Every time there is a comparison with a real professional camera, you realise that smartphones are not close. Even though they may appear to be close, and may even have a better dynamic range, and may be "technically" better, they are not better. A professional camera creates a different atmosphere; real depth, and effortless detail.
@keithbajracharya8875 Yes. With the current technological branch they reached the the top. That's why there is barely any improvement, and I'm not a big fan of using "AI" to create fake images, like the Chinese flagships like to do.
Samsung has consistently impressed me with the exceptional quality and vibrancy of its photos and videos, and this comparison further solidifies its position as a leader in smartphone photography. While I felt that the shot featuring the chandelier fell slightly short of the high standard set by Samsung, every other image and video outshone its counterpart from the iPhone. The level of detail, color accuracy, and dynamic range demonstrated by Samsung is truly remarkable. In my view, Samsung remains unparalleled as the best all-rounder in the smartphone industry, delivering outstanding performance across various scenarios and proving itself as a superior choice for those who value top-tier multimedia capabilities 🗿❤️
Samsung does not do much processing on the image. It does not have a problem with the contrast being lower, but better than the unreal details in the iPhone. I do not like Apple’s approach in the last two years in processing images. As for the video aspect, the iPhone excels by a slight margin, and not in all circumstances
Please Techmo, keep yourself true to reality, independent and as technically based as possible. Your channel is the only place i actually trust nowadays. Comparing chips, photography, battery range etc. I feel like everyone else is a sold shill, too afraid of making real criticisms. This is why your channel is growing.
As a guy who edits phone pictures alot for instagram, i feel like Samsung puts the best hardware but in the end they commit a few grotesque photographic mistakes with the post processing that can break the deal for me. (Which they can correct rather easily for future phones) Over saturation, excessive shadow lifting and over sharpening. I've compared the iPhone 16 PM with the entire S24 line, and even added my old S9+ into the mix and the differences are surprising: Samsung was truer to source back then and the way they boost dark areas and grains small details sometimes render their shots worthless for a quality editing later. Its insane how hard they deviate from reality sometimes to make things pop for a better wow factor. They need to start thinking a little more like Sony in this department, which simply try to be as neutral as possible, that generates way better pics for edits.
The truth is that this 90% users doesn't have time to edit their photo and those samsung photos fill those gaps. As it's ready to post , that's why log on iphone didn't increase the sell as most users are not professional photographers to use the feature. And any professional photographers already have camera . Please let samsung keep their photos pop as that's why when I take photos at occasions everyone want me to send them the photos I took. They just want nicer looking photo and this days samsung did great at keeping true to life colors.
@@esoghumedominic13 Dude, once i took a picture of a dark red object (Rosso Fiorano color) in a lit showroom and the S24U "corrected" it to a screaming rose red. It was simply the wrong color, i had to take the picture with an iphone 16pm to import it. Making a nice looking photo doesn't mean that you need to exagerate the saturation so hard, also, the grain added given to over-sharpening doesn't make it "pop" for the more average user, its just a side-effect for something that doesn't help at all. And it doesn't even make sense: Why do you even have the 200MP mode that generates extremely large file sizes? to make larger prints/screens of corse! Then you actually enlarge it and it is grainy as fuck on the exagerated dark areas rendering the large file size still inadequate for such intended use case. Anyways.. Ok, in case you like that, there should at least an option to turn corrections away, which doesn't happen even in the pro mode. You say that photographers should have a camera anyways, many content creators and photographers click, edit and create directly on mobile platforms and use their cameras for larger format prints. This phone is an Ultra phone, it has the latest chips, large memory, best screens (S24U's M13 is inferior to apple's M14 btw) and even a pen that facilitates professional work. This stuff isn't only for doodling, this phone is supposed to accomodade more professional work too, instead of being just a fancy toy for casual users to play games and sign some documents. As an "Ultra" device, with so much focus on photograpy, there should be a neutral mode aimed at color accuracy at least and an SD card tray. Otherwise, its just a square S24 Plus with a pen. Don't get me wrong, I like Samsung and i own multiple Samsung devices but its true that they are losing their identity pursuing the quest of copying apple in whatever they do. Samsung must get back doing their own thing.
