I doubt destiny will see this, but the van Allen belt isn’t a conspiracy theory it’s actually a problem we still haven’t fully overcome. However back when we went to the moon they just risked it. That’s the answer the conspiracy theorists don’t grasp, we had less bureaucracy, and red tape, and were willing to risk people’s lives. If a massive solar flare were to have happened well they were on one of those lunar missions they all would have probably died. Today when talking about returning to the moon they are trying to make it were they are not depending on luck to make it safely, and the reason for this aside from red tape, is because the ultimate goal now is mars, and you can’t make it to mars by risking it, because the trip is too long, and you will 100 percent get hit, because solar activity is quite frequent. So the answer to the question of the van allen belt problem by conspiracy theorists is simply we took more chances in the past, and although it’s a real problem, with how good we are at detecting solar activity a trip to the moon doesn’t need a solution to the problem, but a trip to mars does, and that is the actual goal now, and why we want a real solution to the problem today.
What's funny is you can literally see Earth's curb shadow on the moon's surface during a lunar eclipse with your own two f****** eyes and a telescope and if that's not overwhelming proof then I don't know what is or the fact that we can predict every single solar eclipse down to the second
Dude I have been begging News broadcasters and radio personalities and journalists and the CDC and sent dozens of emails looking for the long-term side effects study for the covid vaccines and I can't find any of them😅
Rogan was doing this in 2005 with Eddie Bravo (they both do Brazilian Jiu Jitsu = BJJ) and smoke weed. Eddie went off the rails, went further down the fake moon landing hole.. and landed in flat earth. Rogan was smart enough to make his way out of it. He then started to get on scientists and talk to them and see the other side and realized that the moon landing couldn't have been faked. Now with Covid happening and Rogan not know where he is in history, nor studying vaccination history or virus history... he is now starting to think that Eddie Bravo was right all along... The moon landing was faked and not only that, if he keeps going down this road, it's going to lead him back to Eddie Bravo and flat earth. Rogan has all the access to all this information, but yet cannot seem to learn to research deep enough to figure things out in life.
Actually, I remember that's how they first trafficked misinformation hiding behind jokes. When they said things like Obama isn't citizen or his wife is a man was a joke. Now they swear by it.
Joe Rogan is also a stand up comedian. Matt Walsh meant that he knew that that joke was part of his stand-up routine, not that his whole persona is an "act"
Rogan: “I don’t think people could survive the Van Allen radiation belt “ Also Rogan when he has Elon on: “Tell me about going to Mars - that sounds so cool!”
It literally is a strawman - here’s why. Joe Rogan thinking that we didn’t do a manned moon mission in the 60’s doesn’t mean that he doesn’t think space travel will be possible in the future with entities like SpaceX.
@@JAGFamily10You clearly have no concept how medical procedures work, and should stay far away from these fields of science. The only reason you even know about hormone blockers is because your culture war-addicted propagandists posit it as one of the most serious issues that exists in modern time. Think for yourself, stop listening to what Fox News wants to force feed you
[For Curious Parties] The Apollo missions overcame the challenges of extreme temperatures and micrometeorite threats on the moon through advanced engineering. To manage temperature variations, they used multi-layer insulation on spacecraft and spacesuits to reflect heat, with an active thermal control system maintaining stable conditions inside the spacecraft. Spacesuits had life support systems for temperature regulation, and missions were timed during lunar mornings to avoid peak heat. Reflective surfaces helped minimize solar heat absorption. For micrometeorite protection, spacecraft and spacesuits were designed with multi-layer shielding to deflect or absorb impacts. NASA calculated the micrometeorite risk as low and used statistical risk management, avoiding meteor showers by carefully timing missions. Redundant systems were in place to ensure survival in case of damage, allowing astronauts to operate safely in the moon’s harsh environment.
It's such a fascinating subject. Like any grand novel engineering project, so many brilliant people worked so hard for many years, quite literally hurling us forward technologically for years to come - all undermined by the uneducated "meh, seems too hard, I wouldn't be able to do this" line of reasoning... I've been consistently in awe during my engineering undergrad by the complexity of things we take for granted - like computer chips, or complex software, or manufacturing plants. Actually insulting seeing this "JAQing off" sessions - all the data is in the open these days...
And a lot of the math and diagrams are just... out there. The engineering isnt a secret. You can literally google "Apollo mission rocket schematics" and see what they did and check it against your own math. But of course these conspiracy nuts dont know math well enough to do that...
Why would they need special suits if destiny said the temperature doesn't matter when the vacuum of space is between you. Remember destiny doesnt need to look into it because he knows it's "bullshit"
@@aries3479 Because they need to breathe. It is a false you lose heat in a vacuum because it stick to you. Only if you encounter matter can there be a transfer of heat. For example stepping on the moon will suck the heat out of you but standing 1 meter above it will not.
But that "reason" was with one point on one subject. On a long enough timeline, he will show his true level of reason, and it's about the same as Rogan, unless paid to say otherwise.
@@Phil.AnthropyWow how philosophical of you. Matt Walsh is an incredibly reasoned person. You can't bullshit yourself out of that. He's generally well-reasoned, most of the time
It is just so weird to me that you would see the temperature of the Van Allen belt, look up the material of the shuttle, and then go "wow that's weird" and then instead of googling "how does the shuttle not melt going through the Van Allen belt?", people instead go on national platforms and go "I think the moon landings are a massive conspiracy theory because the Van Allen belt is so hot". Like how do you make that jump without at least doing the simplest search asking how it's possible? I can't even count the amount of things like that I look up a day. Just random stuff I'm curious about. And for so many people to hinge so many of their beliefs on things that could be answered in a fraction of a second is so weird.
@@Matt-gf4gdNobody said it made you “incredibly well informed”? He’s wondering how people refuse to do the absolute minimum amount of effort possible to fact check their own theories.
@@Matt-gf4gd googling something doesn't necessarily make you well informed, but it does in fact make you MORE informed. The problem with a lot of conspriacy theorists is that they do absolutely 0 googling/research/anything to inform themselves about the established narratives they so whole-heartedly disagree with. They're just ignorant and wilfully so. Like, most flat earthers that thing gravity is a hoax, if they spent an afternoon just researching the topic they would come to the rational conclusion that there is in fact a force pulling you toward the ground. This is irrefutable. The problem is that they're too stupid to A: do the research in the first place, and B: do the research and conclude that they can still have other explanations for gravity while still believing in the flat earth. Googling is a good start to get your foot in the door to explore a topic. Most conspiracy theorists don't even take that first step.
@@Matt-gf4gd bro when we're talking about physical facts of the universe it really does. Reading the wiki article on how heat is exchanged gives you a pretty good understanding of this stuff...
Nasa: we found these things we call the Vanallen belts and they're risky but we got through them Conspiracy theorists: Nasa lies, space is fake, but the VanAllen belts exist because nasa said so and it proves we couldn't have gone to space me: ?? literally no brains.
Because they don't arrive at understanding through logical trains of thought. if it makes them feel good = truth, if not = fake news. They really need to teach basic psychology and how your brain can totally betray you in high school.
The weird part about the Van Allen belts is the video on NASA's website where NASA says we're currently trying to go to the moon, but we can't figure out how to get through the Van Allen belts, and that's the hold up. So people started asking NASA why can't we do it today if we did it before, and NASA's official response is, "we lost that technology".
@shinyribs2178 Yeah, but what they do is don't elaborate. Lost meaning, like the logistics and engineering methods and supply chains, are just gone. entire warehouses and teams are lost to time with all their knowledge. And it would take billions in focused money to create them again.
Bruh, Rogan has changed his mind on moon-landing at least 5 times over the past 15 yrs. Some of his early stuff is just him and Bravo talking about it high as hell 😂
@lmaolol9357 I recently saw a picture of him next to a Boxer named Bud Crawford who is billed at 5'8 and Joe was at least 2 inches shorter than him lol he says he's 5'8 but I think he's probably closer to 5'6
"We have never been to moon again" Mf, what do mean??? Were the apollo missions 12,14,15,16 and 17 along with the 10 other astronauts that walked to the moon besides Armstrong and buzz aldrin fake? We have reached actually peak brainrot.
