Its weird that JJ told Tarantino (about the new timeline) "Nobody likes it!" and "Do whatever you want." This confuses me, because I thought it had to be 25% different, or whatever that stupid deal was with licensing. This contradicts Tarantino's recollection of the conversation, because I would have thought because of the new licensing etc, that he would be constrained, and COULDN'T "do whatever he wants", but maybe I'm overthinking it. In other words, how much freedom does he have, versus what the public is TOLD how much freedom the directors have.
Kurtz man version is done so they can monetise that version of Kelvin timeline characters for merchandising and not legacy Star Trek TOS characterization that CBS owns. All for profit and other iterations to get franchises and associated licensing that they would own.
@@O1OO1O1 I'm a Trek fan. I especially like DS9, but I don't get too worked up about the new stuff being terrible. My solution is to not watch it, but the one thing that got my blood boiling is in season 1 of Picard when Picard dies in the arms of all these strangers. Original crew should have been there for that. But it was all just a cheap stunt that didn't mean anything because surprise he's an android now. Where's the Game Of Thrones shame lady when you need her?
@@BonzoKilbourn yes, not watching is a wise policy. I do like paying out the new fans, though. If one can't have some fun watching human society descend, it's a bit bleak.
It is pretty obvious that J.J. Abrams isn't a Star Trek fan but Quentin Tarantino is. So I think a new film with Tarantino at the helm might actually turn out pretty decent.
I don't think it will remain on ice, but he's not going to be at the helm. He clearly said that he's only going to get story credit and they hired someone else to write it and JJ Abrams will probably direct it and f*** it up.
Also Tarantino said i think that tos is a western in space.... and i think that is also why it would be pretty cool to see him make another western in space.
Wish Paramount would give Quentin more creative control to lure him back to do a Trek film. JJ's Trek was meant as frantic popcorn fun but never ascended beyond the editing. At least Quentin would give us more interpersonal drama and amp up the danger of space travel.
Nothing is beyond saving. But the people in charge do not want to save it. Just use it up until it has nothing left to give then discard it. Maybe then someone will be able to pick it up, and say 2009-2029 didn't happen.
Make it happen thousands of years before the OG trilogy and just have Shatner as this old Jedi going on his last mission. Every knows he has lost a step but he refuses to ignore the call to duty. Would be bad ass and might be a theme Shatner and Tarantino could get behind.
@@emoninjasucks I think Shatner could play a good 'master/mentor' is a big part of it... And he is the 'right age', get him some youngling that the people involved like, have him be training them... He's a lost a step but has wisdom, he's not as his physical peak, etc... Make him an elderly-guardian (consular, sentinel, guardian... if you don' know the Star Wars) and... yeah, go with it. I also love Star Trek, well... pre JJ-Trek, the stuff post... c.c ...so far it is many things, it isn't Trek. I didn't dislike Chris's portrayal of the character... But I DID loathe the storytelling methods, etc... Star Trek is Hopeful Sci-Fi... and the JJ movies and Kurtzmantrek aren't hopeful.
I would like to see a Tarantino Trek movie because he knows how to tell an engaging story. I thought Pine and Quinto were okay as Kirk and Spock. As for Urban's portrayal of Dr. McCoy, I felt he was a bit off. It's hard to describe and very subtle, but I didn't like the way Urban's McCoy manifests anger and frustration. Urban also does not exude that Southern charm that DeForest Kelley gave McCoy. Kelley was an actual Southerner (born in Georgia), and I really liked his portrayal of a medical doctor, someone who is warm, compassionate, passionate, trustworthy, humble, competent, and with a sense of humor -- the consummate physician, in my eyes. Putting it another way: I would want Kelley's McCoy to be my family physician, but I would not want Urban's McCoy to be my family physician. I do like Urban's performances in other movies/shows.
Quinto's Spock was far better than I think many appreciated. Not only does he sound Vulcan, but he sounds like he could be a young Spock. This other clown they had in Discovery and Strange, on the other hand...
