Replace Windows File Explorer With Something Better

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 786

  • @switch1e
    @switch1e 2 ปีที่แล้ว +178

    I’m a video editor and the tab groups look life changing. I’m getting this ASAP!

    • @nikkehtine
      @nikkehtine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      WHY DO I RANDOMLY COME ACROSS YOU IN RANDOM PLACES SO MUCH

    • @stonespider
      @stonespider ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@nikkehtine maybe you were a stalker in your previous life 🤔

  • @glock21guy
    @glock21guy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wow. That brings back some memories. I've been a Linux admin/user for about 25 years now (where I have almost all of the DOpus functionality you showcase here, under KDE/Plasma and Dolphin), but I used to write DOpus scripts in my Amiga days in the early 90's.

    • @schneensch
      @schneensch ปีที่แล้ว

      Dolphin is extremely powerful. Really, almost any Linux file manager is as powerful as this one. It's just that Windows Explorer completely sucks.

  • @drewcification
    @drewcification 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    A Good free one is Files as well, a more modern prettier version of the default explorer with more features like tabs

    • @middle_pickup
      @middle_pickup 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Been using files for a little while. It's okay. Not as customized as this, but fun to look at.

    • @dirtyflbreaks825
      @dirtyflbreaks825 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the tip! Testing it now and it looks like a nice upgrade to Explorer. Not very customizable but has most of what I need.

    • @blueberrycmd
      @blueberrycmd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I expected this video to be of files

    • @Necr0MncR-YT
      @Necr0MncR-YT ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't know why but it's paid for me 😢

    • @synen
      @synen ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Files is slow as balls.
      Best ones are Total Commander and Directory Opus.

  • @ConnerRhoads
    @ConnerRhoads 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    XYplorer has been my go to for a long time now. I don't think the UI is quiet as clean as what you were showcasing, but its background mechanics such as copy are REALLY strong. I'm gonna give your program a shot though. While I really like XYplorer, your demo of Directory Optius feels more modern.

    • @harshnemesis
      @harshnemesis 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dopus has great file moving/copying mechanics too.. it even lets you schedule operations, rather than run them simultaneously. If it that doesn't do it for you, there's actually a built in script that let's you use teracopy on the power user bar.

    • @kurts3779
      @kurts3779 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      XYplorer is better in my opinion.

  • @davidmccarthy6390
    @davidmccarthy6390 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Us old Amiga users are well aquainted with Directory Opus. Good to see a version for the PC, downloading it now.

  • @peterpanino2436
    @peterpanino2436 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am using DOpus for many years now. I agree: It's the REAL THING!

  • @nordin_gh
    @nordin_gh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use Total Commander since 90s. Even I put a copy into flashdrive so I can use with any PC.

  • @freezinfire
    @freezinfire 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    definitely one of the coolest videos

  • @kerodfresenbetgebremedhin1881
    @kerodfresenbetgebremedhin1881 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is a god send

  • @_SJ
    @_SJ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Ctrl + Shift + T is ❤️ I learned it on your Dec. 5, 2019 video (20 Keyboard Shortcuts You're A Moron for Not Using). It's my life saver at work ever since.

    • @wariolandgoldpiramid
      @wariolandgoldpiramid 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ctrl + Shift + T is amazing.

    • @RoseQuartz692
      @RoseQuartz692 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @UCQ3iOl_nW_OmLon-XFe4zHQ I have not heard about Windows Power Tools before and I always using Ctrl + Shift + T

    • @kartiklakhotia3861
      @kartiklakhotia3861 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How is that possible that your comment is 2hr ago and video 2min ago??

    • @ZIA9421
      @ZIA9421 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To my earlier reply
      I can't see it to edit it
      But misread ctrl + shit +t
      For win+ shit +t
      Sorry

    • @_SJ
      @_SJ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kartiklakhotia3861 Channel Membership

  • @MichaelStrother
    @MichaelStrother 2 ปีที่แล้ว +139

    This was great. I've been using Directory Opus for years, and while I knew I wasn't scratching the surface on how I could utilize it, this has opened my eyes to new possibilities with real-world examples.

    • @russell2952
      @russell2952 ปีที่แล้ว

      Opus is great. Been using it for years too.

  • @oglothenerd
    @oglothenerd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    * Linux user watching *

    • @Really_purple
      @Really_purple 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      *MacBuntu user watching* (macos theme for ubuntu)

    • @oglothenerd
      @oglothenerd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Really_purple Lol.

    • @starfieldgames5976
      @starfieldgames5976 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      have fun spending hours finding missing files and installing compatibility software just to get any linux distro anywhere near an actual working OS

    • @Really_purple
      @Really_purple 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@starfieldgames5976 Its very clear u never used ubuntu

    • @Really_purple
      @Really_purple 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@starfieldgames5976 it took me like an hour to install and set everything up

  • @vgamesx1
    @vgamesx1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    This is what the built-in file explorer should have been like 10 years ago, would it really be that much work for a multi-billion dollar company to add stuff like tabs and a dual-view?

