Sudoku Adventure

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @Izual_Rebirth
    @Izual_Rebirth 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Brilliant. I was intimidated when I first read the ruleset but once I started think about it everything flowed really nicely. Another great puzzle by Wuschel.

  • @davidrattner9
    @davidrattner9 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Incredible from you Wuschel!! Great use of renbans with doublers!! Your explanations and solving Rangsk were magnificent!

  • @emphyriohazzl1510
    @emphyriohazzl1510 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    5:23 for me. Quite tough for an advent-ure but very fun with somewhat unusual and refreshing logic :). For the start I differed a bit : in row 1 since r1c123 are from 1-2-3-5, 4 and 6 must go on the renban in r1c456 and they have to go with a 5 with no doublers.
    And later on for c3, I noticed that 6 couldn't be in r3c3 : classic renban trick, it would force 45 in r2c12 and 6 in r2c3, too many 6 c3. Then I noticed that 1 and 2 could only go in r1c3 in the first three top cells of c3, so the renban in the bottom contains the other 1 or 2. Therefore it doesn't contain a 6 (2 being doubled already). That places 6 in r2c3 in the column, which forces the 3 doubler in r3c3.

  • @Wuschel_7881
    @Wuschel_7881 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yay, great solve! Doubler week was hard to set but super fun.
    How I saw that tough spot while setting:
    Row 3 column 3 sees the 456 triple in box 1 (via renban and column).
    So it has to be 3 (doubled or natural), placing a 45 pair on the renban in box 1 and leaving a lonely 6 in row 2 column 3.
    After that the column 3 logic gets way easier (with a 5 on the vertical renban it can't also contain the 1 which goes in r1c3).

  • @PaulHester66
    @PaulHester66 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I knew a doubler on a renban had to be 1, 2 or 3 and I knew I'd used 1, 2 and 3 as doubler but never connected the two. Had to peek at the video to remove the possible doublers on the 3 square renban in bottom right. Great puzzle.

  • @tiffanyriker9855
    @tiffanyriker9855 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice! It's cool that one of the givens ended up being doubled.

  • @andyleighton3616
    @andyleighton3616 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow - exactly 10 mins for me. Quite a while but I managed to work it all out in the end. I obviously need to have more practice at doubler puzzlers though, especially when combined with other constraints.

  • @psiphiorg
    @psiphiorg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My time for this puzzle was 7:14, solver number 158.