Why is every report talking about the bird strike. The plane landed on its belly with wings level. The deaths were caused by the concrete wall at the end of the runway. Whoever ok'd that decision should be locked up.
Because they are looking for a cause. The end result is the crash into a brick wall, but learning about the series of events that led up to that point is quite obviously crucial in helping to prevent what happened again in the future. The bird strike could have damaged the hydraulic systems responsible for the undercarriage. However, maybe the pilots in their panic did not check if the undercarriage had indeed lowered or not. There are so many factors, we will just have to wait for the investigation to conclude.
The concrete wall seems very much to have been a big factor, but that plane was coming down fast near the end of the runway, it would have been in trouble even without the wall.
Why has the media avoided reporting the same landing gear failure of a KLM plane crash in Norway a few hours after so korea crash...thankfully all passengers survived. KLMs landing gear hydraulics failed too...and not by a bird. It was a Boeing 737 too....
Well, they didn’t avoid reporting it - simply, being with no injuries (not even a sprained ankle) it’s clearly less of a news. About the fact that these happened at a few hours difference is obviously purely by chance
bad day for landing gear crashs within 24 hrs! so korea, KLM and canada..all crash landing due to landing gear failure! KLM lost hydraulic power and crash landed...all passengers survived..both planes are Boeing 737s..is there a connection?
Let's not forget that the localizer antennas were mounted on top of a massive concrete block just after the end of the runway, instead of being placed on the ground where they belonged. This concrete block gives absolutely no chance for airplanes should they for any reason experience a runway excursion on landing or aborted take-off. There is a thing called a "clearway" in airport design, and it is there for a reason. Whoever elected to mount the localizer antennas on top of a massive concrete block completely overlooked this.
2 วันที่ผ่านมา
Actually, The localizer array was at the beginning of the runway, not the end. The pilot had missed the first landing and went into TOGA. Then he turned back and landed going the wrong way on the runway. One could still make the argument that the localizer array mounting platform shouldn't have been so monolithic and reinforced, but the fact is that it wasn't at the end of the runway technically speaking.
The localizer antennas are positioned at the far end of the runway which the landing was attempted. The fact of the matter is that the airplane landed, skidded the entire runway AND THEN hit the localizer antennas, ergo at the end of the runway in which the landing was attempted.
The fact that he felt he had to land the wrong way is very unusual even in a crash, and gives a sense of the panic or catastrophic failures they faced. I haven’t heard anything so far that’s so out of the ordinary that merits the abandonment of protocol.
@@Tamarlane389 You do know that this airport has runways 01 and 19, don't you? For whatever reason, the pilot elected to land on RWY 19. The localizer antennas are at the far side (end) of RWY 19 where he landed. I can''t even believe this discussion is still going on.
This was apparently their 2nd attempt at landing...very oddly there was 1 reverser deployed...it appears they were attempting a G/A but impacted the runway and could never get airborne again.
I had thought of the possibility of they lost both engines to bird strike as the most probable cause. While it is considered to be extremely unlikely a flock of birds crossing the path of a landing aircraft is not inconsiderable. The ATC expressly warned the pilots of the risk of bird before the tragedy unfolded. Because of it they simply had no time to deal with manually deploying the landing gears by gravity. I would imagine losing both engines also cause the loss of their inability to deploy the air brakes as there is no backup hydraulic.
Most major airports have a wall/earthen barrier at the end of a runway for exactly the reason we saw in the crash...that is to stop a careering aircraft from continuing on and causing even more damage and death.
why insist on a bird strike when it was clearly said by experts that it won't completely paralyzed a 737 from functioning can still do with one engine. that solid concrete wall at the end of the runway caused that fatal crash.
The scariest but probably most likely cause is that the crew (overwhelmed by checklists, overlapping aural warnings, sheer panic after the bird strike) just forgot to lower the gear - just as Mr. Tozer is saying here. Striking similarities with the flight he mentions (PIA 8303)
179 DEAD & NEVER SAID GOODBYE KOREA ?? You never said I’m leaving You never said goodbye. You were gone before I knew it And by plane crash I know why. In life I loved you completely In death I love you still. I hold a place in my heart That only you can fill. It broke my heart to lose you But I know you’re not alone. A part of me left with you As the seeds of death were sown. Tears are a love-mates humble gift When it's time to say goodbye Though the eyes are wet and swollen With time and patience they dry. By Tom Zart
Similar to the aircraft that landed short of the runway and crashed at San Francisco International Airport (SFO) was Asiana Airlines Flight 214. The incident occurred on July 6, 2013.