He must have watched a different set of movies... I don't see how any actor in the JJ-verse nailed the original characters other than Karl Urban channeling DeForest Kelly as McCoy - writing non-withstanding... Thanks for the video.
I was always skeptical of Tarantino making a Star Trek film. After all, Pulp Fiction (as great as it was) is about as far from Trek as I can imagine. However, after hearing this interview, I suddenly want Tarantino to direct Star Trek! He would obviously do SO much better than JJ. I love Shatner’s Kirk too. And Nimoy as Spock and Deforest as Bones and the whole cast of TOS really. I used to love TNG more than TOS, but in light of Picard and the new Trek series of Kurtzman, I’m definitely more of a TOS fan now. (I’m even planning to update my thumbnail with a TOS uniform in the future.)
Agree with you completely. TOS is something I saw in reruns as a young kid, and I loved it. TNG was a phenomena when I was a young man and I came to like it even more. But rewatching some TNG episodes and also seeing where Patrick Stewart took things, the shine is off the apple.
Take away. You only get Tarantino when you get Chris and Zackery on. Which not being able to afford them is the whole reason they haven't done one already. Sooooooo the damage JJ has done to the franchise and it's mishandling over the years will all but stop this from being made due to again, money.
Abrams said he made his Trek for movie fans. He is obviously talking about the most base movie goer, people who don't want to think too hard and they want to see lots of things go "boom".
They don't nail it. The Kirk and Spock in JJ Abrams' trash are NOT the characters we came to love in the original Star Trek. Their thought processes are completely different.
I agree. They play more to the tropes of the characters than the characters themselves. I don't fault the actors though; most of JarJars work is superficial and definitively mediocre.
Absolutely! Kirk doubting the point of space exploraiton and wanting some other job?!? Quintos Spock always had this subliminal anger that didn't fit to spock at all. So i wouldn't say they nailed it tbh. (These are just two random points of a sea of things that annoy me about those movies.)
Totally agree. However, maybe he was taking more about the actors performances rather than the actual written characters. I think Pine and Quinto could play excellent versions of Kirk and Spock… IF the characters were written better. Spock is not supposed to be a badass action hero, and Kirk is not supposed to be a whiny and spoiled millennial.
He doesn’t say “JJ Abram’s Kirk and Spock”, so clearly he’s referring to delivery and performance; he was impressed by PINE’s James T Kirk and QUINTO’s Spock… neither actor wrote character lines or storyboard
@@hellfish2309 The delivery and performance was in no way anything like that of William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy. No amount of sophistry is going to make Pine and Zachary into Kirk and Spock. They weren't and will never be. AbramsTrek is not Star Trek.
In 3:11 he sums up what’s right, what’s wrong and how to fix it. I love the actors in the movies and just want them to sink their collective teeth into an actual Star Trek script. With good directing and editing we’d have something.
It's a depressing thing, JJ knows no one wants his Trek, but they still shit out a 3rd one. And if Tarantino believes the actors embodiment the character, he should stay far away from Star Trek too!
The third one... the third one had a good Dr Bones, he was young and not grumpy for the most part, but he was still worthy of being A star trek character if not our original bones, I liked the third one. I am just going to say it, and I like... elements, of the second one, I like some of the ideas they were using just they should have handled it a bit differently
@@aurorauplinks Karl urban was a recently good bones, I agree with you there. Nothing against the other actors. They are doing as directed. I checked it out after into darkness. I know the 3rd is the least annoying of them. I am glad you enjoyed it. Frankly I loved Star Trek. But it is gone now. I would like it laid to rest now!
@@kevesdancey Don't worry, i agree its crappy, I want it to be so much better then it is, I finally had enough and started writing my own short stories to replace events in trek and star wars, and am taking animation classes, because I want to start a series of short fan cartoons to try to make the story somewhat better for star wars at least. I cant prevent the events from happening, but I can at least do something to fix the characters perhaps :( I started writing a rewrite of Picard too just for fun. but I don't think I will finish it, too much time for no gain.
