Proper 4x4s: Land Rover Defender vs Toyota Land Cruiser and Mitsubishi Shogun
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- Driving brought together the Toyota Land Cruiser and Mitsubishi Shogun to see if either can replace the outgoing Land Rover Defender as proper 4x4 king of the hill.
Our testing ground was the Mud Master off-road driving course, at Brands Hatch; littered with ruts, hills, moguls and water wades, this is the sort of place that would have a Nissan Qashqai driver breaking out in a cold sweat.
Sorry guys This contest is not fair and very biased, the Pajero are not in offroad tires and it is also NOT ON STOCK RIM AND TIRES ALSO, look at the Rims very different from the real rims, just "googling" the 2015 pajero and the wheels are very different.. Also get A guy who know Mitsubishi car very well to drive it just like mitsu's senior mechanics or Stephane Peterhansel or rally drivers. Mitsubishi had great champions history in racing like in "Dakar Rally" and "World Rally championship". And manufacturer like toyota,ford,land rover until now(2015), can only just dreaming that they wanted to achieved like Mitsubishi did in Dakar and WRC. Mitsubishi are very underrated from other fanboys. But In fact i had drive and also become passanger in the Pajero Sport(montero sport) 2013 for long journey and i'm feel comfortable in the seats ,my body feels not too tired in long journey, much better than in the honda CR -V and toyota Fortuner. And the car's power & torque are great enough in the motorway/toll road and climbing/ hill roads, & Fun to drive also quite nimble & stable on the road.. I Like Mtisubishi.
+Big Brother Very well said. In 80's and 90's Mitsubishi was the most respected off road manufacter and Pajero was one the most well-succeeded and reliable 4x4. This guys are just too stupid to make a test like this.
I own a 1992 Pajero (L144 Portuguese full-extras version called VIP that was manufactured in Portugal) and it still runs until today with full origin stock and 344k km's. It's also very confortable with his suspension full leather seats and has a very advanced suspension for his own time (front independent). When you drive it, you just have the sensation that you are driving a rally dakar machine and feeling all the that the Dakar pilots had in the golden era of Mitsu!
One of the biggest and most famous specialist in Mitsubishi Pajero is the off road and rally driver Hiroshi Masuoka who have won a Dakar, find some videos of him here in youtube!
Let the haters talk.
+Carlos Amaral and this test is biased clearly .. Because we all know the Prado is certainly the most comfortable ,toughest ,biggest ,roughest ,meanest 4x4 in here with all the luxury and premium build quality and gadgets to match .. And it should certainly not be put up against a "Pajero" which has the same off road ability as a lifted RAV 4.
+Big Brother Those 20'' rims on the Mitsubishi are the standard wheels on the range topping SG4 Shogun in the U.K but the lower spec SG2 and SG3 models come on 18'' wheels as standard.
Your correct and they changed pajero tires to normal tires they did this because the pajero can do more better off road than land rover defender.
Couple of things here, the road had been used a couple of times makiking it very slippery for the last vehicle which was the Mitsubishi and again as mention the ground clearance plus tyres were a disadvantage.
Japanese jeeps are better then UK. Put Landcruser 80, Shogun 2, Patrol and you will see!
Stop smoking lord Shi t!
Defender is the king of the workshops, that is what it is. Go Toyota. The. G class Merc. is teh king.
+tunin111
Off vehicles are going to get damaged. I have a Land Cruiser and it is primary off road vehicle but I would not take it everywhere due to the risk of damage and I would take my defender anywhere.
I have never seen a video made by a British person or British tv program when any other off roader or SUV in... to win in a chalange against Land Rover......i know its capabile off roader..but its not the best..or reliable but somehow still wins every chalange ....i wonder why...:))
Jeep Wrangler..?
King of the hill maybe in UK
Land Rover - Best 4x4 by Far. Just a pitty you left out the Discovery models
If you do real off road in Asia or Australia , South America you wouldn’t mention a rover .
What a disapointment for the Mitsubishi..
this has to be one of the weakest off road courses in the world I go down driveways worse than that with a two wheel drive 3 /4 ton Chevy
Not fair comparing a short wheel Base vs 2 long wheel bases.
