I just saw something that blew my mind. In this video, when she shows the paintings in the bottom of the statue they are exactly the same than those on the Qustul incense burner found in nubia. Wow.
Isn't Egypt IN Africa? So... Idk. Wtvr. They were who they were. Whatever the color of their skin. Why make it a racist issue now? Is SHE doing that? I can't imagine why she would. What difference does it make? If people didn't always draw attention to it, it wouldn't exist. Just look at little kids. They don't give a shit. They just accept everyone all the same until someone makes them aware of it. We are all in this together. Stop making a big deal out of it and it will go away. Kids don't know racism until someone shows it to them. Isn't the end goal to make it go away? Can't make it go away unless we stop pointing it out. What a waste of time.
The people of this region called themselves Kemites, not Egyptians. Egypt is a Greek word. The period of antiquity she speaks of had a heavy Nubian or sub-Saharan influence. The athropormorphic images like Horus, Thoth, and others were not Gods, but philosophical principles to live by. They were called Neters (nature). Thoth, for example, represented thought, writting, mathematics and other ideas. The main deified concept that Egyptologist avoid is the "Amen" (The unseen one). This is a Kemetic word used to acknowledge the creator of all things. There are too many loose ends in Egyptology that make it difficult to tie everything together without doing your own research. Much of it is intentional.
Europe is an Roman ideal. The Romans were Grecophile. Hence the choice in naming. If the lady were an African. Maybe then she'd say Kemite. She said nothing wrong in that respect. Europeans call the archetype's Gods. Modern Catholics, American Christians, Mormons & Muslims think of a God as an actual being. The higher cultured people's around the world, see religion as astronomy / ology archetypes.
@@Nubian_Traveller There are those who are either ignorant or are In denial. African culture thrived for thousands of years before its history was interrupted by barbaric culture vultures. This is not hypothesis, its fact! The origins of philosophy, science and the arts began with the Nubian. They were the first to walk upright and have thought. The original Homosapien Sapien. There are white washed versions of African consciousness throughout western culture. From classical music, the eye of Horus and the Pyramid on the back of the US dollar bill to the obelisk in Vatican Square and the Washington monument. The movies of African Queens and Pharoahs are always white. It's absolutly about color. If one is speaking about ancient Kemet, they are talking about color. Kemet means: The land of the blacks. Egyptologist avoid that name because of its definition. The fact that she didn't mention color is a coded attempt to deceive by assuming its implied.
@@JazzEnthusiast very well put,I read on another board that someone trying to say that people of Uganda were Caucasian. Lol and that these people built kemet. So I guest some of these people came from ta-seti.
@@ta-setiwarrior1848 yeah, then painted black people all over the temple walls and knocked the noses off of their sculptures. Riiiiiight! Pure trumpery.
@Nick Nack If one calls any place in the east "ancient Egypt" . they are hiding the truth or don't know the real history. Egypt , in the beginning, is Alkebulan , it is the entire middle east that includes Iraq , Iran , Syria , Israel , India , just to name a few . The original Alkebulan people were black and the land were ruled by 18 dynastic Kings and Queens that were killed along with 50 million original Jews. The biblical book "Exodus" is directly talking about the mass exodus of the people that left the region to escape the slaughter. If they want to talk about the "Egyptian culture" , you must start with the people who were there in Alkebulan and what happened to them before the lines in the sands were drawn. So ... They are talking about black History , not Egyptian history ! Truth
Interesting that she admits that the early stonework is of a much higher quality than the later works. Yet she, and the entire scholarly community, offer no cogent explanations as to why that is.
She didn't say stone work. She said pottery. And things change. You think a cup made by an Irish person in 1800 is the same as a pot in 2021. I don't think so. And she's talking about a culture that spanned thousands of years. And when things are mass produced they change. We know that now from when we would sow our own clothes. Now we get everything mass produced from China.
@@lobo1928 so does that mean at the beginning your an expert? Rookiea are experts? Cuz thats what happened in egypt .. this women is clueless and a liar
You mentioned the earlier artifacts were more intricate than the following atrifacts, is that something to make you wonder if the same civilazation was present or another one
Happens in many cultures, even ours. Take a look at the original Penn station in New York, marble and travertine work of art that was torn down for the ugly, squat concrete and steel version now...
Listening to Dr. Teeter's lecture, one would think that the origin of Egyptian civilization came from their pottery. She went through more than 40 minutes without once mentioning the people. It's almost painful to hear the deliberate circumnavigation of the people except for the subtle mention of the role that the northern kingdom played in the formation of Egyptian culture. Absolutely no mention of The Nabta Playa: th-cam.com/video/snjXEM1ZgBY/w-d-xo.html
I understand the desire for more narrative driven history but if that's what you're after, just watch a different video. There's plenty of videos on the Pharaohs and everyday life of Egyptians citizens. But the pottery and other material remains are the only reason we know anything about those people in the first place. The fact you think she didn't mention the people at all throughout this video just tells me that you shouldn't be engaging with this type of historical analysis because it was the people who made that pottery. That's the whole point of the lecture. Seeing what information we can gather through the examination of material remains.
@@IreliAmBad if you think that pottery is the main reason we know anything about Egyptian civilization you're sadly mistaken. So much of what we know of ancient Egypt is due to the preponderance of evidence found on the temples, pyramids, tombs papyri, ancient texts written by foreigners traveling and/or studying in Egypt, linguistic structure and culture and "religion" and the culture of the other nearby civilizations ie Kush and Axum.
@@iayyam I was talking about material remains in general. Pottery was just the example the OP used. My point was that, if you're more into the study of people, that's totally legitimate. But to criticize this lecture due to a lack of a character-centric focus, just came across as rude and a little naive. Expecially when OP framed it as "deliberate circumnavigation." Written sources are obviously invaluable to the study of history but without the intense analysis of material remains to coroberate the sources claims, there's very little a historian can definitively extrapolate from it. That all being said, I shouldn't have said "pottery is the only reason we know about those people". I should have said "material remains such as pottery are the only reason we know about those people"
@@IreliAmBad @IreliAmBad Thanks for directing my academic interests but I'm old enough to make my own choices. My problem with Dr. Teeter's lecture has nothing to do with the subject matter that she chose to explore - I learned some things - but that she never seem to discuss the people who created the civilization in a lecture with the grandiose title "Origins of Egyptian Civilization". Not a big leap.
“…communities in Upper Egypt began to coalesce into three regional groupings....Strategic factors help to explain the early dominance of these three prehistoric kingdoms. One kingdom was centered on the town of Tjeni (near modern Girga), a site where the floodplain narrowed and allowed the town’s inhabitants to control river traffic. This area was also where trade routes from Nubia and the Saharan oases met the Nile Valley. A second territory had its capital at Nubt (the golden,” modern Nagada). Which controlled access to gold mines in the Eastern Desert via the Wadi Hammamats on the opposite bank of the river. A third kingdom had grown up around the settlement of Nekhen, which like Tjeni, was the starting point of a desert route to the oases (and then to Sudan) and, like Nubt, controlled access to important Eastern Desert gold reserves, in this case the more southernly deposits reached via a wadi directly opposite the town.” Dr. Toby Wilkinson
PT3. The first University in Europe was the University in Salamanca in Spain, built by African. Not only the bricks that built the building were put up by Africans but the educational curriculum was a direct copy of that taught at the University of Djenne in Ghana, which was itself burnt down and later rebuilt as the University of Sankore in Timbuktu. That whole euro-centric 'sub-Sahara' BS is the weakest nonsense you can hear from ones who know nothing of their own history, let alone Africa.
Well.that bollocks but thanks for the "everything started in Africa" BS. Africa been a backwater since the Egypt was eclipsed, apart from the flowering of Islamic thought around the turn of the 1st millenia. That flowering was based almost entirely on what came out of Greece and the Middle East and didn't last long once that learning found its way back to the West. Nice try though. Next you'll be telling us that the NASA space programme originated in the Congo and space rockets were actually built in the African jungles.
@@Telcontar1962 you sound like a racist ass. It's not us that tell you that but your countrymen..you sound like a damn cave man mad at history..you in your racist little head may think Africa was a back water but to the contrary Africans did build schools in Europe..this is all written knowledge and because you don't like it doesn't change it..Even the first Europeans were from Black Africa just like Cheddar Man..keep your hate we are interested in real history and knowledge..people like you is what makes this world the hateful place it is. Racist ass..
PT2...which is followed for about 1,000 years by predominately African types. Pyramid building, mummification, the deities that were to build the pantheon of Gods of the Egyptians, all the religious, political, and scientific traditions that were to make classical Egypt the beginnings of the Pharaohonic period is found in Nubia at Qustul 200 years before it even begins to take a shape and to be carried forward into Egypt.
The pharaohs came from the land of gods, ancestors ,the land of Punt located in Somali territory and we found recently many ancient pharaonic kings from Punt . "Encyclopædia Britannica describes Punt as follows: “in ancient Egyptian and Greek geography, the southern coast of the Red Sea and adjacent coasts of the Gulf of Aden, corresponding to modern coastal Eritrea, Somalia and Djibouti ."/ In “The Making of Egypt” (1939). Petrie states that the Land of Punt was “sacred to the Egyptians as the source of their race.” « Again the representations of the early Puntites, or Somali people, on the Egyptian monuments, show striking resemblances to the Egyptians themselves. » By Brian Brown New York: Brentano's[1923]
+Zenme Yangzi Then show us the culture,language & science before Kemet ...even after show us You will only find this evidence in Africa starting further south even the Kemetu said they came from the south. Bantu,Wolof,Asante,Yoruba, to name just a few all show continuity in the culture and linguistics after Kemet Case closed!
+Zenme Yangzi These morons are unable to face that they are wrong. There is too many of these idiots going around claiming that "African" Americans Descended from Ancient Egyptian pharaoh's. Kind of like how the Nazi's claimed that the white blue eyed Germans descended from the 'Aryan "master" race'.. Anything to justify their racism and hatred of others. Just like these black "khemits" who want to feel superior to white people and other races based on this ideology they have made up. It's sad how many forms racism takes... sad shit...
+Zenme Yangzi LOL!!! >>> "E-M78 is a west european clade" <<< LOL!!! M78 DOES NOT originate in Western "europe"...although it is dominant there. Remember the E in E-M78. The E haplogroup is African Retard...don't you know that M78 is an offshoot of V68...which is an offshoot of M243...which is an offshoot of the parent M215...E1b1b. M78 IS NOT "caucasian DNA". Now...the FACTS...as told by "whites" about themselves, in regard to genetics, haplogroups, SNP's, etc. "Haplogroup E1b1b (formerly known as E3b) represents the last major direct migration from Africa into Europe. It is believed to have first appeared in the Horn of Africa approximately 26,000 years ago and dispersed to North Africa and the Near East during the late Paleolithic and Mesolithic periods. E1b1b lineages are closely linked to the diffusion of Afroasiatic languages." www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_E1b1b_Y-DNA.shtml "Late glacial migration of E-M78 to Mediterranean EuropeIt is still unclear when haplogroup E first entered Europe. The earliest known prehistoric sample to date is an E-V13 from Catalonia dating from 5000 BCE. So we know for sure that E1b1b was present in southern Europe at least since the Early Neolithic. Nonetheless, the possibility of other migrations of E1b1b to southern Europe during the Mesolithic or Late Palaeolithic cannot be ruled out. It is highly probable that the E-M78 subclade, found at relatively high frequencies in Mediterranean Africa, especially in Egypt (45% of the population) migrated to southern Europe before Neolithic herders from the Cardium Pottery culture arrived." These are essentially Black people...genetically...although with admixture
15:15 That design reminds me of a hide shield -- compare the typical Zulu style shield, animal hide with a long stick in the middle, protruding at the bottom and decorated with some sort of tuft at the top. Or even those big Medieval European duelling shields that you rested on the ground.
Just a hypothesis, if the level of art in Egypt has been such since the dawn of their civilization and continued on thru the next millenia with the same compelling consistency as Ms. Teeter suggests, then what happened in the pre- and post-Ptolemaic (Cleopatra) Dynasty? Are they still the same ancient ethnic group or is it that the Mayan enigma happened to the original ethnic Egyptian? Where is the ancient race? I'm sure Zahi Hawas and Hosni Mubarak aren't one of them lol. Any answers?
Who knows if you're even alive anymore, but the answer is simple: the ancient Egyptians are the modern Egyptians. Their gene pool is just a little different (and only a _little_ different) from all the foreign invasions throughout their history. The Arab invasions displaced their leadership - but it was never going to displace the native population of one of the most densely populated regions of antiquity; and modern Egyptian peasants, particularly the Copts, still carry out many traditions that can be traced back to ancient Egypt, and even some elements of their language, calendar, &c. In regard to Cleopatra/the Ptolemies, who were Greek, they actually married into the high Roman aristocracy through descent from the children of Cleopatra with Marc Antony, and from there into the royalty & nobility of much of the ancient Mediterranean. Apparently, Queen Zenobia, who rebelled against Rome with her breakaway Palmyrene Empire during the Crisis of the Third Century, was a descendant of Cleopatra. After the capture of Zenobia & her children, they lived in a villa near Rome granted them by Emperor Aurelian; but after that, the trail in history goes cold. Most likely some noble Italian families are their distant descendants.
She talks about digging in the north/south of egypt? You already did dig in europe? What did you find in Europe? What did you find in Greece (nothing)?
@Micheal Hnat they would just find more Black people (in Europe). Like the Grimaldi or Aurignacian people. White people are indigenous to NOWHERE. Not even Europe... hence their need to claim everyone else's heritage....
@@moosieh1By depictions, Sculptures, mummies and Anthropology we know Egyptians weren't black Only black Egyptians known in history were not even Egyptians but a Nubian Dynasty that conquered Egypt lead by King Kashta in Approximately the year 750 BC. Six Cushite Pharaohs took over until they were defeated. This Cushite Dynasty was defeated by the Assyrians and the real Egyptians were restored to power.
Thank you anonymous internet user... Your small contribution.. to this videos comment section... has improved mine and others viewing experience... I wish only that... it were possible for there to be someone as considerate as yourself... in every comment section.. I will now enjoy this video... minus the irrelevant introduction of the speaker... thanks to your maintenance of the internet.. I onc
If any of this is based on rigor, it's certainly not being conveyed. I'm much more interested in how they come to know any of these claims, than merely a handful of fun facts. Take just about any claim she's made and apply it to modern or even better documented historically eras. You realize such a simple claim would only capture a small segment of the population and certainly not build any over-arching narrative for even that sub-culture. Spirals being whimsical recreations of the stones patter? Or maybe just someone being creative with patterning. Absolutely no effort to convey the rigor behind the claims.