@Lucas-ck1po i like how you point all this just toward only brand that still offer more . No phone gives accurate colors to your eyes, it's just a preference, with samsung turn down or off scene optimization and you get photo straight to what you see or can use pro mode to get exactly what you want. 200mp is for more details and processing is what create noise depending on the main focus point. Phone has 2 option smooth or sharpen/ high contrast which likely to create noise when zoom In. You are clearly iphone fan. But I'm here to find best phone for my money
@@esoghumedominic13 No, im not an "iPhone fan" or anything fan. I just tested the mentioned devices myself. Why is it, when someone criticize or point certain flaws in a certain product people say these things? i don't get it. People criticizing these products is what forces these juggernault companies to decrease 5% in their profit margins to produce a significantly better product for us. Samsung was all happy seeling that absurd Exynos processor in their S24's all over the world, a chipset that scored behind every single 2024 device, from Xiaomi, Huawei, Apple, Sony, Pixel, even some Motorola devices, and they tried shilling youtubers to push the agenda _"You wont notice! it performs almost the same as the Snapdragon model!"_ when actual independent testers revealed the thing was like 15-25% behind in efficiency in some tests. (i have an S24 plus and can confirm its inneficiency). And guess what, Samsung is quiting their bullshit and the S25 lineup is coming entirely Snapdragon Elite. Why? because people weren't so afraid of testing it, made a fuss about it (rightfully so) and it hurt the sales and the image of the company. There are TH-camrs commenting about the internal Samsung crisis and some even corelate the Exynos cost cutting to their crisis. But this only happens when people stop this cult-like corporate worship. These people ain't your friends. Does this mean i hate samsung? No. I have a Samsung TV, a washing machine, 3X Samsung smarphones (work, personal, test/development platform etc). And whenever i have to handle an iPhone i just want to throw it at the fucking wall, their OS is dirty, navigation and customization sucks but i know the strengths and weaknesses of them. My rants have been aimed towards Samsung's willingness to sacrifice what built them up in the first place to become an "Android-like Apple" and the excessive post processing when it comes to camera app. Its so short of greatness there. Im not afraid of criticizing stuff for the better. And i still think that for the right price, the S24 Plus (Snapdragon) and S24U are the best devices overall currently in the market. But they could see (easy win-win) improvements.
He's right tho This is like taking a selfie and a software cropping/pasting Henry Cavill over me _"Tadah! you see, the pictures are always great in this phone!"_ This AI crap Samsung puts in there makes me not trust it lol
Could you do a video like this with the Vivo x200 pro and the Xiaomi 14 ultra? Since those phones have cameras which were co-engineered with actual camera companies.
📍⚠️Clarification on moon 🌙 photo : Yes Galaxy use AI enhancement for zoomed shots but not like totally fake moon. it enhances the image data processing ( for proof testing, i have tested with Manual Video Mode where no AI or Processing done on my galaxy s23 ultra & took the moon video shot on 20x zoom & guess what it took the natural moon shot. ) Hence its not a totally fake moon shot. ( You can also test it yourself using Manual Mode )
Aside from my reply on the moon photo...a great review!! Really liked the comparison. Though, using a sony doesn't really mean you're capturing "true" colors - you're capturing sony colors. Maybe a later video could be with multiple brands - sony, fuji, ricoh, canon, nikon etc...anything that is closer to your eyes with these phones would be great
Thanks for your brilliant professionell vid here👍👍👍! It is nearly unbeleavabel how much better the Samsung is in terms of Video quality than the IPhone!! On a lot compare vids they still say: Like always the IPhone wins in terms of Video, they make 10seconds Video compare after 10min picture compare for this Statement . But I could see in this 10sec the S24 made the better Videos, never mind was the Tester Said… But for true, until last year and for over a decade of years the IPhones was the best in Video quality! This time ends with the S24Ultra! I choose a few days ago the S24 Ultra for me, (get a new one for 800€, still normaly 1449€ here in Germany) after weeks of watching nearly thousend comparesens of the Cameras between all flagships. Video quality is most important for me. And I am so happy with my buy. The S24U Camera is outstanding👍👌🙌!! And I am Most impressed of the Video quality. Often it Looks like it is a pro Camera Video of ARD or ZDF(Main Channel in best quality here in german TV) - unbeleavabel great results!! I love my S24 Ultra🥰👍👌!! (Sorry for my bad english 🤪!)
