🚨 Hey everyone! 🚨 If you’re enjoying the content, don’t forget to smash that LIKE button 👍 and SUBSCRIBE to the channel! 🔔 www.youtube.com/@AmericanMuscleCars1?sub_confirmation=1 It really helps us out and ensures you won't miss any of our awesome videos! 😊 Thanks for watching and being part of our community!
This is a garbage video. The description means nothing, apparently. These cars aren't muscle cars and many aren't ugly. How do you compare a fwd Cavalier and a Mustang? Four cylinder Cricket, a muscle car? How do you show a beautiful 1987 Cutlass Supreme Brougham while talking about a 1976 Cutlass? Sunbirds, REALLY? LE Baron/TC, TOO? WTF? @15:47 You show a Cutlass Pace car, saying it's a Thunderbird?! Personal luxury cars aren't muscle cars. Fwd Citations aren't muscles car, they weren't ugly either IMO. You showed Mustangs while talking about T-birds? Just throw the channel away, start over.
Congratulations you found some of America's most unwanted vehicles, although they were all far from Muscle Cars. The Mustang II was at least was popular as a Pro Stocker driven Dyno Don Nicholson.
@@kevinkehlet1543 muscle car by name doesnt mean big or small but powerfull as in "got muscle" but i agree that they are not the same segment, i´m european and didn´t saw any litle car , smaller than usual in american cars but small are another ,like the rover 114, the MG metro and Detomaso or autobianchi in early to mid 80´s that were powerfull ,i myself had a Detomaso and was a incredible litle car with a 1.3L engine but due to it´s size and weight was fast as hell, the Y that apeared as a autobianchi it ended up sold as a lancia but another litle powerfull car, even with a 1.1L engine in can draw a moutache in a american V8 from the same years. today there is the Toyota yaris that is a litle but nice car and confortable inside, the GR version that i bought in 2019 was the same cost as a big sedan or even the same price as the four door jaguar one of the most interisting cars of the last 16 years and sold cheap, but i only bought the yaris because it had all extras and quality materials and being litle i could go faster than a Porshe, Ferrari, Lamborguini and only a yaris it even seems a joke but after 6 mionthes i was tired of it and sold it with 7.000€ profit and it was explained that like me i waited 6 monthes to have it and when someone wants it right away he pays 50.000€ for it ,if you can imagine the best materials in luxury and fast cars the Yaris is built with them
You had so many wrong cars like Mustangs and Cutlass in the Thunderbird slots. It was too confusing. I thought I missed something so I had to go back and rewind.
i have a thunderbird from the 80´s and it´s a funny car ,it came with a colour scheme sold as every Ford model in europe in late 80´s, i have a Fiesta, a Escort, a Capri and a Sierra with the same colour scheme being all sportive models,being the thunderbird the biggest of all, the Sierra is the only who as diesel engine but a turbo-diesel engine 1.8L like used on comercial vehicules like the Transit van without turbo
it were the 80´s and cars were almost all look a like and at the time some of this showed here style was very looked for in other models as in Europe ,the same with some exceptions
Your number 10 is stil a British car. British! It is a Hillman Avenger. It never was and pretented to be a Plymouth. When did you get it?! It was built in Coventry, and was never a car for the US market. To small for the Landyachts around.
I think they mixed up the title with the videos This says ugliest and they are talking about performance. The 4 bangers aren’t anything close to being performance. The first vehicle Oldsmobile, the salon they showed was ugly but wasn’t produced until 1978 not 1976
The muscle car area ended in the early seventies. Early! So what is the fuzz? A Mitsubishi never was an American car at all. It doesn't made a difference, what bages were flinged around. All cars were made after the oil crises of 1973 were far off, being even called a real muscle car. No difference how they named their crap shite later on! 1973 was that year, as real good cars died forever. 🤬
Just what it says, two cylinders in the back and then 90 degrees and two in front. The crank has a differential gear setup that drives another crank, producing an L shape. Very popular throught the 60s and 70s in all makes. Especially the VW Hurst shelby gt camstangcuda with optional thurdercutlass trim😂😂
How the hll can you make a video about the ugliest cars in Usa without a Pontiac Aztec or Tesla Cybertruck. They are by far the ugliest cars ever made in Usa.
