I lived on the edge of a swamp, in the Pacific NW of the US, for a few years. It got more and more swampy during that time, due to rain and beaver activity. I was constantly clearing vegetation off of trails and pushing downed branches down into the mud in and next to the trails, then dumping wood chips on top to keep them walkable. In state and county parks in the PNW, where there is funding for it, it’s common find boardwalks for paths in boggy areas and tidal areas. I see no reason why Stone Age people wouldn’t also have grabbed nearby wood and stacked it carefully to maintain a relatively solid walkway as the ground water level rose.
I've loved the history of the U.K. for a long time now. I actually think it was King Arthur stories that got me going. Then I started learning about my family history and Scotland and then had to get into England to understand that relationship and that goes to Kings, Queens and wars. Sooo much drama! lol I knew that the Romans were there early and for a long time but I didn't really think about that time period. Then I saw a game (not a gamer so not sure which-it was a walk through), and it showed what it may have looked like when Romans were in Londinium and I was hooked. Now I'm down the rabbit hole of finding out what I can about that. Thanks for this. 🍁
@@TheDarthSoldier Shh. Common sense is not allowed. LOL The show is Digging for Britain. The Episode title is Britain's Atlantis. And it's all wonderful. In the United States when they dig for America they hide it all and the public doesn't get to see much of it. I love how British Archaeologist's care about educating the public and sharing it all with the public. A very rare occurrence here in America.
To think that 8,000 years ago, in Mid Stone age times, people were building complicated structures. We will have to stop calling it Stone Age! Truly extraordinary! At 53.57 I think that's Jane Austen' portrait to illustrate the late Georgian period? Cool.
There were no humans 8000 years ago. Based on evidence you can touch with your own fingers the farthest back we can go is about 4500 years ago based on the Epic of Gilgamesh.
@@glenlongstreet7 So, Neanderthals and Australopithecus built all those structures 9,000 to 12,000 years old, like Gobekli Tepe?! You may be reading old books! Or I am reading mere conjectures.
@@PlanttreesMS Around 2004-5 sort of time, (Reinforced Concrete Age date), there was a set of Royal Mail postage stamps that included the British Female Archaeologist - forgot the name - Margaret Mead maybe? who discovered a human footprint with a sewn sole shoe; that was in a rock bed that was dated x millions of years - pre-Ice Age; or in between Ice Ages.. There are now a good few city remains found on Ocean beds, around the world; so all indicating that there were civilisations there-and-gone; possibly into the billions of years ago, included. No surprise at all that there are Stone Age remains found under the sea off the current Dorset Coast. Mammoth bones have been found on the underwater now Continental Shelf of the East Coast of the USA. A corroboration that there were times when the sea level was lower, as well as higher, to what it is now. The idea of hunter-gatherers as nomads, always on the move, has always been a bit vague.. The Nomadic part of hunting and gathering would have involved movement to places for food for seasonal reasons; to Rivers or Coastal locations when a certain fish would be there, for example; so the British style Nomadicism would certainly or very likely have included settlements built for use when whatever food at one or another location was available. Wasn't evidence of metal smelting found at Gobeki Tepe? or similar location now in Turkey? Such a process of metal working wasn't supposed to exist until x thousands of years later, and so taken as a possible proof of the location of where The Ark mentioned in The Bible landed.
@@glenlongstreet7 aboriginal Australians were in Australia 65,000-60,000 years ago and American Indians were in America at least 23,000 years ago. And they both travelled from Asia. Those in Asia came from Africa at least 100,000 years ago. Us homo sapiens have been around for a lot longer than you think.
Glenlongstreet7 aboriginal Australians were in Australia between 65,000-60,000 years ago and American Indians in America at least 23,000 years ago. Both travelled from parts of Asia and everyone from Asia and Europe came from Africa at least 100,000 years ago. Homo sapiens has been around for much longer than you think.
I delivered concrete today in Australia. The house was on land that was sandy. It was 2 km from the beach. Obviously it was seabed before and will be again
ssshhhhh - look at the Isle of Thanet (now not an island) - you're not allowed to point this out!! You might further puncture their massive global hoax!
