i think structure of the interview was missing, many jumps in the interview leading to candidate jumping and assuming from one step to another. Cohesion of the interview was missing. Abdul - Microsoft S.SDE
Actually he was not able to answer it properly, even though he had an exposure but I cannot tell that this was the best interview for Azure devops , as he said that he have worked with Azure devops most of the time , but the way he was telling about the concept of telling about the answer it was not even feeling like he have worked on the things because now if you see there is no longer used as classic pipeline , and also if you have worked in sir anything you will be able to explain in very brief way, his work I don't feel like was much to the industry based whatever he told about maybe he could have explored more because if you see any experience person who have 6.10 years of experience and who have already worked in Azure devops mostly, I don't think so he will be only working on the limited part where he already said that he have covered as your divorce most of these parts, so I strongly agree with Abdul whatever he said it it his interview was feeling like he was missing something and it was not even feeling like it was a proper , we all know that the first step is taking out the code but he started telling in a very different way directly CI, you cannot jump to the CI until and unless you import the report, and the way he was telling is completely I have never seen a interviews telling like this is somebody have almost worked in the azure devops , Just a request to you if you bring something more to the life where you are making available for entire candidate and entire people who would be watching your videos bring something very generic, also bring something that is very realistic whose answers a very different and would be very helpful his answer cannot be helpful it was so I was feeling like he it was missing something something and if you are not able to recognise this then I feel that you need to learn more or expose have more exposure on the components and the things we have brought it out because this was not feeling a good realistic way, I strongly would suggest you that bring something where somebody have already worked on much of the part where you have interviewed here the interview were correct but he was not even able to answer a most of the aspect and he was telling many of the things wrong which was not even directly approved that you have not working as your default for almost all of the year for 4 years almost so please it's a request that please bring some of the interviews so so that those will be available for every people and if they learn from that they will get a better exposure I am going to dislike this video because this literally something not up to the mark, and if you are giving such don't bring a search of the worst interview where people will be watching it and will get a negative feedback what if they watch this video and they give the same interview and they give the wrong answer even they will face the rejection rate so instead bring something then we can bring those contains whose interviews will be very valid, so if you see your questions were so much good and so much easy but the way he answered was completely irrelevant which I feel that he cannot even considered for the second round no matter of time so who so ever he is please ask him to skill up@@LogicOpsLab
Sir i think this interview is easy and so short . I was attended one interview recently for azure which conducted over 1 hr . I am requesting kindly upload some well advance interview recordings. Thanks in advance
Sir thanku so much for the interview session,also one suggestion at the end can u also post how should an expected answer be given for the questions u asked
According to the interview I feel like the concern person has not worked on many of the functionalities and many of the terms of Azure devops, because the way he was talking about he was feeling directly that he was not even good exposure of telling the things in a proper way
It seems like he only has theoretical knowledge and lacks practical experience with actual deployments. If he had real-world experience, he would know that deploying anything in the Azure environment requires a service connection. This service connection establishes a necessary handshake between the Azure account and Azure DevOps, facilitating secure and seamless deployments.
Sir... Your videos are good.... While doing interview video request you to create video for lab to each question.... That will help easy to understand
Thanks a lot, will try!
Sir thank you so much kindly upload more on azure devops interviews
Thank you and sure.
i think structure of the interview was missing, many jumps in the interview leading to candidate jumping and assuming from one step to another. Cohesion of the interview was missing.
Abdul - Microsoft S.SDE
Thanks for the feedback. I didn't understand the Jumps part, can you please elaborate the cohesion part, as well. Would really appreciate it.
Actually he was not able to answer it properly, even though he had an exposure but I cannot tell that this was the best interview for Azure devops , as he said that he have worked with Azure devops most of the time , but the way he was telling about the concept of telling about the answer it was not even feeling like he have worked on the things because now if you see there is no longer used as classic pipeline , and also if you have worked in sir anything you will be able to explain in very brief way, his work I don't feel like was much to the industry based whatever he told about maybe he could have explored more because if you see any experience person who have 6.10 years of experience and who have already worked in Azure devops mostly, I don't think so he will be only working on the limited part where he already said that he have covered as your divorce most of these parts, so I strongly agree with Abdul whatever he said it it his interview was feeling like he was missing something and it was not even feeling like it was a proper , we all know that the first step is taking out the code but he started telling in a very different way directly CI, you cannot jump to the CI until and unless you import the report, and the way he was telling is completely I have never seen a interviews telling like this is somebody have almost worked in the azure devops ,
Just a request to you if you bring something more to the life where you are making available for entire candidate and entire people who would be watching your videos bring something very generic, also bring something that is very realistic whose answers a very different and would be very helpful his answer cannot be helpful it was so I was feeling like he it was missing something something and if you are not able to recognise this then I feel that you need to learn more or expose have more exposure on the components and the things we have brought it out because this was not feeling a good realistic way, I strongly would suggest you that bring something where somebody have already worked on much of the part where you have interviewed here the interview were correct but he was not even able to answer a most of the aspect and he was telling many of the things wrong which was not even directly approved that you have not working as your default for almost all of the year for 4 years almost so please it's a request that please bring some of the interviews so so that those will be available for every people and if they learn from that they will get a better exposure I am going to dislike this video because this literally something not up to the mark, and if you are giving such don't bring a search of the worst interview where people will be watching it and will get a negative feedback what if they watch this video and they give the same interview and they give the wrong answer even they will face the rejection rate so instead bring something then we can bring those contains whose interviews will be very valid, so if you see your questions were so much good and so much easy but the way he answered was completely irrelevant which I feel that he cannot even considered for the second round no matter of time so who so ever he is please ask him to skill up@@LogicOpsLab
Sir i think this interview is easy and so short . I was attended one interview recently for azure which conducted over 1 hr . I am requesting kindly upload some well advance interview recordings. Thanks in advance
Sure, there are 46 videos in the playlist. There are many such interviews that you're looking for. Kindly take a look.
@@LogicOpsLab Thank you for your response
Sir thanku so much for the interview session,also one suggestion at the end can u also post how should an expected answer be given for the questions u asked
Thanks for the feedback, mate. Will think about the series in which we can answer the questions.
According to the interview I feel like the concern person has not worked on many of the functionalities and many of the terms of Azure devops, because the way he was talking about he was feeling directly that he was not even good exposure of telling the things in a proper way
Thanks for the feedback.
Thank you for this
Thanks a lot for the feedback. Appreciate it.
It seems like he only has theoretical knowledge and lacks practical experience with actual deployments. If he had real-world experience, he would know that deploying anything in the Azure environment requires a service connection. This service connection establishes a necessary handshake between the Azure account and Azure DevOps, facilitating secure and seamless deployments.
Perfect! Thanks for the feedback, Anchal!
Can you provide pdf for list of azure devops question plz
Will work on it.
How to schedule mock interviews with you?
You can book it over here
topmate.io/raw_wish/431310
Is it real interview or mock interview
Just curious, how would that matter?
Selected or rejected?
What do you think?
@@LogicOpsLab rejected
@@sgaikwad6478 🙂