I just bought M50. I love it. I bought 22 f 2.0 which is amazing. BUT every other Ef-M option (except perhaps 11-22) sucks big time. No native primes, no native fisheye. Nothing close to Canon's own FL 55mm 1.2 , e.g. . I want another lens for my trip, would love to love the 18-150 for convenience but can't stomach the image quality. Canon has to get serious about this product line. They're calling the M50 a beginner camera-which it's not-except for the adverts that pop up on the screen when you switch functions. This camera has Digic 8 processor which is a serious piece of tech. Please make this line worthy of serious photographers.
Laurence Goldman I agree with you. However, Canon has to protect their higher divisions. Therefore, this series will be limited. Thus, they are calling this beginners camera. They also disabled dual-pixel AF at 4K on purpose.
Hi there! The kit lens is capable of creating a good shallow depth of field. However, you may want to check out the impressive EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens too. Find out more about it at Canon.us/9wvwx We hope this helps!
You mean low death of field? I advice to get the adapter and the 50 mm f/1.8 STM. The best in EF-M is the 32 mm f/1.4. You can get a crude value on how good it is just by dividing the focal length with the aperture i.e 50 mm / 1.8 = 28 mm. This is the maximum background blur measured on the focal plane. Similarly 32 mm / 1.4 = 23 mm and 22 mm / 2 = 11 mm. The kit lens is 45 mm / 6.3 = 7 mm. Of course you should also consider the field of view that it is appropriate- I generally prefer native lenses as adapting ruins the small size but the 50 mm is compact even with the adapter.It is same length a the 11-22 mm or 18-55 mm but ticker.
Hi... Greetings from Indonesia. Really love your video, very informative. Pls advise, as I couldn't decide which one to choose: 18-150mm or 55-200mm? I already have 18-55 kit lens and 22mm foced lens. Am looking for a telephoto lens, actually. So 55-200 would suit me best. Yet, 18-150 is really attractive as it can serve as all-rounder lense: wide and zoom at the same time. So, pls give me some advices here. Thanks... !
Hi! The best for you will really depend on how you prefer to use your system. If you do not mind changing lenses every now and then, the EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM lens is the perfect addition to your camera bag. Since you already have the range from 18-55mm covered, this will give you the best overall range. However, as you mentioned, if you prefer to stick with a single lens because it is easier to go pretty much anywhere with minimal gear or effort, the EF-M 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM is the best choice. We hope this helps!
The crop factor on M series is x1.6, but how much more crop factor after putting the lens adapter? Is it x1.5 more. So if my lens is 15mm it would be (15 x 1.6 x 1.5 = 36mm) with the converter. Please confirm this.
Hi there! The Mount Adapter EF-EOS M allows non EF-M lenses to be used on the EF-M mount. The crop factor of 1.6x from the APS-C sensor in the camera still remains and there is no additional cropping. We hope this helps!
Te crop factor is the property of the sensor. The adapter does not change it. The adapter has no optics, it is essentially a 26 mm metal tube that has an EF-M mount on the other end and an EF-S mount on the other. It has two purposes: set the lend at the proper distance and carry the electric signals. A 15 mm lens would be 15 mm even after the adapter but it would have an angle of view like 24 mm on the full frame - just as the 15-45 mm kit zoom has at wide end.
Hi! While we don't currently have an adapter that converts RF lenses to the EF-M mount, Mount Adapter EF-EOS M lets you use any EF or EF-S lens on your EOS M-series camera. Check it out at canon.us/f9r6u Hope this helps!
@@CanonUSA aww thanks so much I got one for Christmas and I am really loving it. I was wondering if you could maybe help me to get the slow motion on my camera
@@amyelliott9552 actually, Canon kinda dropped the ball on this answer. All M cameras since the first one have been able to record in 60p at varying resolutions, which is what most people use to get slow motion footage by slowing it down 50% to 30p in post. You can also slow it down in-camera by pressing Q during playback to bring up the controls, it's right next to the play button. What it doesn't have is a super slow mo mode of 120p. Hope you're enjoying your M camera!
I would love a 50mm wit f/1.8 or 1.6 for the eos m rgoht now been prdering to try out third party lenses witch pretty much cost nothing cuz lets admit it. Five years since eos m first gen release and the old lenses is still full retail and. Atleast over here...
Use the adapter (I use a Viltrox model adapter - 29$ USD on aliexpress.com) + 50mm f1.8 and it's great :) Follow my instagram account for some samples - andreivladpopa nickname.
