EPSTEIN-Linked Mar-A-Lago Raid Judge Accused Of Rigging Infamous SWEETHEART DEAL: Tara Palmeri

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
  • Senior political correspondent at Puck News, Tara Palmeri, discusses links between the judge who green-lit the Mar-a-Lago raid, and clients connected to Jeffrey Epstein.
    About Rising:
    Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day's political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day's political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country's most important political newsmakers.
    Follow Rising on social media:
    Website: Hill.TV
    Facebook: HillTVLive/
    Instagram: @HillTVLive
    Twitter: @HillTVLive

ความคิดเห็น • 260

  • @MrSumone
    @MrSumone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    My concern is that they couldn't find a judge NOT LINKED to epstein.

    • @afterthefox
      @afterthefox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      lol...u beat me too it...

    • @l.w.paradis2108
      @l.w.paradis2108 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great point.

    • @l.w.paradis2108
      @l.w.paradis2108 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@afterthefox Good for you. I didn't even think of it. 2022, still naive.

  • @meeok3841
    @meeok3841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    "There's always a Jeffrey Epstein angle. Whenever you talk about the highest echelons of power in our country, there is a Jeffrey Epstein angle... It's almost like no one goes untouched in that story."

    • @billyboy969
      @billyboy969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      True

    • @dustinbaker8272
      @dustinbaker8272 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gotta love this right wing propaganda. Nobody knows who gave the go ahead, what they are looking for, or who even knows, yet Republicans are looking for every angle to poison the well. Its hilarious!

    • @billyboy969
      @billyboy969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dustinbaker8272 agree

    • @tatumgerhardt8200
      @tatumgerhardt8200 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cuz he worked 4 rogue mus..ad...and c..i..a...

    • @RM-cn6yi
      @RM-cn6yi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dems are using the list to blackmail people into doing things they want done

  • @pipkinma
    @pipkinma 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Why is no one talking about Oprah Winfrey's private jet going to Epstein Island 11 times? Where are the missing girls from her school in Africa?

    • @ralphpal
      @ralphpal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is that true or just gossip

  • @aalvarez2914
    @aalvarez2914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    How could a corrupt person like that NOT sign a raid on Trump? All they’d have to tell him is that Trump might have sensitive information on Epstein and that case.

    • @gruelichkulsheim9445
      @gruelichkulsheim9445 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is your evidence that supports the judge is corrupt?

    • @SomeGuy-wv7ng
      @SomeGuy-wv7ng 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gruelichkulsheim9445 Having worked in the courts for a long time, the question is better phrased as "what evidence do you have that this judge is NOT a crazy, corrupt egomaniac?"

    • @gruelichkulsheim9445
      @gruelichkulsheim9445 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SomeGuy-wv7ng my understanding, in the court room, is the prosecution making the claim of "crazy, corrupt egomaniac" has the burden of proof? Are you saying its actually the opposite? that the accused has the burden of proof not the accuser/prosecution?

    • @SomeGuy-wv7ng
      @SomeGuy-wv7ng 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gruelichkulsheim9445 No. I was saying that judges are, as a class, a pretty crazy class of people. Corruption of some kind is, unfortunately, pretty common with them.

    • @lancefulbright2685
      @lancefulbright2685 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gruelichkulsheim9445 he worked for epstein on his island of under age girls

  • @Magic4413
    @Magic4413 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    What they should be asking is why this particular judge signed the warrent, when they weren't tied to a particular jurisdiction & could hv literally used any judge knowing the controversy this judge would cause!

    • @leevy6753
      @leevy6753 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Maybe that's the only judge willing to touch it because he was also compromised??

    • @dustinbaker8272
      @dustinbaker8272 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't know, maybe Trump should read the warrant, which will explain all of that?

    • @lancefulbright2685
      @lancefulbright2685 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dustinbaker8272 trump are trump lawyer still have not seen the sealed warrant garland refused to unseal it

    • @dustinbaker8272
      @dustinbaker8272 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lancefulbright2685 you are talking about the affadavit, not the warrant. The warrant has been unsealed and given to trumps lawyers and made available to the public; the affadavit will not become public until charges are issued since it contains significant pre-emptive information that is evidence for charges.