@alexlerwill344 A bit like the multitude of mature trees discovered under the icepacks in the Northern parts of "GREENland"? The Vikings used to sail over the North Pole in summer months! The Isle of Thanet was seperated from Kent in England by the Wantsom Sea by nearly 3 miles in the same period. Richborough Castle was built by the Romans on the coast there - now a mile inland!! haha! You people and your "experts" (con artists) have no bloody idea what went on - and still you all talk like you KNOW so much about everything - while making a total mess out of the planet while you're about it! Haha!
they are disciplined to believe a narrative of linear development over a span of only several millennia, acknowledging that there has to have been iterations of intelligent life here is too threatening
Based on archeological evidence, some modern human behavior may have originated approximately 150,000 years ago. And it was fully developed by 50,000 years ago. This has been known by archeologists since at least 1998 and is taught in university. Which living archeologist says humans didn't have modern intelligence 8,000 years ago? Hunter gatherers, agrarians, and pastoralists all had modern intelligence and behavior.
The year that they found these underwater platforms, other areas of the Solent also show up with human activity, even in the River Test there was an underwater forest, gone now that turned Redbridge Point into part of the container port extension, only a small area of the peat layer left now
Beavers have been making impressively strong water dams forever, but this guy is gonna get excited about a mammal with opposing thumbs being able to stack wood really
@@carolerice5944 There was a prison ship in Portland Harbour named HM Prison Weare. It was a Category C prison ship that operated from 1997 to 2006. Today there is the Bibby Stockholm housing asylum seekers - not per se a prison, though those housed there may beg to differ.
If the Romans were importing goods into Britain, that tells you that the person who imported the items was fairly wealthy ie the territorial governor because it was hella expensive to import goods into Britain.
Maybe you need to give that lobster an honorary degree in archaeology...or an honorary junior digger's award. Needs to be JUNIOR, because I don't want to take away from real diggers. They do a lot and have a lot of knowledge.
even hunter gatherers could live a settled or nearly settled life in places with sufficient resources, seems to me modern humans were experimenting with settled life soon after the end of the last glacial maximum, maybe that glacial maximum honed us, drove us to communicate better, organize better, plan better until by the end of it we had all the skills and abilities we needed to live a settled life we just had find these resource rich areas and live there and slowly, step by slow step it all began to take shape, first, in the places where it was easiest.
It astonishes me to hear archaeologists still use this binary framework, when we KNOW from the Native Americans--who were living a Stone Age way of life before First Contact--had settled villages at certain times of year, were hunter-gatherers who migrated to seasonal hunting grounds, and also farmed on. a small scale.
@@kevinkline6835 And so Agriculture / Farming developed meant a more full time settled existence was possible. For Britain this is stated as begun or known about since around 7,000 years ago, Mesolithic Period.
@@Fevebblefester Time Team was made from 1994-2014 Digging for Britain was 2010-Now For this particular compilation if you search for the segment topic + "Digging for Britain" you should find an excellent detailed episode guide & air date.
Wow, Some of the comments seem to come from some very ignorant people. Thank you "Chronicle" for sharing this episode of "Digging for Britain". I enjoyed it.
@ 18 mins what process of re-construction do you call that....mish-mash......theres no way you could have put that back together without just guessing at what it was......the wood is way to rotted.
@@channel_archistoriac What do you consider "most cases"? Only 5% of the land is inhabited, leaving 95% left to search without modern buildings in the way. Sure, many sites have been continually inhabited for thousands of years, but I'd wager there's less than 20% of all human history beneath Beijing, Bilbao and Bognor Regis. There are hundreds of known abandoned sites in the UK alone, mostly untouched. The same can be said for the Amazon rainforest now we have LiDAR technology to show it.
they need to excavate the skeletons and preserve them! it's ignorant to leave them in the ground and allow them to dissolve, preserve the science!!!!!!!!
