fuel economy matters to potential buyers for this thing? Hah!
@@ElroyMcDuff No, but range does.
Problem is all of the tricks GMC and Ford have tried have issues. Eco boost and cylinder shut off technology.
Very true
My dads Honda Pilot has a cylinder shutoff issue and it would have been $6000 to repair, but it was covered by honda
I have a GMC Yukon Denali and a Sequoia.
Sequoia hands down.
The GMC is nothing but an unreliable money pit after 90K miles.
The Sequoia never gave us any problems at 256K miles and still running strong.
I’ll take the Sequoia any day.
Cylinder deactivation is giving GM problems in many of their vehicles. I don't think I'd want it and I hate stop start functions. Yes the mileage will be a a couple less than the others but the engine will still be running 20 years from now.
I would say 40 years easy
I have a 2010 Platinum and I love it. Other than fuel economy it does everything well. Has 120k miles but drives like new and everything works perfectly. Depreciation is the highest cost of ownership and Sequoia has a great resale value so when you look 5 yrs into the future you will find that a Sequoia doesn't cost as much to own as it's competition. I personally wouldn't buy a new one but used they are an awesome value.
Yes.
I have a 2010 Limited and I feel the same way!
@@gatto190 A basic SR5 4X4 and a gasoline credit card in someone's else's name would be good enough for me. Seriously, anyone shopping in the 3 ton category should not complain too much about mpg.
Right Lane Hog agreed. I only do 10,000 miles per year. So it's like a $150 difference per year. I have 125,000 miles on mine and it is so rock solid. I know that many 9 year old American trucks with the same mileage, have already had major repairs at this point.
@@gatto190 Some day TMC will figure out a way to up the mpg. In the meantime, the savings due to superior QDR compared to all the competition EASILY pay for the extra fuel costs.
Yes it’s dated but at least not have tons of touch buttons and tons of technologies that easily breaks down within few months, this design will age well , very well
True.
For ever and EVER running PERFECT
Toyota trucks always do!
I bought a Sequoia new in 2002. It was my favorite vehicle I have ever owned. I traded it last year at 15 years old. The people that bought it love it as much as I did. I would buy it all over again.
I have an 03 Sequoia best vehicle I've ever had. It also has 293000 miles and going strong
@Steve Consley Obviously you didn't get this newest Sequins? I'm guessing though you got another Toyota?
@ Josh McCormick That's not too surprising. It's a Toyota after all and that's no bad thing☺ There's still some old people around that think Japanese stuff is junk 🤣
Those people are crazy
So would i
A Sequoia is truly a 3/4 ton SUV that will run 400,000 miles with proper maintenance. Alex failed to mention that the underlying frame, 5.7 liter engine and transmission were originally rated to tow 10,000 pounds which is 3/4 ton truck territory. Our 2014 Sequoia towed a 7500 pound trailer 3500 miles through most of the East Coast last summer and barely broke a sweat. Our previous Suburban 2500 with the 6.2 liter engine was about equal in towing a similar trailer. It was rated at 9400 pounds towing capacity. Toyota changed its method of towing calculation around 2011, but the vehicle did not change.
This is good to know. Thanks
Sequoia, a solid package. Looking to buy my second one, my first one has 503,000 km's and still running like new. I think I just broke in the engine. My wife will get the new one ;)
Mine it's been running for 15 yrs straight
I’m waiting for my 2018 to be delivered. I have been looking for a sequoia since June, encause of how crazy this market is and I just found one that has everything I need. And I personally think that it’s a beautiful looking beast!!
I love the reliability. GM can't compete in that segment or any segment when it comes to reliability. Neither can Ford.
Sad but very true.
This is still a very good choice for people who are buying large SUV for at least next 10-15 years. It might be old in its design, but it is almost bulletproof when it comes to reliability.
Indeed!.
Except for the wildly increased fuel consumption. Per year we are talking about 500 more a year over a tahoe and 700 a year over an expedition (using a 2.64 usd per gallon price). Over 8 years, that's 4000 dollars saved with a tahoe and 5600 dollars with an expedition. I would honestly rather put that money into repairs and have a more updated vehicle than in fuel savings. Also I am pretty sure it has the shortest range in class.
