Judge, I've met ppl in Walmart and they have told me their whole lifes story. Some ppl just need to vent. I always greet ppl with a smile and say have a blessed day. To some ppl those small gestures mean alot. I don't mind listening.
@@_MoneyMike_ Social media too...I contacted a guy on FB for lawncare services and in the midst of us setting up an appointment to come out and quote my yard he went into detail about his personal life for whatever reason....There's nothing new under the sun.
There is nothing a stranger off the street can tell me about my ex that’s gonna keep me from letting him see his children. they had some other shit already going on.
His ex-wife and YOU. Two completely different people. I am not understanding the conversations about them and their relationship. The other stuff already going on was THEIR DIVORCE. Again, nothing to do with case.
Judge had every Intention of making the defendant seem incompetent. Then when he made himself look stupid he tried to play it off like he was trying to learn something new. Good job defendant on keeping your cool and setting the record straight you know mechanics and Judge need to stick to law with his assumptions.
He tried his hardest to simp and pander, "Don't try to save your reputation now" "Don't talk over me" and tried making it seem like he knew about the subject 😂 But when the defendant explained what was going on JM backtracked hard AF! JM tried to clown him about working in the rain but the defendant straightened him out. Great job!
I agree with the ruling. Why are you calling his ex wife? How did you even get her #? Expensive lesson to learn to just come to court like you did minus doing the absolute most before getting there.
Even if her contacting the ex was wrong, there was still absolutely no evidence that was what caused him not to see his children lol. As she said, when she called the ex, it sounded like the ex already had ongoing problems with him. Even if JM was gonna rule in his favour, from jumping from $500 to $5000 for a case with no evidence seems ludicrous. Seems very inconsistent with some of his other rulings.
@@Ayana08SuperStar I agree - but my point was about evidence of the effect it had vs the verdict. In other cases, JM has dismissed those types of claims. A car issue with a random woman is not what stopped him from seeing his kids lol
@@blackestknightx8881he blocked her number and she can’t get to her cancer treatments. In the meantime he staying up all night and sleeping all day for days at a time. She can’t call his ex to ask how to get ahold of him? That’s not gossip. She’s trying to get in touch with his trifling behind. I bet his ex wife can tell you why he isn’t seeing his kids and it ain’t got nothing to do with this lady and her car!
That's where those people fuck up at. Blabbing about their life stories. Somethings aren't meant for you to tell any and everyone. What if their business gets put out on blast and that was not their intention to be exposed to that extent. Then that's their own fault. Shouldn't be that much of a blabbermouth
Some people are really not well…. Calling a ex over this mess and you could’ve went somewhere else. You really need to be careful of who you hook up with… SMH
Plaintiff was messy but the punishment doesn't fix the crime. The wife shouldn't keep the kids away if he is of no danger to the kids. The judge doesn't know everything about him and ex wife. What if he was abusive or owed child support? 500 dollars was enough to award her for gossip.
I agree with the ruling but the judge is wrong when he says nobody gets that emotional over a car because I definitely have and I definitely will not saying my actions would have been the same as hers
the ruling was on point....but something just dont seem to add up concerning her story of them just being friends.....and judge mathis checked her as soon as she tried to shove that BS . they just friends but she getting his ex wife involved in they simple business deal....
She tried to put her kids in it thinking JM was gone feel for her but the whole time her kids are grown men. She tried to use them to intimidate the defendant but his kids are actual children. JM tried to catch him up but he made his testimony make sense enough to give him credit. Then what she did by calling his Ex was a no no nopity nope nope.
Nope! Bad judgement! She’s dealing with cancer and couldn’t get to her appointment! She didn’t badmouth him to the ex, just explained why she reached out! Ex even indicated she didn’t talk to him and appeared he already didn’t see his child! Not a good judgement At ALL!
He tried his hardest to simp and pander, "Don't try to save your reputation now" "Don't talk over me" and tried making it seem like he knew about the subject 😂 But when the defendant explained what was going on JM backtracked hard AF! JM tried to clown him about working in the rain but the defendant straightened him out. Great job!
In the beginning she accused him of being a recovered addict & said things like he slept all day & was up at night that may indicate to one he relapsed. I'm sure the judge had that in mind when he thought about what was mentioned on the call.