You should have used the LWB version of the Land rover or the SWB versions of the Pajero and Prado.
The defender has more ground clearance and therefore it is better? WTF.
And you obviously beached the Mitsubishi on purpose.
Wankers.
+Walter Black
Defender is not a car, Discovery yes it is a 4x4 car, Its like comparing an excavator to a tank or a lorry to a forklift.
Dont fool us..Mistsubushi has a great record in terms of rally, sales offroad etc... You guys are unfair..besides pajero is a cheap car and reasonable to buy.. i beg to disagree with this test...thumbs down on you guys
.Big Big SORRY 😡
You got that wrong guys. The Landcruiser is a full blown off-roader, which happens to look like a family car. It's the other way around for most other SUVs.
Mabey so but not the prado they have here
This is the most ridiculous, biased 4x4 comparison i have ever watched.
***** I do drive a Toyota..
***** I just noticed you've replied to a few other comments on here. You obviously own a land rover; which explains why your head is so far up your arse you can't see how much of a piece of shit they are.
+fukthegoog like most euro trahinistas, you live in the past. The world has moved on and expect more than past glories in their new vehicles. Things like airbags for instance.
***** you are an absolute moron. You clearly have no knowledge of true 4wding. The lr is too small inside, the seats are terrible, the air con is terrible, the engine is grossly underpowered, the lack of engine braking is downright dangerous. In fact, it is probably the most unsafe 4x4 currently on sale. No panels line up correctly, it leaks, the build quality is disgraceful. The absolute deadshits that believe this makes it a good 4x4 because of it's "simple design" need professional help. It is a bucket of shit.
***** that is just plain wrong. If you had been to a country with a harsh environment like Australia or south Africa, you would see that almost no one drives them because of how terribly unreliable they are. The only place in the world where they are well respected is the UK because their climate and conditions are child's play compared to here. In Australia they are considered a joke because they simply just fall apart
You should have compared the LR with a Jeep Wrangler, not 7 seat SUV's. The Toyota and Mitsubishi are discovery 4 rivals, a person thinking of buying SUV with luxuries, 7 seats and off road capability does not think of buying a hardcore defender and vies versa.
KING OF THE HILL MY ASS. Their isn't anywhere a landrover can go that a landcruiser can't go faster. Especially a landcruiser ute their as tough as nails. Also I wouldn't call this 4 wheeling, you can see a town in the background 4 wheeling should be miles from anywhere except maybe a campground. Also the Mitsubishi didn't really have a fair go. Of course all terrains aren't going to work in mud, they will run in to a racing slick.
Have u been to third world county like ours where reliability matters and roads r like this.. The choice is obviously Japanese ones.
+Bibekarj i agree ,I have a 1991 Isuzu Trooper LS with 218k miles and it's a tank.
Well that test didn't quite go as expected.
A coupe of things. 1. It's such a shame that the Mitsubishi Shogan, known as Pajero here in Australia, wasn't shod with the same tyres as the other 2 vehicles. Having owned a Pajero with 2" lift and good off road tyres, I can tell you that it was damn good on road, in mud, on sand and for towing a camper trailer. Great warranty too.
2. The Landcruiser with that flash air lift system must surely be top of the range?
3. Land Rovers are amazing. I've owned and loved them. Unfortunately they haven't loved me back. Maybe in the UK it's a different story, but here in Oz Land Rover is thought of as unreliable and expensive to repair. This is also my experience on two LR that I owned.
I'm sorry to see the Defender coming to it's end. As a former owner, I could not understand why Land Rover could not improve on the Defender and keep it in the market. It's got great heritage but someone somewhere failed to keep up with the times.
+Bill Blinky It's not just in Oz. Here in the US, Land Rovers are also famous for being unreliable. You can get a 5 year old top of the line Range Rover for the same price as a 5 year old Subaru, that's how much they depreciate. On the other hand, Toyota trucks & SUVs keep their value. Some FJ Cruisers are selling at around 90% of new prices lately. It's hard to beat the Japanese when it comes to reliability.
+spiritusmentis That's interesting as it says much about a car that has failed to live up to it's potential. Here in Australia Subaru has a wonderful name and is quite popular as a city and country vehicle where serious 4x4 isn't as important as reliability and that nice all wheel system that Subs are loved for.
