Is Garry Kasparov the Greatest Attacking Player to Ever Live?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 53

  • @HeWishesForTheClothesOfHeaven
    @HeWishesForTheClothesOfHeaven 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    This is one of my favorite Kasparov attacks as black: absolutely devestating against one of the finest defenders in chess history. Thank you for highlighting the greatest rivalry in chess.

  • @fredflint3998
    @fredflint3998 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Karpov and Kasparov were the ultimate rivals. Two exceptional talents with totally different styles. To me Karpov’s style is very disciplined and precise whereas Kasparov was more abstract and adventurous. I only wish Fischer was still there too at that time.

  • @ianattong6989
    @ianattong6989 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Excellent attacking game by Kasparov !!! Very instructive !! Great commentary as usual !!

  • @eonny
    @eonny 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Good one. Thanks for keeping short and concise.

  • @TraeFittz
    @TraeFittz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazing detail & coverage 👌🏽

  • @banzaiburger
    @banzaiburger 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What a bizarre game this was. Just beyond my comprehension

  • @englishguy9680
    @englishguy9680 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The more I learn about Karpov the more I respect him so the fact that Garry could ein like this with black is very impressive

  • @obinnauwasomba785
    @obinnauwasomba785 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Kasparov in his prime was alekhine 2.0….he could find and play 15 straight only winning move in a game, check out his attack against Topalov in his immortal game.

  • @JBfromFL
    @JBfromFL 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like your videos. Thank you for making them!!! 😮😊😅

  • @MrGyges
    @MrGyges 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent Chess. Thank you.

  • @northshores7319
    @northshores7319 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Kasparov was so very alert to all possible tactical motifs that confirms the saying that the winner sees a move or two better than the loser. Funny tho' how Gary was freaked out by the computer that could see way farther than he could. That was a bit of role reversal for Gary. Good show as always.

    • @keaton718
      @keaton718 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Crazy that today our phones have the compute power to investigate every possible move worth investigating. Chess is basically solved.

    • @bring-out
      @bring-out 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@keaton718 Not really, as AlphaZero showed there may very well be new ideas waiting to be discovered.

    • @keaton718
      @keaton718 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bring-out i have heard of Stockfish pruning trees that have good moves in them, but it can still reliably beat any human.

    • @strategicsage7694
      @strategicsage7694 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@keaton718 I think both statements in your last comment are true. Computers are far better than humans, but they haven't solved chess.

  • @peterquinones3522
    @peterquinones3522 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Surely the most venomous, hate filled rivalry in chess history was between Karpov and Korchnoi.

    • @mavenofmacau6391
      @mavenofmacau6391 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Filthy!

    • @TravelingMooseMedia
      @TravelingMooseMedia 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hate? Also, I highly suggest watching the documentary on karpov life in the original Russian

  • @maddindscheidschei3830
    @maddindscheidschei3830 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could you possibly bring more of that epic battle between Kasparov and Karpov. There was so much tension, and there are some really phantasmic games (on both sides). I think Kasparov is for us western people the more symphatic guy, but both were amazing players, and Karpov - slightly elder - had his time as world champion. Otherwise he would have possibly one of this tragic figures (like Kortschnoi - one more of those Russian with K 🙂) who basically never got world champion because Karpov was there...

  • @DergEnterprises
    @DergEnterprises 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting attacking moves

  • @PT84
    @PT84 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cover some of the candidates matches plz

    • @benjamindillard2391
      @benjamindillard2391 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There are more than enough streamers covering the candidates. What chessdawg does is cover a lot of older, historical games, and we appreciate it from him. Some of us don't wanna be inundated with Hikaru and Fabi games non-stop.

  • @TruthSurge
    @TruthSurge 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    totally off topic but... for laughs, play this at .5 or .25 speed. Drunk chessdawg. HEHEHEH

    • @Habück
      @Habück 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      child ...

    • @TruthSurge
      @TruthSurge 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Habück was that supposed to be an insult?

