Cognitive Functions (Simplified) - John Beebe's Keywords - Perceiving Functions

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 25

  • @justinb9612
    @justinb9612 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have typically thought of myself as having Ne in my top 2 functions, largely because I am indecisive and like to keep my options open. According to these descriptions though, I relate more to Ni/Se.
    I do appreciate these simplified descriptions and the cutting through of a lot of the bs info out there. Great job!

  • @jbrendel98
    @jbrendel98 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don’t believe Ni could be simply about subconscious future interpretations because that means everyone with high Ni would spend most of their time in the psychic realm (which is not uncommon for them) but not enough to make the assumption that everyone who has high Ni has invested most of their life in the occult/eastern spirituality to gain knowledge about the future.

  • @ChaosBetwenEchos
    @ChaosBetwenEchos ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Much love Aimee, we missed yooooo, lock on positivity! The hater are sanguessugas that have to be percive as such

  • @tempest-tom9180
    @tempest-tom9180 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Your presentation is flawless👌

    • @beatofmyown
      @beatofmyown  16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank you!

  • @sirbradfordofhousejones
    @sirbradfordofhousejones ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nice to see you back in the thick of typology

  • @littlesunshine603
    @littlesunshine603 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Welcome back aimee 😊

  • @Kris7245
    @Kris7245 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your channel is fantastic and finally making clear to me so many things that were muddled by other MBTI content out there. Thank you! I hope more people will discover your channel.

  • @realitiesoftypology7502
    @realitiesoftypology7502 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Huzzah! I always liked Beebe's work. To me he has more of a spiritual view of typology, not relating the functions to direct cognition as he has typed cultures too (which are not a singular mind). He tries to show the spirit of each function and I think that's pretty neat.

    • @phillipnunya6793
      @phillipnunya6793 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He is relating the functions directly to different perspectives (introversion and extraversion) of the four basic types of cognition (thinking, feeling, sensing, intuition). He just associates them with archetypes within people and society.
      He does this because he notices a consistent pattern within types for each of the positions with a different flavor depending on the function, and how this manifests in society and in media. He says that the function attitudes are absolutely qualitative in nature (there is no inherent strength hierarchy based on position), but I disagree. I think that the functions are quantitative at their core and there is a strength hierarchy, and the qualitative nature he observes is an emergent property.

  • @tamianguyen29
    @tamianguyen29 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Awesome video Aimee!

  • @nurprimahidayah4620
    @nurprimahidayah4620 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are the best Aimee, thank you.

  • @pavithraselvaraj4
    @pavithraselvaraj4 ปีที่แล้ว

    🥰 WELCOME BACK!

  • @milenapetrovic2288
    @milenapetrovic2288 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can't wait to see the next video. :)

  • @XZ858XZ
    @XZ858XZ ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow yes 100% agreed. i am Ni through and through

  • @teawithme8789
    @teawithme8789 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informing!

  • @МирославОмельченко-хтулх
    @МирославОмельченко-хтулх ปีที่แล้ว +1

    HAHAHAH SHES BACK!!! BUGAGAGAGA

  • @weirdleftovers9145
    @weirdleftovers9145 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yay! Finally first. Love your content ❤

  • @dizzygodzilla2189
    @dizzygodzilla2189 ปีที่แล้ว

    Coincidentally, I stumbled across your IG post about these literally a few days ago. Huh. Excellent.

  • @asraneo
    @asraneo ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing

  • @NunyaBidness-dt6qj
    @NunyaBidness-dt6qj ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wait, Ariel has dreams? I didn’t even see them.
    - Ni with my head in the sand over here

  • @reynaldoescanor29
    @reynaldoescanor29 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i have some question anyway..
    is these words only apply to top 2 of our value functions (dominant and creative functions)? or the child and anima also but with less dimension (like sosionics dimension concept of each blok)

  • @reynaldoescanor29
    @reynaldoescanor29 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    based on this video.. ENxJ and INxJ tends to know everything (kinda show of) ig lol

  • @phillipnunya6793
    @phillipnunya6793 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    After reading the book, I think your headers on those keywords are incorrect, and I think the middle column is swapped for the last column. If I remember correctly, the headers in the book were Persona, Ego, Self. They were not Persona, Individuated, Ego. This is a big difference, because the Ego and the Self are different things. The Ego is your conscious top four functions only, so you wont get to the root objective and fulfilment of the function (or Ego in general) without further development of the Shadow. That would be the Self.
    I will check the book later to confirm.

    • @beatofmyown
      @beatofmyown  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The columns are swapped, but the headers and associated words are also swapped along with it.