Captured NATO EQUIPMENT In Moscow! AMERICAN VETERAN VISITS PATRIOT PARK!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 พ.ย. 2023
  • Enjoy the video

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @Wild-Siberia
    @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +420

    🙏🏻🇷🇺 Patriot Park
    READ VIDEO POINTS BELOW
    Higher quantity from the soviets doesn’t mean that they had lower quality. A lot of people are commenting because I said what I said that I believe that they had lower quality weapons.
    When I said “unfortunately the tiger didn’t help them” this is from their point of view what they thought not what I feel.
    Many people don’t understand this maybe their first language is not English. I’m clearly talking about the axis sentiment. Fortunately for us (the rest of the world) they didn’t work.
    LAND LEASE MENTIONED IN VIDEO.
    I’d also like to address the new subscribers and the old with a big thank you for sharing this video.

    • @thomasMarek1
      @thomasMarek1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      The lend lease that brought american tanks to URSS, like M3 Lee and Shermans, you as an american should know your own history.

    • @ranger275th9
      @ranger275th9 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      I was in the military for over 20 years, and I can tell you most Infantry Soldiers would trade an M4 or M16 for an AK any day of the week! As for Mr. know your history down here... It was USSR, not the URSS. Maybe clean up your own backyard before correcting others?

    • @user-us5lv9xl6j
      @user-us5lv9xl6j 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      В Москве сейчас проходит большая выставка в вднх!!! Думаю для вашего канала будет интересно!!!

    • @pickerooni6247
      @pickerooni6247 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      LOL

    • @The1cdccop
      @The1cdccop 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Soviet weapons were/are every bit as sophisticated as ours, sometimes better because a farmer could use it. The problem was that safety was an afterthought and most products were assembled at gunpoint, so if every fifth unit coming down the assembly line worked, it was good enough.

  • @user-Cepera.POCTOB
    @user-Cepera.POCTOB 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1911

    I saw one video where a veteran of the war, he was a tanker, he said that when they received equipment that came under Lend-Lease, they often found hidden gifts from the guys from the U.S. who made and sent this equipment, it was whiskey, cigars, chocolate and other nice little things, as well as letters of support!!!

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +200

      that is very cool. I love reading stories like this please do continue sharing any information you have you know that this channels common section is a forum

    • @xawecki8149
      @xawecki8149 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +131

      This reminds me of "American support" in current conflict, this time around against Russian nation. I wonder if Ukrainians also find whiskey, cigars and perhaps something else in equipment delivered from uncle Sam.

    • @user-uo9bh1xp6y
      @user-uo9bh1xp6y 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@xawecki8149Вряд ли, поскольку все поставки амуниции проходят через третьи руки. Те ещё ручонки, вороватые и хитрые 😉

    • @sdamer4609
      @sdamer4609 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      @@xawecki8149 I bet they do, that is a really warming gesture

    • @mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520
      @mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +197

      People are quick to forget that Russia and America were friends and allies during both world wars
      imperial Russia was also one of the First Nations to recognise America as a country during war of independence

  • @ImixSpb
    @ImixSpb 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +964

    The MIG fighter brand is an abbreviation of M(ikoyan) and G(urevich's) names. They were both outstanding Soviet aircraft designers.
    Good video, Dan! 👍

    • @stormtrooper9404
      @stormtrooper9404 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Let’s be honest… they were not!!
      The drift is that Mikoyan’s brother was a high ranking politician in a polit-burro that always get them a projects even if they didn’t deserved it or were bad at it!
      Really good designers and bureaus was suffering because of that…
      And in the end many soviet pilots lost their life’s in incompetent aircrafts!

    • @ImixSpb
      @ImixSpb 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +103

      @@stormtrooper9404
      Share your expert opinion with the pilots whose planes were shot down by MiG fighters. Good luck!

    • @jaypeedesuyo662
      @jaypeedesuyo662 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

      ​@@stormtrooper9404 Not reallly, Migs have proven their worth in combat. Add to the fact that most Mig aircraft used in combat in the past 70 years were not flown by the Russians/Soviets.

    • @VIPER276
      @VIPER276 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

      ​@@stormtrooper9404Migs are literally the planes that the west feared the most what are you talking about?

    • @shesathome
      @shesathome 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      @@stormtrooper9404 Artem Mikoyan's son was a pilot and fought in WWII and was shot down in 1942. Because his uncle was a Politbureau member? M.Gurevich was a Jew, studied aviation engineering in France along with M.Dassault, continued education in the USA. Whose son or brother was he? You produce total crap! And MiG Alley was a nightmare and a graveyard for Americans in Korean War!

  • @SerbanOprescu
    @SerbanOprescu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

    The fact is that while the Soviet Army stood out through quantity, its weapons - from T-34 tanks, through Yak-3 and La-5 fighters to field artillery - was of fairly good quality. Even if Germans had great tanks and good fighter planes, the difference was not overwhelming.

    • @zenmollusc6128
      @zenmollusc6128 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      TBF I don't think German tanks were of that high quality, at least in terms of being way ahead of their contemporaries - in fact both Britain and France probably had better tanks in 1940, and the Soviets certainly did in 1941/42. What gave the Germans the success was the concepts by which they were used, the training and the command and control of them in the field.

    • @idk_just_julius
      @idk_just_julius 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@zenmollusc6128 well germany was better at the start but due to lack of recouses they fell off.

    • @realwarbeast
      @realwarbeast 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You recognise what german military loses 7 mln and Soviets 9? Right?
      Whe rest of soviet loses was from civilians what United Europe soldiers slaughtered without any hesitation.

    • @zenmollusc6128
      @zenmollusc6128 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@idk_just_julius I disagree, I think even with the resources (and they had a lot) they were always going to lose a protracted war against multiple opponents. Even if the USA had stayed out of Europe and focused on Japan, the combined might of the USSR and Commonwealth would have flattened them eventually.

    • @zenmollusc6128
      @zenmollusc6128 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@realwarbeastthe only sense of "united Europe" at that time was how widespread resistance was against the Nazis. Yes, some traitors fought for them but many of them got what was coming to them.

  • @tonelloable
    @tonelloable 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +137

    Mad respect for Russia to put modern US equipment in the museum 😂😂😂

    • @AlexSanchez-ms4oz
      @AlexSanchez-ms4oz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I know you are mostly fed by russia propaganda but some American company in Louisiana obtained a modern Russian T-90 and various Russian missile systems...imagine that, how did that russian equipment made it all the way to Louisiana
      .

    • @elite6848
      @elite6848 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Stop coping and get of the american propaganda, just enjoy that fact that us made equipment is in Russian hands

    • @d-4073
      @d-4073 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@elite6848 Well Russia has lost hundreds of thousands of men, and thousands of pieces of equipment but I guess that doesn't matter since they captured some 40 year old western equipment

    • @elite6848
      @elite6848 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@d-4073 that western gear isnt older than what Russia lost, yall lost more in iraq and Afghanistan…

    • @d-4073
      @d-4073 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@elite6848 Russia loses monthly the amount of equipment the US has lost in both of those wars

  • @nikola12nis
    @nikola12nis 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +666

    Those Japanese tanks were mostly intended for light operations. China was mostly hills and mountains, and nothing heavy was viable, especially when considering the southern part, where it was even worse with Jungles. Even in '39, the Soviet tanks were superior to their Japanese counterparts (which was proven during the battle of Khalkhin Gol). Superior as in the whole package, as armor at the time was 13-25mm thick at most, and anything you hit was going to be penetrated in most cases. Only in 1942 did they start arming tanks with a higher velocity 47mm, which was a bit too late. And then, 1945 comes and the Soviets just annihilate the Kwantung army. There was nothing the Japanese could have done to fight such an advanced army.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

      thank you so much I am grateful for such knowledgeable comments I am amazed at the intelligence of our subscribers. You guys are above and beyond when it comes to putting information onto a comment.

    • @Scrat335
      @Scrat335 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

      Japanese tanks were good enough for what they were up against all things considered. They were outclassed by US tanks though later in the war not to mention Soviet tanks in 1945.

    • @diawannoto
      @diawannoto 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      for me japan is a nation with little resources, they can't build more tanks and Ships, even their famous Zero is because they don't have enough steel / aluminium, hence they want to occupy southern asia and china, because they're rich in resources.

    • @frenak12
      @frenak12 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@diawannoto its really impressive they even reached the heights they did, with so little to work with in comparison to the other big powers at the time

    • @haruusami1831
      @haruusami1831 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@frenak12 Yeah but let's not forget that Japan at that time is one of the biggest naval power, especially in Asia its the only asian country have that kind of navy at that time, adding most Asians Countries at that time has little to no mechanized stuff, and not much of a military and China was still exhausted from its civil war, US in Philippines was unprepared, as well as in Pearl Harbor.
      They have alot to work with but they stretched far too thin their military and their important ships got most of them f*** in Midway, lost alot of their experienced soldier, their tanks didn't develop much cause of infighting between two branches who get prioritized and it was the navy.

