Ethics in AI Workshop | AI and Judgement - Philosophy

The aim of the workshop was to examine the concept of judgement, especially in relation to rules (and the extent to which judgement is an application of rules), and then to consider to what extent human judgement might be enhanced, replaced, or undermined in different domains by AI tools. An important theme we pursued is the way in which judgement has varying significance and responds to different values/concerns in different domains of activity.
Session 1: PHILOSOPHY with key speaker Baroness Onora O’Neill Philosophy, (Cambridge) in discussion with Sir Nigel Shadbolt (Computer Science and EAI, Oxford), Professor Alison Hills (Philosophy, Oxford) and chaired by Dr Carissa Veliz (EAI and Philosophy, Oxford)

[@for-ever-22]

This conversations are extremely relevant more so with the rapid adoption LLM agents. Please keep he videos coming

[@patmetzner]

Very good to lean

[@paulamcnama1499]

Thanks for this x

[@amiralhijaz5850]

Thanx

[@angelabarbara139]

Addressing "INTELLIGENCE" (as in AI and such...) and the obvious need for "MACHINE LEARNING" to apply correctability would of been nice to assess, since "ARTIFICIAL" is MOSTLIKELY well understood by humans, but not "INTELLIGENCE"... Is that a kind truth to bring up?

[@user-fu3ed5lg4u]

Isn't our intelligence also artificial? We know things by learning and most of the learning materials was acquired by others. It's not like we are born and know everything perfectly well. But I'm not intelligent enough to discuss about intelligence, just a thought.