@@james2042 what?? You would rather have your vehicle in the shop getting repairs done than actually driving it? That's some backwards ass thinking
@@tommieboi707 firstly the sequoia has been redesigned since, as this comment is now 3 years old. Now the sequoia is right on par with power train and reliability. Second if it landed itself in the shop once every 100k miles and for that 100k miles I have a much more comfortable vehicle? Yes
@@james2042 oh so now you can predict when a car will be in the shop? You're a genius! You should play the lotto! Buy an unreliable car and as long as it's only in the shop once every 100k miles I'm good to go! Rocket scientist!!
Gas might be more expensive then the competition, but when it comes time to sell the Toyota will hold much more of its original value, and will sell quicker than the competition.
This is definitely not a cross over haha. This is what you call an SUV not these cars pretending to be SUV’s.
I can understand Toyota being cheap and not giving it a major update. But why not at least put in the dash from the latest Tundra? By keeping the old Tundra's dash Toyota has to manufacture two complete dashes.
We are always told it is cheaper to make one thing in larger numbers.
Sacapuntas the new Tundra is a redesigned body, this Sequoia is based off of the first gen Tundra. The dashes wouldn’t interchange I’d imagine.
Only the outside body panels were redesigned. I think the door panels remained the same. The main structure is the same and hard points are the same.
Also this Sequoia is based of the 2nd gen Tundra (which was the first full size, the 1st gen was 2000-2006)
Because they’re not making the old interior components. They’re using what’s already been made, that’s sitting in their parts bins.
Because they don't sell enough of these. 12k annually. Is way beyond the Expedition or Tahoe. But the sells have been steady over the last 10 years, more or less 12 k units a year. So... why would they bother in renewing it??
I have a 2007 Toyota Sequoia limited top of the line with 119,000 miles and it still is like new
That sequoia has a better turning radius than the smaller SUVs & crossovers. Made right here in the USA. So darn reliable you’ll thank yourself over & over for buying something that doesn’t break down like the other models in it’s class. I do agree, it needs to get better fuel economy.
Excellent summary. I am not sure how high mpg is possible in the 3 ton class but I am confident Toyota is working on it in their subterranean labs hidden somewhere in the Japanese countryside. I hope they don't come up with a bunch of turbocharged engines for this type of vehicle.
Getting a Mazda Miata I mean pu.
The turning radius is great for making U-turns and the nice large mirrors fold in by pushing a button so they don't stick out when you park. I can see behind while pulling my 8' wide RV without using clamp on mirrors. It gets much better mileage on the interstate, which it is primarily designed for. I bought my 2018 Platinum Sequoia used one year. It's the same as if I bought it new. I had to replace the battery because it won't start if the voltage drops, so I carry one of those lithium jump start batteries in case it happens again. I'm well pleased with it and love taking it on long trips.
I have always been a Lexus Owner and then something happened to me. I sold the Lexus and brought a Tahoe. 7 months later i was realized that America really needs to stop making cars. hated the way it handles, almost everything inside is Plastic.
It’s actually cheap for its size. Like $20k less than the others.
The best deal per ton.
Agree it needs an update, particularly MPG!! HOWEVER, this is one of the most comfortable, practical and dependable cars we have ever had. In fact, if they screw up the 20XX redesign, I would buy the last of this model again!!! Looked at the new Expedition before buying this one.....thought it was a hunk of junk.
SM, A very sensible summation. If you really need the power and capacity then the Sequoia is the best choice. The SR5 is a relative bargain.
That interior is definitely dinosaur.
It definitely has a couple dinosaurs in it. Because it's made of so much plastic. This joke is only a 5/7 but the point is there is too much plastic for my taste.
They DO NOT KNOW ANY BETTER ABOUT QUALITY VEHICLES MUCH LESS ABUOT LEXUS I MEAN DESIGN QUALITIES FOR SURE U SHOULD LEARN THEM
Alex, I think you made a typo in the title. This is the **2008** Toyota Sequoia.