If they made the whole plane out of material like this the plane might survive but the people inside definitely won’t. The forces applied from the impact alone would be the end. Hence nothing really changing.
The airport is to blame for the deaths you do not have a wall just past the end of the runway. If not for that wall most and most likely all would of got off this plane OK.
Most major airports have a wall/earthen barrier at the end of a runway for exactly the reason we saw in the crash...that is to stop a careering aircraft from continuing on and causing even more damage and death.
I'm South Korean and no there was no politician or any leaders onboard. Turned out that most passengers were old retirees(and some of their families) who've been to Thailand for vacation.
The plane landed on the runway from the wrong direction, think - driving down a ‘no-entry’. This should be telling as far as panic is concerned as it’s very unusual, even in a crash. And it hit a mound where the radio antenna is located which planes fly over as they land. This structure sends navigation signals that help guide the planes to the runway.
What a ridiculous statement. A runway is not permanently a one way system. The direction in which an aircraft lands or takes off depends on wind direction. The runway at Muan Airport is labelled '01' and '19' at either end respectively.
What are you talking about… runways are designed to be used both ways, depending on the wind direction… there’s no such thing as a “no entry” in runways, except for a handful (not even) of them in the world, such as Lukla. But the only reason there is that the runway ends with a mountain
Can a few informants at Boeing please start talking about the mechanical and the quality control issues that this company has with its airplanes?..Oh wait, they end up dead!
Here are three point 1. Pilot might have done every needed and they land the plane perfectly... 2. Why plane back up not functioning as I assume those pilot have try all needed given the time they on this malfunction system when bird strick... 3. Runway should not have wall on both end period... Emergency you can't choose which direction you need to approach from...
Where to sit i.e. the safest place seems to depend on the type of accident you are unfortunate enough to be involved in. The back does seem to be statistically the best, although in the 1989 Sioux City crash you had the best chance in the middle; in the worst ever crash in Tenerife in 1977 only the front passengers survived.
But wait here. The problem was probably the 3-meter-high mound of earth located at the end of the runway. On Google Earth, it appears in the "street view" as a significant obstacle about 150 meters, or 491 ft, from the end of the runway.
"Between 2008 and 2017, the Australian Transport Safety Board recorded 16,626 bird strikes. In America, the Federal Aviation Administration reported 17,200 bird strikes in 2022 alone... Since 1988 250 aircraft have been destroyed by bird strikes." - SBS News
Weird that such sudden random unrests and havocs occur in South Korea since North Korean troops have been being 'sold' to Russia lead by former KGB agents. Especially after a plane came down with similar pictures in Russia and thus a more spectacular distraction was desperately needed..
Its a Boing that is why it crashed, So the Aviation commentator comments its going at high speed, seemingly with support of the engines, like there going full tilt, next second he says the engines may been knocked out and caused some system failure? now engines out or on?
Small birds, perfectly fine. Big birds, maybe engine failure, but even if it's dead and caught fire it's still fine, it can fly and land with one engine burning.
He is talking out of his bottom, just looked at the B737NG QRH and the talk as to why there's a possibility the gear wouldn't come down, even the landing gear manual release checklist covers the fact that it can get stuck. Why bring people who know nothing about piloting? if it was a bird, debris could puncture hydraulics this affecting the gear issue.
They can get stuck, but the fact is you can clearly see there was not even a partial deployment of the gear. So, from the video footage that implies they did not even try. Perhaps in the stress of the moment it was overlooked? We do not know for now.
@@chrishyde1216 What landing gear doors? google a photo of the 737 from underneath dn find me a gear door please except the nose gear with is a mechanic that can get stuck. read the QRH then talk.
I think that the crashes happen due to the fact that planes nowadays can be remotely controlled. If a malicious mind can remotely turn off a system or two and have the capability not to get his actions be recorded , then you can disguise a terrorist act as an accident. Imagine during landing pilots discover that a critical system is not working, they panic, then they see another system is not working. Of course, you panic - it is easy then to blame pilots everytime you want to down a plane. Remote controlling in case of planes and electric cars is a bad thing.