@@aurorauplinks that sounds great!! Definitely better than the 3 year old wax crayon crap Picard really is. But I do very much understand the sentiment of too much time for no gain! I wish you luck if you continue for your own star trek story. Its the only way star trek can be any good now!
The only director that would keep true to the original intention of Star Trek. Quintin has never misinterpreted a genre. He would come from a place of love for the material.
I disagree about Chris Pine playing like William Shatner as James T. Kirk, but because of the shite writing. If the script had been written to have Kirk as Shatner has played him, Chris Pine would have done that.
I saw a lot of Shatner in Pine's performance but yes people get hung up on what the movies do, the movies suck but the actual performance of the cast was actually well done unlike STD where every other scene is someone yelling or crying or pumping into walls and shit....total ineptitude by klutzman.....and total negligence by Jar Jar Abrams battle-tank.....
No doubt that the script is to blame but I honestly think Pine still would have been weak with a better script. Unlike Shatner who has a star quality to compensate for his so-so acting skills, Pine is simply wooden.
I thought the first film was fantastic. Got to be one of my favourite movies of all time. I think the magnificent score helped a lot but Abrams pacing was perfect.
Yeah I love those Star Trek movies a lot. Not so much part 3 but I don't hate it. Wish they made 3 more. That cast is the best mirror of the original. Love the chemistry, the Humor all of it.
@@MidnightsEdgeAfterDark Thanks. Yeah this would be great to see and it would be a huge stroke of luck if we still get it. Fingers crossed Thanks for sharing this.
To be honest the prime timeline terminology is a load of crap, they try to call the original series timeline the prime timeline, when in reality Nimoy Spock in the 2009 movie came from the Picard timeline.
I think technically they arent in the prime timeline, I think they take place after the events of 2009 star trek and that is why everything is twisted and wrong.
@@aurorauplinks They use the term prime time line to describe the original series timeline but if you look at picard the romulan being destroyed incident doesn't even happen after voyager, it only happens in an alternate universe.
@@DarthVader-1701 im good with that theory, cause the whole thing sounds like crazy time war events more then anything, just send someone in a starship to sling shot around a star at warp with a vulcan aboard to calculate it, and go and stop the destruction of the romulan system. bam.
JJ admitted that he wasn't smart enough to understand Trek and was just trying to make it accessible to someone like himself, and the Kelvin Timeline works as an introduction to it. Quentin would've made Discovery look like Villeneuve's Dune by comparison: th-cam.com/video/v3Nv2R9Acec/w-d-xo.htmlsi=iXr6VZsSiRJSDZiA
This interview is old news, isn't it? Any significance to posting it now that I'm missing? You know, other than Star Trek still falling down the endless blackhole that is it's ruin at the hands of Bad Reboot while CBS can't decide whether to ignore it nervously, or cheer for it's stunning and brave suicide.
Pine and Quinto were passable but neither nailed it. Pine is as very poor Shatner as Kirk, and Quinto leaks emotions as poorly as the villains in Equilibrium. Only guy who nailed it was Karl Urban.
Indeed, it's a matter of taste. Classic Star Trek is more pure "Science Fiction" while Star Wars is more "Science Fantasy." Traditional Star Trek contains much less fantasy (magic) than Star Wars. NuTrek (i.e., Star Twrecked), however, is scientifically nonsensical; your understanding of science gets worse by watching NuTrek. Personally, I love classic Star Trek, while I like classic Star Wars. JJ Trek is bad (though I thought 2009 movie was dumb fun); Kurtzman Trek is horrible beyond words.
Apples and oranges Star Trek at it’s purest was a beacon of hope in a very bad time of civil change and unrest. That used metaphor to examine social issues. Star Wars is the hero’s journey in a sci-fi setting space opera. They both serve different purposes.