All of this video is about blacks , there were no Egypt during the 1st , 2nd , 3rd and so on . 18 dynastic rules of black Kings and Queens as there was no place by the name of Egypt.
But the region where Egypt is back then is still the same today just because it wasn’t called Egypt doesn’t mean it wasn’t egypt. Africa wasn’t called Africa back then but we still use the history of Africa back then and use the name Africa for it . Name doesn’t matter it’s still in the same region and place.
True according to to every graph that every ancient Egyptians weren't black yet some graphs shows black pharohs and minister and workers as well and majority of ancient egyptian were dark brown and light brown for women yet some graphs shows light and white skin ppl even blond people .the origins of egyptian is north africans (brown people) but since Egypt had many wars and relationships through the years it was mixed with other races but not too much as for now egyptian are 5%european 18%arab and 87% north africans as you can see in the modern egyptian the similarities in skin and hair and after all as an Egyptian i don't give a fuck about neither did the ancient egyptian so even if we were green it really means nothing for any of you as long as you aren't egyptian have great life
@@mariamdiallo6420 Egypt is Afrika , they drew lines in the sands to make it less obvious who was there before Rome (evil) arrived. Goggle the word EGYPT and you will know who the people were in the beginning. Afrika is spelled just this way, they changed it ( England) , Enlarged is Rome. Afrikanus was the leader of the army out of Rome that invaded a place originally known as Alkebulan. Rome killed over 50 million original Jews who God called Israel. Israel is not a place on your map as historians will have you to believe, Israel is a people that consisted of 12 tribes. Afrikanus renamed the place (Alkebulan) after himself as he thought his slaughtering was a good things. Alkebulan was ruled by 18 dynastic kings and queens that were black and they tried to hide this fact by defacing all the statues in the land , even the sphinx in Giza. You much come to a poibt of realization that the lies were to hide the fact of who the people were. The slaughter of 50 million Original black Jews were atrocious and the survivors left out of the East in a mass exodus and the book of Exodus in your bible is about this event. The survivors are those who Columbus discovered in a land now known as America , they were black and they are ISRAEL. They, like the bible says , were enslaved for 400 years and because of who they were to God , had suffered just as Christ suffered. They were whipped and also hung from a tree, just as Christ was. We are here, we were first in the garden and satan took every effort to keep Israel nound up in bondage, enslaved to his ways. Still to this day, the bloodline of israel (black and brown) are hated because God called them his children and they are the blessed one's. There's so much you don't know or don't want to know because it would decimate the church as you have come to know it, if the trith was known. Christ was a black man from the bloodline of the first man to be formed , Christ was black.
We also learn that the Pyramids of Nubia, located to the South of Egypt are far older than the Pyramids found in the North. Likewise, the Metu Neter is much older and many of the scripts found furthest South have not been ciphered by main stream Egyptologist. We find that the Ancient Nubians migrated further North along the Nile, building Civilizations and Temples, practicing the Mysteries of the Universe. We see such ancient mysteries among the Dogon and many other Tribes.
that is most simply not true the pyramids in Sudan are from 8th century BCE on all they are more plentiful there is nothing on the scale that you find at Giza
@@markb43752000 no you’re talking about different thing those pyramids that were built from the 8th century BCE to 400AD were also built by native Egyptians to honour their ancestors who had live and ruled kemet. He’s talking about different pyramids. the Nubia(lower Nubia/upper Nubia m) of the ancient times was not an ethnic marker, but a region bounded by the first and sixth cataracts of the river Iteru (Nile). The name of a non-Egyptian kingdom south of Nubia is “Kush". 3 out of the forty-two traditional administrative divisions of ancient Egypt were located in ancient Nubia, and that part of Nubia was not considered as part of Kush. Kush conquered Nubia at the end of the old kingdom for(700 years), Nubia was retaken during the new kingdom hence why you see Kushites in captivity. The word “Nubia” wasn’t even employed until the late Roman era.
Vor allem die Pyramiden sind Technologie, die jeder Seismologe ohne Zweifel erkennt, aber niemand frägt einen. Ein Experiment, das die Funktion auch heute noch beweist, könnte für ein Erdbeben in der Wissenschaft und den Religionen sorgen.
All these an isn't sites held black or blackness in the highest regard yet people still claim these places didn't not begin with black people its amazing to me, the Gods were Black, I don't know that people would paint their god black if they weren't highly respected and indeed black, I mean look how hard it is non black people to accept the Egyptians being Black, how much harder would it be for people to accept their god as black.
I hate the amount of guesswork that goes on. She clearly doesn't know how or why about most of this stuff. Just say you don't know, don't make stupid guesses.
I like how Europeans like speaking on the culture in Kemet and they pick and chose what they want to expose and try to put themselves in there. Lady, how can u speak on a peoples culture when yours is marded with evil and make-believe?
The Ancient Kemetic/Egyptian Civilization and Culture began in the South of Africa, near Uganda. The earliest form of Metu Neter or Hieroglyphics originated in the South of the Nile Valley. We learn from the natives themselves, which states that, "We come from the beginning of the Nile, where the God Hapi dwells..." We learn from the Greeks themselves that the Egyptians were a black race of people. See Herodotus, Aristotle, Manetho, Count DeVolney, Albert Churchward, Gerald Massey, Budge, etc.
winston morris - Herodotus didn't say that the Egyptians were a black people. Here is what he did say. Book 2 22. The third of the ways is much the most specious, but nevertheless it is the most mistaken of all: for indeed this way has no more truth in it than the rest, alleging as it does that the Nile flows from melting snow; whereas it flows out of Libya through the midst of the Ethiopians, and so comes out into Egypt. How then should it flow from snow, when it flows from the hottest parts to those which are cooler? And indeed most of the facts are such as to convince a man (one at least who is capable of reasoning about such matters), that it is not at all likely that it flows from snow. 29 The first and greatest evidence is afforded by the winds, which blow hot from these regions; the second is that the land is rainless always and without frost, whereas after snow has fallen rain must necessarily come within five days, so that if it snowed in those parts rain would fall there; the third evidence is afforded by the people dwelling there, who are of a black colour by reason of the burning heat. Moreover kites and swallows remain there through the year and do not leave the land; and cranes flying from the cold weather which comes on in the region of Scythia come regularly to these parts for wintering: if then it snowed ever so little in that land through which the Nile flows and in which it has its rise, none of these things would take place, as necessity compels us to admit. As you can see Herodotus was talking about the source of the Nile and the colour of the people who lived. He was not talking about the Egyptians.
@@fredgillespie5855 well the Nile is Egypt that makes the nubian also. ,you all didn't expect brown/re-branded black people to wake from the deep sleep, well we are wide awake and we are taking back our history.
Wow. This was uploaded in 2011, so I wonder how much has happened in the field, literally and figuratively, since then. I am obsessed with Neolithic developments around the world. I think of the world as the diaspora of North Africa and the Middle East particularly with regard to culture, which for me is far more interesting that the genetic story (as I have always assumed that we are all related, rooted in the Cradle/Horn region of the world.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE "Middle East ", the term was concocted by Queen Victoria's foreign ministers and is a Geopolitical confection,the term you seek is the Levant,
Could you imagine if the Neanderthal tribes that became Europe and the early tribes of Ancient Greece did not make it out of the ice age...we would have a full technologically developed African empire....and clean water
Brother, you let that Black Panther comic-book fantasy movie fuck with your mind. The people that settled Europe were adventurous, curious men and women who were smart enough to get the hell out of that shit-hole you're so proud of and ventured many thousands of miles to establish a whole new continent where they flourished and emerged as world explorers, conquerers, city-builders and sea-farers. All this while you stayed put, burned out early, retreated to your mud-huts and dreamed about being a great civilization...and for the most part, remained in your mud-huts to this very day. I mean, think about it, blaming neanderthals for your failures is pretty fuckin' weak. Jus' sayin'.
That's right. And now I can make my own choice in which to believe. Many hear only a one side story from K to College. I was fortunate to hear 2 sides to the story!
+phard2345 Yes, it's like listening to a five year old tell her make believe story - she is insane and she doesn't realize it and apparently neither does any one else in the audience - including the "scholars".
+phard2345 These lunatics believe the lie that the old maps are "inaccurate" - actually the old maps reveal hundreds of truths. Did you know Libya dominated all of Africa before Egypt was ever thought of? Libya was named after a "god" - so was Egypt - and Europe - and Asia. Of course, all these "gods" were just figments of the imagination of the "primitive cave dwellers" who were slicing mountains into giant boulders, transporting the megaliths long distances and erecting them into geometrically-precise positions - all around the world - Latin America, Africa, Greece, Rome, the Middle East, all across Asia, etc. Curiously, North America does not have one elaborate megalithic site - because it was covered by "an ice age" - wrong again. North America was covered by sea water. The lies from these "experts" are never-ending. If the experts had the answers, would the world be in such a mess? The experts are idiotic impostors, propped up by the same parasites that control our political system, our economic system, our justice system, healthcare system, education system, scientific paradigms and theories, peer review, the military, the history and the historical timeline - these parasitic hybrid evil incarnates look human but they are not human - hook one of them up to an EEG and the brainwave pattern is so bizarre it does not appear human - because they are not human. They look human because of the influx of human DNA down through the generations but they are devoid of compassion, empathy, guilt, remorse and love - because they are not human. These parasites siphon trillions of dollars off our economy every year so they can live like royalty while posing as our leaders. Humans are poisoned, drugged, numbed and programmed into oblivion. Few people realize the truth. The evil incarnate parasites and their fake "experts" desperately exploit others because they are empty inside. No one who feels love, peace and happiness wastes their time seeking social status and wealth. Even the University of Chicago - prestigious as it is - hosts this garbage. Check the IQ's of your "experts" before you put 'em on a pedestal. Thank you for your reply.
I wonder if ppl gave jars of things to the deceased to take with them or something. Bc of course, its not like youre dead and you pick out jars to offer to a god. They seem like some kind of gifts or offerings in respect of the dead to bury with them to be with them i their journey or something. Its interesting to dig up but also sad. I imagine many locals could contribute explanations.
Weldon Clark Egyptians were not friends of Nigros But enemies , read and learn who was who the evidence is irrefutable. www.quora.com/How-did-the-ancient-Greeks-describe-the-appearance-of-the-Egyptians/answer/Majed-Ahmed-11?ch=10&share=1c620cbd&srid=5fNCq
@@weldonclark8442 Ah, very true. Almost all white people have some percentage of Neanderthal genes in them. As do Asians also, although there DNA contains that Asian Neanderthal gene. I was curious if that might explain the difference in IQ between Asians, Caucasians, and Sub-Saharan Africans. There is about a 3 IQ point difference between Asians and Caucasians, and then another 4 IQ points difference between Caucasians and Sub-Saharan Africans. As of yet it is completely unexplained as to why there would be such a drastic difference between those three groups. Personally, I am 6% victim, and am waiting for my payday.
Before the Pyramids? Have they started carbon dating stone now? If I carve my initials into the Washington Monument today can we then assume that the monument was constructed today in my name?
Does it really matter what color they had? Doesn't matter if you're black, white, yellow or whatever if you think this is an issue you put way too much importance on race. Judging people based on that is just as stupid as judging people on what color of shirt they wear.
The Sumerians called themselves sag-giga, meaning "the black-headed people" (W. Hallo, W. Simpson. The Ancient Near East. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1971, 28.) In numerous inscribed tablets, the Sumerians refer to themselves in this fashion. Not black-haired, but black-headed.
I'm only 10 minutes in, how is it you haven't mentioned, let's say, the serapeum at saqqara or the osirion? What about corundum pots turned on high technology lathes?. Sorry but I really don't think you should be a university
Informative. However, I was expecting to hear about the geographic origins of the predynastic settlers, but the focus was mostly on material culture. I was also skeptical of some of the interpretations. For example, she sounds a little too confident when she declares an artisan or a royal was "showing off." We need more Africans in these spaces to gather and interpret the data.
We don’t need more “Africans” in these spaces. Ancient Egypt is part of all of our human heritage, and we need smart and qualified experts. The Ancient Egyptians didn’t look like you because Egypt is farther from the equator than your ancestors.
I totally agree. Europe is essential a juvenile delinquent yet it attempts to enlighten us on the most advanced civilization in human history. How? European scholars have a history or obscuring, distorting, omitting, and outright lying about History. Unfortunately her commentary and analysis simply cannot be trusted.
@@colinreese Egypt is in Africa so, yes, we need more Africans and fewer whites. Egyptology has a long history of racism that won't be fixed if we ignore disparities in funding and training both of which are rooted in imperialism. White people have enjoyed centuries of affirmative action. The ancient Egyptians were close enough to the equator to be dark complexioned. They certainly weren't "caucasian" as Merrick Posnansky insisted when I was a freshman at UCLA in the late 90s. This claim was also made by UCLA professor, Jared Diamond, in his award winning book, "Guns, Germs, and Steel" (i think its in chapter 11). Moreover, scientists believe that pale skin only evolved less than 12 kya.
@@kwamezulushabazz No one thinks the ancient Egyptians had blonde hair and light skin, so it’s false to claim that anyone thinks this. Europeans can have brown skin, which is probably lost on you. Dark complexioned doesn’t mean black. Black is Sub-Saharan African. White skin is 40,000 years old not 12,000 years old. Racism isn’t a white phenomenon, and disparities in funding and training aren’t due to racism. Anyone in the world can study Egyptology if they want to. You’re quite the racist. If you’re of West African or Sub-Saharan African origin, then the ancient Egyptians are not your ancestors. Your overall premise of “we need fewer whites” is quite racist and reveals your true motivation.
@@colinreese I didn't say dark = Black. The claim that the ancient Egyptians were Caucasian is a holdover from racists Egytologists. Anyone who denies the racist history of Egyptology is either delusional or dishonest. Google it and educate yourself. Most studies I have seen on skin color indicate that pale skin evolved less than 20 kya. White people and white scientists have had centuries of affirmative action. That's not an "agenda," it's a fact.
Another thing is if you read Manetho you would see that the Kushites/Ethiopians were enemies of the Pharoahs of Egypt. They would lead military campaigns against them. Then around 1800 BC a group of Semites known as the Hyksos took over Egypt and formed an alliance with Kushites to try to take over all Egypt. Both were driven out. The Hyksos are the Jews, Kushites are Blacks. Both were enemies to Egypt and forced out eventually.
