What is the next step if we see that convergent validity is not valid? (less than 0.50) 1) Do we delete? 2) Or do we report it? 3) How do we explain this in the APA format?
Fornel and Larcker (1971) by comparing the square root of each AVE in the diagonal with the correlation coefficients (off-diagonal) for each construct in the relevant rows and columns.
![PASULOL รามเกียรติ์ ตอนที่ 4 นนทกพบรัก [Ramakien Ep.4: Nonthok in love]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tMUQgmZzf_A/mqdefault.jpg)
What is the next step if we see that convergent validity is not valid? (less than 0.50) 1) Do we delete? 2) Or do we report it? 3) How do we explain this in the APA format?
1) how do we report in the paper if we have convergent or discrimant issues? 2) what is the solution if we if we have convergent or discrimant issues?
Sir in F1 one value 0.772(vertical) is greater than 0.699 that means here also we are having issue of discrimination validity
Yes, you are right. Thanks for the identification.
As m also agree m also comment the same thing after view
how to root out the problem if the AVE is less than 0.50?
Sir, duringF3 correlation horizontal is less, in that case what to do? How to improve the correlation?
Very good sir
Thanks and welcome
if there is a discriminant validity issue in the measurement model, what's the solution?
There are several trial & error approaches. 1. remove the item having low loading (
SIR, WHAT IS THE NAME OF THIS METHOD OF CALCULATING DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY, hTMT, CROSS LOADING OR ANY OTHER METHOD
Fornel and Larcker (1971) by comparing the square
root of each AVE in the diagonal with the correlation coefficients (off-diagonal) for each construct in
the relevant rows and columns.
There is no link in the description.
th-cam.com/video/MHwFCX9iyFc/w-d-xo.html
how to add stat tool package in excel
File, Options, Add-ins, Analysis ToolPack, Go, OK
didnt understand