Giggle CEO prepared to take lawsuit to High Court to ensure ‘women have rights’
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ย. 2024
- Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle has won a discrimination case after being banned from the female-only app Giggle for Girls.
Giggle CEO Sall Grover joined Sky News host Andrew Bolt to discuss the ruling.
“Federal court, it cost us $500,000 in legal fees to defend ourselves” Ms Grover told Sky News host Andrew Bolt.
“For the High Court, it will be anywhere between $500 - 800,000.
"If legislators actually did their jobs and ensured that the law protected everybody, they could change this for free in like a week.
“But instead, we will take it to the High Court and, fight to ensure that women have rights.”
Julia Gillard is fully to blame for women losing their sex based rights. This ruling is the destruction of women’s rights.
Yup. Women in power destroy women’s rights. And then women blame men anyway. 😂 🤡
Good luck to Sall Grover in taking the appeal to the High Court ✅👍
Ppl can also donate towards Sall Grover's legal appeal cost by searching for ' Giggle crowd fund ' (donations go directly to Sall's legal counsel).
Sall, what a legend you are for defending Australian values!
Go Sal! We're with you!!!❤❤
Well I identify as a Federal Court Judge don't discriminate against me by my lack of study and knowledge!!!
How did we get here...let's fix this.
4:14 This is the crux of the issue. Let's get gender out of laws.
Who let the judge out of d ward?
What about men’s rights. Professional soccer player was banned for four matches in France for not supporting LGBTQIA’s round.
Yeah where’s the outrage on women trying be men also 😆
Men dont have rights. We only exist to give everyone else rights.
Isn't religious/political freedom a protected right?
I hope he sues.
@@tarnw3301
@@tarnw3301 TRANS WOMAN ARE WOMAN! A WOMAN IS SOMEONE WHO IDENTIFIES AS A WOMAN! #iStandWithRoxanneTickle #LGBTQ #TransWomanAreWoman
I certainly hhope Sall Grover wins and puts a stop to this insane nonsense.
To normalise gender dystopia is in my opinion, the ultimate dystopian disaster. Thank you for continuing this work.
Female is XX Chromosome. Male XY. Finished.
And what about XXY, XXXY, XXXXXY, X0, and XY with androgen insensitivity that produces somebody who looks like just an XX female?
@@RC-qf3mpif they born. Yes born with a extra piece no matter what they do after birth they are still a male. Without being born with the extra piece then a female basic fact
@@RC-qf3mpa woman is a male who identifies as a woman period these terfs hate trans woman! Therss literally no difference
@@RC-qf3mp
Do humans have five toes on each foot? Yes, of course. Everyone knows that.
And yet there are people who have six toed feet. But such abnormalities don't change the basic fact. Apply that to those other chromosomal combinations that you mentioned.
@@RC-qf3mp
Those are exceptions which confirm the rule.
The two sexes are functional in reproduction, and having conditions which make you able to both impregnate someone and become pregnant yourself would you make a hermaphrodite which is not a third sex but just having both the other two.
A condition which prevents you from reproducing altogether doesn't constitute a third sex either.
I'd refer to those people just as people with rare conditions and address them in a way they wish to be address.
Keep fighting you true woman
So far, I haven’t seen one federal politician on either side of government say anything about this issue
please name and shame the judge
Robert Bromwich
@@robynhegwein1 TRANS WOMAN ARE WOMAN! A WOMAN IS SOMEONE WHO IDENTIFIES AS A WOMAN! #iStandWithRoxanneTickle #LGBTQ #TransWomanAreWoman
@@robynhegwein1 roberta??
You’ll get my donation 👍
dont complain about the circus, if you allow the clowns to run the show
By “clowns” you mean “feminists”. 🤡
Well this woman is standing up and fighting so..
What choice do we have, they are all clowns. You vote for what you think are the best of the bunch but at the end of the day they are all still clowns.
Yeah, the operation is called an addadicktomy!
Good one.
Maybe. Just maybe the Judge has previously changed his sex
It seems that if one judge from anywhere, where rules birds can be dogs, it becomes fact.
BTW, the judge's argument were not even a valid argument IF people could change sex, let's say by magically turning a male body into a full-fledged female one or vice versa.
Why?
Because Tickle arguably didn't do that, obviously. I don't know what Tickle already has done to their body in order to feminize it but growing their hair longer and wearing a dress definitely does not count as such.