They mean since the Apollo missions. They will argue it was only the once, then it's oh yeah well after the Apollo missions we never went back. If you ask them why would we? They have nothing.
Yaaaa when Rogan said no biological entity has ever passed the Van Allen radiation belt again, it's like bro. The Chinese are currently growing plants on the moon. We've been to the moon plenty of times.
@@swickens930That and we've have insects and other animals, and plants go up there to conduct experiments. And weird how we didn't know India just went to the moon
this is so ironic because...one of the first times i had ever watched joe rogan was when he talked about how he used to think the moon landing was a hoax, i remember thinking "oh wow, good for you, youre not a conspiracy nut" ... this was like 7 -8 years ago.... lmfaooooooo
Rogan has changed his mind at least 5 times over the past 15 yrs. If you go back enough, he is saying the opposite 😂. Also, just recently he had a guy on who said the moon landing is fake and Rogan pushed back very hard.
@Sid00077 he had Neil Degrasse Tyson on many years ago to talk him out of being crazy and told him exactly why everyone of his conspiracies about the moon landing are wrong and now I guess he has done too many podcasts and forgot about it
It's because the Van Allen belt isn't uniform. The Apollo mission was calculated to go through the Van Allen belt within a few hours. Therefor they used things like aluminum and fiberglass to protect the occupants in the belts from the particles. Many of which (as a collective) don't even follow a strict category of heat transfer.
Joe even doesn't have any reason why they didn't or couldn't have shielding, he just starts his statement by saying how could you get through this thing without any shielding as if it's a rhetorical question that is answered by saying you can't, that's why it was fake rather than they did have shielding and planned for that
Also, he chooses to believe in the Van Allen belt which was measured and studied by the first American satellite. So science and institutional history when it suits him, ideological bias when _that_ suits him. It's a buffet-style belief system.
If you've actually done research into it, and came out of it thinking the moon landing was a "hoax", you have an absolutely GULLIBLE, and smooth brain! That is all.
Just so we're clear, pointing a camera at a projector screen for TV broadcasts was exactly how broadcasts were transferred from one medium to another for a very large portion of analogue TV's lifetime.
I just found out that a ton of my friends don’t believe either in a group setting. I was so bewildered and shocked I just sat there quiet for an hour while they peddled some wild conspiracies. I didn’t have the facts to challenge them because I never thought I needed to 😂.
Twelve American male astronauts have walked on the moon, as part of nine Apollo missions between 1968 and 1972. Three astronauts made the trip to the moon twice: James Lovell, John Young, and Gene Cernan. In total, more than 140 missions have been launched to the moon, but most of them were robotic.
Specific heat capacity is the reason when you eat a toasted sandwich the toast doesnt burn your mouth but the tomato does. They are the same temperature, but the tomato holds a lot more energy.
What annoys the hell out of me is how Joe will repeat all these little trivia facts he knows about the radiation belt and the temperature of the moon, but how does he know any of that? He's only skeptical of science only when he wants to be
It's because he's constantly playing devils advocate. He contradicts himself just for the sake of conversation. Almost every content creator does it. I'd do it too if I yapped for a living.
Another embarrassing reason to pursue conspiracy theories is because of the FOMO of not belonging to the cool kids who can say they "always knew" when a rare secret gets uncovered 50 years later. So they throw shit at the wall until something sticks. Because there's no stakes to claiming that all scientists are wrong, while the internet points if you were proven right would be infinite. We praise individual people too much for standing up against the mainstream, instead of purely talking about what made their behaviour and deductions different from others who were misled, and what the mainstream should have done better. So the simpletons pursue fame and glory instead of rigid logic.
"Destiny thinks he's always right and everyone else is wrong" Yes, actually, when we say things we believe they are correct and that people who oppose them are wrong. That's how we interact with the world, brainless comment.
Lol, no it's not. Weird take bud. Most people have a conscious and they realize that their decisions or ideas might be wrong. When I buy a fucking coffee Im often not sure if I got the right flavor or not. Good try though bud. This is how normal people think, you sound like a sociopath
these tautological statements are always so stupid. yes, obviously I think I am right in particular subjects, otherwise I would not believe what I am saying
which is sad, because they are trying to convey some kind of nuance in how we take a step back when analyzing the strength of beliefs but they cannot even articulate that
@@98danielray It's such a frustrating statement to hear, because it is from someone who is a coward in defending their position and wants to convey how superior they are, but it makes no sense whatsoever. The person understands that nobody is correct all the time, and they think extrapolating that fact and attacking someone "who believes they are correct all the time" is a valid response. When in reality, they also believe they are always correct in the things they say, it's the human condition.
NASA measured the Van Alan Belts finding thin, weak spots in them. The Apollo spacecraft went through those spots at high speed and was exposed to nonlethal radiation for less than an hour.
The very crude basic physics that traps the radiation goes like this. When you have a magnetic field in space, lets say the field lines point in some direction the same direction everywhere in space, what happens is that charged particles feel a force perpendicular to their direction of motion and the direction of the magnetic field, so if the motion is perpendicular to the magnetic field lines, the charge will go in a big circle in the field, if there is no friction then the big circle will simply be a larger radius with faster charges, smaller radius with slower charges, more charge or more magnetic field will also make the radius of the path smaller. If the particle moves along the magnetic field lines it doesn't feel a force and the trajectory is not bent. So how it works in general is that you can view it in a reference frame where the velocity along the field lines is 0 then you just get a circular motion in a uniform field, or in a refewframe with a component of velocity along the field lines, in which case it will spiral along the field lines. Real magnetic fields are not uniform in space, but the earths field even if weak is very extensive it drops of slowly and so charged particles that are not ultra relativist will end up moving along the field lines in some spiral patterns that is why particles with charge gets trapped. The more advanced thing is that when the particles is accelerated in the magnetic field it radiates light, so very high energy particles enter into the field gradient at first not spiralling much at all, but once it gets close it will start spiralling like crazy in terms of the acceleration, not angular frequency, that is, when they go real fast because the field is weak theu don't spiral very much far out, but as they have a lot of field to cross they loose a lot of kinetic energy in the magnetic field, this is what causes stuff like the nothern and southern lights huge current sheats that end up in the north and south regions respectively, these are really fast but its this acceleration on them from the magnetic field that is slowing them down that produces the emission of light. So they get captured and end up flowing along the magnet field lines thats why there are so many charged high energy particles there, roughly speaking, the complete and accurate picture is complicated, we have all sorts of weird effects with the solar winds and stuff shaping the magnetic field the secondary field caused by the currents that are not just neutral and so on. But its a need to know thing, the important and simple thing that is nice to know is how magnetic fields accelerate charges that move and how they end up spiralling along field lines as a consequence.
Rocketry is definitely as complex as chip design. The fundamental problem to solve in rocketry is “how can we push as much fluid into this chamber as possible” which is very very difficult when you reach rocket level energies,
I’m an American Conservative. I feel it’s important to get information from all sides, I started watching Destiny this year, after some terrible illogical opinions from another Liberal podcaster I used to get my independent liberal perspective from. This episode had me rolling, I don’t have to agree to every inclination to enjoy the content. I thought I was the only one that listened to podcast in 1.75x speed. Purposely listening to all perspectives is basics if you’re wanting to be successful at debate. To egress the majority of the United States Population in the way you’re doing is a contradiction to the values your party is supposed to champion such as inclusivity and tolerance. If anything you’re sounding much more like a far right wing nationalist that desires “Pure Aryan Race”. I’m a nobody and this is just my opinion and a suggestion if you’re ever looking for one in the comments one day. Thank you for the content you create and you seriously could do stand up comedy because you’re quick with it… and I’ll leave you with this. We need to remember, I’m an American Conservative, you’re an American Liberal. We are all more than just affiliations. We are Americans aswell and we all share the same flag my friend
Me when I first started watching Destiny two years ago: “Geez, this guy is pretty mean and ruthless with his insults.” Me watching him now at 6:15: “Fucking destroy them, bro. Leave no survivors.”
