A jury of 12 can annul legislation, Regardless of what legislation they pass, that is why people influence law not by voting but through the Jury. This is the key how to beat them and showing them who is Sovereign. We have the power, we just have to learn how to use it.
David frazer-lewis In schools yes, not in the indoctrination centre's though, that kind of malarkey is a bowl of water to a rabid dog in the government sector.
When I was in school, it was taught. I did British Constitution GCE in early 70s. It was removed from our education system after we had joined the EU, around the mid 70s. I only found this out in the last couple of years. I had always assumed that it was common knowledge. Anyone educated in law since, has not been aware of it's existence. I would think that by now, there are very few left in law practices that are aware we even have a Constitution.
@@EIKLURAM Thank you. I believe Common Purpose has become rife in most institutions. I really hope Boris and Cummings can follow their plan to take a sledge hammer to Whitehall and the quangos. It seems as if NHS and Social services are also in their line of fire. Common Purpose is the most insidious thing to deal with and has far reaching tentacles in all aspects of our lives to our detriment.
May be Britain can again become a great example for the nations to emulate, if the sound majority manages to achieve that rule of law and constitution again.
I only accept the Magna Carta 1215, the claim of rights 1688, as they're not involving parliament, and can't be altered. The rest is contractual / commercial business, by consent.
Very good! but what happened to the Petition of Right (1628) and the Instrument of Government (1653)? The IoG is viewed as the first Constitution in the English Speaking World. Also the US no longer has a "Bill of Rights", even though everyone still calls it that, it is now a part of the Constitution (the Amendments). Also the EU is a Union, the same as the US is a Union. You are sort of arguing against a supposed unified Country that still does not exist (even in the US)
The WIKI describes the IoG as the first codified written constitution. That is incorrect. The Magna Carta 1297 is both those things, and is upheld by Petition of Right and Bill of Right,.
Definitely curious as to what happened around a handful of months ago that caused several people to comment almost the exact same thing about how the United Kingdom doesn't actually exist or something.. weird.. not sure what they're smoking but I want some. It's also a shame most of the comments are so sweaty and frothy in nature, righteously proclaiming how enslaved we are by the EU, which is also just utter nonsense. It's not surprising that people watch a few videos and suddenly think themselves legal scholars, the most woke and red pilled of our history and sovereignty to be found. Aaaannnyway, getting away from all that, this video is extremely interesting. I do, in my humble opinion, agree that we truly became a Constitutional Monarchy with the Glorious Revolution because while the Magna Carta is not to be ignored, reading it though you don't get the same limitations on monarchy and assurances of rights as you do with the Declaration of Rights; that the DoR is about the people, the MC is about barons. But I do disagree, again in my humble opinion, with the notion that EU law taking precedence is unconstitutional, because.. well firstly, I have yet to see an example of EU law which, if otherwise passed by the UK, would be considered unconstitutional; and secondly because we agreed to _consider_ EU law this way, to _consider_ EU law as superior to UK law. We agreed to be limited this way in the exact same way you agree to abide by certain rules while playing football. Does the referee violate your rights when he red cards you? No, of course not! You can stop playing that football game at any time, and indeed that's what we've just done, we left the EU and extricated ourselves from EU lawmaking. We still have certain EU-originated laws, like GDPR, because we chose for ourselves to keep them. We never lost our sovereignty.
Ha ? This comment for now only apply for those that are in Great Britian or may I say United Knigdom, My question is that do you have and Bill Of Rights.
On the government's website concerning sovereignty, it state that parliament can make or end any law, which is planely nonsense. I will be asking HM stationery office to remove the statement.
A constitution needs to be constantly updated to reflect changes in society otherwise we get bogged down in outdated laws that don't take account of technology or attitudes ??
When it comes to the fundamental right to life, right to sustain your life,right to enjoy the fruits of your labour, right to family life, right to own property & the property is protected from seizure from Government, right to live free from Government interference. That doesn't "get old" as far as I am concerned. Without those protections as our birthright, we have nothing. A Government that gives rights can just as easily take them away but our rights which are granted at birth, by our creator, cannot be taken by no man.