  • @_SJ
    @_SJ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +155

    10:01 - 10:04 - I like it everytime you do this. Connecting with your audience after a long presentation 👍🏻

    • @kerodfresenbetgebremedhin1881
      @kerodfresenbetgebremedhin1881 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      lol

    • @DaMusicBoi
      @DaMusicBoi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kerodfresenbetgebremedhin1881 yeah LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT LOL TROLL BOT

    • @MartinVoorsmit
      @MartinVoorsmit 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Pragmatism'001 Good Question - I like to know too...!

    • @hwdrlkh
      @hwdrlkh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Pragmatism'001 Joe has not replied or it was a spammer and TH-cam deleted it

  • @GeorgiosXenakis
    @GeorgiosXenakis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Directory opus was the best file manager on the Amiga era ❤
    For norton commander lovers there is also the total commander which is my personal choice for windows os.

    • @XennialGeek
      @XennialGeek 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I am a Total Commander users for 27 years now. Best money I have ever spent.

    • @sterling_max
      @sterling_max 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@XennialGeek same here

    • @chezchezchezchez
      @chezchezchezchez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@XennialGeek I PAID for Total Commander too! Love it! And they KEEP updating it.

    • @TerryMundy
      @TerryMundy ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Georgios Xenakis YES! Amiga Opus. Very tightly written program.

    • @harshnemesis
      @harshnemesis ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Total commander doesn't hold a candle to dopus which is far better than it ever was on amiga. Amiga sucked so it failed and Windows won.

  • @michaelsteinbach
    @michaelsteinbach 2 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    Maybe customize the "Get Sizes" function to always list folder sizes, but if it takes longer that 5 or 10 seconds, leave it blank unless you call the function.

    • @mike406
      @mike406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Not really possible because you can’t know how long it would take unless you actually perform the process, but then you’re still tying up resources to calculate that.
      You could instead maybe calculate how many files and sub folders are inside with a quick recursive function but the threshold for what is “too many” would vary by hardware and how fast the CPU and drives are. However even this is not perfect because 10 really large files can take longer to calculate than 100 really small ones depending on fragmentation and other factors.
      Honestly there are just more purpose built tools for doing this like WinDirStat or WizTree for calculating directory structure sizes.

    • @middle_pickup
      @middle_pickup 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This.

    • @kebrus
      @kebrus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I'm not sure if its actually not a good idea, you should try to prevent your disk from needlessly reads.

    • @middle_pickup
      @middle_pickup 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kebrus What's the harm in reading data? Isn't that only going to help with finding hidden errors on a drive?

    • @Aidan6475
      @Aidan6475 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kebrus to get file size you don't need to read whole file.

  • @chairwood
    @chairwood 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    when I'm having trouble finding something on my computer I use a program called "Everything." it's never let me down

  • @GYTCommnts
    @GYTCommnts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +169

    Total Commander deserves praise too, I think. Very powerful. And for nostalgia: Far Manager. An open source Norton Commander clone for modern systems. I've been using others for specific functions, but I always have the classic Windows File Manager at hand, because handling certain type of folders could lead to errors. But other times is the Windows FM that end in errors. Other thing to consider alternative tools for copying files, like was the old but gold "Ultracopier", that gave you control of the file operations speed and other very useful settings that should be in Windows as "advanced settings", that nowadays seems like just a dream and the System is getting dumber and less customizable.

    • @UltimatePerfection
      @UltimatePerfection 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Total Commander expects you to buy it, just like WinRAR. And IMO Midnight Commander is better than Far.

    • @mda5003
      @mda5003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@UltimatePerfection You can still use Total Commander for free but you have to choose a button every time you open the program.

    • @UltimatePerfection
      @UltimatePerfection 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mda5003 As I've said, just like WinRAR.

    • @harshnemesis
      @harshnemesis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      total commander doesn't hold a candle to dopus yet they expect 37 eur before tax, so 50 eur meanwhile dopus pro is 58 eur and the lite version that still does much more than total commander is 32 eur, lol
      should cost 10 max, if they don't want us to keep pirating it to get rid of the annoying dialog.

    • @mda5003
      @mda5003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@harshnemesis Which is why I've not paid for Total Commander but use it all the time - much better than Windows File Explorer. Opus may well be superior but is too expensive IMO.

  • @zhotpotrecipe
    @zhotpotrecipe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    To be honest. It looks so bad.

  • @mrfoameruk
    @mrfoameruk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I've been using Total Commander, and even windows commander before that so must be at least 20 years. I use it daily and it does everything I want it to. I don't really know how to use Window's own system as I just use total commander all the time. Easy to use and does the job.
    I've tried a lot of the others like DOPUS but end up going back to total commander every time.

    • @MartinVoorsmit
      @MartinVoorsmit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haha yes.. we used Total Commander in MS-DOS era... 👴🏼 That was life changing back then... 🆕

    • @Cowb0yDan
      @Cowb0yDan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Total Commander is my go-to as well. The keybindings are pretty good too

  • @marciusnhasty
    @marciusnhasty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I've switched from only using Total Commander to using One Commander as well. Directory Opus just haven't convinced me on the value proposition side, I find it to be way to expensive because it's competition just isn't as expensive and some of it is straight up free.