  • @l.w.paradis2108
    @l.w.paradis2108 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Outstanding reporting. Brilliant.

    • @Silence_Duder_Gooder
      @Silence_Duder_Gooder 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Controlled Opposition is what it is.
      Where is the Clinton part of this story?

    • @jaybourne1185
      @jaybourne1185 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@Silence_Duder_Gooder clinton is always just "coincidence"

  • @antonbakker2475
    @antonbakker2475 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I miss Kim.... Unsubscribing from the channel......

  • @marcschneider2052
    @marcschneider2052 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why would the FBI and the DOJ think that Trump would have Epstein's little black book if they hadn't been friends or spoken for years?

    • @billyboy969
      @billyboy969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not a little black book they are after, thats been on line for years! Video of trump and other powerfull men having s€x with kids is likely - but they arnt going to say that or use it - except behind the publics back!

    • @aalvarez2914
      @aalvarez2914 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He might have information on the Epstein case, which might get into what potential inside information was used to help Epstein avoid federal prosecution and broker immunity for his allies and sweetheart deals the first time. That lawyer had switched sides mid-case from prosecution, joining Epstein’s team the very next day and Epstein ended up with “community service” and some light “mansion house arrest”, for the most part. Under Trump that deal was basically undone by prosecuting him for some of his other countless crimes and victims then. They could have easily just told that judge that Trump might have had sensitive information on how the first Epstein case was handled and brushed over.

    • @billyboy969
      @billyboy969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aalvarez2914 under trump epstein was swacked!

    • @marcschneider2052
      @marcschneider2052 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aalvarez2914 they better have had more than that.

  • @Chris_Patton
    @Chris_Patton 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Robby and Bri could discuss the likelihood that epstein was a professional blackmailer with ties to intelligence and their entire audience would applaud them for it. But they won't. Why?

  • @WhyHandleYouTube
    @WhyHandleYouTube 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is no such thing as "coincidence."

  • @charlesholzschuh5551
    @charlesholzschuh5551 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Every citizen gets one vote but the DOJ decides who governs.

  • @heatherfree5916
    @heatherfree5916 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    That’s the rule for everyday citizens. The person with the most money can win or beat the govt or business.

  • @captaintitusz4761
    @captaintitusz4761 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Where's Kim???

  • @madwhitehatter
    @madwhitehatter 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The question is if they had to shop around to find a shady judge to sign the warrant, or was he just the judge who had that jurisdiction.

  • @Mr626667
    @Mr626667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Make sure you don't leave out Bill Clinton.

  • @tehz4x0r1
    @tehz4x0r1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow they managed to turn 2 Epstein linked people together? How many times did that judge take plain rides with Epstein compared to trump?

    • @billyboy969
      @billyboy969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mabey the put on plays for the public every day for hundreds of years - they seem to be working togather to decive and devide us!

  • @EverettBurger
    @EverettBurger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Was this a bribe? It sounds like a bribe.
    I heard "Take it easy on me and I'll give you a job."

  • @charlesdavis9100
    @charlesdavis9100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Guilty until proven Rich

  • @williamangeles9761
    @williamangeles9761 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That is more than money that was power.

  • @jasseyjefferr7787
    @jasseyjefferr7787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The Hill could take 5 minutes to promote their guests and put a link to their work in the discription

    • @KeefWard
      @KeefWard 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They're bleeding viewers since losing Kim, and showing panic.

  • @Cycoligist313
    @Cycoligist313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The judge donated to Obama also

  • @intelligentone7863
    @intelligentone7863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    They probably made him a offer he couldn't refuse. 😆

  • @Relikson
    @Relikson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It just means the Judge is corrupt, this isnt rocket science.

    • @billyboy969
      @billyboy969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The judge probably is crupt, but that probably does not =what you think it does!

  • @KeefWard
    @KeefWard 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Briahna - "Yeah, yeah, Epstein. But Trump's still guilty of something .. right??"

    • @sguardian870
      @sguardian870 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How dare she remind us that Trump is just like Clinton on the issue? She is so biased

  • @JSRINTX
    @JSRINTX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    All Bri can say is Trump bad to any story.