You call bucket seats to current sportive look seats with headrest or long at above head level?i thought that were only old real sport seats, or even released as the standart size sport seats from the 50´s or 60´s
Monte Carlo, Thunderbird, and mustang should not be in the list because they’re better cars than all the other cars in the list. Plus they are way better looking as well
Pretty sure all of these intentional errors and gaffes are to increase engagement and views, because there's no way this was written, rehearsed, and reviewed before recording and posting it.
The thunderbird turbo coups where nice looking cars, and you are showing a mustang in some of the footage, and you are showing a 1980 model as well. Ford did not discontinue it they replaced it with the super coup I suggest you actually do some research
I'm sorry, but not one of these cars was a muscle car. Very few cars are muscle cars. Two cars on this list, the Monte Carlo and the thunderbird are luxury cruisers. The 80s and 90s cars are almost all classified as sport compacts and are basically cheap econo cars. The gremlin x was not a 70 model. The x model was introduced in 71 and was not available with a v8 until 73. And by 73 the muscle era was all but done. By 72 there were only a handful of muscle cars left. The epa made sure of that. And almost every clip showed the wrong car. The pace car shown was a 74 Hurst cutlass, not a thunderbird. These videos are definitely Facebook fact check approved though 😂
I will agree on UGLY unless commented below #15 - Not a Muscle Car #14 - A Sub Compact for the Times, Junk #13 - Compact Junk #12 - Compact of the Sunbird (79 the best) that in the fastback was great fun to drive #11 - A Chevy Vega Copy, LOL #10 - LOL, like a Honda or Toyota, Super Ugly #9 - any Subbird that was NOT a Fastback (like the 79) was a Failed Body design My wife had the 79 V6 with a Stick and was FUN TO DRIVE #8 - Monte Carlo was NEVER a Muscle Car - But was and still is a Great Looking Car #7 - LOL, this was PURE JUNK #6 - T Birds should NEVER have grown in size, should have always been the Ford Vette #5 - Funny Looking Car - Junk #4 - See comment on #6 #3 - OOO -You can not Pick on this Baby - Better than Mustang II or Pinto #2 - LOL, Mustang II was the End of the Real Mustang, Glad we have a Real Mustang today #1 - Just Pure Junk
i only don´t get why the Ford symbol and Chevrolet then Pontiac , this last isn´t the same as the chevrolet or maybe some cars here are prior to the ford aquisitian
One of the things missing from this narrative of cars of the mid 70' into the 80's was the restrictions mandated by the government in horse power. The narrator consistently refers to these sleds a "MUSCLE CARS." Post 1973 there were no "MUSCLE CARS." Referring to the Gremlin. Mentioning Gremlin didn't have a "BACK SEAT."/FIXED REAR HATCH WINDOW Is incorrect. That was an entry level model in 1970-71. Gremlins after that had REAR SEATS/OPERABLE REAR HATCH WINDOW. With close to 900,000 units sold. Gremlin was quite popular. This narrator needs to do more research into some of these cars. False narratives makes for disinformation/misinformation. If The Young Narrator Would Like, In The Future, Assistance In Covering 50's-80's Automobiles. Please Do Not Hesitate to contact me. Thumbs Down.