If Tickle is still capable of impregnating a woman, their sex is 'male' by the very DEFINITION.
Tickle has had surgery. So you would be incorrect. Maybe you should speak on what you know and not what you think
You can put lipstick on a pig but.....
Let's be real, we all know the pig would eat the lipstick :D
Progressives: Sex and Gender are different.
Also Progressives: Sex and Gender are the same.
I have always wondered what his motives were joining the app. There are thousands of other apps he could have joined that would accept him with open arms.
Misogyny. They can't be a woman, so they hate real women and want to 'make them pay'. That's my unprofessional take on it ;)
Who is going to pay the High court fees? Tax payers?
For Mr Tickle's fees? That will almost certainly continue to be the case.
Not so for Ms Grover, who will have to continue to crowdfund in order, hopefully, that the rights of women and girls to female only spaces be reinstated.
"Sex is changeable" is true - in species like clownfish.
The sexes are generally defined by whether
▪︎you produce relatively few large immobile gametes known as eggs (which makes you female) or
▪︎an awful lot off small mobile gametes known as spermatozoes (which makes you male) or
▪︎even both (which makes you a hermaphrodite) like some species do.
In endothermic animals like birds or mammals, including humans, sex is genetically determined and therefore unchangeable. Until we learn to magically turn a male body into a full-fledged female one and vice versa, of course.
Laws are just formal commands, they do not need to be rational or principled, they just have to be written down and signed.
No, if I write down a rule and sign it, that doesn't make it law. It _also_ has to be decreed by an appropriate authority. Australia therefore can't make rules for America, and states can't make laws for federal matters, and national governments can't make laws that contradict God, who made males and females.
💰💰💰💰500,000
Julia Gillard has a lot to answer for this outrageous disaster
It is illegal to ban women from men-only clubs but it is legal to ban men from women-only clubs. Is this Justice or Just us?
Creepy cat in dress earned 3.3k per year over 3 years. That what you call a pyrrhic victory.
You cannotbchange sex ,there are 2 sexes, male &female ,man woman stop the nonsense,
Women should take the time to consider how their movements have done very much the same thing to male safe spaces. Male safe spaces are practically non-existent now.
Tickle is not very funny that is why we need to find a central point of sanity instead of the far right and the far left urinating about for viewing figures. ❤
It’s about time someone took a stand about people judging other people and how they want to live their lives..if people want to change their gender they have every right..that’s why there is treatment for gender reassignment. Some people are just bigots living in the last century..this is the 21st century and people are entitled not to be judged by others trying to hold them to their often questionable standards.
Go away Groomer
if p3nises in the women's change room is 21st century i'm quite proud to be outdated!!
What a disservice parents and people are doing to society..when they are not taught to accept people..for who they are..not what they are…acceptance and tolerance for out way ….discrimination and bigotry..that’s the kind of world I prefer to live in.
LOL
@@ThatGuy-ze5kk TRANS WOMAN ARE WOMAN! A WOMAN IS SOMEONE WHO IDENTIFIES AS A WOMAN! #iStandWithRoxanneTickle #LGBTQ #TransWomanAreWoman
Not that i disagree about sex being genetic, but youre excluding men as if all women are safe for other women and all men are not safe.
Imagine someone trying to have a men only app.
And youre going to the high court with other peoples money. “I will never stop” but “ i dont have spare money to fund it”
Yeah nah
I think the point of the app was for women to talk about issues effecting women and to find room mates to share with. I don't see why men couldn't have their own app for similar reasons. And trans people could create their own app too if they want. Its not saying all men arent safe, but sometimes women might want to talk about issues specific to women. They may not feel comfortable discussing these things in front of men - or trans women who don't have the same experiences as biological women.
@@krissyk9767 best definition of a woman, ive ever heard, was “your mother” simple and 100% irrefutable accuracy
@@davefoord1259
"best definition of a woman, ive ever heard, was “your mother” "
The problem is that that's an _example,_ not a _definition._
@@PJRayment fair enough
What is not said, is that Roxanne Tickle's case WAS funded by the taxpayer !
The fact we even have to discuss or debate womens rights is a sad reflection on all involved that support the delusions of some at the detriment of others. No commonsense. 😮
Not a world I want to live in anymore. ❤️🇦🇺🦘