Seriously you have a lobster archeologist and you have to make up a dodgy splash photo? I scrolled past this 10 times before I realised there was a quality doco here
"All we can do is speculate." That's all you guys ever do. At least you're admitting it for a change, instead of giving an elaborate story with virtually no evidence.
Just goes to show the oceans have been rising since the last ice age. This whole scare tactics of the polar ice is melting is crazy. If you care about the environment clean up garbage especially near water ways and plant trees
wtf does your thumbnail have stone buildings with grass roof that are still intact underwater? If you have any hope of us believing your documentary then your thumbnail should at least contain some truth.
And why wouldn't it be complex? You 'scientists' need to get over your obsession - and your suppositions - about evolution. People haven't changed. Our environments, and what these allow us to do have - but we're no different from the first people. You guys are such jokers. See the Bible.
Well, if t was left for 500 years after now longer being a living organism, it would surely have rotted, no? As such, a fair bet that they were used within a few years of felling.
@@glenlongstreet7 Ahh so you're suggesting they harvested the wood, then for ritual reasons took it to water laid it to soak for perhaps thousand few year to soften( but not rot) before telling their distant future relatives where the old wood was. Or that they ignored the mutitude of trees but went to find ancient sodden ( but unrotted) wood to build with? Or am I missing something?
@@david31162 Good points. On the other hand, In AmerIca, some woodworkers particularly value old submerged logs. But this may be because old growth is rare now, and the submerged logs are old growth.
@glenlongstreet7 The wood was placed in the water by people is the point, after being harvested and tooled. If the wood simply fell from he trees, and lay there for decades, it would have rotted away. Therefore, any quantity of worked wood that has remained, has to have been freshly worked.
Doggerland was a great civilisation that sunk following a tsunami. The Atlantis story has little to do with historical fact after all its Greecefied story twist but we have plenty of historical examples of great floods and civilisations lost to the sea so it likely is loosely based on a true event. We'll just never be able to tag the Atlantis story to any of them as like many mythical stories, its been stretched too far. We have around 1000 known stone circles in Britain, many of them had concentric wooden rings inside, whats that about? We have many prehistoric carvings also showing circles with concentric rings, where does this tradition come from?
@BogusDudeGW I've heard of mammoth teeth and the like being brought up from Dogger Bank by trawlers but I've never heard of anything about a lost civilisation, or even merely human being found. I don't doubt it had some hunter gatherers in numbers like Britain and Northern Europe but there's no reason to invent "a great civilisation".
@@Neilhuny Human use flints have been found in Doggerland, seabed now, and it didn't get sunk following a tsunami. There were a few tsunamis, and Doggerland's north coast receded only gradually, bit by bit, southwards, over hundreds or thousands of years. (Tsunamis don't raise the sea level permanently, they flood an area and then recede back to the overall sea level)? The 'Atlantis' name is now simply used for anything or anywhere that may have been above Sea level at some time or another, in the Atlantic Ocean area?
I lived on the edge of a swamp, in the Pacific NW of the US, for a few years. It got more and more swampy during that time, due to rain and beaver activity. I was constantly clearing vegetation off of trails and pushing downed branches down into the mud in and next to the trails, then dumping wood chips on top to keep them walkable. In state and county parks in the PNW, where there is funding for it, it’s common find boardwalks for paths in boggy areas and tidal areas. I see no reason why Stone Age people wouldn’t also have grabbed nearby wood and stacked it carefully to maintain a relatively solid walkway as the ground water level rose.
I've loved the history of the U.K. for a long time now. I actually think it was King Arthur stories that got me going. Then I started learning about my family history and Scotland and then had to get into England to understand that relationship and that goes to Kings, Queens and wars. Sooo much drama! lol I knew that the Romans were there early and for a long time but I didn't really think about that time period. Then I saw a game (not a gamer so not sure which-it was a walk through), and it showed what it may have looked like when Romans were in Londinium and I was hooked. Now I'm down the rabbit hole of finding out what I can about that. Thanks for this. 🍁
So excited to have found this!
Why not just title it what it is DIGGING for Britain. But I do adore this show
Yes, it’s not medieval if it’s 8,000 years old.