And you are fun at parties.
XD
I just bought a few months ago a new 2017 platinum edition 4wd with 2nd row captain chairs that the dealer couldn’t sell. I got over 12k off the MSRP. I wanted a full size to pull our small trailer and be comfortable for all our kids. Plus I wanted a Toyota. Definitely agree with most of the negatives except handling. The platinum does have a ride control switch for sway. Also, that dash with the gauges is redesigned from the 2017 and much better than the 2017 dash.
3 Tons of Toyota SUV fun and a lesson in tree species at the same time. The Sequoia SR5 4X4 comes in 35K cheaper than the LC . This is officially the poor man's LandCruiser. What would you do with the spare 35K?
Right Lane Hog buy a tacoma or 4runner
What would I do with the spare $35,000? Get a vehicle designed and made for this century.
Miata =D
EMcD, Fold down the two back rows and carry the Miata with you.
With the 35K , I would fly to Europe and buy a new Corolla wagon.
Just compensate your driving around the vehicle! Fuel it up! Enjoy the Quality, Reliability, and Dependability that the Toyota Sequoia will give you!!!!! There's no domestic going to touch this!!!!!
I agree with you in the comparison but the reliability of Toyota makes big difference and the amount of room you get in the sequoia is unmatched
I would still buy one.
Still rather have this than the Durangosaurus
Take that, Alex!
1. Still look better than many modern American SUVS inside and out. When Toyota made this one back in 2008, they were ahead by at least 10 years of everyone else. That's why they can chill now.
2. As far as MPG goes. Fords and GMs numbers are deceiving. Look on fuelly.com. While sequoias MPG on paper match what people actually report, GM and Ford SUVs drivers report averages even below city MPG.
3. I have owned 2004 Sequoia and 2012 Sequoia Platinum. Purchased 2018 Expidition last year. Will be selling it this year and jump back on Sequoia. New Expedition is junk car all around. You feel it inside and outside. Everything is made cheap and without much thought process. Sequoia is much much better in driving and maintaining, and resale values.
4. The tailgate is powered on platinum and limited. Plus you have to insert key to close the tailgate window for safety. You can open it with remote though.
5. Buy sequoia. Best SUV on the market
I agree 101%!!. On the hwy, I get 20mpg at 55 get 18 + @ 60mph, and 17.5 @ 75mph. MPG is the city is meaningless unless you drive all the time and all day in the city.
The fords and sadly chevy ( from 2008 to 2019) {Fords have always been the worst to feed and clothe after 5 years!! } ... are just not made to same quality as Toyota. I have owned them all. considering TCO, total cost of owner ship... Toyota Sequoia is really hard to beat.
There's a reason why Toyota has such an impressive profit margin compared to other automakers....
They save themselves billions in warranty costs with their commitment to QDR.
Yup that's a factor too. Their margin on vehicles over the model's life cycle is monstrous compared to other manufacturers. And they are able to charge a healthy price because customers are willing to pay since they know resale value will be strong - precisely because of limited defects and potential issues out of warranty. I'd much rather have a 5.7 v8 out of warranty than any Ecoboost motor for sure.
They are also the most vertically integrated car manufacturer so they exert far more quality control and simply share a lot less CA$H with suppliers.
toyota gets something to work right and does not mess with it. Ill pass on cylinder deactivation and turbos.
I bought a 2018, sizing up from my 2011 4runner. Love it.
Please get back to us in 2038 to let us know your long-term observations.
It might be "old fashioned" and drinks a lot of gas.. it won't leave you stranded. That little bit of MPGs will not add up the repair nills of the other models if your not putting 10's of thousands a year. Even than maybe. I would still take my Sequoia over the competition any day. Just not the 2023 models.. it's very tried and true even if it's slightly outdated and costly.
The problem with auto reviews is that you lose some portion of your audience when you hit some segment's deal-breaker. You lost me when you said that you, at 6' tall had only a half-inch of headroom.
Come back in 20 years and review it again. It will still be running.