+Bill Blinky I'm sure LR was the king at some point in history, but I don't think that's the case anymore. Most rich people simply don't go off road, because it's a dangerous activity. LR can sell more luxury-livingrooms-on-wheels than a true offroad vehicle, so they keep on adding luxury bloat and complex electronics to their models (which in turn make their cars unreliable). Even the Mercedes G-wagen is extremely bloated now. The foundation of the vehicle hasn't changed, but Mercedes added a bunch of luxury crap, so now it's heavier and more anemic, not to mention very inefficient when it comes to gas mileage. And those super complex air suspensions are bound to fail sooner or later, and are most likely impossible to repair on your own.
Here in the US, you'll only see Jeep Wranglers, Toyota Tacomas, FJ Cruisers & 4Runners, and maybe a Nissan here and there at popular off roading spots. OK maybe a rich Russian and his Russian buddies in a Range Rover, but even that's rare. (200 series) Land Cruisers are hard to find in the US, because they cost $85,000 for which you can get the nearly identical Lexus LX. Subaru has been the best selling brand in the US for a few years now. They're almost everywhere in the pacific Northwest where it rains all the time, and in the Northeast where there's lots of snow. In Colorado, you'll almost exclusively see Subarus and Toyotas in the mountains. I personally replaced my turbo Subaru Outback with a 4Runner a few weeks ago and couldn't be more satisfied. It's a shame the 4Runner is only sold in the Americas...it's a great 'stripped down' version of the Land Cruiser for half the price, more ground clearance and better approach angles. Then again, Australia and South Africa have the super awesome 70 series Land Cruisers AND they come with diesel...something we'll probably never get here :'(
@Bill Blinky Couldn't have said it better. Obviously you know 4WD's
Would a SWB Shogun on off road tyres have done better? I don't know much about off roading, but seems the Shogun was set up to fail by the producers.
I"m a Land Rover man and would love to hear Land Rovers beating the crap out of Toyota and Mitsubishi but this is an unfair comparison.
That LC and Pajero should go against the Discovery or Range Rover. A closer apple to apple comparison.
you compare the mad of american come to african
Nothing like a bit of bias when comparing apples to oranges. Ask anyone which vehicle they would prefer to travel through the centre of Australia or through the Cape York Peninsula in, and you will find Landrover, Range Rover and most of the other euro trash 4x4's would be bottom of the list. They are streets behind the Japanese in reliability, serviceability and functionality. l will admit that they have some clever technology in them, but alas, it is poorly executed and comes complete with a boot load of gremlins. I suppose when you consider the overall equation of safety, performance, reliabilty, economy and comfort, the Land Rover is right up the with the Lada.
Amateurishly done. Defender can't be the King at least because of its lower reliability (you do not want to stuck in the middle of a mud road). Anyway, if you are using a short Defender, you should use short versions of Land Cruiser and Shogun (Pajero). Did you install the same tires on all cars? What was an air pressure in tires? And yet, regarding the ground clearance, it can be easily increased for all cars by replacing stock shocks and springs, which are not well designed usually in all standard cars. Etc, etc... And then run a test; otherwise, it's useless. And if we are going to vote for a king, then where are other candidates, like Merc G, Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, Nissan Patrol and Pathfinder?
Its not even a fair contest...lwb vs swb...why did you guys not just change the shogun tyres ....
Sounds like some money changed hands their with land rover....
The Defender is comparable to the Toyota 70 series......
Can someone redo this test, but properly this time. Like, give the Pajero proper offroad wheels, or use the proper name of the toyota(Prado landcruiser and landcruiser are 2 different cars)
In Europe the land cruiser Prado is sold as a land cruiser. The regular land cruiser is in some European countries sold as land cruiser V8. So they aren't wrong when not using the name 'land cruiser Prado' which is not the name used by Toyota Europe.
Brecht Schatteman but it totally wrong comparing short wheelbased cars to long wheelbased cars for start!
@@brechtthebest in Europe there is prado so stfu idiot
If everyone is saying Bias. I can very confidently say the same! I drove Prado for a year, and now going to Pajero. Just saying
76 series Land cruiser would pull the three of those around that track..
