@@joelshack85 As a gun owner some things I agree with the Democrats other things I Do Not both sides need to work together to come up with sensible gun control. But I doubt it all they do is just yell
@npc's everywhere The book is a piece of fiction, get over it. We live in the real world where ordinary and powerful people are bad natured that behave better the more they are watched.
These cameras are in public locations. You have no right to privacy in public. No different from having a person standing there watching you, they have the right to do so. You also have the right to put cameras up on your property.
This was still true long before police starting using CCTV cameras, long before that technology existed. Ever since the 1900s police are adverse to being filmed and photographed, but yes it is funny. Now thy wear body cams and don't like people recording them still, they'll even turn off their body cams sometimes.
I remember a young woman who was removed from her job at school. That used face recognition software in a store where a woman stole valuable item. The woman at the school had been to a board meeting that was televised in the AI System flagged her. Although it was impossible for her to be there because this occurred while she was at work in an office at the school nowhere near the store, they took her anyway. these systems have great difficulty identifying Black people.
I was cleaning the bathroom at my work the other day and we got these new black latex gloves. The sink is automatic (to keep people from not turning off the water after using it), but I couldn't turn the water on when the sensor was reading my gloves. While those gloves are pretty black, I know some people who have skin just about as dark as those gloves. So what you said just reminded me of what happened.
2 things you'e missed. Scale and debate. The scale is completely different in China. It is everywhere. Debate. There is debate being had in the US. There is zero debate in China. If you are critical of police making wrong decisions, then you should be supportive of AI. AI does not discriminate or make human errors.
Look at the last word of this title my dude, the NSA has already and still is doing that, WITHOUT AI. AI has nothing to do with police installing more cameras, which isn't an issue today since it's difficult for the city to approve. You'll only see CCTV in certain areas. AI that will use these cameras is way further off. AI police will start using in the near future will help solve cases. AI is the clutch we need to not only solve cold cases, but prevent new one's from getting cold in the first place. You're thinking of crime prevention.
I'm all about it. as long as I get to be who I want to be, and get to do the things that I want to do; which has nothing to do with hurting or harassing another person, then I say by all means. the only people that are afraid of this are people that don't have integrity and live a lie or that do terrible things to other people
james machau Idk if you’ve been to China before but honestly systems like these are in a few countries (I’m in asia) and not too invasive. Where China goes overboard is they profile an individual and judge them based on behaviours (such as if they are against the govt etc.)
@@20alphabet There is currently a media campaign.against China depicting them as having poor human rights. The paragon of freedom has deemed them unworthy. The irony is rich like Bezos.
Or become president... "Serving the people" is an illusion for naive idealists like you. The rich and powerful don't go to jail, that's for poor, black folks, of which New Orleans no doubt has many.
When does surveillance become a violation of the Fourth Amendment? Once we're tracking people 24/7 and using facial recognition & machine learning to analyze their behavior, isn't this unlawful search & seizure by retaining record of their activity? Honest question.
"The body cam comes on when the officer is stabbed" Funny how they admit sometimes the only reason they use the camera is for the POLICE benefit. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to come on EVERY TIME they respond to a call or would that be just too helpful to the average citizen's case when their rights are repeatedly violated?
The greater the power to do good the greater the power to do evil. These will always go together. Thus to restrict the ability to do wrong, one must limit the good that can be done. However much the police may like this, we can not let this continue.
The bad thing about cameras at intersections and private businesses is... When an incident \ accident occurs the private business always says "we lost our video" or " its on a loop" and for intersections you have to spend a lot of money hiring a lawyer to get video for proof. These are paid with our tax dollars and WE should not have to hire a dang lawyer in our state to get it. Good ole bubba state. It does NO good to the taxpayer.... only law enforcement at their needs. Share these cameras online with public! All of them!!
That's a terrible idea. Someone can then use these public cameras to track their ex-girlfriend. You want this data to be used to deter crime and apprehend dangerous criminals.
Honestly, I am not against the street cameras as long as they use them for the right reasons because it helps to identify the victims against the assailants and facilitate the investigation in a short-term manner.
I WATCHED an interview where they had all these various technology geeks & influencers talking about Orwell & the question proposed was what would Orwell think of present day society? One of the talking heads mentioned that Orwell wouldn’t be so impressed with the technology but that fact that The Powers That Be, got the mass public to not only pay for it, but able to place a premium on the most personally invasive/intrusive devices. ALL FOR YOUR SAFETY. “Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden
what personally intrusive and invasive law enforcement tech do you know of.... just asking bc I feel I'm being mentally, emotionally, physically, personally, invaded and intruded, by a person in Law Enforcement... and their advance tech devices and sensors...
so we now have a surveillance system just like china, I just hope they use it constitutionally. We are free people and people doing things unusually is to be expected, but when people can't go out of their home and walk around without being questioned by police every step of the way and laws in place that criminalize almost every action that would be benign and not a danger to other people starts to become more like what china is doing. We need to maintain liberty while keeping technology to be a tool and not a weapon of oppression against the people.
