Military Effects Studies on Operation Castle (1954)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 129

  • @HockeyVictory66
    @HockeyVictory66 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    They are implying that the residents were only mildly injured with skin burns. These people were poisoned fir life and cancer ran rampant through those communities. It’s sickening.

    • @DankNoodles420
      @DankNoodles420 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I was just thinking that, they sure make it sounds like nothing major and some minor symptoms is all that happened... no they got extremely sick and died, the ones who lived.. wished they were dead.

    • @fallinginthed33p
      @fallinginthed33p ปีที่แล้ว +1

      14:00 shows exposure on some islands was very high, above the lethal dose. I'm surprised the narrator only mentioned skin lesions and bloodwork abnormalities in affected islanders.

    • @Dudeguymansir
      @Dudeguymansir 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@fallinginthed33pwhen you’re developing super weapons, collateral damage + lost and ruined lives are an inevitability…

    • @Stevros999
      @Stevros999 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@Dudeguymansir * evitable

    • @kamakaziozzie3038
      @kamakaziozzie3038 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But…the patriotic music!
      Our military only wants what’s best for everyone 😄

  • @kitkat9648
    @kitkat9648 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    The tragedy of this video is all these people had radiation poisoning. It was being downplayed for the US audience.
    Another tragedy for the people of the Marshall Islands is the radiation exposure phenomenon " Jellyfish Babies " . A tragedy known to have e happened to this generation of Marshallese people.
    Babies born with no bone. Only a cartilage type material. So much death, so such a sweet people.

    • @KlausBahnhof
      @KlausBahnhof ปีที่แล้ว

      Human experimentation. Not much different from what the Nazis and the Japanese did during WWII. The US effectively waged nuclear war on these people.

    • @kingodysseas
      @kingodysseas ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Agreed. Such a callous disregard for the civilian population

    • @Dudeguymansir
      @Dudeguymansir 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@kingodysseasone state’s civilian population is another state’s target population…
      (Sometimes it’s the same state)

  • @tk423b
    @tk423b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    After a lengthy background check, they seemed to have found just one narrator for all these.

    • @beeble2003
      @beeble2003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Which would be fine, except that his pron'nciation of "killert'n", "meggert'n" and "neutr'n" are something of a distract'n.

    • @jamesanderton344
      @jamesanderton344 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ray Walston, I believe.

    • @thebanfflocal2366
      @thebanfflocal2366 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Reid Hadley does many of them

    • @Okie-00-Spool
      @Okie-00-Spool 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thebanfflocal2366 Correct, and while this sounds like him, I'm unable to verify that it is him. He is prominently featured in Operation Ivy. Hadley died at age 63.

    • @swainscheps
      @swainscheps 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jamesanderton344 aloha!

  • @scottryals3191
    @scottryals3191 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The ending seconds are perfect. "The End"

  • @matthewwagner47
    @matthewwagner47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Wonder what has been cleansed from the video?

    • @insideoutsideupsidedown2218
      @insideoutsideupsidedown2218 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The immediate area effects of bunkers built to see how they would survive a blast.

    • @matthewwagner47
      @matthewwagner47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@insideoutsideupsidedown2218 have seen videos using animals at differnt ranges from the target area and the effects.
      Obviously these are just animals.....

    • @annychest718
      @annychest718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Skin peeling off..eyes popping out..clothes blown off..poop 💩

    • @connerstines1578
      @connerstines1578 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Any sort of deep technical detail. That all gets cut. Just like there's plenty of pictures of the bombs themselves, but few to none of the actual fully assembled internal components, the pictures just show the bomb casing.

    • @maxasaurus3008
      @maxasaurus3008 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Photos of radiation effects.

  • @Arch3an
    @Arch3an 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Sometimes I wonder what would've happened if their mistake with Bravo was a lot more severe. Like if they made it 10x stronger by mistake.

  • @yakacm
    @yakacm ปีที่แล้ว +7

    When I 1st got interested in nuclear testing and the bomb, in the early 2000's you could order the tesat films from the DOE om VHS, who knows maybe you still can, well maybe not on VHS. Prior to 911 they were even more open, with a lot more documents etc available online. It was a pretty big deal when I got my hands on some test footage on DVD around 2003/2004. It's just a shame that they have deteriorated so badly. All of the films footage from the 50's/60's and 70's seems to be in this same rough looking washed out shape, which is just sad,

  • @ScotMorrisonKA3DRR
    @ScotMorrisonKA3DRR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    An amazing and shocking laboratory presentation in condensed form of Operation Castle - Shot Bravo. The magnitude of destruction cannot be lost as measurements of total destruction are made in ten's of ten's miles, and a magnification 1,000 times greater than that of Nagasaki and Hiroshima detonations. The fear must have shivered and shaken personnel as the fireball brushed against the firmament above. The intensity of Shot Bravo of how many sun's suddenly born in an instant between microseconds baffles one's imagination. Another excellent 'Vault' presentation that's well timed at this moment in history.

