I think the Mk83 is more slick than the SAMP250, so I would aim a bit low with Mk83s. Good video! Manual bombing is always more fun. I hope we get more of the Cyrano IV modes added. One of the unmodeled modes is air-to-ground ranging. Among others such as terrain avoidance.
@@NovaTrap1312 yes, though its been suggested that the F1CE/EE didn't have these modes, because Spain cheaped out. Also, the Mig-21 radar even in locked beam mode is a bit broken. But this is why we need stand-ins, models dubbed "not fully accurate/we know it worked sort of like this in this model", ie give us a fake "F1CT" with all the A2G modes, just using the CE or EE cockpit. The F1CT/CR had an upgraded radar, laser range finder, and bombing computers that gave "CCIP"/A-4 style bombing. There were also other countries that had upgraded models that were similar. Let the mission makers decide if it is accurate enough to be a close enough representation. The F1M could/would be a close stand in, however it is unlikely this model will be acceptable on several servers that use older aircraft (ie Enigma's Cold War) due to the other features it has and the fact that it is a very late 90's upgrade.
@@Munky332I agree wholeheartedly. Give us more tools. I was shocked when I learned the F1 had no computer bombing, it has been used as a strike aircraft so much across history, it just fits the bill so well. Oh well
I think the Mk83 is more slick than the SAMP250, so I would aim a bit low with Mk83s. Good video! Manual bombing is always more fun.
I hope we get more of the Cyrano IV modes added. One of the unmodeled modes is air-to-ground ranging. Among others such as terrain avoidance.
I am not used to Radar modes but what would "Air-to-ground ranging" do or assist with?
@@mrshar1000tells you how far from your designated target that you are as you're dive bombing
@@Big_Red_DorkLike the Mig21 Radar when you put it into the focused beam mode?
@@NovaTrap1312 yes, though its been suggested that the F1CE/EE didn't have these modes, because Spain cheaped out. Also, the Mig-21 radar even in locked beam mode is a bit broken.
But this is why we need stand-ins, models dubbed "not fully accurate/we know it worked sort of like this in this model", ie give us a fake "F1CT" with all the A2G modes, just using the CE or EE cockpit.
The F1CT/CR had an upgraded radar, laser range finder, and bombing computers that gave "CCIP"/A-4 style bombing. There were also other countries that had upgraded models that were similar. Let the mission makers decide if it is accurate enough to be a close enough representation.
The F1M could/would be a close stand in, however it is unlikely this model will be acceptable on several servers that use older aircraft (ie Enigma's Cold War) due to the other features it has and the fact that it is a very late 90's upgrade.
@@Munky332I agree wholeheartedly. Give us more tools. I was shocked when I learned the F1 had no computer bombing, it has been used as a strike aircraft so much across history, it just fits the bill so well.
Oh well