Other than the telephoto lens.... the iphone and galaxy have inconsistent results photo to photo regardless of scene. There is no way really pick a winner, as if you do the same test again with different scenes, the iphone may win out. It just seems to be hit or miss each time. No one phone excels at anything other than the telephoto on the galaxy.
Could you test hotspot performance and bluetooth range? I have an unlimited data plan and leave my hotspot on all the time. I also noticed my OnePlus 8 seems to have a very limited bluetooth range. However it will pick up GSM signal where other phones can't (iPhone 13 to be precise). Another thing, most of normal people don't need and can't afford a flagship phone, could you test more midrange or budget phones?
Hi , I'm planning to buy S24 Ultra from dubai for 64,000 12+256gb model. Or IQOO 13 for 52k which is best option for me. Main priority is Camera and Watching content. Please suggest. Your suggestion is a lot for me, please reply
Also make sure it is the global version, with the right model number, I heard the Gulf countries have their own version and have compatibility issues with certain features.
amazing comparison video. but i'd say iphone won the last point(the video). the depth of field is much better than the color reproduction accuracy, since color can be fixed in post but depth cannot be
Great video, great comparision. I am amazed with Sony FX30 because I am not much into real cameras etc... I personally thought that iPhone will win but results are here.
THE MOON MODE ON GALAXY IS NOT AI GENERATED!!! YOU CAN DO RAW PICURES AND STILL HAVE THE DETAIL! This video that "proves" that its ai, just used a picure that was blured in a way that gets reverted by the sharpening process. It is NOT AI GENERATED
Its not ai generated it only enchances the photo, and if you would rather have a photo that you will deleate cuz its trash, instead of one that is enhances mrwhosetheboss, explained this, when iphone does this you would not complain
How do i fix my S24 ultra from capturing grainy images when lighting is inadequate? User error or camera issue? Its really starting to get on my nerves so much so im considering iphone again but i HATE apple. Im new to android and will be the first to say maybe im naive. Or is there something wrong with S24 Ultra camera samsung deviated from in past models? Any advice please internet!
No way he gave the moon shot to the iPhone I rather have a shot that is processed a lot by ai but looks just like i remember rather than having a photo that looks like i took it on a 15 year old phone
The pro res part u are wrong, Samsung have raw mode which is better than ProRes, ProRes is a cut down version of raw mode, You know that, so you should have used the raw mode on an s24 ultra and you know that you can set your colors on your color grading stuff and let it stay there's, no excuse why you don't like raw mode and don't tell anybody that Samsung doesn't have ProRes, Tell them they have raw mode which is a better version of ProRes
this is from the web I wish all of you content creators stop talking about pro res like it's some holy Grail, When raw mood on Android flagship is way better For the highest image quality with the most flexibility in post-production, "raw mode" is generally considered better than ProRes, but ProRes is often preferred for its smaller file sizes and faster editing workflow, making it suitable for projects with tighter timelines or when needing to work with less powerful editing systems; essentially, choose raw for maximum creative control, and ProRes for efficient workflow and smaller file sizes.
Absolutely loved this video but I need to make sure you know that sometimes the iPhone doesn't use it telephoto lens when you do a 5x zoom. Sometimes it crops in 5 times from the main sensor. Just needed to be sure you knew about that so you can always make sure it's using its telephoto lens before you take a telephoto shot
![เป็นไปได้ไหม - WanMai [Performance Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Eh5hItD4Mr0/mqdefault.jpg)
Every time there is a comparison with a real professional camera, you realise that smartphones are not close. Even though they may appear to be close, and may even have a better dynamic range, and may be "technically" better, they are not better. A professional camera creates a different atmosphere; real depth, and effortless detail.
Also it will take time for smartphone to have that big sensor of dslr inside it. The comparison is unfair😆
@keithbajracharya8875 Yes. With the current technological branch they reached the the top. That's why there is barely any improvement, and I'm not a big fan of using "AI" to create fake images, like the Chinese flagships like to do.
Well you not always carrying your dlsr camera with you,smartphone camera is always in your pocket.