    • @annychest718
      @annychest718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They don't tell you how long they lived do they..surely that would spoil the fun..people suffered terribly and animals C.U.N.T.S ⁉️

    • @mortiel84
      @mortiel84 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤷🏻‍♀️must be gringo

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "...the firmament above..." I see you really have a handle on nuclear effects...btw...why is the firmament one-way and lets in meteorites and meteors...?

    • @kamakaziozzie3038
      @kamakaziozzie3038 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@buckhorncortezI’ve heard the firmament people don’t believe in meteorites.
      The explanation is NASA is faking data and we living in simulation- or god is throwing magic rocks from inside the bubble canopy

  • @jimsworthow531
    @jimsworthow531 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Those things look like the destroying angel mushrooms that I find from time to time when out forraging.

  • @nicholasmaude6906
    @nicholasmaude6906 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'd love to see the films done for each of individual test-devices especially the one for the Castle Bravo shot preferably unredacted.

    • @robertrusnak620
      @robertrusnak620 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      There was a time when Las Vegas was young that one of the tourist attractions was to go and watch the mushroom clouds of nuke testing from 70 or so miles away , NO KIDDING 😳.

    • @robertrusnak620
      @robertrusnak620 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      CRAZY STUFF🤣

    • @nicholasmaude6906
      @nicholasmaude6906 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@robertrusnak620 Yup! Atomic tourism was a big thing during the 1950s and early 1960s.

  • @nerdlydood
    @nerdlydood 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    12:55 wonder if we'll ever hear how the air force sea turtle project turned out

    • @gavinperch9413
      @gavinperch9413 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Considering that we haven't heard any follow up, I suspect that it was so effective and stealthy that its been deployed secretly. The b21 raider has an interesting resemblance to a sea turtle dont you think?

  • @GoSlash27
    @GoSlash27 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    8:26 "Only twelve of the 26 stations survived". No surprise there :D

  • @Mildain2000
    @Mildain2000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The only thing worse than the effects of nuclear radiation is the annoying orchestral music every old US military video opens with

  • @chuckkincaid986
    @chuckkincaid986 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Although devastating, these explosions are truly magnificent to see

    • @ritchieblackmore2711
      @ritchieblackmore2711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's something I'd love to see but unfortunately not...

    • @AJxxxxxxxx
      @AJxxxxxxxx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Just hope you never have to see one in real life

    • @ritchieblackmore2711
      @ritchieblackmore2711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AJxxxxxxxx that s true my friend you know it's like one of those things you'd wanna do before you meet your maker kinda thing but big thanks my friend from Scotland to you..

    • @annychest718
      @annychest718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🤮😫😲😭😝😣☹️😮😥😞😖😩😫😵😱🤢🥵🥶🤒😤😠😡🤬😈👿🤤😪🌚💩🤑👽👻☠️👹👺❣️💘💥🔥✨💫🕳️🦴🩸💀👅👀👁️👎🤘👤🌀🔥🌠🦌🐍🌍🐝💣🛑⚔️♂️❌♨️✴️☢️☣️⚠️🔆❎⬇️6️⃣6️⃣6️⃣🚼⚛️✡️☦️♾️✖️♠️🏴🏴‍☠️🐲🇺🇸

    • @annychest718
      @annychest718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ritchieblackmore2711
      Your maker 👿 would be proud of you

  • @ritchieblackmore2711
    @ritchieblackmore2711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing video thanks

  • @davidfisher12865
    @davidfisher12865 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Notice, we're talking about megaton termos. When they show the map of Washington they talk about kilotons.

  • @kamakaziozzie3038
    @kamakaziozzie3038 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This entire series of tests were so wrong:(.
    By this time in the mid-1950s the effects of nuclear detonation were known well enough. this should’ve never been allowed to happen

  • @emelle9705
    @emelle9705 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This ought to be required viewing for every Congress member even thinking about poking at Russia and/or China.

    • @charliesonthespot
      @charliesonthespot 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      You don't think they would be given the full, unredacted and still classified modern academic data from the entirety of US nuclear testing?

    • @emelle9705
      @emelle9705 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ I’m 100% sure it’s available to their offices, but, I’m also sure they are not well read on info to which their constituents & lobbying firms have no stake.

  • @MrWolfTickets
    @MrWolfTickets 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Hey if you like this stuff, read 'the effect of a nuclear attack on the rio grande valley'. It gives a millisecond by millisecond breakdown of a megaton explosion.

    • @stargazer4683
      @stargazer4683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But books are flammable does it come in stone tablet form ?