He got $5000 for her calling his ex? That’s a lil excessive….he was ignoring her calls and trying to reach him. I’m sure she didn’t mean any harm by calling her to contact him. Especially since they both said it was only a friendship.
@_MoneyMike_ the point is he should've been professional...it's not his place to expose her...what if she went home &nd got beat up anything cus "the Judge" said they're messing around...some ppl are easily influenced with nonsense...
Im appauled. LUDRICROUS RULING.🤯....it aint easy walking..id want the luxury of a car too.... but bcos man child has cancer ..i get it empathize🙏🏼.. but NOT $5k.
Wow! I think JM ruling was very harsh. The defendant was shady, point blank period! Yes you get what you pay for however the defendant not being reachable and asking for pieces one by was totally unacceptable. He had ample time to get things done and waited last minute. I do believe the plaintiff truly contacted the ex to try and reach him regarding her car and the conversation turned into her bad mouthing .obviously him and the ex had existing issues but I felt the defendant milked that to his advantage. Who stops someone from seeing their kids over a car😒Judge Mathis is PMS’n again!
This was the most ridiculous azz ruling in all of his court cases. Judge Mathis doesn't need a new court show. This was agregious! The man asked for $500 because his ex wife doesn't like him and gets $5k! This is flat out stupid. The lady has health issues and needed her damn car!
Love that you asked who would stop having someone from seeing their children because of a car when we see cases where females would stop having their kids see their father just because they are dating somebody else or because they just want more money or they broke up with one another so the car is not far fetched
For the ones that said karma gonna bite JM for his ruling for this case seems like KARMA done bit YOU today Because it didn't go your way 🤣 Shout Out To The wanna be always Rights 🤬🤐😯
@@_MoneyMike_How can you say its true with the rest of the world. Do you know the entire World and that there aren't other females who are also held accountable. You are completely off with that comment. There are other females who get the karma they deserve as they should get
Whoa....wait....what just happened here? I've seen people get a lot less than $5,000 after someone posted nude photos of them online. She shouldn't have called his ex-wife but where is his proof he can't see his children over 1 phone call about a business deal gone wrong. If he has a custody agreement withholding his children wouldn't even be legal. She has cancer & needed her car. She should've just taken it to a reputable mechanic. That would've been less than the $5k judgment.
It didn't make since 😂if you scan it it tells you to replace what number spark plug and coil packs you don't have to take apart to know that im not a mechanic but fix stuff
I almost hate to wstch this based on the comments 😲JM you getting in trouble with the Family big time..let me go head and watch cause the Family is rarely wrong.😂 Edit: 5k!! This has to be a joke Judge Mathis? Absolutely Wrong Judgment.
This is why I hardly even click on his stuff anymore and keep scrolling. To be an attorney and a judge he is totally unprofessional, uncouth, immature and just bad natured. He behaves as a bully with a robe and it makes no sense to me how he’s still on the bench. Everything isn’t a joke nor funny. God bless his wife. I know she is sick of his mess. However, I think he hit the nail on the head with them being romantically involved because no one does that over a car to that extent of contacting an ex. How’sMs she even know who she was?
He got it right. What was she doing calling his ex wife bad mouthing about some business that has nothing to do with her? Knowing they already had a rocky relationship. That's messy and it created mess for he and his children
I agree. He had this lady’s car, blocked her number and she couldn’t even get to her cancer appointments. She called his ex to get in touch with him. So what. His ex already hated him when she called. Come on, she’s not the reason he can’t see his kids. That dude was not the victim and now she has to pay him $5,000.😡
@morob466 Again, she should've sued like she's doing now. Or she could've called any of his other friends or family. She was intentially trying to be messy and the judge saw that. She knew him and his ex wife had issues and specifically dealing with the kids because, as she stated, they were good friends. The ruling was appropriate. Can't go around messing with people's personal lives over business
I paid a shade tree mechanic $800 , all I got was a CAR WASH..I filed in small claims court, he didn't appear..I won the case, but he didn't have any assets or anything of value in his name..🤑🤑🤑 I was granted a FI FA..Tuition in the school of life from the streets...
Judge, I've met ppl in Walmart and they have told me their whole lifes story. Some ppl just need to vent. I always greet ppl with a smile and say have a blessed day. To some ppl those small gestures mean alot. I don't mind listening.