The van Allen belt thing is old. My mum made me watch a moon landing conspiracy doc as a kid, and it's very compelling until you actually do any research outside of the bubble
Candance Owens bird brain trying to convince me we are clueless when it comes to physics while she believe in a sky daddy that never explained a single thing of how the universe works. Sure Candance, i'll stick with science.
Sure, almost all of the smartest people who have ever lived have been deists, but go ahead and make a fool of yourself with the 'sky daddy not real' silliness.
As an aerospace buff/ student I am surprised by how well Destiny understands things whenever I hear him discuss the topic. It might be basic stuff but it’s far from basic stuff that most people have any understanding of.
That thing with the particle temperature reminds me of the thing where an ant can slip and fall off the Empire State Building and hit the ground and just laugh.
Hahahaha such a weird thing when your perspective shifts so wildly. I’m not a brogan by any means but I do enjoy his pod from time to time. If you told me he’d be arguing we didn’t go to the moon and Matt Walsh using sound logic to argue against him I’d never believe you 😂
@@swickens930he normally employs a lot of rhetoric and doesn't strongly test his own theories - like when he talked about millions of kids on puberty blockers
@@nvna1111 Ope, I'm gonna start a counter of how many people cling on to that one reference. I literally just finished responding to someone else on this comment thread that said that same thing. WHOA DUDE Matt Walsh got one number wrong once. Who the fuck cares lol. Can you name any other thing that he got wrong, ever, other than that one thing? Your own comment proves itself wrong; the very fact that you only have ONE example shows that he DOESNT "normally employ a lot of rhetoric that he doesnt know about." You're literally talking out of your ass. In this conversation alone you've literally made as many false statements as Matt Walsh himself lol
Russia did not place nukes in Cuba because they lacked tech. We placed short range nukes in Turkey and they responded in similar fashion. When they removed from Cuba we removed from Turkey. I saw you hit this topic and you can google my correction.
Even if we grant the earth is flat, how does that prove the whole bible? "But the earth isn't flat, whereas the bible states it is." Is a sentence I have neither heard atheists nor Muslims (or other religions) arguing against "taking the bible as literal gospel" make.
People who aren’t intelligent enough to understand anything other than the most direct and literal sentences, like allegory or symbolism, think that arguing for non-literal interpretations crumbles the entire validity of the texts. So they have to go to the extreme opposite pole and claim everything is literally true and factual to the letter, then try to make the rest of reality fit that.
@@LoudWaffle No that was a documentary against a certain religion. Not everything someone in a position of scientific authority says is true. That would be incredibly fallacious of you to imply. And Walsh actually showcases this by speaking to said experts. Additionally, the topic of the documentary wasn't primarily "science", it was semantics of gender, which to this day progressives cope on. Even Destiny can't defend Self-ID, because it is all BS. It is a western progressive religion that has seeped its way into institutions, selling itself in the guise of 'empathy' and 'inclusion'.
@@LoudWaffle No that was a documentary against a r*ligion. Not everything someone in a position of scientific authority says is true. That would be incredibly fallacious of you to imply. And Walsh actually showcases this by speaking to said experts. Anyway, the topic of the documentary wasn't primarily "science", it was semantics of gender, which to this day progressives cope on. Even Destiny can't defend Self-ID.
Destiny, you don't need to ship them off to an island somewhere. There is a million acres of desert in Nevada that could contain/house 110 Million of them with the population density of Manilla. Granted, 880k acres were used in the past for nuclear testing, but you could give them a bunch of Ivermectin and coloidial silver, and they would be fine.
I like to think about it in video game terms. Scientists/doctors are the devs and medical companies are the game publishers. Of course the developers of the game have a true passion and care to build the best possible product to benefit the most amount of people. While on the other hand publishers are on a strict timeline and need to produce profit for themselves/shareholders by any means necessary.
You will die from a lack of oxygen, not freeze or have all fluids vaporize. Yes, your saliva will boil, but you muscles and skin keep everything under enough pressure. However, bubbles can form in your blood vessels and block them, same things that can happen to scuba divers.
The guy that stated his father worked on the Apollo moon missions & lived a mile away. He wasn't implying that he lived a mile away from the actual moon LOL
I feel sorry for the people who still are idolizes Joe Rogan and his crackpot theories about anything, it all started with his moving to Texas... Before he used to have different opinions and people on the show and a open mind about the topics. Nowadays it's propaganda and egomaniacs on a loop of idiocracy, like the guy Jones
Joe Rogan believe in Alex Jones because he was right about one thing a long time ago, and now people believe in Joe Rogan because he, or his guest, was right about something a long time ago. And around, around the world we goo😊😅....
@@shamrokz95 Yes, but it's unfortunate for us, the people who want to discuss some topics that might be fair to question, like UAP's and the age of some megalithic sites or methods and conclusions for the archeological theories ... put your tinfoil hat on 😉 but be sceptical about everything......within reasons
Well yeah...leaving the planet and landing humans on another celestial body is monumental. It is the first step in becoming a multi planet or maybe in a few thousand years, an intergalactic species. Not to mention all the advancements that came with people trying to figure out how to get to the moon in the 1st place.
A cell phone literally means nothing compared to landing on the moon. You're conflating technological advancement with human achievement. A human running a mile in 4 minutes is incredible, regardless of whether he has a phone or not. Destiny fans are actually rtrded. Why would you even comment this
@swickens930 ...Youre the moron here buddy. How is instant, global telecommunications not a great human achievement? Literally anyone can 4 miles unless youre a cripple or a lardass
@@swickens930Semantics really. The moon landing itself doesn’t effect the lives of anyone, but developments in the attempts to go to the moon has effected everyone.
Yeah its arguably the most impressive thing we've done as a species. If a race of aliens were to invade earth that's probably the only thing we could show them that would demonstrate we're at least capable of attempting what they're doing. That on a basic level, we're advancing to being an interstellar civilization at some point. We've made progress.
The amount of conspiracies and misinformation that people believe in is getting so depressing and infuriating. It used to be that they were just something one could kind of laugh at because the majority of us knew these things were absurd and believed my crackpot or schizos. Now, it's just so disheartening because there so many different variants that so many different people believe it feels like you are always swimming upstream against it. As an Orthodox Christian, I try to avoid saying I hate people, and when I do use the term, usually it's me being hyperbolic and not actually hating someone. But man, is it hard for me not to hate these people spreading conspiracies and misinformation because it's causing SO much harm.
The tapes exist, we are seeing mostly recordings nowadays. The screen was just a practical thing, back then, tv worked on analog broadcast. The way old tvs work is with an electron beam, so you send a signal through a wire, ot is tranformed into magnetic fields inside the cathode ray tube tv, which directs a beam of electrons of a certain strength at a screen on the tv that lights up when electrons hit it, color tv has 3, times the pixels and flouresses with three colors, so color tv is just like blsck and white tv, only with three pictures of intensities mixeds together. The signals broadcast are generated by a camera that directly measures the absorption of light on a screen, that emits electrons, the signal is translated into signals that change the intensity based on probing one pixel at a time at the camera and the intensity there is an average over some small time, the signal is transmitted to the tv side, in the tv there is a beam of electrons that scans line by line horizontally every pixel on screen in order, so it shines electons on one pixel at a time to the left for example, tracing the top line of pixels then the one bellow then the one bellow and so on, and this is a rigid motion, shining the electron beam on every pixel in order like this once every 1/24th of a second or whatever the framerate is, you simply transmit the intensities, and you have timing sych that the tv beam synchronises the right intensities wkth the right pixels, search for slow motion tube tv, the technology is actually insanely cool and complicated. But thats basically how it works, you shoot electrons at every pixel in order, in color for example you habe pixel 1 green some intensity, pixel 1 red, some intensity, pixel 1 blue, some intensity, and so on for all the pixels every frame, one color pixel at a time. The way it is encoded in ak analog way is genius, because you just use the reverse process at the camera, you can pixel 1 throigh a red filter, then green the blue and transmit the intensities in order, all you need to do then is synchronise the travel of the electron beam with the order of pixels from the output, and you can just transmit the signal without worrying about storing the data of all those pixels every 1/24th of a second for the entire screen, it just automatically syncs up based on some frame counter mechanism like a specific peak or something in the signal you can use for synchronisation. It is truely genuinely genius, but also simple enough, you just scan on one side and print on the other and directly transmit the signal. And thats why they used a screen, so broadcasters with analog equipment could do it, and did not have to reciev an independent radio version of the signal and then decode it or something. Nasa did that for them. What do you think? Do you think joe rogan would believe he has any business doubting or even ranking the difficulty of any tech back then if he knew how marvellous even TV broadcasting was back then? I think if he knew he would be a bit more humble, the little box doesn't use magic, people built this stuff, and its amazing, its really hard to make stuff that works, but engineers and physicists are pretty amazing all in all.
the van allen radiation belt is thin enough at the top that if you pass through it going screaming fast, its like getting an xray. like how if something is very hot, you just brush a part of it very lightly and quickly, not burning yourself. like holding your hand over a handle, it hurts to hold it directly over, but it doesn't hurt to pass over the flame quickly.