This video is good to watch and we live in hope that things were that easy. How many people are having to pay c.tax and water rates without their consent? Courts don't care about people rights as bailiffs will have overall say regardless of our rights. Ireland don't pay c.tax yet their country is cleaner and prettier than uk, yet we still are made to pay. We have no rights. Where are the constitution when people stand up in court unable to defend themselves? You have to be educated in this before applying it. We need the constitution at every court collecting debts that don't even have to be paid. People need them to help as words are not enough. People won't believe until they've seen it in action!
In summary here are the British Constitution’s main components: 1. The Dome - (Alfred the Great, 886) 2. The Charter of Liberties - (Henry I, 1100) 3. Magna Carta - (John, 1215) (not to be confused with the 1297 Statute version) 4. The Statute of Treason, Provisors and Praemunire - (Edward III, 1351) 5. Statute of Praemunire - (Richard II, 1392) 6. Act of Supremacy - (Elizabeth I, 1559) 7. Union of the Crowns (James VI, 1603) 8. Petition of Rights - (Charles I, 1628) 9. The Grand Remonstrance (1641) 10. The Coronation Oath Act (1688) 11. Declaration of Rights, The Claim of Right Act & The Bill of Rights (William III, 1689) 12. The Act of Settlement (William III, 1700/1) 13. The Union with Scotland Act (Anne, 1706) 14. The Treaty of Union (Anne 1707)
Thank you for your comment , although you miss out the most important laws , the Molmutine laws 400 BC . These laws were the basis for the subsequent laws we have today. .
So the Government cannot sign the British Armed forces up to the EU army nor contribute financial to an EU army without an act of Law which would need to Debated and ratified in parliament and approved by the Lords.
It is not a British constitution it is the English constitution British is a contractual agreement between England irland and Scotland magna Carta is English
John Bingley set me out on my constitutional journey 9 years or so back. From then i have read all the "constitutional experts" from Bagehot to Bognador - and found them to be better historians than constitutional experts. In fact i did win a Queens Bench Claim in the RCJ during 2022 [QB-2022-001744] focused upon Magna Carta 1297 [Is it Law or not?]. The Claim was not publicised, but as is evident enow, and will become more evident in the coming months, has had/will have dramatic impact. Mr Bingley, and all the others failed to understand the true import of the 1297 Charter: I.E. not one of them describes the Premises, as may be noted above at frame 8:19 >> 27, whereat the most important term (the second of two 'bookends' - between which the Clauses are arranged) is not even highlighted. The 1297 Charter provides: Is, the written constitution of the UKGBNI, as acknowledged by Petition of Rights (1628) and Bill of Rights (1688): Them three constitutional documents together asserting the RULE OF LAW upon those who would debate, design, draft and dispense rule of law (liberties) over the lawful Person (Subject). In short NO ATHEOS (consequence) ET ALIAS SECTAS (example) may legislate from within any premisses upon the premises that UKGBNI Sovereignty is found by. The restrictive-covenant-running-with-the-land-for-ever, which Magna Carta 1297 folds, was breached from 1849 to date - for the sake of greed and bad mindedness in equal measure: A negligence that will be repaired, else UKGBNI will become ever more lawless and fragmented at the whim of an unscrupulous, wrongly Ruling hierarchy and their illegitimate minions, who, evermore emboldened, today import all manner of repugnant constituencies upon the land and make assaults upon the Subject, with little or no regard for the lawful constituents of the land and the most excellent constitution that is theirs.
I have argued with various people over the years about the name of our Constitution in England our Constitution is the English Constitution which we share with Wales. Scotland has its won Constitution which is why they have a different legal system to England and Wales. Most people working in English Law today do not know how many constitutional documents there are that make up our English Constitution. Wiki list 47 of them I have found several more. Most people are pushed to name more than 3. The reason we are in this mess today in 2024 is that most Englishmen have forgotten they had a Constitution. Parliament is now just a talking shop and The Bank of England is the defacto UK Government. Labour and Tory are a Uniparty there is no democracy we are a Constitutional Monarchy. We have to all understand our Constitution. How many people know what the venerable Lord Holt said in his judgement in the case Ashby v White regarding taxes? Not many probably one in 100,000. The Establishment is getting away with TREASON because of your ignorance so do something about it. "The facts embodied in it and the circumstances giving rise to them were buried or misunderstood. The underlying idea of the sovereignty of the Law, long existent in feudal custom, was raised by it into a doctrine for the national State. And when in subsequent ages the State, SWOLLEN WITH ITS OWN AUTHORITY, has attempted to ride roughshod over the Rights or Liberties of the Subject it is to this doctrine (Magna Carta) that appeal has again and again been made, and never as yet, without success." Winston Churchill (Churchill, A History of the English-Speaking Peoples (1956)
Tommy rot! The act of the union transferred all of the rights an Englishman has & all of the statutes to every dominion of the crown. The UK obviously, Canada, US, Australia, New Zealand, Gibraltar etc etc.