It doesn't matter what any caucasoid has to say about my comment Europeans for all of history for everything that I can dig up a fine I've only travel with three things excuse me 4 missionaries first then domination death and destruction has been the European Credo for all of history and if anybody knows anything about history they know that
Nature Lover It’s true because all of the pharaohs in the old kingdom (pyramid builders) were black like sneferu, khafre, and khufu. And Herodotus who came to Egypt in the 5th century bc said on first appearance the Egyptians had dark skin and wooly hair. It was the Persians, assyrians, Greeks and romans who caused the genotype to change because they were occupying Egypt for the longest. Look at it this way, in 1492, the Native American population in America was 60 million now in 2020 it has been reduced to 5 million in just 530 years unlike Egypt which has had ongoing foreign rulers after the old kingdom for 3,000 years. If you connect the dots you can see how similar it is to ancient Egyptian.
there is no doubt that people we call today The ancient Egyptians or Khemetic/kmt people were Black Africans who moved this land of Egypt over 30-20,000 years ago according to the ancient zodiacal systems , most of their DNA code is which is (E1B1B1 ) is still live and well amongst the East Africans ( Sudan, Ethiopens and the Somalis )
When i hear 3000bc, well no need to listen any further , the great pyramid was built 25000 years ago.this is already common knowledge among learned people.Moses left Egypt over 5770 years ago , no construction took place after or during his time there., this is just an example that your guys are wrong.
please allow me to say.. Any negative or belittling comment on this platform regarding the history of any time period of Africa, is an indication of how your fore parents must have felt about a people who once, and still in many ways, dwarfed them spiritually. You do not see yourselves in the original people that God has created in his image. That is like having a mother that you despise. Having a mother that you despise suggests that she has done something to cause you to despise her. One thing that I can say about a man who despises, and resents his mother, is that it leaves him mentally unstable, cold and empty inside. How does one go from 1 through 9 months in the protection of his mothers womb, being nutured so that his heart, spine, and brain is formed to allow him to be born healthy and strong.. to feed from the nutrients of her breast.. teach him how to walk and talk.. and he turns on her the minute he is able to provide for himself???? here is a mirror for you to look in. Your mother showed love you by bringing you into this world.. what did your mother do to you to deserve this kind of disrespect?! Nevertheless you set out to discredit her.. and make sure you tell half truths about her. Well let me let you in on a little secret to account of history will soon be discredited, because the children of God is awakening once again. They are now investigating and studying for himself and teaching it to his kids. pretty soon he will be strong enough to judge the wicked based on his history.
@@Eris123451 lol is babbling the best that you can do? Im guessing you do not have a better explanation. If you do have a better understanding please share it.
You didn't explore the "mother" metaphor deeply enough, it didn't deal with a mother who was a whore, who had you because she was too shallow, scared and lazy to get an abortion, who barely kept you fed who let you run the streets in ragged clothes with snot caked all over your face and crusts in your eyes, who left you with your 11 year old sister while she ran around for days at a time smoking dope and sleeping with every loser in town, who finally (because she was never gonna change.) sent you to her parents house to live, never visited and died when she was 45 years old from sclerosis of the liver...you kind of (in your ecstatic, matriarchal, pseudo-intellectual fervor.) failed to advise the child of THAT mother. Now, while your questioning the motives of people you know nothing about attach your mother-metaphor to the child of that woman and then apply the result to your historical theory and then tell me again: Who are the wicked ones and who will judge them?
The Greeks always accepted the fact that Egypt was an African concept the formation of Egypt had it's beginnings in sub-Saharan Africa the Romans also believe this and understood this well but we have to realize the Greeks and the Romans were not poisoned by the concept of race when excavations begin in Egypt by the French during the time of Napoleon the idea of Africans was already tarnished by 300 years of racial propaganda so there was no way they were going to accept that Western civilization was built upon a civilization that was the brainchild of indigenous Africans
I have been to Egypt during a discovery or opening of a tomb. The only blacks in the Egyptian kingdoms were slaves. The pictures or very detailed and blatant about that. I also in the museums did see blacks as soldiers. But this is not a black race kingdom at all. You have been deceived. I have seen it with my own eyes untouched by modern man. This Egyptian fellow on youtube that seems to have a real problem with his heritage being hijacked has many examples that are true. Though he seems to be a little hostile. ASuperEgyptian
+largelysubatomic I totally agree. Its funny you say that, because I remember, not long ago, the most eminent Scientists could prove the intelligent of a man by the 'bumps on his head'. They locked up Gallileo for suggesting that the Earth not flat and Marconi for getting information 'out of the air'. Luckily, since 9/11 people have woken up to 'quackdemics.' So have you seen the DREAD LOCKS on king Ahmenenhet II? Or the many statues of the 25th Dynastic Princes? Or King Huni or Taharka? Even the many statues of Rameses cannot be disputed.
+Kevin doss Herodotus went to UPPER Egypt to learn...and his anthropological/sociological chronicles titled "Histories" focused on what is now the Middle East, Central Asia, North and East Africa. Greeks did not see themselves or were aware of the concept of "European" or "Western" civilization.
***** What is the use of good looks if you have only that as an offer to the world? The so called ugly man created all musical styles we know of today. They created the Blues over 100 years ago. Jazz 90 yrs ago. Soul music 65yrs ago. Funk 55yrs ago. Hip Hop 45yrs ago. And not only music, The Paterson brothers made the 1st cars (yes a black owned company). Lazer Eye surgery was created by a so called Black woman. To name a few. What gifts to the word? Yes you have been on that land for over 400 years and are part of the land. But you are ever fated to hate the Nubians and all that look like then for pretending to be them. If that technology, left by the ancients were of your blood-line, then your people would know the ancient knowledge encoded in Ancient Egyptian Philosophy. It is a shame, because no doubt you are a good man, that love your people.
22:50 onward the offering to the God or God(s) is African to it's Core! West to Southern All have done this! Why is it so hard to believe these people didn't just spring up over night or Came from places further than the surrounding areas.
Why do they have ti come from anywhere at all? Why is everybody trying to claim Egyptian civilization? Of course there were people that came ti Egypt and even rulers that came from outside Egypt like Berber Pheroes, but it remains Egyptian made in Egypt by the hand of Egyptians. Yes, it's Egypt is part of Africa, but let's not attribute things to other parts of Africa just because we don't think they're black enough. I say the same thing applies to those from outside. I'm not Egyptian by the way- just an annoyed person on the Internet
@@MoSec9 Because it pisses off others that ancient Egypt was located in Africa. It would have been in Europe, or Asia, there would be no problem; We would naturally infer it is whites or Asians who built this civilization. Since it is in Africa, they try to dissociate this civilization from black people. So yes, it is important to know their origins; which is also legitimate because we all come from somewhere. What you call "they are Egyptians" is nonsense because they did not use "egyptians" to identify themselves..
LOL, most of these mainstream academics won't even consider the Egyptians had better tools than a copper chisel and some pounding stones, you think they're interested in discussing race?
u fucking idiot, none of u will accept the truth, u hate your real heritage so muc,lol, sub saharian African.although knowing what the world knows about them ,lol, I don't blame you,lol,lol,lol
Has anyone ever wondered why so-called "Afrocentric" scholars (not only black people but also notable white academics) never claim that the other members of the Ptolemaic dynasty before Cleopatra nor that every single Egyptian dynasty up to the time of the Ptolemy was black? That is because they are not just structuring their arguments on some feel-good notion of racial superiority but on written evidence. Some of the most often quoted historians from the time of the ancient Egyptians about what race the people were are Strabo, (born c. 64 bce, Amaseia, Pontus-died after 21 ce), Greek geographer and historian, Diodorus Siculus Diodorus Siculus (fl. 1st century BC) or Diodorus of Sicily a Greek historian, and Herodotus (born in Halicarnassus in the Persian Empire (modern-day Bodrum, Turkey) and lived in the fifth century BC (c. 484-c. 425 BC), "The Father of History"). In his Histories, Herodotus states in several passages that the Egyptians were black. According to most translations, Herodotus says that a Greek oracle was known to be from Egypt because she was "black", that the natives of the Nile region are "black with heat", and that Egyptians were "black-skinned with woolly hair". Lucian of Samosata (125 AD - after 180 AD) observes an Egyptian boy and notices that he is not merely black, but has thick lips. Diodorus Siculus mentioned that the Aethiopians (read sub-Saharan Africa) considered the Egyptians a colony. Apollodorus of Damascus (a Syrian-Greek engineer, architect, designer and sculptor from Damascus, Roman Syria, who flourished during the 2nd century AD), calls Egypt the country of the black-footed ones (or “Aethiopians”). Aeschylus (c. 525/524 - c. 456/455 BC), a Greek poet, wrote that Egyptian seamen had "black limbs." Greeks sometimes referred to Egyptians as Aethiopians - not to be confused with inhabitants of the modern-day nation of Ethiopia who was instead referred to as Abyssinians or Habesha and their land as Abyssinia. Sir Gaston Camille Charles Maspero KCMG was a French Egyptologist (June 23, 1846 - June 30, 1916) states that "by the almost unanimous testimony of ancient [Greek] historians, they [ancient Egyptians] belonged to the African race, which settled in Ethiopia". Quotes from the source material (mostly Greeks and Romans who lived at the time): Pindar, "Cushites, Colchians, and Khazars". Journal of Near Eastern Studies 18 (1): 49-53: a Greek poet also described the Colchians (that Herodotus compares to the Egyptians - their forebears) as being "dark-skinned". Saint Jerome and Sophronius 350 to 400 AD, referred to Colchis as the "second Ethiopia" (sub-Saharan Africa not the country by that name) because of its 'black-skinned' population. Imagine if Pindar had described the people of Colchis as “light-skinned” or Saint Jerome and Sophronius had represented them as the “second Greece” because of their complexions. Neither of these writers did! Aristotle’s “Physiognomika” describes the physical traits of the Egyptians and Ethiopians (sub-Saharan Africans) as bowlegged ("bandy-legged") and 'curly-haired'. He wonders if this is due to the fact that their bodies became "distorted by heat, like logs of wood when they become dry". He contends that the hair of the Ancient Egyptians supports the theory, as it is curlier than that of other nations. Imagine if Aristotle had said “straight-legged” and “fine-hair”; or "straighter" than that of their neighbors to the south. He did not. What if an ancient Greek had described the Egyptians as having hair texture just a little curlier than their own hair but not as curly as their Ethiopian neighbors to the south. This alone would have been enough to perpetuate the “white-Egyptian theory”, however, Aristotle did not! He said the opposite. Strabo Ammianus Marcellinus (325/330-after 391) after his own observation stated that the Egyptians were "mostly brown and black" (like black people). Imagine if Marcellinus had said “mostly pink and tanned” (like whites). This alone would have been enough to perpetuate the “white-Egyptian theory”, however, Marcellinus did not! Marcus Manilius described the Egyptians as lighter than the Moors: "the land of Egypt, flooded by the Nile, darkens bodies more mildly owing to the inundation of its fields." (Before this statement excites you, please note that "Moors" are mostly black and range in complexions like the Egyptians). More to the point, imagine if Manillius had written: the land of Egypt, flooded by the Nile, darkens Egyptians more severely than the Greeks and Asiatic." Imagine if Marcellinus had said "similar to the Romans" or "just a little darker than the Ascetics". This alone would have been enough to perpetuate the “white-Egyptian theory”, however, Manilius did not! There are certainly ancient historical writers like Nearchus, Megasthenes and Eratosthenes (Strabo and Arrian also draw from them) who compare the range of complexions in ancient Egypt to the Indian population of the time. They said that Indians (Indo-Arian linguistic groups and Dravidians) are like the Egyptians and “Ethiopians” (Sub-Saharan black people not modern day Ethiopia and both descended of Ham according to Hebrew writers) burnt in color and described the Egyptians as having similar features (facial bone structure minus prognathism like most Indians) but any forensic Scientist would tell you, modern day Ethiopians, jet-black Sudanese and other Neolithic people who are considered “black”, have these same “Caucasoid” features without prognathism: For further discussion: th-cam.com/video/WUtAxUQjwB4/w-d-xo.html
PT4. The discovery of the Qustul Incense Burner is considered one of the earliest certifiable uses of incense by a culture. This Qustul burner also rose a debate regarding the Nubian origin of Egyptian civilization. Upon the Incense Burner is a relief of a royal procession considered by many archeologists as evidence of the worlds first monarchy. This debate maintains that Nubian culture often referred to as Ta-seti, developed as early as 7000 B.C.
As far as Nubia being the origin of Egyptian kingship. This info challenges that. Many people view Nubia as where Egyptian kingship started. This idea is based on the Qustul incense burner found in Nubia. This info is on a falcon figurine found in the Egyptian city of Hierakonpolis. It's dated to have been made around 3700 B.C. The falcon was associated with kingship in Egypt. So this figurine demonstrates that kingship was already present in Egypt before the Qustul burner(3200 B.C). That incense burner could likely be an Egyptian import into Nubia. Look up: Falcon figurine Renée Friedman
Amateur, a child... you should try former yugoslav clans debating war and history. Thats Ph.D. in trolling, propagation, manipulation and decievement, with heavy toppings of provocation, and what they call "everyday making love with and to, your mother and/sister"... Utter amateur.
Funny how some people reason. Where do you think many African cultures get their tradition of rituals from. Until recent decades, when a king pass away in some parts of Africa (e.g. Yorubaland, south-west Nigeria) the corpse his buried with life human, someone called "abobaku" (meaning he who is to die with the king). Someone who is an "abobaku" live in the palace with the king before his passing to his ancestors. And in our culture we don't say a king die if he passes away. We simply say he has gone to meet his ancestors. One only need to compare cultural practices in ancient Egypt to different parts of the world and see where some of these practises are still sustained in present time.
You are so right. Not only that when you look at the white crown and the blue you see the African hairstyle. ONLY long black people's hair goes into this shape. Even Queen Charlotte had her hair like this and it staid up because she was part black. No white persons hair does that without the black mixture, whether they know it or not.
@William Eaton Sorry The people who later invaded Egypt were Caucasian. NOT the original people. That is like saying , because Americans are majority Caucasian today, that dismisses the original population, the native Americans. Nice try.