    • @LS-bs4tx
      @LS-bs4tx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thinking the same thing.

    • @tfromnm6125
      @tfromnm6125 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally ignores accusations towards the other side too.

    • @dissentraleyes
      @dissentraleyes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You guys are literally worse than the Clinton-democrat apologists with the whataboutisms.

    • @JSRINTX
      @JSRINTX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dissentraleyes Why is it wrong to point out the Brianna on every single segment finds a way to work in Trump bad. She will always will be a Bernie Sanders political advocate. No show can claim to be non partisan and hire a political spokesperson for a candidate.

    • @brianbattaglia2187
      @brianbattaglia2187 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JSRINTX that’s the point she’ll never criticize Bernie on anything yet no matter the topic it’s trump bad

  • @trock6921
    @trock6921 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Most likely the judge was told to do so by the intelligence apparatus. Maybe he is a judge that plays ball.

    • @synergyb3926
      @synergyb3926 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Maybe?

    • @dustinbaker8272
      @dustinbaker8272 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe trump can have his lawyer read the warrant, and then you can decide whether the decision was justified.

    • @aalvarez2914
      @aalvarez2914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dustinbaker8272 like they wouldn’t just try to make it look as incriminating as possible, so people like you could say “read it”. No, let’s read the actual sealed warrant, and not the piece of paper they gave Trump to read out loud for show.

    • @dustinbaker8272
      @dustinbaker8272 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aalvarez2914 so you have made up your mind. There is no justification, even though trump could show the official justification, and you arent at all curious what documents they find? I think trump is a criminal, wannabe dictator, but we seem to disagree on that, but you really think trumps exit was so squeaky clean that there isnt the possibility of incriminating evidence?

  • @wallrider73
    @wallrider73 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Tara Palmeri did two excellent podcasts on Epstein (Broken) and the Maxwells (Power). They’re well worth a listen.

  • @patrickmullen2596
    @patrickmullen2596 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great show 👍👍

  • @jr4062
    @jr4062 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    The connection is that this judge is someone that will do what the fbi wants. Cmon, you media know that.

    • @-Thunder
      @-Thunder 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This judge literally was the defense attorney for Epstein's pilot before he was appointed judge. Trump banned Epstein from his resorts. Trump dumped him before Clinton, Gates, Andrew etc. I wish Bri would read the comments.

  • @neiceyd5312
    @neiceyd5312 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Having worked for many years for lawyers... the reason rich defendants hire government lawyers is because of the knowledge that lawyer has about who might be prosecuting and what their processes might be like.

    • @aalvarez2914
      @aalvarez2914 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Imagine if you could just hire the actual government lawyers assisting the prosecution, on your own active case..

    • @steveconrad8857
      @steveconrad8857 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @A Alvarez - the reason that you can’t hire away a prosecutor is because, unless it’s all done with the intelligence community’s approval, the prosecutor would be disbarred. That’s why this prosecutor was rewarded with a judgeship

    • @bastalam
      @bastalam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Basically connection and making deals.

  • @d.c.marsha9027
    @d.c.marsha9027 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    shocker.. there is an Epstein and Clinton/ Obama connection... who could have guessed

    • @sometimesgeorgia8933
      @sometimesgeorgia8933 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Obama what did he do?
      Trump was friends with Epstein and hang out with him?

    • @d.c.marsha9027
      @d.c.marsha9027 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sometimesgeorgia8933 as did Clinton as did Bob Menendez from NJ, Obama knew about the fake Russia collusion, baked Joe B with his money laundering with Hunter. They are all in this together if you don't see that, you're just not looking at the connections

    • @IAintTheDaddyMaury
      @IAintTheDaddyMaury 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What’s his connection with Obama

    • @l.w.paradis2108
      @l.w.paradis2108 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did Obama appoint him magistrate? Source?

  • @marycollins8215
    @marycollins8215 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating

  • @Xuzuluwuku
    @Xuzuluwuku 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's one of the injustices, it's like a disease this country has. Imagine a world, a legal system with true justice...