Juan Alvarado nailed it. I have an EOS m100, and I like the size for travel (I do a bunch of business travel), and I HATE the lens options. Slow. Slow. Slow. 11-22, 22 (I have both). Came with the 15-45 so I cover 22 three different times... Stupid. Then there is a macro also overlapping the kit lens, and an 18-55 (another that covers 22), and then the 18-150 (another 22 mm).
@@ericbulington2421 you speak as if they have five different 22mm primes lol. Every lens you mentioned is different from the last, let's not exagerrate. Adapt or go third party, but you're not bound to first party glass alone.
I don't like the assortment of lenses that Canon has supplied. The lens selection has made me decide to go either the 4/3 or the Sony 6500 route if I wanted a mirrorless or smaller camera.
Who put that Roboter in front of the camera.
Can you make a stardand zoom with fixed f2.8 or f2 aperture? I'd like a 24-70mm equivalent on my M6 mark ii
M system was and still is exactly the type of system I love to use - R is no alternative.
Hey, canon I really like your m series. I just wanted to ask if there is any good ef-m lenses coming out soon?
Thanks for the compliment! Anytime we have a new lens to announce, you can be sure we'll drop a video about it, so be sure to subscribe!
@@CanonUSA this basically translates to „no, now go suck on these“
A higher quality zoom would be nice, take 15-60 2.8-4
Come on Canon, how about a 15-80 for a general purpose lens for my M50.
There's an 18-150mm EF-M lens for broad use.
Loved the 22mm f2.... until I used Fujifilm.
The 22mm is easily the best bang for buck on a budget
Sharp throughout from f2!
You prefer fuji?
I just bought M50. I love it. I bought 22 f 2.0 which is amazing. BUT every other Ef-M option (except perhaps 11-22) sucks big time. No native primes, no native fisheye. Nothing close to Canon's own FL 55mm 1.2 , e.g. . I want another lens for my trip, would love to love the 18-150 for convenience but can't stomach the image quality. Canon has to get serious about this product line. They're calling the M50 a beginner camera-which it's not-except for the adverts that pop up on the screen when you switch functions. This camera has Digic 8 processor which is a serious piece of tech. Please make this line worthy of serious photographers.
Laurence Goldman I agree with you. However, Canon has to protect their higher divisions. Therefore, this series will be limited. Thus, they are calling this beginners camera. They also disabled dual-pixel AF at 4K on purpose.
Sorry bro. Its better to sell your canon and come back to it when They finally have better lenses 10 years from now. 👍
You sound like a camera snob.
Rest in peace, EF-M.
Awesome video thank you for the tips
What is the best EF-M lense for creating depth of field? Can I do that with kit lens
Hi there! The kit lens is capable of creating a good shallow depth of field. However, you may want to check out the impressive EF-M 22mm f/2 STM lens too. Find out more about it at Canon.us/9wvwx We hope this helps!
There are really only 2 traditional DoF options for the M mounts: the 22mm f/2 they mentioned or the adapter and then use one of your EF lenses...
You mean low death of field? I advice to get the adapter and the 50 mm f/1.8 STM. The best in EF-M is the 32 mm f/1.4. You can get a crude value on how good it is just by dividing the focal length with the aperture i.e 50 mm / 1.8 = 28 mm. This is the maximum background blur measured on the focal plane. Similarly 32 mm / 1.4 = 23 mm and 22 mm / 2 = 11 mm. The kit lens is 45 mm / 6.3 = 7 mm. Of course you should also consider the field of view that it is appropriate-
I generally prefer native lenses as adapting ruins the small size but the 50 mm is compact even with the adapter.It is same length a the 11-22 mm or 18-55 mm but ticker.
Please give us a 50 or 60mm Macro F2.8 like every other mount system in existence. Why discontinue the 60mm for EF-S and not supply an EF-M version???
Hi... Greetings from Indonesia. Really love your video, very informative. Pls advise, as I couldn't decide which one to choose: 18-150mm or 55-200mm? I already have 18-55 kit lens and 22mm foced lens. Am looking for a telephoto lens, actually. So 55-200 would suit me best. Yet, 18-150 is really attractive as it can serve as all-rounder lense: wide and zoom at the same time. So, pls give me some advices here. Thanks... !
Hi! The best for you will really depend on how you prefer to use your system. If you do not mind changing lenses every now and then, the EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM lens is the perfect addition to your camera bag. Since you already have the range from 18-55mm covered, this will give you the best overall range. However, as you mentioned, if you prefer to stick with a single lens because it is easier to go pretty much anywhere with minimal gear or effort, the EF-M 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM is the best choice. We hope this helps!
So after seeing the advice of CanonUSA, do you have a better choice, which one you have bought. How is it. Can you tell me. Thanks!