There's so so so MUCH I hate about what JJ did to Star Trek, like SO MUCH! The actors are the only good thing in those two movies, the only one! Oh... and Bones introduction, that was really in character. The one thing I have to hate the most is the destruction of Vulcan, he destroyed a whole ass planet, a very important planet in the Star Trek universe, like frigging nothing, and then did NOTHING WITH IT! I can't watch this kind of things... I get very passionate very fast. The important thing is, I'll rather have the next movie made by Tarantino than JJ Abrams, more important, I wish JJ Abrams to never touch anything I've liked, ever again, Star Wars included.
Tarantino's a better director than JJ Abrams (obviously), but would we really want a Trek that ended with a hyper-violent, death filled shoot-out? Because you know that's where Tarantino would go.
the reboot its mostly superficial action films based on the original series and that's how most should take it, why would that be changed? is a parallels universe to fit the brain damaged cinematic demand of now a days, so to me it would be a perfect ending. if we want a better trek movie saga that should a be a reboot well assembled with the original timeline based on idk the 2400 and build from the ground up and not on jj's trash. (same thing should do star wars)
Tarantino should stay away from Star Trek. Not because I don't think he would do a good movie, but because his movies tend to be different. New stories/ideas, not the rehashing of old franchises that have been chewed up and spit out as current day political ammo. The current IP owners of franchises like Star Trek don't need to receive a lifeline to continue their zealous charge.
"I don't like that, I don't appreciate it, fuck that" pretty much how most people feel about jj/kurtzman trek.
Its weird that JJ told Tarantino (about the new timeline) "Nobody likes it!" and "Do whatever you want." This confuses me, because I thought it had to be 25% different, or whatever that stupid deal was with licensing. This contradicts Tarantino's recollection of the conversation, because I would have thought because of the new licensing etc, that he would be constrained, and COULDN'T "do whatever he wants", but maybe I'm overthinking it. In other words, how much freedom does he have, versus what the public is TOLD how much freedom the directors have.
Kurtz man version is done so they can monetise that version of Kelvin timeline characters for merchandising and not legacy Star Trek TOS characterization that CBS owns. All for profit and other iterations to get franchises and associated licensing that they would own.
"JJ can´t explain...." anything.
He's his own "mystery box"...what a tool!✌🏽
Can't even explain his Star Wars films, lol.
The mystery box was always empty.
There is a reason why JJ hasn't gotten any work after Star Wars. Rian Johnson has. So who is the actual HACK?
Tarantino: "I don't like that, I don't appreciate it, fuck that"
Every Trek fan ever: What he said!!!
But didn't you love seeing Picard, Icheb, Q, Hugh, and Seven's character die and as amazing, 11/10 TV???
@@O1OO1O1 I'm a Trek fan. I especially like DS9, but I don't get too worked up about the new stuff being terrible. My solution is to not watch it, but the one thing that got my blood boiling is in season 1 of Picard when Picard dies in the arms of all these strangers. Original crew should have been there for that. But it was all just a cheap stunt that didn't mean anything because surprise he's an android now. Where's the Game Of Thrones shame lady when you need her?
@@BonzoKilbourn yes, not watching is a wise policy. I do like paying out the new fans, though. If one can't have some fun watching human society descend, it's a bit bleak.
It is pretty obvious that J.J. Abrams isn't a Star Trek fan but Quentin Tarantino is. So I think a new film with Tarantino at the helm might actually turn out pretty decent.
JJ literally said he was not into Trek growing up on a Jon Steward Daily Show interview.
I don't think it will remain on ice, but he's not going to be at the helm. He clearly said that he's only going to get story credit and they hired someone else to write it and JJ Abrams will probably direct it and f*** it up.
Also Tarantino said i think that tos is a western in space.... and i think that is also why it would be pretty cool to see him make another western in space.
@@DorkKnightLV Like Kurtzman and company from Secret Hideout?
JJ sucks but i dont think tarantino would be much better, he only knows how to make one type of movie
Wish Paramount would give Quentin more creative control to lure him back to do a Trek film. JJ's Trek was meant as frantic popcorn fun but never ascended beyond the editing. At least Quentin would give us more interpersonal drama and amp up the danger of space travel.
