Sorry, he is on about this track which had some copyright issues, I would never give a track out unless it was already a free download! Support the artist th-cam.com/video/QC6WzxBt-R8/w-d-xo.html
Weird comment, well this music is more like tools meant to be mixed with other stuff, iif you like a part then keep that one and edit it on the fly, something very common in djing, I actually think is great, a LOT of dance music nowadays is not composed as a single journey or "complete piece" but as a piece meant to be put together along with other stuff in a mixed set, this one actually has a lot of narrative, there's stuff that barely has any development.
@@armandogavilan1815 I disagree, i see songs as standalone concepts. Theres a lot of house songs that have proper endings (i can give you links if you want), for me the lack of it ruins the whole. These songs have interesing vintage melodies but in my view it requires better work/polishing..
@@maziusclavo8021 well one thing is certain, either one likes the tune or not, and that's fine of course. The concept of "tools" is relatively new in music, even in electronic dance music, back in the day your disco, italo or early house tune was a complete "tale" so to speak, with proper intro, development and conclusion, and I sure like those kinds of tunes, I collect them since decades. Then the minimal trends came, and affected most genres, now djs can really be picky about which part of the tune they need/want (arguably that also could be done before but with minimal/loopy styles is far easier). You check mix by Jeff Mills for example and he may use 2-3 mins from the tune. When I'm on a minimal binge, I don't even listen the whole tune (unless I end up really loving it, if that's the case I will actually put it on repeat) I just skip & skip, after all, if I don't like the bassline, the chances I keep the tune are almost zero. Some producers intentionally make loopy tools just for the sake to be mixed with other tune if the situation calls for it, I do love some good tools mixed with"whole tunes" to add variety. Some loops are so tight and addictive they deserve their own highlight and some "ok" tunes have a 30sec pr whatever loop that is worthy to be rescued and extended to be used on a mix!
@@armandogavilan1815 tools are recent? No way! Bangalter / Dave Clarke / Mills himself as you mentioned all have been using tools produced by their contemporary colleagues since their early days, anyway i do agree with you i also like mixing "whole" tracks with tools or locked grooves
![Rob Mello - The Things You're Doing (Vocal) [Disco 45 2010]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WSIIEDjQudA/mqdefault.jpg)
![Housey Doingz - Curly Wurly [Wiggle, 1996]](/img/n.gif)
✨
Mad stuff 🔥👌
any link to buy? sickkk stuff
www.redeyerecords.co.uk/vinyl/151438-def005-d-fferent-place-d-fferent-place-005
Огонь
Yo, you ever gonna reupload that song?
Email me and I will email the track to you, it’s got a copyright on it
Can I get this too?
@@conorvincent can you also email me the track ?
Sorry, he is on about this track which had some copyright issues, I would never give a track out unless it was already a free download! Support the artist
th-cam.com/video/QC6WzxBt-R8/w-d-xo.html
🥷🏿
A few of their tracks are great (others interesting) but i dont like the endings, it could be better
I don’t know what they could of done to make the ending better, it’s a simple mix to mix something else in
Weird comment, well this music is more like tools meant to be mixed with other stuff, iif you like a part then keep that one and edit it on the fly, something very common in djing, I actually think is great, a LOT of dance music nowadays is not composed as a single journey or "complete piece" but as a piece meant to be put together along with other stuff in a mixed set, this one actually has a lot of narrative, there's stuff that barely has any development.
@@armandogavilan1815 I disagree, i see songs as standalone concepts. Theres a lot of house songs that have proper endings (i can give you links if you want), for me the lack of it ruins the whole. These songs have interesing vintage melodies but in my view it requires better work/polishing..
@@maziusclavo8021 well one thing is certain, either one likes the tune or not, and that's fine of course. The concept of "tools" is relatively new in music, even in electronic dance music, back in the day your disco, italo or early house tune was a complete "tale" so to speak, with proper intro, development and conclusion, and I sure like those kinds of tunes, I collect them since decades. Then the minimal trends came, and affected most genres, now djs can really be picky about which part of the tune they need/want (arguably that also could be done before but with minimal/loopy styles is far easier). You check mix by Jeff Mills for example and he may use 2-3 mins from the tune. When I'm on a minimal binge, I don't even listen the whole tune (unless I end up really loving it, if that's the case I will actually put it on repeat) I just skip & skip, after all, if I don't like the bassline, the chances I keep the tune are almost zero. Some producers intentionally make loopy tools just for the sake to be mixed with other tune if the situation calls for it, I do love some good tools mixed with"whole tunes" to add variety. Some loops are so tight and addictive they deserve their own highlight and some "ok" tunes have a 30sec pr whatever loop that is worthy to be rescued and extended to be used on a mix!
@@armandogavilan1815 tools are recent? No way! Bangalter / Dave Clarke / Mills himself as you mentioned all have been using tools produced by their contemporary colleagues since their early days, anyway i do agree with you i also like mixing "whole" tracks with tools or locked grooves