@@huaweia1a1 😂😂 you forgot to mention, huawei beating them the most in having the best possible google services 😄 😆😜😁
some of the photos I found phones did better job than actual camera :)
Samsung has consistently impressed me with the exceptional quality and vibrancy of its photos and videos, and this comparison further solidifies its position as a leader in smartphone photography. While I felt that the shot featuring the chandelier fell slightly short of the high standard set by Samsung, every other image and video outshone its counterpart from the iPhone. The level of detail, color accuracy, and dynamic range demonstrated by Samsung is truly remarkable. In my view, Samsung remains unparalleled as the best all-rounder in the smartphone industry, delivering outstanding performance across various scenarios and proving itself as a superior choice for those who value top-tier multimedia capabilities 🗿❤️
Try latest Vivo x200pro then
@@huaweia1a1 not on earth, only in China lol 💀🤡🤣
I own a s22 ultra and it's camera sucks. pics are worse than the ones taken by a s20fe
@ich4226 there must be a problem with your unit
@ich4226 you might have had to stick with the exynos version. She shoots noticeably worse than snapdragon.
1 year old galaxy 🔥
7:35 "I rather have the crappy picture that I took myself than the AI B.S" 😂👍
then giving point to iphone was most sh*ttiest point in this entire review
@@AnotherDay-ce6th🤝🏽
Lower the exposure in your ishit, you'll get the same pic; Samsung does it automatically.ishits😂
Samsung does not do much processing on the image. It does not have a problem with the contrast being lower, but better than the unreal details in the iPhone. I do not like Apple’s approach in the last two years in processing images. As for the video aspect, the iPhone excels by a slight margin, and not in all circumstances
Go with what you like
Please Techmo, keep yourself true to reality, independent and as technically based as possible.
Your channel is the only place i actually trust nowadays. Comparing chips, photography, battery range etc.
I feel like everyone else is a sold shill, too afraid of making real criticisms. This is why your channel is growing.
As a guy who edits phone pictures alot for instagram, i feel like Samsung puts the best hardware but in the end they commit a few grotesque photographic mistakes with the post processing that can break the deal for me. (Which they can correct rather easily for future phones)
Over saturation, excessive shadow lifting and over sharpening. I've compared the iPhone 16 PM with the entire S24 line, and even added my old S9+ into the mix and the differences are surprising: Samsung was truer to source back then and the way they boost dark areas and grains small details sometimes render their shots worthless for a quality editing later. Its insane how hard they deviate from reality sometimes to make things pop for a better wow factor.
They need to start thinking a little more like Sony in this department, which simply try to be as neutral as possible, that generates way better pics for edits.
The truth is that this 90% users doesn't have time to edit their photo and those samsung photos fill those gaps. As it's ready to post , that's why log on iphone didn't increase the sell as most users are not professional photographers to use the feature. And any professional photographers already have camera . Please let samsung keep their photos pop as that's why when I take photos at occasions everyone want me to send them the photos I took. They just want nicer looking photo and this days samsung did great at keeping true to life colors.
@@esoghumedominic13 Dude, once i took a picture of a dark red object (Rosso Fiorano color) in a lit showroom and the S24U "corrected" it to a screaming rose red.
It was simply the wrong color, i had to take the picture with an iphone 16pm to import it.
Making a nice looking photo doesn't mean that you need to exagerate the saturation so hard, also, the grain added given to over-sharpening doesn't make it "pop" for the more average user, its just a side-effect for something that doesn't help at all.
And it doesn't even make sense: Why do you even have the 200MP mode that generates extremely large file sizes? to make larger prints/screens of corse!
Then you actually enlarge it and it is grainy as fuck on the exagerated dark areas rendering the large file size still inadequate for such intended use case.
Anyways..
Ok, in case you like that, there should at least an option to turn corrections away, which doesn't happen even in the pro mode.
You say that photographers should have a camera anyways, many content creators and photographers click, edit and create directly on mobile platforms and use their cameras for larger format prints.
This phone is an Ultra phone, it has the latest chips, large memory, best screens (S24U's M13 is inferior to apple's M14 btw) and even a pen that facilitates professional work. This stuff isn't only for doodling, this phone is supposed to accomodade more professional work too, instead of being just a fancy toy for casual users to play games and sign some documents.
As an "Ultra" device, with so much focus on photograpy, there should be a neutral mode aimed at color accuracy at least and an SD card tray. Otherwise, its just a square S24 Plus with a pen.