  • @Gorsky69
    @Gorsky69 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +115

    When I served two years in the 2nd Infantry Division of Taman, this park was not in this place . There was a powerful training ground with target fields 1-3 km wide and up to 10 km long .

    • @user-lh5zr2yj3y
      @user-lh5zr2yj3y 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      And now you're already dead or you're going to be dead this year or next?

    • @ivke4533
      @ivke4533 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      funny guess@@user-lh5zr2yj3y

    • @user-us8sy3bl7v
      @user-us8sy3bl7v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​​​@@user-lh5zr2yj3yнет, умрет украинский националист и наёмник Джон, который приехал помогать националисту Мыколе 😁.
      Yankee go home! 😄
      Мы все равно сделаем как надо нам у наших границ., сколько бы оружия вы не поставляли или не давали денег в долг.

    • @kittyclaws7657
      @kittyclaws7657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-lh5zr2yj3y keep coping, trash

    • @ashog1426
      @ashog1426 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-lh5zr2yj3ydarkkrainian 😢

  • @thatdawghouse
    @thatdawghouse 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Great to see the display, I was over there a long time back & a friend from St Petersburg showed me around that park. Looks like they really improved the whole thing with the new added vehicles & equipment. Really crisp vid & excellent editing, great work man ty

  • @sandergoejer6173
    @sandergoejer6173 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

    The M113 in 22:18 is actually a Licensed build and slightly modified version of the M113, made In the Netherlands called the "YPR 765". Inside the waring sign is also in Dutch instead of English. They are no longer in active service in the Netherlands and were formerly also operated by the Belgians, and currently still in service with the Egytian, Jordanian, Chillean, Bahrainian and now Ukrainian militaries. Although very similar to the M113, this vehicle is not "American equipment" as the Americans never operated any. (But to be fair part of the vehicles components and the base design are American). Its pretty safe to assume that this vehicle Is Dutch buildt and formerly operated by the Netherlands before being donated to Ukraine and subsequently captured by Russia, as the Netherlands is for as far as I know the only country to have publicly announced back in 2022 to have donated 196 of such vehicles.
    Interesting to see nonetheless, never expected a vehicle buildt close to where I live to end up in a Russian museum.

    • @AndreAKAua
      @AndreAKAua 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Bro, stop, you are ruining Russian propaganda attempts

    • @just-incase3483
      @just-incase3483 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@AndreAKAuadoesn’t matter, it was still captured and is now a museum piece.

    • @dutch-1989.
      @dutch-1989. 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes true its a Dutch Design m113 far better than the original m113

    • @pindakaas1212
      @pindakaas1212 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Inside the cabin one can see [Waarschuwing]", meaning "warning".
      Easy identifier to be used in much of the online footage as well.

    • @thegermanempire489
      @thegermanempire489 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      M113 actually, the M103 was a US Heavy tank built during the 50s and 60s

  • @doriruru4744
    @doriruru4744 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +168

    Didn't know there was an exhibition like this. Gonna check it out myself if I'll be around Moscow in the future

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ITS A MUST! See you at the premier let me know what you thought of the video when it's done!

    • @ernstwiltmann6
      @ernstwiltmann6 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      "Through the eyes of" Anja, a wonderful Polish Lady was touring this Museum a while ago too, She made me aware of it. This Museum is on my buckett list now.
      Greetings from Canada.

    • @JIUNnF
      @JIUNnF 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Музей авиации добавьте в свой список прсещений.

    • @user-Z0V
      @user-Z0V 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Возможно эта информация будет шоком, но в России есть очень много того, чего, как говорят западные политические СМИ, в России быть не может. Вот такая метаморфоза, быть не должно, а оно есть😉

    • @simonewing4222
      @simonewing4222 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if Moscow is around in the future 🤣

  • @AndrewTakkep
    @AndrewTakkep 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +139

    My friend, you definitely need to visit the museum complex in Verkhnyaya Pyshma. This is in the Urals, near Yekaterinburg. All the tanks of the allies are presented there: the USSR, the USA and Great Britain, which participated in the Second World War.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I will be visiting so many museums when I’m back. Thank you so much for the suggestion please do consider sharing the video.

    • @dinosaure_jr4595
      @dinosaure_jr4595 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Dude he called the military special operation a war !? Bring him to prison !

    • @dinosaure_jr4595
      @dinosaure_jr4595 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Wild-Siberiashame on you !
      Putin will put you in the gulag !
      ATTENTION ON WHAT YOURE SAYING don’t speed nato aggressor propaganda

    • @user-fo3ex5nw7q
      @user-fo3ex5nw7q 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dinosaure_jr4595как смешно

    • @german_novotiable
      @german_novotiable 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dinosaure_jr4595 after putler called the conflict the war, they stopped punishing people for that, lol.

  • @LestatThe13
    @LestatThe13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Soon the museum will added new collection fresh from the front line M1A1 Abrams and Leopard 2 A6

    • @onenfred806
      @onenfred806 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They are captured by Russian Forces❤ super power 1

    • @mr_movieguru
      @mr_movieguru หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hahah and how many of Russian equipment already has been destroyed or captured.

    • @Perrirodan1
      @Perrirodan1 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@mr_movieguru You think just like the German did, ah how many soviet tank we killed! we are gonna win the war !!
      Check a history book to see who won in the end.

    • @GoodFella-xw8yx
      @GoodFella-xw8yx หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mr_movieguruvery little cause US does not stand q chance in this war.Ukraine lost 85% worlds military equipment in just 6 months.We have not used 5% of our old Soviet era weapons.Let’s dance ❤️🇷🇺

  • @rubyk334
    @rubyk334 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    Funding a war with more than 100 billions, sending mercenaries, Intel and guns munitions etc but we are not in war with them 😂😂😂

    • @eagleone5456
      @eagleone5456 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      We aren't sending mercs, even worse we are sending advisors and "volunteers"

    • @sudfac
      @sudfac 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's sad, but this will be largest trophy museum.

    • @anajeemcfarland1548
      @anajeemcfarland1548 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We aren’t more than half of these were either bought or captured from terrorists 🤦🏾 nobody else uses mraps of that type but the us and they don’t get captured or destroyed easily they were bought from surplus 🤦🏾

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      You’re not American you’re also not a real military person so you wouldn’t understand what war is
      Don’t talk as if you knew

    • @anajeemcfarland1548
      @anajeemcfarland1548 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Wild-Siberia nigga I am American and there have been people on TH-cam who has military experience who said the same shit how can Russia have destroyed mraps when we never came into contact with the Russian but 1 time and it was the wager pmc group Russia and America has had no great conflict but the oil field but Russia didn’t k ow it was occupied that’s the only time and there were no vehicles use I know exactly wtf I’m talking about don’t get mad cuz I stated straight facts and came with shit to back it up born and raised in California 🤦🏾 Sacramento where it began😂😂😂😂

  • @niker815
    @niker815 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +221

    Thank you very much for the video! I recently visited this park in August; unfortunately, the exhibition with captured weapons was closed to individual visits. You should definitely visit the "Memory Road" museum, which is located around the temple of the armed forces you mentioned. In my opinion, this is one of the best museums in Russia. Nevertheless, it’s very cool that you got so far, to the Patriot Park all the way from Irkutsk. Keep it up!

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      thank you so much for the support my friend. I am so happy that you got to visit the park. Please do remember to share the video if possible. Thanks for taking the time to watch.

  • @feel_the_walk
    @feel_the_walk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +298

    As an American, I love discovering USSR❤ I am currently in Uzbekistan, I film Walking video tours for TH-cam just for free. It is my passion now

    • @69rus42
      @69rus42 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Where have you already been? I have been to Uzbekistan, beautiful mosques and mosaics, also very tasty melons, samsa, and pilaf!

    • @xxxlik8805
      @xxxlik8805 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      They have the best cuisine in Central Asia

    • @Paul_Sergeyev
      @Paul_Sergeyev 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Come to Moscow - would love to hang out!

    • @ivanbernatek5585
      @ivanbernatek5585 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      USSSR dissolved like 30 years ago. Russkies have problems accept that. They will learn soon enough.

    • @feel_the_walk
      @feel_the_walk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@xxxlik8805 oh yeah

  • @Jed_Eckert
    @Jed_Eckert หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Makes me sick to my stomach but I don’t blame Russia for doing it.

  • @airuldaim
    @airuldaim 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I feel what you feel man. Sometimes the flashbacks keep coming when you are at the situation or when you with a piece of equipment you remember the memory.
    Their who at the war in combat area will know the feeling. Lot of noise from gun and bombs . The shock waves at the blast and the smells of battlefield. Thanks God it just memory..