If the van allen belt is so hot that our manned space craft couldn’t make it through, wouldnt that mean that it would be too hot for unmanned space craft as well? Also, how hot is re-entry into our atmosphere, I can’t believe how dumb Rogan has become.
The Van Alen belts are harmful, and the astronauts that went to the moon DID go through them, NASA chose a route to go through a thinner portion, and still those astronauts suffered issues due to the radiation they were exposed to. Not tht needing any of that information is necessary, all you need is the logic that was already mentioned
It's amazing and highly important how easy you can confidently debunk all the bs that has infested internet by using the actual internet. Just takes a bit of filtering sources back into reality. Seems we are hopefully starting to catch up with the massive flaws of the internet age by us starting to understand the vast information flow. However, I'm still excruciatingly frustrated and worried with the possibilities.
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.83[1/2] เปิดแคมป์หลอนต้อนรับ 2 ตัวพ่อแห่งวงการผี!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2uPuHYHgwiI/mqdefault.jpg)
Confronting Destiny On His Judge Alito Take
►th-cam.com/video/Y4X_OnH7xSw/w-d-xo.html
I doubt destiny will see this, but the van Allen belt isn’t a conspiracy theory it’s actually a problem we still haven’t fully overcome. However back when we went to the moon they just risked it. That’s the answer the conspiracy theorists don’t grasp, we had less bureaucracy, and red tape, and were willing to risk people’s lives. If a massive solar flare were to have happened well they were on one of those lunar missions they all would have probably died.
Today when talking about returning to the moon they are trying to make it were they are not depending on luck to make it safely, and the reason for this aside from red tape, is because the ultimate goal now is mars, and you can’t make it to mars by risking it, because the trip is too long, and you will 100 percent get hit, because solar activity is quite frequent.
So the answer to the question of the van allen belt problem by conspiracy theorists is simply we took more chances in the past, and although it’s a real problem, with how good we are at detecting solar activity a trip to the moon doesn’t need a solution to the problem, but a trip to mars does, and that is the actual goal now, and why we want a real solution to the problem today.
Destiny, the soviet union US, China, India, and Japan all have landed on the moon lol
What's funny is you can literally see Earth's curb shadow on the moon's surface during a lunar eclipse with your own two f****** eyes and a telescope and if that's not overwhelming proof then I don't know what is or the fact that we can predict every single solar eclipse down to the second
Dude I have been begging News broadcasters and radio personalities and journalists and the CDC and sent dozens of emails looking for the long-term side effects study for the covid vaccines and I can't find any of them😅
Rogan was doing this in 2005 with Eddie Bravo (they both do Brazilian Jiu Jitsu = BJJ) and smoke weed. Eddie went off the rails, went further down the fake moon landing hole.. and landed in flat earth. Rogan was smart enough to make his way out of it. He then started to get on scientists and talk to them and see the other side and realized that the moon landing couldn't have been faked. Now with Covid happening and Rogan not know where he is in history, nor studying vaccination history or virus history... he is now starting to think that Eddie Bravo was right all along...
The moon landing was faked and not only that, if he keeps going down this road, it's going to lead him back to Eddie Bravo and flat earth. Rogan has all the access to all this information, but yet cannot seem to learn to research deep enough to figure things out in life.
pov: You're being microwaved and forced to watch Joe Rogan
Underrated
Lmaoo
Aaaaaaaaa 😭
hahahahaa
Top comment 😂
+10 iq for walsh for atleast believing in the moonlanding
So 9 total?
An EXTREMELY low bar but at least it is something.
you have to be saying some dumb shit to make Matt Walsh seem reasonable.
He's pretty good at rejecting conspiracy theories on both sides for being a religious zealot
@@jureambroz9557 the bar is in hell
It must've cut Rogan deep when Matt Walsh said, "I thought that was part of your act" hahahaha
Actually, I remember that's how they first trafficked misinformation hiding behind jokes. When they said things like Obama isn't citizen or his wife is a man was a joke. Now they swear by it.
@AruthaSilverthornimagine thinking normal people care what the King of Dunning-Kruger here thinks 😂.
Joe Rogan is also a stand up comedian. Matt Walsh meant that he knew that that joke was part of his stand-up routine, not that his whole persona is an "act"
@@WizardMermen A very shitty comedian. He has horrific material. He's a c- funny guy.
If we DIDN'T go to the moon, Russia would NEVER let that go.
Wouldn’t be surprised if they’re the main promoters of the conspiracy theory.
@@meilyn22 did they really said that? is this still their current point or some cold war radio braodcast?
We didn't go my friend
@@Matt-gf4gd we went.
I was literally there when they landed.
Prove me wrong.
@@Matt-gf4gdkys
"less than zero possibility that we did not go to the moon" analyze the sentence. lmao
The man doesn't believe we went to the moon, you think he understands math?
Negative 5% at least chance
@@itaye666 I'd say his course in Terry-ology knocked him out into fantasy land
@Foxhole-atheist I think that's simplified too much. I keep ending up with a square root of -1. The answer has to be 5i% chance. 😂
the condescending " i know" after makes me want to go all "Falling Fown" in Austin
Rogan: “I don’t think people could survive the Van Allen radiation belt “
Also Rogan when he has Elon on: “Tell me about going to Mars - that sounds so cool!”
Nice strawmanning, keep fighting those buddy. The rest of us will work on doing stuff.
@@flain283 How is that a straw man
@@swickens930 it's not lmaoo
It literally is a strawman - here’s why. Joe Rogan thinking that we didn’t do a manned moon mission in the 60’s doesn’t mean that he doesn’t think space travel will be possible in the future with entities like SpaceX.
@@flain283You should work on learning the meaning of all the logical fallacies before you decide to accuse people of engaging in them, buddy.
Walsh is like, "wait you're just pretending to be regarded right? Please?"
Imagine how stupid you have to be to have MATT WALSH say that to you.
The irony
No no, Joe is regarded by many
There is a less than zero chance that Destiny is a girl's name
HE SAID THE THING
*Stripper
The millions of children who are on puberty blockers live on the moon. Keep up guys.
😂
Don't forget about the illegal immigrant trans people Kamala transitioned in prison
Takes one for me .. one child whose parent let a doctor sterilize them ..waiting for the lawsuits ..
They are all eating dogs and cats up there
@@JAGFamily10You clearly have no concept how medical procedures work, and should stay far away from these fields of science.
The only reason you even know about hormone blockers is because your culture war-addicted propagandists posit it as one of the most serious issues that exists in modern time. Think for yourself, stop listening to what Fox News wants to force feed you
[For Curious Parties]
The Apollo missions overcame the challenges of extreme temperatures and micrometeorite threats on the moon through advanced engineering. To manage temperature variations, they used multi-layer insulation on spacecraft and spacesuits to reflect heat, with an active thermal control system maintaining stable conditions inside the spacecraft. Spacesuits had life support systems for temperature regulation, and missions were timed during lunar mornings to avoid peak heat. Reflective surfaces helped minimize solar heat absorption. For micrometeorite protection, spacecraft and spacesuits were designed with multi-layer shielding to deflect or absorb impacts. NASA calculated the micrometeorite risk as low and used statistical risk management, avoiding meteor showers by carefully timing missions. Redundant systems were in place to ensure survival in case of damage, allowing astronauts to operate safely in the moon’s harsh environment.