True
Best beast ever. I love mine, and why mess with perfection
Thats right!
In deed
Here in 2023 about to buy a 2018 SR5 with 22K miles for $44K almost brand new! Going to put a big screen apple CarPlay fill with gas and enjoy…
A grand highlander would make more sense but I love the Sequioa’s (not the 2023s).
Can you tell me what screen you put in? I’m in the same situation and love everything but the screen!
@@joedugger21 pioneer dmh 3800 it’s been great have in my tundra and sequoia.
Ford and GM have figured out that the people who still buy these dinos are people for whom towing is important. And because of that they are including an option for a built-in towing brake controller. This is important because these built-in brake controllers work in conjunction with stability control. I consider this an important safety feature and this why I'm not looking at a Sequoia or Armada.
True
The sequoia as well as tundra they do have brake controller wiring ready, and do have Trailer Sway Control.
The only thing missing is the controller. if it is needed just buy one controller and plug N play.
@@WangYcca No, the Sequoia's stability control computer cannot activate the trailer brakes in an emergency maneuver. I think a Tundra has a built in brake controller but I was not talking about the Tundra.
Alex, are you serious concerning Chevy Tahoe breaking distance? 115 feet is 16 feet less than what you registered with the Sequoia. That's sports like car territory.
why do we need 100 gears ?
Just bought one, for reliability, comfort, usable 3rd row seat height, towing is ok but no electric brakes, no heated steering wheel, no remote start and small sunroof, no USB plugs at all seats. Resale value very high!
Reliability is the most important factor. SEQUOIA!
I'm a big guy and Sequoia is awesome .......They need to update the engine and make it more fuel efficient though. You don't need all 8 cylinders firing when driving 60 mph. They should replicate the Northstar system with deactivating 2 of the injectors.
I don't know. This is a huge vehicle. It tows almost 8000 lbs. With the right tow package like the tundra then it carry up to 10000 lbs. Just a thought. That's the v8 is needed.
I'm the third owner of an '02 Sequoia Limited 4x4 and I've had it for a little over a year. I bought it for $3,500 and it's approaching 300k miles. Yes, the mileage sucks and it's not a cone carver, but that's not what you buy these kinds of trucks for. It's taken me everywhere I want to go, carried everything I throw into it, and towed trailers several times all without any fuss. Build quality is amazing with barely a squeak, no tears in the leather, and no missing or broken trim pieces. After I installed a back-up camera/NAV/Bluetooth radio, I don't feel as if I'm missing much from a newer rig. The only thing I can think of that's truly bad about it is that the third row is a pain to remove.
long term ford turbos go bad gm fuel management is expensive to maintain so id rather pay for just gas (as expected in a larger vehicle) than maintenance on gadgets and do dads plus higher resale value at 150k to over 200k miles and it looks the same pretty much every year so you can keep them and they rarely go out of style.
Yeah, I agree... this vehicle is just dated. Period.
This is actually over engineered. The android carplay, etc are just new today.
Outdated. We bought it when it got redesigned way back in 2008. 3 years later we traded it in because it was already so archaic. Can't believe it still hasn't gotten a full workup and it's 2018.
Still newer than the Expedition Ford was selling up until last year. This is 10 years old, the Expedition was 14 years old in 2017
How was the resale value?
@@DoctorSkillz unfortunately I do not recall the resale value, though I'm sure it was good.
Sequoia is a substitute for a classic Land Cruiser, for 50 grand brand new. Of course it's got a decent resale value too.
COVID 19 haircut before they were fashionable, very heaven's gate, thanks Alex happy 4th.
You are a dodge fan boy and it shows. You omitted some important facts. Thinking people think this through in every way. They buy Toyota and drive them for a really long time. You will have to buy a ford... (freaking old rebuilt dodge) or a dodge 2 to 3 times for each Toyota. At that point in time the gas milage is meaningless! Besides I get easy 20mpg @ 55 , 18mpg at 65 and 17.4 at 75mph. I also gained 1.5 to 2.0 mpg using royal purple 0w- 20 HPS oil. ! The gas milage will go down if you ask all 380 horses to run. Toyota gas mileage is decent and liveable. The GM/ Ford efforts to get better milage result in much less reliability and driving issues!