  • @cl2nden1st89
    @cl2nden1st89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Director Opus is incredibly powerful. Some of my most favourite features are Rename and Search in combination with “regular expressions”. The built-in picture viewer can also work with colour management profiles. Oh, and you can customize your own colour schemes or create a whole new look. Work with database and archive collection with 3rd party plugins… Possibilities are almost endless. BTW, the extremely detailed Help documentation is also invaluable.

  • @bejarano1960
    @bejarano1960 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Directory Opus is great but Total Commander (originally Windows Commander) is equally good in many ways. I've been using it for decades and can't imagine using Windows without it.

    • @dkostasx
      @dkostasx หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is also a Double Commander which is very similar to Total Commander, but is free and have some extra good features

  • @cbaten2
    @cbaten2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Total Commander is my (windows) choice, speciifcally dealing with large folders with project files or measrment data without losing oversight or control. And because of decennia long muscle memory ;). The duo window is a must for me with efficient conmparison and synching. Automatic background synching is to unreliable and slow.

  • @joaquindiaz678
    @joaquindiaz678 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have been using Total Commander since I was introduced in the world of computers when I was around 3 years old. I am very used to it. I use the free version, I have no intentions of paying it because it has everything I need. I use Total Commander in my Android phone, and when I use Linux, I install a very similar app (even I think it is a clone) called Double Commander

  • @MartinVoorsmit
    @MartinVoorsmit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    For a quick File Search I use 'Everything' so much faster than normal File Explorer. I hope this DOPUS is as fast... I also use QTabbar. Would be great to have all-in-one solution..!

  • @Jmcgee1125
    @Jmcgee1125 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The breaking point in the Windows file explorer for me wasn't the layout hitches, nor the fact that flac/ogg files brought it to a screeching halt (half a minute for 5 items, on a gen 4 NVMe SSD), it was when it started to completely freeze because it could not properly parse the thumbnails on video files (requiring manually deleting administrator-protected cache files and rebooting). How does Microsoft do it?
    This looks pretty good, I'll check it out.

    • @flameofthephoenix8395
      @flameofthephoenix8395 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My biggest problem with File explorer was that one update that introduced a buggy memory leak that for most people could be resolved simply by restarting the computer, but my laptop being incredibly old was affected differently, the memory leak was permanent and after a week or two broke the laptop entirely.

  • @mda5003
    @mda5003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've been using Total Commander for years even before it changed it's name from Windows Commander - apparently Microsoft pointed out that 'Windows' was their trademark.

  • @senritsujumpsuit6021
    @senritsujumpsuit6021 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Free-commander is my go too it has dual sides each with infinite tabs to add that you can drag an drop through on the fly as well haha along with being open source baby woooo thats what I have been waiting for

  • @mikaellyssarides5977
    @mikaellyssarides5977 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What do you think about Total Commander, I've been using it for at least 20 years.
    I like the double windows display for moving files around.

  • @smft9147
    @smft9147 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Bro I’ve been watching you for almost 7 years and I have learned so much. I haven’t even seen this video but I know I’m gonna use directory opus now lol

  • @nkumar8079
    @nkumar8079 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Total Commander since forever I can remember. Just like a few others, loved the 2 panes layout of NC from DOS days and found total commander (windows commander then) and have never moved away from it. It's the philospohy of the 2 panes - source and target that is the attraction and full marks to Norton for that. All that is ready in Total Commander and there is no need to customize to make it look like that - also while Directory Opus may be giving more control, it's also is making it complicated and the customizations makes commands appear all over the place in it's layout. Maybe, its appealing to people used to the windows file explorer and yes, in comparison to file explorer it's definitely better but finesse of Total Commander is a class apart. The plugins only add to its already great functionality.

  • @michealhall4512
    @michealhall4512 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    DirectoryOpus is the first piece of software I install on any new Windows machine. I absolutely hate dealing with Windows installs that don't have it.
    When family asks for help with a computer, I insist they install it if they want me to do anything for them. (Mostly I buy them a license for my own sanity)
    I've been using dOpus for over 30 years, since the Amiga 2000! (I can't believe I'm typing that ...)
    It's a bad joke how little, in time measured in *decades*, MS has improved Explorer.

  • @kirsten1992
    @kirsten1992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I use total commander, never touch windows explorer, using TC since my first PC, 10 years

  • @ChromiaCat
    @ChromiaCat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thanks Thio, I'll keep this in mind if I get annoyed with the default file explorer in the future. Also, one tool I can recommend if someone wants tabs in the vanilla file explorer is QTTabBar

    • @Lebon19
      @Lebon19 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's what I've been using for a very long time now. The issue I have with it is that it *slurrrrrrrrrrps* RAM like crazy. You can see explorer.exe take several hundred MB of RAM casually with QTTabBar.
      To be honest, I had been using it mostly for the tabs. I know there's a ton more it can do. Something I wish I could do, clean up the left pane, that it can't. Looks like Directory Opus can, however. Well, that's because it's a different app altogether and not an extension like QTTabBar.

  • @agr00m
    @agr00m 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Has probably been mentioned already, but QTTabBar has most of the same features and is free. My only complaint is the split window is crap, though I have not tried the latest 2048 release. I also used Ultra Explorer for years, and still do on occasion. The split window is much better, but has been out of development for several years, so the UI is somewhat dated. I especially like the filename formatting for different extensions.