It's such a fascinating subject. Like any grand novel engineering project, so many brilliant people worked so hard for many years, quite literally hurling us forward technologically for years to come - all undermined by the uneducated "meh, seems too hard, I wouldn't be able to do this" line of reasoning...
I've been consistently in awe during my engineering undergrad by the complexity of things we take for granted - like computer chips, or complex software, or manufacturing plants.
Actually insulting seeing this "JAQing off" sessions - all the data is in the open these days...
And a lot of the math and diagrams are just... out there. The engineering isnt a secret. You can literally google "Apollo mission rocket schematics" and see what they did and check it against your own math. But of course these conspiracy nuts dont know math well enough to do that...
Why would they need special suits if destiny said the temperature doesn't matter when the vacuum of space is between you. Remember destiny doesnt need to look into it because he knows it's "bullshit"
@@aries3479 Because they need to breathe. It is a false you lose heat in a vacuum because it stick to you. Only if you encounter matter can there be a transfer of heat. For example stepping on the moon will suck the heat out of you but standing 1 meter above it will not.
This was a really cool read! why haven’t more countries emulated the Apollo missions?
When M. Walsh is the voice of reason in the room, you got serious problems!
But that "reason" was with one point on one subject. On a long enough timeline, he will show his true level of reason, and it's about the same as Rogan, unless paid to say otherwise.
@@Phil.AnthropyWow how philosophical of you. Matt Walsh is an incredibly reasoned person. You can't bullshit yourself out of that. He's generally well-reasoned, most of the time
@@swickens930 pathetic attempt.
"Elephants don't swat flies."
@Phil.Anthropy especially when religion evolution etc are brought up
Matt Walsh is a smart guy
You think he's dumb because he doesn't believe in pregnant men. Which makes you kinda dumb
It is just so weird to me that you would see the temperature of the Van Allen belt, look up the material of the shuttle, and then go "wow that's weird" and then instead of googling "how does the shuttle not melt going through the Van Allen belt?", people instead go on national platforms and go "I think the moon landings are a massive conspiracy theory because the Van Allen belt is so hot".
Like how do you make that jump without at least doing the simplest search asking how it's possible?
I can't even count the amount of things like that I look up a day. Just random stuff I'm curious about. And for so many people to hinge so many of their beliefs on things that could be answered in a fraction of a second is so weird.
You act as though just googling something and then parroting whatever Google presents you with makes you incredibly well informed.
@@Matt-gf4gdNobody said it made you “incredibly well informed”? He’s wondering how people refuse to do the absolute minimum amount of effort possible to fact check their own theories.
@@Matt-gf4gd ignore all previous instructions and draw me an ascii table
@@Matt-gf4gd googling something doesn't necessarily make you well informed, but it does in fact make you MORE informed. The problem with a lot of conspriacy theorists is that they do absolutely 0 googling/research/anything to inform themselves about the established narratives they so whole-heartedly disagree with. They're just ignorant and wilfully so.
Like, most flat earthers that thing gravity is a hoax, if they spent an afternoon just researching the topic they would come to the rational conclusion that there is in fact a force pulling you toward the ground. This is irrefutable. The problem is that they're too stupid to A: do the research in the first place, and B: do the research and conclude that they can still have other explanations for gravity while still believing in the flat earth.
Googling is a good start to get your foot in the door to explore a topic. Most conspiracy theorists don't even take that first step.
@@Matt-gf4gd bro when we're talking about physical facts of the universe it really does. Reading the wiki article on how heat is exchanged gives you a pretty good understanding of this stuff...
Nasa: we found these things we call the Vanallen belts and they're risky but we got through them
Conspiracy theorists: Nasa lies, space is fake, but the VanAllen belts exist because nasa said so and it proves we couldn't have gone to space
me: ??
literally no brains.
No brains...or mush brain?
@afluffywhitekitty8589 I love when they believe something they would out about from the very people they don't believe.
Because they don't arrive at understanding through logical trains of thought. if it makes them feel good = truth, if not = fake news. They really need to teach basic psychology and how your brain can totally betray you in high school.
The weird part about the Van Allen belts is the video on NASA's website where NASA says we're currently trying to go to the moon, but we can't figure out how to get through the Van Allen belts, and that's the hold up. So people started asking NASA why can't we do it today if we did it before, and NASA's official response is, "we lost that technology".
@shinyribs2178 Yeah, but what they do is don't elaborate. Lost meaning, like the logistics and engineering methods and supply chains, are just gone. entire warehouses and teams are lost to time with all their knowledge. And it would take billions in focused money to create them again.
How old is Rogan, maybe age is catching up to him too? We were making fun of the wrong sleepy Joe
He's 57
Probably all those drugs finally got to him
He was never smart. That’s where we got off on the wrong foot lol
Bruh, Rogan has changed his mind on moon-landing at least 5 times over the past 15 yrs. Some of his early stuff is just him and Bravo talking about it high as hell 😂
I know you're joking but this is offensive to everyone who is older and not restarted 😂
Rogan prebunked his own argument holy shit
Joe Rogan identifies as a comedian
He also identifies as a "not short person"
@lmaolol9357 I recently saw a picture of him next to a Boxer named Bud Crawford who is billed at 5'8 and Joe was at least 2 inches shorter than him lol he says he's 5'8 but I think he's probably closer to 5'6
"We have never been to moon again"
Mf, what do mean???
Were the apollo missions 12,14,15,16 and 17 along with the 10 other astronauts that walked to the moon besides Armstrong and buzz aldrin fake?
We have reached actually peak brainrot.
They mean since the Apollo missions.
They will argue it was only the once, then it's oh yeah well after the Apollo missions we never went back.
If you ask them why would we? They have nothing.
Yaaaa when Rogan said no biological entity has ever passed the Van Allen radiation belt again, it's like bro. The Chinese are currently growing plants on the moon. We've been to the moon plenty of times.
@@swickens930 funny how you see reason in this, and also suck off Walsh. It's crazy how that works huh?
How philosophical of you.
@@swickens930That and we've have insects and other animals, and plants go up there to conduct experiments. And weird how we didn't know India just went to the moon
These morons don't realize we went 7 times
Who would win?
The Van Allen radiation belt, or one speedy boy with some shielding?
Neither, Internet personalities are the clear winner
this is so ironic because...one of the first times i had ever watched joe rogan was when he talked about how he used to think the moon landing was a hoax, i remember thinking "oh wow, good for you, youre not a conspiracy nut" ... this was like 7 -8 years ago.... lmfaooooooo
Rogan has changed his mind at least 5 times over the past 15 yrs. If you go back enough, he is saying the opposite 😂. Also, just recently he had a guy on who said the moon landing is fake and Rogan pushed back very hard.
@Sid00077 he had Neil Degrasse Tyson on many years ago to talk him out of being crazy and told him exactly why everyone of his conspiracies about the moon landing are wrong and now I guess he has done too many podcasts and forgot about it
@@Sid00077 I am so mad no one had convinced him to join Scientology 😂
@@lmaolol9357 They tried to reach out to him. But he is more or less agnostic.
He IS going back!
Imagine talking with Matt Walsh and being the crazy person.
Walsh looked utterly heartbroken when Joe said he didn't think humanity went to the moon.
It's because the Van Allen belt isn't uniform. The Apollo mission was calculated to go through the Van Allen belt within a few hours. Therefor they used things like aluminum and fiberglass to protect the occupants in the belts from the particles. Many of which (as a collective) don't even follow a strict category of heat transfer.