i don´t see the ugliest cars but cars from it´s age when all the cars in the world this refering to early or mid 80´s when cars were appearing with not metal bumpers and the look of the decade some even seem to me more atractive than other japanese or european cars, the best decade to buy you´re old favorite cars as chromed was old and plastic and foam(or other ,or same style but not metal)was modern . I have a colection of cars thanks to this at the time new wave of makin`cars, even 3 year old cars were old or a 78 model and in 81 were as old as 10 year old cars, the in-line engines some are what seem to be the Ford and GM brands in Europe with some modifications, the late 70´s had some strange old sport models versions that are not that atractive, i have a hillman but a shorter car and it as some american car charateristics, the one showed here was a superior model allthough the litle ones are the ones that are still looked for ,mine came with a record player only for singles and it´s 60´s compact car, at a litle size of cars, some are bigger but in general all are considered litle, i´m not sure but isn´t the AMC pacer the one called Gremlin, i drove it once while in the U.S. in late 70´s and found it a compact car but atractive as the interiors are made with superior quality and handles good for a american car, i do love some late 50´s and late 60´s to early 70´s cars and could bought them while selling american cars in Europe , some do not turn as expected but are a confort ride and only pay atention to turns, in resume i´m not saying they are beautifull but it happened with all cars in the world at the time and in the 80´s i remenber a lot of people liking this new style, Honda´s, Toyota´s, mazda´s and Datsun by nissan(as normally said in a litle rectangle glued in the back9 have amazing cars that only got even worst at building materials level in the 90´s
Hahahaha - did you only have a certain amount of videos to throw together and try to make something out of it? Obviously born after the time these cars were manufactured. You can say the same thing about any car made during these years.
These all look like brand new cars to me because they are all so ugly i never looked at them when they came out the first time so the rest doesn't even matter.
🚨 Hey everyone! 🚨
If you’re enjoying the content, don’t forget to smash that LIKE button 👍 and SUBSCRIBE to the channel! 🔔
www.youtube.com/@AmericanMuscleCars1?sub_confirmation=1
It really helps us out and ensures you won't miss any of our awesome videos! 😊
Thanks for watching and being part of our community!
Lackluster and uninspiring video, full of incorrect information, poor video quality, plagiarism and copyright issues. Hope you get sued as whole.
This is complete garbage. More errors than I can count.
These aren't muscle cars, they're economy cars
Man Get your info and pics right or stop. You know just STOP you are from I dont know where but just STOP, JUST STOP.
Sport compacts are not muscle cars. Like, EVER
This is a garbage video. The description means nothing, apparently. These cars aren't muscle cars and many aren't ugly. How do you compare a fwd Cavalier and a Mustang? Four cylinder Cricket, a muscle car? How do you show a beautiful 1987 Cutlass Supreme Brougham while talking about a 1976 Cutlass? Sunbirds, REALLY? LE Baron/TC, TOO? WTF? @15:47 You show a Cutlass Pace car, saying it's a Thunderbird?! Personal luxury cars aren't muscle cars. Fwd Citations aren't muscles car, they weren't ugly either IMO. You showed Mustangs while talking about T-birds? Just throw the channel away, start over.
😂😂😂
Congratulations you found some of America's most unwanted vehicles, although they were all far from Muscle Cars. The Mustang II was at least was popular as a Pro Stocker driven Dyno Don Nicholson.
The Thunderbird turbocoupe was a 2.3l inline 4-cylinder. please, re-check your sources
I guess the turbo v6 lives in the same universe as 2.3 i4 that look a lot like big block chevys and mustangs are t birds and t birds are mustangs.
