@@rigasrigopoulos6315 because the musicians do not move as they are demon possessed, they do not make frenzy gestures, they are "too" many, too coordinated, not enough scratchy and rough sounding. So I think that they blame Karajan and Richter exactly for being musical. Music should instead sound, according to them, as crazy and noise driven. Searching for the depths of a composition is, therefore, the capital sin in Bach's music.
Super gespieltes konzert der berliner philharmpniker mit herbert von karajan das bach konzert nr 3 in g dur
In der Schweiz ist es üblich, dass man vor und nach dem Konzert plaudert. Manchmal auch während.
I see first time . luzern nice karajan
Super
1:08
❤
erinnerungen der frühen 80er waren rafael kubelik, justus frantz und er
Almeno si poteva caricare tutto, per pochissimi altri 5 o 6 minuti......
What's name this song?
It's the first movement of Bach's Brandenburg Concerto No. 3.
***** Thank you very much! :)
it's better not to comment this
God this is bad. Not as bad as I thought it might be, but still really, really damn bad.
At least it's better than Richter.
Please, as a musician myself I’m curious as to how it’s done. Enlighten us, maestro.
Willi Hansen Why do you consider this bad and why do you consider Richter's version worse? Could you please elaborate?
@@rigasrigopoulos6315 because the musicians do not move as they are demon possessed, they do not make frenzy gestures, they are "too" many, too coordinated, not enough scratchy and rough sounding. So I think that they blame Karajan and Richter exactly for being musical. Music should instead sound, according to them, as crazy and noise driven. Searching for the depths of a composition is, therefore, the capital sin in Bach's music.
@@rigasrigopoulos6315 These "Willi Hansen" and "evskimojo" guys are idiots; there's no need for elaboration.