Measuring Angles with FMCW Radar | Understanding Radar Principles

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ค. 2022
  • Learn how multiple antennas are used to determine the azimuth and elevation of an object using Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar.
    By looking at the phase shift between the received signals of more than one antenna, the direction to an object can be determined. The accuracy of this measurement depends on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the radar system. Increasing the number of elements in the antenna array increases the angular resolution of the radar. With multiple transmit and receive antennas, a virtual array can be created which can produce the same resolution with fewer overall antenna elements.
    Watch our full video series on Understanding Radar Principles:
    • Understanding Radar Pr...
    Check out these other links:
    - MIMO Radar: TI Application Report: bit.ly/3NSDi9V
    - Algorithms to Antenna: Increasing Angular Resolution Using MIMO Radar: bit.ly/3MLuG3n
    - Radar Angular Resolution: bit.ly/3tuDLXF
    - MATLAB Example - Increasing Angular Resolution with Virtual Arrays: bit.ly/3MP28pP
    - Free video course in Radar Systems Engineering: bit.ly/3Qpb2xo
    - Radar Tutorial (English): bit.ly/3N3n1Oh
    - Want to see all the references in a nice, organized list? Check out this journey on Resourcium: bit.ly/3NSD82j
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Get a free product trial: goo.gl/ZHFb5u
    Learn more about MATLAB: goo.gl/8QV7ZZ
    Learn more about Simulink: goo.gl/nqnbLe
    See what's new in MATLAB and Simulink: goo.gl/pgGtod
    © 2022 The MathWorks, Inc. MATLAB and Simulink are registered trademarks of The MathWorks, Inc.
    See www.mathworks.com/trademarks for a list of additional trademarks. Other product or brand names may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @dirkl9652
    @dirkl9652 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I love it when a person can take complex concepts and explain them in easy-to-understand terms. You gained a subscriber

  • @mohamedaboelenein7727
    @mohamedaboelenein7727 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    How this amazing series has very few views is beyond me!
    probably because it's still new.
    Great job, thanks a lot!

  • @jamesdash3163
    @jamesdash3163 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    if there are more than one object, you get velocity and range of each object by FM, you also get angles of each object by angle FFT, but how can I know which angle correspond to which (velocity, distance) of the object

  • @vamsikrishna219
    @vamsikrishna219 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nicely explained 👍

  • @PabloA64
    @PabloA64 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Exquisite video!👍

  • @viniciusfriasaleite8016
    @viniciusfriasaleite8016 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good video!

  • @user-hy4nq1ix2z
    @user-hy4nq1ix2z ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for the amazing video!! This help my research a lot!!!!!!!!!! Thank you~~~~

  • @saqlainahmed4197
    @saqlainahmed4197 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolutely fabulous vedio

  • @emadibnalyaman8073
    @emadibnalyaman8073 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can we get the example in minute 10? the IQ plot for each transmitter?

  • @Abhishek-lz5uy
    @Abhishek-lz5uy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent topic. Really appreciate.

    • @MATLAB
      @MATLAB  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you liked it!

    • @BrianBDouglas
      @BrianBDouglas ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! I'm glad you liked it.

    • @Abhishek-lz5uy
      @Abhishek-lz5uy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BrianBDouglas trying to connect with you on LinkedIn.

  • @TheHarpanOnly
    @TheHarpanOnly ปีที่แล้ว

    What app you use to make the animation / presentation? Thank you

  • @usmanarif489
    @usmanarif489 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hos did you calculate FFT at 12:00, for Amplitude vs Sine(theta) graph?

  • @sebastianluscher2559
    @sebastianluscher2559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for that visualization. It helped me to understand the angle measuring.
    But I think you explained it a little too simple. At 11:00 in the top right chart, you show the "discrete" IQ values. If we have discrete values we can't do an FFT. We have to do an discrete fourier transformation (DFT). The results are also discrete so we can't see the continous SI-Funktion as you show in the bottom right chart. And here we are at the main point, the SI-Funktion is discret and the discrete values may not match with the peak of the SI-Funktion. A way to solve that is zero padding, where you add additional zero values to the DFT to display a more precise spectrum.

  • @AshutoshSharma-xb9ku
    @AshutoshSharma-xb9ku ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay i am going to copy this code ..... But Thank You for using this way of teaching

  • @SORRYgemio
    @SORRYgemio ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the great explanation.
    I hope you don't mind answering a question. At 10:00, should I take the FFT of the I and Q separately since each forms a sinusoid? And in that case, either I or Q can be used. Or should I take an FFT of the complex number of I and Q together?

    • @DonJuke
      @DonJuke ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would assume you would have to use both since the whole point of using IQ signals is to gather the phase component between the two signals

    • @lilprozen2
      @lilprozen2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You need to transform your IQ signal to a complex base band signal and after that, you can do your complex FFT.

  • @usmanarif489
    @usmanarif489 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi can you share the app code, I am trying to calculate the FFT as you calculated, but failing.

  • @sonuanirudhanv782
    @sonuanirudhanv782 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can anyone please explain how he got these graphics and controlling elements in matlab

  • @besserschreiben9481
    @besserschreiben9481 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    „Objex“? „horry zonnal“? "inner cept"? "inner ference"? "da dah"? Dialect hard to understand.