Toyota Land Cruiser King of the hill
Martin Benford Looks like a mall cruiser compared to a hardcore offroader
4:40 - that was a very dangerous thing he did there. Had his foot got underneath the step, it could have been crushed by the weight of the vehicle stuck on that small bump on the ground and he could have been waiting for emergency and for the vehicle to get lifted for hours.
This is bollocks, compare the long wheelbase defender to the Landcruiser and let's see who is King of the Hill or get the short wheelbase to compare with that defender and then we would have a good comparison. Comfort and styling and safety and both the Landcruiser and the Shogun would run circles around the Defender. I understand its British patriotism that keeps the bias towards the Defender.
landcruiser and shogun look ugly and cheap. You want comfort go drive on the road. Its not bias. its simplicity and history. Its an icon. With a landrover you don't mind getting it scratched up or dented. The other two are far too 'pretty'
Piss off you arrogant pom
the defender is cheaper, too. can't compare the cars, a wrangler is more a defenders competition. these are alternatives, not realistically comparing them. A reason they might not have chosen a jeep is because sales of jeep in the UK are quite frankly awful.
the discovery is more the land cruiser and shotguns completion and price, so please don't get in snuff a hissy
Land Cruiser and Shogun are not offroad cars.......
I bet you own a Land Cruiser lol
Land Rover is the King? well maybe ther in the you UK, where ther's real offroding and overlanding nobody usese a defender... they uses the toyota or the mitsubishi and maybe a patrol... dont get me wrong I love the defender mainly because of its looks, but it is a serously underpowerd veicle and just too hard for overlanding... really don't know where do you come with the idea that a car wich is a copy of the old wlly's is the best 4x4... this loked more like publicity than a fare comparacing...
Then buy something like the Freelander and fir it with off road kit and you have something with the off road capabilities of a defender but the power of a small discovery..
and where there is mud, nobody uses a land cruiser because they rust like mad
Patrick Catana Gnudi i have both the Land cruiser200 and the Nissan Patrol Y62..
And to be honest i prefer the mighty Patrol..
@@wesammansour1486 yes because the patrol has more power than the land cruiser
I would imagine the 70 series LC would be a more direct competitor here instead of a Prado. 1min20s in shows the defenders achilles heel: going down hill. That was bordering on out of control. I would have preferred a HDC or better yet a large bore diesel with loads of compression on low 1st to easily make a controlled decent. Even the LC's ancient 1Hz engine is a marvel in that type of terrain.
Tom Rodgers Yeah, i have no idea what he did there, probably clutched in... normally the engine would brake for you down a hill, especially in low range.
I do however wonder why the terrain response system from the LR3/LR4 does not make it into the defender, that would make what is already one of the best off-roaders, truly unstoppable.
I honestly haven't looked in to this! TO THE INTERNET!
I have a 1989... pre-defender... 90, with a 300 TDi engine swap and other mods that i don't have time to list, but it really works... some of the time. lol
Not the cars fault, i'm just constantly messing with it.
FullMetal Alex, it was most probably a case of a journalist not knowing how to operate the vehicle properly, but i do recall this not being an issue in older defenders but more on the newer ones. As always Skill > Gear.
+Tom Rodgers i must admit i find the engine breaking in the transit engined defenders to suck. 1st is to low and 2nd is to high. something about the engine isn't smooth on over run so it can cause a grabbing action at the wheels. the older engines were much smoother and better setup for offroad i think.
Unfair to the shogun! Is long wheel base !
Typical housewife testing !! Unwatchable.....
For many the Jeep Wrangler is the king of the hill and have already replaced the landrover Defender longtime ago, did You not know that???. The Wrangler is a more modern vehicle that is also great for normal commuting (daily driving) and with the 3.6 Petrol it acc in about 0-100km/h 6.5-8.5 seconds, thats similar to the old american muscle cars with V8 engines.
Birdphotoman44 Yeah, but this is off roading... not 0-100 in blah blah blah seconds. show a Jeep a muddy path and its fooked, doesn't even need to drive on to it :P
Birdphotoman44 The Defender is solid, but you're right it hasn't received much needed updates in a long time. The Euro Wrangler with the 2.8L CRD would've been a better direct comparison (though I prefer the 3.6L) than these two options in the video. Add the LandCruiser 70 (anniversary edition) or Nissan Patrol and you'd have a good all-around comparison. The models used in this video are more dirt-roaders than off-roaders, comparable to the Land Rover's more comfy segment, not the more basic and off-road centric Defender.