Then there is safety. I know people that walked away from being hit while in there Tundra, or Sequoia. The solid build makes it a very safe vehicle.
Well said.
Time for a redesign Toyota....
Jordan Catcher it already redesign! Millions people complaining mpg is terrible!
I think you mean mid-cycle refresh (It's the same generation that's been around since 2008). 2018 marks the another big update. The redesign more than likely won't come until the 2020 model year.
Jordan Catcher maybe in another 10 years
Toyota priorities their hybrid system in the vehicles that sell well world wide. Saying that changing the engine for a newer version that already exists in other vehicles should be easy enough :)
@@valdius85 I hope they make the Sequoia in the hybrid version, more robust mechanically, less things to break, and much more efficient.
I really appreciate how you don’t seem to let your personal preferences affect your reviews - it’s very refreshing compared to some other reviewers. I get that the Sequoia design is super dated compared to its competitors, however the Toyota is prob going to outlast all the others. It’s tried, true, holds its value, will run forever...If it ain’t broke don’t fix it 🤷🏼♀️. Thanks for all your helpful reviews Alex 🙏🏼!!!
There is on aspect here that it is not being discussed though: The sale price that you see on the web page compared to the real sale price. If you check the offer at autotrader, you can find brand new Tahoes, Armadas or Expeditions for about 40k to 42k, while the Sequoias start at almost 50k, all of them entry-level (lower end of the range). Why would you then pay an outdated product almost 8 k more than a newer one ?
Most reliable vehicle I’ve ever owned. Wish it would get an 8spd transmission for better fuel economy though.
Land Cruiser/lx570 has it. Toyota can do it
I have 2001 with 123.000 miles on my toyota is not even broken in!😀 They are super reliable!better them the landcruiser for way less money
In this segment the SR5 is a steal.
You actually spend more driving american cars as they breakdown. These cars have 5.7v8 which is Toyotas most reliable engine and can easily reach half a million km. So better spend bit more on fuel than thousands In workshops.
I love the "old" of this rig, we just bought one because everything is tried and true (no surprises). I've had larger rigs with 8+ speed auto transmissions and I absolutely hate how all of them "hunt" for a gear on road trips, especially using cruise control. I also like going a bit backwards on the Tech stack. Less to go wrong, all the manufacturers are pushing the limit on technology and I'm tired of being a beta tester for them. One reason I've swarn off the big three as well. I like the feel of the TRD Sport, the handling is surprisingly tight and flat for something this big, it almost reminds me of a VW Touareg with sport suspension. Long story short, the TRD Sport may not be the status symbol everyone is going for and won't admit to, but it gets the job done, dependably and will do everything I need it to, and then some. Oh, and the price, compared to the GM and Ford offerings make me feel like i'm not being bent over a barrel. Want more power, get a magnuson supercharger and bolt it right on.
Havn't mention the sequoia is the only SUV offers switchable full time 4wd drive and 2wd system. it helps a lot In winter slushy condition, since the truck can be in 40/60 4wd all the time.
And I found when alex doing the test, the truck was on 4hi, that may explain a little bit why the gas mileage is to high. in average, it will be about 1-2 mpg difference 2wd vs 4wd.
GM twins offer a transfer case with the choice of 2hi, 4hi, 4lo and Auto 4WD. The Ford Expedition FX4 Transfer case offers Auto 4WD, 4lo, and 2hi modes.
those auto 4wd systems are not full time 4wd, they are intelligent 4wd, basically they are part time 4wd + clutch packs. the truck will run at 2wd, and will only engage 4wd when the trucks sense slips. it is the same as you manually switch between 2wd and 4wd, just a little faster. Doesn't matter how fast the switching is, when the trucks sense slips some time it is late already when you drive fast at icy roads. Since those system are basically part time 4wd, it cannot in 4hi at high speed, and make turns, so that when you drive at high speed with angled steering, the 4hi even cannot engage.
