Thus is very helpful for Specialist Mathematics in Australia. Almost half a semester is devoted to integration techniques. Our teacher also just found out about the DI method and he says it's amazing
I have now created a "math for fun" playlist for this one. I just want to at least learn calc 2, a class I never took. Integration seems like a lot more interesting a challenge than differentiation. The other thing I'm looking for is hints (but not full answers) on how to derive the derivative rules. I can derive the power rule and some trig rules, and I can use the chain rule + product rule to get the quotient rule (and vice versa), but I've never been able to derive the chain rule, product rule, or quotient rule without using the others.
I'm wondering - is there some sort of typographical innuendo that you're somehow reading into the parenthesis and the minus sign? If it is, I don't think it's anything many people would ever have noticed, if you hadn't kept drawing attention to it. Best wishes.
![ละลาย (LALALYE) - DAOU PITTAYA ต้าห์อู๋ พิทยา [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wo6r9TgausI/mqdefault.jpg)
Calculus 2 integration technique tutorial: th-cam.com/play/PLb2SZv7eAqpkMuBCzycoFTToqr-Miuxmy.html
Thus is very helpful for Specialist Mathematics in Australia. Almost half a semester is devoted to integration techniques. Our teacher also just found out about the DI method and he says it's amazing
Hi bprp! Please keep uploading such videos. Love the content and looking forward to future videos. 😊😊😊
Here's another: th-cam.com/video/M5MaGUO0JDs/w-d-xo.html
I really love your videos and always benefit from them, keep going and good luck
I have now created a "math for fun" playlist for this one. I just want to at least learn calc 2, a class I never took. Integration seems like a lot more interesting a challenge than differentiation.
The other thing I'm looking for is hints (but not full answers) on how to derive the derivative rules. I can derive the power rule and some trig rules, and I can use the chain rule + product rule to get the quotient rule (and vice versa), but I've never been able to derive the chain rule, product rule, or quotient rule without using the others.
For #5, could you use hyperbolic trig?
You forgot to put the link to Q13 in the description. Thank you.
I would used u-sub for the first first (x=sin(u)) and than DI.
I'm wondering - is there some sort of typographical innuendo that you're somehow reading into the parenthesis and the minus sign? If it is, I don't think it's anything many people would ever have noticed, if you hadn't kept drawing attention to it. Best wishes.
New here, why do you hold the PokeBall?
Great video, thank you!
That's the microphone.
15:17 are you sure? I think is should be -2/x because the power of x will completely comes not the new power . Aren't it?
It should be -1/x. When we do integrals, we divide by the new power after we add the one.
I know 0% about calculus but still watch his videos although I don’t understand anything.😂
Cool Man
I could solve the 13 questions in 17 minutes. Do you think that time is good or do I need more improvement in my speed.
You need to improve your speed: slow down.
22:57 epic zoom
😂