Magna carta 1215 is forever binding it predates parliament they have no rights to change it all. Others are against the original... Article 61 of 1215 is in effect has been since 2001 look up peers petition Queen on Europe 23rd March 2001
+james peirce: From what I can gather our freedom & rights go much deeper and are much older. There is a law outlining our God given freedoms from 4th century bc by a King Molmutius and reaffirmed in the 9th century ad by Alfred called "The Molmutine Laws" that have never been repealed as to do so takes a unanimous vote by the people. It gives every freeman the right to land(5 acres to use productively), equality, access to justice.... and much more.. Check it out(but not on wiki!)..... peace
+james peirce I'm not an expert on British Constitutional law, but I do know quite a few things on the EU. If I'm not mistaken, the EU is a treaty and therefore a contract. When the UK joined, it signed the contract and hence agreed to transfer some of its sovereignty to the EU, thus giving it authority on some legal topics.
+Mysterious Squirrel They have a duty to translate certain EU law into UK law & failure to do so results in penalties. If a failure of our government to do this causes an encumbrance upon you then you are able to hold it liable through the EU. Therefore EU law certainly does impose on UK law & this is why you are seeing a referendum coming up soon regarding staying in the EU or not.
The Lisbon Treaty profits lots of people, therefore the British Constitution got shoved aside. Breaking oaths is the most common thing in the world. Here in the USA kids were sent to the electric chair even though the Constitution strictly forbids cruel and unusual punishments. Some people got 20 years in prison for possessing small amounts of marijuana. Edmund Burke wrote a great essay condemning oaths. He maintained that oaths don't hold people to keep good promises, rather they reinforce dishonesty, they condition people to become comfortable with lying, they lead people to believe that breaking oaths is an ordinary and acceptable part of human existence. Jesus said oaths are from the devil, Matthew 5. 37. Take the marriage vows, for example. You might swear to God that you will love honor and cherish your spouse till death do you part, but if your spouse becomes unbearably obnoxious, and you just can take it anymore, then people will find reasons to break their vows to God, and they will find reasons to be comfortably satisfied that God agrees with them that it is no big deal that they broke their marriage vows.
Wrong 😂 Parliament never was and never will be sovereign. They are just a bunch of crooks that our forefathers knew about and protected against in 1688.
This needs to be shared, and shared.
A jury of 12 can annul legislation, Regardless of what legislation they pass, that is why people influence law not by voting but through the Jury. This is the key how to beat them and showing them who is Sovereign. We have the power, we just have to learn how to use it.
😂
💯, exactly, the highest office is that of the ordinary citizen. The power of the people is far greater than the people in power.
@@darrenhayward5088 haha
Your silly, schoolgirl giggling just illustrates that you don't understand.
@@MagicBrianTricks
@@CHRISDABAHIA No need for the comma
Shouldn’t this be taught in schools
David frazer-lewis
In schools yes, not in the indoctrination centre's though, that kind of malarkey is a bowl of water to a rabid dog in the government sector.
When I was in school, it was taught. I did British Constitution GCE in early 70s. It was removed from our education system after we had joined the EU, around the mid 70s. I only found this out in the last couple of years. I had always assumed that it was common knowledge. Anyone educated in law since, has not been aware of it's existence. I would think that by now, there are very few left in law practices that are aware we even have a Constitution.
Beverley Homyer I never knew this m, I was born 1969 it seems like everyone in charge don’t like normal people knowing this stuff
@@beverleyhomyer5019 th-cam.com/video/oONbN7ps9Go/w-d-xo.html
@@EIKLURAM Thank you. I believe Common Purpose has become rife in most institutions. I really hope Boris and Cummings can follow their plan to take a sledge hammer to Whitehall and the quangos. It seems as if NHS and Social services are also in their line of fire. Common Purpose is the most insidious thing to deal with and has far reaching tentacles in all aspects of our lives to our detriment.