@staffy73 not to mention the miss categorizing of muscle car vs. sport compact
@@kevinkehlet1543 muscle car by name doesnt mean big or small but powerfull as in "got muscle" but i agree that they are not the same segment, i´m european and didn´t saw any litle car , smaller than usual in american cars but small are another ,like the rover 114, the MG metro and Detomaso or autobianchi in early to mid 80´s that were powerfull ,i myself had a Detomaso and was a incredible litle car with a 1.3L engine but due to it´s size and weight was fast as hell, the Y that apeared as a autobianchi it ended up sold as a lancia but another litle powerfull car, even with a 1.1L engine in can draw a moutache in a american V8 from the same years. today there is the Toyota yaris that is a litle but nice car and confortable inside, the GR version that i bought in 2019 was the same cost as a big sedan or even the same price as the four door jaguar one of the most interisting cars of the last 16 years and sold cheap, but i only bought the yaris because it had all extras and quality materials and being litle i could go faster than a Porshe, Ferrari, Lamborguini and only a yaris it even seems a joke but after 6 mionthes i was tired of it and sold it with 7.000€ profit and it was explained that like me i waited 6 monthes to have it and when someone wants it right away he pays 50.000€ for it ,if you can imagine the best materials in luxury and fast cars the Yaris is built with them
Don't you mean Thunderturd?
…which was really a bad choice for Ford to use at that time when it could have used a turbocharged V6 in the T-Bird turbo.
You may have to pay the Car Wizard a royalty for showing his shop....lmfao
Errors and bad opinions. 😢
You had so many wrong cars like Mustangs and Cutlass in the Thunderbird slots. It was too confusing. I thought I missed something so I had to go back and rewind.
The pace car was a cutlass, not a Thunderbird
i have a thunderbird from the 80´s and it´s a funny car ,it came with a colour scheme sold as every Ford model in europe in late 80´s, i have a Fiesta, a Escort, a Capri and a Sierra with the same colour scheme being all sportive models,being the thunderbird the biggest of all, the Sierra is the only who as diesel engine but a turbo-diesel engine 1.8L like used on comercial vehicules like the Transit van without turbo
I think the author needs to look up the definition of a muscle car. This one misses the mark. I gave in at the '71 Plymouth Cricket.
Cricket as a muscle car?
😂
Couldn't make it past the first two cars. On what planet are those two cars, considered muscle cars.
it were the 80´s and cars were almost all look a like and at the time some of this showed here style was very looked for in other models as in Europe ,the same with some exceptions
I consider the Z24 one of the best looking compacts of the 80s and 90s, not sporty but surely cool
Yeah the z24 is a pretty good car i see them still on the road.
Your number 10 is stil a British car. British! It is a Hillman Avenger. It never was and pretented to be a Plymouth. When did you get it?! It was built in Coventry, and was never a car for the US market. To small for the Landyachts around.
I think they mixed up the title with the videos
This says ugliest and they are talking about performance.
The 4 bangers aren’t anything close to being performance.
The first vehicle Oldsmobile, the salon they showed was ugly but wasn’t produced until 1978 not 1976
The muscle car area ended in the early seventies. Early!
So what is the fuzz? A Mitsubishi never was an American car at all. It doesn't made a difference, what bages were flinged around. All cars were made after the oil crises of 1973 were far off, being even called a real muscle car. No difference how they named their crap shite later on!
1973 was that year, as real good cars died forever. 🤬
I like the look of these cars. Better looking than the new uninspired mini suv that everything looks like now.
I will simply 'Restomod' them all, I will still buy any or all of them. Thank you for posting/sharing.
Wtf is an L4 engine????
Just what it says, two cylinders in the back and then 90 degrees and two in front. The crank has a differential gear setup that drives another crank, producing an L shape. Very popular throught the 60s and 70s in all makes. Especially the VW Hurst shelby gt camstangcuda with optional thurdercutlass trim😂😂
So…. A RWD car with torque steer. I mean these aren’t even mistakes anymore this has to be deliberate to get a rise out of car enthusiasts
Whoever put this together has no idea what they are talking about none of these were intended as performance cars
Ai crap
How the hll can you make a video about the ugliest cars in Usa without a Pontiac Aztec or Tesla Cybertruck. They are by far the ugliest cars ever made in Usa.
Saw a video of bears attacking a cybertruck thinking it was a dumpster
The Gremlin and Vega were two of my favorite cars as a kid.
These cars are toys
not that far
I love the first 2 Z24
Looking more like a google search inspired video… lotta cars are not considered muscle cars .