Trek is beyond saving.
No it's not. A far future civilisation will find it and save it, like in AI.
Nothing is beyond saving. But the people in charge do not want to save it. Just use it up until it has nothing left to give then discard it. Maybe then someone will be able to pick it up, and say 2009-2029 didn't happen.
Ah, I do love admiring the artifacts displayed in the Gallery of Missed Opportunities.
Agree with him on the 1st part, but I NEVER once confused Chris Pine with Captain Kirk.
...is it wrong I would like to see Tarantino do a Star Wars film with Shatner as an elderly Jedi? >.>
Does he look like a Sith!? *aggresively points blaster at jarjar*
Make it happen thousands of years before the OG trilogy and just have Shatner as this old Jedi going on his last mission. Every knows he has lost a step but he refuses to ignore the call to duty. Would be bad ass and might be a theme Shatner and Tarantino could get behind.
I might actually take interest in such a project.
@@emoninjasucks I think Shatner could play a good 'master/mentor' is a big part of it... And he is the 'right age', get him some youngling that the people involved like, have him be training them... He's a lost a step but has wisdom, he's not as his physical peak, etc... Make him an elderly-guardian (consular, sentinel, guardian... if you don' know the Star Wars) and... yeah, go with it.
I also love Star Trek, well... pre JJ-Trek, the stuff post... c.c ...so far it is many things, it isn't Trek. I didn't dislike Chris's portrayal of the character... But I DID loathe the storytelling methods, etc... Star Trek is Hopeful Sci-Fi... and the JJ movies and Kurtzmantrek aren't hopeful.
I would like to see a Tarantino Trek movie because he knows how to tell an engaging story. I thought Pine and Quinto were okay as Kirk and Spock. As for Urban's portrayal of Dr. McCoy, I felt he was a bit off. It's hard to describe and very subtle, but I didn't like the way Urban's McCoy manifests anger and frustration. Urban also does not exude that Southern charm that DeForest Kelley gave McCoy. Kelley was an actual Southerner (born in Georgia), and I really liked his portrayal of a medical doctor, someone who is warm, compassionate, passionate, trustworthy, humble, competent, and with a sense of humor -- the consummate physician, in my eyes. Putting it another way: I would want Kelley's McCoy to be my family physician, but I would not want Urban's McCoy to be my family physician. I do like Urban's performances in other movies/shows.
Quinto's Spock was far better than I think many appreciated. Not only does he sound Vulcan, but he sounds like he could be a young Spock.
This other clown they had in Discovery and Strange, on the other hand...
He must have watched a different set of movies... I don't see how any actor in the JJ-verse nailed the original characters other than Karl Urban channeling DeForest Kelly as McCoy - writing non-withstanding...
Thanks for the video.
Yes, Karl Urban is fantastic as Bones.
@@putinscat1208 😭
Poor Anton Yelchin...
Karl Urban was the hero for 3 as much as their could have been anything good in it
Agreed, Karl Urban was the only one who nailed it.
@@putinscat1208 I know... Just horrible.
I was always skeptical of Tarantino making a Star Trek film. After all, Pulp Fiction (as great as it was) is about as far from Trek as I can imagine.
However, after hearing this interview, I suddenly want Tarantino to direct Star Trek! He would obviously do SO much better than JJ. I love Shatner’s Kirk too. And Nimoy as Spock and Deforest as Bones and the whole cast of TOS really.
I used to love TNG more than TOS, but in light of Picard and the new Trek series of Kurtzman, I’m definitely more of a TOS fan now. (I’m even planning to update my thumbnail with a TOS uniform in the future.)
Agree with you completely. TOS is something I saw in reruns as a young kid, and I loved it. TNG was a phenomena when I was a young man and I came to like it even more. But rewatching some TNG episodes and also seeing where Patrick Stewart took things, the shine is off the apple.
@@jdraven0890If Piicard was real he would probably give one of his famous speeches about how much of a clown Patrick Stewart is.