The crop factor on M series is x1.6, but how much more crop factor after putting the lens adapter? Is it x1.5 more. So if my lens is 15mm it would be (15 x 1.6 x 1.5 = 36mm) with the converter. Please confirm this.
Hi there! The Mount Adapter EF-EOS M allows non EF-M lenses to be used on the EF-M mount. The crop factor of 1.6x from the APS-C sensor in the camera still remains and there is no additional cropping. We hope this helps!
Te crop factor is the property of the sensor. The adapter does not change it. The adapter has no optics, it is essentially a 26 mm metal tube that has an EF-M mount on the other end and an EF-S mount on the other. It has two purposes: set the lend at the proper distance and carry the electric signals.
A 15 mm lens would be 15 mm even after the adapter but it would have an angle of view like 24 mm on the full frame - just as the 15-45 mm kit zoom has at wide end.
the $30 ones off amazon work just as good :D
Hi, do you know any cheapo wide angle lenses for the m100?
@@thetonycam3944 Rokinon 12mm f2, or 7artisans if you want cheaper while still decent.
Hi. can i know that we can adapt RF lens to M series cameras'?
Hi! While we don't currently have an adapter that converts RF lenses to the EF-M mount, Mount Adapter EF-EOS M lets you use any EF or EF-S lens on your EOS M-series camera. Check it out at canon.us/f9r6u
Hope this helps!
Is the Canon m100 a good little camera to get
Hi Amy! The EOS M100 is a great compact camera to get! Find out more about it at Canon.us/zkz78
@@CanonUSA aww thanks so much I got one for Christmas and I am really loving it. I was wondering if you could maybe help me to get the slow motion on my camera
@@amyelliott9552 This camera does not have the slow motion feature. Thank you for reaching out to us.
@@CanonUSA aww thanks for letting me know
@@amyelliott9552 actually, Canon kinda dropped the ball on this answer. All M cameras since the first one have been able to record in 60p at varying resolutions, which is what most people use to get slow motion footage by slowing it down 50% to 30p in post. You can also slow it down in-camera by pressing Q during playback to bring up the controls, it's right next to the play button. What it doesn't have is a super slow mo mode of 120p. Hope you're enjoying your M camera!
Please create a 50mm at least with f/2 aperture
Bob Calderon I’d rather have a 35mm.
VariTimo I’d like to focus in portrait photography hence the suggestion. But the 35mm is a good option too!
I would love a 50mm wit f/1.8 or 1.6 for the eos m rgoht now been prdering to try out third party lenses witch pretty much cost nothing cuz lets admit it. Five years since eos m first gen release and the old lenses is still full retail and. Atleast over here...
Use the adapter (I use a Viltrox model adapter - 29$ USD on aliexpress.com) + 50mm f1.8 and it's great :)
Follow my instagram account for some samples - andreivladpopa nickname.
Get the adapter and the nifty fiddy
Why are there only 7 lenses
Lol 7 and like 5 are slow zooms that overlap each other 😂
Juan Alvarado nailed it. I have an EOS m100, and I like the size for travel (I do a bunch of business travel), and I HATE the lens options. Slow. Slow. Slow. 11-22, 22 (I have both). Came with the 15-45 so I cover 22 three different times... Stupid. Then there is a macro also overlapping the kit lens, and an 18-55 (another that covers 22), and then the 18-150 (another 22 mm).
@@ericbulington2421 you speak as if they have five different 22mm primes lol. Every lens you mentioned is different from the last, let's not exagerrate. Adapt or go third party, but you're not bound to first party glass alone.
I don't like the assortment of lenses that Canon has supplied. The lens selection has made me decide to go either the 4/3 or the Sony 6500 route if I wanted a mirrorless or smaller camera.
Bad as the selection available for the new NIKON Z-Cameras...
why no fast lenses! come on canon
WHY DO THEY CALL THEM FAST SHOULDN'T THEY BE CALLED BRIGHT?
@@spaceorbison guess it allows faster shutter speed
there is a 32 mm 1.4 now
@@spaceorbison Because light that focuses at a plane closer to the lens gets there "faster". Get it?
Lite?
2019-2-4 首次阅览
拍得很好，继续加油
I want them all
the mask......?
Canon you suck. No fast, tele, native lenses. I've waited long enough. Switching to Fuji.
They want you to buy a $100 adapter to adapt huge lenses which negates the purpose of a small camera...😪
Go and buy something else. Same with all CSC.
RIP 💀
Could have been a good video if it wasn't for the powder puff presenter...................Creepy
18-55mm : "Are you kidding me?"
Well this aged poorly.