Sarah Coakley is a brilliant theologian. As a constructive theologian myself I highly regard her work, "God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay on the Trinity."
What is meant here by "God"? Is the question QUID SIT DEUS assumed to be answered already by contemporary Anglican Christianity? In questioning her interlocutor's skepticism against our natural yearnings, the Reverend Professor Coakley seems to confuse Philosophy's God with Christianity's revealed God. Do we know of any medieval theologian who ever taught that natural reason has access to Christianity's personal God, as opposed to Aristotle's impersonal divinity?
This religion business probably will pass, in time as every thing does, so imagine it from 1.2 millions years time and ,,,,, well use your best imagination and see what you think.
Sarah Coakley is a brilliant theologian. As a constructive theologian myself I highly regard her work, "God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay on the Trinity."
Appreciate the upload.
FASCINATING
Thank you, Objective Bob
Very interesting
What is meant here by "God"? Is the question QUID SIT DEUS assumed to be answered already by contemporary Anglican Christianity?
In questioning her interlocutor's skepticism against our natural yearnings, the Reverend Professor Coakley seems to confuse Philosophy's God with Christianity's revealed God.
Do we know of any medieval theologian who ever taught that natural reason has access to Christianity's personal God, as opposed to Aristotle's impersonal divinity?
This religion business probably will pass, in time as every thing does, so imagine it from 1.2 millions years time and ,,,,, well use your best imagination and see what you think.
no religion, doesn't mean no God.
I agree. No' illustrated book about birds' does not mean no birds.