Doctor, your channel is highly valuable for people outside medical industry, also very under followed. Please continue with the great work you have been doing. Thank you!
I live in the UK and regularly download the Public Heath England Vaccine Surveillance report as well as other reports to analyse by age group the number of people who are vaccinated or not together with the mortality rate of each age group as well as against whether each covid related death related to a person who was fully vaccinated or not. Even in the most at risk age groups, the survival rate is very high whether someone infected with covid was vaccinated or not. I did see a very small benefit for vaccinated people vs unvaccinated people but, in the context of a very high survivability rate, it's was not statistically significant. Therefore, as any vaccine efficacy can be seen to decline over time, at this point in time, there is no real benefit for people to be vaccinated even in the most at risk groups. For the same reasons, being ordered to get boosters shots is the medical equivalent of beating a dead horse and maybe even much worse than that. Then, as we factor in the quite high rate of adverse effects and mortality caused by the vaccines, it's really difficult from an objective point-of-view to justify a mass vaccination policy along with all the societal level damage being caused by vaccine mandates and covid passports. On top of this, we have the unknown long-term health impacts of vaccines and warnings from experts, such as Geert Vanden Bossche & Robert Malone, that mass vaccination of healthy people will drive new variants - ie. counter-productive as was stated in the video. All in all, we could well be looking at a health crisis or even catastrophe ahead of us, caused by mass vaccine rollouts.
Wow, phenomenally detailed clear and scientific explanations. Really amazing the amount of work that has gone into producing this video. Thanks for your contributions.
Good info but I have a couple of questions: 1. Why is it clinically okay for the CDC and FDA to recommend Remdesivir or EUA approve Molnupirivir with as little proof of efficacy as there is for HCQ or Ivermectin? I hear of no one claiming Remdesivir saved their life but I do have three friends that will swear that Ivermectin did. Old friend was fully vaccinated, at the 5 month mark to the day and caught CV19. Four days later he was going to check into the hospital and his doctor suggested he get the monoclonal antibodies and avoid the trap of the hospital. Two days and two treatments and he is a new person. My brother works in a hospital with about a 60% death rate for patients that come to the hospital. His hospital finally started using monoclonal antibodies four weeks ago and now have a better than 70% recovery rate. He is completely amazed. Right now he is very frustrated that the treatment was held back for so long when clear numbers were available to push this treatment to the top of the list. All he sees is hte death they could have avoided if the scientific truth was just followed. In the end all information about Remdesivir and Molnupirivir are just as week as HCQ or Ivermectin but Big Pharma are behind treatment for $2000 per pill and not behind $2 a pill so every possible bull horn of society keeps screaming "horse dewormer" and Pharmacists refuse to allow perscri[ptions that could provide data at lease as good as the VAERS data that is used to approve the big pharma requests for their drugs!!!
This channel has an extraordinary and superb level of depth, accuracy and comprehensiveness of presented information. But I'm 100x more interested in radiation physics and its medical imaging modalities than in biology and so am subscribing now in hope you will soon return to what appears to be that original focus of the channel.
Thank you from Germany (Eifel) Very helpful!! I got a deeper understanding by this excellent presentation. I will share this video with others. God bless 🙏
Excellent channel and extremely informative However I was wondering if the amount of vaccine that used the single spike protein would causes all the damage and perhaps it’s mostly the broken off bits from the immune response or maybe the mRNA just keeps pumping them out of the infected cells at rates that are to high although it’s probably both may be
From your question, I think you understand this but just to emphasize, the vaccine does not contain any of the spike protein itself- just the mRNA strand that encodes for the spike. Based on our understanding of genetic translation and transcription, there should be no way for the mRNA vaccines to keep pumping out the spike proteins. Once the volume of mRNA is translated into proteins, production should stop. The only scenario where that may not be the case is if you have an existing SARS-CoV2 infection that has already produced a RDRNA polymerase in the cytoplasm of your cells that would allow your body to produce negative and positive sense RNA strands of the manmade genetic code. On the other hand, the DNA vaccines I personally have no idea how the body stops reproducing the spike with those products as I can't figure out if the genetic code forms a plasmid in the nucleus of our cells or is somehow incorporated into our own gene sequence. Regardless of the type of genetic vaccine type, the clinical response from each individual may be determined by multiple factors including baseline health, the integrity of the immune system and possibly the route of administration (intramuscular versus inadvertent direct venous or arterial injection) which may determine the ultimate distribution of the spike proteins in the body.
Dr. Klioze, since your last video I graduated high school, then I applied to medical school and was accepted :)
Congrats 👏👏🎉
congrats!
Doctor, your channel is highly valuable for people outside medical industry, also very under followed.
Please continue with the great work you have been doing. Thank you!