Bring back our constitutional Rights and once again make our country again a land of Hope & Glory
Lord Denning approves of this comment.
thank you so much for uploading this. i am doing comparative politics in transition and this information is very helpful.
May be Britain can again become a great example for the nations to emulate, if the sound majority manages to achieve that rule of law and constitution again.
Because I'am from America , that's why I have ask the Brits that question.
keep up the good work.
Can I ask one question ? What is the main thesis or point trying to be made by this lecture ? Just so I can understand it better. Thanks.
It’s waffle. Made by wafflers.
Beautiful! Esteem
I am a student and would like to reference this video if possible. Where and when was this conference held, please?
+Oliver Smith Conference was held in January 2009. Chairman is Roger Hayes who can be contacted at rogerhayes.bcg@sky.com
That “written constitution” consists entirely of statutes and we never consent to them.
I only accept the Magna Carta 1215, the claim of rights 1688, as they're not involving parliament, and can't be altered. The rest is contractual / commercial business, by consent.
Keep it going guys
Where's the audio?Can you upload again?
Very good! but what happened to the Petition of Right (1628) and the Instrument of Government (1653)? The IoG is viewed as the first Constitution in the English Speaking World. Also the US no longer has a "Bill of Rights", even though everyone still calls it that, it is now a part of the Constitution (the Amendments). Also the EU is a Union, the same as the US is a Union. You are sort of arguing against a supposed unified Country that still does not exist (even in the US)
The WIKI describes the IoG as the first codified written constitution. That is incorrect. The Magna Carta 1297 is both those things, and is upheld by Petition of Right and Bill of Right,.
I heard this cynical adage, that the"basis of law is physical force". So who has the greatest force?
+George10767 No legitimate authority can be obtained by force - only by consent.
@@frze5645 Authority can only grant power, consent is the key to right.
get used to it people we have no rights call the police we been robbed
Definitely curious as to what happened around a handful of months ago that caused several people to comment almost the exact same thing about how the United Kingdom doesn't actually exist or something.. weird.. not sure what they're smoking but I want some. It's also a shame most of the comments are so sweaty and frothy in nature, righteously proclaiming how enslaved we are by the EU, which is also just utter nonsense. It's not surprising that people watch a few videos and suddenly think themselves legal scholars, the most woke and red pilled of our history and sovereignty to be found.
Aaaannnyway, getting away from all that, this video is extremely interesting. I do, in my humble opinion, agree that we truly became a Constitutional Monarchy with the Glorious Revolution because while the Magna Carta is not to be ignored, reading it though you don't get the same limitations on monarchy and assurances of rights as you do with the Declaration of Rights; that the DoR is about the people, the MC is about barons. But I do disagree, again in my humble opinion, with the notion that EU law taking precedence is unconstitutional, because.. well firstly, I have yet to see an example of EU law which, if otherwise passed by the UK, would be considered unconstitutional; and secondly because we agreed to _consider_ EU law this way, to _consider_ EU law as superior to UK law. We agreed to be limited this way in the exact same way you agree to abide by certain rules while playing football. Does the referee violate your rights when he red cards you? No, of course not! You can stop playing that football game at any time, and indeed that's what we've just done, we left the EU and extricated ourselves from EU lawmaking. We still have certain EU-originated laws, like GDPR, because we chose for ourselves to keep them. We never lost our sovereignty.
Super interesting !
:-)
Look at how all the fires seem to have destroyed this old history.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_Chronicle#Winchester_Chronicle
I think someone has our original documents. Likely to be the enemies of England.
Britain doesn't have a constitution England as a constitution Scotland as Roman law Wales shares England's constitution as does N Ireland 🍔
Ha ? This comment for now only apply for those that are in Great Britian or may I say United Knigdom, My question is that do you have and Bill Of Rights.
23 ,
🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸hay bud🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸23 huh im a 32 so this is why your a di#$ to me lol
On the government's website concerning sovereignty, it state that parliament can make or end any law, which is planely nonsense.
I will be asking HM stationery office to remove the statement.
A constitution needs to be constantly updated to reflect changes in society otherwise we get bogged down in outdated laws that don't take account of technology or attitudes ??