    • @Cyba_IT
      @Cyba_IT ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yup, QTTabBar is great. It just adds features to Windows File Explorer for free. That way you don't have to worry about setting default file managers or have any compatibility issues. I just use it for tabs.

    • @3lH4ck3rC0mf0r7
      @3lH4ck3rC0mf0r7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Huh. Neat. I left that project for dead nearly a decade ago. Nice to see it back in development, and there's even a fork!

    • @anpesx
      @anpesx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Qt apps suck. All of them. If it was made using Qt, i run away

  • @JohnnyMegabyteCanada
    @JohnnyMegabyteCanada 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've been using Q-DIR for 10+ years (the Quad Explorer)

  • @arg0333
    @arg0333 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I've been using Directory Opus since 2004 and I love it. The customization is insane! I've customized Opus by quite a bit, but even after all this time, I have barely scratched the surface of this file manager's capabilities. I enjoy using the synchronization feature that allows me to easily backup files to my backup drives.

  • @CZghost
    @CZghost ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Well, I'm using Total Commander, which frankly is free to use. All you need to do is just click a correct button to keep it opened (it tells you which one it is). Yes, it asks for registration, which does cost money. But you don't have to, unless you're using it on behalf of a bussiness.

    • @dkostasx
      @dkostasx หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or you can use just as good alternative called Double Commander which is free for personal and also for commercial use. I used Total Commander before, but then I could not use it on my work PC, so switched to Double Commander and never looked back. It even has some nice features not available in Total Commander

  • @Shajirr_
    @Shajirr_ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not speaking about Opus, but about almost all other replacements - for some reason they think its acceptable to downgrade the functionality of File Explorer, instead of improving it.
    Most replacements I've tried failed an extremely simple test - picking a file/folder and dragging it to a favourites bar. Almost none could do it, and some didn't even have any form of vertical favourites bar at all.
    "Files 2.0" which is often mentioned in Reddit posts can't do it, that is besides it being unimaginably slow.

  • @stuartgibson9755
    @stuartgibson9755 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Directory Opus is the KING of file managers. I've been using it for 33 years, since it was written for the Commodore Amiga in 1990. Yes, it's expensive, but you get what you pay for.

  • @willa4you
    @willa4you ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You know what would be a nice improvement? Moving to trash a file when you accidentaly overwrite it. It occures to me from time to time that I drag and drop into a folder a file which has the same name of another already in it, and I confirm the overwriting without thinking (because often it is the straightforward thing to do), just soon realizing I actually needed that file too!

  • @ruudygh
    @ruudygh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can i make shortcut key to copy a file/folder's path?
    Im using QTTabbar currently and this feature is the most useful for me.

  • @Mike0193Azul
    @Mike0193Azul 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This is game changing 💚🔥 Finally after so many years being frustrated with the buggy and inefficient Windows Explorer! On Windows 11 Windows Explorer can’t even remember the opened windows/tabs from last time the pc was on. And though it would remember them in Windows 10, it would often crash. Plus anytime I copy a file to another window such as cloud storage, my original window panel automatically resets to the top, which is super aggravating when working with thousands of photos. Plus, the “extra large” thumbnails are not big enough. Being able to see the sizes automatically is amazing too. This app is must buy

  • @briankgarland
    @briankgarland 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I love the .bak script. But I'd like to see it modified so that .bak* files get created in or moved to a designated backup folder so that you don't have to move them after the fact.

  • @TheDoctorFlay
    @TheDoctorFlay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I use Total Commander because of how compact it is and has lots of useful plugins.

    • @AyoKeito
      @AyoKeito 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The problem with TC is that it can't group files. At least for extended attributes such as video resolution or framerate. Or maybe at all, i can't remember.

    • @TheDoctorFlay
      @TheDoctorFlay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AyoKeito It does group by the column you click on such as extension. Haven't tried adding any custom ones, but I think your experience was too long ago.
      Mostly I use it for SFTP, various cloud drive services and as a front end for android ADB.

    • @AyoKeito
      @AyoKeito 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheDoctorFlay around 2 years ago

  • @Underskore
    @Underskore 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My problem with most of the l Explorer replacements is they look like they are right out of windows xp and not 10

  • @Bakin
    @Bakin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have been using Directory Opus for many years in its standard form without editing the program but have found even in that form it has many features that is far superior to File Explorer.
    There is also a feature (Find File) that is a powerful searching tool that allows finding groups of files with the same attributes which is impossible with File Explorer. This feature allows using "wildcards", "case sensitive letters", "file dates", "file sizes" and many other attributes that you may want to search a group of files with. Great review.

    • @lordelliott42
      @lordelliott42 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The search function was better in older versions of Windows File Explorer. IIRC, the one with Windows XP let you search with wildcards, dates, and sizes, and it had a cute little dog!

    • @Bakin
      @Bakin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Looks like Microsoft has devolved File Explorer overtime.

    • @AyoKeito
      @AyoKeito 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You still can search for those. Just put something into the search bar and extended search options will pop up on top toolbar of explorer. From there you can add pretty much any criteria, and it's in fact only a text like "date:" added to the search bar, so when you learn them you can skip top toolbar.