  • @user-jq3qk2nq2q
    @user-jq3qk2nq2q 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    If you are interested in Soviet and Russian Aviation, I advise you to visit the Central Air Force Museum in Monino. It is not far from Moscow.
    For example, there is the largest helicopter in the history of the B-12.

  • @Gorsky69
    @Gorsky69 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    An American could visit the chic tank museum in Kubinka , which is located next to Patriot Park . There is also a permanent deployment point of the 4th Tank Kantemirovskaya Division .

    • @jamesgornall5731
      @jamesgornall5731 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not at the moment, they aren't issuing tourist visas to Americans

    • @user-wy7lj2bo7p
      @user-wy7lj2bo7p 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Any Abrams there? )

  • @bh3959
    @bh3959 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Why are you wondering why you see a Sherman M4? More than 4000 were given to the Soviet as part of the lend-lease deal. If you are a veteran, it seems that your military and historical knowledge is quite limited!!!

    • @MagnificentPig
      @MagnificentPig 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You think this dude is a ww2 vet? How is he supposed to know what we gave the soviets 70 years ago

    • @imfleazz1113
      @imfleazz1113 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@MagnificentPig history class probably lol

    • @josephr9930
      @josephr9930 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MagnificentPig That is a basic fact. The Americans saved the Russians by supplying them weapons and tanks. Russia was getting routed by the Nazis. Russians are not good fighters, they just have a really large army. The Russian soldier lacks discipline, and many are drunks. Russian alcohol consumption rates highest in the world. It is a country of drunks and the men die relatively young because of alcohol. This guy at the museum is probably a drunk too. 😂

  • @SPQR3ROME
    @SPQR3ROME 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you brother for the walk to the Patriot. Alive in Russia but haven’t been there. There is an artillery museum in St. Petersburg, I recommend it

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      When I’m back in Russia I plan on visiting lots of these museums

  • @evilleader1991
    @evilleader1991 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    Japanese tanks were smaller by design due to the areas they were deployed in. It's difficult to have a large tank move through rainforests and through the narrow alleyways of Asian cities + fighting in all the islands.

    • @neilgromov6473
      @neilgromov6473 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Лес танку не помеха, он не должен шнырять как заяц между деревьями, он должен из валить и делать просеку

    • @strannik2925
      @strannik2925 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Да я согласен с Вами, и немного добавлю. Они по большей части предназначались для десантных операций на которых используется легкая техника

    • @ArchOfficial
      @ArchOfficial 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They were smaller primarily to save materials. Modern Japanese tanks are large.

  • @valvaldorf4005
    @valvaldorf4005 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    Не подарили , а продали . И в этом вся сущность американского капитализма . Успеха .

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      yes, I understand this and they did it with bad intentions. Thank you so much for watching this video. Thank you for the comment. Please consider sharing this video.

    • @69rus42
      @69rus42 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ты ошибаешься

    • @user-br4vm2co8t
      @user-br4vm2co8t 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      точно, последние счета за эти "подарки" по ленд-лизу были оплачены только в 2006 году

    • @alex-0
      @alex-0 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ага давай расскажи сколько поставили и сколько заплатили за это. Очень интересно послушать.

    • @olgabaranovskaya8529
      @olgabaranovskaya8529 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Причина всегда одна - стремление США контролировать все страны мира, зарабатывать деньги на чужих войнах, провоцировать раздел чужих территорий и участвовать в нем. Советский Союз выплачивал долги за «дружественную помощь» в течение 45 лет. Затем долги по ленд-лизу перешли к России после развала Союза (в котором важную роль сыграли США) и она эти долги погашала до середины 2000-х. С Украиной будет еще хуже - она на долгие годы попала в настоящее рабство у Штатов, и несколько поколений украинцев заплатят деньгами, зерном, землей, ресурсами, разрешением разместить военные базы США, биологическими лабораториями, отречением от православия, принятие «ценностей» других людей. и т. д. Это помощь «Иуды», а не друга, как в СССР и сейчас на Украине. И Запад сегодня тоже является вассалом Штатов. Забавно слушать некоторые "заявления" марионеток ЕС, которые они читают по методичкам из Вашингтона. Хотя за всем этим постоянно маячит тень британцев)) (они вовремя сбежали из ЕС). И я, конечно, говорю не о простых американцах, англичанах, европейцах, а о мировых кукловодах...

  • @buxtehude123
    @buxtehude123 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This museum added American Abrams tanks and German Leopard 2s.

  • @shashankojha368
    @shashankojha368 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +77

    8:30 The Sherman is not exactly a bad tank. It was upgraded and modified a lot through out the second World War. It was the second most produced tank in WW2 for that reason. Later in the war the Shermans were equipped with the 75mm gun which could penetrate German tanks at that time. For this reason, German tankers would generally target the Shermans with a 75mm gun. In Fury, this the only reason that Don's crew is able to kill the Tiger, although realistically at that range a normal Sherman could also probably pen it. The Sherman was also modified into a heavy tank, nicknamed the "Jumbo", it had more armour and a better gun.
    13:45 The Japanese tanks weren't effect...in tank vs tank warfare. Japanese tanks were made primarily to support infantry and destroy fortified positions. The majority of the tank fighting the Japanese did were against lightly armoured American/Russian tanks, until later in the war. However even then they didn't really develop their tanks much. So yes, they suck against tanks, but that wasn't their primary role.
    20:48 Butterfly mines are actually considered to be illegal to use in war. The reason for this is because children will often mistake them for plastic toys, pick them up and you can guess the rest.

    • @KekusMagnus
      @KekusMagnus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      You meant 76mm gun. 75mm shermans were excellent tanks for 1942-1943 but by 1944 they were quite outdated and they weren't replaced fast enough. In many fights they had to win by sheer numbers, kind of like 76mm T-34s had to do when facing tigers early in the war

    • @shashankojha368
      @shashankojha368 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KekusMagnus Yeah my bad.

    • @user-rn9vf7im6g
      @user-rn9vf7im6g 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@KekusMagnus Did T-34s clash with tigers at the beginning of the war? Why write nonsense?

    • @T33K3SS3LCH3N
      @T33K3SS3LCH3N 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@user-rn9vf7im6git's plenty obvious that "early" just means in earlier stages before the T-34-85 became common.

    • @pipopoikapelaa5468
      @pipopoikapelaa5468 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@KekusMagnusthe 75mm Sherman maybe wasn't great against some enemy tanks but it was excellent against enemy infantrymen, which was the enemy it mostly faced

  • @aojschatchuewtchuew2563
    @aojschatchuewtchuew2563 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +199

    Ребята хорошее видео, трофеи всех времён от Второй мировой до наших дней, главное мир и дружба между народами, странами, континентами.....ждем новых видео 🎥📹📼

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      thank you so much for your endless support. You know it means a lot to me my friend please if you can also share the video so that more people can see this. Thank you.

    • @aojschatchuewtchuew2563
      @aojschatchuewtchuew2563 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      ​@@Wild-Siberiaтебя мой друг смотрит Германия, Россия, твой взгляд как ветерана войны в Афганистане..... Твоё мнение что ты слышал о России с экранов ТВ, СМИ и то что ты увидел сам в бескрайней России...... Тут есть мнение и не только тебе надо открыть свой канал СМИ, твоё видео прогулка по Лос-Анджелесе и в России сравнение что и как многие не верят в это и думают что это фейк Я им говорю это человек мексиканец американского происхождения ему врать, обманывать нету резона... удивление не меньше что ему внушали и что он сам увидел своими глазами, потрогал всё руками..... Сестра супер привози её в Россию и выдай тут замуж.... Когда обратно в Россию, когда будет предложение руки и сердца, мы всё ждём этого...... Ксении большой привет из России и Германии

    • @user-lg6tm2wn5r
      @user-lg6tm2wn5r 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Да, конечно, но оружейные корпорации Америки так не думают. Деньги и ещё раз деньги.

    • @aojschatchuewtchuew2563
      @aojschatchuewtchuew2563 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-lg6tm2wn5r как говорят американцы " Бизнес есть бизнес и только бизнес " А на чем бизнес какой всём на всё плевать, даже война приносить деньги 🤑💸💵💴💶💰💳 кому-то война злая тёща а кому-то мать родная......

    • @jak_freski
      @jak_freski 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Урааа, Я думал сейчас зайду в комментарии и первый русскоязычный комментарий будет с какой-нибудь глупой провокацией, но нет❤

  • @AussieSpy
    @AussieSpy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    This is a great video Dan! Thanks for sharing.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks so much for being there for the premier !

  • @mitchyoung93
    @mitchyoung93 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice to hear a more personal view of this park and to hear some 'war stories'. Dasha from @DashaTechnik also visited this park and has a more technical review of some of the recently captured equipment, in Russian but the auto generated subtitles are pretty good.

