Such a good video Terry, have talked to you on the phone many times and the way you explain the technicalities is amazing, i know its a big ask but please continue with these videos!! Would be great to get more tips on basics of front and rear suspension setup, would be so good to see some vidoes of how to correct or reduce some of the most common chassis behaviours / misbehaviors, im sure there are so many people out there wanting some help on those topics and seriously i don't think there is one video in existence explaining these very basics, im sure so many people are looking for some guidance, hoping this sag explanation video is just the start !! Brilliant.
I subscribed to learn more about newer suspension, I've owned and raced Dist. 37 Desert on a 1969 400 Cross, 1989 390 OR, 1985 500 XC and now 2106 FE 350, all Husqvarna's. Looking forward to evening out the flow of the stock suspension for off roading in Idaho. Thank you Terry for your simple explanation. Scott - CHECKERS M/C
I have the race tech book, but it was great to hear an explanation, thanks 👍. I'm riding a 2013 hd sportster as a dirt bike. Ohlins on the back 16". And WP on the front. Track and rack were very similar to my ktm 640adv. But the sportster has a shorter swing arm. Q: can you compensate for swing arm or force centre with sag in this case, if so higher or lower % sag ? (I keep up with a lot of adv riders, but it doesn't like chopping the throttle. If getting hairy neutral or slit throttle with balanced breaking works best. Then get back on it.)
You would need to have the right springs in the forks to start off with. Swapping forks can see a technology improvement but you may not have the ability to install the correct springs as the aftermarket does not cater for custom jobs. If the forks you have are from a dirt bike then the available spring selection will be to suit that dirt bike. You have a much heavier bike that also has far greater compression braking. Both things will promote easy front end dive. You can have custom springs made which would be my advice.
Watched this and the other two - not sure if you read comments or can reply here but do you have any tips for Supermoto sag? Not sure if I should just be cranking everything stiffer and quicker or not. It's tarmac only for me right now, so I am leaning into proportional sport bike settings with dirt bike measurements. Thanks for all the videos - very good.
Thank you for the video, you talk about getting the correct angle of the swing arm, would we be better off reading angles of the swing arm rather than sag then. For example we might want to aim for an angle of 78degrees
What we are trying to do is get the acceleration force driving through the centre of mass. Spring pressure will determine our angle for us and it should be governed by peak stability and forward motion. How much spring preload is required to achieve this ideal angle will also impact on suspension performance.....hence the need to achieve the ideal angle with the ideal spring / preload combination. The angle required will vary based more on riders height as opposed to weight. An 80 kg, 5'6" rider has a lower centre of mass than an 80kg 6'3" rider. Therefore a taller rider will require less sag in order to gain the same handling traits as a shorter one. I realise this adds another dimension to what has been an overly simplified concept from the suspension industry but if it is performance you are chasing, you really need to go the extra mile and test. These videos are to provide more information rather than greater convenience.
What kind of data collection happens on the bikes to allow tuners to dial in the ideal spring rates? I assume G, and throw distances can be measured in real time for each rider, then adjustments made for each track...
Yes....generally stroke position is a really good indicator as well as percentage of time spent in a particular travel range. Quite often people will use crude indicators such as zip ties or o-rings which will let you know how far the suspension has compressed, yet it fails to indicate "How Often".
I just answered "TwoWheelsInMotion"s question which will assist you with yours. Its not just weight but height that makes a difference to your requirements.
I've come up to speed in understand the nuances of suspension so fast since hooking into your videos. You're the man........
Thanks for your kind comment.
Such a good video Terry, have talked to you on the phone many times and the way you explain the technicalities is amazing, i know its a big ask but please continue with these videos!! Would be great to get more tips on basics of front and rear suspension setup, would be so good to see some vidoes of how to correct or reduce some of the most common chassis behaviours / misbehaviors, im sure there are so many people out there wanting some help on those topics and seriously i don't think there is one video in existence explaining these very basics, im sure so many people are looking for some guidance, hoping this sag explanation video is just the start !! Brilliant.