You can't title it "digging for Brittain", because there about 50 episodes
@@TheDarthSoldier Shh. Common sense is not allowed. LOL The show is Digging for Britain. The Episode title is Britain's Atlantis. And it's all wonderful. In the United States when they dig for America they hide it all and the public doesn't get to see much of it. I love how British Archaeologist's care about educating the public and sharing it all with the public. A very rare occurrence here in America.
I seem to recall reading that to dig for Britain, was when people were encouraged to plant vegetables in any location during the war.
@marialangdon573 interesting
To think that 8,000 years ago, in Mid Stone age times, people were building complicated structures. We will have to stop calling it Stone Age! Truly extraordinary!
At 53.57 I think that's Jane Austen' portrait to illustrate the late Georgian period? Cool.
There were no humans 8000 years ago. Based on evidence you can touch with your own fingers the farthest back we can go is about 4500 years ago based on the Epic of Gilgamesh.
@@glenlongstreet7 So, Neanderthals and Australopithecus built all those structures 9,000 to 12,000 years old, like Gobekli Tepe?! You may be reading old books! Or I am reading mere conjectures.
@@PlanttreesMS Around 2004-5 sort of time, (Reinforced Concrete Age date), there was a set of Royal Mail postage stamps that included the British Female Archaeologist - forgot the name - Margaret Mead maybe? who discovered a human footprint with a sewn sole shoe; that was in a rock bed that was dated x millions of years - pre-Ice Age; or in between Ice Ages..
There are now a good few city remains found on Ocean beds, around the world; so all indicating that there were civilisations there-and-gone; possibly into the billions of years ago, included.
No surprise at all that there are Stone Age remains found under the sea off the current Dorset Coast.
Mammoth bones have been found on the underwater now Continental Shelf of the East Coast of the USA.
A corroboration that there were times when the sea level was lower, as well as higher, to what it is now.
The idea of hunter-gatherers as nomads, always on the move, has always been a bit vague..
The Nomadic part of hunting and gathering would have involved movement to places for food for seasonal reasons; to Rivers or Coastal locations when a certain fish would be there, for example; so the British style Nomadicism would certainly or very likely have included settlements built for use when whatever food at one or another location was available.
Wasn't evidence of metal smelting found at Gobeki Tepe? or similar location now in Turkey?
Such a process of metal working wasn't supposed to exist until x thousands of years later, and so taken as a possible proof of the location of where The Ark mentioned in The Bible landed.
@@glenlongstreet7 aboriginal Australians were in Australia 65,000-60,000 years ago and American Indians were in America at least 23,000 years ago. And they both travelled from Asia. Those in Asia came from Africa at least 100,000 years ago. Us homo sapiens have been around for a lot longer than you think.
Glenlongstreet7 aboriginal Australians were in Australia between 65,000-60,000 years ago and American Indians in America at least 23,000 years ago. Both travelled from parts of Asia and everyone from Asia and Europe came from Africa at least 100,000 years ago. Homo sapiens has been around for much longer than you think.
That pot with the built in strainer may be one of the coolest pottery artifacts I’ve seen
I delivered concrete today in Australia. The house was on land that was sandy. It was 2 km from the beach. Obviously it was seabed before and will be again
The underwater platform and huts? Were above sea level at one time I presume? Right?
ssshhhhh - look at the Isle of Thanet (now not an island) - you're not allowed to point this out!!
You might further puncture their massive global hoax!
8000 years ago sea levels in the channel and North Sea where dramatically lower, there are entire forests in the North Sea from this period
@alexlerwill344
A bit like the multitude of mature trees discovered under the icepacks in the Northern parts of "GREENland"?
The Vikings used to sail over the North Pole in summer months!
The Isle of Thanet was seperated from Kent in England by the Wantsom Sea by nearly 3 miles in the same period.
Richborough Castle was built by the Romans on the coast there - now a mile inland!!
haha!
You people and your "experts" (con artists) have no bloody idea what went on - and still you all talk like you KNOW so much about everything - while making a total mess out of the planet while you're about it!
Haha!