@William Eaton He wasn't caucasian. The Ginger Mummy used Henna to dye his hair the same way as Ramses II. Only ignorant folks actually believe that Ginger was actually a ginger.
@CHAD An incel calling himself chad is kind of ironic isn't it? No, Most pharaohs were far from Caucasians and some did have red hair by henna. Red hair wasn't ever natural in Egypt unless the person was an immigrant. The ancient Egyptians never worshipped blue eyes. Most of the times their gods were drawn with black eyes. Where did you get that inaccurate information about lack of Subsaharan admixture? If it's from the 2017 DNA study you're really out of your depth here because that DNA study is considered heavily flawed and inconclusive.
PT3. The three ships were sailing toward the royal palace. One of the ships carried a lion - perhaps a deity. The central boat carries the king, sitting and equipped with long robe, flail and White Crown. All motifs that would later become symbols of Pharaonic rule in Egypt. This piece had been made no later than 3400 B.C. At that early date, there were not supposed to have been any such things as pharaohs or pharaohs' palaces.
They proved the Egyptians weren't white, Arab, east Indian or native American. Then after that they tried to say they were aliens 😂 like damn that's some racism, they don't want to give black people the credit so much that they said the Egyptians came from another planet 😂😂😂
@@ntsikashembe4773 The Egyptians, Persians, Arabs, Babylonians, Assyrians, Syrians and Phoenicians, the peoples of the Near East, are of one origin and have shared civilization in the past. It is unfortunate that the features of this civilization do not persist, but their peoples still exist, they have no relation to Europe, Egypt is a point of connection to Asia with Africa and no reasonable person can connect it Nigeria or Ghana,
@@ahmedelmogy2804 you're right, except that Egypt only has ancestral origins with cushites berbers semites and other afroasiatic people, persians had no genetic or linguistic relation to Egypt or even an ancestral archeological relation
15:49 the stone work from this period was better than stonework of later periods. You see how these clearly turned on a lathe, and cut by what could have ONLY BEEN A LASER of outrageous heat! Ah, yes I see that. It’s weird though how other pottery from that same time period looks to have been done by children in kindergarten. But... I suppose not everyone could afford lasers back then.
This was because ancient Egypt in pre-pre dynastic ancient times was technologically more advanced that we are today. Egyptologists would never mention that because it was all done by black people. They used machines more advanced than what we used today to carve statues with mathematical precision 100 percent more accurate in measurements than anything the top 5 countries in the UN today can hope you achieve if they pulled resources
PT2. The Twa and Hutu have history spanning 400,000+ years. Considering the very short period of time the western world, as we know it, has been around I would call this more than a than a civilization.
During the seventh century the Arabs invaded North Africa three times, bringing not just a new religion but a language and customs that were alien to the native Berber tribes of the Sahara and Mediterranean hinterland.
@@maryamelb4918 10, 000 year old iberomaurusian dna proves 1/3 sub Saharan African. The link has always been there. Hence, the term, Afroasiatic. Not, only that, but the Levant was not homogeneous. There were 2 groups of Levantine peoples, one of which definitely had sub-Saharan lineage and went south and eastward into Africa and South East Asia, while the other group went north, eventually into Europe. I believe our ancestors actually got this one right; modern man began in the Middle East, not Africa. And, if I’m not mistaken some indigenous African tribes have an oral history of coming from the north and settling in the south. Go look at the Andamanese. The last time I checked, they had no African genes, but could easily be mistaken as African. However, they’ve been in South East Asia since forever…
You can't compress history and tell your version of their story using your history as a template. They were smarter by leaps and bounds than we are today not the reverse. They were black people not Egyptian, until given that name.
PT2. Cemetery L at Qustul, which is a small cemetery containing unusually large and wealthy tombs of A-Group. It was in one of these graves, "L-24" coded by the excavators, that the mysterious incense burner came to light. An incense burner with figures and pictographs gouged deep into the clay. This censer had been found, not in Egypt, but nearly 200 miles deep in Nubia. The inscription showed three ships sailing in procession.
Nubia straddled both parts of Upper Egypt and parts of Lower Kush so parts of Nubia were in Egypt and parts in Kush. Therefore there were Egyptians who were Nubian and Kushites who were Nubian.
Isn't taking these items from the tombs raiding and robbing?? I know they are very old, and it's done for educational purposes, but if anyone else tried to take these items, they'd charge them with a serious crime. When they do it for educational purposes, it's ok though. An interesting double standard. Where did these ancient Egyptians come from?? Did they migrate, or were they always there?? If they were always there, then how long was that?? I think the history of mankind goes back much farther than we've been told. Take a look at that really old black vessel with the triangular bottom stand. That is masterful work, and it means they had to have sophisticated machinery, The block thing she showed would never be able to hollow out that vessel like that. It had to be made by some other type of machinery that revolved.That vessel would have to be perfectly balanced in order to stand. It's so perfect, we can assume they were making that type of vessel for a very long time. It doesn't look like the work of a beginner. The artifacts do prove that mass murder in the form of ritualistic human sacrifice for the King, or "Gods", or whatever was very much in full swing, even thousands of years before Christ, which indicates that there is just something inherent in the human beings that predisposes us to mass murder, and murderous rituals. It's not a modern condition in any way, shape, or form, but we sure have mastered the art over the centuries. It's never been easier to commit genocide than it is right now. It's easy because nobody even cares.
Yes that"s true they digging up scared sites for there own purposes. That goes to say the mindset these people have.it is a crime and they are not getting away from it.the ancestors are getting angry.they will pay for thay
PT1. As I've already stated, the Africans had already mapped the constellations, calculated the distances between stars, built the pyramids in line with these calculations, calculated that a day was comprised of a 24 hour time period and a year was 365 and 1/4 days with a true leap year felling every 1,460 years. In the field of medicine Homer said “in medicine, Kemet leaves the rest of the world behind.” ~ Book 4 of The Odyssey. Hippocrates himself described Imhotep the God of medicine.
Just because it says African does not mean it refers to black Africa. There is a group called the northern or sub saharan Africans. They are not black. Kemet does not refer to black Egyptians and Imhotep (probably Yosef of the Hebrews) was never referred to as a black man. Yosef himself was a 3rd generation Sumerian immigrant to what is now Judea and Samaria. The Pharaohs who were generational with the Hebrews in Egypt were the ruling elites who were in kinship with the Hittites who also were in kinship with the Hebrews. Sarah and Rebecca came from that tribe. Possible origin were by Gobekli Tepi builders, them selves probably survivors of a catastrophe.
@@jmjjim819 'Just because it says African , does not mean it refers to black Africa'...So now there's Black and White Africa? The same way I assume there's Black and White Europe....What utter nonsense...
@@jeanmusamba8448 look at the sphinx. African features look at all the statues and blacks everywhere on the walls. 8m just saying no racial bias I love everyone just saying common sense
@@TobeornottooB Basically the tablets had been on loan to the University of Chicago from the Iranian government since 1933. The Iranians wanted a set back. In 2004 or 2005 University of Chicago was going to give them back as they had been doing but the US government tried to seize them and sell them at auction to compensate Israel or Israeli victims of Hamas attacks that happened back in that late 1990's. The University and Iran sued the US government withthe case going all the way up to the supreme court finally ending in 2018 with the Supreme Court ruling in favor of UC and the Iranian government.
Note to everyone reading this: don't bother reading the comments on this video unless you want to lose some brain cells. Please enjoy the lecture from the Oriental Institute
morgana very good revision on egypt history. The pottery works were not just simple works it were carried out by royal workshops as potterys werent just used as utensils like we do today but these beautifully carved clays also had religious cultural values & would have been used in many ritualistic events, every art work had some significance which tells you the purpose it was meant for so great piece of works
The video didn't in any way address the title of the video. I watched the whole thing and I still don't know what she is telling me the origin of ancient Egyptian civilization is
They know the Nubians are the origin of the Egyptian civilization, they just hate to give black Africans credit for anything because it goes against their white washed BS
World Book Encyclopedia Copyright 1979 describe the ancient Egyptians as "Black Haired, DARK skinned.....belonging to the European geographic race. Plenty of holes in the European description...1st Europeans are pale "white" in body area where skin is not exposed to sunlight. One has to ask where did ancient Egypt dark skin come from? Not Europe. Second, As outsiders came in and mixed the complexion of the population lighten, just like enslaved black Americans. Conclusion the ancient Egyptians population complexions was darker than the people we see in Cairo today and more like the complexions of the Nubians in Lower Egypt.
I had the pleasure of meeting Emily about 1981. I found her gracious and very helpful in assisting me with some design questions found on Egyptian jewelry.
Well put, I agree with you. It is a miserable waste. I occasionally make mistakes with attempting to encourage others to remain teachable when I should just observe instead of judging. Thanks for this.
Introduction guy: yes, you're funny. Yes, you're cute. But not five minutes worth of cute. (lecture starts at 5:15)
LOL! That was funny!
Thank you..
Thank you!
Thanks for heads up
Thanks
13:10 It's amazing how they zoom in on the boats on the pottery but not the depictions of the people on the pottery. They do this all the time.
We all know why
@@kamose6123 ANCIENT ALIENS :D :D :D LOLOLOL
@@kamose6123 is it because you want to claim they look 'african'
@@nerome619 it is bc they were African.
@nerome619 Africa has a variation of skin tones. The problem is that uneducated people routinely equate the "African look" to dark skin.
I just saw something that blew my mind. In this video, when she shows the paintings in the bottom of the statue they are exactly the same than those on the Qustul incense burner found in nubia. Wow.
Only Tell The story that s Fits there Bullshit
what a stupid ignorant
@@rykson161
Thanks for saving my time. I'm always interested if they will tell the truth.
KHO0OL .. yeah but she is a member of the Guilty European Class Holding Onto Everything . #GECHOE
Isn't Egypt IN Africa? So... Idk. Wtvr. They were who they were. Whatever the color of their skin.
Why make it a racist issue now? Is SHE doing that? I can't imagine why she would. What difference does it make?
If people didn't always draw attention to it, it wouldn't exist.
Just look at little kids. They don't give a shit. They just accept everyone all the same until someone makes them aware of it.
We are all in this together. Stop making a big deal out of it and it will go away.
Kids don't know racism until someone shows it to them.
Isn't the end goal to make it go away? Can't make it go away unless we stop pointing it out.
What a waste of time.
The people of this region called themselves Kemites, not Egyptians. Egypt is a Greek word. The period of antiquity she speaks of had a heavy Nubian or sub-Saharan influence.
The athropormorphic images like Horus, Thoth, and others were not Gods, but philosophical principles to live by. They were called Neters (nature). Thoth, for example, represented thought, writting, mathematics and other ideas.
The main deified concept that Egyptologist avoid is the "Amen" (The unseen one). This is a Kemetic word used to acknowledge the creator of all things. There are too many loose ends in Egyptology that make it difficult to tie everything together without doing your own research. Much of it is intentional.
Europe is an Roman ideal. The Romans were Grecophile. Hence the choice in naming. If the lady were an African. Maybe then she'd say Kemite. She said nothing wrong in that respect. Europeans call the archetype's Gods.
Modern Catholics, American Christians, Mormons & Muslims think of a God as an actual being. The higher cultured people's around the world, see religion as astronomy / ology archetypes.
@@Nubian_Traveller There are those who are either ignorant or are In denial.
African culture thrived for thousands of years before its history was interrupted by barbaric culture vultures. This is not hypothesis, its fact!
The origins of philosophy, science and the arts began with the Nubian. They were the first to walk upright and have thought. The original Homosapien Sapien.
There are white washed versions of African consciousness throughout western culture. From classical music, the eye of Horus and the Pyramid on the back of the US dollar bill to the obelisk in Vatican Square and the Washington monument. The movies of African Queens and Pharoahs are always white.
It's absolutly about color. If one is speaking about ancient Kemet, they are talking about color. Kemet means: The land of the blacks. Egyptologist avoid that name because of its definition. The fact that she didn't mention color is a coded attempt to deceive by assuming its implied.
@@JazzEnthusiast very well put,I read on another board that someone trying to say that people of Uganda were Caucasian. Lol and that these people built kemet. So I guest some of these people came from ta-seti.
@@ta-setiwarrior1848 yeah, then painted black people all over the temple walls and knocked the noses off of their sculptures. Riiiiiight! Pure trumpery.
@Nick Nack
If one calls any place in the east "ancient Egypt" . they are hiding the truth or don't know the real history.
Egypt , in the beginning, is Alkebulan , it is the entire middle east that includes Iraq , Iran , Syria , Israel , India , just to name a few .
The original Alkebulan people were black and the land were ruled by 18 dynastic Kings and Queens that were killed along with 50 million original Jews.
The biblical book "Exodus" is directly talking about the mass exodus of the people that left the region to escape the slaughter.
If they want to talk about the "Egyptian culture" , you must start with the people who were there in Alkebulan and what happened to them before the lines in the sands were drawn.
So ... They are talking about black History , not Egyptian history !
Truth
Interesting that she admits that the early stonework is of a much higher quality than the later works. Yet she, and the entire scholarly community, offer no cogent explanations as to why that is.
She didn't say stone work. She said pottery. And things change. You think a cup made by an Irish person in 1800 is the same as a pot in 2021. I don't think so. And she's talking about a culture that spanned thousands of years. And when things are mass produced they change. We know that now from when we would sow our own clothes. Now we get everything mass produced from China.
craftsmen ship gets worse with time
@@lobo1928 so does that mean at the beginning your an expert? Rookiea are experts? Cuz thats what happened in egypt .. this women is clueless and a liar
@@marceloorellana5726 sorry but she did say stonework , you obviously misheard because it Is stonework.
@@lobo1928 Yeah? Would you like to trade in your current phone for a 1st generation iPhone then?
I always enjoy listening to Dr. Teeter. Thank you for making this available.
I think I missed the part about the origins of Egyptian Civilization.
You mentioned the earlier artifacts were more intricate than the following atrifacts, is that something to make you wonder if the same civilazation was present or another one
good point. I came here to find out who they were. thats not what I got.
YOU PEOPLE ARE STUPID BEYOND BELIEF. THE SAME WITH THE ANCIENT ROMANS - LATER WORKS WERE NOT AS WELL MADE.
@@hankrogers8431 cause they were invaded by Persian and then Arabs
Happens in many cultures, even ours. Take a look at the original Penn station in New York, marble and travertine work of art that was torn down for the ugly, squat concrete and steel version now...
@@sudanfunny Centuries after these artifacts, and even then that has had a very small impact on the Egyptian gene pool.