Don't get me wrong, I like Samsung and i own multiple Samsung devices but its true that they are losing their identity pursuing the quest of copying apple in whatever they do.
Samsung must get back doing their own thing.
@Lucas-ck1po i like how you point all this just toward only brand that still offer more . No phone gives accurate colors to your eyes, it's just a preference, with samsung turn down or off scene optimization and you get photo straight to what you see or can use pro mode to get exactly what you want. 200mp is for more details and processing is what create noise depending on the main focus point. Phone has 2 option smooth or sharpen/ high contrast which likely to create noise when zoom In. You are clearly iphone fan. But I'm here to find best phone for my money
@@esoghumedominic13 No, im not an "iPhone fan" or anything fan. I just tested the mentioned devices myself.
Why is it, when someone criticize or point certain flaws in a certain product people say these things? i don't get it.
People criticizing these products is what forces these juggernault companies to decrease 5% in their profit margins to produce a significantly better product for us.
Samsung was all happy seeling that absurd Exynos processor in their S24's all over the world, a chipset that scored behind every single 2024 device, from Xiaomi, Huawei, Apple, Sony, Pixel, even some Motorola devices, and they tried shilling youtubers to push the agenda _"You wont notice! it performs almost the same as the Snapdragon model!"_ when actual independent testers revealed the thing was like 15-25% behind in efficiency in some tests. (i have an S24 plus and can confirm its inneficiency).
And guess what, Samsung is quiting their bullshit and the S25 lineup is coming entirely Snapdragon Elite.
Why? because people weren't so afraid of testing it, made a fuss about it (rightfully so) and it hurt the sales and the image of the company. There are TH-camrs commenting about the internal Samsung crisis and some even corelate the Exynos cost cutting to their crisis.
But this only happens when people stop this cult-like corporate worship. These people ain't your friends.
Does this mean i hate samsung? No. I have a Samsung TV, a washing machine, 3X Samsung smarphones (work, personal, test/development platform etc).
And whenever i have to handle an iPhone i just want to throw it at the fucking wall, their OS is dirty, navigation and customization sucks but i know the strengths and weaknesses of them.
My rants have been aimed towards Samsung's willingness to sacrifice what built them up in the first place to become an "Android-like Apple" and the excessive post processing when it comes to camera app. Its so short of greatness there.
Im not afraid of criticizing stuff for the better.
And i still think that for the right price, the S24 Plus (Snapdragon) and S24U are the best devices overall currently in the market.
But they could see (easy win-win) improvements.
2031 they say no more green dots.
7:33 what the fuc*k 😮 😂😂😂
This guy stuppid bro
I thought the same thing. Lol 🤦🏾♂️
He's right tho
This is like taking a selfie and a software cropping/pasting Henry Cavill over me _"Tadah! you see, the pictures are always great in this phone!"_
This AI crap Samsung puts in there makes me not trust it lol
I know right??. 😂😂 I was weak with that line. Lol
@@huaweia1a1 yes bro, I'm also a Huawei fan❤️
make another comparison of vivo x100 ultra with sony alpha fx30
Or X200 ultra
What I really took away from this video is to ditch my phone camera and get a real camera.
7:41 this is wrong who have stopped iphone to use AI 😂
i got iphone 16pro and im so happy with it for videos it does excellent
Please compare with Vivo X100 Ultra Or Vivo x200 pro to for this comparison
Could you do a video like this with the Vivo x200 pro and the Xiaomi 14 ultra? Since those phones have cameras which were co-engineered with actual camera companies.
Pretty surprised with galaxy's video performance. 🔥
nice one man. and all done under 10 mins with so many positions to compare.
Why there is no one making comparison between vivo's phone vs DSLR 😭
Thanks for a great comparison vid
📍⚠️Clarification on moon 🌙 photo :
Yes Galaxy use AI enhancement for zoomed shots but not like totally fake moon. it enhances the image data processing ( for proof testing, i have tested with Manual Video Mode where no AI or Processing done on my galaxy s23 ultra & took the moon video shot on 20x zoom & guess what it took the natural moon shot. )
Hence its not a totally fake moon shot. ( You can also test it yourself using Manual Mode )
Wow the S24 ultra not just hanging in there but beating the iPhone 16. Wonder if apple will ever fix the lens flair issue on thier phones 🤔
Do you use maximum optimization of quality and Scene optimizer ON, on Samsung?
