Thank you, Hina! I appreciate it. Yes, I will be eventually looking to add case-based discussions. I think that I do need a live streaming capability to achieve it, which currently I do not. Thank you, for the feedback!
Thank you Dr. Shah. The approach to mimickers is great. Very nice point abt the IHC. I use PIN4 quite a lot esp because we can see basal cells +/- and cancer cells -/+ in the same gland. At 14:46, the fact that is intriguing me is: the small round glands in question (left side) are AMACR pos but basal marker neg(not even a patchy stain), the b9 looking glands on the right are showing the reverse. I would have thought of a small focus of ASAP here..is this a pitfall ? Does the weak AMACR staining favour a b9 dx? Thank you.
As long as glands which are staining with basal cells and glands which are not staining for basal cells do not look different in their cytoplasmic and cytological characteristics, I would consider that as a part of same focus and would interpret as a benign
I feel this talk is incorrectly titled as for "...dummies" which is misleading. I suggest it be changed to incorporate the characterization that it is for inquiring minds.
Crisp and clear presentation. Useful tips given for routine use. Thanks a lot Dr. Rajal Shah Sir
Thank you, Manoj for providing valuable feedback! I appreciate it
Thanks a lot sir. You have cleared up a lot of confusions during this presentation.
Your videos are priceless.
thank you very much for these explanations.
i appreciate your great efforts
Thank you, Shadan!
Thanks once again, wonderful and clear presentation Sir
Thanks Venkatesh!
I learn a lot from your videos.thank you
Thank you, malini! Appreciate your feedback! Please do let your colleagues and friends about this resource. It will help building it bigger
thanks a lot, that is really helpful.
Good precise discussion. If possible also make some actual slide discussion videos like some other youtube links like pathcast..
Thank you, Hina! I appreciate it. Yes, I will be eventually looking to add case-based discussions. I think that I do need a live streaming capability to achieve it, which currently I do not. Thank you, for the feedback!
Hi Hina! I uploaded a new video using a case based discussion. Please let me know your feedback. Thanks.
Thank you Dr. Shah. The approach to mimickers is great. Very nice point abt the IHC. I use PIN4 quite a lot esp because we can see basal cells +/- and cancer cells -/+ in the same gland. At 14:46, the fact that is intriguing me is: the small round glands in question (left side) are AMACR pos but basal marker neg(not even a patchy stain), the b9 looking glands on the right are showing the reverse. I would have thought of a small focus of ASAP here..is this a pitfall ? Does the weak AMACR staining favour a b9 dx? Thank you.
As long as glands which are staining with basal cells and glands which are not staining for basal cells do not look different in their cytoplasmic and cytological characteristics, I would consider that as a part of same focus and would interpret as a benign
@@rajalbshahExperturologicpath Thank you! yes you hv mentioned it in the Take Home slide also...:)
what is the name of your book sir
Interpretation of prostate needle, biopsies: An illustrated guide
I feel this talk is incorrectly titled as for "...dummies" which is misleading. I suggest it be changed to incorporate the characterization that it is for inquiring minds.