Thanks for the honest review. I think you can be honest and still respect the company that sent them. People will still purchase them if they want an anamorphic look. It's a good way to get into anamorphic without purchasing a really expensive lens for a mirrorless camera, or one that has no autofocus.
Thank you for this video, very informative. I found your video looking to record concert as an audience with considerable distance from the stage; is there a zoom lens that can be use for this?
@@Gemini_Connect i saw your video gopro 12 can do 4:3 aspect ratio while dji 4 can do 16:9. how to make it 16:9 and enable full potential for gopro 12?? and how is the photo quality of dji 4 with the 16:9 aspect ratio compared to iphone15
Best to shoot in “cinematic” settings with the shutter speed double the frame rate. Will need to watch the exposure/brightness levels and possibly make adjustments.
Its Cool Mam...thanks for this great review of the Freewell lenses and filters for the DJI Osmo Pocket 3! I love that you can stack the filters and lenses together. That seems like a huge advantage over the official DJI product. I was wondering if you could talk a bit more about the image quality.
I still hate the focusing with this camera. When on continuous focus i can decide what to focus on, foreground or background, resulting in it continually focusing/refocusing, making the footage useless. An example. If I'm i the distance and walking toward and past the camera, as i approach the camera and then past it, it is constantly focusing and refocusing. I don't always want to use active trac k as i don'tt always want the gimbal to move. i just want a still shot with myself moving in and out of frame. Any ideas? Also, the change from blur to focused, or vice versa, is WAAAAAAAY to snappy and needs to be MUCH smoother. My old Samsung s20 does a better job! Otherwise, great camera!
@@lonniesfilmmaking333 but single focus only focuses on one spot so I would go out of focus once I've walked past that focused point. Centre focus? Where's that?
@@whatsnottohike try tap in the background while in single focus, then walk into the scene to see if it focuses on you, and keeps focusing on you You've got to experiment more It's the only way to learn It's what I do every single day, even while sitting in my taxi
May I quote a person from reddit: "When 24fps was adopted as the 'standard' it was the slowest frame rate that cinematographers could use and still look somewhat acceptable. It was the BARE MINIMUM and was used to save money on film which was extremely expensive. There is absolutely no reason to use it today other than because people think it looks more 'cinematic' because it's the framerate that movies are shot in. It's ridiculous. "
But is it from a redditor who is an amateur filmmaker, industry filmmaker, or just some rando's personal opinion? (Not arguing with the logic of the opinion, but want to know the source since "a person from reddit" does not indicate any level of credibility)
Thanks for the video. Unfortunately the wide angle gives distortion not only in the sides but also up and down. Has a little of fisheye effect. The wide angle is not an aspherical lens. Not good for Real Estate vídeos. I don’t understand why Freewell didn’t make this wide lens like they did for the dji pocket 2 with no distortion and actually was wider
Hey, To clarify, Freewell already produces smartphone lenses with a 1.55x anamorphic ratio, so it's not a limitation on our end. Instead, the choice of 1.1x anamorphic for Pocket 3 is due to the camera's limitation. The Pocket 3 can't handle 1.33x or 1.55x lenses. Our goal is to provide buyers with a functional solution rather than nothing at all. Considering the price, quality, and performance, this lens offers great value in the overall bundle beating any other options available on the market. Thanks
I know this video is about filters but I really want DJI to do something about their long exposure shooting both on video and on photos. This is a 1 inch sensor we should be able to shoot with exposure longer than 1sec. I think this is a missed opportunity.
Thanks for the honest review. I think you can be honest and still respect the company that sent them. People will still purchase them if they want an anamorphic look. It's a good way to get into anamorphic without purchasing a really expensive lens for a mirrorless camera, or one that has no autofocus.
Do you need to use the macro + anamorphic to use the anamorphic lens?
Nope, the anamorphic can be used on its own.
Thank you for this video, very informative. I found your video looking to record concert as an audience with considerable distance from the stage; is there a zoom lens that can be use for this?