Listening to Dr. Teeter's lecture, one would think that the origin of Egyptian civilization came from their pottery. She went through more than 40 minutes without once mentioning the people. It's almost painful to hear the deliberate circumnavigation of the people except for the subtle mention of the role that the northern kingdom played in the formation of Egyptian culture. Absolutely no mention of The Nabta Playa: th-cam.com/video/snjXEM1ZgBY/w-d-xo.html
I understand the desire for more narrative driven history but if that's what you're after, just watch a different video. There's plenty of videos on the Pharaohs and everyday life of Egyptians citizens. But the pottery and other material remains are the only reason we know anything about those people in the first place. The fact you think she didn't mention the people at all throughout this video just tells me that you shouldn't be engaging with this type of historical analysis because it was the people who made that pottery. That's the whole point of the lecture. Seeing what information we can gather through the examination of material remains.
@@IreliAmBad if you think that pottery is the main reason we know anything about Egyptian civilization you're sadly mistaken. So much of what we know of ancient Egypt is due to the preponderance of evidence found on the temples, pyramids, tombs papyri, ancient texts written by foreigners traveling and/or studying in Egypt, linguistic structure and culture and "religion" and the culture of the other nearby civilizations ie Kush and Axum.
@@iayyam I was talking about material remains in general. Pottery was just the example the OP used. My point was that, if you're more into the study of people, that's totally legitimate. But to criticize this lecture due to a lack of a character-centric focus, just came across as rude and a little naive. Expecially when OP framed it as "deliberate circumnavigation." Written sources are obviously invaluable to the study of history but without the intense analysis of material remains to coroberate the sources claims, there's very little a historian can definitively extrapolate from it. That all being said, I shouldn't have said "pottery is the only reason we know about those people". I should have said "material remains such as pottery are the only reason we know about those people"
@@IreliAmBad @IreliAmBad Thanks for directing my academic interests but I'm old enough to make my own choices. My problem with Dr. Teeter's lecture has nothing to do with the subject matter that she chose to explore - I learned some things - but that she never seem to discuss the people who created the civilization in a lecture with the grandiose title "Origins of Egyptian Civilization". Not a big leap.
“…communities in Upper Egypt began to coalesce into three regional groupings....Strategic factors help to explain the early dominance of these three prehistoric kingdoms. One kingdom was centered on the town of Tjeni (near modern Girga), a site where the floodplain narrowed and allowed the town’s inhabitants to control river traffic. This area was also where trade routes from Nubia and the Saharan oases met the Nile Valley. A second territory had its capital at Nubt (the golden,” modern Nagada). Which controlled access to gold mines in the Eastern Desert via the Wadi Hammamats on the opposite bank of the river. A third kingdom had grown up around the settlement of Nekhen, which like Tjeni, was the starting point of a desert route to the oases (and then to Sudan) and, like Nubt, controlled access to important Eastern Desert gold reserves, in this case the more southernly deposits reached via a wadi directly opposite the town.” Dr. Toby Wilkinson
PT3. The first University in Europe was the University in Salamanca in Spain, built by African. Not only the bricks that built the building were put up by Africans but the educational curriculum was a direct copy of that taught at the University of Djenne in Ghana, which was itself burnt down and later rebuilt as the University of Sankore in Timbuktu. That whole euro-centric 'sub-Sahara' BS is the weakest nonsense you can hear from ones who know nothing of their own history, let alone Africa.
Thank you for those corrections.
Well.that bollocks but thanks for the "everything started in Africa" BS.
Africa been a backwater since the Egypt was eclipsed, apart from the flowering of Islamic thought around the turn of the 1st millenia. That flowering was based almost entirely on what came out of Greece and the Middle East and didn't last long once that learning found its way back to the West.
Nice try though. Next you'll be telling us that the NASA space programme originated in the Congo and space rockets were actually built in the African jungles.
@@Telcontar1962 you sound like a racist ass. It's not us that tell you that but your countrymen..you sound like a damn cave man mad at history..you in your racist little head may think Africa was a back water but to the contrary Africans did build schools in Europe..this is all written knowledge and because you don't like it doesn't change it..Even the first Europeans were from Black Africa just like Cheddar Man..keep your hate we are interested in real history and knowledge..people like you is what makes this world the hateful place it is. Racist ass..
PT2...which is followed for about 1,000 years by predominately African types. Pyramid building, mummification, the deities that were to build the pantheon of Gods of the Egyptians, all the religious, political, and scientific traditions that were to make classical Egypt the beginnings of the Pharaohonic period is found in Nubia at Qustul 200 years before it even begins to take a shape and to be carried forward into Egypt.
The audio needs fixing in this production, apart from scaring the hell out of me the spikes damage tweeters
Imagine asking white people for for native american or african history...
MuhammadAli_GOAT They don’t know 99% of nothing but lies that they made up
But blacks seem to think they know White history so much though.
Imagine being shit brained. Oh wait you don’t have to imagine that, you’re ur it!
Smooth Criminal smooth criminal. more like smooth brain
Truth Seeker don’t respond to idiots
Maybe I missed it, but were there any pictures or depictions of the people who made these artifacts?
Heute würde man sie mit einer Maschine machen, ich glaube es war auch früher so.
The pharaohs came from the land of gods, ancestors ,the land of Punt located in Somali territory and we found recently many ancient pharaonic kings from Punt .
"Encyclopædia Britannica describes Punt as follows: “in ancient Egyptian and Greek geography, the southern coast of the Red Sea and adjacent coasts of the Gulf of Aden, corresponding to modern coastal Eritrea, Somalia and Djibouti ."/
In “The Making of Egypt” (1939). Petrie states that the Land of Punt was “sacred to the Egyptians as the source of their race.”
« Again the representations of the early Puntites, or Somali people, on the Egyptian monuments, show striking resemblances to the Egyptians themselves. » By Brian Brown New York: Brentano's[1923]
If that's true we are gods. Punt is the Great Rift Valley. Humans evolved in the Rift Valley of East Africa.
+Zenme Yangzi Then show us the culture,language & science before Kemet ...even after show us
You will only find this evidence in Africa starting further south even the Kemetu said they came from the south.
Bantu,Wolof,Asante,Yoruba, to name just a few all show continuity in the culture and linguistics after Kemet
Case closed!
Your the only fool talking myths I have you clear info on the ground foh
Fool
+Zenme Yangzi These morons are unable to face that they are wrong. There is too many of these idiots going around claiming that "African" Americans Descended from Ancient Egyptian pharaoh's.
Kind of like how the Nazi's claimed that the white blue eyed Germans descended from the 'Aryan "master" race'..
Anything to justify their racism and hatred of others.
Just like these black "khemits" who want to feel superior to white people and other races based on this ideology they have made up.
It's sad how many forms racism takes... sad shit...
+Zenme Yangzi LOL!!! >>> "E-M78 is a west european clade" <<< LOL!!! M78 DOES NOT originate in Western "europe"...although it is dominant there. Remember the E in E-M78. The E haplogroup is African
Retard...don't you know that M78 is an offshoot of V68...which is an offshoot of M243...which is an offshoot of the parent M215...E1b1b. M78 IS NOT "caucasian DNA".
Now...the FACTS...as told by "whites" about themselves, in regard to genetics, haplogroups, SNP's, etc.
"Haplogroup E1b1b (formerly known as E3b) represents the last major direct migration from Africa into Europe. It is believed to have first appeared in the Horn of Africa approximately 26,000 years ago and dispersed to North Africa and the Near East during the late Paleolithic and Mesolithic periods. E1b1b lineages are closely linked to the diffusion of Afroasiatic languages."
www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_E1b1b_Y-DNA.shtml
"Late glacial migration of E-M78 to Mediterranean EuropeIt is still unclear when haplogroup E first entered Europe. The earliest known prehistoric sample to date is an E-V13 from Catalonia dating from 5000 BCE. So we know for sure that E1b1b was present in southern Europe at least since the Early Neolithic. Nonetheless, the possibility of other migrations of E1b1b to southern Europe during the Mesolithic or Late Palaeolithic cannot be ruled out. It is highly probable that the E-M78 subclade, found at relatively high frequencies in Mediterranean Africa, especially in Egypt (45% of the population) migrated to southern Europe before Neolithic herders from the Cardium Pottery culture arrived."
These are essentially Black people...genetically...although with admixture
15:15 That design reminds me of a hide shield -- compare the typical Zulu style shield, animal hide with a long stick in the middle, protruding at the bottom and decorated with some sort of tuft at the top. Or even those big Medieval European duelling shields that you rested on the ground.
Don't mention Zulu with Egypt, the racist will kill you.
Just a hypothesis, if the level of art in Egypt has been such since the dawn of their civilization and continued on thru the next millenia with the same compelling consistency as Ms. Teeter suggests, then what happened in the pre- and post-Ptolemaic (Cleopatra) Dynasty? Are they still the same ancient ethnic group or is it that the Mayan enigma happened to the original ethnic Egyptian? Where is the ancient race? I'm sure Zahi Hawas and Hosni Mubarak aren't one of them lol. Any answers?
Who knows if you're even alive anymore, but the answer is simple: the ancient Egyptians are the modern Egyptians. Their gene pool is just a little different (and only a _little_ different) from all the foreign invasions throughout their history. The Arab invasions displaced their leadership - but it was never going to displace the native population of one of the most densely populated regions of antiquity; and modern Egyptian peasants, particularly the Copts, still carry out many traditions that can be traced back to ancient Egypt, and even some elements of their language, calendar, &c.
In regard to Cleopatra/the Ptolemies, who were Greek, they actually married into the high Roman aristocracy through descent from the children of Cleopatra with Marc Antony, and from there into the royalty & nobility of much of the ancient Mediterranean. Apparently, Queen Zenobia, who rebelled against Rome with her breakaway Palmyrene Empire during the Crisis of the Third Century, was a descendant of Cleopatra. After the capture of Zenobia & her children, they lived in a villa near Rome granted them by Emperor Aurelian; but after that, the trail in history goes cold. Most likely some noble Italian families are their distant descendants.
@18:53 in sudan they still use beer vessel to drink water from the vessel are used for the public to drink water from. Looks exactly same as in photo
so would it be safe to assume that 3,000 years from now we will still be dependent on fossil fuels, still drawing the same cartoons?
She talks about digging in the north/south of egypt? You already did dig in europe?
What did you find in Europe? What did you find in Greece (nothing)?
@Micheal Hnat they would just find more Black people (in Europe). Like the Grimaldi or Aurignacian people. White people are indigenous to NOWHERE. Not even Europe... hence their need to claim everyone else's heritage....
@@moosieh1By depictions, Sculptures, mummies and Anthropology we know Egyptians
weren't black
Only black Egyptians known in history were not even Egyptians but a
Nubian Dynasty that conquered Egypt lead by King Kashta in
Approximately the year 750 BC. Six Cushite Pharaohs took over until
they were defeated. This Cushite Dynasty was defeated by the Assyrians
and the real Egyptians were restored to power.
Don't waste your time. If you want to skip the intro, this starts at 5 minutes in.
Much appreciated.
Thx
Thank you anonymous internet user...
Your small contribution.. to this videos comment section... has improved mine and others viewing experience...
I wish only that... it were possible for there to be someone as considerate as yourself... in every comment section..
I will now enjoy this video... minus the irrelevant introduction of the speaker... thanks to your maintenance of the internet..
I onc
thanks
The images she references at min 6:30 to 7mins are most likely representations of constellations, the first Ophiuchus and the second Hercules.
Was that a lama in 5000 year old Egyptian art? Does anyone get that?
“We came from the beginning of the Nile, where God Hapi dwells at the foothills of the mountain of the moon.” From the Papyrus of Hunefer.
dogrose van tsetse What specific country is that
MJafro Uganda...
True! Which is in Uganda.
Sure
the blue eyed gene comes from africa by the way
❤️ modern society is poison.
If any of this is based on rigor, it's certainly not being conveyed. I'm much more interested in how they come to know any of these claims, than merely a handful of fun facts. Take just about any claim she's made and apply it to modern or even better documented historically eras. You realize such a simple claim would only capture a small segment of the population and certainly not build any over-arching narrative for even that sub-culture. Spirals being whimsical recreations of the stones patter? Or maybe just someone being creative with patterning. Absolutely no effort to convey the rigor behind the claims.
All of this video is about blacks , there were no Egypt during the 1st , 2nd , 3rd and so on .
18 dynastic rules of black Kings and Queens as there was no place by the name of Egypt.
But the region where Egypt is back then is still the same today just because it wasn’t called Egypt doesn’t mean it wasn’t egypt. Africa wasn’t called Africa back then but we still use the history of Africa back then and use the name Africa for it . Name doesn’t matter it’s still in the same region and place.
True according to to every graph that every ancient Egyptians weren't black yet some graphs shows black pharohs and minister and workers as well and majority of ancient egyptian were dark brown and light brown for women yet some graphs shows light and white skin ppl even blond people .the origins of egyptian is north africans (brown people) but since Egypt had many wars and relationships through the years it was mixed with other races but not too much as for now egyptian are 5%european 18%arab and 87% north africans as you can see in the modern egyptian the similarities in skin and hair and after all as an Egyptian i don't give a fuck about neither did the ancient egyptian so even if we were green it really means nothing for any of you as long as you aren't egyptian have great life
@@mariamdiallo6420
Egypt is Afrika , they drew lines in the sands to make it less obvious who was there before Rome (evil) arrived.
Goggle the word EGYPT and you will know who the people were in the beginning.
Afrika is spelled just this way, they changed it ( England) , Enlarged is Rome.
Afrikanus was the leader of the army out of Rome that invaded a place originally known as Alkebulan.
Rome killed over 50 million original Jews who God called Israel.
Israel is not a place on your map as historians will have you to believe, Israel is a people that consisted of 12 tribes.
Afrikanus renamed the place (Alkebulan) after himself as he thought his slaughtering was a good things.
Alkebulan was ruled by 18 dynastic kings and queens that were black and they tried to hide this fact by defacing all the statues in the land , even the sphinx in Giza.
You much come to a poibt of realization that the lies were to hide the fact of who the people were.
The slaughter of 50 million Original black Jews were atrocious and the survivors left out of the East in a mass exodus and the book of Exodus in your bible is about this event.
The survivors are those who Columbus discovered in a land now known as America , they were black and they are ISRAEL.
They, like the bible says , were enslaved for 400 years and because of who they were to God , had suffered just as Christ suffered.