Considering this video didn't really get into very Challenging off-roading, and more just steep & deep mud perhaps those were the right choice for the course, but there are far better "Proper 4x4s" out there as the title of the video suggests are the focus/quest.
The only problem is that ALL of the good contenders/pretenders to the throne are being withdrawn or significantly changed, so there isn't a 'long-term' possibility out there with the Wrangler being updated, and the Toyota and Nissan potentially getting major redesigns too. Putting that 5.0L Cummins in a Patrol would be very nice, and if they don't muck-up the Wrangler redesign, a 3.0L EcoDiesel would be sweet there too.
KnightShadey This channel is from UK and they dont sell Landrcruiser 70 series or Nissan Patrol anymore in Europe so they could not test them but they totally missed that they have Wrangler in UK.
KnightShadey Here is a comparisson between Defender, Landcruiser and Wrangler www.chryslergroup.co.za/jeep/interwoven/downloads/media/ShootOutOfTheLegends.pdf
Birdphotoman44 Interesting comparison. It is the old 3.8L engine and 4-speed in the Jeep, and the I6 Diesel in the Toyota, so neither is t it's best, but still and interesting comparison.
Comparison were not made for the same tiers type, wheel size, and ground Clearance!!!! Is like comparing oranges and bananas!!!!
damn..all cause of tires and clearance? so Mitsubishi lost? What if it was higher and had better tires? How would it compete?
Should have used a disco 3, that's comparable to the other 2. Not that shite 90!
Land rover is nothing compared to the land cruiser. Doesn't matter what your test say, or any amount of editing you can muster to promote your land rover.
that is not even a land cruiser, that is the smaller and cheaper version. toyota prado
+Hawj Tsaab Landrover has much better iconic,
memorial looks than that boring land cruiser which is just the same as all the other 1000's of SUVs
+COGS CHANNEL when buying a Land Rover it should come equipped with a mechanic lol
guy proulx You got me there
I thought that came as an add-on feature.
Why on Earth you compare Defender to Land Cruiser or Pajero? Where the is Wrangler? Put Defender against Wrangler and then you will see the answer.
Visit the site "destroy my jeep" and all your self deluded invincibility will vanish like a Chrysler dealer when you try to claim on warranty.
to bring an old video back from the dead... I'm almost positive my 2003 Montero Limited Could have made that course just like the other two cars. I've taken mine up way worse inclines, just got to know how to drive the thing so you don't beach yourself.
I own a Defender 300tdi with diff locks and a Toyota Landcruiser J100 can beat his ass any day of the week. British stupid humor... * King of my as** *
You should remove this video and redo another one with same Short Wheel Base platform, same tire type and thickness for both Prado and Shogun Pajero. Then you will know who is the Real Winner of 4x4!
This is absolute nonsense!
Let's get a short wheel base car and put off road tyres on and say tyres are important.
Then we will put it against 2 long wheel base cars with road tyres.
Let's not blame the cars hear but the bafoons who decided to do this.
Why no Discovery?
Nope i feel sorry for you the "king of the hill " in your dream the land cruiser did the same challenge as well as the defender so the comparison is pointless you need to do some serious off-road stuff to show us how those 4x4 systems works it's a shame because it's a land rover it's a kind of the hill wtf!!!!!
I can't believe i waste five minutes to watch this ridiculous, unfair, unprofessional comparison, i mean, seriouly, in reality, instead of just pushing throttle, there are millions of ways to get rid of the dilemma these two guys were in, and all they do is just keeping push it. These are off-road cars, not stupid-bollocks vehicles. I like Defender, but WTF is this? This is an indignity. Either the Mitsuishi guys were short-cutted or you are making this up, I can think of no reason that they would allow this happening.
what kind of difference are those, you can't compare defender with those long version of pajero or toyota, you have to use short pajero and normal land cruiser.
That's all
Not fair guys...you compared a short wheel base to long wheel bases..