  • @davidjames-rp6oi
    @davidjames-rp6oi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    great vid, limey here! my father was in the british 8th army, the sherman had the nickname "ronson" which was a lighter because they caught fire so easy.there was a firefly version, with a uk built gun that could knock out tigers

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🫡🙏🏻

  • @sidnelson9379
    @sidnelson9379 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    These last two videos have been heart and soul poring out. A lot of work pulled into concise videos. Keep on working hard at it , a day at a time. Story-Teller Max!
    Aloha from Big Island- looking forward to Alex and others refreshing the commentary on the names and types of recognized weaponry here in these comments.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You've been here from the start thanks so much!

    • @sidnelson9379
      @sidnelson9379 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Wild-Siberia 🤙🤙🤙🙏🙏🙏

  • @MrTgyhujik
    @MrTgyhujik 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    Среди немецких трофеев для меня огромный интерес вызвали венгерские танки Толди и Туран, а так же самоходные противотанковые орудия и зенитки. Они там обозначались красно-бело-зелеными крестами. Не каждый бронетанковый музей может похвастаться такими экспонатами.Венгерская бронетехника, естественно, гораздо слабее немецкой,сопоставима с японской, но гораздо лучше итальянской. Бронеавтомобиль Мамба ЮАР перепродала Украине Эстония. Выстрелы были слышны от располагающего неподалеку огромного учебно-тренировочного стрельбища.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      wow, you know so, much is so cool to read such comment. Thank you for taking the time to watch the video. Thank you for taking the time to comment. I appreciate your support. Please do consider sharing the video my friend.

    • @Ivan_Ivanov_
      @Ivan_Ivanov_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      От некоторых танков пахнет мазутом, очень атмосферно(ису 100, например) 😊👍

    • @StazherEzhov
      @StazherEzhov 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Согласен, но на половину.
      С одной стороны - итальянская танковая школа конца 1930-х и до 1944 года пребывала в очень странном состоянии. Итальянцы сделали большую ставку на танкетки, но война в Эфиопии и в Испании показала ущербность и бесперспективность этих машин (несмотря на попытки повысить их боевые возможность, типа установки огнемёта). А вот с конца 1930-х, после изучения захваченного в Испании Т-26, итальянцы взялись за производство настоящих, пусть и не выдающихся, но танков. И что удивительно - на основе Т-26/Виккерс-Е они умудрились создать серию лёгких (по итальянской тогдашней классификации -- средних) танков, тяжёлый танк P26/40 (который создавался с оглядкой на Т-34) и штурмовые орудия, которые, к слову, получились очень удачными, немцы даже развернули их производство для себя после оккупации Италии в 1943. К тому же, пока итальянцы воевали в Африке, их основными противниками были так же не самые выдающиеся британские танки (кроме Матильды), пока англичане не получили в достаточных количествах американские "стюарты" и "ли".
      Другая сторона медали - итальянцы так и не смогли в сварную броню. P26/40, первый прототип которого был представлен в декабре 1941, а в серию пошёл только весной 1943, имел клёпаную броню, что было уже глубокой архаикой для того времени, а к этому ещё и очень ненадёжный дизельный двигатель и одноместную башню (и это был самый совершенный итальянский танк на тот момент). Они не смогли оснастить свои "средние" танки эффективными орудиями - да, для 1940 года 47-мм пушки были более чем неплохи, но в 1943 они стали практически бесполезными против большинства танков СССР и Союзников. Кроме того, темпы производства были довольно низкими, хуже дела в этом плане были только у японцев.

    • @robincandy5007
      @robincandy5007 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was wondering how the Mamba got there

  • @justafloridamanfromthe75thRR
    @justafloridamanfromthe75thRR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good content mate!! Thank you for sharing this, it's mind-boggling to see this! Cheers!

  • @preemet
    @preemet 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Once again history repeats itself and the whole world must unite to resist fascism.

  • @frommordorwithlove4844
    @frommordorwithlove4844 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    After the collapse of the USSR, the Russian Federation in April 1993 took upon itself the payment of all Soviet debts, including Lend-Lease obligations to the United States. The Soviet debt for Lend-Lease supplies was finally paid and closed as part of settlements with the Paris Club on August 21, 2006

    • @thisisemchii
      @thisisemchii 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and as all empires, they stole from their republics to grow their wealth. they paid with gas and oil that the west buys off them. which average russians have nothing to do with. realistically they didn't pay back shit.

    • @comhydro6391
      @comhydro6391 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought the soviets finished paying off their lend lease debt in the 1980s. Maybe the 70s.

    • @RobinPhillips1957
      @RobinPhillips1957 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@comhydro6391 No! Nearly the same time as the UK! The USA's closest ally! Tony Blair made the final payment. The US gave very little free!

    •  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RobinPhillips1957 But it was nice from their side to cancel half of Polish debt thanks to Polish Special Forces and "Operation Simoom", "As a reward for Poland's help, the US government promised to urge other governments to cancel half, or $16.5 billion, of Poland's foreign debt.

    • @ziqqqqqqq
      @ziqqqqqqq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you know how much the lend lease total cost?? Damn I never knew russia paid it..

  • @svenrechburg4364
    @svenrechburg4364 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    There's also a little italian Fiat Tank. So cute😄 The new cathedral of the russian army is incredible beautiful. Don't forget to visit the museum of 1418 steps. This park is really huge.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yes, I can’t wait to visit the rest of the park when I come back to Moscow thanks for noticing those kind of things and commenting you know I appreciate it

    • @Jan_372
      @Jan_372 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      an L3 series? or the self driving gun next to the StuG 3?

    • @danielpetrucci8952
      @danielpetrucci8952 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Soviet S-100 tank desoryer was sick

  • @mihaildimitrov3870
    @mihaildimitrov3870 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Its strange to see a person who is supposedly interested in military hardware and was a part of the military, knowing so little about history, giving the most vague and uneducated commentary. The Sherman is there because of the Lend-Lease Act. This is something you learn almost immediately when you take interest in military history...

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I was an infantryman/sapper not a history expert nor a modern armor expert I still can like these things … nothing strange about that relax

    • @peterko8871
      @peterko8871 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He says a lot of bullshit all across the video :)) Like "Germans are turning in their graves ":) But not mentioning the Soviets lost 15-20 million lives in the war...And I'm not even mentioning the Soviets started the 2WW by dividing Poland with the Nazis

  • @vrrc7686
    @vrrc7686 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you for the video. I live in North Carolina and this has been mind opening. Cheers

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🙏🏻🫡

  • @LuiseSky
    @LuiseSky 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +162

    Thank you for so carefully commenting of exhibition. It turned out that the whole story passes through the prism of personal experience, and not so much the current war itself.
    Also, how sad that in one exhibition there are 2 lend-lease from different centuries, but with completely different contexts

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      wow, I have not thought about it like that. Thanks for opening my eyes. Thank you for supporting by watching the video again please do share if possible.

    • @AndrewTakkep
      @AndrewTakkep 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      2 ленд-лиза ... Какое точное наблюдение!👍

    • @user-wo9ib3mt5i
      @user-wo9ib3mt5i 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Wild-Siberia Any plans to make a vlog at the Kubinka tank museum? It has kilotons of metal beasts from various countries, including the ones which weren't captured during WW2 by the UK, USA or others (not only the fearsome Maus is on the list so far).

    • @hg7728
      @hg7728 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Completely same concept both fights Nazis one just wanted to exterminate jews the others Ukrainians

    • @neurofiedyamato8763
      @neurofiedyamato8763 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I worried the video might get political but good to see it didn't

  • @Gorgoth_siberian
    @Gorgoth_siberian 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Great video , man!! thank you for the tour! really, living 8 years in moscow i never even thought to visit patriot park except shooting range, and some exact expos just couple times since i live here. never went to walk around vehicles expo.
    but always driving around park patriot to shooting range.
    i kinda been there, but not that close! so thanks! my daughter asked to show her all that, when i watched your vid. so i will go there with family :)

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      my dear friend, it is a must visit, not only for us historical value, but it’s current event values. Next year I want to visit the shooting range the people have mentioned.
      thanks for supporting the channel with your comment and your view. Please do consider sharing the video to grow the community

  • @baddowboy
    @baddowboy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video, the Sherman is a very early model compared to the 1944 Tiger and T34 versions you film and compare to,
    hence it looks fairly under armored and outgunned.
    If you compare it to a Panzer 3 you would be comparing a like for like fighting vehicle.
    Great video though the camera was very smooth and in focus.
    Good job.
    Jb.