Obviously you have no clue what a “ muscle car” is.. give up.
Gads, what garbage!
Terrible. AI. B S.
Learn a little about muscle cars before you make misleading. videos please.
The Thunderbird Turbo Coupe was an inline 4-cylinder 2.3 l turbocharged engine read it at 210 horsepower
Most of the troubles was the lazy mentality of companies putting to many names on the same car
You call bucket seats to current sportive look seats with headrest or long at above head level?i thought that were only old real sport seats, or even released as the standart size sport seats from the 50´s or 60´s
Heeey I just happen to LOVE 😍🥰❤️My 86 Z/24 4-spd!😎🏁
Oldsmobile, Chevrolet and Pontiac in this video had good design, not a masterpieces but good for the times
Beauty is in the eye of the of the beholder , It's different I don't like it but someone bought it .
seems like those turbos didnt do much but give them turbo lag and reliability problems.
Yeah, pretty much everything from about 1974 to 1989 sucked balls. Only with the introduction of the Nissan Z32/300ZX did the tide begin to turn.
Does anybody else agree that the muscle car era ended in about 1975?
Monte Carlo, Thunderbird, and mustang should not be in the list because they’re better cars than all the other cars in the list. Plus they are way better looking as well
Should have called it the Thunderturd
Pretty sure all of these intentional errors and gaffes are to increase engagement and views, because there's no way this was written, rehearsed, and reviewed before recording and posting it.
The thunderbird turbo coups where nice looking cars, and you are showing a mustang in some of the footage, and you are showing a 1980 model as well. Ford did not discontinue it they replaced it with the super coup I suggest you actually do some research
03 is a classic? WTF, I didn't see a single muscle car
I'm sorry, but not one of these cars was a muscle car. Very few cars are muscle cars. Two cars on this list, the Monte Carlo and the thunderbird are luxury cruisers. The 80s and 90s cars are almost all classified as sport compacts and are basically cheap econo cars. The gremlin x was not a 70 model. The x model was introduced in 71 and was not available with a v8 until 73. And by 73 the muscle era was all but done. By 72 there were only a handful of muscle cars left. The epa made sure of that. And almost every clip showed the wrong car. The pace car shown was a 74 Hurst cutlass, not a thunderbird. These videos are definitely Facebook fact check approved though 😂
I’m sorry but the video doesn’t even say that they are showing muscle cars 😂
The Mustang 2 game king cobra was actually powered by a 302 are those horsepower ratings sucked
Almost every American car built in the late 70's to early 80's were barf.
The 1980s Ford Thunderbird is not ugly.
Hey. Everyone.
Just enjoy the content for what it is. Don't get hung up an a page name.
If the content was correct, it would help! There are so many errors in this it's crap.
In general the Mopar and also Ford design are not at the same level of GM design.
You've earned every one of those 391 subscribers with this video atrocity. I guess you're just trolling car enthusiasts.
😵💫What's it like to do a video, add AI narration, upload it, and see it the next day
after the drugs have worn off.?
Not classic cars and some those cars were not looking like the Z24, Ford EXP, Sunbird formula and more.
There are too many errors in this video, need to correct and redo.
What is this guy smoking? Say NO to drugs kids
I will agree on UGLY unless commented below
#15 - Not a Muscle Car
#14 - A Sub Compact for the Times, Junk
#13 - Compact Junk
#12 - Compact of the Sunbird (79 the best) that in the fastback was great fun to drive
#11 - A Chevy Vega Copy, LOL
#10 - LOL, like a Honda or Toyota, Super Ugly
#9 - any Subbird that was NOT a Fastback (like the 79) was a Failed Body design
My wife had the 79 V6 with a Stick and was FUN TO DRIVE
#8 - Monte Carlo was NEVER a Muscle Car - But was and still is a Great Looking Car
#7 - LOL, this was PURE JUNK
#6 - T Birds should NEVER have grown in size, should have always been the Ford Vette
#5 - Funny Looking Car - Junk
#4 - See comment on #6
#3 - OOO -You can not Pick on this Baby - Better than Mustang II or Pinto
#2 - LOL, Mustang II was the End of the Real Mustang, Glad we have a Real Mustang today
#1 - Just Pure Junk
The Pontiac Sunbird is not an ugly car...