You bring out your long wheel based landrover and we see how good it is compared to the real king of the hill..the LC
queridos amigos , en este vídeo sólo veo intención de mala publicidad para la mitsubishi pues sólo ahí que fijarse en la diferencias en los neumáticos de la toyota y la mitsubishi las ruedas k tiene la montero del vídeo no son ni siquiera los que trae de fábrica y no sólo eso le colocaron unos neumaticos. más de tipo carretera que de todo camino. como son las k trae en realidad de fábrica. y en cambio fijense en los neumáticos de la toyota se la pusieron más tipo todo terreno de las que en realidad trae en verdad. que descaro.. M.A.M.A.G.U.E.V.O
The Brits are sooooo bias when it comes to Land Rover, well without getting into details..
1. The Land Crosier you're showing here shall be compared with the Landrover Discovery. Toyota has other models, e.g. land cruiser J79, that you shall compare with the Defender.. You need to learn more about the market mate!
2. You also need to learn how to drive a Mitsubishi !!
3. The audience nowadays are not as fool as might think!!
4. Defender has proven its failure since 2015 :)
I think, every "offroader" is a king in his own "kingdom". It depends what ever we compare and what everyone of us feel as most important. Comparance is hardly possible to judge generally... For example: I have Defender 110 TD5 and I can't compare with some supercharged Land Cruiser in some "sand hill climbing". But when I was on races in wood, I was able to control the thin cab of Defender so nicely between trees like no other "muscle cars", which there simply can't go thru and were stuck and some of them were leaning against a tree... Sometimes You need heavy truck and big power, sometimes You need lighter and thinner car... Noone can have everything...
But I use the car also for sleeping, inside is place for 145 x 200 cm 10 cm thick matrace and we sleep there with my girlfriend as at home in bedroom. AND, you can still sit inside car on that matrace, it's very pleasant when camping and outside is rainy... How you can manage in new Toyota for example... Will you drill the interier for attaching the stuff inside the car? How much you will pay for special holder for that and that in luxury cars? Or, I was able to move whole household of me or friends many times with ease, cause when you clear the interier out off the seats, its very big room inside. Try it with "electrified and motorized" seats of contemporary luxury offroaders... And I'm still speaking about offroader, cause I had such situation, when with this fully loaded Defender I needed to step on quite high pavement just between other cars parked there. Impossible with the common vans... So just engaged lo gear and nicely done... And I can say next and next uniq situation, where Defender rock. But it's my needs what I want from offroader. Someone needs to go quickly on higway, it's OK, it's his "king of the offroaders", that's all. Mine is Defender... All offroader can be friends, isn't it so?... I like, when we regard with Toyota's drivers. Not often, but sometimes, and it very nice...
I'd say the Patrol or G-wagon is a better candidate than the Pajero, the pajero has lost about half it's ground clearance over the years. I no longer concider it an offroader.
Try putting the land rover with its true competitors.. i.e Land Cruiser 76.. 79.. 78.. those are the ones its actually meant to rival. Not a poor mitsubishi or a Luxury Prado. Even though they're still very good for what they're designed to do.. which is go off road and take you to a formal event. Unlike the land rover which has one purpose, that is, farm work or exploring..
At the end the Land rover is good, but your getting confused with who is supposed to rival who here. And who is designed for what.
Absolutely stupid comparison!
I can't imagine one who buy Defender as everyday car! Also, they took short wheel based defender with off-road tires against "long" version cars with regular tires!!!
Brits are so british....
reading all these comments,and I guess I'm a little different .I have something low cost basic and pretty much runs like a tank,a very capable vehicle, a 1991 Isuzu Trooper LS.
3 minutes of my life that will never come back, really one of the worst "reviews" i"ve seen..
Mitsubishi shogun is way better than Land Rover 100% and plus the test was unfair cause the Mitsubishi did not have proper off road Tyers! I've seen bigger Tyers for this car for goodness sake... They are road Tyers not off road Tyers.
silly video, if you wanna compare luxury cars then trow in the range sport with air suspention or a mercedes G and a jeep wrangler
Proved nothing. Could have arrived at those conclusions at your desk with a ruler.