When it comes to the fundamental right to life, right to sustain your life,right to enjoy the fruits of your labour, right to family life, right to own property & the property is protected from seizure from Government, right to live free from Government interference. That doesn't "get old" as far as I am concerned. Without those protections as our birthright, we have nothing. A Government that gives rights can just as easily take them away but our rights which are granted at birth, by our creator, cannot be taken by no man.
@@ThePp12345678 because they are "INALIENABLE" rights
Universality must transcend fads of trends.
@@ThePp12345678 If that were the case then we wouldn't need judiciaries
This video is good to watch and we live in hope that things were that easy. How many people are having to pay c.tax and water rates without their consent? Courts don't care about people rights as bailiffs will have overall say regardless of our rights. Ireland don't pay c.tax yet their country is cleaner and prettier than uk, yet we still are made to pay. We have no rights. Where are the constitution when people stand up in court unable to defend themselves? You have to be educated in this before applying it. We need the constitution at every court collecting debts that don't even have to be paid. People need them to help as words are not enough. People won't believe until they've seen it in action!
In summary here are the British Constitution’s main components:
1. The Dome - (Alfred the Great, 886)
2. The Charter of Liberties - (Henry I, 1100)
3. Magna Carta - (John, 1215) (not to be confused with the 1297 Statute version)
4. The Statute of Treason, Provisors and Praemunire - (Edward III, 1351)
5. Statute of Praemunire - (Richard II, 1392)
6. Act of Supremacy - (Elizabeth I, 1559)
7. Union of the Crowns (James VI, 1603)
8. Petition of Rights - (Charles I, 1628)
9. The Grand Remonstrance (1641)
10. The Coronation Oath Act (1688)
11. Declaration of Rights, The Claim of Right Act & The Bill of Rights (William III, 1689)
12. The Act of Settlement (William III, 1700/1)
13. The Union with Scotland Act (Anne, 1706)
14. The Treaty of Union (Anne 1707)
P K Like
Thank you for your comment , although you miss out the most important laws , the Molmutine laws 400 BC . These laws were the basis for the subsequent laws we have today. .
So the Government cannot sign the British Armed forces up to the EU army nor contribute financial to an EU army without an act of Law which would need to Debated and ratified in parliament and approved by the Lords.
There's an "EU army"? Where?
Fantastic talk by John Bingley. Very glad I found this video. Thank you.
It is not a British constitution it is the English constitution British is a contractual agreement between England irland and Scotland magna Carta is English
2014: Parliament has too much power 2020: You ain't seen nothing yet!
John Bingley set me out on my constitutional journey 9 years or so back. From then i have read all the "constitutional experts" from Bagehot to Bognador - and found them to be better historians than constitutional experts. In fact i did win a Queens Bench Claim in the RCJ during 2022 [QB-2022-001744] focused upon Magna Carta 1297 [Is it Law or not?]. The Claim was not publicised, but as is evident enow, and will become more evident in the coming months, has had/will have dramatic impact. Mr Bingley, and all the others failed to understand the true import of the 1297 Charter: I.E. not one of them describes the Premises, as may be noted above at frame 8:19 >> 27, whereat the most important term (the second of two 'bookends' - between which the Clauses are arranged) is not even highlighted. The 1297 Charter provides: Is, the written constitution of the UKGBNI, as acknowledged by Petition of Rights (1628) and Bill of Rights (1688): Them three constitutional documents together asserting the RULE OF LAW upon those who would debate, design, draft and dispense rule of law (liberties) over the lawful Person (Subject). In short NO ATHEOS (consequence) ET ALIAS SECTAS (example) may legislate from within any premisses upon the premises that UKGBNI Sovereignty is found by. The restrictive-covenant-running-with-the-land-for-ever, which Magna Carta 1297 folds, was breached from 1849 to date - for the sake of greed and bad mindedness in equal measure: A negligence that will be repaired, else UKGBNI will become ever more lawless and fragmented at the whim of an unscrupulous, wrongly Ruling hierarchy and their illegitimate minions, who, evermore emboldened, today import all manner of repugnant constituencies upon the land and make assaults upon the Subject, with little or no regard for the lawful constituents of the land and the most excellent constitution that is theirs.
Pity we don’t have true democracy
brilliant thank you...
I have argued with various people over the years about the name of our Constitution in England our Constitution is the English Constitution which we share with Wales. Scotland has its won Constitution which is why they have a different legal system to England and Wales.