The Gallic Samian ware, could also be quite graphic, as we found in Canterbury, a few years ago!
these are really swell doc videos. thanks.
Lusitania sank in 18 minutes, not 18 seconds.
28:47 The Lusitania was not "ripped in two and sank in 18 seconds" as stated by Prof Roberts.
It was 18 minutes. The ship was not "Ripped in two".
Quite mesmerising .
Why do todays archeologists unable to believe humans older than 8,000 years ago didn’t have intelligence that humans have today?
they are disciplined to believe a narrative of linear development over a span of only several millennia, acknowledging that there has to have been iterations of intelligent life here is too threatening
Based on archeological evidence, some modern human behavior may have originated approximately 150,000 years ago. And it was fully developed by 50,000 years ago. This has been known by archeologists since at least 1998 and is taught in university.
Which living archeologist says humans didn't have modern intelligence 8,000 years ago? Hunter gatherers, agrarians, and pastoralists all had modern intelligence and behavior.
No. They harvested the trees several thousand years ago, built their homes, and the sea level changed.
They would have been made of marine ply which is pickled to make it impervious to water and it’s not cheap.
What are you on about? I’m hoping this comment is sarcasm?
The year that they found these underwater platforms, other areas of the Solent also show up with human activity, even in the River Test there was an underwater forest, gone now that turned Redbridge Point into part of the container port extension, only a small area of the peat layer left now
I hope the archaeologist lobster was suitably rehoused 🦞🛖
Nice work cuz!
Cheers, Alice! Always a treat.
Beavers have been making impressively strong water dams forever, but this guy is gonna get excited about a mammal with opposing thumbs being able to stack wood really
So there are no dwellings as the thumbnail shows. Its just a platform made from split timbers ( a pier ) ?
At 25:11 there is a blue square looking thing. What is that? Anybody know?
Rock
Ah a good way to get my British History fix for the week!
Old coins with holes in the center were not worn as a neckless. If that were the case the holes would be near the edge of the coin not dead center.
Enjoyed the show. Sad to think prison hulks are still a thing in England in this day and age.
Prison Hulks are not “a thing” now. Where did you even hear that?
@@carolerice5944 There was a prison ship in Portland Harbour named HM Prison Weare. It was a Category C prison ship that operated from 1997 to 2006. Today there is the Bibby Stockholm housing asylum seekers - not per se a prison, though those housed there may beg to differ.
All I can think of is how can they kneel so long?
If the Romans were importing goods into Britain, that tells you that the person who imported the items was fairly wealthy ie the territorial governor because it was hella expensive to import goods into Britain.
Maybe you need to give that lobster an honorary degree in archaeology...or an honorary junior digger's award. Needs to be JUNIOR, because I don't want to take away from real diggers. They do a lot and have a lot of knowledge.
even hunter gatherers could live a settled or nearly settled life in places with sufficient resources, seems to me modern humans were experimenting with settled life soon after the end of the last glacial maximum, maybe that glacial maximum honed us, drove us to communicate better, organize better, plan better until by the end of it we had all the skills and abilities we needed to live a settled life we just had find these resource rich areas and live there and slowly, step by slow step it all began to take shape, first, in the places where it was easiest.
It astonishes me to hear archaeologists still use this binary framework, when we KNOW from the Native Americans--who were living a Stone Age way of life before First Contact--had settled villages at certain times of year, were hunter-gatherers who migrated to seasonal hunting grounds, and also farmed on. a small scale.
Agreed, As long as there were resources to be utilized they stuck around.
@@kevinkline6835
And so Agriculture / Farming developed meant a more full time settled existence was possible.
For Britain this is stated as begun or known about since around 7,000 years ago, Mesolithic Period.
Not a fan of the fake clickbait title photo....
Try to ignore it. As you know by now this is just universal crap. I just wish they would tell us how many years ago these shows were made.
Every recreation image of history is fake mate.
But it's awesome to see what places looked like based on the designs of the remains.
. . . The clearly-an-illustration photo?