    • @Habück
      @Habück 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TruthSurge nope, a statement

    • @TruthSurge
      @TruthSurge 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Habück OH.... just a statement. well, for a minute there I thought you were trying to insult me. But I'm into my sixties so if you were trying to say that I'm a child, then allow me to correct your erroneous assumption. Have a great day!

    • @Habück
      @Habück 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TruthSurge ah, a Boomer who just discovered that new mysterious thing called "internetz" ... ok, enjoy!

  • @Mach1Airspace
    @Mach1Airspace 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent.

  • @kummitus838
    @kummitus838 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks 👍

  • @patpowers9210
    @patpowers9210 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Of course, the REAL source of tension between Karpov and Kasparov is that their last names were too similar.

  • @Luckey900
    @Luckey900 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks
    Canada

  • @SwaniZubayeer22
    @SwaniZubayeer22 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A beauty.

  • @xxAutoFlowxx
    @xxAutoFlowxx 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Karpov was in his 40's when he played this game. I think he. In his prime, was better. Look at their first WCM. Karpov was crushing him.

    • @chessdawg
      @chessdawg  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Actually, in fairness to Karpov, the following year he absolutely dominated Linares winning with an unheard of 11/13. He finished well ahead of a field that included a second place Kasparov who had 8.5/13. Perhaps I will cover one of Karpov's games from that legendary tournament to balance things a little bit.

    • @user-ts2co4ov5h
      @user-ts2co4ov5h 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Karpov has won more GM tournaments than anyone in History !

    • @宇宙次佛
      @宇宙次佛 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @7:38 just wondering how about white play RXc2. Thanks!

    • @zazenwind
      @zazenwind 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@宇宙次佛Same here

  • @paulfillingham2958
    @paulfillingham2958 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The greatest attacking player ever was Tal

  • @stevenjohnston2263
    @stevenjohnston2263 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No. That would be Paul Morphy followed by Mikail Tal.

  • @raylopez99
    @raylopez99 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's like music. The music you grew up with is the music you think is the greatest. That said (about music) a study once found in terms of feel good harmony the music of earlier ages was better than later ages, progressively, meaning music from the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s. 00s, 10s, 20s got progressively worse. And I tend to agree, though I don't listen to much music. You notice how Rihanna now is doing country rather than rap because it's trendy? Well country is basically 50s music. As for chess, who's the greatest? Kasparov of course. And you can guess my age by that comment. Peace!

    • @Habück
      @Habück 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rihanna's so called music was always garbage ... no matter which decade.

  • @bennyjet7
    @bennyjet7 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Better to resign then to get smothered with gravy

  • @JimJWalker
    @JimJWalker 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Karpov scored 19 wins, 21 losses, and 104 draws in 144 world championship games. Hardly a domination by Kasparov. Actually, I would say that the 2 win advantage is statistically insignificant.

    • @KeithDonovan-cd3eo
      @KeithDonovan-cd3eo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've been saying that for years plus karpov was 12 years older

    • @femioyekan8184
      @femioyekan8184 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      True, but the goal of matches is to win them, not an exercise in statistics. The fact that they played five and Karpov won zero is significant. And four of those losses came at the start of the 1984 match when Kasparov was adjusting to Karpov's level (no way to practice for that, especially at that time).

    • @BillHimmel
      @BillHimmel 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@femioyekan8184Thx for reminding the Karpov-fanbase that it is wins that count, not statistics!

    • @JimJWalker
      @JimJWalker 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@femioyekan8184 Most don't remember that Kasparov won the 1987 match virtue of a tie, with no tie-break.

    • @strategicsage7694
      @strategicsage7694 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BillHimmel Both count. it's not one or the other. You can hold the reality that the players were extremely close overall as well as the one that Kasparov ultimately was better.

  • @tudvalstone
    @tudvalstone 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hard to get over the fact that Kasparov is a clown.

  • @gmdwill
    @gmdwill 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Garry Kasparov is the Greatest Player to Ever Live