Well done Terry, regards from a long time customer.
Best explanation ever, period.
I subscribed to learn more about newer suspension, I've owned and raced Dist. 37 Desert on a 1969 400 Cross, 1989 390 OR, 1985 500 XC and now 2106 FE 350, all Husqvarna's. Looking forward to evening out the flow of the stock suspension for off roading in Idaho. Thank you Terry for your simple explanation. Scott - CHECKERS M/C
Best video about sag on the internet! Cheers!
Wow, thanks!
Great vid, Terry! Thanks, keep these videos coming. I always enjoy your technical explanations :)
Those frequencies at the end... Finally making me give a shit about my spring, since it makes sense.
Just found this. Amazing stuff… so, so good. Thanks for taking the time to do this
That was great thanks Terry, looking forward to the next videos.
Thanks for sharing! Really good video! Regards from chilean patagonia ✌🏽
Well explained! Also liked the subtle digs too 😉
Awesome! Thanks Terry!
Great video! Thank you
I have the race tech book, but it was great to hear an explanation, thanks 👍.
I'm riding a 2013 hd sportster as a dirt bike. Ohlins on the back 16". And WP on the front.
Track and rack were very similar to my ktm 640adv.
But the sportster has a shorter swing arm.
Q: can you compensate for swing arm or force centre with sag in this case, if so higher or lower % sag ?
(I keep up with a lot of adv riders, but it doesn't like chopping the throttle. If getting hairy neutral or slit throttle with balanced breaking works best. Then get back on it.)
You would need to have the right springs in the forks to start off with. Swapping forks can see a technology improvement but you may not have the ability to install the correct springs as the aftermarket does not cater for custom jobs. If the forks you have are from a dirt bike then the available spring selection will be to suit that dirt bike. You have a much heavier bike that also has far greater compression braking. Both things will promote easy front end dive. You can have custom springs made which would be my advice.
This guy is highly experienced, go and try and find some one that can actually verbalize these setting and forces into words
Watched this and the other two - not sure if you read comments or can reply here but do you have any tips for Supermoto sag? Not sure if I should just be cranking everything stiffer and quicker or not. It's tarmac only for me right now, so I am leaning into proportional sport bike settings with dirt bike measurements. Thanks for all the videos - very good.
Very interesting 👌🏻
Thank you for the video, you talk about getting the correct angle of the swing arm, would we be better off reading angles of the swing arm rather than sag then. For example we might want to aim for an angle of 78degrees
What we are trying to do is get the acceleration force driving through the centre of mass. Spring pressure will determine our angle for us and it should be governed by peak stability and forward motion. How much spring preload is required to achieve this ideal angle will also impact on suspension performance.....hence the need to achieve the ideal angle with the ideal spring / preload combination. The angle required will vary based more on riders height as opposed to weight. An 80 kg, 5'6" rider has a lower centre of mass than an 80kg 6'3" rider. Therefore a taller rider will require less sag in order to gain the same handling traits as a shorter one. I realise this adds another dimension to what has been an overly simplified concept from the suspension industry but if it is performance you are chasing, you really need to go the extra mile and test. These videos are to provide more information rather than greater convenience.
@@shocktreatment5495 Thanks for the follow up.
What kind of data collection happens on the bikes to allow tuners to dial in the ideal spring rates? I assume G, and throw distances can be measured in real time for each rider, then adjustments made for each track...
Yes....generally stroke position is a really good indicator as well as percentage of time spent in a particular travel range. Quite often people will use crude indicators such as zip ties or o-rings which will let you know how far the suspension has compressed, yet it fails to indicate "How Often".
this is great
What if you are a heavier rider and you don’t want a lot of sag?
I just answered "TwoWheelsInMotion"s question which will assist you with yours. Its not just weight but height that makes a difference to your requirements.
Sag is just a measure of suspension travel.
giving to much detail on small things. just send it wild.
First viewer lol
You can over analyze something to the point it means nothing. This guy just loves to hear himself talk.