Exactly!
Not over Facebook tho…
@@_MoneyMike_ Social media too...I contacted a guy on FB for lawncare services and in the midst of us setting up an appointment to come out and quote my yard he went into detail about his personal life for whatever reason....There's nothing new under the sun.
Yea Greg be tripping sometimes that attitude sometimes is just not needed from him.
@@_MoneyMike_ lol yeah maybe not over Facebook but then again you never know. Lol
The lady sitting behind the plaintiff.. awesome transformation ❤️
Yep
What happened
@@queenmonea4966she lose 20 pounds
@@queenmonea4966She lost weight.
She look and feels good❤❤❤!
There is nothing a stranger off the street can tell me about my ex that’s gonna keep me from letting him see his children. they had some other shit already going on.
His ex-wife and YOU. Two completely different people. I am not understanding the conversations about them and their relationship. The other stuff already going on was THEIR DIVORCE. Again, nothing to do with case.
If she stopped letting him see his kids based over her calling, they already had bigger problems.
Boom!!
with that being certainly true she still had no business doing that hence the ruling was absolutely correct
@@anudesignsbynkrumah9081 agreed
But that is NOT the issue here.
I don't think the call pushed the ex-wifes decision to not let him see the kids, it sounds like the call, however agitated an already bad situation.
She walked in suing him for 1,500.
Walked out owing him 5,000.
😅😅😅😅😅
Judge had every Intention of making the defendant seem incompetent. Then when he made himself look stupid he tried to play it off like he was trying to learn something new. Good job defendant on keeping your cool and setting the record straight you know mechanics and Judge need to stick to law with his assumptions.
He tried his hardest to simp and pander, "Don't try to save your reputation now" "Don't talk over me" and tried making it seem like he knew about the subject 😂 But when the defendant explained what was going on JM backtracked hard AF! JM tried to clown him about working in the rain but the defendant straightened him out. Great job!
@@EnemyMarcus exactly 😁
Mathis was mad she didn't kiss his behind and laugh at all his dry jokes. He'll hold on to a grudge till it's time to rule
😂😂😂 #facts
😂😂😂 #facts
She called that man's wife that is harassment
Nah she was outta pocket calling his ex wife
I think it was the right ruling, but I think you c😅be right also
Nice call, Judge. 🎉
I agree with the ruling. Why are you calling his ex wife? How did you even get her #? Expensive lesson to learn to just come to court like you did minus doing the absolute most before getting there.
Why the ex wife doesn't let him see the kids for some petty reason? A bum who doesn't payed child support or something like that
She shouldn't have called the ex-wife.
That necklace she has on is BAD!!!
Now she gotta pawn it so she can pay him his 5k lol
What in the world. $5,000 that's crazy. He had no proof. And the ex wife said she already wasn't talking to him. Bogus ruling
The proof was she said she called her. 🤷🏽♀️🤷🏽♀️
Should’ve just took him to court and not called his ex wife!
Bullshiiiii, there are definitely deeper routed issues as to why he's not seeing his kids... really $5000 JM 😂
Hahahah! The way she walked away was HILARIOUS!
Oh wow won’t expecting that ending
Shouldn't be calling his ex-wife for anything that has nothing to do with her. Come on lady.
I knew she lost as soon as she admitted to calling his ex. Judge don't play that with kids or people jobs
The ruling was simple. The messy lady went too far. So Judge gave the maximum ruling.
Judge Mathis Tore her head completely off.
Good lol
SHE GOT PAID UNDER THE TABLE
As he should
She talked her way into paying 5k 😂
Even if her contacting the ex was wrong, there was still absolutely no evidence that was what caused him not to see his children lol. As she said, when she called the ex, it sounded like the ex already had ongoing problems with him. Even if JM was gonna rule in his favour, from jumping from $500 to $5000 for a case with no evidence seems ludicrous. Seems very inconsistent with some of his other rulings.
she had no business CALLING HER PERIOD!!!
@@Ayana08SuperStar at all...
@@Ayana08SuperStarI agree, had nothing to do with her whatsoever.
