i tried this deck and used sprints instead of auctioneers and it's been really successful for me, even more so than with the auctioneers since this deck isn't as spell heavy as other rogue decks like miracle or malygos and relies on value xD
I agree. I run a golden 1 and love pulling aya or even jade swarmer from it. The fact that you can also just hit standalone threats like tomb pillager and anubarak that have synergy with your n'zoth makes it a good card to have but there's just not enough space to justify fitting 2 in.
Reno is only good vs zoo and aggro where your opponent plays their whole hand. It's also good in fatigue, sometimes. But it's not very good in the current meta.
The whole point are the golems. Aside from tomb pillager, N'zoth only brings back the jade golem deathrattles so he's not a late game threat in the traditional sense but in the sense that N'zoth brings the possible golem count up by a possibility of 3 without brann. I wouldnt say he's a "must have" but the deck isnt as optimal without Brann/n'zoth whose purpose in this deck is to increase the max golem possibility.
you can play 2 burglar, 2 mistress, si7 agent, 1 argus shadow strike in place preparation, van cleef and auctioneer. mistress work really good with raptor and n'zoth.
80% of decks are auto lose vs pirate face warrior. I hate the HS devs they don't learn and just keep printing crazy OP 1 drops. like small time buccaneer and patches this expansion.
no point to cut important cards to improve one spicific mu, bcs it makes your other way worse (reno). id say cut thalnos, jade spirit and huckster for either the pirate package or like already mentioned mistress and argus. Van cleef with prep / backstab and coin can win on its own vs pirate warrior. just make it huuuuge and as early as possible they cant handle it or it saves you important damage
"I have no 1 drops in this deck" (draws a 1 drop)
Classic
Wp Kolento, thaks for the lesson
i tried this deck and used sprints instead of auctioneers and it's been really successful for me, even more so than with the auctioneers since this deck isn't as spell heavy as other rogue decks like miracle or malygos and relies on value xD
2:25 dat misplay doe
Charles Ma wow you are Legend
That bothered me too. That's not even something you have to think about. It's just like which one has more stats? this one? ok.
can you tell if he's picking the 1/5/10 mana spell by the last card that's selected before they flip to picking the first effect?
no
what do you think about using journey with jade rogue? Usually I get something really good for the match (a 2nd aya most of the time)
1 ok but not 2 because you lose in tempo against aggro match up i think.
I agree. I run a golden 1 and love pulling aya or even jade swarmer from it. The fact that you can also just hit standalone threats like tomb pillager and anubarak that have synergy with your n'zoth makes it a good card to have but there's just not enough space to justify fitting 2 in.
what about gang up?
I been playing a somewhat of a smiliar deck and I been getting trashed by pirates and shit.Any ways to counter that?
Reno is only good vs zoo and aggro where your opponent plays their whole hand. It's also good in fatigue, sometimes. But it's not very good in the current meta.
2:25 Misplay ?
mutzikatzi1 Yes.
Sizar Ghassan hahaha
This is the second time u upload this?
Did u won the tournement last weekend?
Hello guys , sup Thijs
Any replacement for N'zoth ?
Aaron6 Milhouse manastorm
not really, nzoth is a must have for this kind of deck, I'd suggest just use whatever you want until you have enough dust to craft him
anub'arak why not or try to find him with journey below
Fandom Trash Kappa not true since n'zoth is late game theat and so are the golems
The whole point are the golems. Aside from tomb pillager, N'zoth only brings back the jade golem deathrattles so he's not a late game threat in the traditional sense but in the sense that N'zoth brings the possible golem count up by a possibility of 3 without brann. I wouldnt say he's a "must have" but the deck isnt as optimal without Brann/n'zoth whose purpose in this deck is to increase the max golem possibility.
Тиххханда, Тиххханда
wooooo
This deck is good, but it just auto-loses to pirate face warrior. I usually just concede after turn 2 when i face them with this deck. Waste of time.
you can play 2 burglar, 2 mistress, si7 agent, 1 argus shadow strike in place preparation, van cleef and auctioneer. mistress work really good with raptor and n'zoth.
in place of prep and auctioneer? rip card draw
80% of decks are auto lose vs pirate face warrior. I hate the HS devs they don't learn and just keep printing crazy OP 1 drops. like small time buccaneer and patches this expansion.
no point to cut important cards to improve one spicific mu, bcs it makes your other way worse (reno). id say cut thalnos, jade spirit and huckster for either the pirate package or like already mentioned mistress and argus. Van cleef with prep / backstab and coin can win on its own vs pirate warrior. just make it huuuuge and as early as possible they cant handle it or it saves you important damage
How about playing pirates for the early game?
Hi bb
first
The deck is interestion, but the guy is annoying.