However, this is one of most stupidest Cantonese language old movie. Though actor and actress are good, stupid plot, embarrassing director, the who movie is worst movie thatI had watch from Bright light production.🎉
25 Jun 2023 A woeful, less-than-credible storyline surely. Let me justify my assertion, please. Tse Yin's character, for all his bravado in pursuing/attempting to revive Nam Hong's affections, held hostage by Lee Peng Fei (ex-mobster/smuggler), is a woeful non-fighter easily beaten up/subdued by the latter's henchmen while forcing his way into the lion's den, recklessly/thoughtlessly, if determinedly. And Hong's utter helplessness (a poor unconvincing performance here I maintain) is more self-defeatist and weak-willed than a true reflection of her "imprisoned" circumstances. She could have escaped Fei's clutches any which avenue (why, she even got to drive out of the mansion in a car late at night, with the groundkeeper's full compliance in letting her out!), even flee the country afterwards. At the very least drive up to a police station/call the authorities from her bedroom phone, for goodness sake! Talk of mightily suspending one's disbelief! What about Yin being handed a loaded revolver by Fei himself just prior to the former's assigned mission out to the"high seas/international waters" to rendezvous with the smuggler? Yin could easily have there and then forced his way out of his own "confinement/imprisonment", making his dash for freedom with Hong. Oh please! How about this piece of farce to top it all? The female servant who peeped through Hong's bedroom keyhole unannounced with Hong perfectly positioned at precisely the right distance inside at the perfect moment to gesture for the maid to call for help. Unless the two women were telepathically blessed! There are just too many unbelievably convenient, silly, even embarrassing timely coincidences/escapes from tight spots, gap-closing deus ex machina (artificial, very unlikely dramatic device-intervention contrived to resolve/remove/settle a problem/sticky situation too easily). I also won't hold back either on the badly staged verbal and physical altercations between the two millionaire suitors hankering after Hong, playing out slapstick-like a la Laurel and Hardy's comedic routine. I will accept though that the intention is to provide comic relief. Overall, a pretty amateurish crime-adventure caper that reads like a juvenile Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew novel. Yin and Hong, and Fei too, certainly had better outings in their life's oeuvre. P.S : 1963 - Nam Hong at the peak years of her physical comeliness. That I vouch for! Thank you.
睇以前嘅粵語片，好處係，可以重溫昔日香港的地方，街景，及一些事物，極度懷念！😀
你講得好啱，以前美好香港
同意，相信南紅和謝賢今日回看此片更有另一番感受。
@@mandymanyee5390 有优惠哦呵呵过后88一I破坏9-还h和9-哦结婚后----00dx😊 😢😊😊如经济+@q😊😊😊😅😅😊😊😊😊v😊-11；B：😊
感謝你對我們的支持！我們會繼續努力，上載更多精彩節目，記得要把影片分享給親朋好友喔！
I’m 😮😮😮😮😊😊
很喜歡南紅姐，美麗+演技精湛，多謝上載此片
很希望在youtube看到南紅姐演的情海金枝、假妻，謝謝!
感謝你的意見！我們會將你的建議轉達相關同事並盡量安排上架。謝謝。
睇返啲中外影片
60年代可以講
男嘅斯文 女嘅端莊
感謝上傳南紅及謝賢昔日長片。👍
感謝你對我們的支持！我們會繼續努力，上載更多精彩節目，記得要把影片分享給親朋好友喔！
However, this is one of most stupidest Cantonese language old movie. Though actor and actress are good, stupid plot, embarrassing director, the who movie is worst movie thatI had watch from Bright light production.🎉
好細聲！😢
2:54 I can still remember those taxis when I was a toddler in the early 1960's.
感謝上載
感謝你對我們的支持！我們會繼續努力，上載更多精彩節目，記得要把影片分享給親朋好友喔！
下次可否上載四哥連理枝，七重天？唔該!
連理枝已經上載過了。
非常感謝你的留言及支持。若閣下想收看《連理枝》, 可以加入「粵語長片同學會」，請點擊下方連結前往TH-cam頻道訂閱頁面，然後選擇加入會員方案，並依照平台指示進行付款即可，謝謝！
詳細教學可觀看 「粵語長片同學會」宣傳影片: th-cam.com/video/bZrBBcUhniI/w-d-xo.html
有關《七重天》的上傳要求, 我們會將你的建議轉達相關同事並盡量安排上架。謝謝。
據馬來西亞學者蕭永龍先生的考證，原來本片的原著"周君"即是倪匡。
10-6-2023
3:08
當時校車是這樣子！
1:03:09
又認識一個歇後語！
希望能上載《朱門怨》🙏
感謝你的意見！我們會將你的建議轉達相關同事並盡量安排上架。謝謝。
@@cantonesefilm_classic 感恩🙏
不知萬靈的近況?
不知飾演傭人的張翠鸞近況
🎉🎉 46:16
😍
25 Jun 2023
A woeful, less-than-credible storyline surely. Let me justify my assertion, please.
Tse Yin's character, for all his bravado in pursuing/attempting to revive Nam Hong's affections, held hostage by Lee Peng Fei (ex-mobster/smuggler), is a woeful non-fighter easily beaten up/subdued by the latter's henchmen while forcing his way into the lion's den, recklessly/thoughtlessly, if determinedly. And Hong's utter helplessness (a poor unconvincing performance here I maintain) is more self-defeatist and weak-willed than a true reflection of her "imprisoned" circumstances. She could have escaped Fei's clutches any which avenue (why, she even got to drive out of the mansion in a car late at night, with the groundkeeper's full compliance in letting her out!), even flee the country afterwards. At the very least drive up to a police station/call the authorities from her bedroom phone, for goodness sake! Talk of mightily suspending one's disbelief!
What about Yin being handed a loaded revolver by Fei himself just prior to the former's assigned mission out to the"high seas/international waters" to rendezvous with the smuggler? Yin could easily have there and then forced his way out of his own "confinement/imprisonment", making his dash for freedom with Hong. Oh please!
How about this piece of farce to top it all? The female servant who peeped through Hong's bedroom keyhole unannounced with Hong perfectly positioned at precisely the right distance inside at the perfect moment to gesture for the maid to call for help. Unless the two women were telepathically blessed!
There are just too many unbelievably convenient, silly, even embarrassing timely coincidences/escapes from tight spots, gap-closing deus ex machina (artificial, very unlikely dramatic device-intervention contrived to resolve/remove/settle a problem/sticky situation too easily).
I also won't hold back either on the badly staged verbal and physical altercations between the two millionaire suitors hankering after Hong, playing out slapstick-like a la Laurel and Hardy's comedic routine. I will accept though that the intention is to provide comic relief.
Overall, a pretty amateurish crime-adventure caper that reads like a juvenile Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew novel. Yin and Hong, and Fei too, certainly had better outings in their life's oeuvre.
P.S : 1963 - Nam Hong at the peak years of her physical comeliness. That I vouch for! Thank you.