Damping of Simple Harmonic Motion (not DAMPENING, silly, it might mold!) | Doc Physics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 155

  • @harryfu6852
    @harryfu6852 5 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    3rd year in college and I'm still watching my high school teacher's youtube video haha. Isn't Doc the best?

  • @DocSchuster
    @DocSchuster  12 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Thanks! I'm actually _supposed_ to be teaching this stuff, so I appreciate your comment!

    • @salmaalfawal6155
      @salmaalfawal6155 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's been 8 years and your video is still useful

  • @katherineli1335
    @katherineli1335 10 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I study A level physics and I find your teaching is far more fun than my teachers

  • @Bobasso
    @Bobasso 10 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    i respect the crayola markers.
    this guy is great.

  • @abdul-kareem4429
    @abdul-kareem4429 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This was very helpful for me. I was definitely searching for this kind of guy explaining this damping-thing. Good work!
    Edit: I wanted to add this: The explanation is precisely crystal clear. Thanks!

  • @Karlwojo1
    @Karlwojo1 11 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    this guy explains things so much better than anyone else!

  • @jcj1003
    @jcj1003 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your explanation is by far the best among all other existent videos out there. I don't understand why it only has 78 views. Thank you!

  • @DocSchuster
    @DocSchuster  11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You'll want to watch another of my videos from the same playlist and a video on exponential decay. The damping will only affect the amplitude decay envelope, so use the time to find the frequency. What does dismantlement mean?

  • @DocSchuster
    @DocSchuster  11 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You can clear up your damping questions with a quick trip to the wikipedia page. I wonder about your last sentence, though... If the system has a lot of energy, it will have correspondingly more damping force since damping is depends on velocity. I guess you'd need to know if your system's damping force is linear with velocity or quadratic or better. However, we've beyond a first-year treatment at that point. Maybe next year.

  • @JonitaChew
    @JonitaChew 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This guy made learning physics a whole lot more interesting and effective.

  • @oldfashionedman
    @oldfashionedman 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for making these! Really great explanations and the obvious passion shines through and makes the videos easy to watch and understand!

  • @hafizsofian6122
    @hafizsofian6122 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very easy to understand, and more important, it is refreshing and fun!! Keep it up!!

  • @sonysherchan
    @sonysherchan 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the fun way you are explaining this. It's very understandable. Thanks for uploading !! Keep up the good work :)

  • @bencutter9084
    @bencutter9084 8 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Your voice is scarily similar to Ryan Reynolds

    • @jakesak5125
      @jakesak5125 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shoot, I just commented the same thing before seeing this

  • @ultimategoku8537
    @ultimategoku8537 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    hey man ur really funny and what u teach through ur videos is better than sitting in boring lectures. please increase the number of videos that u make for a topic so that we can go even deeper in the concept. Ur the best educational youtuber ive ever seen. keep it up . i hope u reach a million subscribers and get enough funds from youtube to expand ur videos. Could u make some more videos on chemistry specially on molarity, normality and titrations i never get these topics, please☺! It would be very helpful.

  • @McBirdec
    @McBirdec 10 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I wish you could teach all my engineering classes

  • @fatemahusain2529
    @fatemahusain2529 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dear Sir, I want to ask you a question regarding the systems;
    If the characteristic roots for a vibrating system has positive real value, the system response will be: a) None of them
    b) Stable
    c) Exponentially increasing
    d) Unstable
    Can you please explain your answer

  • @miles.aasher
    @miles.aasher 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are pretty good, when it comes to explanation of concepts you hit the jackpot!

  • @tiffanyk5259
    @tiffanyk5259 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You teach greatly. Thank you so much.

    • @tiffanyk5259
      @tiffanyk5259 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The funny sound you make is awesome.

  • @ReemAhmed-lu5sd
    @ReemAhmed-lu5sd 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are amaaaazing! Better than all of our college's physics' doctors.

  • @narasimhachopparapu4534
    @narasimhachopparapu4534 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks. You made me understand critical vs under-damp vs over-damp in terms of physics (not mathematical which I found mostly).

  • @yoshitsuna000
    @yoshitsuna000 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    very intuitive and crystal clear explanation , this is what some modern teachers lack :
    a mind

  • @praveensb4880
    @praveensb4880 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Havent seen such a teacher in my life!!! #awesomeness

  • @TMWBlackra1n
    @TMWBlackra1n 9 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Why aren't you my lecturer? Why?... Thanks a lot

  • @sawcodes3085
    @sawcodes3085 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love the noises you make in between

  • @armenbabikian94
    @armenbabikian94 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    man what a fantastic way of explaining ...you are awsome !!! (ALL MY RESPECT)

  • @G_Tarun99
    @G_Tarun99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super super super sir no more anyone super explanation it's very understanding this topic s very nice

  • @kazutokirigaya7518
    @kazutokirigaya7518 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    that sound really help me to memorize the situations lo. nice vid

  • @lilyjohn1222
    @lilyjohn1222 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you really made my day thanks alot :D ..u r a great lecturer & u made physics much more fun

  • @DocSchuster
    @DocSchuster  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank YOU!

