Sir Richard J. Evans - Writing the History of 19th-century Europe: the Global Context

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ย. 2024
  • Sir Richard J. Evans (Cambridge University) gives a Lecture in the framework of Europe and the World Forum on 21 February at Villa Schifanoia

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @Gorboduc
    @Gorboduc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I agree with the question asked about the incredible disappearing Austrian Empire. I was reading Tuchman's Guns Of August a while ago, and she starts the book with one chapter each summarizing the war aims of all the major powers...
    ...except for the guys who started it. :/

  • @Malikin
    @Malikin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    31:13 A man of culture!

  • @themanofleisure7115
    @themanofleisure7115 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Evans starts at 8:30

  • @michaelbasher
    @michaelbasher 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really really interesting.

  • @AlbertSchram
    @AlbertSchram ปีที่แล้ว

    [22:00] As to the "European family of nations", the badly conceived monarchic architecture at the Congress of Vienna, and the tremendous forces for social and economic change unleashed by technological innovation and the 1st Industrial Revolution at the same time, caused a continual occurrence of rebellions and revolutions before and after 1848. It is a story of conflict and competition between states, it was not and could not be a peaceful century. Margaret MacMillan's conception that the First World War was the war that ended peace, is in my view ludicrous.

    • @joshwhite3339
      @joshwhite3339 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think when folks say "peaceful century" they mean that nothing occurred from 1815-1913 in Europe that resembled the Napoleonic wars, 7 years war, 30 years war, WW1, WW2 etc. I think the worst war that occurred during that time was an internal American Civil War.

    • @AlbertSchram
      @AlbertSchram ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joshwhite3339 With lack of peacefulness I mean the Greek revolution, Belgian Independence, the 1848 revolutions, the Italian independence wars, the Franco German wars etc

  • @1schroef
    @1schroef 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    9/11?

  • @firstal3799
    @firstal3799 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hate introductions. Irritating

  • @MikeDrewYT
    @MikeDrewYT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who is this tedious introducer? She seems bored or annoyed at having to do it.
    Miss, if you don’t want to do this we can look all the information about “Richard” up ourselves.

  • @intolerandus
    @intolerandus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The most contemptible sellout in British history.

    • @bigboybole4358
      @bigboybole4358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      okay thank you s easeß eztan we e are we asteswß we a eel we we rrß e

    • @althepalno1164
      @althepalno1164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So why is he so well regarded, and respected? Apart from whacky deniers, people regard him as an excellent historian. And a really good speaker too.

    • @slizzysluzzer
      @slizzysluzzer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Follow your leader

    • @Malikin
      @Malikin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      He does this pretty well and I think if you hate a historian, you might hate history itself, too.

    • @slizzysluzzer
      @slizzysluzzer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Malikin He's a Holocaust denier, of course he hates history.