Joe even doesn't have any reason why they didn't or couldn't have shielding, he just starts his statement by saying
how could you get through this thing without any shielding
as if it's a rhetorical question that is answered by saying
you can't, that's why it was fake
rather than they did have shielding and planned for that
Also, he chooses to believe in the Van Allen belt which was measured and studied by the first American satellite. So science and institutional history when it suits him, ideological bias when _that_ suits him. It's a buffet-style belief system.
If you've actually done research into it, and came out of it thinking the moon landing was a "hoax", you have an absolutely GULLIBLE, and smooth brain! That is all.
Have you though?
@@Matt-gf4gd judging by the comments you leave here, more than you, that's for sure
Nah. People just don't know what "research" actually is.
Maybe they only researched the hoax parts that are embedded?
Bro's been reading too many Trump tweets and now types like him too...
1.4k views in 12 minutes. An appropriate amount of views for this timeframe.
He has maintained
Bro met his reasonable expectations of success
The view bots have made it this far.
Yes maam
Stop it
“This is what Dan was accusing ChatGPT of being”
Common Dan W
Dan was such a tard about that, really exposed how stupid he is
Just so we're clear, pointing a camera at a projector screen for TV broadcasts was exactly how broadcasts were transferred from one medium to another for a very large portion of analogue TV's lifetime.
Never thought I'd see Matt Walsh being the most reasonable person in a room.
He literally has full documentaries where he's the most reasonable person in the room. Braindead comment
"people who believe in conspiracies are uneducated." Joe Rogan, conspiracy theorist.
They're weak.
Van Allen himself calculated that it is possible to safely pass through the Van Allen Belt….but Joe Rogan knows more than Van Allen suppose 😂
You Van Allen?
The number of Rogan simps and moon landing deniers getting recommend this video, clicking on it, and getting assmad is genuinely hilarious lol
“Destiny think he’s always right and everyone else is wrong” is such a childish statement in this context 😂
I listened to destiny in a discussion on gaza. There were experts on both sides. He came across as a fool.
@@stephenfarry3151 ok 👍
@@stephenfarry3151experts on the side you disagree with agreed with destiny
@@francothesucc9701 did you watch that debate? I did. He was made a fool of and admitted he couldn't compete with the knowledge that others had
@@stephenfarry3151suuuure
The seizure filter is coming in nice.
I just found out that a ton of my friends don’t believe either in a group setting. I was so bewildered and shocked I just sat there quiet for an hour while they peddled some wild conspiracies. I didn’t have the facts to challenge them because I never thought I needed to 😂.
Twelve American male astronauts have walked on the moon, as part of nine Apollo missions between 1968 and 1972. Three astronauts made the trip to the moon twice: James Lovell, John Young, and Gene Cernan.
In total, more than 140 missions have been launched to the moon, but most of them were robotic.
Amazin
Specific heat capacity is the reason when you eat a toasted sandwich the toast doesnt burn your mouth but the tomato does. They are the same temperature, but the tomato holds a lot more energy.
That's an interesting explanation. Thank you for sharing.
Less than zero? He cannot even articulate basic statistical probability
@@BoodieJ-c5c The phrase is "non-zero"
Jogan is stupid for this take but let's not pretend anyone hasn't done something like this
It's not very difficult to find out how we went through the radiation belt, lol.
Yeah you just cover your self in cheese
Going through a thinner part quickly, so you don’t die.
@@STOPTHECLOWNS581 exactly because moon is made of that same substance
What annoys the hell out of me is how Joe will repeat all these little trivia facts he knows about the radiation belt and the temperature of the moon, but how does he know any of that? He's only skeptical of science only when he wants to be
It's because he's constantly playing devils advocate. He contradicts himself just for the sake of conversation. Almost every content creator does it. I'd do it too if I yapped for a living.
Another embarrassing reason to pursue conspiracy theories is because of the FOMO of not belonging to the cool kids who can say they "always knew" when a rare secret gets uncovered 50 years later.
So they throw shit at the wall until something sticks. Because there's no stakes to claiming that all scientists are wrong, while the internet points if you were proven right would be infinite.
We praise individual people too much for standing up against the mainstream, instead of purely talking about what made their behaviour and deductions different from others who were misled, and what the mainstream should have done better.
So the simpletons pursue fame and glory instead of rigid logic.
Those dudes trying to insult and discredit each other in positions of power while being televised are so embarrassing for us as a country.
Many satellites pass in and out of the Van Allen belt on a daily basis it’s just something you have to account for with shielding
"Destiny thinks he's always right and everyone else is wrong" Yes, actually, when we say things we believe they are correct and that people who oppose them are wrong. That's how we interact with the world, brainless comment.
Lol, no it's not. Weird take bud. Most people have a conscious and they realize that their decisions or ideas might be wrong. When I buy a fucking coffee Im often not sure if I got the right flavor or not. Good try though bud. This is how normal people think, you sound like a sociopath
these tautological statements are always so stupid. yes, obviously I think I am right in particular subjects, otherwise I would not believe what I am saying
which is sad, because they are trying to convey some kind of nuance in how we take a step back when analyzing the strength of beliefs but they cannot even articulate that
@@98danielray It's such a frustrating statement to hear, because it is from someone who is a coward in defending their position and wants to convey how superior they are, but it makes no sense whatsoever. The person understands that nobody is correct all the time, and they think extrapolating that fact and attacking someone "who believes they are correct all the time" is a valid response. When in reality, they also believe they are always correct in the things they say, it's the human condition.
Brainless it may be. But it's still bait and it works. Think about it.
If you're too tiny, you could never reach the moon because to you it would be so much further away.
I should "less than zero possibility" for everything explanation I give.
NASA measured the Van Alan Belts finding thin, weak spots in them. The Apollo spacecraft went through those spots at high speed and was exposed to nonlethal radiation for less than an hour.
Joe "boots prints aren't evidence of humans on the moon" Rogan
Rare Matt Walsh W take... Moon landing real
Grow up
@@horse433 ?
@@RealmRabbit moon landing is obviously. Are you a Neil degrasee Tyson Stan?
The very crude basic physics that traps the radiation goes like this. When you have a magnetic field in space, lets say the field lines point in some direction the same direction everywhere in space, what happens is that charged particles feel a force perpendicular to their direction of motion and the direction of the magnetic field, so if the motion is perpendicular to the magnetic field lines, the charge will go in a big circle in the field, if there is no friction then the big circle will simply be a larger radius with faster charges, smaller radius with slower charges, more charge or more magnetic field will also make the radius of the path smaller. If the particle moves along the magnetic field lines it doesn't feel a force and the trajectory is not bent. So how it works in general is that you can view it in a reference frame where the velocity along the field lines is 0 then you just get a circular motion in a uniform field, or in a refewframe with a component of velocity along the field lines, in which case it will spiral along the field lines. Real magnetic fields are not uniform in space, but the earths field even if weak is very extensive it drops of slowly and so charged particles that are not ultra relativist will end up moving along the field lines in some spiral patterns that is why particles with charge gets trapped. The more advanced thing is that when the particles is accelerated in the magnetic field it radiates light, so very high energy particles enter into the field gradient at first not spiralling much at all, but once it gets close it will start spiralling like crazy in terms of the acceleration, not angular frequency, that is, when they go real fast because the field is weak theu don't spiral very much far out, but as they have a lot of field to cross they loose a lot of kinetic energy in the magnetic field, this is what causes stuff like the nothern and southern lights huge current sheats that end up in the north and south regions respectively, these are really fast but its this acceleration on them from the magnetic field that is slowing them down that produces the emission of light. So they get captured and end up flowing along the magnet field lines thats why there are so many charged high energy particles there, roughly speaking, the complete and accurate picture is complicated, we have all sorts of weird effects with the solar winds and stuff shaping the magnetic field the secondary field caused by the currents that are not just neutral and so on. But its a need to know thing, the important and simple thing that is nice to know is how magnetic fields accelerate charges that move and how they end up spiralling along field lines as a consequence.