@@Fevebblefester
Time Team was made from 1994-2014
Digging for Britain was 2010-Now
For this particular compilation if you search for the segment topic + "Digging for Britain" you should find an excellent detailed episode guide & air date.
did you expect there to be real photos?
Learning Building Trades was the internet, back in the day. People took pride in their contributions ⚕️🎶🎵🌹🙏~C< 3)>>-Z->}
Wow, Some of the comments seem to come from some very ignorant people. Thank you "Chronicle" for sharing this episode of "Digging for Britain". I enjoyed it.
Probably all Americans 😆🙄
Fork kew @@Littlemouse884
Because the English of today are such shining examples of human intelligence?! ....Haha!
😂 this guy made a T-shirt of his dig. 😄
well it certainly came in handy when he was explaining the layout lol
I mean we do that. I have one from my field school!
Who are/were the Rymans?
kinda funny to believe those who were at the same place that you are now but thousands of years ago are actually your ancestors
I think that the Florida bog bodies were in a crouch, not sure, but the Peruvian bodies were
@@pattyandbustershow1031 In the crouch burials I’m aware of, the knees were flexed, though.
Im so sick of people thinking that past people were stupid
Could be a pile of firewood!
Not part of Doggerland?
No as Doggerland was where the North Sea is now.
@ 18 mins what process of re-construction do you call that....mish-mash......theres no way you could have put that back together without just guessing at what it was......the wood is way to rotted.
Oh that little ship. To have been ON that boat at one time ... then left to decay. How sad. I am glad she is being saved one nail at a time.
I think that society was less tightly bound in early times and local custom and practice was wide spread
So, not local custom at all then?
@@bucklberryreturns ????
@@9hawklord Something widespread, is by definition not local.
@@bucklberryreturns Ahh bless your liccle cotton socks
@@9hawklord Nice rebuttal.
Too bad we don´t do the same in Portugal...
Most artefacts are resting in peace under layers of big cities cuz they've always been inhabitted
cuz = because in english
Not necessarily so. There are abandoned sites spread widely across the globe.
@bucklberryreturns Of course not necessarily so, but in most cases
@@channel_archistoriac What do you consider "most cases"?
Only 5% of the land is inhabited, leaving 95% left to search without modern buildings in the way.
Sure, many sites have been continually inhabited for thousands of years, but I'd wager there's less than 20% of all human history beneath Beijing, Bilbao and Bognor Regis.
There are hundreds of known abandoned sites in the UK alone, mostly untouched. The same can be said for the Amazon rainforest now we have LiDAR technology to show it.
@@bucklberryreturns Your giving 5% in the world while in the highly industrialized countries like Western European ones that number may grow up to 20%
And what guy doesn’t want to hear Prof Robert’s voice as they fall asleep?
The timing is off... 5000 years old, not 8000.
Dig up everything, leave nothing sacred.
Was accidentally running a magnitromiter or accidentally an archeologist?
they need to excavate the skeletons and preserve them! it's ignorant to leave them in the ground and allow them to dissolve, preserve the science!!!!!!!!
I'm wondering if that folding up of bodies in burials has to do with fetal position in the earth 'mother'
How are you going to just yooink digging for Britain retitle it and call it a day thats crazy
Most ads I've ever sat thru watching a yt video. 😢
The lobster found the flints for you. Did you eat the lobster or let him go to continue excavation for you?
Seriously you have a lobster archeologist and you have to make up a dodgy splash photo?
I scrolled past this 10 times before I realised there was a quality doco here
"All we can do is speculate." That's all you guys ever do. At least you're admitting it for a change, instead of giving an elaborate story with virtually no evidence.
No to the red hair dye.
They could have only built their huts under water if they had some sort of ancient SCUBA gear. Fascinating.
it'll come out soon around 8000 years ago, we stopped growing neck gills
Just goes to show the oceans have been rising since the last ice age. This whole scare tactics of the polar ice is melting is crazy. If you care about the environment clean up garbage especially near water ways and plant trees
@@dans4125 like Aquaman ?
