North American OV-10A "BRONCO" Rough Field Landing tests

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
  • North American OV-10 "BRONCO" tested for rough field landings.
    16mm film via OV-10 Bronco Association, Fort Worth Texas

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @obfuscated3090
    @obfuscated3090 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Note the narrow wingspan of the prototypes!

  • @joevanseeters2873
    @joevanseeters2873 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Probably no other combat plane in history could land and take off like the OV-10 and on fields and terrain that this airplane can land and take off on. It is one of its strongest points along with the giant glass cockpit which provides some of the best visibility of any combat aircraft ever made. In addition, it has the ability to carry a wide variety of munitions and armaments along with surveillance platforms. The aircraft is still used today by US Armed Forces as it was taken out of moth balls in 2015, resurrected, improved, and updated for special missions in the middle east.

  • @alexcwatt348
    @alexcwatt348 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ❤ I like looking motive body Bronco-OV.10 aircraft style, very handsome, the manouver is okay good looking lifestyle (?),❤

  • @freddyrosenberg9288
    @freddyrosenberg9288 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    X

  • @trexx32
    @trexx32 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No one could fly it like Bob Hoover

    • @dukesilver2019
      @dukesilver2019 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      nobody could fly anything like bob.

  • @mikesuch9021
    @mikesuch9021 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The bronco goes over bumps better than any Jeep I've ever seen.

    • @tfsplayer2275
      @tfsplayer2275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed😂

    • @islandfd3s
      @islandfd3s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Especially when you consider the speeds involved - 100MPH!
      I've never owned a jeep that could handle that at 30.

  • @cavok76
    @cavok76 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Trailing Link only on nose gear, interesting.

    • @2waterboy
      @2waterboy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Look again. Mains are trailing link too.

    • @cavok76
      @cavok76 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@2waterboy You are indeed correct. Didn't see at first.