Take away. You only get Tarantino when you get Chris and Zackery on. Which not being able to afford them is the whole reason they haven't done one already. Sooooooo the damage JJ has done to the franchise and it's mishandling over the years will all but stop this from being made due to again, money.
im pretty sure these guys would take a hit in their pocket to work with Quentin
Abrams said he made his Trek for movie fans. He is obviously talking about the most base movie goer, people who don't want to think too hard and they want to see lots of things go "boom".
where is the full interview? i would love to hear the whole thing.
AMEN... Ignore It 🖖
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Totally sums up how useless Jar Jar Abrams/Alex Turdsman's Star Drek
They don't nail it. The Kirk and Spock in JJ Abrams' trash are NOT the characters we came to love in the original Star Trek. Their thought processes are completely different.
I agree. They play more to the tropes of the characters than the characters themselves. I don't fault the actors though; most of JarJars work is superficial and definitively mediocre.
Absolutely!
Kirk doubting the point of space exploraiton and wanting some other job?!?
Quintos Spock always had this subliminal anger that didn't fit to spock at all.
So i wouldn't say they nailed it tbh.
(These are just two random points of a sea of things that annoy me about those movies.)
Totally agree. However, maybe he was taking more about the actors performances rather than the actual written characters. I think Pine and Quinto could play excellent versions of Kirk and Spock… IF the characters were written better. Spock is not supposed to be a badass action hero, and Kirk is not supposed to be a whiny and spoiled millennial.
He doesn’t say “JJ Abram’s Kirk and Spock”, so clearly he’s referring to delivery and performance; he was impressed by PINE’s James T Kirk and QUINTO’s Spock… neither actor wrote character lines or storyboard
@@hellfish2309 The delivery and performance was in no way anything like that of William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy. No amount of sophistry is going to make Pine and Zachary into Kirk and Spock. They weren't and will never be. AbramsTrek is not Star Trek.
In 3:11 he sums up what’s right, what’s wrong and how to fix it. I love the actors in the movies and just want them to sink their collective teeth into an actual Star Trek script. With good directing and editing we’d have something.
JJ can't finish anything even if his life was on the line.
I think he has creative attention deficit disorder.
@@marsoelflaco5722 CADD ...that's good, man.
I learned that lesson after Lost. All of his mystery boxes are empty.
It's a depressing thing, JJ knows no one wants his Trek, but they still shit out a 3rd one. And if Tarantino believes the actors embodiment the character, he should stay far away from Star Trek too!
The third one... the third one had a good Dr Bones, he was young and not grumpy for the most part, but he was still worthy of being A star trek character if not our original bones, I liked the third one. I am just going to say it, and I like... elements, of the second one, I like some of the ideas they were using just they should have handled it a bit differently
@@aurorauplinks Karl urban was a recently good bones, I agree with you there. Nothing against the other actors. They are doing as directed.
I checked it out after into darkness. I know the 3rd is the least annoying of them. I am glad you enjoyed it. Frankly I loved Star Trek. But it is gone now. I would like it laid to rest now!
@@kevesdancey Don't worry, i agree its crappy, I want it to be so much better then it is, I finally had enough and started writing my own short stories to replace events in trek and star wars, and am taking animation classes, because I want to start a series of short fan cartoons to try to make the story somewhat better for star wars at least. I cant prevent the events from happening, but I can at least do something to fix the characters perhaps :(
I started writing a rewrite of Picard too just for fun. but I don't think I will finish it, too much time for no gain.
@@aurorauplinks that sounds great!! Definitely better than the 3 year old wax crayon crap Picard really is. But I do very much understand the sentiment of too much time for no gain! I wish you luck if you continue for your own star trek story. Its the only way star trek can be any good now!
If anyone could do this franchise justice, i think Tarantino could
The only director that would keep true to the original intention of Star Trek. Quintin has never misinterpreted a genre. He would come from a place of love for the material.