*"the fact that planes nowadays can be remotely controlled"* Whatever the conclusion followed, was based on a false premise. Passernger-faring airliners *_cannot_* be remotely controlled.
@@anarbekabdullin3574 There is absolutely NO COMMUNICATION POSSIBLE between an airliner''s flight control system and the outside world. Nothing. Zilch. Nada. You're watching too many air disaster movies.
Three important informations. 1.The plane belly landing at opposite direction of the real landing zone. 2. To change autopilot to manual needs 2 minutes. 3. Mayday from pilot 2 minutes before impact.
1. There are "real" (whatever that means) landing zones at both ends of the runway, usually the wind dictates the landing direction. 2. Changing from full auto to full manual flight takes all of a fraction of a second. Just press "AUTO PILOT DISENGAGE" button on the yoke. Presto, you're flying full manual. 3. Don't see how the time from mayday to impact is really relevant here
everyone saying the obstruction at the end of the runway was a criminal decision has no idea what is behind that, could be a school and an orphanage for all you know but suddenly everyone is an aviation and airport design expert
The wall is not the problem here , just now we know to little to be sure , but i belive he landed to far down the landing lane ...to stop ....the runway was 2.8 km long so the wall isnot the problem . Now go and luck up your self ....
Go look at the full unedited footage of the landing... It's damning. Plane explodes on impact with the wall. Had it not been there the passengers would have all walked away safety. No runoff area at all is CRIMINAL!!
Удалённое отключение систем. Также как и с электромобилями- производитель может удалённо отключать системы транспортного средства. И наверняка удалённое управление не записывается в чёрном ящике. Таким образом, теракты можно делать и представлять все как ошибку пилотов. А представьте во время посадки пилот обнаруживает, что критически важная система не работает, он в панике, делает, что может и хоп другая важная система отключается. Вот и все выглядит как ошибка пилотов. И поди докажи. В данном случае, им что-то отключили и они решили срочно сажать самолёт и тут пр посадке им отключили все возможности выпустить шасси, они сажают на брюхо и тут им отключают возможность реверса двигателя, и даже увеличивают скорость. Там у любого пилота будет паника, так как самолёт не просто неупрааляемый, а работает полтв пилотов. Так всегда можно пилотов дураками выставлять.
@@anarbekabdullin3574 Comrade, drones ARE MADE TO BE REMOTELY PILOTED. They are intentionally built with means of communication between their flight controls and the outside world. There is no such provision in passenger-faring airliners. Please educate yourself before talking in public about things of which you obviously have no understanding.
Terrible interview. Not sure who this interviewee is but no consideration of technical aspects etc. He just wanted to plug his book and stoke emotive sentiments.
Oh boy, here we go blaming the birds for everything from certain illnesses to aviation disasters. Poor birdies.
You're right. I like birds !
Or Boeing.
True
I have 2 pets birds
Huh?
Why is every report talking about the bird strike. The plane landed on its belly with wings level. The deaths were caused by the concrete wall at the end of the runway. Whoever ok'd that decision should be locked up.
Bingo.
It wasn't at the end of the runway. Concrete walls at the ends of runways don't exist, genius.
Because they are looking for a cause. The end result is the crash into a brick wall, but learning about the series of events that led up to that point is quite obviously crucial in helping to prevent what happened again in the future. The bird strike could have damaged the hydraulic systems responsible for the undercarriage. However, maybe the pilots in their panic did not check if the undercarriage had indeed lowered or not. There are so many factors, we will just have to wait for the investigation to conclude.
The concrete wall seems very much to have been a big factor, but that plane was coming down fast near the end of the runway, it would have been in trouble even without the wall.
@@prophetsnake oh thanks so much Mr. Right Stuff. Sorry for taking time away from your Top Gun tour.
Why has the media avoided reporting the same landing gear failure of a KLM plane crash in Norway a few hours after so korea crash...thankfully all passengers survived. KLMs landing gear hydraulics failed too...and not by a bird. It was a Boeing 737 too....
Interesting. Did KLM crew have to complete a manual gear drop? VASAviation has a photo of the KLM flight showing landing gear deployed.
Well, they didn’t avoid reporting it - simply, being with no injuries (not even a sprained ankle) it’s clearly less of a news. About the fact that these happened at a few hours difference is obviously purely by chance
There must’ve not been a concrete wall at the end of the runway in Norway.
