Sir i am from NIT you are teaching better than my professor who takes 2 lakhs salaray every month and he teach us nothing. You are teaching me for free. You have a good future . Love you sir.
Awesome sir, I couldn't understand what was expected while proving the error...But now I understood what was the logic behind it....Thank you so much sir..
because e is error which is already too small and squaring it will make it more small and so we can neglect it... We also expanded [ 1 + ((f''(alpha)/f'(alpha)) (en+1 + en) ] ^-1 using binomial expansion which resulted in squares of e which were also too small to consider so neglected.
Nice explanation sir thanks for help us, Respected sir please "Runge--kutta" method bhi karwa dijiay, then koi bhi aap kay iss vedio say pura NA padh legga 🙏🙏
There is difference b/w rate of convergence and order of convergence.... order of convergence of regula falsi method is 1 , whereas rate of convergence of regula falsi could be anything b/w 0 to 1 . The process u have explained in this vdo is for secant method not for regula falsi method. 1.618 is order of convergence of secant method .
@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS I am sorry to say that you are wrong again... Both the methods have the same formula and that might be the reason of your error. You might not have noticed that one of the method viz. the Regula Falsi method is a bracketing method and the other one is not. As a result of bracketing the root, Regula Falsi has linear rate of convergence. I recommend you to study the topic thoroughly and see your mistake. Thanks Abhijit
Sir may nay check kia hai. Regula Falsi method linearly covergent hai. Aik research paper hai aap zar iss ko check krein. compmath-journal.org/dnload/Robin-Kumar-and-Vipan-/CMJV06I06P0290.pdf
This video should be deleted...you are teaching wrong...this is for secant method...before putting any video you should be checking it a number of times...if I would not have checked it on Google ...my marks would have surely gone....do not play with our exams okay...if you want to help then help with your heart. Not merely by putting video without even seeing whether your material is correct or not
i have three book .in all book given rate of convergence of regula falsi method 1.618 .another inform you that rate of convergence of regula falsi method and secant method are same..i request you check againg
Actually the relation that has been obtained at 20:26 upto that everything is correct...but after that whatever has been done to obtain the result belongs to secant method
but in my book given result 1.618 I have H K DASS BOOK ENGINEERING MATHS.AND HAVE ANOTHER TWO BOOK GIVEN SAME RESULT. BUT I WILL CHECK AGAIN MORE BOOK.. THEN DECIDE .... MY AIM NOT GIVEN WRONG INFORMATION. MY AIM GIVEN CORRECT INFORMATION.
I confirmed from numerical methods by srk iyengar ,R.K jain on page number 19 And another book whose name I don't know...and a local book too... On Google also...there are some PDFs available that show the same that it has linear order or convergence.... It's specially mentioned that among the three methods ,regula falsi has linear,secant has 1.6 and Newton raphson has quadratic rate of convergence My aim is just to save some other student's time which I wasted in clearing this thing out.
Sir i am from NIT you are teaching better than my professor who takes 2 lakhs salaray every month and he teach us nothing. You are teaching me for free. You have a good future . Love you sir.
Ap kis nit se ho plz reply kariyega qki this year mai bhi nit mai admission lene ja rhi..
@@priyasrivastava7534tamil? congrats for that the professor was changed.
@@Official-tk3nc can u give me idea about nit calicut for mathematics?
@@priyasrivastava7534 yeah great go for it.
@@Official-tk3nc thanku
Awesome sir, I couldn't understand what was expected while proving the error...But now I understood what was the logic behind it....Thank you so much sir..
thanks your feedback
Sir your are such a great teacher, nice explanation
Thank you it's was so good...❤but is secent method bit i am ok because i also went secent method so it's good for me ❤
Very good!
Your voice is nice...and very pretty explanation..
Rate of convergencr of regula falsi meathod as well as secant meathod is same if anyone is confused
Thnx captain Levi's
Supper 👌 sir thank you for crystal clear 🙏
Nice explanation Sir ...Thank u alot ..everything is coming to understand
Can you make a video on stability finding of Newton and Halley method
i will try as soon as possible
THIS IS RATE OF CONVERGENCE FOR SECANT METHOD 😶🥴😑
THANks a lot👏
Nice explanation sir , but in book(RK Jain) given that RF method has linear rate of convergence it's means 1
ok
Sir 19:50 py kesy kiya apny wo to 1+f"(@)/f'(@) wlaa tha na neechy wala minus main kesy hua??
i will see
most welcome
thanks your feedback
binomial expansion of (1+x)^-1
Sir app rate of convergence of secant method ka vdo banaliye plz sir
Will try
Excellent explanation sir
Thanks and welcome
This is not the convergence analysis of the regula falsi method. This is for the Secant method.
ok
Sir very inspiring method...
sir why have you not negleted the terms of power e^2n in taylor series while solving .......
because e is error which is already too small and squaring it will make it more small and so we can neglect it... We also expanded [ 1 + ((f''(alpha)/f'(alpha)) (en+1 + en) ] ^-1 using binomial expansion which resulted in squares of e which were also too small to consider so neglected.
