1:26 It does work, as the standard library is linked to everything you compile by default. It will give you a warning, as the compiler doesn't know how printf is declared, but it will still compile and work as intended.
not true, it will only "work" if you compile it with the header first and try to compile it without you just run the preexisting compiled executable so that may give you that idea. it will never truly work when you use printf without a header.
@@jirafey_ It does. I don't know what version of gcc you're using, but as of gcc 11.4.0 there is no problem with doing this. If you still don't believe me, try it. Edit: Apparently this also works with versions as early as 8.3.0, meaning that even if you didn't update your gcc in a while it would still work. Again, I encourage you to try it out before commenting about what I did or didn't do wrong. Compiler warnings don't mean there has been an issue during the compilation phase, it just means that you're doing something odd which you most likely didn't intend to.
I've always wondered how exactly headers do stuff. I hope you're making a playlist "without Headers" or something, as I find it really useful. Keep the good work! As a side note, other people have commented about how small the font size is. I think it would be better if you zoom in the text.
Thank you and everyone else for the feedback. I will try to re-upload the video and make it more readable. Definitely will do that for more videos. I am thinking of doing a few "without headers" stuff when I have time, so look forward to that.
![เป็นไปได้ไหม - WanMai [Teaser] | 05-12-24](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P5Uto6e453w/mqdefault.jpg)
You should make your font size 4x bigger or more. Also, I'm not sure the register keyword matters anymore.
Ya, I can barely read it, like he wants to torture us, lol.
The guy has ultra mega hyper wide monitor
1:26 It does work, as the standard library is linked to everything you compile by default. It will give you a warning, as the compiler doesn't know how printf is declared, but it will still compile and work as intended.
not true, it will only "work" if you compile it with the header first and try to compile it without you just run the preexisting compiled executable so that may give you that idea. it will never truly work when you use printf without a header.
@@jirafey_ It does. I don't know what version of gcc you're using, but as of gcc 11.4.0 there is no problem with doing this. If you still don't believe me, try it.
Edit: Apparently this also works with versions as early as 8.3.0, meaning that even if you didn't update your gcc in a while it would still work. Again, I encourage you to try it out before commenting about what I did or didn't do wrong.
Compiler warnings don't mean there has been an issue during the compilation phase, it just means that you're doing something odd which you most likely didn't intend to.
Good thing!
Bro is this a video for ants?
Love the subject matter, but, to echo the other commenters, it's WAY too hard to read.
I mean, if you do it with assembly, why don't you use assembly?
I've always wondered how exactly headers do stuff. I hope you're making a playlist "without Headers" or something, as I find it really useful. Keep the good work!
As a side note, other people have commented about how small the font size is. I think it would be better if you zoom in the text.
Thank you and everyone else for the feedback. I will try to re-upload the video and make it more readable. Definitely will do that for more videos.
I am thinking of doing a few "without headers" stuff when I have time, so look forward to that.
You want to teach yourself with 😂😂😂
Nothing we can see what you typed in
I can see =D
you should either code in an ide or invest your time and learn vim, nano is just cursed