I feel like the pilot was in a panic mode 🤷♂️
bad day for landing gear crashs within 24 hrs! so korea, KLM and canada..all crash landing due to landing gear failure! KLM lost hydraulic power and crash landed...all passengers survived..both planes are Boeing 737s..is there a connection?
Plane crash survivors at the most disastrous accident in aviation history in Japan in 1985, were also passengers at the rear seats.
I always get seats as far back as possible.
What caused the South Korea plane crash?
The giant concrete wall at the end of the runway.
yep....exactly.
Incorrect. That's what turned the accident into one with a very high death rate. It didn't cause the accident.
Nope ...
@@gzk6nkThey would of survived if the DMZ wall was not there.
DOLT
You survive that by being cabin crew sitting at the very back in backwards-facing crew seats fitted with full-harness seat belts.
Looks like pilot error to me
Can’t you see wall at the end of the runway Einstein?
Walls always been there. The speed it’s carrying is the problem
@@immigrationadviser4711the wall didn’t make the pilots fail lo lower the gear, slow down and land near the numbers.
@@epursimuove1633The walk is a dumb design of the airport though, ru ways have run offs for a reason.
Let's not forget that the localizer antennas were mounted on top of a massive concrete block just after the end of the runway, instead of being placed on the ground where they belonged. This concrete block gives absolutely no chance for airplanes should they for any reason experience a runway excursion on landing or aborted take-off. There is a thing called a "clearway" in airport design, and it is there for a reason. Whoever elected to mount the localizer antennas on top of a massive concrete block completely overlooked this.
Actually, The localizer array was at the beginning of the runway, not the end. The pilot had missed the first landing and went into TOGA. Then he turned back and landed going the wrong way on the runway. One could still make the argument that the localizer array mounting platform shouldn't have been so monolithic and reinforced, but the fact is that it wasn't at the end of the runway technically speaking.
The localizer antennas are positioned at the far end of the runway which the landing was attempted. The fact of the matter is that the airplane landed, skidded the entire runway AND THEN hit the localizer antennas, ergo at the end of the runway in which the landing was attempted.
It’s located at the start of runway, the plane landed the opposite side.
The fact that he felt he had to land the wrong way is very unusual even in a crash, and gives a sense of the panic or catastrophic failures they faced. I haven’t heard anything so far that’s so out of the ordinary that merits the abandonment of protocol.
@@Tamarlane389 You do know that this airport has runways 01 and 19, don't you? For whatever reason, the pilot elected to land on RWY 19. The localizer antennas are at the far side (end) of RWY 19 where he landed.
I can''t even believe this discussion is still going on.
Everyone would have survived if not for that concrete wall . There was no reason for it to be there
True, same thing happened before and everyone survived because there was no wall.
this is an expert?!!! Really? I would be more concerned why this plane was flying to fast trying to belly land
This was apparently their 2nd attempt at landing...very oddly there was 1 reverser deployed...it appears they were attempting a G/A but impacted the runway and could never get airborne again.
I had thought of the possibility of they lost both engines to bird strike as the most probable cause. While it is considered to be extremely unlikely a flock of birds crossing the path of a landing aircraft is not inconsiderable. The ATC expressly warned the pilots of the risk of bird before the tragedy unfolded.
Because of it they simply had no time to deal with manually deploying the landing gears by gravity. I would imagine losing both engines also cause the loss of their inability to deploy the air brakes as there is no backup hydraulic.
What maniac puts a solid wall at the end of a runway....
Smart koreans.
Most major airports have a wall/earthen barrier at the end of a runway for exactly the reason we saw in the crash...that is to stop a careering aircraft from continuing on and causing even more damage and death.
At the end of some runways you have towns, cities and oceans… no place should reach that distance
why insist on a bird strike when it was clearly said by experts that it won't completely paralyzed a 737 from functioning can still do with one engine. that solid concrete wall at the end of the runway caused that fatal crash.
LOL
Its the first hole in the swiss cheese model explanation of airliner crashes.
@@NewChannel-wi7vj hes right though, if you actually watched the video...
You are not EXPLAINING ALL the PREVIOUS reasons WHY THE PLANE GOT TO HIT THAT WALL... you 1D10+
@@robbedontuesday lol. not my job to explain the details since i am not an expert with plain crashes lol. i was just stating the obvious.