I live in the UK and regularly download the Public Heath England Vaccine Surveillance report as well as other reports to analyse by age group the number of people who are vaccinated or not together with the mortality rate of each age group as well as against whether each covid related death related to a person who was fully vaccinated or not. Even in the most at risk age groups, the survival rate is very high whether someone infected with covid was vaccinated or not. I did see a very small benefit for vaccinated people vs unvaccinated people but, in the context of a very high survivability rate, it's was not statistically significant. Therefore, as any vaccine efficacy can be seen to decline over time, at this point in time, there is no real benefit for people to be vaccinated even in the most at risk groups. For the same reasons, being ordered to get boosters shots is the medical equivalent of beating a dead horse and maybe even much worse than that.
Then, as we factor in the quite high rate of adverse effects and mortality caused by the vaccines, it's really difficult from an objective point-of-view to justify a mass vaccination policy along with all the societal level damage being caused by vaccine mandates and covid passports. On top of this, we have the unknown long-term health impacts of vaccines and warnings from experts, such as Geert Vanden Bossche & Robert Malone, that mass vaccination of healthy people will drive new variants - ie. counter-productive as was stated in the video. All in all, we could well be looking at a health crisis or even catastrophe ahead of us, caused by mass vaccine rollouts.
Wow, phenomenally detailed clear and scientific explanations. Really amazing the amount of work that has gone into producing this video. Thanks for your contributions.
Good info but I have a couple of questions: 1. Why is it clinically okay for the CDC and FDA to recommend Remdesivir or EUA approve Molnupirivir with as little proof of efficacy as there is for HCQ or Ivermectin? I hear of no one claiming Remdesivir saved their life but I do have three friends that will swear that Ivermectin did. Old friend was fully vaccinated, at the 5 month mark to the day and caught CV19. Four days later he was going to check into the hospital and his doctor suggested he get the monoclonal antibodies and avoid the trap of the hospital. Two days and two treatments and he is a new person. My brother works in a hospital with about a 60% death rate for patients that come to the hospital. His hospital finally started using monoclonal antibodies four weeks ago and now have a better than 70% recovery rate. He is completely amazed. Right now he is very frustrated that the treatment was held back for so long when clear numbers were available to push this treatment to the top of the list. All he sees is hte death they could have avoided if the scientific truth was just followed. In the end all information about Remdesivir and Molnupirivir are just as week as HCQ or Ivermectin but Big Pharma are behind treatment for $2000 per pill and not behind $2 a pill so every possible bull horn of society keeps screaming "horse dewormer" and Pharmacists refuse to allow perscri[ptions that could provide data at lease as good as the VAERS data that is used to approve the big pharma requests for their drugs!!!
This channel has an extraordinary and superb level of depth, accuracy and comprehensiveness of presented information. But I'm 100x more interested in radiation physics and its medical imaging modalities than in biology and so am subscribing now in hope you will soon return to what appears to be that original focus of the channel.
@Doctor Klioze, please could you represent the Neuropilin NPI-1 ?
Thank you from Germany (Eifel)
Very helpful!! I got a deeper understanding by this excellent presentation. I will share this video with others. God bless 🙏
31:11 what about reducing the amount of potential hosts so that the obese and immunocompromised are less likely to be infected?
Excellent channel and extremely informative
However I was wondering if the amount of vaccine that used the single spike protein would causes all the damage and perhaps it’s mostly the broken off bits from the immune response or maybe the mRNA just keeps pumping them out of the infected cells at rates that are to high although it’s probably both may be
From your question, I think you understand this but just to emphasize, the vaccine does not contain any of the spike protein itself- just the mRNA strand that encodes for the spike. Based on our understanding of genetic translation and transcription, there should be no way for the mRNA vaccines to keep pumping out the spike proteins. Once the volume of mRNA is translated into proteins, production should stop. The only scenario where that may not be the case is if you have an existing SARS-CoV2 infection that has already produced a RDRNA polymerase in the cytoplasm of your cells that would allow your body to produce negative and positive sense RNA strands of the manmade genetic code. On the other hand, the DNA vaccines I personally have no idea how the body stops reproducing the spike with those products as I can't figure out if the genetic code forms a plasmid in the nucleus of our cells or is somehow incorporated into our own gene sequence.
Regardless of the type of genetic vaccine type, the clinical response from each individual may be determined by multiple factors including baseline health, the integrity of the immune system and possibly the route of administration (intramuscular versus inadvertent direct venous or arterial injection) which may determine the ultimate distribution of the spike proteins in the body.
Yeah but where did coronavirus come from?
Honesty.....your a breath of fresh air.
Excellent explanation and analysis. Thank you
This is such a good video I really hope more people watch it.
Excellent 👍 thanks 🏴😎
This was fantastic, thank you!
Are they focusing in quantity not quality?
Merci 👍Ptg en France 🇫🇷
Nice review - thank you