Didn't faze the Defender or the Land Cruiser on a very basic course. On standard tyres an Evoque would have had no trouble with anything other than ground clearance.
Clearly these two have no understanding of the word 'challenging'.
I've never quite understood comparisons like this. Why not compare a defender 110 and a 70 series land cruiser. That's a far closer comparison. Not sure why the Pajero was in there. At least there wasent a jeep.
All you had to do with the mitsubishi is put something under the back wheels and it wdve gone over that hump.shoguns are excellent offroaders
1. It is not a Land Cruiser, it is a Prado
2. why they use proper wheel on Mitzu and Prado. Meanwhile the rover use off road wheels
3. why comparing three car which all of them are on different class
For the money . You cannot beat a shogun.
land cruiser is the ugliest suv ever
jay hern And you are blind as fuck.
jay hern Its not a SUV. S= Sedan, U= Utility and these two do NOT fit into the Sports or Utility version
at 2:45 was I the only one hurt by the screeching sound of those brambles on the Land Cruiser ? Ouch ! It's a 70K€ car guys lol...
I'm sorry but neither you or the "expert" cannot drive off-road. This hill proved it clearly 3:45. A bit more speed or lower tire pressure would do
can I say you where throwing the defender around a bit more violently than the other two and if the other two where long wheel Base you could have gotten the 110
Complete waist of time, SWB vs LWB, bad driver as well as that is only the Prado not the full land cruiser which would walk that test and more
FFS I'm sick of these idiots calling the Toyota Prado the Toyota land cruiser. They are completely different cars!
Utterly ridiculous review. These guys are numpties. A Defender is not comparable to the other two. The Mitsubishi was on road tyres.
Why the fuck does the Land Cruiser have a red nose at the front? This is like one of those car reviews by 5-year olds finishing kindergarten.
the stupid test I ve ever watched, short Defender compared to long ones; who decided to leave road wheels on Pajero, guys r u competent???
Been round this course when i lived in Kent in a swb shogun 05plate not a problem
Short wheelbase is better at not getting beached.
Water is wet. More news at 11.
Next week's episode: Why oranges are better than apples.
Quality report by getting wrong cars to compare and don't know how to drive, exactly why the channel is dead now.
the Mitsubishi suv they have put low profile tires and the other suvs they had put normal tires look carefully they had tiring to motivate the land causer..
What a shitty comparison? With 5 minutes video, some Brits want to say this British car is the best in the universe? I am laughing.
I would pick the defender anytime of the year.
this is shit the mitsubishi pajero or here in the video shugun it is the best 4×4 edge car in the middle east even the toyota prado cant be the much of power in compare with the pajero and the defender ..
Defender is the KING of British Hill, Land Cruiser is the king of African Off Road
Unfair to compare the Mitsubishi lije that. They are very capable 4WD's.
Next time put slicks on the Pajero, see if it's gonna do better in mud. Squares.
Why not play on even filled use the 110 defender against the long wheelbase Shogun and land cruiser
The wrong car is being retired in this video. Should be that shame of a 4x4 Pajero.
Oh shit , my 1996 Toyota 4runner would eat that Pajero in every respect.
thats a toyota prado, not the land cruiser. and the pajero is not an off roader
great cars toyotas.....
Thats not a fair comparison get better tires and get a standard suspension for the prado or put both the same lift in both suvs
Land Rover is the King
Why is Land Rover short base but Mitsubishi and Toyota long wheel base?
you kidding me. try a g class from mercedes or a range rover or a wrangler. these are off road cars not yours
Wonder if the short wheel base would have grounded,, doubt it!
This review is not honest, profile tires have less Pajero + mud tires on Toyota
Road tyres for the pajero !
I have bad news for you guys, the Jeep is not only the king of the hill but the best 4x4 offroad in the world.
+Reg Bell lol
Even someone high on crack cocaine wouldn't swallow that load of tripe. The only reason people buy Jeep is because they;
A: They are fascinated by fire.
B: Love tow trucks.
C: Have little or no higher brain function.
+prometheus1018 So basically, every American lol
Jeep? Best 4x4? What type of drug do you take pal? I wanna make sure I stay away from your drug. Lol
lol
Stupid comparison; short wheel base vs lingwheel base.