They were whipped and also hung from a tree, just as Christ was.
We are here, we were first in the garden and satan took every effort to keep Israel nound up in bondage, enslaved to his ways.
Still to this day, the bloodline of israel (black and brown) are hated because God called them his children and they are the blessed one's.
There's so much you don't know or don't want to know because it would decimate the church as you have come to know it, if the trith was known.
Christ was a black man from the bloodline of the first man to be formed , Christ was black.
No mention of Khemit? and their power tools
We also learn that the Pyramids of Nubia, located to the South of Egypt are far older than the Pyramids found in the North. Likewise, the Metu Neter is much older and many of the scripts found furthest South have not been ciphered by main stream Egyptologist. We find that the Ancient Nubians migrated further North along the Nile, building Civilizations and Temples, practicing the Mysteries of the Universe. We see such ancient mysteries among the Dogon and many other Tribes.
that is most simply not true the pyramids in Sudan are from 8th century BCE on all they are more plentiful there is nothing on the scale that you find at Giza
The llies people tell themselves. The pyramids of Nubia are older than the Egyptian pyramids by hundreds of years
🥱
@@markb43752000 no you’re talking about different thing those pyramids that were built from the 8th century BCE to 400AD were also built by native Egyptians to honour their ancestors who had live and ruled kemet. He’s talking about different pyramids.
the Nubia(lower Nubia/upper Nubia m) of the ancient times was not an ethnic marker, but a region bounded by the first and sixth cataracts of the river Iteru (Nile). The name of a non-Egyptian kingdom south of Nubia is “Kush". 3 out of the forty-two traditional administrative divisions of ancient Egypt were located in ancient Nubia, and that part of Nubia was not considered as part of Kush. Kush conquered Nubia at the end of the old kingdom for(700 years), Nubia was retaken during the new kingdom hence why you see Kushites in captivity. The word “Nubia” wasn’t even employed until the late Roman era.
Its true, if something is not mainstream, nobody gives it a second thought, even when there is a mountain of evidence to support it.
Humans are funny.
Vor allem die Pyramiden sind Technologie, die jeder Seismologe ohne Zweifel erkennt, aber niemand frägt einen. Ein Experiment, das die Funktion auch heute noch beweist, könnte für ein Erdbeben in der Wissenschaft und den Religionen sorgen.
All these an isn't sites held black or blackness in the highest regard yet people still claim these places didn't not begin with black people its amazing to me, the Gods were Black, I don't know that people would paint their god black if they weren't highly respected and indeed black, I mean look how hard it is non black people to accept the Egyptians being Black, how much harder would it be for people to accept their god as black.
I hate the amount of guesswork that goes on. She clearly doesn't know how or why about most of this stuff. Just say you don't know, don't make stupid guesses.
40 minutes in and still not saying, again where are the So Called Egyptian Come From.....by the way there's no such thing as an ancient Egyptian.....
The world history is wrong they take egypt from Africa to asia🤔🖕 the come from land of punt(somalia)
Abdullahi Abshir you wuz kangz
@@mimigheith263 thank you for noticing
Why can't she just say they were Africans with an African culture. That's what her evidence shows.
lol ain't it a shame that the whole timeline has turned out to be complete and utter bullshit?
how are you guys liking the hole you been digging?
+Davey Jones so so right
+Davey Jones Yes - hopefully they'll keep digging and we'll never have to hear another word of this lunacy
The Ancient Egyptians were NOT black Africans so just STOP!
@@hankrogers8431 Napta Playa
@@hankrogers8431 they where not white Europeans
They are talking about Phyrimads? European Phyrimads? Oriental ?
I like how Europeans like speaking on the culture in Kemet and they pick and chose what they want to expose and try to put themselves in there. Lady, how can u speak on a peoples culture when yours is marded with evil and make-believe?
Wtf are you talking about?
The Ancient Kemetic/Egyptian Civilization and Culture began in the South of Africa, near Uganda. The earliest form of Metu Neter or Hieroglyphics originated in the South of the Nile Valley. We learn from the natives themselves, which states that, "We come from the beginning of the Nile, where the God Hapi dwells..." We learn from the Greeks themselves that the Egyptians were a black race of people. See Herodotus, Aristotle, Manetho, Count DeVolney, Albert Churchward, Gerald Massey, Budge, etc.
winston morris - Herodotus didn't say that the Egyptians were a black people. Here is what he did say.
Book 2
22. The third of the ways is much the most specious, but nevertheless it is the most mistaken of all: for indeed this way has no more truth in it than the rest, alleging as it does that the Nile flows from melting snow; whereas it flows out of Libya through the midst of the Ethiopians, and so comes out into Egypt. How then should it flow from snow, when it flows from the hottest parts to those which are cooler? And indeed most of the facts are such as to convince a man (one at least who is capable of reasoning about such matters), that it is not at all likely that it flows from snow. 29 The first and greatest evidence is afforded by the winds, which blow hot from these regions; the second is that the land is rainless always and without frost, whereas after snow has fallen rain must necessarily come within five days, so that if it snowed in those parts rain would fall there; the third evidence is afforded by the people dwelling there, who are of a black colour by reason of the burning heat. Moreover kites and swallows remain there through the year and do not leave the land; and cranes flying from the cold weather which comes on in the region of Scythia come regularly to these parts for wintering: if then it snowed ever so little in that land through which the Nile flows and in which it has its rise, none of these things would take place, as necessity compels us to admit.
As you can see Herodotus was talking about the source of the Nile and the colour of the people who lived. He was not talking about the Egyptians.
@@fredgillespie5855 well the Nile is Egypt that makes the nubian also. ,you all didn't expect brown/re-branded black people to wake from the deep sleep, well we are wide awake and we are taking back our history.
@@marciabryce1379 he is ignoring the word "ethiopians" which in ancient times was used to describe black people.
Wow. This was uploaded in 2011, so I wonder how much has happened in the field, literally and figuratively, since then. I am obsessed with Neolithic developments around the world.
I think of the world as the diaspora of North Africa and the Middle East particularly with regard to culture, which for me is far more interesting that the genetic story (as I have always assumed that we are all related, rooted in the Cradle/Horn region of the world.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE "Middle East ", the term was concocted by Queen Victoria's foreign ministers and is a Geopolitical confection,the term you seek is the Levant,
Could you imagine if the Neanderthal tribes that became Europe and the early tribes of Ancient Greece did not make it out of the ice age...we would have a full technologically developed African empire....and clean water
Brother, you let that Black Panther comic-book fantasy movie fuck with your mind. The people that settled Europe were adventurous, curious men and women who were smart enough to get the hell out of that shit-hole you're so proud of and ventured many thousands of miles to establish a whole new continent where they flourished and emerged as world explorers, conquerers, city-builders and sea-farers. All this while you stayed put, burned out early, retreated to your mud-huts and dreamed about being a great civilization...and for the most part, remained in your mud-huts to this very day.
I mean, think about it, blaming neanderthals for your failures is pretty fuckin' weak. Jus' sayin'.
Was that really before the pyramids? I don't think so..... 3800 BC?
+Lana Benson I agree.
Why not? Egypt didn't start out with pyramids.
Zeupater The pyramis are much older than 3600 BC.
do not read the comments
hahahaha
thanks to you and Tobias for the advice, really helpful
😅😅
Fair advice?
MY DAD ONCE SAID TO ME.....:" This is His Story.. Now let me show you yours..."
+Kevin doss so he told you his story?
That's right. And now I can make my own choice in which to believe. Many hear only a one side story from K to College. I was fortunate to hear 2 sides to the story!
Beer jar? Not a very practical design for keeping your brewski upright!
What came first? Sumerian Cuneiform isn't writing.?
7 minutes into this and I'm already questioning the end.
Once you start listening, you quickly realis that she's just making it up!!!
+phard2345 Yes, it's like listening to a five year old tell her make believe story - she is insane and she doesn't realize it and apparently neither does any one else in the audience - including the "scholars".
Whirled Publishing Just goes to show how far down the rabbit whole we are!
+phard2345 These lunatics believe the lie that the old maps are "inaccurate" - actually the old maps reveal hundreds of truths. Did you know Libya dominated all of Africa before Egypt was ever thought of? Libya was named after a "god" - so was Egypt - and Europe - and Asia. Of course, all these "gods" were just figments of the imagination of the "primitive cave dwellers" who were slicing mountains into giant boulders, transporting the megaliths long distances and erecting them into geometrically-precise positions - all around the world - Latin America, Africa, Greece, Rome, the Middle East, all across Asia, etc.
Curiously, North America does not have one elaborate megalithic site - because it was covered by "an ice age" - wrong again. North America was covered by sea water.
The lies from these "experts" are never-ending.
If the experts had the answers, would the world be in such a mess?
The experts are idiotic impostors, propped up by the same parasites that control our political system, our economic system, our justice system, healthcare system, education system, scientific paradigms and theories, peer review, the military, the history and the historical timeline - these parasitic hybrid evil incarnates look human but they are not human - hook one of them up to an EEG and the brainwave pattern is so bizarre it does not appear human - because they are not human. They look human because of the influx of human DNA down through the generations but they are devoid of compassion, empathy, guilt, remorse and love - because they are not human.
These parasites siphon trillions of dollars off our economy every year so they can live like royalty while posing as our leaders.
Humans are poisoned, drugged, numbed and programmed into oblivion. Few people realize the truth.
The evil incarnate parasites and their fake "experts" desperately exploit others because they are empty inside.
No one who feels love, peace and happiness wastes their time seeking social status and wealth.
Even the University of Chicago - prestigious as it is - hosts this garbage.
Check the IQ's of your "experts" before you put 'em on a pedestal.
Thank you for your reply.
I wonder if ppl gave jars of things to the deceased to take with them or something. Bc of course, its not like youre dead and you pick out jars to offer to a god. They seem like some kind of gifts or offerings in respect of the dead to bury with them to be with them i their journey or something. Its interesting to dig up but also sad. I imagine many locals could contribute explanations.
THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST!!!!!!! THIS WAS ANCIENT AFRICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Those are lovely ancient Nubian pots, i.e., before the Egyptians. I don't know why they don't admit it by now. Too bad.
@@weldonclark8442 hoo shit preach.
Weldon Clark
Egyptians were not friends of Nigros
But enemies , read and learn who was who the evidence is irrefutable.
www.quora.com/How-did-the-ancient-Greeks-describe-the-appearance-of-the-Egyptians/answer/Majed-Ahmed-11?ch=10&share=1c620cbd&srid=5fNCq
@@weldonclark8442 Ah, very true. Almost all white people have some percentage of Neanderthal genes in them. As do Asians also, although there DNA contains that Asian Neanderthal gene. I was curious if that might explain the difference in IQ between Asians, Caucasians, and Sub-Saharan Africans. There is about a 3 IQ point difference between Asians and Caucasians, and then another 4 IQ points difference between Caucasians and Sub-Saharan Africans. As of yet it is completely unexplained as to why there would be such a drastic difference between those three groups. Personally, I am 6% victim, and am waiting for my payday.
@A liar!!;
@A how would you know since you are a cave dweller?
Before the Pyramids? Have they started carbon dating stone now? If I carve my initials into the Washington Monument today can we then assume that the monument was constructed today in my name?
Does it really matter what color they had? Doesn't matter if you're black, white, yellow or whatever if you think this is an issue you put way too much importance on race. Judging people based on that is just as stupid as judging people on what color of shirt they wear.
Best not to read any comment other than this one. ;-)
This comment should be pinned. This comment section is weird and depressing.
Yo the devil nearly caught me slipping. Big save. Total respect for that one bro ✌️
Can someone explain all the hate and weirdness in the comments?
The Sumerians called themselves sag-giga, meaning "the black-headed people" (W. Hallo, W. Simpson. The Ancient Near East. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1971, 28.) In numerous inscribed tablets, the Sumerians refer to themselves in this fashion. Not black-haired, but black-headed.
I'm only 10 minutes in, how is it you haven't mentioned, let's say, the serapeum at saqqara or the osirion? What about corundum pots turned on high technology lathes?.
Sorry but I really don't think you should be a university
Try not to be rude. It's not often this kind of info is seen or discussed. Use this opportunity to share and compare
Informative. However, I was expecting to hear about the geographic origins of the predynastic settlers, but the focus was mostly on material culture. I was also skeptical of some of the interpretations. For example, she sounds a little too confident when she declares an artisan or a royal was "showing off." We need more Africans in these spaces to gather and interpret the data.
We don’t need more “Africans” in these spaces. Ancient Egypt is part of all of our human heritage, and we need smart and qualified experts. The Ancient Egyptians didn’t look like you because Egypt is farther from the equator than your ancestors.
I totally agree. Europe is essential a juvenile delinquent yet it attempts to enlighten us on the most advanced civilization in human history. How? European scholars have a history or obscuring, distorting, omitting, and outright lying about History. Unfortunately her commentary and analysis simply cannot be trusted.
@@colinreese Egypt is in Africa so, yes, we need more Africans and fewer whites. Egyptology has a long history of racism that won't be fixed if we ignore disparities in funding and training both of which are rooted in imperialism. White people have enjoyed centuries of affirmative action. The ancient Egyptians were close enough to the equator to be dark complexioned. They certainly weren't "caucasian" as Merrick Posnansky insisted when I was a freshman at UCLA in the late 90s. This claim was also made by UCLA professor, Jared Diamond, in his award winning book, "Guns, Germs, and Steel" (i think its in chapter 11). Moreover, scientists believe that pale skin only evolved less than 12 kya.
@@kwamezulushabazz No one thinks the ancient Egyptians had blonde hair and light skin, so it’s false to claim that anyone thinks this. Europeans can have brown skin, which is probably lost on you. Dark complexioned doesn’t mean black. Black is Sub-Saharan African. White skin is 40,000 years old not 12,000 years old. Racism isn’t a white phenomenon, and disparities in funding and training aren’t due to racism. Anyone in the world can study Egyptology if they want to. You’re quite the racist. If you’re of West African or Sub-Saharan African origin, then the ancient Egyptians are not your ancestors. Your overall premise of “we need fewer whites” is quite racist and reveals your true motivation.
@@colinreese I didn't say dark = Black. The claim that the ancient Egyptians were Caucasian is a holdover from racists Egytologists. Anyone who denies the racist history of Egyptology is either delusional or dishonest. Google it and educate yourself. Most studies I have seen on skin color indicate that pale skin evolved less than 20 kya. White people and white scientists have had centuries of affirmative action. That's not an "agenda," it's a fact.