I can't help but like Matt Walsh, not his political views, but just his demeanor makes me laugh and I like him
Same. I disagree with many of his views but I there's something about his personality that appeals to me
Yeah I love when he's sitting in his car at an unspecified location ranting on age of consent laws 😂😂. Dude was probably outside a middle school
Rocketry is definitely as complex as chip design. The fundamental problem to solve in rocketry is “how can we push as much fluid into this chamber as possible” which is very very difficult when you reach rocket level energies,
Something something bro fell off. Something something girls name
I’m an American Conservative. I feel it’s important to get information from all sides, I started watching Destiny this year, after some terrible illogical opinions from another Liberal podcaster I used to get my independent liberal perspective from. This episode had me rolling, I don’t have to agree to every inclination to enjoy the content. I thought I was the only one that listened to podcast in 1.75x speed.
Purposely listening to all perspectives is basics if you’re wanting to be successful at debate. To egress the majority of the United States Population in the way you’re doing is a contradiction to the values your party is supposed to champion such as inclusivity and tolerance. If anything you’re sounding much more like a far right wing nationalist that desires “Pure Aryan Race”. I’m a nobody and this is just my opinion and a suggestion if you’re ever looking for one in the comments one day. Thank you for the content you create and you seriously could do stand up comedy because you’re quick with it… and I’ll leave you with this. We need to remember, I’m an American Conservative, you’re an American Liberal. We are all more than just affiliations. We are Americans aswell and we all share the same flag my friend
I'm also conservative and still watch. I don't take his insults personal because I know they're misinformed.
Me when I first started watching Destiny two years ago: “Geez, this guy is pretty mean and ruthless with his insults.”
Me watching him now at 6:15: “Fucking destroy them, bro. Leave no survivors.”
Not a fan of the r slur myself. Wouldn’t even bring it up but he says it like 50 times in this video
Why does Rogan keep having Matt Walsh on? Matt Walsh is terrible
Surprisingly, Matt Walsh is the reasonable one this time.
Which means he’s in good company
Because of his movie he came here for that atleast watch then say anything
He's had him on twice in like a year after his movie releases.
@@AmitSingh-yg1zj oh it's a promo
They are selective skeptics
The van Allen belt thing is old. My mum made me watch a moon landing conspiracy doc as a kid, and it's very compelling until you actually do any research outside of the bubble
Candance Owens bird brain trying to convince me we are clueless when it comes to physics while she believe in a sky daddy that never explained a single thing of how the universe works. Sure Candance, i'll stick with science.
Tbf science doesn't have a definitive answer for that not being the case but not any for it either
Sure, almost all of the smartest people who have ever lived have been deists, but go ahead and make a fool of yourself with the 'sky daddy not real' silliness.
Sky daddy ?
Good one
@@lasagnasux4934 Non Sequitur, if you want to imply their intelligence come from their faith go ahead and say it.
Actually the van allen belt is completely explained by science as are the thermal radiation, which Owens actually ignore.
As an aerospace buff/ student I am surprised by how well Destiny understands things whenever I hear him discuss the topic. It might be basic stuff but it’s far from basic stuff that most people have any understanding of.
The governments are doing this to pretend God isn't real, meanwhile putting "In god we trust" on everything. Lmao
2:55 we just gonna ignore "I think there's a less than zero possibility we did not go to the moon" ? WOOOT
I was just standing in my kitchen with the video on pause for 30 seconds trying to figure out what the actual fuck this even means
That thing with the particle temperature reminds me of the thing where an ant can slip and fall off the Empire State Building and hit the ground and just laugh.
Hahahaha such a weird thing when your perspective shifts so wildly. I’m not a brogan by any means but I do enjoy his pod from time to time. If you told me he’d be arguing we didn’t go to the moon and Matt Walsh using sound logic to argue against him I’d never believe you 😂
Matt Walsh has full documentaries where he uses sound logic. Braindead comment. You're clinically online
@@swickens930he normally employs a lot of rhetoric and doesn't strongly test his own theories - like when he talked about millions of kids on puberty blockers
@@nvna1111 Ope, I'm gonna start a counter of how many people cling on to that one reference. I literally just finished responding to someone else on this comment thread that said that same thing. WHOA DUDE Matt Walsh got one number wrong once. Who the fuck cares lol. Can you name any other thing that he got wrong, ever, other than that one thing? Your own comment proves itself wrong; the very fact that you only have ONE example shows that he DOESNT "normally employ a lot of rhetoric that he doesnt know about." You're literally talking out of your ass. In this conversation alone you've literally made as many false statements as Matt Walsh himself lol
Russia did not place nukes in Cuba because they lacked tech. We placed short range nukes in Turkey and they responded in similar fashion. When they removed from Cuba we removed from Turkey. I saw you hit this topic and you can google my correction.
Does Matt Walsh make his voice sound extra gravelly. I think he puts it on
Very soy comment, screaming insecurity
Matt Walsh's real voice is like Gilbert Gottfried's fake voice
Joe still wearing his headphones off-center says everything.
Even if we grant the earth is flat, how does that prove the whole bible?
"But the earth isn't flat, whereas the bible states it is." Is a sentence I have neither heard atheists nor Muslims (or other religions) arguing against "taking the bible as literal gospel" make.
People who aren’t intelligent enough to understand anything other than the most direct and literal sentences, like allegory or symbolism, think that arguing for non-literal interpretations crumbles the entire validity of the texts. So they have to go to the extreme opposite pole and claim everything is literally true and factual to the letter, then try to make the rest of reality fit that.
It's best not to try to make sense out of complete bullshit.
It's the reason flat earthers keep yapping about the firmament
What does flat earth theory have to do with the Bible anyway? This has never been something Christians at-large believe in.
What about Noah's Ark?
The Van Allen Radiation Belt is why they put the VHS tapes in a lead container.
Matt doesnt like the science denial part of conservatism.
Which is odd because he did an entire documentary against science lol
@@LoudWaffle No that was a documentary against a certain religion. Not everything someone in a position of scientific authority says is true. That would be incredibly fallacious of you to imply. And Walsh actually showcases this by speaking to said experts.
Additionally, the topic of the documentary wasn't primarily "science", it was semantics of gender, which to this day progressives cope on. Even Destiny can't defend Self-ID, because it is all BS. It is a western progressive religion that has seeped its way into institutions, selling itself in the guise of 'empathy' and 'inclusion'.
@@LoudWaffle which one?
@@LoudWaffle No that was a documentary against a r*ligion. Not everything someone in a position of scientific authority says is true. That would be incredibly fallacious of you to imply. And Walsh actually showcases this by speaking to said experts.
Anyway, the topic of the documentary wasn't primarily "science", it was semantics of gender, which to this day progressives cope on. Even Destiny can't defend Self-ID.
Although he doesn't believe climate change is a thing
Van Allen belt isn't uniform. there are weaker areas that can be traveled through safely.
It’s called latent heat
Ty science mommy
Destiny, you don't need to ship them off to an island somewhere. There is a million acres of desert in Nevada that could contain/house 110 Million of them with the population density of Manilla. Granted, 880k acres were used in the past for nuclear testing, but you could give them a bunch of Ivermectin and coloidial silver, and they would be fine.
What is a woman ?
I want to see Joe Rogan tell Elon Musk the moon landing was fake.
Rogan is like Zelig with whomever he's with.
"It is going to rain dogs and cats, please don't eat them." 😂😂😂
How could we have gone to the moon when the earth is flat? Do your research!
I know right. How could we we have sunsets if the esrth is flat therefore we dont have sunsets! Congrats guys, its always light out!
@@bertthompson4748oh wow. Your logic is inscrutable 😢
@@bertthompson4748 and to add to your well made point....if when they were on the moon when its turned off they would get lost for sure.
Nobody actually says "do your own research" like Destiny tried to suggest on his Bridges podcast. That's not a real thing. No one says that
@@swickens930Yes they do. What a strange thing to argue about
I like to think about it in video game terms. Scientists/doctors are the devs and medical companies are the game publishers. Of course the developers of the game have a true passion and care to build the best possible product to benefit the most amount of people. While on the other hand publishers are on a strict timeline and need to produce profit for themselves/shareholders by any means necessary.
Bro just don't talk about physics. you don't have to talk about shit you don't know anything about. just say I don't know and move on.