Welcome Rule 1.Unusual behavior, unusual movements will be punished with expel from our beloved city to the lower level underground. Rule 2. Asking questions will limit your access to food and drinking water. Moved further down level underground. Rule 3. All visitors must have tracking bracelets unless local residents tattooed barcode. Those are the simple rules to the city. Thank you for listening this broadcast. Have a nice day. A.I N.E.W.Y.O.R.K.
The system will not be used equally I am a Blockchain blockchain dev and it can be manipulated from the back end they lie to everyone about this and I one Hundred percent promise you that this system is being set to to commit a form of genocide that people will not Understand
Why are people so against these cameras? I mean, as soon as you leave your house you already moved out of your privacy space. Its not as if you could walk in your underwear without people seeing you. There is too much crime already, we need more surveillance.
The problem is not surveillance, it is not the collection of all your personal data, it is not identifying your pattern of behavior and your probability of committing a crime in the next 24 hours because of your psychological and routine state. But yes, the purposes that this data will have. A hacker could very well break into the police system and have access to the data of everyone in the city. An authoritarian government could very well force the police to hand over its citizens' data for the purposes of oppression. The police could very well abuse this power to invade your home, because the system has told you that you are a possible terrorist with an attic full of illegal weapons (whereas you are not, you just look like someone who is). Furthermore, if the system fails due to an update bug and starts identifying unlikely suspects, it would fool the police and the real criminals would take advantage of the opportunity. Watch "Minority Report" and ask yourself: if Pre-Crime didn't have certain flaws and if possible criminals had the right to a dignified trial, couldn't it in theory be very good? It turns out that in our reality such problems exist and have not yet been corrected. Our laws were formulated without considering this type of thing. When Pre-Crime is truly established, it will face many challenges before it becomes a 99.9% reliable system. We still have a lot to evolve. If you've read 1984, you'll know that Big Brother was nothing more than cameras all over the place with an oppressive police force in charge. What should we do to get away from this? Reformulating laws.
"I don't want to end up in a version of america where people are afraid to do things in life because of being afraid of being watched all the time" ... Why would anyone be afraid of being watched? It happens all the time.
I have mixed feelings, on one side it's the privacy problems and the potential for abusing the system by government entities, on the other hand it will most definitely lead to a drop in crime. Mmmh.
Wrong we absolutely hate it in the USA but our corrupt political system (local and National) makes it hard to overcome. Hopefully we can learn from San Francisco. We should probably tackle the racism issue first bcuz automated racism is not far fetched in this country.
@@nmj8845 the computer is one Hundred percent going to be programed by ppl with a racist bias doesn't matter which side of the racist bias it comes from it's still very bad
At 6:00 it says the body cam is just turned on. So they've got thousands of cameras watching us 24/7 but they are just being watched sometimes? what if something important happened before the officer got hurt?
Nexus Lego black people are being wrongfully identified thus wrongful arrest. Face recognition only can accurately identify white male faces. That number drops to 65% for black male and even lower black women. This information is readily available for you to research.
@@Studio-ch3qc yes ik about those studies, however I still believe that this 65% of accuracy you talk about, is better than people's eyewitness accounts, which if you research are more fallible than machines, plus you don't really need to recognise the face to tell if someone was armed or not (and if they were really attacking the officer)
Have the police department's anywhere in the world shown that its methods have revolutionized a cities safety or radically evident that its altered the crime statistics os its respective area?
You need video to protect yourself. We had an crazy nightmare old lady next door. You would be shocked how many times she would call the cops just because our kids was playing in the backyard. The worst part is she never even was charged for false reports. We had to go to court twice for nusense neighbor. The only reason the city could not kick is put of the home for an year was because of the security cameras I had installed.
If you're not doing anything wrong, the cameras are not a problem. I would welcome them on my corner. They'll see how nice I keep my yard and see me gently touching my roses. Now, watching you inside your home is a different situation altogether and would be too intrusive.
You have phones and computers and tvs in your house already lol your already being watched if they want to watch you. That's common knowledge but what about when they said the computer THINKS your going to do a crime then come harass you or even arrest you seems like a pretty bad idea all around.
They watched Tyre Nichols get beat to death by one time and this system didn't help and maybe they wasn't suppose to help but why not send one time to beat to death one time if one times in the wrong?