No wonder John Anthony West is so popular. If this is the state of Egyptological academia, then the whole thing is a big mess of a guess.
Another thing is if you read Manetho you would see that the Kushites/Ethiopians were enemies of the Pharoahs of Egypt. They would lead military campaigns against them. Then around 1800 BC a group of Semites known as the Hyksos took over Egypt and formed an alliance with Kushites to try to take over all Egypt. Both were driven out. The Hyksos are the Jews, Kushites are Blacks. Both were enemies to Egypt and forced out eventually.
25:20 is that a lama?
if it is...how the heck they knew llama in pre-dynastic era?
tornistan that’s a llama
Tartaria..
The Battlefield Palette (also known as the Vultures Palette, the *Giraffes* Palette, or the Lion Palette)
Llama's are from the new world (Americas) so, no, it is not.
The little ivory boy @ 24:00 min sums up the debate in regards who were the original Egyptians..100% MELANIN
Lol, exactly. Look at his Caucasian straight hair and Caucasian features. The truth is there!
It doesn't matter what any caucasoid has to say about my comment Europeans for all of history for everything that I can dig up a fine I've only travel with three things excuse me 4 missionaries first then domination death and destruction has been the European Credo for all of history and if anybody knows anything about history they know that
Most of Egypt's history was with Egyptians, Amazighs, Cushitics, Nilotics, And Sudanics
hhhh what a joke....this is pure African history son!! you came with invading ancestors.
You ignore today the old views that Egyptians had their origin in India.
Dipak Basu
They didn’t have there origin in India u idiot😂
They came from sub suharan Africa
Nature Lover
It’s true because all of the pharaohs in the old kingdom (pyramid builders) were black like sneferu, khafre, and khufu.
And Herodotus who came to Egypt in the 5th century bc said on first appearance the Egyptians had dark skin and wooly hair.
It was the Persians, assyrians, Greeks and romans who caused the genotype to change because they were occupying Egypt for the longest.
Look at it this way, in 1492, the Native American population in America was 60 million now in 2020 it has been reduced to 5 million in just 530 years unlike Egypt which has had ongoing foreign rulers after the old kingdom for 3,000 years. If you connect the dots you can see how similar it is to ancient Egyptian.
@Nature Lover Sorry,middle east and Med were in diapors during most of Egyptian civilization
there is no doubt that people we call today The ancient Egyptians or Khemetic/kmt people were Black Africans who moved this land of Egypt over 30-20,000 years ago according to the ancient zodiacal systems , most of their DNA code is which is (E1B1B1 ) is still live and well amongst the East Africans ( Sudan, Ethiopens and the Somalis )
Is an 'institute' one guy in a cluttered office, with an official letterhead?
When i hear 3000bc, well no need to listen any further , the great pyramid was built 25000 years ago.this is already common knowledge among learned people.Moses left Egypt over 5770 years ago , no construction took place after or during his time there., this is just an example that your guys are wrong.
please allow me to say.. Any negative or belittling comment on this platform regarding the history of any time period of Africa, is an indication of how your fore parents must have felt about a people who once, and still in many ways, dwarfed them spiritually. You do not see yourselves in the original people that God has created in his image. That is like having a mother that you despise. Having a mother that you despise suggests that she has done something to cause you to despise her. One thing that I can say about a man who despises, and resents his mother, is that it leaves him mentally unstable, cold and empty inside. How does one go from 1 through 9 months in the protection of his mothers womb, being nutured so that his heart, spine, and brain is formed to allow him to be born healthy and strong.. to feed from the nutrients of her breast.. teach him how to walk and talk.. and he turns on her the minute he is able to provide for himself???? here is a mirror for you to look in. Your mother showed love you by bringing you into this world.. what did your mother do to you to deserve this kind of disrespect?! Nevertheless you set out to discredit her.. and make sure you tell half truths about her. Well let me let you in on a little secret to account of history will soon be discredited, because the children of God is awakening once again. They are now investigating and studying for himself and teaching it to his kids. pretty soon he will be strong enough to judge the wicked based on his history.
A Immortals Legacy
And that is real talk my friend and time is soon about to reveal.. very quickly.
Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah.....................................................
@@Eris123451 lol is babbling the best that you can do? Im guessing you do not have a better explanation. If you do have a better understanding please share it.
You didn't explore the "mother" metaphor deeply enough, it didn't deal with a mother who was a whore, who had you because she was too shallow, scared and lazy to get an abortion, who barely kept you fed who let you run the streets in ragged clothes with snot caked all over your face and crusts in your eyes, who left you with your 11 year old sister while she ran around for days at a time smoking dope and sleeping with every loser in town, who finally (because she was never gonna change.) sent you to her parents house to live, never visited and died when she was 45 years old from sclerosis of the liver...you kind of (in your ecstatic, matriarchal, pseudo-intellectual fervor.) failed to advise the child of THAT mother. Now, while your questioning the motives of people you know nothing about attach your mother-metaphor to the child of that woman and then apply the result to your historical theory and then tell me again: Who are the wicked ones and who will judge them?
The Greeks always accepted the fact that Egypt was an African concept the formation of Egypt had it's beginnings in sub-Saharan Africa the Romans also believe this and understood this well but we have to realize the Greeks and the Romans were not poisoned by the concept of race when excavations begin in Egypt by the French during the time of Napoleon the idea of Africans was already tarnished by 300 years of racial propaganda so there was no way they were going to accept that Western civilization was built upon a civilization that was the brainchild of indigenous Africans
At 26 minutes a picture is shown of dates a bird and for me a llama, thought they only existed in S. America
Reference the 1975 UNESCO conference Cairo Egypt.
I have been to Egypt during a discovery or opening of a tomb. The only blacks in the Egyptian kingdoms were slaves. The pictures or very detailed and blatant about that. I also in the museums did see blacks as soldiers. But this is not a black race kingdom at all. You have been deceived. I have seen it with my own eyes untouched by modern man.
This Egyptian fellow on youtube that seems to have a real problem with his heritage being hijacked has many examples that are true. Though he seems to be a little hostile. ASuperEgyptian
Their are different types of Blacks, I know thats a shocker.
Genesis 10:6
So queen Tiye isn't Black ? Go home!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiye
matchona nuno www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Hatshepsut.aspx
www.en.biography.name/leaders/42-egypt/25-hatshepsut
www.mummytombs.com/egypt/mummy.dna.html
smh blacks waking up in T- Minus 10.9.8
Whatever museum you went to was a Scam!
All your stolen "artifacts" are a peoples history that was conquered and then praised for its wonders.
FO
That’s true of every civilization...does it make you feel better?
Are you even Egyptian?
So why even bring it up..smh
America is oppressing you and teaching you jealousy. Move on up. Step out of the box and open your eyes. Be at peace.
Every black person in the comments: "WE WUZ DA 'GYPTIAN KANGS 'N SHEEEIT"
+largelysubatomic I totally agree. Its funny you say that, because I remember, not long ago, the most eminent Scientists could prove the intelligent of a man by the 'bumps on his head'. They locked up Gallileo for suggesting that the Earth not flat and Marconi for getting information 'out of the air'. Luckily, since 9/11 people have woken up to 'quackdemics.' So have you seen the DREAD LOCKS on king Ahmenenhet II? Or the many statues of the 25th Dynastic Princes? Or King Huni or Taharka? Even the many statues of Rameses cannot be disputed.
Your caveman is showing
+Kevin doss Herodotus went to UPPER Egypt to learn...and his anthropological/sociological chronicles titled "Histories" focused on what is now the Middle East, Central Asia, North and East Africa. Greeks did not see themselves or were aware of the concept of "European" or "Western" civilization.
Well East Africans not West Africans, and Ancient Egyptians was a multicultural Civilization.
***** What is the use of good looks if you have only that as an offer to the world? The so called ugly man created all musical styles we know of today. They created the Blues over 100 years ago. Jazz 90 yrs ago. Soul music 65yrs ago. Funk 55yrs ago. Hip Hop 45yrs ago. And not only music, The Paterson brothers made the 1st cars (yes a black owned company). Lazer Eye surgery was created by a so called Black woman. To name a few. What gifts to the word? Yes you have been on that land for over 400 years and are part of the land. But you are ever fated to hate the Nubians and all that look like then for pretending to be them. If that technology, left by the ancients were of your blood-line, then your people would know the ancient knowledge encoded in Ancient Egyptian Philosophy. It is a shame, because no doubt you are a good man, that love your people.
22:50 onward the offering to the God or God(s) is African to it's Core! West to Southern All have done this!
Why is it so hard to believe these people didn't just spring up over night or Came from places further than the surrounding areas.
Why do they have ti come from anywhere at all? Why is everybody trying to claim Egyptian civilization? Of course there were people that came ti Egypt and even rulers that came from outside Egypt like Berber Pheroes, but it remains Egyptian made in Egypt by the hand of Egyptians. Yes, it's Egypt is part of Africa, but let's not attribute things to other parts of Africa just because we don't think they're black enough. I say the same thing applies to those from outside. I'm not Egyptian by the way- just an annoyed person on the Internet
@@MoSec9 Because it pisses off others that ancient Egypt was located in Africa. It would have been in Europe, or Asia, there would be no problem; We would naturally infer it is whites or Asians who built this civilization. Since it is in Africa, they try to dissociate this civilization from black people. So yes, it is important to know their origins; which is also legitimate because we all come from somewhere. What you call "they are Egyptians" is nonsense because they did not use "egyptians" to identify themselves..
LOL, most of these mainstream academics won't even consider the Egyptians had better tools than a copper chisel and some pounding stones, you think they're interested in discussing race?
At one point there was a world wide civilization, pyramids scattered throughout the planet from China to South America.
even the dead, are not safe from these pale creatures-- it Africans to be punished for not protecting these burial sites
I guess black people have always been fuck ups.
u fucking idiot, none of u will accept the truth, u hate your real heritage so muc,lol, sub saharian African.although knowing what the world knows about them ,lol, I don't blame you,lol,lol,lol
Has anyone ever wondered why so-called "Afrocentric" scholars (not only black people but also notable white academics) never claim that the other members of the Ptolemaic dynasty before Cleopatra nor that every single Egyptian dynasty up to the time of the Ptolemy was black? That is because they are not just structuring their arguments on some feel-good notion of racial superiority but on written evidence.
Some of the most often quoted historians from the time of the ancient Egyptians about what race the people were are Strabo, (born c. 64 bce, Amaseia, Pontus-died after 21 ce), Greek geographer and historian, Diodorus Siculus Diodorus Siculus (fl. 1st century BC) or Diodorus of Sicily a Greek historian, and Herodotus (born in Halicarnassus in the Persian Empire (modern-day Bodrum, Turkey) and lived in the fifth century BC (c. 484-c. 425 BC), "The Father of History"). In his Histories, Herodotus states in several passages that the Egyptians were black. According to most translations, Herodotus says that a Greek oracle was known to be from Egypt because she was "black", that the natives of the Nile region are "black with heat", and that Egyptians were "black-skinned with woolly hair". Lucian of Samosata (125 AD - after 180 AD) observes an Egyptian boy and notices that he is not merely black, but has thick lips. Diodorus Siculus mentioned that the Aethiopians (read sub-Saharan Africa) considered the Egyptians a colony. Apollodorus of Damascus (a Syrian-Greek engineer, architect, designer and sculptor from Damascus, Roman Syria, who flourished during the 2nd century AD), calls Egypt the country of the black-footed ones (or “Aethiopians”). Aeschylus (c. 525/524 - c. 456/455 BC), a Greek poet, wrote that Egyptian seamen had "black limbs." Greeks sometimes referred to Egyptians as Aethiopians - not to be confused with inhabitants of the modern-day nation of Ethiopia who was instead referred to as Abyssinians or Habesha and their land as Abyssinia. Sir Gaston Camille Charles Maspero KCMG was a French Egyptologist (June 23, 1846 - June 30, 1916) states that "by the almost unanimous testimony of ancient [Greek] historians, they [ancient Egyptians] belonged to the African race, which settled in Ethiopia".
Quotes from the source material (mostly Greeks and Romans who lived at the time): Pindar, "Cushites, Colchians, and Khazars". Journal of Near Eastern Studies 18 (1): 49-53: a Greek poet also described the Colchians (that Herodotus compares to the Egyptians - their forebears) as being "dark-skinned". Saint Jerome and Sophronius 350 to 400 AD, referred to Colchis as the "second Ethiopia" (sub-Saharan Africa not the country by that name) because of its 'black-skinned' population.
Imagine if Pindar had described the people of Colchis as “light-skinned” or Saint Jerome and Sophronius had represented them as the “second Greece” because of their complexions. Neither of these writers did!
Aristotle’s “Physiognomika” describes the physical traits of the Egyptians and Ethiopians (sub-Saharan Africans) as bowlegged ("bandy-legged") and 'curly-haired'. He wonders if this is due to the fact that their bodies became "distorted by heat, like logs of wood when they become dry". He contends that the hair of the Ancient Egyptians supports the theory, as it is curlier than that of other nations.
Imagine if Aristotle had said “straight-legged” and “fine-hair”; or "straighter" than that of their neighbors to the south. He did not. What if an ancient Greek had described the Egyptians as having hair texture just a little curlier than their own hair but not as curly as their Ethiopian neighbors to the south. This alone would have been enough to perpetuate the “white-Egyptian theory”, however, Aristotle did not! He said the opposite.
Strabo Ammianus Marcellinus (325/330-after 391) after his own observation stated that the Egyptians were "mostly brown and black" (like black people). Imagine if Marcellinus had said “mostly pink and tanned” (like whites). This alone would have been enough to perpetuate the “white-Egyptian theory”, however, Marcellinus did not!
Marcus Manilius described the Egyptians as lighter than the Moors: "the land of Egypt, flooded by the Nile, darkens bodies more mildly owing to the inundation of its fields." (Before this statement excites you, please note that "Moors" are mostly black and range in complexions like the Egyptians). More to the point, imagine if Manillius had written: the land of Egypt, flooded by the Nile, darkens Egyptians more severely than the Greeks and Asiatic." Imagine if Marcellinus had said "similar to the Romans" or "just a little darker than the Ascetics". This alone would have been enough to perpetuate the “white-Egyptian theory”, however, Manilius did not!