Please use it if you want worse photos
Aside from my reply on the moon photo...a great review!! Really liked the comparison.
Though, using a sony doesn't really mean you're capturing "true" colors - you're capturing sony colors. Maybe a later video could be with multiple brands - sony, fuji, ricoh, canon, nikon etc...anything that is closer to your eyes with these phones would be great
Thanks for your brilliant professionell vid here👍👍👍! It is nearly unbeleavabel how much better the Samsung is in terms of Video quality than the IPhone!! On a lot compare vids they still say: Like always the IPhone wins in terms of Video, they make 10seconds Video compare after 10min picture compare for this Statement . But I could see in this 10sec the S24 made the better Videos, never mind was the Tester Said… But for true, until last year and for over a decade of years the IPhones was the best in Video quality! This time ends with the S24Ultra! I choose a few days ago the S24 Ultra for me, (get a new one for 800€, still normaly 1449€ here in Germany) after weeks of watching nearly thousend comparesens of the Cameras between all flagships. Video quality is most important for me. And I am so happy with my buy. The S24U Camera is outstanding👍👌🙌!! And I am Most impressed of the Video quality. Often it Looks like it is a pro Camera Video of ARD or ZDF(Main Channel in best quality here in german TV) - unbeleavabel great results!! I love my S24 Ultra🥰👍👌!! (Sorry for my bad english 🤪!)
Also concider you can tune the camera to get whatever look you want. It doame down to what phones want the default to look like
Great comparison. TY
A video with sincere and objective opinions. A good job.
Thank you!
This is the right comparison!
Great video as always. I would’ve loved to see the Xperia in this comparison too since it’s also made by Sony and is touted as close to a real camera.
Thanks. I actually made one a while ago for Xperia here:
th-cam.com/video/bXX_r34lWAc/w-d-xo.html
@ thanks for the heads up. I’ll give it a watch. Keep up the good work!
Everyone is different, but for me, I'd rather have accurate colors than anything else. Nothing makes me more angry that wonky colors.
I never thought Samsung can beat a pole in video
Techmo you’re the best! Can you make normal camera vs Pixel vs Samsung vs iPhone long comparison for the photos and zoom?
Finally you did something I asked you months ago, thanks
a 19mp camera would already be superior to smartphones, imagine with 26mp
Samsung lifted up the game with it’s latest software update.
Try with canon r5 mark ii camra please ❤❤❤❤❤
Other than the telephoto lens.... the iphone and galaxy have inconsistent results photo to photo regardless of scene. There is no way really pick a winner, as if you do the same test again with different scenes, the iphone may win out. It just seems to be hit or miss each time. No one phone excels at anything other than the telephoto on the galaxy.
IPhones still haven't sold lens flare issue
DHARIA smile is contagious 😊
Why didn't you apply some picture profiles on the sony camera ?
that U-Bahn looks so square! Wanna visit it someday
Try one comparison among dslr , iphone and Vivo X200ultra in future
Could you test hotspot performance and bluetooth range? I have an unlimited data plan and leave my hotspot on all the time. I also noticed my OnePlus 8 seems to have a very limited bluetooth range. However it will pick up GSM signal where other phones can't (iPhone 13 to be precise). Another thing, most of normal people don't need and can't afford a flagship phone, could you test more midrange or budget phones?
So that's the point of having this feature on your vlog as you giving discount for prospect customers who's buying iPhone...
Hi , I'm planning to buy S24 Ultra from dubai for 64,000 12+256gb model. Or IQOO 13 for 52k which is best option for me. Main priority is Camera and Watching content. Please suggest. Your suggestion is a lot for me, please reply
Samsung, but wait for Samsung S25 series 🗿
camera-s24
performance-iqoo
simple
wait for the release of s25 ultra, which has got the same chipset as in an IQOO 13
Too much difference...in india alsomst 1.3 lakh...OMG..