  • @hirakchatterjee5240
    @hirakchatterjee5240 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The UI of this file xplorer looks like it's from windows 98 era. There are far prettier third party file explorers.

  • @影-銀
    @影-銀 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    should you be using an alternative windwos file explorer?

  • @vadrif-draco
    @vadrif-draco ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is awesome, but I wish you were exploring a free tool or its free features

  • @GavinSeim
    @GavinSeim ปีที่แล้ว

    Tried it, looked good, froze within 30 seconds. Oh well.

  • @jan_Sanku
    @jan_Sanku 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Don't get me wrong, this explorer is really fricking cool. And I get paid and closed software for stuff like the Adobe things. But for a file explorer you're meant to use all the time? I'm fine using the default, but any alternative better be FOSS.

  • @JohnSmith-xq1pz
    @JohnSmith-xq1pz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    To qoute a certain yellow and black book "The case of the broken window" only in this case it's Microsoft's incompetence that broke it...

  • @andrewcharlesmoss
    @andrewcharlesmoss ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why has File Explorer not functionally changed in 20 years? There is so much potential to do something with it - customised folder icons, batch renaming, tagging, version control, metadata, etc.

  • @RonakDhakan
    @RonakDhakan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Q-Dir and OneCommander are also nice free options [although no where near as many features as Opus]. Q-Dir has good functionality but dated user interface. OneCommander has new interface but lacks some basic functionality.

    • @RossNixon
      @RossNixon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Q-DIR is essential for me. I use the 'filter' feature often, so I just see filenames matching my wildcard patterns.

  • @jan-thoresolem5272
    @jan-thoresolem5272 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Downloaded Directory Opus, installed it, tried it for a few hours, then deleted it! Very promising funtionality, but the program is NOT aware of different DPI and/or resolutions in a multi-/dual-monitor setup. When running on my laptop main screen (high DPI using 200% scaling) it just looks lovely, crisp and sharp. Drag the Directory Opus windows over to the secondary monitor (lower DPI, different resolution, no scaling=100%) the window becomes fuzzy/blurry. All other programs (I use) does this excellently, so I did a bit of Google'ing on how to configure Directory Opus to automatically adjust to different monitors. Seems it can't, and from the forum posts I found, they blame Windows and "explains the problem away". Why can other vendors fix it, but not the authors of Directory Opus?

  • @badasahog
    @badasahog 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    explorer.exe is more than just the file explorer, its the entire desktop and taskbar. There are programs out there that replace it entirely (although they're not very good imo)

    • @atlantictherapymadeira6874
      @atlantictherapymadeira6874 ปีที่แล้ว

      he´s talking about "Windows File Explorer" a part of explorer.exe, not the thing as a whole, try to keep it up.

    • @badasahog
      @badasahog ปีที่แล้ว

      @@atlantictherapymadeira6874 I wasn't correcting him, just pointing out if anyone was curious

    • @atlantictherapymadeira6874
      @atlantictherapymadeira6874 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@badasahog Apologies then, this is why people on the internet are always aggy .. when writing something the intonation is not passed on, next time try something like, "as a side note, explorer.exe", "by the way" or "not to mention".

  • @InterFelix
    @InterFelix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Okay, looks pretty good. But sorry, I'm not paying 60 bucks for a file explorer. That's just ridiculous, even if it's as advanced as Directory Opus seems to be. 20 bucks maybe. But 60 is just ridiculous.

  • @BoGy1980
    @BoGy1980 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WOW... two things i just wanted to say: As a DOS-era relic i'm also using an alternative "file explorer"; namely Total Commander (which resembles the "back-then-uber-filemanager NC.exe (aka norton commander)). It even uses the same operations on the Fn-keys as the original. F3 will always be view, F8 is delete and tons of other functions ofcourse. NC is cloned and copied on every operating system I know or have used.
    The second thing my eye struck is your driveletters... I dunno if you know it; but A: and B: are reserved letters for floppy drives... That's also the reason why the boot-harddrive (or ssd) gets the designation C: and not A:. The reason why there are two letters reserved for floppy drives is simple: back in the days we also had computers withouth a hard-drive, and to not swap floppies every time the system needed a systemfile or function; we kept the MS-Dos bootdisk in drive A: and run applications from drive B: That's also the reason why you see those "vintage" computers having two 5.25" floppy drives. Once harddrives came along computers began to be fitted with a single floppy drive as there was no need for two anymore. But if in a modern day computer you'd hook up two floppy drives on the floppy controller on the motherboard, i'll automatically give them driveletters A: and B: on a Microsoft OS... So it's actually NOT DONE to designate either of those letters to non-removable drives... I use A: for certain USB thumb-drives (if you do that, than only the ones u gave that specific letter will get it when reconnected, others will just keep getting the first free letter). As soon as you'd connect a floppydrive though, that driveletter will become locked to the floppy and you'll need to set a new driveletter for that usb-drive.
    So i hope you (and your viewers) will adopt the correct driveletters from now on, as you could run in big troubles when we all revert to magnetical storage in the form of 360KB/1.2MB 5.25" floppies or the 720KB/1.44MB 3.5" diskettes as main storageformat... (ofc that's a joke!)