Nice 👍🙂🙂
Thanks for the visit
This is convergence of secant method plz check it sir
Very very good😊
very long but now unforgettable
very nice explain kiya sir
Thanks and welcome
Very nice sir 😍🤗🙏
Keep watching
thanks your feedback
Nice explanation sir.
Thanks sir, u explain very nice
thanks your feedback
Well explained
Thanku sir
Thanks Sir for easy tutorial
Thank you sooo much sirrrrr
Most welcome
Regula falsi keh k secant method ki convergence kra di😵💫
Guys regula falsi method's convergence is 1 and 1.618 is the convergence of secant method.
sir is regular false method always converges?
Kya h sir aapke wajah se AVI glat ho jata mera paper regula falsi ka linear convergence hota h ye AAP jo btay h wo secant method ka h
aap phir se check karo..
mai bhi ek bar check karata hu.
thanks to inform me .
@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS sir B.s Grewal k page no.920 me dekhe example 28.3 k just above k lines ko
rate of convergence of regula falsi method and secant method are same ..
@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS You are wrong they both don't have same rate of conv.
Regular falsi method ka rate of convergence 1 ni hota kya?? Please explain sir
nahi
Thank you sir
Rate of convergence of regula falsi is 1.
1.618 is the rate of convergence of secant method
ok
i will check again .
thanks your information ..
Yes you are right
rate of convergence of secant method and regula falsi method are same . i request you check again..
@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS regular falsi is 1
Book Reference is
Jain and Iyengar
What's the name of your Android App sir ?
Nice explanation sir thanks for help us, Respected sir please "Runge--kutta" method bhi karwa dijiay, then koi bhi aap kay iss vedio say pura NA padh legga 🙏🙏
sorry sir but this is for the secant method
not the regula falsi method... i've checked multiple times
is't this the rate of convergence of secant method?
ok.
i will find my mistake.
Sir secent method ka rate of convergence ka proof v kya same hoga???
same as regula falsi method..
@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS No its not.
if it comes in 2 number to direct formula likh de???
Thanks
most welcome
thanks your feedback
Nice sir
thanks your feedback
please support my channek
xn ❌
action ✅
Super
thanks your feedback
please support my channek
Rate of convergence of false position method is 1
There is difference b/w rate of convergence and order of convergence....
order of convergence of regula falsi method is 1 ,
whereas rate of convergence of regula falsi could be anything
b/w 0 to 1 .
The process u have explained in this vdo is for secant method not for regula falsi method.
1.618 is order of convergence of secant method .
Are you sure about this???
@@funnyvideo8983 yeah
That is applicable for secant method😒😒
👍👍🏆🎉
Secant method
It is for secant method or regular falsi method 😂
Regula falsi has 1 secant method has 1.618
ok
With all due respect you should realize your mistake (if rate of convergence of Regula Falsi is 1.6 ) please provide the source.
It's wrong. Regula-Falsi method is linearly convergent. Please rectify the result.
ok
i will check..
rate of convergence of ragula falsi method and secant method are same..
ans correct hai ..
i rquest you check again
@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS I am sorry to say that you are wrong again... Both the methods have the same formula and that might be the reason of your error. You might not have noticed that one of the method viz. the Regula Falsi method is a bracketing method and the other one is not. As a result of bracketing the root, Regula Falsi has linear rate of convergence. I recommend you to study the topic thoroughly and see your mistake.
Thanks
Abhijit
Why the volume is so low, almost inaudible?
v long or messive😅
Kuch jada work out ho gya
yah proof hai time to lagega hi.
Sir I am sorry to say that your result is wrong. Regula Falsi method is linearly convergent. Its order of convergence is 1.
aap again check kar lo
Sir may nay check kia hai. Regula Falsi method linearly covergent hai. Aik research paper hai aap zar iss ko check krein.
compmath-journal.org/dnload/Robin-Kumar-and-Vipan-/CMJV06I06P0290.pdf
@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS reply me plz 2 no m aaya to kitna karna hai
This video should be deleted...you are teaching wrong...this is for secant method...before putting any video you should be checking it a number of times...if I would not have checked it on Google ...my marks would have surely gone....do not play with our exams okay...if you want to help then help with your heart. Not merely by putting video without even seeing whether your material is correct or not
thanks to inform me i will check and correct
i have three book .in all book given rate of convergence of regula falsi method 1.618
.another inform you that rate of convergence of regula falsi method and secant method are same..i request
you check againg
Actually the relation that has been obtained at 20:26 upto that everything is correct...but after that whatever has been done to obtain the result belongs to secant method
but in my book given result 1.618
I have H K DASS BOOK ENGINEERING MATHS.AND HAVE ANOTHER TWO BOOK GIVEN SAME RESULT.
BUT I WILL CHECK AGAIN MORE BOOK..
THEN DECIDE ....
MY AIM NOT GIVEN WRONG INFORMATION.
MY AIM GIVEN CORRECT INFORMATION.
I confirmed from numerical methods by srk iyengar ,R.K jain on page number 19
And another book whose name I don't know...and a local book too...
On Google also...there are some PDFs available that show the same that it has linear order or convergence....
It's specially mentioned that among the three methods ,regula falsi has linear,secant has 1.6 and Newton raphson has quadratic rate of convergence
My aim is just to save some other student's time which I wasted in clearing this thing out.