Joachim Trier has become one of my favorite directors. He makes the types of movies that I want to make in the future as an aspiring screenwriter and director.
Shame...The actress was just allowed to talk after 10 minutes of interview, because the director made her a question. And she almost didn't have enough time to complete one sentence. And so it goes, with the interviewer ignoring her. Besides feminism, she acted so magnificently in the movie, she deserved much more.
I saw this film yesterday and have to say I was a little disappointed,I didn't think it was a masterpiece.Honestly I think far too much of a fuss is made over so many films and too much time spent talking about them. Her character was hard to like and hard to believe she was really supposed to be a thirty year old woman behaving more like a 20/22 year old quite honesty,she felt spoilt and indulgent. I don't think it was until the end that I really felt more emotionally engaged ..but then maybe that was the point of it..she wasn't particularly likable,she was kind of careless and it wasn't until her pregnancy and then the forseeable loss of her ex lover that I felt able to really care much about her
I also think this movie was mediocre at best. Her character was basically non-existent, extremly dull and besides her apperance it's hard to believe why other men were so obsessed with her. I think with another less attractive actress this movie wouldn't be hyped at all.
@@markkiss9321 Her character isn't dull, she is literally trying to find herself and her purpose in life, within the film. Her character is very easy to resonate with for many people. Secondly, the men in the film are attracted to more than her appearance; she has multiple scenes where she is flirtatious and bubbly. There are multiple occasions where she is outgoing and also fun to be around for others (dancing, chatting, laughing). Finally, I personally disagree with the remark that she is "spoilt and indulgent", she works in a bookstore and shares an apartment, not really a lavish life. If you want to see a spoilt main character, then watch "The Souvenir".
It was honestly such a great privilege to watch this film an afternoon this week, through an LA Times preview, and this chance to hear so clearly from you persons involved brought a thought about why the experience felt so important. When you speak here, you each evidence an intelligence that it's seldom indeed to encounter in any public art. You present so through your presences in acting and story and scene in the film, yet it's an important confirmation, part of the whole I think, that you show such brightness of wit and consideration when asked to speak in the contexts of it. I had the thought that an actress might have been held back from parts, as was said, due to this in her case, but it should not often be held back, for what it offers in our world of so many sly and blurred expressions.. Why? For me, because this 'presence of the real' in a person is actually able to be taken up for its own presence in nearly anyone; and in that, to offer us the doorways and avenues out of the times we are in. And so you did, each of you and 'Eivind' as well, all of those present, in the gift of the film. Thank you.
Joachim Trier has become one of my favorite directors. He makes the types of movies that I want to make in the future as an aspiring screenwriter and director.
you can sure do as good if not better one day, keep your head up and keep working on your goal !! Good luck !!
Joachim Trier is so moving!!! everytime he talks I wanna cry, he is so poetic.
i love his explanation about time-stops scene :')
Anders Danielsen Lie is actually a medial doctor 😊
Big fan of you Joachim. Love from Burma.
18:36 what was this question?
Beautiful film.
she's so incredibly gorgeous it's crazy. i'm down bad boys
Shame...The actress was just allowed to talk after 10 minutes of interview, because the director made her a question. And she almost didn't have enough time to complete one sentence. And so it goes, with the interviewer ignoring her. Besides feminism, she acted so magnificently in the movie, she deserved much more.
What💀
there's a previous interview at the same venue with the same interviewer where she talked a lot. I think they're just trying to spice it up
@@bey3910 Better this way! 😊 @Bey!
Wdym besides feminism
Uhh… in film festivals, the focus is on the director, unless the actor is really famous, which Renate is not.
💜
I saw this film yesterday and have to say I was a little disappointed,I didn't think it was a masterpiece.Honestly I think far too much of a fuss is made over so many films and too much time spent talking about them.
Her character was hard to like and hard to believe she was really supposed to be a thirty year old woman behaving more like a 20/22 year old quite honesty,she felt spoilt and indulgent.
I don't think it was until the end that I really felt more emotionally engaged ..but then maybe that was the point of it..she wasn't particularly likable,she was kind of careless and it wasn't until her pregnancy and then the forseeable loss of her ex lover that I felt able to really care much about her
I also think this movie was mediocre at best. Her character was basically non-existent, extremly dull and besides her apperance it's hard to believe why other men were so obsessed with her.
I think with another less attractive actress this movie wouldn't be hyped at all.
@@markkiss9321 Her character isn't dull, she is literally trying to find herself and her purpose in life, within the film. Her character is very easy to resonate with for many people. Secondly, the men in the film are attracted to more than her appearance; she has multiple scenes where she is flirtatious and bubbly. There are multiple occasions where she is outgoing and also fun to be around for others (dancing, chatting, laughing). Finally, I personally disagree with the remark that she is "spoilt and indulgent", she works in a bookstore and shares an apartment, not really a lavish life. If you want to see a spoilt main character, then watch "The Souvenir".
@@daniellomax2263 Liked your response. The best rebuttal.
she puke again?
Huh?
It was honestly such a great privilege to watch this film an afternoon this week, through an LA Times preview, and this chance to hear so clearly from you persons involved brought a thought about why the experience felt so important.
When you speak here, you each evidence an intelligence that it's seldom indeed to encounter in any public art. You present so through your presences in acting and story and scene in the film, yet it's an important confirmation, part of the whole I think, that you show such brightness of wit and consideration when asked to speak in the contexts of it.
I had the thought that an actress might have been held back from parts, as was said, due to this in her case, but it should not often be held back, for what it offers in our world of so many sly and blurred expressions.. Why? For me, because this 'presence of the real' in a person is actually able to be taken up for its own presence in nearly anyone; and in that, to offer us the doorways and avenues out of the times we are in.
And so you did, each of you and 'Eivind' as well, all of those present, in the gift of the film. Thank you.