I don’t know of a zoom lens, but there is a zoom feature on the camera
@@Gemini_Connect Thank you.
Thanks Suzi! I love my Dji pocket 3 also!
mam what action waterproof camera do you recommend for photography??
Hmm…I primarily use action cameras for video. But I think GoPro offers more flexibility in terms of photo settings.
@@Gemini_Connect i saw your video gopro 12 can do 4:3 aspect ratio while dji 4 can do 16:9. how to make it 16:9 and enable full potential for gopro 12?? and how is the photo quality of dji 4 with the 16:9 aspect ratio compared to iphone15
Are these better than official lenses
Well, there is not an official DJI macro or anamorphic lens…
Great job, just what I was looking for and a little more!👍
Any settings needed to change when using nd on pocket 3?
Best to shoot in “cinematic” settings with the shutter speed double the frame rate. Will need to watch the exposure/brightness levels and possibly make adjustments.
Thank you I always like your videos. They are very informative.
Its Cool Mam...thanks for this great review of the Freewell lenses and filters for the DJI Osmo Pocket 3! I love that you can stack the filters and lenses together. That seems like a huge advantage over the official DJI product. I was wondering if you could talk a bit more about the image quality.
I thought the image quality looked really great - on par with what you get using DJI filters.
@@Gemini_Connect ya its good mam
Cheers so much, agree a bit pricey plus unusual the nd lenses don't fit properly 😊❤
I still hate the focusing with this camera. When on continuous focus i can decide what to focus on, foreground or background, resulting in it continually focusing/refocusing, making the footage useless. An example. If I'm i the distance and walking toward and past the camera, as i approach the camera and then past it, it is constantly focusing and refocusing. I don't always want to use active trac k as i don'tt always want the gimbal to move. i just want a still shot with myself moving in and out of frame. Any ideas? Also, the change from blur to focused, or vice versa, is WAAAAAAAY to snappy and needs to be MUCH smoother. My old Samsung s20 does a better job! Otherwise, great camera!
Single or centre focus
@@lonniesfilmmaking333 but single focus only focuses on one spot so I would go out of focus once I've walked past that focused point. Centre focus? Where's that?
@whatsnottohike maybe, and in the focus settings I guess, I don't have it
@@whatsnottohike try tap in the background while in single focus, then walk into the scene to see if it focuses on you, and keeps focusing on you
You've got to experiment more
It's the only way to learn
It's what I do every single day, even while sitting in my taxi
May I quote a person from reddit:
"When 24fps was adopted as the 'standard' it was the slowest frame rate that cinematographers could use and still look somewhat acceptable. It was the BARE MINIMUM and was used to save money on film which was extremely expensive. There is absolutely no reason to use it today other than because people think it looks more 'cinematic' because it's the framerate that movies are shot in. It's ridiculous. "
But is it from a redditor who is an amateur filmmaker, industry filmmaker, or just some rando's personal opinion? (Not arguing with the logic of the opinion, but want to know the source since "a person from reddit" does not indicate any level of credibility)
Thanks for the video. Unfortunately the wide angle gives distortion not only in the sides but also up and down. Has a little of fisheye effect. The wide angle is not an aspherical lens. Not good for Real Estate vídeos. I don’t understand why Freewell didn’t make this wide lens like they did for the dji pocket 2 with no distortion and actually was wider
Yes 😮❤
1.1? Wth😂
Hey,
To clarify, Freewell already produces smartphone lenses with a 1.55x anamorphic ratio, so it's not a limitation on our end. Instead, the choice of 1.1x anamorphic for Pocket 3 is due to the camera's limitation. The Pocket 3 can't handle 1.33x or 1.55x lenses.
Our goal is to provide buyers with a functional solution rather than nothing at all. Considering the price, quality, and performance, this lens offers great value in the overall bundle beating any other options available on the market.
Thanks
I know this video is about filters but I really want DJI to do something about their long exposure shooting both on video and on photos. This is a 1 inch sensor we should be able to shoot with exposure longer than 1sec. I think this is a missed opportunity.