  • @defacube
    @defacube ปีที่แล้ว +1

    one of the best features you added is the temporary escalate thingy. except I wont need it, cuz I don't have UAC enabled. (I know, it's dangerous, but atleast I know what I am doing)
    i'll still think about installing it
    edit: I installed it

  • @ThorsShadow
    @ThorsShadow ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As someone working in tech support, I honestly wish Microsoft would replace their explorer to something and name it as something else.
    Reason being:
    Me, on the phone, not seeing what customer is doing: "Can you open file explorer and look for folder X for me? Open file Y in that folder."
    Cusromer, after a way too short while: "OK, I'm on the internet now. What should I do again?"
    They open Internet Explorer. All the time. It's so frequent, that my colleagues and I have started to ask customers if they know what the windows explorer is.

    • @Eternal_Tech
      @Eternal_Tech ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Besides for asking the customer, there are a few ways to deal with this:
      1. Ask the customer if they see the icon with the yellow folder with the blue holder at the bottom of their screen (on the taskbar).
      2. Ask the customer to press Windows-E to open File Explorer.
      3. Ask the customer to click on the Start button and then type in "file explorer"
      4. Just have the customer download your remote support software from your Web site and run it, so you can do everything yourself. 😊

    • @ThorsShadow
      @ThorsShadow ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Eternal_Tech Thank you for the reply. :3
      We do most of these already. Although quite a number of customers don't know what the "windows key" on their keyboard is, some have trouble downloading our remote support tool (related: too many customers insist they are on the current version of our software, because they downloaded the setup file....but then didn't run the setup file).
      But yeah, with some combination of these things we usually get around to helping our customers.

  • @jefflolson
    @jefflolson ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for giving you your presets too helps us with a starting point. I notice the file is named Light? Do you also have a dark mode version?

  • @Neuer_Alias_erstellen
    @Neuer_Alias_erstellen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is there #SFTP integration / file sync over the network? - because MS Explorer only supports FTP

  • @anon_y_mousse
    @anon_y_mousse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Makes me happy to know that I'm not the only one that sorts files by modification time. I live in the terminal, so I've got a bunch of aliases for listing directory contents in different ways, but this looks so good I'm wondering if it would work through WINE.

  • @themusesquad8554
    @themusesquad8554 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've been using Windows commander since I was using Norton on my 386 dos PC back in the 90s

  • @NazmusLabs
    @NazmusLabs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Turn off title bar colors in settings to get a glass title bar in win11 22h2

  • @gglendinningok
    @gglendinningok 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Opus cannot handle basic video files, no sound on any, this is a basic function most others do automaticaly, so needs some work

  • @Kalphalus
    @Kalphalus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is cool! I might make a custom remake of win10 and 11 explorers with more features like editing zip files without extracting them.

  • @ajleeplayz
    @ajleeplayz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thio: now this software is not free
    Me: Adios

  • @jackfishthe6th373
    @jackfishthe6th373 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I use "Open Shell" file explorer because it was built into the operating system called "Ameliorated Windows 10" that I reconstructed myself. I recommend building that OS for yourself because it strips all of Windows 10 bloatware out, dramatically improves OS performance, and eliminates Microsoft's ability to track/collect your data. (Note you will have to download and resinstall your GPU driver)

    • @teknerd
      @teknerd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ameliorated Windows 10 looks interesting, especially on my older laptops that won't work with W11. How are future upgrades and security updates handled with Ameliorated Windows 10? I like to know before committing to clean installing it and then installing my applications. If Ameliorated Windows 10 is something that is reliable, I can see it breathing new life into my older Win10 pcs (2) and laptops (2). What's Microsoft's take on this?

    • @jackfishthe6th373
      @jackfishthe6th373 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@teknerd Unfortunately one of the major draw backs is making updates to the OS, if you want to update it you need to reinstall it, but to counter this issue you can do three things that cover most security vulnerabilities without the need for updates: (1) be careful what you download/install; (2) remove administrative privileges from the OS default user; and (3) install an antivirus (I use Avira). As for Microsoft's take, the distribution/download of an edited Windows 10 .iso file (that is not from Microsoft) breaks the law and could be considered piracy, but what is not illegal is recreating/editing your own version of the "Ameliorated Windows 10" from an already owned Windows 10 .iso file. The "Ameliorated Windows 10" website provides you with all of the information required to build the OS for yourself which is what I did.

    • @jackfishthe6th373
      @jackfishthe6th373 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also as a tip if you are worried about security or some software not working in the OS then use a normal version of Windows 10 inside a Virtual Machine (VM). That way you are still secure and can run anything on "Ameliorated Windows 10".

    • @teknerd
      @teknerd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@litLizard_ Have you had anything break with Chris' debloater tool? I tried leaner version of windows before and almost everytime I had something break like a new program that requires something that has been removed. Just asking. I am also a subscriber to Chris' channel.