  • @kylemilligan752
    @kylemilligan752 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    June 2022 Reinhart recused/ removed himself from a trump case because of his lack of impartiality

  • @PV96
    @PV96 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, I did some research on magistrates. 1) they are chosen by the federal judges in that district for mundane, administrative work 2) they are not appointed by the President 3) they do not serve lifetime appointments 4) their terms are usually 4 or 8 years.

  • @ifonlylm
    @ifonlylm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Boycott Rising!! Bring back Kim!!

  • @drummer200000
    @drummer200000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Or maybe he’s just a crooked judge that will do the government’s bidding.

  • @bastalam
    @bastalam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The female host is funny. She wants the same ppl that enabled and participated in protecting epstien to also release(yes they have it) the content of the "black" book.

  • @klemperal
    @klemperal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I thought the connection was that Trump kicked out/banned Epstein from Mar-A-Lago and that the insinuation was that this was payback by the Judge who gave Epstein a sweetheart deal.

    • @aalvarez2914
      @aalvarez2914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, Trump also blew up that sweetheart deal and undid all that hard work. Before Trump came in power, it looked like Epstein was going to get off with a slap on the wrist and some light “mansion house arrest” and “work release”. Leaving mid-case to help a person like Epstein beat your own case seems like a corrupt move. How was this guy promoted to federal magistrate, after something like that? The lady in the middle is gaslighting though. The odds that it’s a judge who happened to leave the prosecution mid-case to help Epstein beat their own case and broker those deals avoiding federal prosecution, has got to be a very short list.. That’s different than being billionaire neighbors in the same social circles for a bit.

  • @bryana8383
    @bryana8383 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Epstein is still alive...

  • @kgypster
    @kgypster 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nothing is a coincidence

  • @DonquijoteDC
    @DonquijoteDC 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is not a story. Lawyers practice law for money. Ethics have been absent from that practice for a long time. This guy got paid by a bad guy is literally 90% of law cases.

    • @ralphpal
      @ralphpal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It has nothing to do with that
      It has to do with
      Did the fbi force him to sign it cause he knows who is on the list

  • @wayneborkovich3460
    @wayneborkovich3460 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Bri you seem to want to call Trump a criminal, maybe you ease your mind and tell us what sort of facts you have of his criminality. After six years of constant abuse and innuendo I haven't heard a single fact

  • @UKindness4
    @UKindness4 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So did Ken Starr represent Epstein! Is Ken Starr involved? This is ridiculous!

    • @billyboy969
      @billyboy969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes ken star did at tower finical

  • @shun506
    @shun506 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Banana republic under democrates

  • @DM-sy4hg
    @DM-sy4hg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    "Your Honor...sign this warrant...or Maxwell's client list may find it's way into the public sphere..." I made that up of course but this story is getting to be THAT crazy.

  • @lancefulbright2685
    @lancefulbright2685 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    trump kicked epstein out of miro lago they ment each out a few time

    • @billyboy969
      @billyboy969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The real connections with trump, epstein, and maxwell are many - FACTS!

  • @portlandhasbecometrash8437
    @portlandhasbecometrash8437 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Trump amd epstine were not close and didnt have a relation bri is wrong

  • @lovawood1629
    @lovawood1629 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I watch the hill because I want get to the truth. I refuse to watch any of the news outlets that pander to one side or the other. I have actually gained a great deal of insight from the different perspectives and I am thankful for that. What is difficult for me at the moment is what seems to Brianna’s defend the narrative until death wether right or wrong mentality. Please do not get me wrong, I have actually at times been enlightened by Brianna’s perspective, however once she goes into this non sense narrative that makes no common sense I can’t listen. She obviously has a lot of wonderful , intellectual and captivating things to say, but when she digs into this all or nothing narrative to prove the left is above board 100% of the time without question is just too much. No side right or left is above board and perfectly in line with the rules all of the time. Maybe if she would just admit that it would be easier to trust what she says. I have come to trust more of what Robby says because he calls both sides out. Sometimes I do not like what I hear, but it is what I need to hear and it has merit. I just wish these journalists, anchors, hosts would just be real and open minded and unbiased.
    My take away from this is the man that signed the order has a price. He was bought by Epstein so who can say with 100% clarity that he wasn’t bought this time. He is a man for hire to the highest bidder. I don’t trust any of what happened. You can not explain these things away.