My wife is Korean. Now, we don’t know what happened, but it wouldn’t surprise me if hierarchy played some part.
The scariest but probably most likely cause is that the crew (overwhelmed by checklists, overlapping aural warnings, sheer panic after the bird strike) just forgot to lower the gear - just as Mr. Tozer is saying here. Striking similarities with the flight he mentions (PIA 8303)
And with 60 seconds to blow through the checklist. When you need 5 minutes, it's never just one item. It compounds so quickly and it's so devastating
Three comments, and they're all scam bots.
Sort it out.
Finally, someone address the elephant in the room. Likely pilot inexperience
I have seen the landing from different angles but I see no anti-collision lights on the airplane. Electrical problems?
Low-rez images in daytime. It's not really surprising that they don't show.
179 DEAD & NEVER SAID GOODBYE KOREA ??
You never said I’m leaving
You never said goodbye.
You were gone before I knew it
And by plane crash I know why.
In life I loved you completely
In death I love you still.
I hold a place in my heart
That only you can fill.
It broke my heart to lose you
But I know you’re not alone.
A part of me left with you
As the seeds of death were sown.
Tears are a love-mates humble gift
When it's time to say goodbye
Though the eyes are wet and swollen
With time and patience they dry.
By Tom Zart
Similar to the aircraft that landed short of the runway and crashed at San Francisco International Airport (SFO) was Asiana Airlines Flight 214. The incident occurred on July 6, 2013.
And it was a Boeing 777!
Why don't they make the whole Plane out of the Black Box material ?
If they made the whole plane out of material like this the plane might survive but the people inside definitely won’t. The forces applied from the impact alone would be the end. Hence nothing really changing.
Because it would be too heavy to fly?
Runway with Concrete Wall… what could go wrong…
Aliens removed the undercarriage and Trump built the wall
I'm surprised the mainstream media hasn't blamed Russia.
We need answers
Clearly the root cause was the bird strike, without that they would have simply landed on runway 01.
Must have been a rainbow bird.
A bird strike doesn't cause the landing gear to fail.
So what killed the passengers?? The landing or impact with the wall ??
Is that comedian Dom Jolly talking about a plane crash?
First decent commentary I heard
The airport is to blame for the deaths you do not have a wall just past the end of the runway. If not for that wall most and most likely all would of got off this plane OK.
Most major airports have a wall/earthen barrier at the end of a runway for exactly the reason we saw in the crash...that is to stop a careering aircraft from continuing on and causing even more damage and death.
250m..
How does one bring a plane down at that speed
They were Drone Birds.
Nice one... I don't see any "ACCIDENT" here...
Was there a prominent Korean leader/politician on the flight???
Yes... my humble opinion too... but leaders/politicians don't fly low-cost airlines, unfortunately.
@robbedontuesday ok.
I'm South Korean and no there was no politician or any leaders onboard. Turned out that most passengers were old retirees(and some of their families) who've been to Thailand for vacation.
@KHHVKimchicel my heart goes out to the families who lost their loved ones.
The plane landed on the runway from the wrong direction, think - driving down a ‘no-entry’. This should be telling as far as panic is concerned as it’s very unusual, even in a crash.
And it hit a mound where the radio antenna is located which planes fly over as they land. This structure sends navigation signals that help guide the planes to the runway.
What a ridiculous statement. A runway is not permanently a one way system. The direction in which an aircraft lands or takes off depends on wind direction. The runway at Muan Airport is labelled '01' and '19' at either end respectively.
What are you talking about… runways are designed to be used both ways, depending on the wind direction… there’s no such thing as a “no entry” in runways, except for a handful (not even) of them in the world, such as Lukla. But the only reason there is that the runway ends with a mountain
Tamar, your comment shows you know zero about airports.
@ even less than zero
@ what is less than zero in this situation?
Everyone I’ve heard are blaming other things other than Boeing itself, i.e - bird strike, concrete wall at end of runway ..
Can a few informants at Boeing please start talking about the mechanical and the quality control issues that this company has with its airplanes?..Oh wait, they end up dead!
Was this a downwind landing?
I am surprised that Russian had not blamed Ukrainian drones yet.
Or that someone hasn't blamed the CIA.