    • @annychest718
      @annychest718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@stargazer4683
      Ha ha

    • @annychest718
      @annychest718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No we don't like it..I'm researching..
      thanks for the info

  • @NoName-dn8nv
    @NoName-dn8nv 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Periscope is going to download your video and put their watermark on it

  • @Zoomer30_
    @Zoomer30_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Only a few natives had radiation sickness. Yay. Puking is FUN!

    • @puterman7642
      @puterman7642 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      We're gonna just leave out that Japanese fishing vessel we had to pay reparations for, oops.

    • @annychest718
      @annychest718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They lie

    • @annychest718
      @annychest718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@puterman7642
      Reparations not come yet fools

    • @allangibson2408
      @allangibson2408 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@annychest718 The Marshall Islands were given a $150 Million dollars as compensation in 1986. (Argument continues over the adequacy of this).
      The Lucky Dragon was subject to a $15,300,000 compensation payout in 1954 - most of which was pocketed by the Japanese government (each of the crew got $5,300).

    • @milosbulatovic81
      @milosbulatovic81 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@puterman7642 i think if Lucky Dragon Crew incident didn't became well known, the government would have probably just hush up everything and we wouldn't know anything about the fallout incident and we would still believe that "radiation from fallout would be negligible".

  • @Doug_Gissendanner
    @Doug_Gissendanner 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Question for the casual reader; how do you think it would to be to have a hydrogen bomb effects test (like these) conducted today? Would it be beneficial for today's generation to observe the power of these weapons?

  • @Jaggerbush
    @Jaggerbush 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Its a wonder we didn't irreversibly destroy everything during these few years.
    Edit: by "we' i mean mankind and by 'few years' i mean 1944-1960s.

  • @Milkmans_Son
    @Milkmans_Son ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so in the event of an event I should put a sprinkler on my roof?

  • @MarkHunrry
    @MarkHunrry 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    للأسف لايوجد مثل هذه العلوم في دول العالم الثالث مثل بلدي ليبيا 😢😮😮

  • @myriaddsystems
    @myriaddsystems ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How much animal life was destroyed by these tests?

  • @P-G-77
    @P-G-77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm sure... this reel have the potentiality to higher quality... but in the end all remain as is, the Gov. now have trillion of dollars to spent to many important things... imagine a great river that with the passage of the distance it disperses in many rivulets ... that are dispersed in the ... emptiness. But this is another part of the story, to requalify all this important material is not needed a great amount of money and the very important thing.... all this then remain perfectly saved.

    • @dr4d1s
      @dr4d1s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You might want to see a doctor. You may be having a stroke.

    • @annychest718
      @annychest718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      LOfL

  • @whirledpeas3477
    @whirledpeas3477 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I used to be scared but now that I know I have upto 3 seconds to dig a foxhole it's all good 👍

    • @allangibson2408
      @allangibson2408 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This was the origin of the school duck and cover drills - the seconds gave time to get below the window line to avoid the thermal radiation and under a desk to avoid the glass from the windows being smashed…
      The fall out was the bigger problem.

  • @joshjones3408
    @joshjones3408 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    6 truning an 4 burning....nice to see the old bird 👍👍

  • @TheMrcaLu
    @TheMrcaLu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    12:05 😱

    • @arnaudt3935
      @arnaudt3935 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They obviously minimize so much the fact that these people are tests subjects of the worst invention ever... without any consentement. So sad to see these innocent people sacrificed..

    • @TheMrcaLu
      @TheMrcaLu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arnaudt3935 in Italy our government did the same, we are a social experiment 🤬

  • @jimmy2drinks
    @jimmy2drinks 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Weather report was off; people on Rongelap are poisoned & lose their homes. Weather report a bit more off; everyone on Rongelap dies horrible death....... Well done lads??

  • @paladin0654
    @paladin0654 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The DOD thinking was that nuclear weapons were just another implement for a WWII style conflict.....big mistake.

  • @dominicseanmccann6300
    @dominicseanmccann6300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What was it with nuclear powers' & blowing up beaches? "Hey,Marty. Great spot for some fun..." " nuke the sandy bleeder!"

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ask the French...they did 191 nuclear tests in French Polynesia...

    • @dominicseanmccann6300
      @dominicseanmccann6300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@buckhorncortez I did, they said "non". Very secretive, the french military. I had a friend who was 2nd R.E.P foreign legion. He said he'd been down there as 'security' for the site. All the info he gave me. A crime against the peoples' of the pacific & humanity in general.

  • @piotr780
    @piotr780 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    13:00 tactical joke

  • @nathanielschwartz425
    @nathanielschwartz425 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    31:06-31:22 You think??!!! 😳😱

  • @mikes7639
    @mikes7639 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All are madmen putting all at risk to keep the first strike going. All we need is a deter option from subs and we only make the plains states a target

  • @robertrusnak620
    @robertrusnak620 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Here we are in 2024 . I’ll bet NO country with nuclear capability uses any bombs measured in kilotons . In short, I’d rather die in the initial blast than suffer for days or weeks afterward

    • @ZoeBrain
      @ZoeBrain 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You lose your bet. Anything over 250kt has its main radiological effect the contamination of the entire planet, rather than just the target area.
      5 MT for example causes an own goal as well as damage to the enemy.
      3 x 250kt not only does more blast damage than a 5 MT, but also concentrates fallout on the target area. Also cheaper to make.