There is a victim mindset when it comes to law enforcement that I've always found very odd, public space surveillance means that any unlawful behavior by law enforcement will be recorded from multiple angles. Comply with police and get a fat stack of cash if they've done something unlawful, surveillance in the west essentially gives you guardian angels that will descend upon an attacker OR be alerted that a citizen is having a medical emergency. In my home town area, a woman was driving on a state highway at night at the end of her shift, she rolled her vehicle which fell down into a small gorge where she remained trapped with broken legs and jaw. She spent nearly 12 hours screaming for help with a broken jaw and was only rescued because a truck driver happened to glance into the gorge from his elevated position and spotted the car obscured by tall grass. AI surveillance of highways would've flagged that she is missing and disappeared near X location, Australia is a big place and it doesn't take long in summer for you to die from dehydration let alone after a car accident in a remote area. The obvious problem with surveillance is, a corrupt power structure shuts cameras down, and deletes the data at the time you allegedly unalive yourself, around the time you have evidence of the most evil crimes committed by the rich and powerful. Storage servers with a 3rd party for EACH city and a mandatory investigation by many different police departments and MANDATORY release of all data of suspect parties. It must be made very clear, that the cameras are watching and deletion of that footage has been made impossible.
She doesn't want those cameras in the inner city because she knows that the arrest rate for young black men will go way up. She doesn't want to make the black kids angry.
With the AI stuff, it's not terrible to alert to unusual activity. The difference is that we have Constitutional rights. AI can alert to unusual activity, but it still needs to be reviewed and confirmed by a human to determine if a crime is being committed. If not, there will be no reason to stop people flagged by AI. It's something that is another tool for effective policing, but needs to be used the proper way.
Great, we just need the fashion industry to catch up with surveillance technology by designing fashionable ski masks for us to protect our civil liberties.
you probably just don't have integrity which is why you are scared of being caught on camera. you're either in the closet, continuously do illegal things. otherwise everything is in the comfort of your own home, you are almost always being watched in public.. the only people I see having a problem with this are people that don't want to get caught doing things they know that they're lying about or keeping secret. which you deserve to be caught anyway
it's called facial recognition software, it doesn't only just recognize your face it recognizes your height, exposed skin tone, the gate in your walk.. I'm all for it if you have integrity, you're not leading a double life, you're not lying to everybody and being down low but saying that you're straight and chastising LGBT people, and you're not committing a crime then you have nothing to worry about. if you're doing any of the above you deserve to be caught.
You can program a AI to remove its bias and prevent it from saving data it should not but you can not do this with people nor can you stop people from violating data privacy laws which only means people should not be allowed near raw data.
No matter what this system is going to be used for genocide also I'm a Blockchain dev and you even even manipulate and delete stuff from the blockchain so everyone is really F'd if you have voted ever in your life I highly suggest not ever doing it again it will cause you much suffering in the near future.
No you can't remove the bias from Ai, the only use of intelligence is to make decisions and filter information and the only way to do that is bias just as you can't just delete the data because the utility of the surveillance system is proportional to the amount of data it has access to. You can't build a surveillance police state that doesn't monitor its citizens at every turn and oppress the underprivileged because it is the function of the SPS to do just that.
The biggest problem with surveillance is that many times we are unaware if we are breaking some statute as there are more than any one person could possible know. However if they are used to go after crime of people harming each other that is not a problem. That is because harming people is wrong.
Person of Interest got us used to the idea of being surveilled. I cannot understand why everyone is outraged. If you post on social media, use a cell phone, work out with a gps tracker etc. One would surmise that you are OK with it. Ignorance is Bliss
They need this in the NYCTA subway to catch farebeaters. If I can get a ticket sent to my home for speeding due to my license plate being photographed why not get pedestrian farebeaters?
5:54 So, the body camera on the cop ONLY starts recording AFTER the cop is stabbed? Interesting... You do realize that if the cop is committing a crime (like they do quite often) then there's no recording of the fact. Why not keep that body camera on 24/7?
This is cool but also really scary. It seems really powerful, and like anything powerful it could be used for good or for evil. Unfortunately power tends to corrupt and I don't know how we're really going to solve that. Like that police chief said, they have accountability measures, but I'm sure all police have some type of accountability measures. Yet, you still see lots of news about police officers behaving in ways counter to public safety.
Dies these cameras work, went new Orleans, on the first night 5 cars got broken into then on the second night 16 cars got broken into including my own some was parked underneath the camera.
Park Jeesong That is assuming crime is everywhere all the time So the police would say it’s so bad we need cameras when In truth we don’t need them our cities get safer if we help people to get off the streets
@@drzoidberg844 it is very efficient way to protect the citizens. good example South Korea. Also, this will help prosecute the criminals with solid evidence. Yes, it is important to keep the people off from the street. But question is how?