Thre TBirb was not the 1rst Americam Turbo V6... Buick did it well before ford
i only don´t get why the Ford symbol and Chevrolet then Pontiac , this last isn´t the same as the chevrolet or maybe some cars here are prior to the ford aquisitian
One of the things missing from this narrative of cars of the mid 70' into the 80's was the restrictions mandated by the government in horse power. The narrator consistently refers to these sleds a "MUSCLE CARS." Post 1973 there were no "MUSCLE CARS." Referring to the Gremlin. Mentioning Gremlin didn't have a "BACK SEAT."/FIXED REAR HATCH WINDOW Is incorrect. That was an entry level model in 1970-71. Gremlins after that had REAR SEATS/OPERABLE REAR HATCH WINDOW. With close to 900,000 units sold. Gremlin was quite popular. This narrator needs to do more research into some of these cars. False narratives makes for disinformation/misinformation. If The Young Narrator Would Like, In The Future, Assistance In Covering 50's-80's Automobiles. Please Do Not Hesitate to contact me. Thumbs Down.
The Mustang King cobra is not ugly
All king cobras had v8s
Keep showing the wrong cars in video
i don´t see the ugliest cars but cars from it´s age when all the cars in the world this refering to early or mid 80´s when cars were appearing with not metal bumpers and the look of the decade some even seem to me more atractive than other japanese or european cars, the best decade to buy you´re old favorite cars as chromed was old and plastic and foam(or other ,or same style but not metal)was modern . I have a colection of cars thanks to this at the time new wave of makin`cars, even 3 year old cars were old or a 78 model and in 81 were as old as 10 year old cars, the in-line engines some are what seem to be the Ford and GM brands in Europe with some modifications, the late 70´s had some strange old sport models versions that are not that atractive, i have a hillman but a shorter car and it as some american car charateristics, the one showed here was a superior model allthough the litle ones are the ones that are still looked for ,mine came with a record player only for singles and it´s 60´s compact car, at a litle size of cars, some are bigger but in general all are considered litle, i´m not sure but isn´t the AMC pacer the one called Gremlin, i drove it once while in the U.S. in late 70´s and found it a compact car but atractive as the interiors are made with superior quality and handles good for a american car, i do love some late 50´s and late 60´s to early 70´s cars and could bought them while selling american cars in Europe , some do not turn as expected but are a confort ride and only pay atention to turns, in resume i´m not saying they are beautifull but it happened with all cars in the world at the time and in the 80´s i remenber a lot of people liking this new style, Honda´s, Toyota´s, mazda´s and Datsun by nissan(as normally said in a litle rectangle glued in the back9 have amazing cars that only got even worst at building materials level in the 90´s
Don't know where you get your information but you are wrong and what you mistake for fact is just a matter of opinion
Hahahaha - did you only have a certain amount of videos to throw together and try to make something out of it? Obviously born after the time these cars were manufactured. You can say the same thing about any car made during these years.
2.8l was a world class turd
The years gas rationing stupid time of gov rules,why even bother with this stuff
These all look like brand new cars to me because they are all so ugly i never looked at them when they came out the first time so the rest doesn't even matter.
Dead on with this! Some really Fugly cars and really, really bad ideas. Great video, Thanks!!
The AMC Matador is the ugliest car of all time.
Worse than the Aztek?
Pacer
@@bloodybones63 Hard to argue with that.
Sloppy, sloppy editing.
Just another AI crappy narration. JUST STOP
this vid blows
Get a job!
Wtf is an L4 engine????