  • @NEKRWSPHERE
    @NEKRWSPHERE 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    It's not just "quantity over quality". What's absolutely crucial is that it's a quantity of exactly the same battle tanks, or tanks which shared spare parts between one another for easy repair and re-fitting. This also simplified training. Right now even if Ukraine had "quantity" - it would not be successful against Russia, and one of the reasons is - this quantity would be disparate equipment with differing non-matching spare parts and shells, different training required to operate it (as is the case with F-16). In a war theatre that is as environment-intensive as Ukraine having disparate, non-matching equipment means that 50^ of it or more will remain useless and couldn't participate in maneuvers at any given time. As far as American Shermans, - they as well as other tanks and equipment (like British "Matilda" tank - were part of Allied Lendlease to USSR. These tanks were already outgunned and outmatched by 1942-43, but they could still be used in limited operations or as infantry support, and they were used almost until the very end of the war.
    Now, as for Tiger" - it was not a well engineered tank at all, not for the Soviet war theatre. More of these got broken down and abandoned than taken out by the Soviet cannons. It was too heavy for "chernozem" soils, overlapping wheels made it very difficult to repair in the field, while frost/ice made them stick together. It wasn't maneuverable enough on rough ground and ambushes with front and rearmost tanks rendered inoperable and the rest of the column - easy pickings for artillery became a World War II "classic" in part due to such heavy tanks. The Germans sacrificed everything for thick frontal armor and large caliber canon, pretty terrible miscalculation on their part.

  • @Gorsky69
    @Gorsky69 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

    We saw a great report from Russia . Thanks , man ! Russia is a wonderful country !

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thanks a lot for watching! I appreciate the time please consider sharing ;D

    • @user-gq8vk9qg3d
      @user-gq8vk9qg3d 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We know it

  • @SHKIPERsf
    @SHKIPERsf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    The Panther tank that was in the video is in full working order, there is a series of videos about it with a mechanic who "takes care" of this tank - «Пантера» парка «Патриот» this is a series of three videos in Russian and there is also an interview "Евгений Москалев: я - водитель «Пантеры»!".
    If you are interested in the history and technical part of the Panther tank, I advise you to look. Moreover, now you can watch videos with real-time translation, you know through what, they won't advertise here)

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      yes, all is good. Thank you so much for actually commenting this. It is an insanely cool fun fact thanks for watching the video. Please also consider sharing the video so our community can grow.

    • @Klovaneer
      @Klovaneer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Panther is cool but the Jagdpanther is a work of art, hope it's also running or at least planned to.

    • @SHKIPERsf
      @SHKIPERsf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Klovaneer Unfortunately, I do not know anything about Jagdpanther recovery.
      Almost all of these vehicles were captured in battle and were damaged to one degree or another.
      Almost all the cars were disassembled, studied and not always assembled back to the end. For example, the same Panther did not have the hydraulic drive of the tower returned, the tower rotates only manually with the help of flywheels.
      Maybe they will be restored in the future, but based on what the museum mechanic of the Panther told, it will be a difficult and expensive process, because for the same Panther, some parts had to be made from scratch on their own, they gave the engine to a third-party organization, I don't remember the name, so that they would restore it.
      Old mechanisms require large investments, alas.

  • @novak7970
    @novak7970 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video. I was at Patriot Park shortly before Covid lockdowns etc. Many other outer buildings that house German WW2 trucks and staff cars etc. Also obscure Axis vehicles. A gun range, tank biathlon course and much more. You need at least a full day. Just subscribed to your channel.

    • @randy804
      @randy804 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia had covid lockdowns?

  • @alanmachin3838
    @alanmachin3838 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The Quality of the Tiger tanks is not necessarily "superior" it depends on how you measure it. They were notoriously prone to mechanical failure and combined with their limited number meant that they were never war winning machines. But great on paper... and when working properly.

  • @Scrat335
    @Scrat335 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    4:20. A Soviet T-70 light tank. Used in WWII was not capable of standing up to any German tank but it did very well in the north of Russia. They were used in forested areas around St Pete and other localities. Their superior mobility and 20 mm autocannons made them deadly against fortifications, destroying bunkers and strong points in villages.

    • @user-me5oq3kl4h
      @user-me5oq3kl4h 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      T-70 had 45 mm gun. What you think of is t-60 light tank. That one had 20 mm

    • @user-ib9sw7id9r
      @user-ib9sw7id9r 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I think the Т70 perfectly resisted the German Т1, Т2 and Т3. Why compare a light Russian tank with an average German one, forgetting about the light German ones?

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You should have compared T-70 not again Tigers and Panthers, but again German tanks of the same weight category - light tanks. T-70 was way way better than German counterparts - light tanks T-1 and T-2. It was also better than Czech tank LT. vz.38 that also served in German army in massive numbers. Heavy and light tanks are intended for different tasks and purposes but each category has its own importancy.

    • @Scrat335
      @Scrat335 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AlexanderTch When did the T-70 ever face a German light tank? Next to never. The vast majority of German tanks were Mk 3 or Mk 4s. I'm not saying it didn't happen but it was certainly not often.

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Scrat335 Т-70s met German and Japanese light tanks everywhere. Besides, tanks are not intended to meet another tanks , especially light tanks. Light tanks are for supporting infantry , for patrolling areas, for scouting. In some cases they helped a lot what bridges were light or it was necessary to cross big rivers and lakes by ice, like it happened under Leningrad.

  • @ru_SanSanych_ru
    @ru_SanSanych_ru 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Флешбеки на выходе начались. Когда в сердцах чертехнулся. К сожалению, люди никогда не перестанут соревноваться с другими людьми в размере дубинки.

    • @reedywatt1754
      @reedywatt1754 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Я бы добавил про мужиков в бане и мерило другое. Только у мужиков к старости попускает, а у политиков к старости разбирает!

    • @69rus42
      @69rus42 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Это любят делать те, кто сами дубину в руки не берут. Посылают других.

    • @mrobocop1666
      @mrobocop1666 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Пока есть люди, будет и война. Но у неё есть и обратная сторона в виде резкого толчка и развития всех технологий. Тот же ядерная энергетика, Интернет, всё это продукты чисто военных исследований

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      do you know I didn’t realize that the flashbacks were going to happen until they were already on my head because of the firing in the background because of the equipment. Anyways, my friend thank you so much for watching. I hope you could share this video. I hope you enjoyed it somehow.

    • @Quasisaur
      @Quasisaur 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Wild-Siberia You seemed much happier when you were swimming in Baikal and making bbq on river bank wi Ksenia to be honest. I hope you will be back in no time 😁

  • @markfinch8048
    @markfinch8048 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice video. I was at the Kubinka tank museum a few years ago and that was pretty awesome. They have a WW2 German Maus tank.

  • @generalv2170
    @generalv2170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's not a pride thing, it's too preserve history so it doesn't repeat it self.

  • @rustyshackleford1508
    @rustyshackleford1508 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    People forget how old these weapons are. Even the most "cutting-edge" weapons systems we have are going on decades old, most of these date back to the Cold War in terms of design, going from 25 years to even 65 years old.

    • @neurofiedyamato8763
      @neurofiedyamato8763 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The original design is decades old but they received many upgrades and a lot of the cutting edge are new builds and not just refits. The ones being sent are however old.

    • @rustyshackleford1508
      @rustyshackleford1508 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@neurofiedyamato8763 The upgrades are important to note, but they don't ultimately change the vehicle's abilities by all that much. Survivability, maybe, but a modern APFSDS round slices through almost anything like butter, and you simply don't have enough horsepower in an engine, or even a turbine, to fully armor a vehicle to the point that it would become impervious to drones.

  • @Quasisaur
    @Quasisaur 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    This shot where kids play on top of german tank that was suppose to kill their ancestors so they would never born is kinda ironic. Life has a twisted sense of humour. And new generation of german tanks rolling east is like a history repeating itself. I wonder if history really teaches us anything if we keep coming to the same place over and over again 🤔

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      yes, this was my mentality as I saw those kids playing on the tanks was pretty dark in my head but I am happy that the kids have somewhere to play

    • @Quasisaur
      @Quasisaur 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Wild-Siberia Yeah. I mean - I understand that modern weapons are much more deadlier than those of WW2 but these german vehicles have some kind of dark aura around them whenever I see them - those strict square shapes and sharp angles it's like they are bearing that anti human idiology in them - dark machine spirit or smth like that. Especially Tiger tank - I bet those killed a lot of allies tech before they were stopped

    • @JIUNnF
      @JIUNnF 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Из раза в раз о том что война это пережиток прошлого мы обязанны обединится что бы неделимо а для всего человечества исследовать возможности освоения человечеством внеземных тела и решить тем самым(и это не пустые поетические триволнения это возможно но не в подобных обстоятелствах ведения хозяйственной деятелности не для всех и не для погибщих в синтетических противостояниях) не только энергетический тире экологический вопрос всего человечества а значить пригодности Земли к существованию потомков. Рассматривая вопрос покинет ли разумная жизнь пределов Солнечной системы.