Yes it will be used for genocide I promise you and I'm a Blockchain dev and the blockchain can be manipulated as well they are lying to everyone about that.
@@TheHyphen social credit caste system ppl who are ignorant enough to vote and the fact that we are being given incentive to program it with bias just to name a few things. It will be abused I can one Hundred percent garunteed you that.
@@TheHyphen I am really not pulling you're leg either but the thing is no one will care until it's too late. Just if your smart save up and find a place outside of the city. That's the only decent advice I could give anyone.
Listen, if it wasn't for cameras...George Floyd would just be another statistic. Despite the downside, cameras are good for catching people committing crime.
![HIWWHEE | OHM [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OJJLtTLqLag/mqdefault.jpg)
Having a problem with government surveillance is too late We should have had this conversation and laws on the books for this 15 years ago
Yeah let's give up
@@namesjames1 - if you were even remotely intelligent you would know that once the cat is out of the bag it wont go back in...
@@beeshaw9924 It was a joke Einstein.
Bee Shaw exactly why any push from Democrats on gun control will be resisted!
@@joelshack85 As a gun owner some things I agree with the Democrats other things I Do Not both sides need to work together to come up with sensible gun control. But I doubt it all they do is just yell
Has nobody read 1984?
We need to love big brother before we die!😁
What about the game watch dogs 2?
Yes but the bad guys read it first now quit talking and revert back to your screen
what's so dystopian about having multiple witnesses and accurate evidence.
@npc's everywhere The book is a piece of fiction, get over it. We live in the real world where ordinary and powerful people are bad natured that behave better the more they are watched.
We have no Rights
The American people are willingly Giving up their rights, Liberals want to ban offensive words and weapons.
The right wants to ban free choice.
What rights do we not have? The right to rob people?
These cameras are in public locations. You have no right to privacy in public. No different from having a person standing there watching you, they have the right to do so. You also have the right to put cameras up on your property.
We have more rights in America than any other country
they put these cameras up every where, then go ballistic when you take out your cameras.
Funny right
This was still true long before police starting using CCTV cameras, long before that technology existed. Ever since the 1900s police are adverse to being filmed and photographed, but yes it is funny. Now thy wear body cams and don't like people recording them still, they'll even turn off their body cams sometimes.
I remember a young woman who was removed from her job at school. That used face recognition software in a store where a woman stole valuable item. The woman at the school had been to a board meeting that was televised in the AI System flagged her. Although it was impossible for her to be there because this occurred while she was at work in an office at the school nowhere near the store, they took her anyway. these systems have great difficulty identifying Black people.
I was cleaning the bathroom at my work the other day and we got these new black latex gloves. The sink is automatic (to keep people from not turning off the water after using it), but I couldn't turn the water on when the sensor was reading my gloves. While those gloves are pretty black, I know some people who have skin just about as dark as those gloves. So what you said just reminded me of what happened.
Americans blasting China for this, now they are doing it themselves 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Their doing it against the will of americans.
2 things you'e missed. Scale and debate. The scale is completely different in China. It is everywhere. Debate. There is debate being had in the US. There is zero debate in China. If you are critical of police making wrong decisions, then you should be supportive of AI. AI does not discriminate or make human errors.
US is the 1st one to be abusing this technology, but China has exposed it and put it into place 1st.
America, has ALWAYS got to '1 Up' the 'Commies'... 🤔😞💩👎
Can we say Person of Interest. Big Brother is watching!
*Mass surveillance welcome to 1984 the Orwellian Nightmare.*
shows like Person Of Interest warned
Look at the last word of this title my dude, the NSA has already and still is doing that, WITHOUT AI. AI has nothing to do with police installing more cameras, which isn't an issue today since it's difficult for the city to approve. You'll only see CCTV in certain areas. AI that will use these cameras is way further off. AI police will start using in the near future will help solve cases. AI is the clutch we need to not only solve cold cases, but prevent new one's from getting cold in the first place. You're thinking of crime prevention.
I'm all about it. as long as I get to be who I want to be, and get to do the things that I want to do; which has nothing to do with hurting or harassing another person, then I say by all means. the only people that are afraid of this are people that don't have integrity and live a lie or that do terrible things to other people
You have some thing to hide ? Because I don’t care about mass surveillance it makes the world safer . I trust cameras more than humans
1:58 now we can finally see why the chicken crossed the road.
I thought China was the surveillance state😂😂😂.....
America is the land of the free....
LOLOLOLOL
james machau Idk if you’ve been to China before but honestly systems like these are in a few countries (I’m in asia) and not too invasive.
Where China goes overboard is they profile an individual and judge them based on behaviours (such as if they are against the govt etc.)
The USA hasn't been the _land of the free_ since the Federal Reserve Act and the homosexual J. Edgar Hoover.