@@Ayana08SuperStar I agree - but my point was about evidence of the effect it had vs the verdict. In other cases, JM has dismissed those types of claims. A car issue with a random woman is not what stopped him from seeing his kids lol
@@topeosaze2980that maybe the case but she had no business calling his ex wife or anyone as a matter of fact
The plaintiff was messy for calling the ex wife but I’m sure the relationship between the defendant and his ex wife was already damaged
I think he meant 500..
@@ryangray9988you’re right 😅
IMO, he and his ex-wife's relationship has nothing to do with the case. Since she is his EX-wife, their relationship was definitely damaged.
Her ignorant behind! I hope this was a lesson learnt
Wait! Why even call the defendant ex wife did she really think she'll care bout y'all issues. Idk what the planiff was thinking 🤔
Go to court dude to see your kids!!!
That $5, 000.00 will help.
@@sereneamani1713 He needs to give some of that money straight to his kids.
What an irresponsible judgement. Wow.
Interesting that it seems to be mostly females that didn't like the judgements. Seems bias
Naw it was very responsible…you don’t reach out to someone’s EX spouse…hell wrong with u
@@blackestknightx8881bc they don’t like accountability
@@_MoneyMike_ agreed
@@blackestknightx8881he blocked her number and she can’t get to her cancer treatments. In the meantime he staying up all night and sleeping all day for days at a time. She can’t call his ex to ask how to get ahold of him? That’s not gossip. She’s trying to get in touch with his trifling behind. I bet his ex wife can tell you why he isn’t seeing his kids and it ain’t got nothing to do with this lady and her car!
No money for a cab, but money for a holiday.
Lol I know she mad now she called his wife! 🙃
The plantiff seem like the type that talk to much and give unnecessary information. She probably made the ex wife believe he was still on drugs.
NOW JUDGE some ppl be social like that & super friendly with strangers
The court don’t care about people being friendly they only care about what’s right and what’s wrong
he thinks he's a comedian
@@pache7216KMMFSL😂
That's where those people fuck up at. Blabbing about their life stories. Somethings aren't meant for you to tell any and everyone. What if their business gets put out on blast and that was not their intention to be exposed to that extent. Then that's their own fault. Shouldn't be that much of a blabbermouth
Good thing our opinions don't matter in court proceedings 😂
Especially, when our opinions are not based on law.
Exactly
Some people are really not well…. Calling a ex over this mess and you could’ve went somewhere else. You really need to be careful of who you hook up with… SMH
Dude only wanted 500.00 def didn't see that coming...😮
She walk out of the courtroom quiet and pissed off Lol
Plaintiff was messy but the punishment doesn't fix the crime. The wife shouldn't keep the kids away if he is of no danger to the kids. The judge doesn't know everything about him and ex wife. What if he was abusive or owed child support? 500 dollars was enough to award her for gossip.
Something is definitely up with her....mentally 🤔
$5,000?? What? But was suing for $500, not $5,000, however it's possible to award punitive damages
I was looking for this comment bc the math wasn’t mathing
@@y_e_i8213it’s only a Nigerian that will speak this English
“The math isn’t mathing “😂😂
These things happen in court
I’m glad he got his money.
I agree with the ruling. Just because y’all had issues don’t mean reach out to the mother of his kids. Keep it between the two of you.
I agree with the ruling but the judge is wrong when he says nobody gets that emotional over a car because I definitely have and I definitely will not saying my actions would have been the same as hers
the ruling was on point....but something just dont seem to add up concerning her story of them just being friends.....and judge mathis checked her as soon as she tried to shove that BS . they just friends but she getting his ex wife involved in they simple business deal....
The dude in the red shirt never misses an episode lmaoo
He's getting paid to do his job.
I do not agree with this ruling smh. Is it not normal to reach out to other ppl that know you if you’re avoiding them?
Yes, reach out to try to contact them. Leave a message, etc. But discuss the entire business transaction and their life, NO.
That back fired didn’t it
Yes!
Mannn
I bet the plantiff think before she do anything else 😂
SHE GOT PAID FOR GOIN ON THERE
@@majik31401 I am not talking about the money
She tried to put her kids in it thinking JM was gone feel for her but the whole time her kids are grown men. She tried to use them to intimidate the defendant but his kids are actual children. JM tried to catch him up but he made his testimony make sense enough to give him credit. Then what she did by calling his Ex was a no no nopity nope nope.