    • @Silence_Duder_Gooder
      @Silence_Duder_Gooder 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's controlled opposition.
      Follow the money where The Hill is concerned.
      You're STILL being duped.

  • @thomasdorsey3227
    @thomasdorsey3227 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "It's a disease" says it all

  • @113doctor3
    @113doctor3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is nothing 113Doctor can’t do on the internet.
    You can not hide if 113Doctor wishes to judge you.
    113Doctor will use your phone to find you and judge you.

  • @bls8959
    @bls8959 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They obviously blackmailed the judge

  • @mattjeffsdpt
    @mattjeffsdpt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    She stammers and redirects on the elephant in the room. That elephant is the 'Johns List.' It seems the podcast she hosts 'covering' the Epstein phenomenon does, too. What a shame.

  • @krzysztofwilczkowski8643
    @krzysztofwilczkowski8643 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    What a bs ? Coincidence? They don’t ask Clinton ?!

    • @jonmeyer7402
      @jonmeyer7402 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bill Clinton isn't actively running for president... also if this is connected to epstien they could raid him tomorrow when it rains it pours let's hope Clinton did abuse Monica Lewinsky

  • @gr33dyglutton
    @gr33dyglutton 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sounds like this guy is morally flexible

  • @gabademics9184
    @gabademics9184 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bri actually floated the idea that trump has a little black book of Epstein... Glad I unsubscribed.

  • @shanenelson3825
    @shanenelson3825 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Justice for me but not for thee.

  • @ThePrinceraj88
    @ThePrinceraj88 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    THE GUEST EPPSTEIN PODCAST GIRL-TARA IS VERY ENTERTAINING🌟🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥ROBBIE LOVES HER PODCAST 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @onepcwhiz6847
    @onepcwhiz6847 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bill Clinton on the Lolita Express.. old story.

  • @kenbrien4978
    @kenbrien4978 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Great guest, well informed on the topic.

  • @jaybourne1185
    @jaybourne1185 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    is it just me or do the "coincidences always seem to stack up with the democrats"... classic

  • @tatumgerhardt8200
    @tatumgerhardt8200 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is a connection to me & E ******....I want MY fair day in court!!!!!

  • @aroundandround
    @aroundandround 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Guest reminds me of Claire Danes.

  • @jamesscott7616
    @jamesscott7616 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey I got a copy of the little black book. It was made available online.

  • @Sinner-fi4bw
    @Sinner-fi4bw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mainstream media the hill. What fools lose their best person for a video that got ratioed hard.

  • @msm663
    @msm663 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    So glad that you are bringing this story into the light!
    Funny that this story has been suppressed all this time.

  • @crazybkallday
    @crazybkallday 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oooooooooooh 👀

  • @GalacticNewsNetwork1
    @GalacticNewsNetwork1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like we know wat was maxwells deal huh?

  • @todgordan9948
    @todgordan9948 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey heyyy im shocked you guys are reporting on this 🤩

  • @jonblack6624
    @jonblack6624 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    it is true black book disappeared from DOJ evidence lockup 3yrs ago bill barr last person to sign out book n left in oval office only to return and nobody seen it ever since until monday when it was found in safe at maralago???

    • @josephclements2145
      @josephclements2145 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, its not you can read it (redacted) online. You could for example see for yourself how Trump's name was used in it.

  • @PV96
    @PV96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What’s the difference between a Judge and a Magistrate, if any??

    • @MrSumone
      @MrSumone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Magistrates primarily handle minor offenses AND preliminary type hearings, warrant applications, and the like.

    • @rhys5567
      @rhys5567 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Seniority and jurisdictional power.

    • @l.w.paradis2108
      @l.w.paradis2108 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't believe magistrates are lifetime appointments.

  • @jefflandreneau7027
    @jefflandreneau7027 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    She fine

  • @wdw2540
    @wdw2540 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Hill has really gone down hill. This discussion is moronic.