Most people working in English Law today do not know how many constitutional documents there are that make up our English Constitution. Wiki list 47 of them I have found several more. Most people are pushed to name more than 3.
The reason we are in this mess today in 2024 is that most Englishmen have forgotten they had a Constitution. Parliament is now just a talking shop and The Bank of England is the defacto UK Government. Labour and Tory are a Uniparty there is no democracy we are a Constitutional Monarchy. We have to all understand our Constitution. How many people know what the venerable Lord Holt said in his judgement in the case Ashby v White regarding taxes? Not many probably one in 100,000. The Establishment is getting away with TREASON because of your ignorance so do something about it.
"The facts embodied in it and the circumstances giving rise to them were buried or misunderstood. The underlying idea of the sovereignty of the Law, long existent in feudal custom, was raised by it into a doctrine for the national State. And when in subsequent ages the State, SWOLLEN WITH ITS OWN AUTHORITY, has attempted to ride roughshod over the Rights or Liberties of the Subject it is to this doctrine (Magna Carta) that appeal has again and again been made, and never as yet,
without success."
Winston Churchill (Churchill, A History of the English-Speaking Peoples (1956)
There is no BRITISH constitution there is an English constitution
Exactly!
Tommy rot! The act of the union transferred all of the rights an Englishman has & all of the statutes to every dominion of the crown. The UK obviously, Canada, US, Australia, New Zealand, Gibraltar etc etc.
Magna carta 1215 is forever binding it predates parliament they have no rights to change it all. Others are against the original... Article 61 of 1215 is in effect has been since 2001 look up peers petition Queen on Europe 23rd March 2001
I don’t consent to it as it’s a statute.
So the EU cannot change our Laws or impose their own ?
james peirce No but hey have tricked people into thinking they can. Its all deception.
+james peirce: From what I can gather our freedom & rights go much deeper and are much older. There is a law outlining our God given freedoms from 4th century bc by a King Molmutius and reaffirmed in the 9th century ad by Alfred called "The Molmutine Laws" that have never been repealed as to do so takes a unanimous vote by the people. It gives every freeman the right to land(5 acres to use productively), equality, access to justice.... and much more.. Check it out(but not on wiki!)..... peace
+james peirce I'm not an expert on British Constitutional law, but I do know quite a few things on the EU. If I'm not mistaken, the EU is a treaty and therefore a contract. When the UK joined, it signed the contract and hence agreed to transfer some of its sovereignty to the EU, thus giving it authority on some legal topics.
+John Randles When you say 'they have tricked people', you mean the British Government and the EU Parliament have colluded to trick the people.
+Mysterious Squirrel They have a duty to translate certain EU law into UK law & failure to do so results in penalties. If a failure of our government to do this causes an encumbrance upon you then you are able to hold it liable through the EU. Therefore EU law certainly does impose on UK law & this is why you are seeing a referendum coming up soon regarding staying in the EU or not.
The Lisbon Treaty profits lots of people, therefore the British Constitution got shoved aside. Breaking oaths is the most common thing in the world. Here in the USA kids were sent to the electric chair even though the Constitution strictly forbids cruel and unusual punishments. Some people got 20 years in prison for possessing small amounts of marijuana.
Edmund Burke wrote a great essay condemning oaths. He maintained that oaths don't hold people to keep good promises, rather they reinforce dishonesty, they condition people to become comfortable with lying, they lead people to believe that breaking oaths is an ordinary and acceptable part of human existence. Jesus said oaths are from the devil, Matthew 5. 37. Take the marriage vows, for example. You might swear to God that you will love honor and cherish your spouse till death do you part, but if your spouse becomes unbearably obnoxious, and you just can take it anymore, then people will find reasons to break their vows to God, and they will find reasons to be comfortably satisfied that God agrees with them that it is no big deal that they broke their marriage vows.
Peter Hitchens’ book The Abolition of Britain brought me here….
Excellent work good 🙏😁
The UK Constitution is quite simple, and you dont need to watch an hour long video. Two words, Parliamentary Sovereignty.
Wrong 😂 Parliament never was and never will be sovereign. They are just a bunch of crooks that our forefathers knew about and protected against in 1688.
@@Prem252ier The Bill of Rights? Its an Act like any other Act of Parliament. Has been changed and can be changed 🤣
Why would they have law protecting the constitution if we never had one
🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸gess who🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