  • @xela19961
    @xela19961 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks bro! You really helped me understand this subject. The examples made it easy to understand it :)

  • @geogaddi84
    @geogaddi84 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was so elegant. Thank you.

  • @tophat2115
    @tophat2115 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    how would you describe energy that is constant in a wave action, that is say how anchor chains tighten, then slacken as waves strike the side of a ship and then dissipate/recede?

  • @greenfoodpower6961
    @greenfoodpower6961 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Execellent video! Well presented!

  • @henrylu108
    @henrylu108 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are there any publications about active oscillation damping in motor control domain?

  • @elmcityslim
    @elmcityslim 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Critically damping can have, at most, one oscillation and it approaches zero slower than over damping:
    p = c/(2m)
    x = (e^(-pt))(C1 + xC2)
    where as overdamping:
    x = C1(e^(-rt)) + C2(e^(-Rt))
    overdamping will approach zero faster because both constants are naked where as in critical damping one constant has an x term with it. If you put a lot of energy into a critical system you can make it oscillate at most once.

  • @CarlosPerez-cl9qq
    @CarlosPerez-cl9qq 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i enjoyed the sound effects, they were very amusing

  • @asmareend1872
    @asmareend1872 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How would a car bounce after a bump under each of these conditions? (a) overdamping; (b) underdamping; (c) critical damping. Please back the answers

    • @asmareend1872
      @asmareend1872 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In a written form rather than vedio.

  • @luisvidana74
    @luisvidana74 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    BEST EXPLANATION EVER!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR VIDEOS

  • @jessleen1234
    @jessleen1234 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You! You don't know how much this help

  • @BenBaranovsky
    @BenBaranovsky 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I really enjoyed your use of magic markers. :p

  • @vikasadil5721
    @vikasadil5721 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best video I have ever seen thank you doc

  • @joshuaflackua
    @joshuaflackua 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:09 Full Metal Jacket reference?

  • @indytube4343
    @indytube4343 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But then why analog instrument is prefer under damped.

  • @maesmattias
    @maesmattias 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Just one question: how would you UNDAMP a(n) (under)damped harmonic motion?
    Let's say I have a bench on 1 (or 2, or more) spring(s) and I want to keep it on oscillation at a certain (in this case, low) frequency of e.g. 0.2.
    Not only the amount of force or energy but how to spread it properly so you achieve the same result for the next peak (or trough) as you would have with an undamped harmonic motion. This way you counterbalance the natural damping and achieve a nice harmonic motion again
    I have this project I got on my bucket list and I can't seem to get it out of my head, it seems!

  • @oyekantaiwo_obele
    @oyekantaiwo_obele 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great, but pls i need to know damping related to electrical circuits. types, conditions, significance and uses also. thanks in anticipation

  • @fredxu9826
    @fredxu9826 10 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    college textbook is all mathematics, but no physics;
    thx alot

    • @ML-ek5ur
      @ML-ek5ur 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      When you got Maths, what more do you need?!

  • @jeremymunsell
    @jeremymunsell 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent, but will you draw the phase space diagram? I am reading along with Marion and their phase space diagrams confused me a bit.

    • @DocSchuster
      @DocSchuster  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jeremy Munsell That is a great text and a great idea. Maybe this summer!

  • @user-rp4nz5lh6x
    @user-rp4nz5lh6x 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    fun to watch and amazing explanation! loves it

  • @devilhunter1555
    @devilhunter1555 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    i really love the slang and the sound effects

  • @otterpalmtree9994
    @otterpalmtree9994 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    a question:
    so you said with the case of critical damping, its the fastest way of returning to equilibrium, but you also said it never actually quite made it back to the equilibrium? is this contradictory?

    • @mzz7800
      @mzz7800 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Um take an example of hydraulic door system like sometimes it happens that it doesnt close completely but is close to equilibrium position i guess this is what doc really meant?

  • @sanowarashraf4325
    @sanowarashraf4325 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello..your tutorials are amazing...i would like to know how you make these videos...like what equipment do you use :) Thanks

    • @DocSchuster
      @DocSchuster  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Sanowar Ashraf I have a video on that: how to make educational videos on youtube or something like that. See if you can find it!

    • @sanowarashraf4325
      @sanowarashraf4325 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      could you kindly give me the link pls

  • @Ranaaa2011
    @Ranaaa2011 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    FINALLY UNDERSTOOD IT !! Thank youuu !! :D

  • @angelaanthony8914
    @angelaanthony8914 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for such excellent explanation!

  • @siddharththakkar5902
    @siddharththakkar5902 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you derive the equation of envelope of underdamping?

  • @jkanyce
    @jkanyce 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm taking a control systems course, but somehow I never learned about damping. Thanks for the vid!

  • @DVNreaction
    @DVNreaction 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what is b?

  • @suvashshrestha1731
    @suvashshrestha1731 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    During underdamped ,is frequency of oscillation constant??

  • @u2bed91
    @u2bed91 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    If was choosing a subwoofer for my regular cab truck, would I get better results from a sealed q of 0.65 (overdamped), or 0.87(underdamped). By better results I mean better sound quality, at least on paper. I tried 0.56, but the bass sounds too subdued (almost muffled). Don't know if going to 0.65 would make a noticeable difference.