  • @FreeWVson
    @FreeWVson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I doubt yall will look into this .

  • @fukingcounterstrike
    @fukingcounterstrike 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    8:40 Rather than "conspiracy theory" I'd call it speculation. We can speculate on how all the dots are connected. There may be relation or not, but it's fair to incorporate something we know as fact into this speculation until more evidence proves otherwise. Yes I am being semantic because "conspiracy theory" is used too often to write off perspectives that are damaging to an agenda

    • @jakes658
      @jakes658 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      A lack of evidence destroys pretty much every right wing conspiracy theory...

    • @fukingcounterstrike
      @fukingcounterstrike 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jakes658 okay, your point? The thing is that there currently is no evidence of anything besides the raid happened. Without anything people will speculate. Some are more far fetched than others, yes, and I think it appropriate to call it out, but there's also no evidence to prove it wrong (yet), just a much lower probability value of it being true. Things that often get national coverage and treated as truth turn out to be "conspiracy theories" such as russia gate. My critique is how the term "conspiracy theory" is thrown around too much and ultimately used to quell dissenting ideas and views and truth. Think we'll ever be told the truth on the matter either?

  • @roberto4898
    @roberto4898 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Point: the ad hominem

  • @jacobrichards720
    @jacobrichards720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The hill is drinking the koolaid. Shame

    • @l.w.paradis2108
      @l.w.paradis2108 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because Epstein wasn't one of the most deeply connected people in history.
      Don't listen to the report. Just jump in with your inexplicable feewings.

  • @raptorreddelta3986
    @raptorreddelta3986 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Epstein-linked judge appointed by Epstein-linked Trump approves warrant on Epstein-linked Trump. Keeping it in the family lol

    • @bestdjaf7499
      @bestdjaf7499 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trump is into Milfs.
      In one of the interviews, Trump actually said that Epstein is into the younger girls.
      Actually the "Epstein's" girls did see Trump at some of the events, but they said that he was always alone.
      And no one ever accused Trump of going after girls.
      A lot of older women did accused Trump tho.
      So Trump is definitely into Milfs.

  • @hidesinlonggrass3229
    @hidesinlonggrass3229 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wasn't it Trump that appointed said judge...? 🤔

    • @unboxedcharacter
      @unboxedcharacter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Why would Trump appoint a judge that donates millions to Obama- wild what folks will Smollet in order to get a political point across😭😭

    • @DWayne-fk9rp
      @DWayne-fk9rp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@unboxedcharacter Trump did appoint him, as he also appointed another Epstien lawyer (Costa), and both of Trump's impeachment lawyers (Starr & Dershowitz) were also Epstein lawyers. Trump was caught up in the Epstien and Maxwell Mossad blackmail racket. Why would Trump be such an Israel-worshipping fake Zionist Christian, if he weren't compromised like the rest of our elected and appointed leaders?

    • @unboxedcharacter
      @unboxedcharacter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DWayne-fk9rp got any sources to help back your claims? A lot of folks Smolleting in order to get their political points across in 2022 🤷‍♂️

    • @DWayne-fk9rp
      @DWayne-fk9rp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@unboxedcharacter I've tried twice but it keeps getting deleted.

    • @unboxedcharacter
      @unboxedcharacter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DWayne-fk9rp must not deal with sources too much on YT. Idk Why but, You gotta type it all out. Publication. Title. Date. Author. Thanks

  • @timwhite5562
    @timwhite5562 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is one of the most pointless segments I've seen on The Hill since starting to watch it a couple years ago. This woman says throughout it that Epstein has no link whatsoever here, so why is it even mentioned?
    Palmeri babbled on and on and on and just kept repeating "there's no link, but we don't everything so proud are always going to wonder." And the rest of it was "look how much resources you can get when you're filthy rich," in a slightly different way each time. It was like a flashback to the whole "known knowns, then you have unknown knowns, and there are unknown unknowns," conference.
    What a dumb segment. I'm going to give the Hill the benefit of the doubt and assume they thought there was going to more to this than that.
    I can see reading the comments that it was a popular with every conspiracy believing nitwit that subscribe to the channel.