Ford auto 4hi, front wheels are engaged all the time with 1-2% power send to the front. That explains why the auto 4hi gas mileage is lower than 2wd. However, what bothers me is that at auto 4hi the clutch packs is wearing all the time, although they are quite heavy duty. it is like you are driving a manual stick car with half clutch pressed all the time.
For some other brands, like infiniti QX80 armada, they seem like they are not even have clutch packs, when they are engaging 4hi, it will take even longer time.
Full time(permanent) 4WD systems (such as lc, lx, Sequoia, 4runner limited, q7, GLE, GLS ) won't help more than part time or intelligent systems when they are offroading, but they do increase the highway stability better than others.
I agree with you. I see what you are saying now. I think it is funny that Ford's FX4 "off-Road" package, while having a low range, does not actively lock into 4-wheel drive hi-range. Like you said above, GM's Auto 4wd mode engages the front only when rear slippage is detected. While their system does actively lock 4-wheel drive when in 4hi or 4lo, it does lack the option to have an open transfer case in 4WD like Jeep's original Selec-Trac, or the Sequoia.
I suppose the manufacturers compromised capability and safety for MPG with the "Auto" systems. My old XJ with the Selec-Trac in Full-Time 4WD was very stable and safe in rain and slushy snow.
And DINOSAURS ruled the earth for MILLIONS of years.
Alex. You know that gm quality isn’t great and they generally have issues after a while
Ford using turbos is bad trouble for reliability especially for a gigantic suv.
Repairs on turbos or cylinder deactivation or start stops are pricey.
You should explain how fuel economy compensates for reliability. If you have an expensive repair on an suv that’s more efficient won’t that be the same as a thirsty but reliable motor but paying more for gas often?
Toyota sequoia is the car for the future.
I am still enjoying mine after 14-yrs, and my brother bought it for me via insurance when it was just three years old, in the US. If I have money next time, I will still buy the 2015 model, trust me.
Toyota sequoia platinum all the way, cheers.
Speaking of Deltas, have you seen how much it costs to fix a GM with the failed AFM? It shrinks that delta quickly. Ask Expedition owners that have multiple cam phaser repairs how that Delta looks.
Sometimes not having all the tech as other competitors is great for repair bills. Less things to fix. Take GM for instances, the AFM system is junk and it only saves you 3mpg really. Its notorious to ruin the engine ans there is a 5k fix. Im saying this cause I own a 2008 Tahoe. I wished it didnt have the bells and whistles that I now have to repair. The navigation is shot. Back up camera is black and fuzzy when it appears on screen. It was a 70k ride. Engine had to be replaced before he got 90k miles
Inefficent, yes. Better build quality and reliability than any GM, Ford, or Dodge product . . . seven days a week and twice on sundays. And here is the kicker . . . RESALE! The Sequioa is a no brainer . . .
I haven't heard a more squeeky interior in years.
ak, I think those were Alex's joints creaking.
@@rightlanehog3151 lmfao
Maybe there's something more behind its name than we thought...
Will three car seats fit on the third row bench? I really don’t want to have to buy a same year suburban but with three young kids I’m afraid I might not have a choice.
Is this guy paid by Ford or what? My 2021 Sequoia limited has my relatives wondering why their Expeditions, Suburbans and Yukons keep having to go back to the dealer to fix things on them. My Sequoia goes in for scheduled maintenance. 😅🤣😂
I'm shopping now (2023) for a V8 body on frame SUV. Choice right now is between Sequoia and Armada. Why did you omit the Armada from the comparison?
Durango had many years on it now as does its reliability the cost of ownership. It rates low in many areas as its a stellantis product. Need i say more?
I drive a 2011 Tahoe and it's gets 12 to to the gallon. I don't expect better gas mileage on anything I'd buy.
It is inaccurate to say that this 5.7L V8 is “not as modern” this engine is 32V, Dual Overhead Cam, Variable Valve Timing, Direct Injected and the power & torque ratings are great. Not having an 8-spd. Auto Transmission does mean a mile or two per gallon loss in economy... but the engine is still very modern regardless of that transmission factor. A side note to the 6spd. Tranny in the Sequoia is that it is highly intuitive and silky smooth in operation.