@@20alphabet There is currently a media campaign.against China depicting them as having poor human rights. The paragon of freedom has deemed them unworthy. The irony is rich like Bezos.
That's just an illusion for the sheep
So if US is adopting AI to analyze surveillance footage, it is good. If China is doing the same thing, it is bad.
Or become president...
"Serving the people" is an illusion for naive idealists like you. The rich and powerful don't go to jail, that's for poor, black folks, of which New Orleans no doubt has many.
@@Avantime china wants to create a "social credit system" while the US wants to keep crime rates low. two completely different things.
@OPSAT lol, the US government serves only corporations.
@@Avantime
No, don't try to justify this over reach. All of it is bad just like china.
Steamy Car Sex= suspects committing unusual activity at night.
More people need to do it so that the AI can be trained that it's normal. ;)
so you can't even walk your dog with out being labeled as suspicious
When does surveillance become a violation of the Fourth Amendment? Once we're tracking people 24/7 and using facial recognition & machine learning to analyze their behavior, isn't this unlawful search & seizure by retaining record of their activity? Honest question.
Its so sad 😔 watch these cameras soon will be weaponized.
Have you ever heard of the Patriot Act?
It's probably against the Constitution but it's legal
Orwell’s 1984 coming into full effect
Yup but it's more like all dystopian stuff is too
or is this justice on a massive scale via unlimited witnesses
"The body cam comes on when the officer is stabbed"
Funny how they admit sometimes the only reason they use the camera is for the POLICE benefit. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to come on EVERY TIME they respond to a call or would that be just too helpful to the average citizen's case when their rights are repeatedly violated?
Had the same thought.
Minority Report here we come!
I love that movie and might put in the DVD tonight.
Y’all should watch Person of Interest
You seem like a "person of interest" in a robbery that happned yday. Lol
Also Enemy of the State, and Minority Report. Already in use to target ,survail,aharass and entrap people. See Targeted Individuals.
that show = indoctrination😒
The greater the power to do good the greater the power to do evil. These will always go together. Thus to restrict the ability to do wrong, one must limit the good that can be done. However much the police may like this, we can not let this continue.
You can do NOTHING
Oh! SHYUT!!
Actually aren't these all countermeasures to the advanced methods criminals use these days?
1984, Big Brother, ... I prefer individual freedom over safety for obeying sheepish masses
MSM propaganda for the police state
WSJ is solid
That red truck thing was pretty dope
Might as well give up your smartphone and your internet because Americans are being monitored there as well.
The guy walking behind them and looking at the camera at 2:09 hahahaha
AHAHAHAHAHA
Definitely need more of this in Philadelphia
How do many people fail to realize this? Lol, it's been happening for years. #WakeUp people.
Simply Myla K. Doesn’t matter how long it’s been happening, genius. Wrong is wrong.
@@heavyizthacrown-5842 don't try to insult me.
And it gets worst by the minute!
7:18 - That was the most video-game-like holding of the gun. They had to do it so obvious so that the AI system could recognize it easily.
The bad thing about cameras at intersections and private businesses is... When an incident \ accident occurs the private business always says "we lost our video" or " its on a loop" and for intersections you have to spend a lot of money hiring a lawyer to get video for proof. These are paid with our tax dollars and WE should not have to hire a dang lawyer in our state to get it. Good ole bubba state. It does NO good to the taxpayer.... only law enforcement at their needs. Share these cameras online with public! All of them!!
That's a terrible idea. Someone can then use these public cameras to track their ex-girlfriend. You want this data to be used to deter crime and apprehend dangerous criminals.
Pay for everbridge visual command center, they access almost every public cameras across the US
So you mean the very thing we've been pretending to be fighting against with China, were now implementing right here in the Land of the Free? Lol
Honestly, I am not against the street cameras as long as they use them for the right reasons because it helps to identify the victims against the assailants and facilitate the investigation in a short-term manner.
Red shirts.. red trucks.. I'll just drive a black car and wear a black shirt. Lol.
I WATCHED
an interview where they had all these various technology geeks & influencers talking about Orwell & the question proposed was what would Orwell think of present day society? One of the talking heads mentioned that Orwell wouldn’t be so impressed with the technology but that fact that The Powers That Be, got the mass public to not only pay for it, but able to place a premium on the most personally invasive/intrusive devices.
ALL FOR YOUR SAFETY.
“Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say.”