Let's investigate the pilot.
Here are three point
1. Pilot might have done every needed and they land the plane perfectly...
2. Why plane back up not functioning as I assume those pilot have try all needed given the time they on this malfunction system when bird strick...
3. Runway should not have wall on both end period... Emergency you can't choose which direction you need to approach from...
Where to sit i.e. the safest place seems to depend on the type of accident you are unfortunate enough to be involved in. The back does seem to be statistically the best, although in the 1989 Sioux City crash you had the best chance in the middle; in the worst ever crash in Tenerife in 1977 only the front passengers survived.
Speculation? It hit a wall!!!!! Talk about wheels and bird ??!!
But wait here. The problem was probably the 3-meter-high mound of earth located at the end of the runway. On Google Earth, it appears in the "street view" as a significant obstacle about 150 meters, or 491 ft, from the end of the runway.
Was Yoo B. Fok and Yu Tu Lo flying the aircraft ?
Why are they focused on a bird strike when a cement wall caused the damage?
Why are you focusing on a wall the plane should never have reached when the fault is clearly human/technical.
The expert is spot on.
Is it a bird or UFOS,? How can a mere bird interfere that much with such a huge plane? Anyway it's so sad beyond expression.
Maybe read a book on aviation and it will tell you how
"Between 2008 and 2017, the Australian Transport Safety Board recorded 16,626 bird strikes. In America, the Federal Aviation Administration reported 17,200 bird strikes in 2022 alone... Since 1988 250 aircraft have been destroyed by bird strikes." - SBS News
New generation of incompetence.
2 case , Hydraulic Landing Gear & barrier dead end (worst designated airport)
Weird that such sudden random unrests and havocs occur in South Korea since North Korean troops have been being 'sold' to Russia lead by former KGB agents.
Especially after a plane came down with similar pictures in Russia and thus a more spectacular distraction was desperately needed..
pilot error or sabotage?
Suicide by plane, terrorist misbehaving ?
, they were in tile section
Shelagh foggarrty was on board....
The wall !!!! Come on people.
Why can't they create a bird filter...Doesn't seem that difficult!!!
Its a Boing that is why it crashed, So the Aviation commentator comments its going at high speed, seemingly with support of the engines, like there going full tilt, next second he says the engines may been knocked out and caused some system failure? now engines out or on?
Boeing.....Boing is the sound kangaroos make when they hop.
it is a combination of human error and malfunctioning of the enginee.
Luck ? your number isn't up yet, no other explination neccessary !
Unfortunately, I have to agree with him 100% I think that’s what happened
3:50 the nonchalance with which he said "swallowing a bird or two" LOL
it's usually not a problem
Small birds, perfectly fine. Big birds, maybe engine failure, but even if it's dead and caught fire it's still fine, it can fly and land with one engine burning.
you are talking to a wrong expert lbc
Who will speak for the Birds ??
Blame it on the bird's .......🙄
Couldn't a bird strike cause the engine to come apart at high speed strewing parts all over the fuselage, damaging electrical or hydraulic systems?
Did you miss the part about gravity dropping the landing gear?
It’s a simple pulley mechanism if the hydraulics fail
we’ve had close calls with birds with small aircraft with Canada geese and it was frightening
Host is a fool. Where do i sit.
He is talking out of his bottom, just looked at the B737NG QRH and the talk as to why there's a possibility the gear wouldn't come down, even the landing gear manual release checklist covers the fact that it can get stuck. Why bring people who know nothing about piloting? if it was a bird, debris could puncture hydraulics this affecting the gear issue.
They can get stuck, but the fact is you can clearly see there was not even a partial deployment of the gear. So, from the video footage that implies they did not even try. Perhaps in the stress of the moment it was overlooked? We do not know for now.
@@ukmaxi Exactly. Furthermore, releasing the uplocks ("emergency down") would hardly result in 3 landing gear legs getting stuck at the same time.
Not even any of the landing gear doors opened. Surely, they weren't all stuck.
@@chrishyde1216 What landing gear doors? google a photo of the 737 from underneath dn find me a gear door please except the nose gear with is a mechanic that can get stuck. read the QRH then talk.
Massive death due to BIRD FLEW !
Miracle
Im blaming putin
"Tut tut".