  • @darehaleem6140
    @darehaleem6140 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great achievement by the Soviet Union.

    • @AndyAntrax
      @AndyAntrax 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Bro it was build in 2018

  • @tricky0048
    @tricky0048 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Dan, the question of whether one favors quantity over quality is almost derivative to the fact that when it comes to war, you should consider quantity and quality, but the innovative nature of humans can determine the situational use of the weapon eliminating the idea of quantity over quality but rather the idea of whether the application of the said weapon should be purposeful or simply based on the circumstances of the assault or attack. Sort of how a spider uses its webs to incapacitate smaller prey as opposed to venom that has selectively evolved to incapacitate mammals and larger prey

  • @MolantRF
    @MolantRF 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    Всегда приятно слушать профессионала в своей сфере. Это не пустые размышления некомпетентных блогеров. Как всегда ставлю лайк, и жаль что видео такое короткое...

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      when I go back to Moscow, I’ll make sure to document these things. I will make sure to study so that I can provide better quality reports. I also promise to make them at least 30 minutes long. Thanks for your support means a lot. Please consider sharing this video.

  •  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +152

    My Father was enrolled by force by the nazis. He fought in Stalingrad, Kursk, Kalatch bridge and many other places. He was released by Red Cross as a French Malgré Nous. He always told me that German soldiers were efficient but Russian soldiers were the bravest and the most courageous people he had to see. Thank you for this great visit.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      this is a beautiful story, and I respect to you and your family.

    • @vladvlad9964
      @vladvlad9964 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can you say such blunt lies... You just confused the Wehrmacht with putin's washing machines robbers army in Ukraine.... You try to tell to us that the germans take "people by force" in their army.????????????????????????????? Only the small putin take in his army, emigrants, criminals and murderers from the prison system, stupid mercenary from wagner... Germans were smart...They never put a gun in a arm that they cannot trust. STOP THE LIES ! You confused the state of drunkenness ,with "bravery"...It is easy to be "brave" when you you are drunk shitless and with an NKVD agent with Balalayka gun on your back. When you are communist or socialist you are just an idiot. Not brave .

    • @surfingtothestars
      @surfingtothestars 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "enrolled by force" That's a lie lol

    • @majorlobster3443
      @majorlobster3443 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@surfingtothestars ever heard of conscription?

    • @winnerwinnerchickendinner8809
      @winnerwinnerchickendinner8809 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great history to remained all of us only if we all can learn from history

  • @td6460
    @td6460 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Must be very cool for Russians to see countries that care about their soldiers, therefore manufacturing vehicles that actually protect their inhabitants instead of just immediately turning into fireballs upon enemy contact like the Russian stuff.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣

    • @bertvansas6100
      @bertvansas6100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      right on point EU loves american stuffff

  • @stevednky1369
    @stevednky1369 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That was a treat seeing Konstantin on your video!

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea he’s a cool guy!

  • @mcal27
    @mcal27 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The large Helicopter is the Mil-26. Some years ago Washington hired one to rescue a downed Chinook

  • @Mico605
    @Mico605 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +158

    My friend, those WW2 Soviet tanks were all around better than their German counterparts AND they were produced in massive numbers.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      yes, thank you so much but the Germans thought that they had superior technology and they thought that they would change the game with their tanks. This is all I was trying to explain sort of what they think now with her leopards. I hope that makes sense. Thank you so much for watching the video. Please do share it.

    • @Quasisaur
      @Quasisaur 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Wild-Siberia Allies had better half tracks than soviets that's why we were using American m3/ m5 half tracks to carry troops or use them a a transport for anti air guns like the one you showed us. They saved a lot of lives. And that Studebaker trucks - they were powerful enough to carry our heavy artillery - most of soviet heavy artillery trucks were lost during summer of 41 and then the spring counter offensive failed and german started their operation Blau to capture oil in Kavkaz region.

    • @Klovaneer
      @Klovaneer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      While in bare steel terms germans tank are not as well designed they were far more comfortable in operation but the deciding factors for germans blasting though soviets early on were doctrinal - much more flexible command and experienced officers that just went through Poland, Benelux and France. Soviets never caught up to germans in "quality ceiling" but wehrmacht was a husk of itself after bagration operation and could not reach that ceiling either.
      Russians opted to order more trucks and basic materiel through lend-lease because the weapons allies had were far more expensive than their own and often not suited for eastern front. Eg there is a somewhat plausible legend that .45ACP bullets wouldn't pierce heavy winter clothing as well as 7.62TT at a certain distance.

    • @foxskullspl8510
      @foxskullspl8510 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Certainly not better, but there were a lot of them

    • @majormassenspektrometer
      @majormassenspektrometer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They were not better just had the greater numbers. German tanks had radio equipment in each of them for example what the Russian lacked making communication and executing tactics easier. Russian tanks were pretty rough around the edges just as today. They lack modern equipment but they have greater numbers of them. And most of the time, that's the key for victory. They can build them cheaper and faster.

  • @AWACSSS
    @AWACSSS 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am from Saudi Arabia and I hope to visit this wonderful exhibition. I do not expect there to be an exhibition in the world that brings together all these weapons and tanks in one place, which is very beautiful.

  • @DlyaMira
    @DlyaMira 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I am in the U.S. Air Force, serving active duty. I'm still pretty new, nearly two years in and going on my second assignment after my first tour in Incirlik, Turkiye. I will say, I am a very big fan of you and I find your videos and commentary to be intriguing. Even though you have other Americans and veterans calling you a traitor and a propagandist and all that, I condemn them. You fought for your rights, you got your honorable discharge, and you're a friggen Marine. Once a Marine, always a Marine. I've always taken an interest in Russia, and it is quite nice to see someone with relevant skills and a relevant background (Department of Defense/U.S. Military) simply living in Russia, despite everything going on. You have a Marine background in war, I have an Air Force background in policing and logistics. I am still actively serving, but it would be really cool to meet up when my contract ends in a couple of years. I don't think I want to continue serving in the U.S. military for 18 more years. Much like you, I want to go off in the world and do my own things. I would not classify myself as a patriot and I personally have no allegiance to a flag, banner, or any set of ideals. Much like you, you're a Hispanic man from the United States and you're a veteran, and now you're doing you own thing in Russia. That is quite diverse if you ask me and that shows that you're willing to do whatever you want and no one will stop you. If one thing the U.S. military taught me during my time in, no one is going to do anything for you and no one will hold your hand. You must look out for yourself and you are your own best friend. If you want something, you must get it yourself. Set goals and priorities, because no one will care about what you want more than you.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      great comment listen, my citizenship is American and Mexican I love America but I love seeing the world. the military gave me only war 🤣 had this conflict not existed I wouldn’t be known and still be in Russia doing the same things.
      I pray for your health to stay good during your time in my friend serve your time and enjoy your life. thanks for watching and for being respectful

    • @DlyaMira
      @DlyaMira 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Wild-Siberia I appreciate you too and thank you for your service!

  • @foxhoundms9051
    @foxhoundms9051 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    The Sherman was actually a pretty good tank. Considering tanks are NOT for fighting other tanks 95% of the time.

    • @Mgaming61
      @Mgaming61 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yeah, it was quite capable when it came out as tank. But later on it became somewhat outdated, although for infantry having any tank is a blessing

    • @INTERSTATE-35-WARRIOR
      @INTERSTATE-35-WARRIOR 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@Mgaming61It was continually upgraded throughout the war like other tanks. Look up the M4A3 76(W) (Easy 8), Jumbo and other variants. I think the Sherman’s strength was its ability to be adapted to many different roles. The Israeli M51 Sherman is way different that the original M4. High velocity guns installed near the end of the war allowed the Sherman crack tiger armor as well!

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@INTERSTATE-35-WARRIOR If they'd started out with the same gun as the Firefly, it would've been an AWESOME tank. Especially with the later diesel engine.

    • @9mmfederalrimmed235
      @9mmfederalrimmed235 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Sherman had that dimensions to fit into ships since they had to be shipped over the ocean. The americans could not afford to build an Königstiger like the Germans since it was to big and heavy for ships. They figured better middle to light weight Shermans and then many instead a few heavy tanks. Thats why the Sherman was no match for the Königstiger - they just got shot down in drows and could only encounter an Königstiger by surroundig 6 Sherman strategically the german tank to knock him out firing full bores continuously. That is what the germans had to do as well with their Panzer 2's which could not match the soviet K1 so they surrounded the soviet tank and shot them in an Wolfsrudel tactic (many wolves is the lions death).
      But the Sherman was kept light in order to fit the transporting ships. He was not bad but the latest and greatest of the german tanks he could not risk an frontal confrontation. So other means took care than of the King Tiger.