The dude thinks that Wild West bounty hunters were freelance executioners. He misinterprets everything.
He couldn’t be more wrong saying Pine and Quinto nailed those characters
I disagree about Chris Pine playing like William Shatner as James T. Kirk, but because of the shite writing. If the script had been written to have Kirk as Shatner has played him, Chris Pine would have done that.
I saw a lot of Shatner in Pine's performance but yes people get hung up on what the movies do, the movies suck but the actual performance of the cast was actually well done unlike STD where every other scene is someone yelling or crying or pumping into walls and shit....total ineptitude by klutzman.....and total negligence by Jar Jar Abrams battle-tank.....
No doubt that the script is to blame but I honestly think Pine still would have been weak with a better script. Unlike Shatner who has a star quality to compensate for his so-so acting skills, Pine is simply wooden.
When did this interview happen? Can't be recent, I heard Tarantino gave up on the Star Trek project years ago.
Chris Pine and Zachery Q. both met there previous actor counterparts who played Kirk and Spock receiving their blessings.
you know i have to give J.J. some amount of credit to the fact the he knows he makes shit movies
Never really been into him but this is so nice to hear.
Mr Tarantino is part of the Fandom Menace, confirmed.
Tarantino is speaking Facts. Also nice of having JJ in that South Park art style.
is that Josh Horowitz? he's such a dork, i love him
Maybe the casting of JJ-trek was largely good but little else was...
...and the death spiral for Star Trek has gathered pace ever since.
The only one who nailed it was Karl Urban, everyone else failed hard, no resemblance to the original characters whatsoever.
Abrams simply wanted to make his own Star Wars franchise.
Karl Urban as McCoy too. Spot on. Tarantino should do a follow up to Karl Urban Judge Dredd.
I thought the first film was fantastic. Got to be one of my favourite movies of all time. I think the magnificent score helped a lot but Abrams pacing was perfect.
Love this.
Star ⭐ Trek ! Get woke 🌈 ! Go broke 💸 ! Ha ! Ha ! Ha ! Hilarious 😂
His logic is sound! 🖖
Gods bless you Quentin.
Why does God give franchises to those who can't aprecciatte them?
Yeah I love those Star Trek movies a lot. Not so much part 3 but I don't hate it. Wish they made 3 more. That cast is the best mirror of the original. Love the chemistry, the Humor all of it.
cant wait to see Tarantino get clucked... if he gets tangled up with this project...
I actually prefer Kelvin Timeline over the Prime. Lol.
Where did you dig that clip up from? Wasn't that interview from like 5 years ago? lol!
How old is this interview?
couple years
@@MidnightsEdgeAfterDark Thanks. Yeah this would be great to see and it would be a huge stroke of luck if we still get it. Fingers crossed
Thanks for sharing this.
I like the JJ Trek films more than Discovery and Picard. At least the JJ movies don't pretend to be in the prime timeline.
Me too but that's a pretty low bar.
To be honest the prime timeline terminology is a load of crap, they try to call the original series timeline the prime timeline, when in reality Nimoy Spock in the 2009 movie came from the Picard timeline.
I think technically they arent in the prime timeline, I think they take place after the events of 2009 star trek and that is why everything is twisted and wrong.
@@aurorauplinks They use the term prime time line to describe the original series timeline but if you look at picard the romulan being destroyed incident doesn't even happen after voyager, it only happens in an alternate universe.
@@DarthVader-1701 im good with that theory, cause the whole thing sounds like crazy time war events more then anything, just send someone in a starship to sling shot around a star at warp with a vulcan aboard to calculate it, and go and stop the destruction of the romulan system. bam.
JJ admitted that he wasn't smart enough to understand Trek and was just trying to make it accessible to someone like himself, and the Kelvin Timeline works as an introduction to it. Quentin would've made Discovery look like Villeneuve's Dune by comparison: th-cam.com/video/v3Nv2R9Acec/w-d-xo.htmlsi=iXr6VZsSiRJSDZiA
This interview is old news, isn't it? Any significance to posting it now that I'm missing?