"Do you remember The Birds Aren't Real?" - Qanon on drones
I think that the crashes happen due to the fact that planes nowadays can be remotely controlled. If a malicious mind can remotely turn off a system or two and have the capability not to get his actions be recorded , then you can disguise a terrorist act as an accident. Imagine during landing pilots discover that a critical system is not working, they panic, then they see another system is not working. Of course, you panic - it is easy then to blame pilots everytime you want to down a plane. Remote controlling in case of planes and electric cars is a bad thing.
😂
*"the fact that planes nowadays can be remotely controlled"*
Whatever the conclusion followed, was based on a false premise. Passernger-faring airliners *_cannot_* be remotely controlled.
You’re simple
Did you guys hear about drones and satellite communication?
@@anarbekabdullin3574 There is absolutely NO COMMUNICATION POSSIBLE between an airliner''s flight control system and the outside world. Nothing. Zilch. Nada. You're watching too many air disaster movies.
Three important informations. 1.The plane belly landing at opposite direction of the real landing zone. 2. To change autopilot to manual needs 2 minutes. 3. Mayday from pilot 2 minutes before impact.
1. There are "real" (whatever that means) landing zones at both ends of the runway, usually the wind dictates the landing direction.
2. Changing from full auto to full manual flight takes all of a fraction of a second. Just press "AUTO PILOT DISENGAGE" button on the yoke. Presto, you're flying full manual.
3. Don't see how the time from mayday to impact is really relevant here
If you buy your ticket for the correct airline you won’t have an accident in the first place….
Brave words
Jesus wept
Send the wall at the end of the runway to prison?
Why would anyone fly on a plane these days. It’s a profit before safety era.
everyone saying the obstruction at the end of the runway was a criminal decision has no idea what is behind that, could be a school and an orphanage for all you know but suddenly everyone is an aviation and airport design expert
Says the aviation expert?
@@RyanLeishman congratulations on being intentionally ignorant
@ thanks?
It was Russia!!! 🇷🇺 cause….Russia!!!
Panic
Cute soldier 74
As cabin crew they will need watching very carefully.
The guilt and I'm not suggesting they should feel any, will be awful.
He was never going to make it, guy thought he was Tom cruise.
Drone strike
The wall is not the problem here , just now we know to little to be sure , but i belive he landed to far down the landing lane ...to stop ....the runway was 2.8 km long so the wall isnot the problem . Now go and luck up your self ....
Go look at the full unedited footage of the landing... It's damning. Plane explodes on impact with the wall. Had it not been there the passengers would have all walked away safety. No runoff area at all is CRIMINAL!!
@ not true , if the wall was not there , the plane would have smashed through the outer wall surrounding the airport , and on to a freeway...
Удалённое отключение систем. Также как и с электромобилями- производитель может удалённо отключать системы транспортного средства. И наверняка удалённое управление не записывается в чёрном ящике. Таким образом, теракты можно делать и представлять все как ошибку пилотов. А представьте во время посадки пилот обнаруживает, что критически важная система не работает, он в панике, делает, что может и хоп другая важная система отключается. Вот и все выглядит как ошибка пилотов. И поди докажи. В данном случае, им что-то отключили и они решили срочно сажать самолёт и тут пр посадке им отключили все возможности выпустить шасси, они сажают на брюхо и тут им отключают возможность реверса двигателя, и даже увеличивают скорость. Там у любого пилота будет паника, так как самолёт не просто неупрааляемый, а работает полтв пилотов. Так всегда можно пилотов дураками выставлять.
Science fiction, comrade.
Do you believe that drones can be remotely controlled, comrade? )
@@anarbekabdullin3574 Comrade, drones ARE MADE TO BE REMOTELY PILOTED. They are intentionally built with means of communication between their flight controls and the outside world. There is no such provision in passenger-faring airliners. Please educate yourself before talking in public about things of which you obviously have no understanding.
@@coriscotupi are you sure? )
Don't blame the BIRDS !! Blame lies with the BIRDBRAINS operating the aircraft !!
Terrible interview. Not sure who this interviewee is but no consideration of technical aspects etc. He just wanted to plug his book and stoke emotive sentiments.
Apparently the pilot was planning a Korea break.
Pilot error plus airport error
Birds don’t make Boeing assassinate 2 whistleblowers during the year 2024. 🦜 🦆 🦩