The Toyota 5.7 has port fuel Injection, not direct injection and I'm glad it doesn't have direct injection.
@@Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix Yes.
rochab77 Do you have some supporting citations for that? Everything that I’ve read & watched says it has direct injection, I’m with you on the port injection or D-4S Dual injection.
love Toyota to death but the 4 Runner and this Sequoia need some serious love the SUV market is booming I don't know what Toyota is waiting for great Job Alex
I , .T ! . G ! Here are some capitals and punctuation for the above. Sprinkle them in where ever you see fit.
@@Jeep2Honda ok u must be a teacher to care about punctuation & capital letters in a TH-cam video or u have no life like who does that but either way I feel sorry for u lol
I'm not a teacher, just an old fart suffering with touch of the OCD. Thanks for feeling sorry for me, I need it! Before you ask, I don't sit on my porch waving my fist, shouting at the neighborhood kids "get off my lawn"... yet. LOL.
good to see you still got some life in you lol just don't become the porch guy the world doesn't need anymore
@@Jeep2Honda shit you need to try out Reddit it's full of people correcting other people it's great.
Jeep has been “refreshing” their stuff for 50 years and nobody complains because its considered cool retro.
Large SUV does sell well in U.S. lol....that is a joke, right? U.S. is the only biggest market of big SUV. Other markets are very dismal compare to U.S.
You guys should really stop with Armada is Patrol in other markets, it is closer to QX80 than Patrol. New Armada is really sad and just fatter QX80. It lacks full 4wd system, lockers, suspension that Patrol has and uses the same suspension that is inside qx80 with it's limited travel and articulation. The only common thing is that they share same platform. I really don't get why Nissan or Mitsubishi won't just sell Patrol and Pajero in North America or why Toyota won't add diesel engine to Land Cruiser
Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, that infotainment/center stack, hideous!! Honestly, Toyota should go with a whole new generation or kill this off and let the Land Cruiser take its place. Maybe swap some things out to meet the Sequoia's current price point.
These large SUVs would sell a lot more if they didn't ask 70k+ for them
They don’t make them like this anymore. Really would like to get one of these
Another dinosaur you could revue is the Dodge Grand Caravan. It outsells Pacifica and all the Fiat/Alfa combined. See the FCA sales charts. This current generation has been slogging along since 2011 and for 2019 it’s the same with less content available than previous years. This may be a tough call in the Car Review Community. Be the first. OK, Maybe the last.
You either believe in Toyota quality or not. The features are just money pits overtime without quality....unless you just lease it for a few
Hey Alex you managed the audio problem nicely, well done!
I like your shirt that grey looks nice on you. I like the sequoia it’s big I alike that it just needs more!
Jurassic Park is one of my childhood favorites..
Where is the 6 disc CD changer?
Reliability.
I love the Toyota Sequoia! It just last!
When Dinosaurs Roamed the Earth 🤔🤔 Shouldn’t that be for the “Land Cruiser” LOL
Toyota Needs to UPDATE THIS VEHICLE.
Adrian Cooper that’s an understatement. It needs a ground up, back to the drawing board, save nothing redesign
@@Jaymac720
I agree, there is so many ways Toyota can go with this. (Personally, I'd would work with a single stroke flat 6 cylinder turbocharged /intercooled clean diesel engine with a high compression ratio and an optional hybrid power train!
If you judge from what they did with the redesigned of the Toyota Supra you might say they are losing their design and engineering prowess!
Adrian Cooper i agree. I’d like to see a diesel for good gas mileage and towing as well as a hybrid but I would like to see them keep the traditional V8. Also I just want to see the same type of transformation that Ford had between the last and current gen expeditions. It’s like night and day
Adrian Cooper I’ve seen videos about opposed piston engines. A few automakers are already considering them. I didn’t realize Ford had already put one in a truck
@@Jaymac720
The Company that reworked that WW2 opposed piston engine put it in a Ford. I'm sure they had to get The FMC's permission.