YES. i just noticed that too when I took a closer look at his photo thumbnail and recognized him from Github. He is the man. He wrote C# code that could run in kernel mode and another that could run direclty on boot up interfacing with UEFI libraries to launch a game without even an OS!!!!
So if I want to support the latest cpu extensions, maybe the best choice is to stay with JIT instead of AOT? It sounds like JIT is the one that can take the most advantage of the latest extensions across a broad range of cpus.
wait, thats the guy who made bflat compiler.
YES. i just noticed that too when I took a closer look at his photo thumbnail and recognized him from Github. He is the man. He wrote C# code that could run in kernel mode and another that could run direclty on boot up interfacing with UEFI libraries to launch a game without even an OS!!!!
Yup. I wonder if he will add manual heap deallocations to bflat and zerolib. You can literally make a uefi boot loader using that.
CosmosDb SDK, (simplified AOT version of) EF Core and Blazor web apps would be good targets for next AOT support.
would be nice if blazor hybrid can be aot compiled
EntityFramework - choice #1
Blazor - next :)
So if I want to support the latest cpu extensions, maybe the best choice is to stay with JIT instead of AOT? It sounds like JIT is the one that can take the most advantage of the latest extensions across a broad range of cpus.
But then again unless they are extensions that will benefit my app, AOT might be the best way to go. 🤔
Would be nice if links shown in tne end 😊were shared in description of the video
For example -- 24:42 did you check what you are showing at all?
great info
EF Core and Blazor web apps would be nice compile with AOT
MVC is not supported by AOT yet, that would be great addition for AOT 🤞
My team would love improved support for running .NET libraries on iOS and Android devices in .NET 10!
Thanks
Glad to see it is smaller on disk than Go. Keep it up, because I never want to use that terrible language.