Dear content creator, I have been blessed with your videos in terms of learning in an easy and fast way. Would you prefer any book which will be very helpful to learn more structural analysis ?
Great content, but I have a question. When loadings are applied to the member, the member deforms. Then, we use the deformation to back-calculate the bending moment acting on the member. However, at last, we further calculate the bending moment induced by the loadings on the member again!? Wouldn't this duplicate the value we found?
I personally think that taking the rotation in clockwise direction to be positive every time is not correct. Because if in the first case where we are studying theta(a) if we take the bending moment from the left end than if at x=0 we keep the theta(a) to be positive than we get a negative relation between the theta and end moments which is wrong rather the sign should depend on the behavior of the bending moment if that bending moment supports the theta than the theta should be taken to be positive like the case taken in this video whereas if it is opposite than take negative.
M_AB is what you are trying to solve for. the FEMs are if the ends of the beam were fixed-fixed. the FEMs account for the influence of member loading on M_AB.
Here's a link to part 3 a very detailed force (aka flexbility) method problem series that has 2 dofs and provides an intro to the matrix approach. th-cam.com/video/Vt8HH_A_QgI/w-d-xo.html
this is the greateset channel on youtube.
thank you very much for every minute of this video.
You are too kind! 😁
Really helped to understand it. Months worth of learning from textbook condensed into 1 video
Thank you for all the great videos! Please consider finishing the dynamics series!
Best teacher ever
My man! Good job on the instruction! Thank you so much.
Here I go clearing all of my friggin doubts! Thank you!!
This is amazing. I love seeing it happen right before my eyes and seeing the magic equation come to life slowly piece by piece
At 34:45 you said we deserve a medal, make sure my professor knows to give me one ;) hahaha
you are saving my academic life.
thank you! i was lost with the information at the books but here everything is clear!
Love from India.....You break the structure difficulties....Make more videos....Thanx sir
Dear content creator, I have been blessed with your videos in terms of learning in an easy and fast way. Would you prefer any book which will be very helpful to learn more structural analysis ?
Kassimali y hibbeler son buenas opciones
So nicely explained. Thank you sir
Would you please tell me how the shape of beam with both fixed-end deforms the way you drew?
Great content, but I have a question. When loadings are applied to the member, the member deforms. Then, we use the deformation to back-calculate the bending moment acting on the member. However, at last, we further calculate the bending moment induced by the loadings on the member again!? Wouldn't this duplicate the value we found?
Fantastic videos, really useful.
In what order would you suggest watching the playlists if starting from scratch?
Thank you professor you are amazing.
🙏
Thanks alot really i got from here clear understand
👍
You are the Best👍
What is the name of the device you use? It looks good!
I want to buy the same device that you have.
Dr. I want to send you my question, how can I contact you?
Good work
how can i contact you i mean it sir i have queries
I like before watching simply because it's structure freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Amazing
I personally think that taking the rotation in clockwise direction to be positive every time is not correct. Because if in the first case where we are studying theta(a) if we take the bending moment from the left end than if at x=0 we keep the theta(a) to be positive than we get a negative relation between the theta and end moments which is wrong rather the sign should depend on the behavior of the bending moment if that bending moment supports the theta than the theta should be taken to be positive like the case taken in this video whereas if it is opposite than take negative.
slope deflection equations are derived using a different convention than internal loading functions.
What exactly is the difference between M(AB) and FEM(AB)?
Thanks
the letters...jk
M_AB is what you are trying to solve for. the FEMs are if the ends of the beam were fixed-fixed. the FEMs account for the influence of member loading on M_AB.
@@structurefree thanks
please make tutorial on steel structure
Do a vedio on flexibility matrix methods
Here's a link to part 3 a very detailed force (aka flexbility) method problem series that has 2 dofs and provides an intro to the matrix approach.
th-cam.com/video/Vt8HH_A_QgI/w-d-xo.html