-Edward Snowden
what personally intrusive and invasive law enforcement tech do you know of.... just asking bc I feel I'm being mentally, emotionally, physically, personally, invaded and intruded, by a person in Law Enforcement... and their advance tech devices and sensors...
so we now have a surveillance system just like china, I just hope they use it constitutionally. We are free people and people doing things unusually is to be expected, but when people can't go out of their home and walk around without being questioned by police every step of the way and laws in place that criminalize almost every action that would be benign and not a danger to other people starts to become more like what china is doing. We need to maintain liberty while keeping technology to be a tool and not a weapon of oppression against the people.
They will abuse
The police can't even handle bodycams. Imagine what they would do with this.
manb4war Solve more crimes, increase safety and prevent police errors of course
@@Mark-uk8wz what about when the computer says you did something you didn't then what your just F'd
Welcome
Rule 1.Unusual behavior, unusual movements will be punished with expel from our beloved city to the lower level underground.
Rule 2. Asking questions will limit your access to food and drinking water. Moved further down level underground.
Rule 3. All visitors must have tracking bracelets unless local residents tattooed barcode.
Those are the simple rules to the city.
Thank you for listening this broadcast. Have a nice day.
A.I N.E.W.Y.O.R.K.
Awesome. Now we can watch and finally prove all the crime cops commit.
exactly....as long as the system is used equaly on everyone.
@@KevinP32270 Yeah right 😂
The system will not be used equally I am a Blockchain blockchain dev and it can be manipulated from the back end they lie to everyone about this and I one Hundred percent promise you that this system is being set to to commit a form of genocide that people will not Understand
Why are people so against these cameras? I mean, as soon as you leave your house you already moved out of your privacy space. Its not as if you could walk in your underwear without people seeing you. There is too much crime already, we need more surveillance.
The problem is not surveillance, it is not the collection of all your personal data, it is not identifying your pattern of behavior and your probability of committing a crime in the next 24 hours because of your psychological and routine state. But yes, the purposes that this data will have. A hacker could very well break into the police system and have access to the data of everyone in the city. An authoritarian government could very well force the police to hand over its citizens' data for the purposes of oppression. The police could very well abuse this power to invade your home, because the system has told you that you are a possible terrorist with an attic full of illegal weapons (whereas you are not, you just look like someone who is). Furthermore, if the system fails due to an update bug and starts identifying unlikely suspects, it would fool the police and the real criminals would take advantage of the opportunity. Watch "Minority Report" and ask yourself: if Pre-Crime didn't have certain flaws and if possible criminals had the right to a dignified trial, couldn't it in theory be very good? It turns out that in our reality such problems exist and have not yet been corrected. Our laws were formulated without considering this type of thing. When Pre-Crime is truly established, it will face many challenges before it becomes a 99.9% reliable system. We still have a lot to evolve. If you've read 1984, you'll know that Big Brother was nothing more than cameras all over the place with an oppressive police force in charge. What should we do to get away from this? Reformulating laws.
Sales of Groucho glasses are going to go through the roof.
😂stop!
Lol !
"I don't want to end up in a version of america where people are afraid to do things in life because of being afraid of being watched all the time" ... Why would anyone be afraid of being watched? It happens all the time.
I have mixed feelings, on one side it's the privacy problems and the potential for abusing the system by government entities, on the other hand it will most definitely lead to a drop in crime. Mmmh.
Wall Street journal and their double standard at its finest
Everyone the loves Demonisation of China
When china does it the world put negative connotations, when the states does it the title seems jolly LOL
Wrong we absolutely hate it in the USA but our corrupt political system (local and National) makes it hard to overcome. Hopefully we can learn from San Francisco. We should probably tackle the racism issue first bcuz automated racism is not far fetched in this country.
@@nmj8845 the computer is one Hundred percent going to be programed by ppl with a racist bias doesn't matter which side of the racist bias it comes from it's still very bad
At 6:00 it says the body cam is just turned on.
So they've got thousands of cameras watching us 24/7 but they are just being watched sometimes? what if something important happened before the officer got hurt?
The lady says that black people are getting wrongfully arrested, but then doesn't want cameras that can help stop this?
She obviously feels uneasy the cameras will reinforce and justify police action.
@@SayNoToIdiots no she's contradicting herself, if anything cameras would show the truth, so if the person is unarmed no one can say otherwise
Nexus Lego black people are being wrongfully identified thus wrongful arrest. Face recognition only can accurately identify white male faces. That number drops to 65% for black male and even lower black women. This information is readily available for you to research.
@@Studio-ch3qc yes ik about those studies, however I still believe that this 65% of accuracy you talk about, is better than people's eyewitness accounts, which if you research are more fallible than machines, plus you don't really need to recognise the face to tell if someone was armed or not (and if they were really attacking the officer)
It will accelerate it not stop it
Have the police department's anywhere in the world shown that its methods have revolutionized a cities safety or radically evident that its altered the crime statistics os its respective area?
No, because it doesn't.
this needs to be banned immediately worldwide
You need video to protect yourself.