There are certainly ancient historical writers like Nearchus, Megasthenes and Eratosthenes (Strabo and Arrian also draw from them) who compare the range of complexions in ancient Egypt to the Indian population of the time. They said that Indians (Indo-Arian linguistic groups and Dravidians) are like the Egyptians and “Ethiopians” (Sub-Saharan black people not modern day Ethiopia and both descended of Ham according to Hebrew writers) burnt in color and described the Egyptians as having similar features (facial bone structure minus prognathism like most Indians) but any forensic Scientist would tell you, modern day Ethiopians, jet-black Sudanese and other Neolithic people who are considered “black”, have these same “Caucasoid” features without prognathism:
For further discussion: th-cam.com/video/WUtAxUQjwB4/w-d-xo.html
PT4. The discovery of the Qustul Incense Burner is considered one of the earliest certifiable uses of incense by a culture. This Qustul burner also rose a debate regarding the Nubian origin of Egyptian civilization. Upon the Incense Burner is a relief of a royal procession considered by many archeologists as evidence of the worlds first monarchy. This debate maintains that Nubian culture often referred to as Ta-seti, developed as early as 7000 B.C.
As far as Nubia being the origin of Egyptian kingship. This info challenges that.
Many people view Nubia as where Egyptian kingship started. This idea is based on the Qustul incense burner found in Nubia.
This info is on a falcon figurine found in the Egyptian city of Hierakonpolis. It's dated to have been made around 3700 B.C. The falcon was associated with kingship in Egypt. So this figurine demonstrates that kingship was already present in Egypt before the Qustul burner(3200 B.C). That incense burner could likely be an Egyptian import into Nubia.
Look up:
Falcon figurine
Renée Friedman
Lol, the comments section of anything Egypt related is always such a mess.
Something, something, something, pseudoscience!
Amateur, a child... you should try former yugoslav clans debating war and history. Thats Ph.D. in trolling, propagation, manipulation and decievement, with heavy toppings of provocation, and what they call "everyday making love with and to, your mother and/sister"...
Utter amateur.
@The Nomos Exactly right. People always trying to steal the history of Egypt away from Egyptians
@@eca3101 The Arabs took that away from the Ancient Egyptians
@@BronzeSista no
Funny how some people reason. Where do you think many African cultures get their tradition of rituals from. Until recent decades, when a king pass away in some parts of Africa (e.g. Yorubaland, south-west Nigeria) the corpse his buried with life human, someone called "abobaku" (meaning he who is to die with the king). Someone who is an "abobaku" live in the palace with the king before his passing to his ancestors. And in our culture we don't say a king die if he passes away. We simply say he has gone to meet his ancestors. One only need to compare cultural practices in ancient Egypt to different parts of the world and see where some of these practises are still sustained in present time.
You are so right. Not only that when you look at the white crown and the blue you see the African hairstyle. ONLY long black people's hair goes into this shape. Even Queen Charlotte had her hair like this and it staid up because she was part black. No white persons hair does that without the black mixture, whether they know it or not.
@William Eaton Sorry The people who later invaded Egypt were Caucasian. NOT the original people. That is like saying , because Americans are majority Caucasian today, that dismisses the original population, the native Americans. Nice try.
@William Eaton He wasn't caucasian. The Ginger Mummy used Henna to dye his hair the same way as Ramses II. Only ignorant folks actually believe that Ginger was actually a ginger.
@CHAD An incel calling himself chad is kind of ironic isn't it? No, Most pharaohs were far from Caucasians and some did have red hair by henna. Red hair wasn't ever natural in Egypt unless the person was an immigrant. The ancient Egyptians never worshipped blue eyes. Most of the times their gods were drawn with black eyes. Where did you get that inaccurate information about lack of Subsaharan admixture? If it's from the 2017 DNA study you're really out of your depth here because that DNA study is considered heavily flawed and inconclusive.
@William Eaton
PT3. The three ships were sailing toward the royal palace. One of the ships carried a lion - perhaps a deity. The central boat carries the king, sitting and equipped with long robe, flail and White Crown. All motifs that would later become symbols of Pharaonic rule in Egypt. This piece had been made no later than 3400 B.C. At that early date, there were not supposed to have been any such things as pharaohs or pharaohs' palaces.
They proved the Egyptians weren't white, Arab, east Indian or native American. Then after that they tried to say they were aliens 😂 like damn that's some racism, they don't want to give black people the credit so much that they said the Egyptians came from another planet 😂😂😂
Deadass 🤣🤣
Now I will research Bantu linguistic similarities with Egyptian language.
BaNTu is plural for MuNTu or MNT. The K in front of KMNT denotes a place or country of the MuNTu.(K-MuNTu) Kemet is a europeanised pronounciation.
@@jean-pierremuchuba6509 Can you share your source my brother? I wholeheartedly agree with you
@@ntsikashembe4773 The Egyptians, Persians, Arabs, Babylonians, Assyrians, Syrians and Phoenicians, the peoples of the Near East, are of one origin and have shared civilization in the past. It is unfortunate that the features of this civilization do not persist, but their peoples still exist, they have no relation to Europe, Egypt is a point of connection to Asia with Africa and no reasonable person can connect it Nigeria or Ghana,
@@ahmedelmogy2804 you're right, except that Egypt only has ancestral origins with cushites berbers semites and other afroasiatic people, persians had no genetic or linguistic relation to Egypt or even an ancestral archeological relation
A Berber is an Amazigh - you're very confused.
Nubia v.s Egypt, the oldest sibling rivalry ever.....
They are the same thing. They had our backs and we them, even ethiopia had our blessing.
Same people.
@@krono5el During ancient times they always been the same people, modern day Egyptology created the different race narrative..
@@abrahamjackson6019 i can see that and prob so
@@-o-light8863 No nubia was another civilisation it's different from Egyptian civilisation
15:49 the stone work from this period was better than stonework of later periods. You see how these clearly turned on a lathe, and cut by what could have ONLY BEEN A LASER of outrageous heat!
Ah, yes I see that.
It’s weird though how other pottery from that same time period looks to have been done by children in kindergarten. But... I suppose not everyone could afford lasers back then.
Just STOP ✋.
This was because ancient Egypt in pre-pre dynastic ancient times was technologically more advanced that we are today. Egyptologists would never mention that because it was all done by black people. They used machines more advanced than what we used today to carve statues with mathematical precision 100 percent more accurate in measurements than anything the top 5 countries in the UN today can hope you achieve if they pulled resources
@@alvanalvino why is it that we haven't found any of these machines... Not a nut or a bolt.... Nothing
@@mikewannenburg5907 Don’t interrupt a racist when they are racisting.
ALLLLLLIIIIEEEEENS is why peoples answer to why Africans had civilization while we were living in caves
PT2. The Twa and Hutu have history spanning 400,000+ years. Considering the very short period of time the western world, as we know it, has been around I would call this more than a than a civilization.
The Hutu are Eastern Bantus who moved there 3,000 years ago. They’re not that old 😂
During the seventh century the Arabs invaded North Africa three times, bringing not just a new religion but a language and customs that were alien to the native Berber tribes of the Sahara and Mediterranean hinterland.
the berbers themselves were made by the interaction of iberian people with sub Saharan peoples.
@@adam-ip3xe without sub Sahara. Back then wwe didnt went to sub sahara til recently.
YOUR LEGACY is that why there is so many “black” berbers?
@@maryamelb4918 10, 000 year old iberomaurusian dna proves 1/3 sub Saharan African. The link has always been there. Hence, the term, Afroasiatic. Not, only that, but the Levant was not homogeneous. There were 2 groups of Levantine peoples, one of which definitely had sub-Saharan lineage and went south and eastward into Africa and South East Asia, while the other group went north, eventually into Europe. I believe our ancestors actually got this one right; modern man began in the Middle East, not Africa. And, if I’m not mistaken some indigenous African tribes have an oral history of coming from the north and settling in the south. Go look at the Andamanese. The last time I checked, they had no African genes, but could easily be mistaken as African. However, they’ve been in South East Asia since forever…
You can't compress history and tell your version of their story using your history as a template. They were smarter by leaps and bounds than we are today not the reverse. They were black people not Egyptian, until given that name.
PT2.
Cemetery L at Qustul, which is a small cemetery containing unusually large and wealthy tombs of A-Group. It was in one of these graves, "L-24" coded by the excavators, that the mysterious incense burner came to light. An incense burner with figures and pictographs gouged deep into the clay. This censer had been found, not in Egypt, but nearly 200 miles deep in Nubia. The inscription showed three ships sailing in procession.
Nubia straddled both parts of Upper Egypt and parts of Lower Kush so parts of Nubia were in Egypt and parts in Kush. Therefore there were Egyptians who were Nubian and Kushites who were Nubian.
@@listenup2882it’s quite evident the civilisation spread south to north the same direction the Nile flows, all ancient sources seem to agree on this .
Isn't taking these items from the tombs raiding and robbing?? I know they are very old, and it's done for educational purposes, but if anyone else tried to take these items, they'd charge them with a serious crime. When they do it for educational purposes, it's ok though. An interesting double standard.
Where did these ancient Egyptians come from?? Did they migrate, or were they always there?? If they were always there, then how long was that?? I think the history of mankind goes back much farther than we've been told.
Take a look at that really old black vessel with the triangular bottom stand. That is masterful work, and it means they had to have sophisticated machinery, The block thing she showed would never be able to hollow out that vessel like that. It had to be made by some other type of machinery that revolved.That vessel would have to be perfectly balanced in order to stand. It's so perfect, we can assume they were making that type of vessel for a very long time. It doesn't look like the work of a beginner.
The artifacts do prove that mass murder in the form of ritualistic human sacrifice for the King, or "Gods", or whatever was very much in full swing, even thousands of years before Christ, which indicates that there is just something inherent in the human beings that predisposes us to mass murder, and murderous rituals. It's not a modern condition in any way, shape, or form, but we sure have mastered the art over the centuries. It's never been easier to commit genocide than it is right now. It's easy because nobody even cares.
Yes you are telling the truth,also iam still waiting for them to dig up the graves from a thousand years ago that's old to them.
Yes that"s true they digging up scared sites for there own purposes. That goes to say the mindset these people have.it is a crime and they are not getting away from it.the ancestors are getting angry.they will pay for thay
PT1. As I've already stated, the Africans had already mapped the constellations, calculated the distances between stars, built the pyramids in line with these calculations, calculated that a day was comprised of a 24 hour time period and a year was 365 and 1/4 days with a true leap year felling every 1,460 years. In the field of medicine Homer said “in medicine, Kemet leaves the rest of the world behind.” ~ Book 4 of The Odyssey. Hippocrates himself described Imhotep the God of medicine.
Black are the best truth is now coming out, we do not see pyramids in Arab or Europe only in Africa ,who built them? Hidden history
Just because it says African does not mean it refers to black Africa. There is a group called the northern or sub saharan Africans. They are not black. Kemet does not refer to black Egyptians and Imhotep (probably Yosef of the Hebrews) was never referred to as a black man.
Yosef himself was a 3rd generation Sumerian immigrant to what is now Judea and Samaria. The Pharaohs who were generational with the Hebrews in Egypt were the ruling elites who were in kinship with the Hittites who also were in kinship with the Hebrews. Sarah and Rebecca came from that tribe. Possible origin were by Gobekli Tepi builders, them selves probably survivors of a catastrophe.
@@jmjjim819 'Just because it says African , does not mean it refers to black Africa'...So now there's Black and White Africa? The same way I assume there's Black and White Europe....What utter nonsense...
I don’t think Book 4 of the Odyssey says that at all, do you have a specific translation which says that?
@@jeanmusamba8448 look at the sphinx. African features look at all the statues and blacks everywhere on the walls. 8m just saying no racial bias I love everyone just saying common sense
LOL! After what happened in 2006 with those Iranian tablets, if I were an Egyptian official I wouldn't loan UC anything of that value either.
What happened?
@@TobeornottooB Basically the tablets had been on loan to the University of Chicago from the Iranian government since 1933. The Iranians wanted a set back. In 2004 or 2005 University of Chicago was going to give them back as they had been doing but the US government tried to seize them and sell them at auction to compensate Israel or Israeli victims of Hamas attacks that happened back in that late 1990's. The University and Iran sued the US government withthe case going all the way up to the supreme court finally ending in 2018 with the Supreme Court ruling in favor of UC and the Iranian government.
@@TheVuduYuDu thank you for your reply
@@TobeornottooB You're welcome.
@@TheVuduYuDu a rare case of honesty i would say
black kemet
Note to everyone reading this: don't bother reading the comments on this video unless you want to lose some brain cells. Please enjoy the lecture from the Oriental Institute
good advise right there...
Most of it in no way relates to the lecture
morgana Note to everyone reading this: Don't read this.
morgana very good revision on egypt history. The pottery works were not just simple works it were carried out by royal workshops as potterys werent just used as utensils like we do today but these beautifully carved clays also had religious cultural values & would have been used in many ritualistic events, every art work had some significance which tells you the purpose it was meant for so great piece of works
morgana what would you expect from someone trusting any institution out of Chicago as a reference?
The video didn't in any way address the title of the video. I watched the whole thing and I still don't know what she is telling me the origin of ancient Egyptian civilization is
She didn’t mention kemet/Kush/Nubia not once! Lol
She avoided the hell out of the Ta Marian's race and skin color. Yea n it does matter.
They know the Nubians are the origin of the Egyptian civilization, they just hate to give black Africans credit for anything because it goes against their white washed BS
World Book Encyclopedia Copyright 1979 describe the ancient Egyptians as
"Black Haired, DARK skinned.....belonging to the European geographic race.
Plenty of holes in the European description...1st Europeans are pale "white" in body area where skin is not exposed to sunlight. One has to ask where did ancient Egypt dark skin come from? Not Europe.
Second, As outsiders came in and mixed the complexion of the population lighten, just like enslaved black Americans.
Conclusion the ancient Egyptians population complexions was darker than the people we see in Cairo today and more like the complexions of the Nubians in Lower Egypt.
Facts . I just saw a facebook post and people were mad about the origins of a lot of Americans music cause it was African Americans that created it .
Actual presentation starts at 5 minutes.
I had the pleasure of meeting Emily about 1981. I found her gracious and very helpful in assisting me with some design questions found on Egyptian jewelry.
We know who we are we don't need them to validate that for us
Maybe she's validating it to other groups of people who are too dumb to know this on their own.
Well put, I agree with you. It is a miserable waste. I occasionally make mistakes with attempting to encourage others to remain teachable when I should just observe instead of judging. Thanks for this.