  • @November378
    @November378 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent explanation, are you also having a physics midterm on the 19th?

  • @prateekgurjar1651
    @prateekgurjar1651 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dampenomg f depends on velocity cuz the more the velocity the more force will be required to damp the sucker

  • @omak7084
    @omak7084 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have a question if criticall damping = 1, under damping < 1, over damping > 1, if we want to substitute the equation for real numbers is (b) going to be 1, 1>, and 1< respectively of what time of damping it is?

  • @frankchietro6958
    @frankchietro6958 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot man. Great video

  • @Matthew-wz6sq
    @Matthew-wz6sq 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is brilliant. Thank you :)

  • @MrChristism
    @MrChristism 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    how we can find amplitude having times and dismantlement, in under damped example?

  • @javed00
    @javed00 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    well explained , thanks!

  • @EternalScary
    @EternalScary 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I subscribed before even watching the video just because of the title

  • @parashmonikashyap
    @parashmonikashyap 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    why does damping force depend on velocity?

  • @MontanaPreston
    @MontanaPreston 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done, thanks!

  • @fizz113
    @fizz113 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much! Everything makes so much sense now!

  • @oshinalagiyawanna24
    @oshinalagiyawanna24 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    OMG, this hit right home!

  • @komalioruganti6585
    @komalioruganti6585 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are just amazing

  • @loyanabdulrahim5520
    @loyanabdulrahim5520 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video but I couldn't stop laughing with the wosh noise effect lmao.

  • @chandus2496
    @chandus2496 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thankyou, made a lot of sense...

  • @09mr30
    @09mr30 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anyone else realise the 2Live Crew 'Long time' reference or is it just me LOOL

  • @ExistentialGojora
    @ExistentialGojora 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amplitude, A, as a function of time, t, is equal to the initial amplitude, A sub nought, times the decaying term, e to the negative ratio b times time,t, divided by 2 times the mass, m. Period.
    No stupid arbitrary spelling rules like, "except after c". I'll probably remember this equation for the rest of my life because it is a scientific, falsifiable fact. A person could figure that out, even if they lived in a different galaxy. I respect that. The downside to my way of thinking is that I can't spell my way out of a wet paper bag. I hate spelling.

  • @PaulBlxck
    @PaulBlxck 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Actually i laughed more than I understood the lesson lol

  • @greebuh
    @greebuh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So what if you're using water for damping...

  • @lahirujeewantha5208
    @lahirujeewantha5208 ปีที่แล้ว

    superb..love it

  • @soumyajitsarkar2372
    @soumyajitsarkar2372 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    that maple syrup part was amazing , lol

  • @multiversetube
    @multiversetube 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful, thanks.

  • @MuhammadAli-nh5nz
    @MuhammadAli-nh5nz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks you Sir !!! you make my concept easily >D

  • @aadityarajbhattarai46
    @aadityarajbhattarai46 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damping happens more at peak amplitude of position no?
    curve is really steep there

  • @armaansamani7818
    @armaansamani7818 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey
    Could you please emphasize on the S.I unit of damping force?
    Thanks!

    • @ajhhc
      @ajhhc 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was wondering just that. It seems that if the force is in newtons (kgm/s^2), and velocity is in m/s, you would need the constant b to be in kg/s, so that the dimensional analysis makes sense.

  • @ecea044gauravgogoi7
    @ecea044gauravgogoi7 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    whatever i learnt ,
    i enjoyed it

  • @samuelgard6790
    @samuelgard6790 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gotta admit, I don't comment on videos very much, but this was a great explanation man

  • @MyAulos
    @MyAulos 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here on the recommendation of my Physics teacher. She chose well

  • @SomeoneIsAlwaysMovingOnTheSurf
    @SomeoneIsAlwaysMovingOnTheSurf 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lol the amount if times I said "dampen"

  • @tobompakba2923
    @tobompakba2923 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    your voice is awesome, I like your voice😁

  • @adityakharbanda3290
    @adityakharbanda3290 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow this was good. thanks!

  • @rajshekarns3543
    @rajshekarns3543 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice you made it so easy

  • @allall02
    @allall02 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you, it was great!

  • @rifat6049
    @rifat6049 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    its octobet 2012 and we still bouncing

  • @happyjuliet_8
    @happyjuliet_8 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u so much. Ur awesome. Do post more about physics2 A2 level CIE ;) .

  • @adityakarki2914
    @adityakarki2914 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u sir this video helped me a lot.......

  • @Wayk123
    @Wayk123 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man i love you

  • @daviditsa9699
    @daviditsa9699 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks man! i will give you free virtual hugssss! :3

    • @DocSchuster
      @DocSchuster  10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll take three if there's no fee. The key, you see, is that they're free.

  • @masoudfarhadzadeh2667
    @masoudfarhadzadeh2667 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thats great ... thanks man : ) i really need that

  • @annamauroam
    @annamauroam 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I will definitely talk about the family of bears at my exam

  • @ummmohamed4019
    @ummmohamed4019 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wonderful