We had an crazy nightmare old lady next door. You would be shocked how many times she would call the cops just because our kids was playing in the backyard.
The worst part is she never even was charged for false reports. We had to go to court twice for nusense neighbor. The only reason the city could not kick is put of the home for an year was because of the security cameras I had installed.
Located: Man seen eating at Taco Bell’s all over town.
Designated: pathetic.
Computer, locate my freaking AirPods for the tenth time.
If you're not doing anything wrong, the cameras are not a problem. I would welcome them on my corner. They'll see how nice I keep my yard and see me gently touching my roses. Now, watching you inside your home is a different situation altogether and would be too intrusive.
You have phones and computers and tvs in your house already lol your already being watched if they want to watch you. That's common knowledge but what about when they said the computer THINKS your going to do a crime then come harass you or even arrest you seems like a pretty bad idea all around.
They watched Tyre Nichols get beat to death by one time and this system didn't help and maybe they wasn't suppose to help but why not send one time to beat to death one time if one times in the wrong?
There is a victim mindset when it comes to law enforcement that I've always found very odd, public space surveillance means that any unlawful behavior by law enforcement will be recorded from multiple angles. Comply with police and get a fat stack of cash if they've done something unlawful, surveillance in the west essentially gives you guardian angels that will descend upon an attacker OR be alerted that a citizen is having a medical emergency.
In my home town area, a woman was driving on a state highway at night at the end of her shift, she rolled her vehicle which fell down into a small gorge where she remained trapped with broken legs and jaw. She spent nearly 12 hours screaming for help with a broken jaw and was only rescued because a truck driver happened to glance into the gorge from his elevated position and spotted the car obscured by tall grass. AI surveillance of highways would've flagged that she is missing and disappeared near X location, Australia is a big place and it doesn't take long in summer for you to die from dehydration let alone after a car accident in a remote area.
The obvious problem with surveillance is, a corrupt power structure shuts cameras down, and deletes the data at the time you allegedly unalive yourself, around the time you have evidence of the most evil crimes committed by the rich and powerful. Storage servers with a 3rd party for EACH city and a mandatory investigation by many different police departments and MANDATORY release of all data of suspect parties.
It must be made very clear, that the cameras are watching and deletion of that footage has been made impossible.
She doesn't want those cameras in the inner city because she knows that the arrest rate for young black men will go way up. She doesn't want to make the black kids angry.
With the AI stuff, it's not terrible to alert to unusual activity. The difference is that we have Constitutional rights. AI can alert to unusual activity, but it still needs to be reviewed and confirmed by a human to determine if a crime is being committed. If not, there will be no reason to stop people flagged by AI. It's something that is another tool for effective policing, but needs to be used the proper way.
Minority Report. Precrime Division
blue2x2005 lets do it!
Great, we just need the fashion industry to catch up with surveillance technology by designing fashionable ski masks for us to protect our civil liberties.
you probably just don't have integrity which is why you are scared of being caught on camera. you're either in the closet, continuously do illegal things. otherwise everything is in the comfort of your own home, you are almost always being watched in public.. the only people I see having a problem with this are people that don't want to get caught doing things they know that they're lying about or keeping secret. which you deserve to be caught anyway
Some of the footage was taken in a Chile street. They are already watching us.
if the criminal changes his shirt while hiding his face from the camera you need to do manual mode again to find him haha
it's called facial recognition software, it doesn't only just recognize your face it recognizes your height, exposed skin tone, the gate in your walk.. I'm all for it if you have integrity, you're not leading a double life, you're not lying to everybody and being down low but saying that you're straight and chastising LGBT people, and you're not committing a crime then you have nothing to worry about. if you're doing any of the above you deserve to be caught.
It will get worse than you can ever imagine
1984 wasn't just a book
1MNUTZ A commercial and film
At 4:04I think she meant to say commit more crime.
There's no privacy, therefore no more secrets. Let that sink in.
1984 .... we are behind schedule . China its light years ahead... i hope we don't catch up ...
music music they're TRYING
and when there is a glitch in the system?
Then you go to prison for nothing or worse Maybe even get a death penalty if your really unlucky.
@@blacklivesmatter1734 like this if all go to prison who will buy and use computer?
@@auro1986 personal computers use too much energy and Harm the environment according to the world economic forum.
@@blacklivesmatter1734 and what about most computers you sell to world economic forum?
@@auro1986 what??? No one sells computers to the world economic forum man...what are you even talking about.
That guy at 2:40 must’ve done something stupid enough for them to cut it out 😂
But ... I want the guy who would kidnap my child to be caught asap. That technology is both scary and so easy to sell.
WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN
Informative video. Scary subject.