You know, other than Star Trek still falling down the endless blackhole that is it's ruin at the hands of Bad Reboot while CBS can't decide whether to ignore it nervously, or cheer for it's stunning and brave suicide.
Pine and Quinto were passable but neither nailed it. Pine is as very poor Shatner as Kirk, and Quinto leaks emotions as poorly as the villains in Equilibrium. Only guy who nailed it was Karl Urban.
I agree about Pine, disagree about Zach who is a phenomenal Spock.
Based.
What's the slang term for qlj in Klingon, I'm asking a friend.
How is Chris Pine running around like a clueless toddler on adderol “nailing” William Shatner’s Kirk?
0:12 sorry, I can't comment on this!!! :)
Could someone please provide the context of what we're listening to?
Chris Pine time line... and I'm out!
Jesus that would be so awesome. Never happen.
I love Tarentino. But Treks not better than Star Wars
Star Trek is way better
Indeed, it's a matter of taste. Classic Star Trek is more pure "Science Fiction" while Star Wars is more "Science Fantasy." Traditional Star Trek contains much less fantasy (magic) than Star Wars. NuTrek (i.e., Star Twrecked), however, is scientifically nonsensical; your understanding of science gets worse by watching NuTrek. Personally, I love classic Star Trek, while I like classic Star Wars. JJ Trek is bad (though I thought 2009 movie was dumb fun); Kurtzman Trek is horrible beyond words.
Apples and oranges Star Trek at it’s purest was a beacon of hope in a very bad time of civil change and unrest. That used metaphor to examine social issues. Star Wars is the hero’s journey in a sci-fi setting space opera. They both serve different purposes.
It depends on what you like. Trek is typically about philosophical dilemmas and actual Sci-Fi. Star Wars is action and fantasy.
“Nobody likes it” Exactly.
There's so so so MUCH I hate about what JJ did to Star Trek, like SO MUCH! The actors are the only good thing in those two movies, the only one! Oh... and Bones introduction, that was really in character. The one thing I have to hate the most is the destruction of Vulcan, he destroyed a whole ass planet, a very important planet in the Star Trek universe, like frigging nothing, and then did NOTHING WITH IT!
I can't watch this kind of things... I get very passionate very fast.
The important thing is, I'll rather have the next movie made by Tarantino than JJ Abrams, more important, I wish JJ Abrams to never touch anything I've liked, ever again, Star Wars included.
I've decided that JJ Abrams' glasses have managed to prevent a lot of people from realizing he's just a pretentious version of Michael Bay.
Tarantino's a better director than JJ Abrams (obviously), but would we really want a Trek that ended with a hyper-violent, death filled shoot-out?
Because you know that's where Tarantino would go.
the reboot its mostly superficial action films based on the original series and that's how most should take it, why would that be changed? is a parallels universe to fit the brain damaged cinematic demand of now a days, so to me it would be a perfect ending. if we want a better trek movie saga that should a be a reboot well assembled with the original timeline based on idk the 2400 and build from the ground up and not on jj's trash. (same thing should do star wars)
This is a re-upload, no?
We've played it before on streams and it's been in an edited form in videos but not sure it's ever been up on it's own
@@MidnightsEdgeAfterDark Yeah, I think I saw it as part of a longer video
JJ will be known for the man to have ruined two legendary franchises. Thank God Paramount Plus saved star trek
A wasted opportunity.
Tarantino should stay away from Star Trek. Not because I don't think he would do a good movie, but because his movies tend to be different. New stories/ideas, not the rehashing of old franchises that have been chewed up and spit out as current day political ammo. The current IP owners of franchises like Star Trek don't need to receive a lifeline to continue their zealous charge.
At least we know that JJ Abrahams was confronted by somebody that loves Star Trek. However, I liked the "new" Kahn. Apologize for my bad taste.
Tarantino might be able to save this badly failing franchise, they should let him at it.
JJ trek is just like JJ Star Wars utter crap