Thank you all for speaking. I appreciate the your time and energy speaking on these topics. I couldn't tell where all the speakers were from, however their different perspectives are appreciated.
One needs to separate real from fiction - "property ownership" is the source of the lack of distinction. No one can prove from their creator (who or what ever that may be is between each individual and their maker) more authority than another leads to one reasoned truth NO ONE HAS AUTHORITY FROM THEIR CREATOR TO KNOWINGLY, BY THEIR WORDS, ACTIONS OR INACTIONS, TO CAUSE ANOTHER HARM. So real ownership can only represent individual thoughts expressed in our words and actions - this is all that we have personal ownership rights over(one can see the shift in global economies to IP which appears to be the evolutionary process rather than any active thought driving to that conclusion). Hence value can be no more than a representation of the fruits of our labour, and not real property that has been transmuted - hence man hours - past (savings), current and future (credit). Legally this is admitted in promissory notes!!!! This means any form of "rent" (any restrictive or monopoly privilege granted by society giving one person a "legal" advantage over another) forms part of the fictional "financial sector" and is not part of the real economy. Accordingly there must be a simple distinction between an instrument for trading as private individuals for "survival". As no one is responsible for another individuals well being (it being ones individual choice to help others), when society takes away one natural inherent right to survival then society MUST provide for this to those individuals whose freewill has been removed - that is the price of any form of assumed consent to govern!!! Then there can be a separate "money" for playing financial games!
Thank you all for speaking. I appreciate the your time and energy speaking on these topics. I couldn't tell where all the speakers were from, however their different perspectives are appreciated.
Tommorows world will belong to people you put in the money today
What about aworld linked with super freeways for supercars regulation into the high-speed electric world era aura
Optimum high electrifying speed utilization
ThankyouforThevideos!!
Inflation, is a pro, only when an economies' safety net is intact. Otherwise markets are likely to collapse; housing, food, clothing, etc.
Good assets are difficult to sell off
Data peaks are not an indications of massive poverty elevation programmes on contrary have quodrupled world economies worldwide
Now write book on following dictums to re regulate world economy
High speed unhindered financial transactions utilizing the high tech it sector to mitigate the world economy without regulations
Money should flow like electricity
Money has to be tranacted fast without lying for some time
People need to learn to speak into the microphone.
You cannot change anything with such lenghthy speeches
Ducky finances on top echeleons need to be re financialized by the nova rich bluechip companies
Noti gang
Instant finies
Huge liabilities requre to be sold off at a fast pace
Feed the backs so that they pay from the forefront
Skimming only the cows having milk in them
One needs to separate real from fiction - "property ownership" is the source of the lack of distinction.
No one can prove from their creator (who or what ever that may be is between each individual and their maker) more authority than another leads to one reasoned truth
NO ONE HAS AUTHORITY FROM THEIR CREATOR TO KNOWINGLY, BY THEIR WORDS, ACTIONS OR INACTIONS, TO CAUSE ANOTHER HARM.
So real ownership can only represent individual thoughts expressed in our words and actions - this is all that we have personal ownership rights over(one can see the shift in global economies to IP which appears to be the evolutionary process rather than any active thought driving to that conclusion).
Hence value can be no more than a representation of the fruits of our labour, and not real property that has been transmuted - hence man hours - past (savings), current and future (credit). Legally this is admitted in promissory notes!!!!
This means any form of "rent" (any restrictive or monopoly privilege granted by society giving one person a "legal" advantage over another) forms part of the fictional "financial sector" and is not part of the real economy.
Accordingly there must be a simple distinction between an instrument for trading as private individuals for "survival".
As no one is responsible for another individuals well being (it being ones individual choice to help others), when society takes away one natural inherent right to survival then society MUST provide for this to those individuals whose freewill has been removed - that is the price of any form of assumed consent to govern!!!
Then there can be a separate "money" for playing financial games!