Yup I’m so glad she got held accountable
Damn now you gotta pay 5k
JM mad funny I'm over here rolling.
Omg 😩😩😩 girl I woulda stayed home 😩😩
2:17 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 JM a damn fool 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Damn I bet she regret bringing him to court ! He asked for 500 and got 5k 😂
Nope! Bad judgement! She’s dealing with cancer and couldn’t get to her appointment! She didn’t badmouth him to the ex, just explained why she reached out! Ex even indicated she didn’t talk to him and appeared he already didn’t see his child! Not a good judgement At ALL!
He tried his hardest to simp and pander, "Don't try to save your reputation now" "Don't talk over me" and tried making it seem like he knew about the subject 😂 But when the defendant explained what was going on JM backtracked hard AF! JM tried to clown him about working in the rain but the defendant straightened him out. Great job!
FB is not the Avenue to make friends
or business transactions
JM gave defendant money, bet he will not share with ex😂😂😂😂😂😂
In the beginning she accused him of being a recovered addict & said things like he slept all day & was up at night that may indicate to one he relapsed. I'm sure the judge had that in mind when he thought about what was mentioned on the call.
Stage 4 is generally terminal...sheesh!
She gotta lay it on thick lol
He was wrong but she’s not a nice person to throw his business out there n said no bad things bout her
The plaintiff had no right to call his ex wife! She was wrong for that!
😮 the verdict was so biased
This ruling has really polarize the viewers
He got $5000 for her calling his ex? That’s a lil excessive….he was ignoring her calls and trying to reach him. I’m sure she didn’t mean any harm by calling her to contact him. Especially since they both said it was only a friendship.
"What do you scan it with?"
"A scanter."
🤦♀️
U know she was hoootttttt!! 😂
And why does judge always act like he knows EVERYTHING how you gon tell that mechanic his job then try to cover up his nastiness once he looked dumb
Those coils (cylinders)are a PItA. He needs to go to family court to get the rights he deserves to see his kids.
Oh man! This, that & THE 3RD?! NOT THE 3RD!!!😱
Now what if that lady has a husband/man...JM talking bout they were going together that's so messy🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️...
Then she would’ve been having an inappropriate conversation and should have been exposed…
@_MoneyMike_ the point is he should've been professional...it's not his place to expose her...what if she went home &nd got beat up anything cus "the Judge" said they're messing around...some ppl are easily influenced with nonsense...
JM is a bully and his rulings rarely make (legal) sense to me. He lacks the ability to be objective.
What specific law did JM not uphold or break?
I love it 😂🤣🤣
Hey Judge!!!❤❤❤❤
She mouth running like water and still lost😢
Im appauled. LUDRICROUS RULING.🤯....it aint easy walking..id want the luxury of a car too.... but bcos man child has cancer ..i get it empathize🙏🏼.. but NOT $5k.
500 to 5000 in 15.29 seconds. Not bad for a days pay
Wow! I think JM ruling was very harsh. The defendant was shady, point blank period! Yes you get what you pay for however the defendant not being reachable and asking for pieces one by was totally unacceptable. He had ample time to get things done and waited last minute. I do believe the plaintiff truly contacted the ex to try and reach him regarding her car and the conversation turned into her bad mouthing .obviously him and the ex had existing issues but I felt the defendant milked that to his advantage. Who stops someone from seeing their kids over a car😒Judge Mathis is PMS’n again!
This was the most ridiculous azz ruling in all of his court cases. Judge Mathis doesn't need a new court show. This was agregious! The man asked for $500 because his ex wife doesn't like him and gets $5k! This is flat out stupid. The lady has health issues and needed her damn car!
@@mrshappilymarried1 AGREED!!!
Why would you call someone’s ex if you’re not trying to be messy?
@@brettsfav4right
Love that you asked who would stop having someone from seeing their children because of a car when we see cases where females would stop having their kids see their father just because they are dating somebody else or because they just want more money or they broke up with one another so the car is not far fetched
She shouldn't have called his ex...the word ex means just that it wasn't his ex business what their dealing was...
Exactly. I find it strange that people don't understand boundaries
Exactly! Her reaching out to his ex wife was deliberate, intentional, and messy. And her messiness cost her $5k. Serves her right too.
@blackestknightx8881 that's why the judge awarded him the 5,000...she was bold so he figured his ruling would be the same...