    • @foxhoundms9051
      @foxhoundms9051 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@9mmfederalrimmed235 king tiger basically useless, bad fuel consumption, too heavy for bridges, easy to spot from air, slow, prone to mechanical breakdowns, hard to repair, etc, etc. Long story short, Shermans won, Tigers lost. Logistics.

  • @Light-wv1si
    @Light-wv1si 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    There is a large tank museum in Kubinka , it is not far from Patriot Park , if you have time , you will not regret visiting it !!!

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I promise I’m gonna be visiting so many museums, especially military museum when I go back to Moscow thanks for watching the video!

  • @RainbowBier
    @RainbowBier 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    wow disgusting, hope they send you the order for the front.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣 keep dreaming

  • @CoconutandFamily
    @CoconutandFamily 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I wish to all veterans to have a peaceful life and never experience the war again. I wish to all others to be smarter and never wish for a war.

  • @Facer125
    @Facer125 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Добрый день, позвольте вставить ремарку в ваш рассказ, ничего из выставленной американской техники не было подарено Советскому Союзу, а было куплено по программе лэнглиз.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      yes, thank you I had mentioned this in the video later on when I saw the writing on the boards but I do appreciate you putting in facts to the comment section.
      It is people like you who make this channel great never stop

    • @coldcadaver
      @coldcadaver หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Wild-Siberia but USSR never paid for leasing, so actually it was a gift

  • @RealReporter
    @RealReporter 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +137

    Great video, my friend! There's so much to see in this expo, and you did a fantastic job giving an insightful tour. Of course, the modern section was the highlight. I'm really glad we could experience it together.
    PS Still can’t figure out how you managed to film so much content in Moscow! 😅

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      this comment made me laugh, bro. I had three memory cards in my head planned videos. I only had 10 days to create different types of videos, so I came prepared.
      I learned a lot from you

    • @neilgromov6473
      @neilgromov6473 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Спасибо вам обоим, дорогие друзья! Мира и здоровья вам и вашим семьям!

    • @sergeyslessarenko7574
      @sergeyslessarenko7574 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Знаешь, я пожалуй проявлю верх наглости. Телега есть?

    • @jhardy7917
      @jhardy7917 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      BEING A SHILL HELPS

  • @Samsuuser88
    @Samsuuser88 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And thanx for current video itself

  • @lukilladog
    @lukilladog 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ...yo creo que la cantidad mientras se supere cierto grado de funcionalidad y calidad, obviamente los tanques rusos tenían lo suyo :P Buen video! ...y feliz navidad, prospero año y felicidad... Pd.- Que extraña barda "Mexicana" :O Pd.- Se pusieron creativos con los maniquies :O

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      En el pin comment

  • @aizhongwen
    @aizhongwen 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Thanks for sharing the war tanks weaponry from ancient to modern times like SMO. Dan has the knowledge about weapons due his experience in real war. The red submarine is great. The aircraft from Afghanistan looks strong. Thanks , God bless you !

  • @TigerTank237
    @TigerTank237 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is amazing... thx for the tour!

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @timpatrick2109
    @timpatrick2109 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Germans ran out of fuel and materials to produce more tanks. I’d go with quality over quantity any day.

  • @corbiny6652
    @corbiny6652 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome bro. Thank you

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for
      Watching

  • @Maverickf22flyer
    @Maverickf22flyer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I truly enjoyed your video so, just for the knowledge here, not other reasons, at 17:28 that's actually the fan of the RD-33 engine that you saw from the front. The turbine may look pretty similar but it's meant to be rotated by a fluid (gas or liquid) and it's always at the back of the engine, at the exhaust and it is spun by the exhaust to rotate the compressor and also the first stage which is that fan in front that you saw.

  • @a.t6066
    @a.t6066 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Very cool museums! Id love to see it one day.
    US provided pretty significant amounts of war materials to the soviets under lendlease. Their trucks were especially liked.
    And iirc, the USSR actually was the second largest lendlease user of m4 sherman behind the British. I think they got 4-5k sherman tanks of various types over the course of the war

  • @Veuxgames
    @Veuxgames 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like those led strips inside of the tracks, lets you see so much more detail. Thanks for the video!

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching

  • @PristineReviews
    @PristineReviews 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    great video, thank you for your military service

  • @fortunaMinecraft
    @fortunaMinecraft 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Very good video! You need to go back and update us on the new equipment!

  • @stallion78
    @stallion78 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Really enjoyed this episode. Thank You. I wish you were able to spend more time in there. It was really interesting. Especially more time with the captured equipment from Ukraine. Thanks again. And hope that conflict comes to and end soon.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I will be going back and doing an episode two we were only allowed a limited amount of time in there by the way. Thanks so much for watching. Please do consider sharing it.

  • @ExtraditionLawFirm
    @ExtraditionLawFirm 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    English-Speaking Russian Lawyers for Foreigners in Moscow are HERE!

  • @magni5648
    @magni5648 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Love how they can't even get the YPR-765 right and painted a US flag on it. Really Russia in a nutshell these days, even when they score the rare win they manage to embarass themselves.

    • @redemissarium
      @redemissarium หลายเดือนก่อน

      they are half built by FMC USA

  • @JayTulip
    @JayTulip 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I have shared where I could. Hope you get new subs, Dan, because your content is educational and informative.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks a lot Jay this was a special episode thanks a lot for the support!

  • @ParalyzedTank
    @ParalyzedTank 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    Non russian vehicles on the video:
    1. Panzer III Ausf. J/J1 (long barrel)
    2. Valentine mk.1
    3. Panzer IV ausf G
    4. Tank destroyer on the back (i forgot)
    5. Tiger H1 (also known as Pz.kpfw VI Ausf. H1)
    6. Sd.kfz 250/9
    7. Wespe Tank Destroyer
    8. Brummbär
    9. Sd.kfz 2 Kettenkrad
    10. Jagdpanzer IV/70
    11. Sd.kfz 302 Goliath tracked mine
    12. Zrinyi II (best Hungarian SPH)
    13. Panzer II Ausf J
    14. Sd.kfz 4/1 Panzerwerfer 15cm
    15. M4A4 Sherman
    16. Sd.kfz 251/9
    17. Panther Ausf A
    18. Ferdinand or Elefant idk
    19. StuH 42 or StuG III Ausf F
    20. SU-57 (yes is the same as the 35mm American Halftrack)
    21. Tiger II (Henschel)
    22. Nashorn
    23. Hetzer (Jagpanzer 38t)
    24. Jagdtiger
    25. Jagdpanther
    26. STURMMORSER (Sturmtiger 38cm very big rocket)
    27. StuG III Ausf. G
    28. M4A1E8
    29. Studebaker US6 (the russian also made their own version)
    30. M17 MGMC (during ww2 america gave all the allies a M3 AA)
    31. Chi-Ha-Kai
    32. Ha-Go (theres 3 i believe)
    33. Ka-Mi
    34. idk whats that in the back
    35. le Humvee
    36. Saxon APC
    37. another Humvee
    38. South African Armoured Car (i can't identify it)
    39. MineWolf Mine-clearance
    40. AMX-10rc
    41. luftvärnskanonvagn 90 (I think)
    42. M113 (idk which version)
    43. Maxxpro MRAP
    44. a Ukrainian Armoured Vehicle
    45. I aint gonna count these vehicles
    46. BTR-4 Ukraine
    That's all and I'm not going to count the boats and also please correct some of the vehicles if I am wrong 🗿

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      legend

    • @NucelarAss
      @NucelarAss 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      good job@@Wild-Siberia

    • @petros311
      @petros311 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      the M-113 version its the Dutch YPR-765 version

    • @mazzee531
      @mazzee531 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The swedish tank is a stridsfordon 9040, the luftvärnskanonvagn has a radar on the roof

    • @demonbox666
      @demonbox666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      38 is Mamba APC.

  • @CD-pm9kc
    @CD-pm9kc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    American lend lease.

  • @user-dw1op3cb6b
    @user-dw1op3cb6b 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    В коллекции не хватает Абрамса.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      you know, it will probably be there in a few months along with some leopards. Thanks for watching this video please share with your friends.

    • @Dr.Kermit403
      @Dr.Kermit403 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Wild-Siberia Какой-то Леопард вроде забрали на изучение. Остальные уничтожаются или повреждаются в ходе операции.
      Я где-то прочитал, что Абрамсы есть у ВСУ, но их держат в резерве и их боятся применять

    • @user-dw1op3cb6b
      @user-dw1op3cb6b 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Dr.Kermit403 Я жду когда их применят этой осенью. 90 тонн по осенней распутица - это просто подводная лодка в степях Украины. Ждем-с.

    • @Dr.Kermit403
      @Dr.Kermit403 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@user-dw1op3cb6b скорее уже зимой. Вот этт будет весело :)

    • @user-uh9vn6ck6q
      @user-uh9vn6ck6q 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ещё не вечер.Глава Пентагона уже предупредил,что не надо русским охотиться за Абрамсами,как за Леопардами,типа это нечестно.
      Думаю после такого предупреждения наши ребята обязательно поохотятся и доставят парочку Абрамсов в этот музей.