Also make sure it is the global version, with the right model number, I heard the Gulf countries have their own version and have compatibility issues with certain features.
amazing comparison video. but i'd say iphone won the last point(the video). the depth of field is much better than the color reproduction accuracy, since color can be fixed in post but depth cannot be
Compare other flagships in the same way
Galaxy S24 Ultra 🤙🏻 👏🏼
Austria looks really nice. Really making me want to go again..
Do both of you use Samsung phones?
It certainly is. No she is an iPhone user 😁
the moon pic from galaxy is not AI generated but you can AI enhanced
Want like this video but with vivo x200 pro and oppo find x8 pro
Pro camera doesn't exist 😂 pro cameraman needed
well for ai moon u could set intelligence to minimum in camera for pure shot without Ai
Great video, great comparision. I am amazed with Sony FX30 because I am not much into real cameras etc... I personally thought that iPhone will win but results are here.
THE MOON MODE ON GALAXY IS NOT AI GENERATED!!!
YOU CAN DO RAW PICURES AND STILL HAVE THE DETAIL!
This video that "proves" that its ai, just used a picure that was blured in a way that gets reverted by the sharpening process. It is NOT AI GENERATED
Xperia 1 Mark 5 -6 👌🤷??
Yes, but shutter lag?
Still a problem on Galaxy, did show it on other videos, I forgot to do it here.
Samsung has ND filter inbuilt ..can you compare it with real nd filter ..nice videos by the way👍
💝💝💝💝💝. Can you also compare X200 Pro? I really like this comparison idea. Viewers will get a better idea. Great video 💝💝💝
Can you also make a comperation video with vivo please
S24U 👑
Nice video
Its not ai generated it only enchances the photo, and if you would rather have a photo that you will deleate cuz its trash, instead of one that is enhances mrwhosetheboss, explained this, when iphone does this you would not complain
Nice video!
It'd be nice to add vivo x200 pro and sony Xperia
How do i fix my S24 ultra from capturing grainy images when lighting is inadequate? User error or camera issue? Its really starting to get on my nerves so much so im considering iphone again but i HATE apple. Im new to android and will be the first to say maybe im naive. Or is there something wrong with S24 Ultra camera samsung deviated from in past models? Any advice please internet!
Kindly check 50mp and 48mp shots on both phones. Human subject on samsung at 50 mp is not good. I'm using s24 ultra.
No way he gave the moon shot to the iPhone
I rather have a shot that is processed a lot by ai but looks just like i remember rather than having a photo that looks like i took it on a 15 year old phone
The pro res part u are wrong, Samsung have raw mode which is better than ProRes, ProRes is a cut down version of raw mode, You know that, so you should have used the raw mode on an s24 ultra and you know that you can set your colors on your color grading stuff and let it stay there's, no excuse why you don't like raw mode and don't tell anybody that Samsung doesn't have ProRes, Tell them they have raw mode which is a better version of ProRes
Galaxy💪🏾💪🏾
ALHAMDULILLAH SAMSUNG ❤
this is from the web
I wish all of you content creators stop talking about pro res like it's some holy Grail, When raw mood on Android flagship is way better
For the highest image quality with the most flexibility in post-production, "raw mode" is generally considered better than ProRes, but ProRes is often preferred for its smaller file sizes and faster editing workflow, making it suitable for projects with tighter timelines or when needing to work with less powerful editing systems; essentially, choose raw for maximum creative control, and ProRes for efficient workflow and smaller file sizes.
s24 ultra 👑👑
Galaxy for sure
Why ı watched this video after this sony camera ı dont want to use my phone camera (s24U)
Techmo thanks for another video. But TF is going on in comments. 😅
Are you persian? Your accent says this
7.35 ??????🙄🙄
Sony looks like pixel
Absolutely loved this video but I need to make sure you know that sometimes the iPhone doesn't use it telephoto lens when you do a 5x zoom. Sometimes it crops in 5 times from the main sensor. Just needed to be sure you knew about that so you can always make sure it's using its telephoto lens before you take a telephoto shot
So iphone sometimes forget it has telephoto lens . Thanks for this information 😅
Ultra king
All iPhone fans, please don't show me your face.
And the winner with unanimous decision is samsung galaxy s24 ultra
چند جا s24 بهتر بود
Dude the picture of the moon if you did your research isn't ai generated
He just an Isheep, just by looking his video, you can tell😂😂😂😂😂😂
fan boys crying....