    • @jackfishthe6th373
      @jackfishthe6th373 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@litLizard_ I have used ShutUp10++ and I like it as an alternative (the only concern is that it blocks only 99% of bloatware/spyware from running and doesn't actually remove the bloatware). To be honest "Ameliorated Windows 10" is only used by those who want the most extreme solution. Still ShutUp10++ is a really good option!

  • @chezchezchezchez
    @chezchezchezchez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dude, I PAID for Total Commander years ago too! Love it! And they KEEP updating it.
    Please review it.

  • @benjaminsmith3151
    @benjaminsmith3151 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is really surprising how bad "File explorer" tools are on nearly all systems. It REALLY shouldn't be this bad! This is the primary interface of the operating system, and the most basic use-cases are complete failures. Perhaps the name "Explorer" is perfect, as is "Search", because that's pretty much what you have to do. I'm not ready yet to purchase an alternative, because I'd like to think there is enough market demand to drive an open source project. I've made my own special purpose tools for my own research, but maybe it's time to look into this.

  • @TiredAndSleepDeprived
    @TiredAndSleepDeprived 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    can you extract files with it? because i cant figure out how to extract files with the default one

  • @MikeGalusha
    @MikeGalusha 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Explorer is so far behind the curve. I've been using XYPlorer for years, not free but the license allow use on any PC I own. Similar features and very customizable.

    • @jacksonmacd
      @jacksonmacd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Xyplorer can be overwhelming, especially with the pace of new features that are always being added. Don't get me wrong, I always download and review every update and try to use the new features as they are introduced.

    • @Grif_on96
      @Grif_on96 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      + for XYplorer . It has some minor shortcomings , but it's still good alternative to Directory Opus .

  • @techformsmaster930
    @techformsmaster930 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    in Microsofts (undeserving) defense, file explorer is far better (and stronger) than finder

  • @Mik_S
    @Mik_S 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have been using Directory Opus for over 20 years ever since it was on the Amiga, and is one of the few programs I am happy to actually pay for. I cannot live without it, windows explorer is unusable for me now.

  • @johnsmith1474
    @johnsmith1474 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nothing this kid points out is particularly useful and it clutters the program.

  • @JohnCran
    @JohnCran 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've been using FreeCommander for years and I love it. But that's mainly because the thing I do most with files is move/copy from one place to another and the split panes makes it very easy.

    • @SalivatingSteve
      @SalivatingSteve 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      FreeCommander FTW! I use it because Windows Explorer is super slow with changing sort by.

  • @EYECONIC3969
    @EYECONIC3969 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    bruhhhhh "files" app is much better it is available on microsoft store do try

  • @rikutalvio
    @rikutalvio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've been using Xplorer2 for years - big fan of the dual pane view. Now it also has Miller columns which comes in handy with deep folder trees.

    • @kittle31
      @kittle31 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      +1 for Xyplorer. ive been using it for many years. The file tree pane where I can hide unwanted folders is what makes it worthwhile for me. Also not free. But you get what you pay for

    • @rikutalvio
      @rikutalvio 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@kittle31 Xplorer2, not Xyplorer.

    • @Grif_on96
      @Grif_on96 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@rikutalvio I'm switched from default explorers (on my win7 , win8 and win10 PCs) to XYplorer a few month ago . And it feels great . I still experimenting with endless toolbar instruments and whole app settings .
      But i curious about your choice . What do you think make Xplorer2 most suitable for you ? And what in your opinion make it unique (in comparing to XYplorer and Directory Opus) ?

    • @rikutalvio
      @rikutalvio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Grif_on96 I switched back in 2004 after a lot of testing with all the available alternatives; Xplorer2 felt the best and had everything I needed in the free lite version - have been happy with it ever since, and eventually bought the ultimate version to support the developer.
      Prompted by this video, I had a look at the top contenders, and even installed DO and XY to see what they're about. I'm sure their extensive customisation options will make them great, but the OOBE was so off-putting, I couldn't be bothered to test them very long.
      Most features are probably shared across the board. But do they have Miller columns?

  • @TheSimArchitect
    @TheSimArchitect 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great idea. Would be nicer if it were free open source. I wonder if it's faster than File Explorer when dealing with large folders that take forever to sort, as well as the index / search, or if it's just about extra features (you mention it's better but you didn't say if it includes the speed when dealing with hundreds of thousands of files) .

    • @fdmillion
      @fdmillion 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah I wish there was an open source equivalent. I'm a tech enthusiast and "per machine" licensing will never fit my use patterns. I own three desktops, four laptops and multiple other kinds of PCs (handheld, stick PC, etc) that I actively use regularly. I'm certainly not against paying for software but I can't reasonably commit to anything that is per-machine. I know I'm an outlier but that doesn't change the fact that it makes it hard for me to find paid programs that I can actually integrate into my workflows without paying way more than is reasonable for one user.
      This program is $89 for one PC and one laptop. I don't think there's any exceptions for multiple laptops. So that means I need a minimum of 4 licenses, and that's not counting the extra exotic PCs.

  • @Freddie_06
    @Freddie_06 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is there a script to re-open closed tabs wich were closed using mouse3?

  • @peterhelpme
    @peterhelpme 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I still have a Directory Opus Amiga floppy disk.