  • @sevasthvostanski5588
    @sevasthvostanski5588 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    if the Serbs managed to destroy the most modern western planes in 1999 with ancient anti-aircraft defense systems, just imagine what the Russians are doing to them. what did they call those weapons, game changers? what are those Russian automatic shovels doing to the "superior western armament"

    • @arthurgrande468
      @arthurgrande468 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same can be said to russian military equipments

    • @sevasthvostanski5588
      @sevasthvostanski5588 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@arthurgrande468 wait, Turkish drones Barjaktar, various howitzers, the best tanks on the planet, if not in the galaxy, Leopard, Challenger, Abrams, then Himars and scattered long-range missiles, the Russians with shovels in 10 days in October occupied more territories than NATO in the throughout the summer "counter-offensive"

    • @LuiseSky
      @LuiseSky 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sevasthvostanski5588 прежде, чем говорить про 10 дней, стоит наверное вспомнить количество жестов доброй воли и потерянного флота. И это-то при Арматах, Коалициях и прочих Бумерангах.

    • @sevasthvostanski5588
      @sevasthvostanski5588 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I sincerely feel sorry for the Ukrainians, but I do not understand the gullibility of the Ukraine. Western world which hates the Slavic peoples with such a passion that it is incomprehensible to me. Feudalism, slavery, communism, Marxism, imperialism, globalism, billions of people killed and enslaved, only in the last 250 years, these are the achievements of the so-called Western civilization

    • @arostwocents
      @arostwocents 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@LuiseSkyboasting about destroying a ship while losing thousands of men and having lost territory since the start of greatest counter offensive is the sign of a loser. Ukraine needs to overthrow the genocidal zelensky and demand he stops sending them to their deaths. See recent statements from many ukraine front line brigades about the true situation at the front. Zelensky is a madman. 'Not one step back' to a more defensible line, all officers and generals flee but he pours in men to bakhmut v2. If you are Ukrainian you owe it to your countrymen who still live to do everything you can to stop zelensky right now. March on Kiev and refuse to leave maidan square

  • @powertechnical
    @powertechnical 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The South African vehicle is the Mamba APC with the V-shape hull, designed to protect you from land mines. The USA uses the RG-31 which is based on this design.

  • @pallebudde4878
    @pallebudde4878 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Funny this guys dont know shit about the lend lease ... xD fail

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Refer to the pinned comment

  • @viduranimalarathne8797
    @viduranimalarathne8797 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    Thanks a lot for doing this video for us. It couldn't have been easy going through all that after what you've been through during your service. I was close to a suicide bombing during my childhood back in Sri Lanka. Decades later, i still can't take sounds of explosions or gunfire without my brain giving up on me and going blank.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      thank you for being kind and respectful. Thanks for taking the time to watch the video and commenting.

    • @JustChill-zd4ib
      @JustChill-zd4ib 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I can give you one advice: don't be a pussy.

  • @ernstwiltmann6
    @ernstwiltmann6 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    That was an excellent tour, to one of the best War Museums of the world. I watch ALL your videos. Greetings from Canada.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thank you so much for watching all the way from Canada my brother. I appreciate your support. You know this I have a good morning.

  • @javiermartinezjr8849
    @javiermartinezjr8849 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ty for your service carnal

  • @stylos951
    @stylos951 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    25:27 Not a tank but that mistake is made quite often, it's a Swedisch IFV CV9040B with a 40mm Bofors cannon.

  • @larrymiller465
    @larrymiller465 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Very interesting tour, thanks!!!

  • @brianmarshall1762
    @brianmarshall1762 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Winston Churchill stated that “perfection is the enemy of progress.” The Sherman tank and Russian weapons in general were not as good as the German ones, but shear weight of production won the war for the Allies. The Germans spent so long refining the Tiger tank, it delayed its arrival on the battlefield by months. Thank you for showing us the tour.

    • @crumpetcommandos779
      @crumpetcommandos779 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      tbf allied equipment was usually much better in the "soft factors" and not on paper. for instance shermans and even cromwells were way more reliable then german equivalents.

  • @ragincajun2446
    @ragincajun2446 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    thats it. I though Russia was stronger yet they're incompetent as hell.

  • @bruiser995
    @bruiser995 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video!

  • @eioclementi1355
    @eioclementi1355 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I wouldn't mind a shot of coffee from the tank café...awesome video one of the best on your channel !

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thank you so much for being so supportive. Ksenia liked the coffee.

  • @jaroslavpalecek4513
    @jaroslavpalecek4513 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Greetings from Czech republic Dan! Thank you for the video I am very thrilled. I will share the video with my brother and my friends. And right now I am reading the book about a famous Stalingrad battle. Its in English the authors are David M. Glantz and Jonathan M. House. I fully recommend that book. It has much praise and many, many positive reviewes. Have a great day. Jerry.

    • @Wild-Siberia
      @Wild-Siberia  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      greetings to the Czech Republic it’s always amazing to see your comments from so far away. I am humbled by your support to the channel thank you so much by the way this recommendation of the book. If you have Telegram, please do write it there so I have it stored.

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Why don't you read Russian authors about Stalingrad battle which are usually more precise and have more access to real documents and facts and ability to talk with veterans of the battle of both sides, while western authors are mostly repeat same pro-german anti-russian chiches?

    • @neilgromov6473
      @neilgromov6473 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Мира и уважения, вам и вашим близким в Чехии!

    • @jaroslavpalecek4513
      @jaroslavpalecek4513 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AlexanderTch Glantz used heavily work of Russian historian Isaev as a source. The book is recommend by TIK History who made a most detailed documentary on the battle. He made not only documentary about Stalingrad battle but also about operation Crusader and Market Garden among others. TIK also highly recommendes Isaev.
      th-cam.com/video/dUtPCPDO1L4/w-d-xo.htmlsi=JNWvATXAP_SQ9I2a

    • @alerausm
      @alerausm 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Привет из Сталинграда. Да, чехи очень постарались, чтобы у немцев была хорошая бронетехника. В том числе и под Сталинградом. Братушки 🙈

  • @PK-lk5gs
    @PK-lk5gs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well, come to think of it, King tiger is not all that great as far as "quality". Long 88mm cannon had great armor piercing capabilities, that is true, its thick and sloped armor was really superior to that of Tiger I, suspension reportedly provided a really smooth and comfortable ride for the crew, but that's about it as far as superiority goes.
    1) The tank ended up being very heavy - so prone to being stuck in swamps and loose grounds, and not every bridge could carry it structurally and dimensionally. It was also a challenge to evacuate the damaged tank from the battlefield as it required massive amounts of towing power to get one moving. And if suspension was damaged by a mine, good luck repairing it on the field with it's two-track rollers.
    2) It ended up being severely underpowered - the Tiger I and Panther both used the same V12 engine with ~500kw while being 15-25 tons lighter. Not only this means poor combat mobility, this also means that engine constantly worked under higher load and therefore required more frequent service and rebuilds, better cooling (so more fragile radiator area) and had higher fuel consumption per km of operation.
    3) The engine was gasoline-fuelled, not diesel, therefore it was more thermally loaded and was easier to set alight. Specific fuel consumption (litre/kw) was also higher compared to diesels, which definitely had an impact on the German war efforts and economy in general, because economy suffered from low oil supply.
    4) Turret had to cope with the massive cannon weight and recoil, so training of the turret was a challenge and was rather slow because of its sheer mass and momentum of that long high-caliber cannon.
    5) Because of the mass of the tank, its transmission was constantly strained and was prone to breakdowns, which increased downtime, requirement for spares and competent repair personnel.
    6) Because of the length and width of the tank compared to the width of railroad cars on euro gauge, logistics required narrow "highway" tracks to be fitted in order to transport the tank via railroad. Upon arrival it was required to fit wide "off-road" tracks before going into operations - which was not really a field exercise and required field repair facilities with all the associated logistics and touble.
    7) By the time Germans started to field this tank, the supply of the Nickel and other alloying metals was in decline, and it was well-known that King tigers' as well as late-year panthers' armor alloys were not really up to spec.
    So in the end you don't need a tank that looks impressive - by the time of its appearance no one was really intimidated by its looks. It was not a competition of quality vs. quantity at that point, it was (and to this day still is) whether the hardware does what it's supposed to do from tactical and operational standpoint - whether it really suits the conditions on the battlefield and is sustainable by existing logistics and supplies. KT was not good for the battlefield because of its mass, low mobility, and fragile transmission, and it was a logistical nightmare because of its size, complexity, fuel and maintenance requirements.

  • @boubacardiallo5593
    @boubacardiallo5593 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for explaination