@@stevedavy2878 The Man from Atlantis
@@Littlemouse884 Naaa he died in 1978 took a shower and turned into Bobby Ewing ha ha ha
wtf does your thumbnail have stone buildings with grass roof that are still intact underwater? If you have any hope of us believing your documentary then your thumbnail should at least contain some truth.
And why wouldn't it be complex? You 'scientists' need to get over your obsession - and your suppositions - about evolution. People haven't changed. Our environments, and what these allow us to do have - but we're no different from the first people. You guys are such jokers. See the Bible.
The wood may be 8000 years old, but that doesn't mean that it was harvested 8000 years ago.
Well, if t was left for 500 years after now longer being a living organism, it would surely have rotted, no?
As such, a fair bet that they were used within a few years of felling.
Wood doesn't rot when fully submerged. That is why it is used for piers and docks.
@@glenlongstreet7 Ahh so you're suggesting they harvested the wood, then for ritual reasons took it to water laid it to soak for perhaps thousand few year to soften( but not rot) before telling their distant future relatives where the old wood was. Or that they ignored the mutitude of trees but went to find ancient sodden ( but unrotted) wood to build with? Or am I missing something?
@@david31162 Good points. On the other hand, In AmerIca, some woodworkers particularly value old submerged logs. But this may be because old growth is rare now, and the submerged logs are old growth.
@glenlongstreet7 The wood was placed in the water by people is the point, after being harvested and tooled.
If the wood simply fell from he trees, and lay there for decades, it would have rotted away.
Therefore, any quantity of worked wood that has remained, has to have been freshly worked.
Your thumbnail is bullshit. You lose credibility immediately. Why would you make that choice?!
Wrong information
What are you trying to imphasis.
El tema es muy interesante ,pero la presentadora arruina todo .
She must be mispronouncing words on pourpuss.
That's her dialect from where she was born.
@@twistedvapeco.188 Haha!
Fake title
The bones uncovered being 800 years old must have been of people before Britons who are supposed to have arrived around the 4th and 5th century B C .
Host kinda hot hot
Those playforms are just piles of old wood they threw in the water.
Find a few wormy, broken chunks of wood, "artist" draws a stoneage village as clickbait
Which degrees and doctorates do you have? How many years in the field?
The greatest time was created by Christians. Buckle up.
If the women at these dig sites menstruate every where doesn't that mess up carbon dating?
Grow up
WTAF are you on about? Don’t breed, assuming you can find a woman who would consent to your touch.
He speaks english poorly and has nothing to say.
clickbait
Atlantis? Anything that includes that fantasy in the title is surely only for conspiracy theorists and weirdos.
Doggerland was a great civilisation that sunk following a tsunami. The Atlantis story has little to do with historical fact after all its Greecefied story twist but we have plenty of historical examples of great floods and civilisations lost to the sea so it likely is loosely based on a true event. We'll just never be able to tag the Atlantis story to any of them as like many mythical stories, its been stretched too far. We have around 1000 known stone circles in Britain, many of them had concentric wooden rings inside, whats that about? We have many prehistoric carvings also showing circles with concentric rings, where does this tradition come from?
@BogusDudeGW I've heard of mammoth teeth and the like being brought up from Dogger Bank by trawlers but I've never heard of anything about a lost civilisation, or even merely human being found. I don't doubt it had some hunter gatherers in numbers like Britain and Northern Europe but there's no reason to invent "a great civilisation".
@@Neilhunygoogle exists.
@@Neilhuny
Human use flints have been found in Doggerland, seabed now, and it didn't get sunk following a tsunami.
There were a few tsunamis, and Doggerland's north coast receded only gradually, bit by bit, southwards, over hundreds or thousands of years. (Tsunamis don't raise the sea level permanently, they flood an area and then recede back to the overall sea level)?
The 'Atlantis' name is now simply used for anything or anywhere that may have been above Sea level at some time or another, in the Atlantic Ocean area?
That red hair does not suit her . Washes her out
And that's all you took from this?!
Says the smooth brain
So sad to think that Britain
was once thick with beatiful enchanted forests
wood and straw perfectly preserved under water....
ridiculous....