  • @arthurkallinen
    @arthurkallinen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If it wasn't so expensive for only one lisense (having basically 5 pc's at my use, 2 on basically daily usage), but seems really useful!

  • @MrFairhill
    @MrFairhill ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think I've been using Directory Opus for ten years now. What I love the most about it is the Content Folder Types. I work in radio and browse a lot of music folders. It's excellent to have the lister show me metadata about the music files by default, and not to mention have it have the lister layout stay consistent. One problem with the regular File Explorer is that in case one of the folders with music have a picture, it defaults to a thumbnail view. I also like the feature of having the folder sizes showing up on hover. Directory Opus is one of the few programs I always install and I also one of the first programs I bought a license for.

  • @laurendoe168
    @laurendoe168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What the Windows File Explorer always irritated me with is "Open With." While it's usually a right click option, for some reason it's not always. Even when it is, far too often the program I want to open the file with isn't listed. The rigmarole I have to go through in order to select my preference is a nightmare. Does Directory Opus address this issue??

  • @secretRBRman
    @secretRBRman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can still use Total Commander from the dos days. I remember using arrow keys and F5 to copy files to the other side

  • @anderstroberg3704
    @anderstroberg3704 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love Directory Opus.
    As a close second, I use FreeCommander XE. It's also really good, and free, so I tend to use it on computer I don't use that much.

  • @misiekt.1859
    @misiekt.1859 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Double Commander works on anything and is free.

  • @chedrickmaghanoy5567
    @chedrickmaghanoy5567 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i want free file manager that put customeize tags like notion

  • @Pawlo370
    @Pawlo370 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WHAAAT? 89 dolars?! It's over 320 zlotys!!! CO ZA ŹDZIERSTWO!

  • @semperudellis
    @semperudellis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the idea of this, but it seems unfinished. If someone made a customizable option similar to this, but with a more modern design and possibly a way to create “Setups” that people can download/upload and install. That way you get the customizability without compromising design as well as making presets for those that want more options, but don’t want to put in the time to customize it ourselves.

  • @dorislois
    @dorislois 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This just validated me. Been using Opus for many years now but I would every now and then check out other file explorers just to see if I've been missing out on something. Still, so far, nothing can replace it for me. While mine is now so customized it's unrecognizable from the default settings, I still haven't tapped into all of its features. BUT you don't have to (and don't be overwhelmed by its tons of offerings). What makes Opus great is that when there's something you want to do or have that isn't there, just dive down into its options and you'll likely find a solution under its hood. And you can save every configuration so you don't have to redo it every time. It can be as simple or as complicated as you want. It's like readily having a set of tools (or different toolboxes) when you need it, for whatever task. In other words, spend some minutes, hours, or a day customizing it, then just let it grow to fit your needs. Rich and powerful, once you've tried Opus, you'll realize things can be a lot easier and better, especially if you're a power user.

  • @pyro2677oz
    @pyro2677oz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Considering all the other options available I find this is too expensive for my taste. It's very typical of Aussie companies to over charge.

    • @chartphred1
      @chartphred1 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree, this isn't overcharging, its price gouging to the extreme. The developers are being as greedy as hell.

  • @Banditt42
    @Banditt42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You get what you pay for but this is really expensive for one computer and you still have to pay for major updates.

  • @20NBA01
    @20NBA01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And how can I set it as the default file manager, as you mentioned at 0:14 ??

    • @ThioJoe
      @ThioJoe  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It should ask you that when you install. Or it’s in the settings

  • @zsombor_99
    @zsombor_99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm using Total Commander. 🙂 It's free, dual-window (like this in the video), can filter folders (Ctrl+Alt+[letter]), can use tabs (Ctrl+↑) and can save them to file, have a customizable toolbar at the top and it have a bunch more features, but doesn't contain search feature, unlike the Windows file manager. It also have built-in "quick view" feature ("lister", Ctrl+Q) which can display even pictures and play audio files, too. Total Commander also expandable with lots of plugins. 🙂

    • @Sunstepa
      @Sunstepa ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not free. 😆

    • @zsombor_99
      @zsombor_99 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Sunstepa That's nonsense. The registration is not free, but anyone can use the software itself for unlimited time without registration!

    • @zendakk
      @zendakk ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zsombor_99 What you are saying is nonsense. Abusing evaluation periods does not equal "free". Shall we ask the developer for their opinion?

  • @erikhicks07
    @erikhicks07 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The problem with replacing Explorer is doing so can break many apps that integrate with it, particularly shell extensions

    • @ThioJoe
      @ThioJoe  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I haven't run into any issues. Also it's not like windows explorer goes away, it just isn't the default

    • @erikhicks07
      @erikhicks07 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ThioJoe Really depends on the developer. Good developers use standard APIs and others (many others unfortunately) do not.

    • @Chadycool
      @Chadycool 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have used Directory Opus for the last 2 years with no problems. I keep Windows Explorer as the default, and just use the right click context menu when I want folders to open in Directory Opus or just double click my desktop.

    • @erikhicks07
      @erikhicks07 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Chadycool I'll check it out. Thanks!

  • @ChaunceyGardener
    @ChaunceyGardener 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Q-Dir has the Quadro-View technique and is great!