If you ❤ my videos do subscribe bit.ly/powerplaysubscription and do checkout the supporting options through Patreon: bit.ly/patreondanielking or through PayPal (links in the description)
Thanks so much for your excellent coverage, Daniel. I’d be very interested in your thoughts about the future of the world championship. Looking down the road a bit, perhaps 25 yrs or so, do you think the format will be pretty much like it is now, classical with similar time controls? Or will it evolve into some kind of hybrid with some rapid or even blitz games? What is your personal preference? And with the advent of the current engines, it appears there’s a much greater emphasis now on preparation and memorization. Do you think the top players might view this as a more tedious, less rewarding or inspiring aspect of the game in the future? Might it create more interest in alternatives like 960?
Yes the world championship should be decided with the first to 10 wins with atleast a difference of 3 If someone wins with a lesser difference they play on until there's a 3 win difference 🤝
@@SoulmateParis chess is just a hard game to win. I believe they are equal in their quality of play, but an indefinite match situation would lead to the match being won by qualities other than chess skills.
Geht mir auch so. Habe noch nie einen so krassen Unterschied gehört wie hier. Die symphatisch, humorvolle Art der Kommentierung von Daniel King auf der einen Seite und die leblose, Emphatie tötende Sprachwiedergabe auf der anderen Seite. Bin sofort zu den Einstellungen gesprungen und habe "Originalsprache" gewählt.
If you ❤ my videos do subscribe bit.ly/powerplaysubscription and do checkout the supporting options through Patreon: bit.ly/patreondanielking or through PayPal (links in the description)
Thanks so much for your excellent coverage, Daniel. I’d be very interested in your thoughts about the future of the world championship. Looking down the road a bit, perhaps 25 yrs or so, do you think the format will be pretty much like it is now, classical with similar time controls? Or will it evolve into some kind of hybrid with some rapid or even blitz games? What is your personal preference? And with the advent of the current engines, it appears there’s a much greater emphasis now on preparation and memorization. Do you think the top players might view this as a more tedious, less rewarding or inspiring aspect of the game in the future? Might it create more interest in alternatives like 960?
There are many GMs in chess and even a few champions, but there is only one KING 👑
Thank you Daniel for the excellent coverage as always 😊
Love this idea for a video mr. King, got a cup of coffee ready to go! All the experience you have, you alway curate the most interesting lines
Thanks Mr King❤❤❤
Thank you sir
I’m wondering whether a match should rather be decided by a larger point differential. Basically, this match was decided by one last move!
they gonna play forever if its like tennis
@ and so you are admitting that, to within one move, Gukesh and Ding are equals!
Yes the world championship should be decided with the first to 10 wins with atleast a difference of 3
If someone wins with a lesser difference they play on until there's a 3 win difference 🤝
@@SoulmateParis chess is just a hard game to win. I believe they are equal in their quality of play, but an indefinite match situation would lead to the match being won by qualities other than chess skills.
@ maybe keep the format and declare a tie. No world champion until someone wins the cycle with +2? just an idea.
Come back later for the exciting conclusion
Nein, Nein, Nein….was soll der Scheiss mit der KI Übersetzung - Daniel King spricht sehr gutes Deutsch - das hier ist eine Zumutung 🤮🤢
Geht mir auch so. Habe noch nie einen so krassen Unterschied gehört wie hier. Die symphatisch, humorvolle Art der Kommentierung von Daniel King auf der einen Seite und die leblose, Emphatie tötende Sprachwiedergabe auf der anderen Seite.
Bin sofort zu den Einstellungen gesprungen und habe "Originalsprache" gewählt.