Technology is advanced. There currently is technology to read citizens minds ..it's called voice to skull.
Watch Dogs
When you want to see rules over you....... look to those that have no cameras watching them.
Lol you need 5G to make it work properly Huawei will supply
You can program a AI to remove its bias and prevent it from saving data it should not but you can not do this with people nor can you stop people from violating data privacy laws which only means people should not be allowed near raw data.
No matter what this system is going to be used for genocide also I'm a Blockchain dev and you even even manipulate and delete stuff from the blockchain so everyone is really F'd if you have voted ever in your life I highly suggest not ever doing it again it will cause you much suffering in the near future.
No you can't remove the bias from Ai, the only use of intelligence is to make decisions and filter information and the only way to do that is bias just as you can't just delete the data because the utility of the surveillance system is proportional to the amount of data it has access to.
You can't build a surveillance police state that doesn't monitor its citizens at every turn and oppress the underprivileged because it is the function of the SPS to do just that.
The biggest problem with surveillance is that many times we are unaware if we are breaking some statute as there are more than any one person could possible know. However if they are used to go after crime of people harming each other that is not a problem. That is because harming people is wrong.
They are one Hundred percent going to use this as an excuse to commit genocides and mass detentions
Person of Interest got us used to the idea of being surveilled. I cannot understand why everyone is outraged. If you post on social media, use a cell phone, work out with a gps tracker etc. One would surmise that you are OK with it. Ignorance is Bliss
Dont have to worry about a policed state if you have a company, have millions, or financially secure but if youre living in poverty, youre fucked.
They need this in the NYCTA subway to catch farebeaters. If I can get a ticket sent to my home for speeding due to my license plate being photographed why not get pedestrian farebeaters?
Surveillance is surveilled or surveilled is surveillanced.
5:54 So, the body camera on the cop ONLY starts recording AFTER the cop is stabbed? Interesting... You do realize that if the cop is committing a crime (like they do quite often) then there's no recording of the fact. Why not keep that body camera on 24/7?
This is cool but also really scary. It seems really powerful, and like anything powerful it could be used for good or for evil. Unfortunately power tends to corrupt and I don't know how we're really going to solve that. Like that police chief said, they have accountability measures, but I'm sure all police have some type of accountability measures. Yet, you still see lots of news about police officers behaving in ways counter to public safety.
Do you want thought crime?
This is how we get thought crime.
Remember pre crime is a crime.
Well it’s still a bandaid effect. It doesn’t seem to stop crime. You still get shot and killed in the US camera or no camera.
They arent using this enough. Track all repeat violent offenders in real time
Cool, now find my other lost pair of socks.
Please install this in Chicago highways. I'm tired of hearing that some douch did a drive-by on i57.
I better get my hair done.
Dies these cameras work, went new Orleans, on the first night 5 cars got broken into then on the second night 16 cars got broken into including my own some was parked underneath the camera.
The new 1984 movie looks great
Caleb Cruz When does it come out?
Historical footage = replay.
we could easily get rid of crime in our country with better jobs, education, and healthcare. there is no need for all this ai on our streets
Safety over privacy or privacy over safety
Park Jeesong That is assuming crime is everywhere all the time
So the police would say it’s so bad we need cameras when In truth we don’t need them our cities get safer if we help people to get off the streets
@@drzoidberg844 it is very efficient way to protect the citizens.
good example South Korea.
Also, this will help prosecute the criminals with solid evidence.
Yes, it is important to keep the people off from the street. But question is how?
Me: so do you know what I'm thinking? 😅
Big brother: yes I do actually,
Me: *speechless*
Big brother: don't be scared 😊
I don't think anything is wrong here. As long as the police uses this for appropriate reasons. Then I support this. Simple
"Defund the police" fund AI i see what's happening now.
Yes it will be used for genocide I promise you and I'm a Blockchain dev and the blockchain can be manipulated as well they are lying to everyone about that.
@@blacklivesmatter1734 how?
@@TheHyphen social credit caste system ppl who are ignorant enough to vote and the fact that we are being given incentive to program it with bias just to name a few things. It will be abused I can one Hundred percent garunteed you that.
@@TheHyphen I am really not pulling you're leg either but the thing is no one will care until it's too late. Just if your smart save up and find a place outside of the city. That's the only decent advice I could give anyone.
Put this in everywhere please.
Listen, if it wasn't for cameras...George Floyd would just be another statistic. Despite the downside, cameras are good for catching people committing crime.
Maybe this system of identification could reduce the number of night time police raids. Especially if the wrong address is raided.
This is how most of the surveillance is done its other ways and techniques used but this is just one of the few
Hello big brother
Fluffysaurus Yang Gang
TBH better to have a drone inspect you than a racist/corrupt cop