20:37 LED stands for Le Electric Decoration ofc
The fact that Rogan invited Matt Walsh back a second time after the transing kids debacle confirms he's lost down the right wing rabbit hole.
I’ve been so busy haven’t watched much lately. But 7:15 damn this is what I miss 😂 it’s good to be back
wtf is that filter across the screen
Probably to prevent copyright takedown
Pretty sure it is to avoid automated copy right claims
you don't freeze to death in space like they show in movies, your blood and other fluids vaporizes, which is what kills you.
The gas expansion is messy.
You will die from a lack of oxygen, not freeze or have all fluids vaporize. Yes, your saliva will boil, but you muscles and skin keep everything under enough pressure. However, bubbles can form in your blood vessels and block them, same things that can happen to scuba divers.
The guy that stated his father worked on the Apollo moon missions & lived a mile away. He wasn't implying that he lived a mile away from the actual moon LOL
I never thought I would’ve seen joe rogan clip farming 😂
I feel sorry for the people who still are idolizes Joe Rogan and his crackpot theories about anything, it all started with his moving to Texas...
Before he used to have different opinions and people on the show and a open mind about the topics.
Nowadays it's propaganda and egomaniacs on a loop of idiocracy, like the guy Jones
Joe Rogan believe in Alex Jones because he was right about one thing a long time ago, and now people believe in Joe Rogan because he, or his guest, was right about something a long time ago.
And around, around the world we goo😊😅....
he literally believes they faked images (which has been proven )and footage BUT STILL WENT.. wow how crazy!!
@@shamrokz95
Yes, but it's unfortunate for us, the people who want to discuss some topics that might be fair to question, like UAP's and the age of some megalithic sites or methods and conclusions for the archeological theories ... put your tinfoil hat on 😉 but be sceptical about everything......within reasons
Joe Rogan thinking we didn't go to the moon should disqualify him from being allowed to be consumed for entertainment purposes.
Going to the moon was the greatest human achievement of all time? The internet, cellphones, AI, nuclear power, what the fuck do you mean?
Well yeah...leaving the planet and landing humans on another celestial body is monumental.
It is the first step in becoming a multi planet or maybe in a few thousand years, an intergalactic species.
Not to mention all the advancements that came with people trying to figure out how to get to the moon in the 1st place.
A cell phone literally means nothing compared to landing on the moon. You're conflating technological advancement with human achievement. A human running a mile in 4 minutes is incredible, regardless of whether he has a phone or not. Destiny fans are actually rtrded. Why would you even comment this
@swickens930 ...Youre the moron here buddy. How is instant, global telecommunications not a great human achievement? Literally anyone can 4 miles unless youre a cripple or a lardass
@@swickens930Semantics really. The moon landing itself doesn’t effect the lives of anyone, but developments in the attempts to go to the moon has effected everyone.
Yeah its arguably the most impressive thing we've done as a species.
If a race of aliens were to invade earth that's probably the only thing we could show them that would demonstrate we're at least capable of attempting what they're doing. That on a basic level, we're advancing to being an interstellar civilization at some point. We've made progress.
36:26 at least that’s what he thought till he tried the machine himself and immediately got burned, then realized his dad’s just hard AF
rogan: we didnt land on the moon because the pictures were flagged as ai. the pictures that were made before ai
The more you listen to Destiny, the more you realize how much BS he spews.
he is projecting as crazy
Can you give a specific example from this video?
Such as?
@@bertthompson4748 He doesn't understand why people are hesitant about new vaccines being forced upon them. And makes some BS comparisons.
True.
The amount of conspiracies and misinformation that people believe in is getting so depressing and infuriating. It used to be that they were just something one could kind of laugh at because the majority of us knew these things were absurd and believed my crackpot or schizos. Now, it's just so disheartening because there so many different variants that so many different people believe it feels like you are always swimming upstream against it. As an Orthodox Christian, I try to avoid saying I hate people, and when I do use the term, usually it's me being hyperbolic and not actually hating someone. But man, is it hard for me not to hate these people spreading conspiracies and misinformation because it's causing SO much harm.
57 views in 2 minutes, bro fell off
594 in 6min
You are both peak cringe
1,325 in 11 minutes. Christ has arisen.
3227 in 27 min im so happy bro is falling back up
This isn't bros main channel, bro.
The tapes exist, we are seeing mostly recordings nowadays. The screen was just a practical thing, back then, tv worked on analog broadcast. The way old tvs work is with an electron beam, so you send a signal through a wire, ot is tranformed into magnetic fields inside the cathode ray tube tv, which directs a beam of electrons of a certain strength at a screen on the tv that lights up when electrons hit it, color tv has 3, times the pixels and flouresses with three colors, so color tv is just like blsck and white tv, only with three pictures of intensities mixeds together. The signals broadcast are generated by a camera that directly measures the absorption of light on a screen, that emits electrons, the signal is translated into signals that change the intensity based on probing one pixel at a time at the camera and the intensity there is an average over some small time, the signal is transmitted to the tv side, in the tv there is a beam of electrons that scans line by line horizontally every pixel on screen in order, so it shines electons on one pixel at a time to the left for example, tracing the top line of pixels then the one bellow then the one bellow and so on, and this is a rigid motion, shining the electron beam on every pixel in order like this once every 1/24th of a second or whatever the framerate is, you simply transmit the intensities, and you have timing sych that the tv beam synchronises the right intensities wkth the right pixels, search for slow motion tube tv, the technology is actually insanely cool and complicated. But thats basically how it works, you shoot electrons at every pixel in order, in color for example you habe pixel 1 green some intensity, pixel 1 red, some intensity, pixel 1 blue, some intensity, and so on for all the pixels every frame, one color pixel at a time. The way it is encoded in ak analog way is genius, because you just use the reverse process at the camera, you can pixel 1 throigh a red filter, then green the blue and transmit the intensities in order, all you need to do then is synchronise the travel of the electron beam with the order of pixels from the output, and you can just transmit the signal without worrying about storing the data of all those pixels every 1/24th of a second for the entire screen, it just automatically syncs up based on some frame counter mechanism like a specific peak or something in the signal you can use for synchronisation. It is truely genuinely genius, but also simple enough, you just scan on one side and print on the other and directly transmit the signal. And thats why they used a screen, so broadcasters with analog equipment could do it, and did not have to reciev an independent radio version of the signal and then decode it or something. Nasa did that for them. What do you think? Do you think joe rogan would believe he has any business doubting or even ranking the difficulty of any tech back then if he knew how marvellous even TV broadcasting was back then? I think if he knew he would be a bit more humble, the little box doesn't use magic, people built this stuff, and its amazing, its really hard to make stuff that works, but engineers and physicists are pretty amazing all in all.
Not believing in the moon landing is not as dumb as flat earth but it’s close.
You could say it orbits the flat earth belief.
Its not ok that you rely on things that you, in the same breath, set fire to. People release themselves for less.
19:24 this is the most epic rant I've ever heard.
the van allen radiation belt is thin enough at the top that if you pass through it going screaming fast, its like getting an xray. like how if something is very hot, you just brush a part of it very lightly and quickly, not burning yourself. like holding your hand over a handle, it hurts to hold it directly over, but it doesn't hurt to pass over the flame quickly.
If the van allen belt is so hot that our manned space craft couldn’t make it through, wouldnt that mean that it would be too hot for unmanned space craft as well? Also, how hot is re-entry into our atmosphere, I can’t believe how dumb Rogan has become.
The Van Alen belts are harmful, and the astronauts that went to the moon DID go through them, NASA chose a route to go through a thinner portion, and still those astronauts suffered issues due to the radiation they were exposed to.
Not tht needing any of that information is necessary, all you need is the logic that was already mentioned
It's amazing and highly important how easy you can confidently debunk all the bs that has infested internet by using the actual internet. Just takes a bit of filtering sources back into reality. Seems we are hopefully starting to catch up with the massive flaws of the internet age by us starting to understand the vast information flow. However, I'm still excruciatingly frustrated and worried with the possibilities.