  • @milmex317th
    @milmex317th 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Boom Boom 💥
    Out go the lights.

  • @Strong_UP_Calvins_zombie
    @Strong_UP_Calvins_zombie 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The arrogance and complete disregard for other life on Earth of those involved in the development of nuclear weapons,and their continued testing of said weapons is beyond measurable scales.

  • @annychest718
    @annychest718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What benefit is this to man beast or nature ❓

    • @allangibson2408
      @allangibson2408 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No one has used a nuclear weapon in combat.
      That is something that cannot be said of any other weapon manufactured.
      I can list hundreds of other weapons systems that have killed more people than all nuclear weapons combined (often by several orders of magnitude).

    • @CrazyLegs88
      @CrazyLegs88 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@allangibson2408 2 nuclear weapons were used against Japan by the US at the end of WW2. Hiroshima and Nagasaki.☢️

    • @allangibson2408
      @allangibson2408 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrazyLegs88 And since then?

    • @KlausBahnhof
      @KlausBahnhof ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@allangibson2408 Zero benefit. Strange how there's always someone in the comment section eager to justify these horrific nuclear tests, and downplay the destruction of a pristine ecosystem and forced relocation of poisoned native peoples.

    • @allangibson2408
      @allangibson2408 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KlausBahnhof The AK47 has killed more native people per year than every nuclear test ever.

  • @kingodysseas
    @kingodysseas ปีที่แล้ว +4

    They didn't care at all who they hurt doing this stuff. It's reprehensible. Makes you wonder what they're doing to innocent civilians right now. Can't imagine they changed their ways at all.

    • @GoSlash27
      @GoSlash27 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's not exactly fair. They put in place all the safeguards they could to protect human life, but Castle Bravo wound up being over twice as powerful as they had expected and the winds shifted immediately after the shot.

    • @chrisk1208
      @chrisk1208 ปีที่แล้ว

      Back than safery and gealrh standards were very different from nowadays. Doctors made commercial promoting s
      cigarettes for example. People were exposed to leaded gasoline, drank water from lead piping, doctors smoked while treating patients, asbestos was treated as just another construction material, etc etc. So you have to put these nuclear tests in the right context of the tome they were conducted and not compare them to our modern standards. Times have changed. Atmospheric nuclear testing stopped in the '60s, the US and Russia haven't conducted any nuclear tests since the '80s. Doctors don' make commercials for cigarettes anymore, construction workers don't use carcinogenic materials anymore. Everybody has changed their ways, but in 70 years people will be appaled about what we do today disregarding things like global warming, eating too much refined sugar, still using combustion engines etc.

    • @Dudeguymansir
      @Dudeguymansir 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I live near a radioactive waste cell in STL. Radioactive materials were found recently in an elementary school nearby. Hazelwood I think

    • @ateamfan42
      @ateamfan42 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The military industrial complex doesn't exist to protect the innocent civilians. Us regular people are expendable. The powerful and wealthy are the priority.

  • @TheMrcaLu
    @TheMrcaLu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    IT WAS A SHAME

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hmmm...I always thought "it" was a dark and stormy night...

  • @Eric-qo8vv
    @Eric-qo8vv 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awful just awful what they did to the Natives. This is all lies every bit of it

  • @jamesvaughn1354
    @jamesvaughn1354 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If remember right castle bravo was massive failer

    • @jwenting
      @jwenting 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yes and no. It was a failure in that it didn't reach the expected yield but instead reached a yield way beyond what had been expected.
      It was a success in that a lot of information was gained, leading to a massive increase of the understanding of nuclear science and engineering.
      And that was in the end what these early tests were all about, learning things and expanding the knowledge so that smaller, more efficient, more reliable, nuclear weapons could be designed and produced (and the knowledge gained also made its way into civilian applications eventually).

    • @psycotria
      @psycotria 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jwenting Yeah. The isotopic difference of Li isotopes, which wasn't considered, matters.

    • @jwenting
      @jwenting 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@psycotria yeah. Or rather one of the main isotopes which was assumed mostly inert turned out to be highly capable of fusion, increasing the fusion yield to about 10 times the expected.
      Made building lithium based fusion weapons a lot cheaper.

    • @KlausBahnhof
      @KlausBahnhof ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jwenting You forgot to mention the poisoned inhabitants who were forced to leave their home and suffer the effects of radiation for generations to come. I'd call that a monumental failure.