@@royal_rootz I totally agree she was outta line...
@@NKAB4 agreed
It all goes down on Facebook trust and believe 😮
For the ones that said karma gonna bite JM for his ruling for this case seems like KARMA done bit YOU today
Because it didn't go your way 🤣 Shout Out To The wanna be always Rights 🤬🤐😯
Good judgment…she had absolutely no right to call his ex wife. Finally a woman being held accountable for her actions
He holds women accountable all the time. That’s nothing new with Judge Mathis.
@@richardbridgette1166 it’s true with the rest of the world, not speaking in terms of Mathis
@@_MoneyMike_How can you say its true with the rest of the world. Do you know the entire World and that there aren't other females who are also held accountable. You are completely off with that comment. There are other females who get the karma they deserve as they should get
@@kerry-annesimpson9646 I’m not talking about Karma silly I’m talking about ppl holding women accountable which they don’t
@@_MoneyMike_you sound butt hurt
5k? That was flat out wrong
Whoa....wait....what just happened here? I've seen people get a lot less than $5,000 after someone posted nude photos of them online.
She shouldn't have called his ex-wife but where is his proof he can't see his children over 1 phone call about a business deal gone wrong. If he has a custody agreement withholding his children wouldn't even be legal.
She has cancer & needed her car. She should've just taken it to a reputable mechanic. That would've been less than the $5k judgment.
It didn't make since 😂if you scan it it tells you to replace what number spark plug and coil packs you don't have to take apart to know that im not a mechanic but fix stuff
She owe more than the car is prolly worth 😳😳
I'm here My Beloved Favorite Judge ***ASHAY ***
I see by the comments I’m not going to be able to look at this.
I don't like how judge was coming at the defendant like he was a mechanic and not a lawyer/judge but damn $5000 for defendant ok...
She won😂😂😂
He meant 500
How so!
Judge looks very tired today
Not to bad mouth the mechanic because I’m on his side and all. My question is why doesn’t he have a garage to work on cars?
I almost hate to wstch this based on the comments 😲JM you getting in trouble with the Family big time..let me go head and watch cause the Family is rarely wrong.😂
Edit: 5k!! This has to be a joke Judge Mathis? Absolutely Wrong Judgment.
No it wasn't
That is is a meschanic.... not a mechanic. $100 for a intake manifold is too low.
Diagnostic test 9:50
She know she's wrong for calling the man ex
This is why I hardly even click on his stuff anymore and keep scrolling. To be an attorney and a judge he is totally unprofessional, uncouth, immature and just bad natured. He behaves as a bully with a robe and it makes no sense to me how he’s still on the bench. Everything isn’t a joke nor funny. God bless his wife. I know she is sick of his mess. However, I think he hit the nail on the head with them being romantically involved because no one does that over a car to that extent of contacting an ex. How’sMs she even know who she was?
Terrible. The plaintiff is a mess.
This is by far the WORST ruling I have ever seen on JM! Judge sure got this one WRONG!
He got it right. What was she doing calling his ex wife bad mouthing about some business that has nothing to do with her? Knowing they already had a rocky relationship. That's messy and it created mess for he and his children
Good thing you’re not a judge and no one cares what you think lol
That lady had NO business calling his EX wife especially when they have mutual friends that was some messy shit
I agree. He had this lady’s car, blocked her number and she couldn’t even get to her cancer appointments. She called his ex to get in touch with him. So what. His ex already hated him when she called. Come on, she’s not the reason he can’t see his kids. That dude was not the victim and now she has to pay him $5,000.😡
@morob466 Again, she should've sued like she's doing now. Or she could've called any of his other friends or family. She was intentially trying to be messy and the judge saw that. She knew him and his ex wife had issues and specifically dealing with the kids because, as she stated, they were good friends. The ruling was appropriate. Can't go around messing with people's personal lives over business
Wow I mis heard I thought he asked for 500 and he got 5k...I'm happy for him
Hahaaaa…. She big mad I bet. 5k
I paid a shade tree mechanic $800 , all I got was a CAR WASH..I filed in small claims court, he didn't appear..I won the case, but he didn't have any assets or anything of value in his name..🤑🤑🤑 I was granted a FI FA..Tuition in the school of life from the streets...